Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at|http: //books .google .com/I
5|artjarb CoOese library
BRIGHT LEGACY
aif lb* tncoBC from thit Lccicy, »bfcb w*« tc-
JONATHAN BMOWN BKIGHT
libui, MMUctiiutna, 1> (0 be upended for b
ttti Id tcbDltnblM ja Hamrd Ualfcitlfr fv
HINRY BKICHT, JR..,
L
o
HISTORY
OF
THE COLONY OF NEW HAVEN
TO ITS ABSORPTION INTO
CONNECTICUT.
BY
EDWARD E. ATWATER.
NEW HAVEN:
PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR.
i88r.
HARVARD COLUGE LIBRARY
/!■
^'C^ 0
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year j88o,
By EDWARD E. ATWATER,
In the office of the librarian of Congress at Washington.
Stereotyped atul Printed hy Rand, Avery , 6* C^.,
Boston,
PREFACE.
THE author cannot better express the feelings which have
prompted him to study and write the history of the
Colony of New Haven, than by appropriating the following
words of Dr. Trumbull : —
" No man of genius and curiosity can read accounts of the
origin of nations, the discovery, settlement, and progress of new
countries, without a high degree of entertainment. But in the
«
settlement of his own country, in the lives of his ancestors, in
their adventures, morals, jurisprudence, and heroism, he feels
himself particularly interested. He at once becomes a party in
their affairs, and travels and converses with them with a kind
of filial delight. While he beholds them braving the horrors of
the desert, the terrors of the savage, the distresses of famine
and war, he admires their courage, and is pleased with all their
escapes from danger, and all their progress in settlement, popu-
lation, opulence, literature, and happiness."
Deeply interested in the early history of New Haven, he
thought that by imparting the information which many desire,
but few have leisure to glean from the wide field over which it
is scattered, he might do some service to the community in
which he lives. He feels assured that many descendants of the
lU
IV PREFACE.
Christian Englishmen who first brought the light of civilization
to these shores will be interested in his work. He hopes that
some whose ancestors came hither at a later period, and others
who though bom in foreign lands have chosen New Haven as
their home, and learned to love it, will gladly acquaint them-
selves with the men by whose toil and heroism this goodly
heritage was cut out of a wilderness.
The fulness of the records, both of the toiwi and of the
colony of New Haven, makes it possible to present the first
planters as, in large measure, the narrators of their own histor}\
The author, preferring that they should speak for themselves,
has made large extracts fi*om their records and fix)m other con-
temporary writings. The Xovm records of New Haven for the
first ten years are in print, and the manuscript records of the
next sixteen years have been carefully read. The records of
other towns within the colony, being less accessible to the
author, have not been so thoroughly examined : they are, how-
ever, but meagre as compared with those of New Haven.
Ralph D. Smith diligently searched those of Guilford, and
Lambert those of Milford ; and their histories have been finely
used.
Introducing the fathers of the New Haven Colony, and for-
bearing for the most part both eulogy and censure, the author
has left them to make, with their own words, such impression
as they may. He does not conceal his admiration of them ; he
does not claim that they were faultless : he desires to present
them just as they were.
His first thought was to allow every person to appear m his
01W1 orthography ; but on further reflection, he concluded to give
PREFACE. V
a few specimens of the phonetic spelling of the seventeenth
century, and then, by reducing all quotations to present usage,
to deliver his readers from the difficulty of interpreting incident
to the ancient lawlessness. Accordingly the certificate of
conformity which Davenport received the first Sunday after his
induction at St. Stephen's is printed on page 30 as it was
written ; as are also the first two documents in the Appendix.
In recording an event which took place between the first day
of January and the twenty-fifth day of March, the year has been
written according to New Style, or else both styles are given ;
but the days in a month are in all cases numbered according to
the ancient computation. The use of Old Style as applied to
days will occasion little if any trouble to the reader^ Even if
he forgets that, according to our way of reckoning, the event
took place ten days later, his misconception will not be very
important. But to record in Old Style an event which hap-
pened in the early part of the modem year, without intimating
that the year needed correction, might seriously mislead.
Reference has not always been made to the original author-
ity, in confirmation of a particular statement. Such references
may be useful to the specialist, but when frequent are annoying
to most readers. Public records have been sufficiently indi-
cated as authority for information derived from that source, and
any item acquired by gleaning from the collections of Historical
Societies is definitely referred to the volume from which it was
taken. But references to Winthrop*s Journal, Hubbard's His-
tory of New England, Mather's Magnalia, and Hutchinson's
History of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay, have been for the
most part omitted, for the reason that the specialist can readily
vi PREFACE.
find whatever these writers have transmitted to us concerning
any particular event.
To all who in answer to his inquiries have aided the author
in the compilation of this history, he presents his grateful
acknowledgments. A special tribute is due to one who has
passed suddenly and peacefully into the invisible world since
this preface was begun. Henry A\Tiite was, of all men, the most
learned in antiquarian lore pertaining to New Haven. Other
occupations obliged him to relinquish his long-cherished design
of writing a topographical history of his native town ; but his-
torical inquiries were to the last his recreation and delight. He
took a deep interest m the author's work as soon as he knew
that it had been undertaken, encouraged him to believe that it
would be a pleasure to converse frequently concerning it, and
on one occasion spent days in such a search of the land-records
as only he was competent to make. In the . last intemew
which the author had with him, he gave vocal expression to a
desire abeady evident, exclaiming with animation, "I wish I
could help you more."
New Haven, October, i8&x
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I. PACK.
Condition of England in the Seventeenth Century, as it
affected the puritan emigration in general . . i
•
CHAPTER II.
Events which influenced some of the First Planters of
New Haven to remove from their Native Land to
New England 28
CHAPTER III.
The Voyage of the Hector 45
CHAPTiER IV.
The Winter spent in Massachusetts 58
CHAPTER V.
The First Year at Quinnipiac 69
CHAPTER VI.
Foundations laid in Church and State 93
CHAPTER VII.
Division of Land 104
CHAPTER VIII.
Personnel of the Plantation 112
CHAPTER IX.
M I lford. — Guilford. — Southold. — Stamford . . • 15S
vu
• • •
VUl TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CHAPTER X. PACK.
Establishment o? a Colonial Government . . . • 177
CHAPTER XL
Industrial Pursuits 189
CHAPTER XII.
Religion and Morals 225
CHAPTER XIII.
Learning 261
CHAPTER XIV.
Military Affairs 293
CHAPTER XV.
The Aborigines 316
CHAPTER XVI.
Domestic and Social Life 348
CHAPTER XVII.
History of the Colonial Go\'ernment to the Restoration
OF THE Stuarts 385
CHAPTER XVIIL
The Stuarts and the Regicides 419
CHAPTER XIX.
Connecticut procures a Charter which covers the Ter-
ritory OF New Ha\'en 445
CHAPTER XX.
Controversy with Connecticut 463
CHAPTER XXL
New Haven submits 509
TABLE OF CONTENTS, ix
APPENDIX.
PAGB.
I. Autobiography of Michael Wigglesworth . . .531
II. Nathaniel Rowe's Letter to Winthrop ... 535
III. Lamberton's Ship 537
IV. Names of People as they were seated in the New-
Haven Meeting-House in 1647, 1 656* AND 1662 . 542
V. Hopkins Grammar School 555
VI. New Haven's Remonstrance 561
VIL New Haven's Case stated . . 566
ILLUSTRATIONS.
1. New Haven in 1641 Faces title-page.
2. A Barque of the Seventeenth Century ... 55
3. Autographs of Davenport and Eaton .... 67
4. Medal commemorating the Settlement of New Haven, 74
5. Autographs of Momaugin and his Council ... 88
6. Autographs of Montowese and Sawseunck ... 89
7. A Portrait which belonged to the Eaton Family . 115
8. Portrait of John Davenport 123
9. MiLFORD IN 1646 Faces page 155
la Town Seal of Milford 157
11. A Meeting-House of the Seventeenth Century . . 246
12. Ground Plan of a Meeting-House 249
13. Whitfield's House as seen from the South . . . 349
14. Whitfield's House as seen from the West . . 349
1$. First Floor of Whitfield's House 351
16. Second Floor of Whitfield's House . . . . 351
17. Attic Floor of Whitfield's House 351
HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
CHAPTER I.
CONDITION OF ENGLAND IN THE SEVENTEENTH CEN-
TURY, AS IT AFFECTED THE PURITAN EMIGRATION
IN GENERAL.
EMIGRATION to New England in the seventeenth
century is to be attributed to the discomfort ex-
perienced by the English Puritans in their native land,
rather than to any attractiveness in this transatlantic
wilderness. It is difficult for those who from their
earliest remembrance have been surrounded with the
security, beauty, and plenty enjoyed by the posterity of
these colonists, to conceive of the same territory as it
was seen by their ancestors when they arrived, or as
it presented itself to the eye of imagination when they
decided to emigrate. New England is to its present
inhabitants their pleasant home ; but the Englishmen,
who in the seventeenth century were uncomfortable in
England, loved England as their dear native land, and
thought of America as a foreign country, and as such.
2 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
destitute of the attraction and charm which appertain
to the idea of home.
Moreover, emigration to the New World was not
merely exile from a land they were reluctant to leave :
it was exposure to suffering by cold and hunger, to
peril of death by shipwreck, by wild beasts, and by
treacherous savages. Such liabilities are, indeed, not
unattractive to men in whom the love of adventure
predominates ; but the English Puritans were in gen-
eral as free from that restlessness of mind which seeks
relief in excitement as any people in the world.
Their theology furnishing a central Being whom they
acknowledged as infinitely their superior, they were
content to rest in him, and so had inward peace. Re-
ligion, inclining them to sobriety and industry, fostered
the love of home, of security, and of comfort. Individ-
uals among them may have been susceptible to the love
of adventure ; but, as a class, the planters of New Eng-
land were not men naturally inclined to desert their
homes, and expose themselves to hardships and perils
on the ocean and in the wilderness. On the contrary,
their training had been such as inclined them to remain
in their native land. This is true, even of the unmar-
ried men ; but the reluctance to emigrate was, of course,
far greater when one must expose wife and children to
hardships they were less able than himself to endure.
If the settlement of New England had been the
result of mere adventure, its history would have had
so little connection with that of the mother-country,
that its relation might properly commence with the first
arrival of colonists ; but actually there is such a con-
.tinuity of history between the emigration and the
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL, 3
influences which led to it as requires the historian of
a New England colony to discourse of England more
than the mere title of his work would seem to jus-
tify. To relate the history of New Haven, therefore,
one must go back to an earlier date than its actual
settlement.
The contest between arbitrary and constitutional
government, which had never ceased in England after
King John signed the Magna C/iarta^ raged with un-
usual violence while the throne was occupied by the
Stuarts. The reign of the Tudors had been a period
of comparative rest ; the Wars of the Roses having so
weakened the great barons, who in earlier times made
and deposed kings at their pleasure, and the introduc:
tion of artillery having so strengthened the monarch
against an enemy destitute of these engines of destruc-
tion, that, from Henry the Seventh to Elizabeth, there
was but faint resistance to the will of the sovereign by
the hereditary lords who sat in the upper house of
Parliament. By the transfer of the supremacy of the
Church, another check on the royal prerogative had
been removed ; so that the lords spiritual, who in the
olden time had been as little dependent on the king as
the lords temporal, were now subservient to the power
which placed them in office. The Tudors, therefore,
transmitted to their successors a more arbitrary sceptre
than had been wielded by earlier kings.
But the time of the Stuarts was less favorable than
that of the Tudors for maintaining a theory and prac-
tice of government which contravened the rights of the
subject. Formerly the great barons had come to Par-
4 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
liament followed by hundreds of archers and speamien
ready to back their lords in any contest which might
occur ; but the barons only, and not their retainers, had
presumed to put to question the conduct of the over-
lord. Out of the decay of this feudal baronage, there
had gradually grown up a new antagonist to despotism,
which, exhibiting considerable power in the reign of
Elizabeth, vigorously encountered the house of Stuart
at its accession, and suffered no permanent defeat till
it had brought a king of England to the scaffold.
The change in the tenure of land whereby the vassal
had become a farmer and in some instances a freeholder ;
the growth of towns by the increase of manufactures
and of commerce ; the intellectual activity awakened by
the revival of learning, by the new art of printing, by
the reform in theology, and by the revolutionary trans-
fer of the supremacy of the Church, — had conspired to
lift the common people into a higher position. With
this elevation of the common people, the House of Com-
mons rose in importance. The shires and towns, which
originally were invited to send representatives to Par-
liament, that through them they might give consent to
taxes which the king wished to levy not only upon the
greater lords, but upon the whole population, at first
sent men, who, having no ambition to figure as legis-
lators, gladly retired to their homes as soon as they
had voted the supplies required. But consent to taxa-
tion was sometimes accompanied with a statement of
grievances ; and afterward, when the Commons had
grown in power and courage, was withholdcn till a
promise of redress had been obtained. At first the
Commons were content if laws were enacted by the
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL. 5
royal authority in accordance with their petitions, but
afterward required that the order of proceeding should
be reversed, so that all legislation must originate and
receive its final shape in Parliament.
Whatever resistance had been offered to arbitrary
government during the reign of the Tudors, had pro-
ceeded, not chiefly, as in earlier times, from the House
of Lords, but chiefly from the House of Commons, rep-
resenting a power already great and constantly increas-
ing. There had been a change, moreover, in the mode
in which acts of despotism were resisted ; for the king
no longer found his subjects arrayed in arms against
him, but meeting him, whenever he asked for another
supply of money, with a demand for further restriction
on his prerogative. Elizabeth, the last of the Tudors,
found this disposition of the Commons so annoying,
that she avoided, as much as possible, giving occasion
for such conflicts ; well knowing that the Crown, if de-
pendent on Parliament for supplies, could obtain them
only by concession. By avoiding as much as possible
the waste of war, by conducting into her exchequer
every stream of tribute which could be controlled with-
out the aid of the Commons, she hoped to render
herself independent of Parliaments, and would probably
have succeeded but for the wars forced upon her, in the
last half of her reign, by Mary of Scotland and Philip of
Spain.
This new antagonist to arbitrary government, which
had become somewhat formidable to the last of the
Tudors, continued to increase in courage and strength
under her successor. But not only was the age in which
the Stuarts reigned less favorable than that of the
6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Tudors to the theory and practice of arbitrary govern-
ment, but the two families differed in their ability to
cope with this new antagonist as much as their re-
spective eras differed in the kind of ability required.
If the two families could have changed places, the
Stuarts might perhaps have been competent to deal
with such Parliaments as assembled in the reign of
Henry the Seventh ; and the Tudors would certainly
have shown more tact than the Stuarts did in contend-
ing against the English people of the seventeenth
century.
This contest between the Stuarts and the English
people, on account of its bearing on emigration to New
England and the commencement of a new colony at
New Haven, we shall briefly review.
James the First ascended the throne of Elizabeth in
the belief that by the ordinance of God he was entitled
to govern without regard to the will of his subjects.
He had already declared, in his work on " The True Law
of Free Monarchy," that, "although a good king will
frame his actions to be according to law, yet he is not
bound thereto but of his own will and for example-
giving to his subjects." At a later date, he said in a
speech in the Star-Chamber, "As it is atheism and
blasphemy to dispute what God can do, so it is pre-
sumption and a high contempt in a subject, to dispute
what a king can do, or to say that a king cannot do
this or that." Some writers attribute to him, and some
to his son Charles, the saying, " I will govern according
to the common weal, but not according to the common
will." If James did not originate, he would doubtless
have been willing to adopt, this form of words.
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL, 7
But, though the new king was known to entertain
such a theory of kingship, he was received by those of
his subjects who held the opposite sentiments with joy
and hope ; for he was no more objectionable in this
respect than Elizabeth, and they confidently expected
that he would so exercise his prerogative as to relieve
them from one of the most galling of their burdens.
Th^ Tudors had transferred the supremacy of the
Church from the pope to the king, but had shown
themselves as arbitrary in their ecclesiastical as in
their civil supremacy, legislating without the concur-
rence of clergy or laity, and enforcing the strictest
conformity to the established ritual. The spirit in
which Elizabeth ruled the Church may be inferred from
the note she sent to the Bishop of Ely, when he de-
murred to a proposal that he should surrender a portion
of his garden because a favorite of the queen desired
that site for a new palace. "Proud prelate," she
wrote, "you know what you were before I made you
what you are. If you do not immediately comply with
my request, by God, I will unfrock you." With similar
tyranny she had refused every application for the relief
of persons who had scruples in regard to some of the
ceremonies prescribed in the ritual of the Church.
These Puritans hoped, that as James had been educated
in Scotland, where the Church itself had controlled its
own reformation, and had carried the reform farther
than the Tudors had been willing to carry it in the
Church of England, they should find the new king
friendly to their wish for further progress in the work
of amendment. Possibly, if they had been of the same
political principles with the king, they might have ob-
tained some concessions.
8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
But he well knew that the Puritans were to a man of
the popular party, and constituted its strength, and that
on the other hand the opponents of further reform in
the Church were supporters of the royal prerogative.
His choice between the parties was soon made, and at
the Hampton Court Conference, in the first year of his
reign, was fully declared. In his journey from Scotland,
a petition signed by eight hundred and twenty-five
English clergymen from twenty-five counties had been
presented to him, asking for a confereftce in regard to
ecclesiastical abuses. In response to this petition, four
of the leading Puritan divines, selected by the king,
were invited to meet some dignitaries of the Church
opposed to all change, in a conference before the king
as moderator. But the conference was so conducted as
to show that the king had already decided the matter
adversely to the Puritans. The first day they were not
admitted to his presence, the time being spent in pre-
liminary consultation between the king and the bishops.
On the second day, after the Puritans had stated their
case, and their opponents had replied, the king, for-
getting his position as moderator, took up the argument
for conformity, and so " peppered " the Puritans, to use
his own expression, that they were dismayed and put
to silence.
All that the petitioners could obtain, as the result of
this conference, was that candidates for confirmation
should be previously instructed by means of a cate-
chism to be prepared for that purpose, that a new trans-
lation of the Scriptures should be provided, that the
Apocrypha should be distinguished from the canonical
Scriptures, that a few explanatory words should be in-
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL. 9
serted in the Articles of Religion, and that the enforce-
ment of uniformity might be delayed to give time for
the resolution of doubt and the settlement of convic-
tion.
In his interview with the bishops, previous to the
admission of the Puritan clergymen, the king had pro-
pounded the prejudice he himself entertained against
private baptism by persons not in orders, and the
Churchmen had consented that it should be restricted
to cases of necessity. His own objection to conformity
to the Church of England being thus taken away, he
had no regard to the scruples of others. As between
the two Churches of England and of Scotland, he
avowed his preference for the former, narvely admitting
that the preference issued from his political principles,
rather than from his religious convictions. "No
bishop,'* said he, "no king.*' "A Scottish presbytery
agreeth as well with monarchy as God with the devil.**
But James had no occasion for instituting such a
comparison in reply to the petitioners ; for the petition
expressly disavowed a wish for "parity,** and asked
only for changes not affecting the constitution of the
Church. The Puritans had not yet become disaffected
toward episcopacy ; and, if James had granted them re-
lief from the grievances mentioned in their petition,
there would have been less of extravagance in the
flattery of the courtiers who styled him the Scottish
Solomon. As it was, he resembled Rehoboam rather
than Solomon ; driving the Puritans into such, hostility
to prerogative, both royal and episcopal, that nothing
less would content them than "a church without a
bishop, and a state without a king.*' It appears from
lO HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" Certain Considerations Touching the Better Pacifica-
tion and Edification of the Church of England," written
by Lord Bacon, and " dedicated to his most excellent
majesty," that James, like Rehoboam, came to his decis-
ion in opposition to wise counsel. Bacon says, " These
ecclesiastical matters are things not properly appertain-
ing to my profession ; but finding that it is in many
things seen that a man that standeth off and somewhat
removed from a plot of ground doth better survey it
and discover it than those which are upon it, I thought
it not impossible, but that I, as a looker-on, might cast
mine eyes upon some things which the actors them-
selves, especially some being interested, some being
led and addicted, some declared and engaged, did not
or would not see." He inquires, "Why the civil state
should be purged and restored by good and wholesome
laws made every third or fourth year in parliament
assembled, devising remedies as fast as time breedeth
mischief ; and contrariwise the ecclesiastical state should
still continue upon the dregs of time, and receive no
alteration ^ow for these five and forty years or more.
But if it be said to me that there is a difference be-
tween civil causes and ecclesiastical, they may as well
tell me that churches and chapels need no reparations,
though castles and houses do : whereas, commonly, to
speak truth, dilapidations of the inward and spiritual
edifications of the church of God are in all times as
great a^ the outward and material."
The first parliament in the reign of the new king met
a few weeks after the conference at Hampton Court.
A majority of the lower house were in full sympathy
with the Puritan clergy in desiring further reformation
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL, 1 1
of the Church ; and some who were personally indiffer-
ent to the ceremonies and other matters in controversy
were disposed to side with the aggrieved party, either
on the ground that rings, surplices, and crosses were
important to those who esteemed them important, or
that, by favoring the Puritans, they might obtain from
them more aid in the impending contest between the
Crown and the Commons. The speaker, in his first
address to the king, took occasion to affirm that " by
the power of your majesty's great and high court of
parliament only, new laws are to be instituted, imper-
fect laws reformed, and inconvenient laws abrogated ; "
that " no such law can be instituted, reformed, or abro-
gated, but by the unity of the Commons' agreement,
the Lords* accord, and your majesty's royal and regal
assent ;" that "this court standeth compounded of two
powers ; the one ordinary, the other absolute : ordinary
in the Lords' and Commons' proceedings, but in your
highness absolute, either negatively to frustrate or
aflfirmatively to confirm, but not to institute."
In making up the roll of the House, it was found that
the king had already decided that one of the persons
returned as elected was ineligible, and had ordered a
new election, so that there were two claimants of the
seat. The House insisted on its privilege of determin-
ing its own membership in all cases of contested elec-
tions, but compromised with the king'by excluding both
claimants with the consent of the first chosen, and
ordering a third election. With great copiousness of
courteous speech they established so firmly the privi-
I lege of the House to determine contested elections,
that it has never since been brought in question.
12 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
On the 13th of June, a committee reported a form for
a petition to his majesty, in which they say, "We have
thought it expedient, rather by this our humble peti-
tion to recommend to your majesty's godly considera-
tion certain matters of grievance resting in your royal
power and princely zeal, either to abrogate or moderate,
than to take the public discussing of the same unto
ourselves ; to the end (if it so seem good to your high-
ness) we may from the sacred fountain of your ma-
jesty's niost royal and religious heart, wholly and only
derive such convenient remedy and relief therein as to
your princely wisdom may seem most meet. The mat-
ters of grievance (that we be not troublesome to your
majesty) are these : the pressing the use of certain
rites and ceremonies in this Church, as the cross in
baptism, the wearing of the surplice in ordinary parish
churches, and the subscription required of the ministers
further than is commanded by the laws of the realm ;
things which, by long experience, have been found to be
the occasion of such difference, trouble, and contention
in this Church, as thereby divers profitable and painful
ministers, not in contempt of authority or desire of
novelty, as they sincerely profess and we are verily
persuaded, but upon conscience toward God, refusing
the same, some of good desert have been deprived,
others of good expectation withheld from entering into
the ministry." It is not certain that this petition was
ever presented to the king ; but he must have known
that it was on the way, when, on the 26th of the same
month, he sent a letter to the House declining to re-
ceive a subsidy, which all the world knew would be
granted only in return for the redress of grievances.
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL, 1 3
Meantime the House had sent to the king a letter
styled " An Apology Touching Their Privileges," in
which they complain, with great copiousness of respect-
ful language, of the wrong which had been done to his
majesty by misinformation, touching the estate of his
subjects and the privileges of the House, and " disclosing
unto your majesty the truth of such matters as hitherto
by misinformation hath been suppressed or perverted."
On the 7th of July the House was prorogued ; and
when it again assembled in November, 1605, the discov-
ery of the gunpowder-plot had hushed the strife be-
tween the Puritans and the king, uniting all Protes-
tants in a common enmity against Papists. But in
subsequent sessions the Commons found so many
grievances to be redressed before supplies could be
granted, that the king preferred to dissolve the Parlia-
ment in February, 161 1, rather than fill his exchequer
by further sacrifices of his prerogative.
In April, 1614, having first by private negotiation
secured a promise of aid from some who had been lead-
ers of the popular party, the king ventured to call his
second Parliament, but the experiment proved a failure ;
the Commons, even after the king had sent a message
requesting that a supply might be granted and threat-
ening to dissolve the Parliament if they refused, voting
to postpone supply till their grievances were redressed.
The Parliament was accordingly dissolved just two
months after it began to sit.
The Parliament which assembled in January, 1621,
was at first on good terms with the monarch, who in
the opening speech, acknowledging that he had been
misled by evil counsellors, made fair promises for the
14 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
future. The two parties were drawn together by their
common sympathy with the king's son-in-law, the Elect-
or Palatine, involved in a quarrel with the German
emperor, which threatened to deprive him of his hered-
itary dominions. The king naturally desired to assist
the husband of his daughter and the father of her chil-
dren to preserve his patrimony ; and the people sympa-
thized with the elector as the champion of Protestant-
ism, overborne by the combined forces of Romanism.
The Commons at once voted supplies for carrying on
war in aid of the elector. But, before the expiration of
the year, the king and the Commons were again at vari-
ance ; he rebuking them for meddling with matters of
state which did not concern them, and declaring him-
self "very free and able to punish any man's misde-
meanors in Parliament, as well during their sitting as
after ; " and they responding with a formal protest as
follows : viz., " That the liberties, franchises, privileges,
and jurisdictions of Parliament are the ancient and
undoubted birthright and inheritance of the subjects of
England ; and that the arduous and urgent affairs con-
cerning the king, state, and the defence of the realm
and of the Church of England, and the making and
maintenance of laws and redress of mischiefs and griev-
ances which daily happen within this realm, are proper
subjects and matter of counsel and debate in Parlia-
ment ; and that, in the handling and proceeding of those
businesses, every member of the House hath, and of
right ought to have, freedom of speech to propound,
treat, reason, and bring to conclusion the same ; that the
Commons in Parliament have like liberty and freedom
to treat of these matters in such order as in their judg-
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL. 1 5
ments shall seem fittest ; and that every such member
of the said House hath like freedom from all impeach-
ment, imprisonment, and molestation (other than by the
censure of the House itself), for or concerning any bill,
speaking, reasoning, or declaring of any matter or mat-
ters touching the Parliament or Parliament business ;
and that, if any of the said members be complained of
and questioned for any thing said or done in Parliament,
the same is to be showed to the king, by the advice and
assent of all the Commons, before the king give cre-
dence to any private informations."
This formal protest having been recorded in the
journal of the House, the king erased it with his own
hand, and a few days afterward dissolved the Parlia-
ment.
The next Parliament met in February, 1624, was pro-
rogued in May, and dijd not again assemble, being dis-
solved by the king's death on the 27th of March, 1625.
During its brief session, unusual concord prevailed
between the king and the Commons, by reason of war
with Spain, which religious animosity rendered popu-
lar ; and the more so, that the war had been preceded
by an apprehension that a Spanish princess would
become the wife of the heir to the British crown. The
Commons voted large supplies for carrying on the war,
and with the more alacrity, because the king had
himself proposed that the money should be put into the
hands of a committee of Parliament, to be expended
by them, and not into the royal exchequer.
Charles the First was constrained by his need of
money to call a Parliament immediately upon his ac-
cession, but soon quarrelled with the Commons, as his
l6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
father had done, about his prerogative and their privi-
leges. Putting an end to their sessions, he called
another Parliament in the succeeding year, but with no
improvement in the state of feeling between the king
and the Commons; and in a few months the second
Parliament of this reign came to an end. The king,
left without revenue by the refusal of Parliament to
vote supplies, not only laid and collected arbitrary
taxes, but exacted from the nobility, the gentry, the
clergy, and the merchants, forced loans. Those who
refused to lend were imprisoned, and, when they claimed
their liberty by liabeas corpus^ found that Magna Cluxrta
was of no avail against the will of the king.
In this state of things, Charles called his third Par-
liament in 1628; being constrained to such a course by
the insufficiency of the revenue collected by illegal
means. When the Commons jissembled on the 17th
of March, they came with the determination not to vote
supplies unless the king would promise to put an end to
his arbitrary measures. Early in the session, they
passed the following resolutions, without a dissenting
voice : —
'• I. That no freeman ought to be committed or de-
tained in prison, or otherwise restrained, by command of
the king, or the Privy Council, or any other, unless some
cause of the commitment, detainer, or restraint be ex-
pressed, for which by law he ought to be committed, de-
tained, or restrained. 2. That the writ of habeas corpus
cannot be denied, but ought to be granted to every man
that is committed or detained in prison or otherwise
restrained by command of the king, Privy Council, or
any other ; he praying the same. 3. That if a freeman
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL. I /
be committed, or detained in prison, or otherwise re-
strained, by command of the king. Privy Council, or any
other, no cause of such commitment, &c., being ex-
pressed, and the same be returned upon an habeas
corpus granted for the said party, that then he ought
to be delivered, or bailed. 4. That the ancient and
undoubted right of every freeman is, that he hath a full
and absolute property in his goods and estate ; and that
no tax, tallage, loan, benevolence, or other like charges,
ought to be commanded or levied by the king or his
ministers, without common assent of Pariiament."
A few days after this declaration of the right of
English subjects, they presented a petition to the king,
in which they showed how all these rights of the sub-
ject had been recognized in Magna Charta, and in acts
of Parliament subscribed by his majesty's royal pred-
ecessors ; declared that they had all been violated of
late by forced loans, by imprisonment without cause
shown, by disregard of the writ of habeas corpus^ by
billeting soldiers and mariners in private houses, and
by the unnecessary establishment of martial law. The
petition closed with a prayer that such illegalities and
wrongs might cease.
The answer of the king was regarded as evasive ; and
both houses of Parliament joined in a request that his
majesty would return a more explicit reply to the Peti-
tion of Right. Charles, thus harassed, came into the
House of Lords, commanded the Commons to attend
upon him there, and gave his assent to the petition in
the customary form, declaring that in his former answer
he had had no intention of withholding any thing con-
ceded in the latter. Three days later, to accelerate a
1 8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
vote of supplies, he expressed his willingness that the
Petition of Right should be recorded, not only in both
houses of Parliament, but in all the courts of West-
minster, and that it should be printed for his honor, and
the content and satisfaction of his subjects.
The Commons, pleased with such a triumph of law
over autocracy, immediately voted a liberal sum for
supplying the king's necessities, and were proceeding
to pass an act for a further supply by a grant of tonnage
and poundage, when the incorrigible Stuart, learning
that the grant was to be accompanied by a remon-
strance against the illegal collection of the tax before it
had been granted, prorogued the Parliament in a speech
in which he denied that in giving assent to the Petition
of Right he had debarred himself from exacting ton-
nage and poundage by virtue of his royal prerogative,
and commanded all present to take notice, that the
interpretation he was giving to the instrument was
its true meaning and intent ; adding, " But especially
you, my lords the judges, for to you only, under me,
belongs the interpretation of laws." After the proroga-
tion this violent speech was, by the king's command,
entered on the journal of the House ; and by the same
authority it was printed along with the Petition of
Right and the unsatisfactory answer it had at first re-
ceived, no mention being made of the explicit assent
afterward given in the customary formula of royal
ratification.
When the Parliament again assembled on the 20th of
January, 1629, the nation was greatly irritated, not only
by the collection of tonnage and poundage and other
illegal taxes, but by the excessive and cruel punishments
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL, 1 9
unjustly, and without warrant of law, inflicted by the
Star-Chamber and the High Commission. Hitherto the
questions at issue between the king and the Commons
had pertained chiefly to civil rights : but, during the
contest, the assertors of civil rights and the advocates
of further reform in the Church had more and more
coalesced ; the Puritans being to a man opposed to
despotism, and the leaders of the popular party, if they
had no positive and earnest convictions in regard to the
religious questions at issue, taking sides with the Puri-
tans because the Puritans had taken sides with them.
Similar reasons had drawn the king into a closer
connection with those Churchmen who insisted on the
retention of the ceremonies obnoxious to Puritans, and
on the enforcement of an absolute conformity. The
king favored such men as Laud and his co-adjutors in
their churchmanship, because they supported him in his
attempt to trample upon the constitution and the laws.
Through Laud, who since the death of the Duke of
Buckingham had become his principal adviser, Charles
enjoined upon the clergy to preach the merit of paying
taxes and making loans not authorized by Parliament.
When Archbishop Abbott refused to license the print-
ing of one of the sermons thus originated, he was sus-
pended from the functions of his office, and his authority
was transferred to a commission over which Laud pre-
sided.
The two parties being thus at variance on ecclesias-
tical as well as political questions. Parliament had no
sooner assembled than the Comnwns began to seek the
redress of grievances relating to religion, as well as of
such as related to person and property. It had been
20 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
discovered that in the negotiations for the marriage of
Charles with Henrietta Maria, both he and his father
had secretly signed a promise that not only the queen
and her attendants, but all Englishmen as well, should
be exempt from the operation of the laws of England
which prohibited the exercise of the Roman Catholic
worship. It was seen that the Church of England,
under the direction of Laud, was drifting toward the
Church of Rome, and thus becoming more unsatisfac-
tory to Puritans than it had been under the administra-
tion of Abbott. The latter prelate had been lenient
toward those who had conscientious scruples about cere-
monies : Laud, on the other hand, not only exacted the
most rigid conformity to the ceremonies legally required,
but procured an order of the king's privy council, or-
daining changes in the position and furniture of the
communion-table, exceedingly unpalatable to those who
already experienced sufficient difficulty in overcoming
their scruples and persuading themselves to conform.
On the 2Sth of February a committee previously
appointed for the purpose made a report on religious
grievances. They complained, among other things, that
books in favor of popery were licensed by the bishops,
and books against popery were suppressed ; that candle-
sticks were placed on the communion-table, which they
said was now wickedly called a high altar ; that pictures,
images, and lights were used in the worship of the Church ;
that clergymen celebrating divine service crossed them-
selves at every change of posture, and in time of prayer
turned their backs toward the people, as if the eastward
position were essential ; that, these ritualistic practices
being enjoined upon them by their bishops, learned,
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL. 21
orthodox, and pious ministers, who could not in con-
science obey the injunction, were brought to grief for
disobedience.
The king, enraged at this attack upon his hierarchical
allies, endeavored to prevent action on the report by
ordering the speaker to pronounce the House adjourned.
But, the House claiming that it could be adjourned only
by its own act, some of the members held the speaker
in the chair, while others locked the door, and brought
the keys to the table. The speaker declaring that he
dare not and would not put to vote any motion, seeing
that the House was adjourned by the king's command,
one of the members read a protest to which others
assented, and the House then adjourned itself to the
lOth of March. On the loth of March the king dis-
solved the Parliament, in a speech in which he threat-
ened with his vengeance those vipers^ as he called them,
who had been most active in resisting his adjournment
of the House of Commons.
His third Parliament being thus brought to an end,
Charles was by this time so disgusted, that in a procla-
mation issued twelve days afterward he said, " We have
showed, by our frequent meeting our people, our love to
the use of Parliaments ; yet, the late abuse having for
the present driven us unwillingly out of that course, we
shall account it presumption for any to prescribe any
time unto us for Parliaments, the calling, continuing, and
dissolving of which is always in our power." So deep-
rooted was his dislike, that eleven years intervened be
tween his third and his fourth Parliaments, during which
time he levied taxes, and exacted benevolences and loans
at his pleasure, punishing with imprisonment and heavy
22 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
fines those who refused to open their purses at his
arbitrary demand.
The Puritan emigration from England, for which we
are endeavoring to account, commenced while Charles
was holding his third Parliament. Plymouth had, indeed,
been settled before this time and before Charles came
to the throne ; but the Pilgrims who planted that colony
had been already exiles from their native land for twelve
years before they crossed the ocean. The successful
prosecution of that enterprise for eight years had now
demonstrated the feasibility of establishing such planta-
tions on the American coast, and had suggested to the
Puritans of England that by emigrating to America
they might not only escape from their foes, but estab-
lish, in a new world, those principles of civil freedom
and pure worship for which they were contending with
little success in their native land.
The first company who left their homes in the mother-
country to establish a Puritan plantation in New Eng-
land sailed in 1628, and, under the leadership of Endi-
cott, established themselves at Salem. They had been
twice re-enforced, when a much larger company came
with Winthrop in 1630, and settled first at Charles-
town, and afterward at Boston. To induce Winthrop
and other gentlemen of capacity and wealth to engage
personally in this enterprise, the Company of Massa-
chusetts Bay generously offered to transfer to New
England the government of the plantations which had
been or might be formed there, by electing a majority
of its directors and its governor from among those
who would engage to emigrate with their families and
estates.
PURITAN EMIGRA TION IN GENERAL, 23
From this time onward the current of emigration was
broad and rapid, stimulated as well by the descriptions
of the New World which the first adventurers sent
back as by the troubles in the mother-country. So
general was the interest in these reports that three
editions of "New England's Plantation'* by Rev.
Francis Higginson, who arrived in Salem in 1629, were
printed during the following year. The stream thus
set in motion did not cease to flow till the civil war had
given the Puritans hope of relief without exile from
their native land.
The project which resulted in the establishment of a
colony at New Haven was undertaken in 1636. Seven
years had then elapsed without a parliament ; the king
was evidently determined not to call another : without
a parliament no check could be put on arbitrary govern-
ment. To all other illegal methods of replenishing the
exchequer, including the sale of monopolies, the de-
mand of loans and benevolences, the collection of ton-
nage and poundage, the imposition of arbitrary and
excessive fines, another had now been added called
ship-money ; the first writ for levying it in London
being issued in 1634, and the exaction being extended
to the whole country in the following year. The tax
was small in amount ; for John Hampden (who, having
already suffered imprisonment for not submitting to a
forced loan, now refused to pay ship-money) was a man
of large wealth, and yet was assessed at only twenty
shillings. But, though small in amount, this new tax
'excited earnest indignation in the minds of thoughtful
patriots, because it was laid without the consent of
those who were to pay it.
24 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
The Star-Chamber, instead of relaxing its severity,
had of late in numerous instances punished with ruin-
ous fines, and with imprisonment of which no one could
foresee the end, those who resisted the exactions of the
government, or even ventured to speak of them with
too strong disapproval. Thus in 1630, Richard Cham-
bers, a merchant of London, smarting under a sense of
the wrong he suffered in having a bale of silk confis-
cated because he would not pay the duty illegally de-
manded, was heard to say that merchants had more
encouragement, and were less screwed and wrung, in
Turkey than in England. For this ebullition of temper
he was fined two thousand pounds. In the same year
Alexander Leighton, a Scotch clergyman, was sentenced,
for publishing a book entitled, " An Appeal to the Par-
liament ; or, Sion's Plea against Popery," to be twice
publicly whipped, to stand two hours in the pillory, to
have his ears cut off, to have his nostrils slit, to be
branded in the cheek with the letters S.S. to denote a
sower of sedition, and to be imprisoned for life. He lay
in prison ten years, and until he was released by the
Long Parliament. In 1634 Prynne, a Puritan lawyer,
being prosecuted before the same tribunal for publish-
ing a book against plays, masquerades, &c., which was
thought to reflect severely upon the royal court where
such amusements were in vogue, was sentenced to pay
a fine of five thousand pounds, to stand twice in the
pillory, to lose his ears, and to remain a prisoner for
life. He employed the leisure of his prison in writing
another book, for which he suffered, by decree of the
Star-Chamber, another mutilation. This second pun-
ishment, however, did not take place till after the com-
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL. 2$
pany, which planted the colony of New Haven, had left
behind them the shores of England.
The High Commission, which had cognizance of
ecclesiastical offences, punished the Puritans for disobe-
dience to bishops, as the Star-Chamfeer did for ofEences
against the royal prerogative. This tribunal did not,
indeed, mutilate its victims, and so far forth was less
inhuman than the Star-Chamber. The fines which it
exacted from non-conformists for their irregularities
were not so large as the fines imposed by the other
court, or by this same court in cases of immorality com-
mitted by rich men ; but the reason doubtless was, that
the non-conformists were men of moderate means.
Those who suffered for non-conformity were, in many
cases, clergymen without income save what they de-
rived from their benefices. To such a man, the sentence
of the ecclesiastical court, ejecting him from his living,
was as severe as a ruinous fine would be upon a mer-
chant. But, in truth, fines and imprisonment were often
added to the sentence of deprivation which took from
the clergyman and his family their daily bread. For
example, Peter Smart, a prebendary of Durham, having
inveighed in a sermon against innovations recently
made in his cathedral, such as the change of the com-
munion-table into an altar, and the restoration of some
images and pictures which had been removed in the
reign of Elizabeth, was fined five hundred pounds, com-
mitted to prison, and ordered to recant. For neglect-
ing to recant, he was fined again, deprived of his pre-
bend, degraded from orders, and excommunicated.'
He was at last released by the Long Parliament, after
eleven years confinement.
* Fuller's Church History.
26 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The elevation of Laud to the primacy, in 1633, in-
creased the troubles of the Puritans. Abbot had
shielded them in his own diocese, and had encouraged,
at least indirectly, other bishops to do likewise. But
now there was no such shield in any diocese from the
fury with which Laud assailed, not only all who deviated
in any particular from the ceremonies prescribed by
law, but even those who, being careful to conform in all
things legally required, opposed the changes in the fur-
niture and services of the church, ordained by the Privy
Council at the instigation of Laud. Puritan clergymen
in larger numbers than before were imprisoned. Some,
having reason to expect a similar fate, concealed them-
selves and, when opportunity offered, secretly embarked
for New England. It was under pressure of this kind
that most of the ministers who came over between 1628
and 1640 decided to leave their native land.
Though the clergy were more exposed than the laity
to the storm of persecution, the latter were not exempt.
If the spies of the High Commission discovered a con-
venticle, — as a worshipping assembly in which the cere-
monies did not conform to those of the Church of
England was called, — not only the officiating minister,
but all who were present, were seized, and imprisoned
till on their oaths they had purged themselves of all
non-conformity, or till the court was pleased to release
them.
Such was the condition of England which induced
the Puritan emigrants to exile themselves from their
native country, and encounter the perils of the sea and
of the wilderness. Colonization produced by such
PURITAN EMIGRATION IN GENERAL. 2/
causes peopled New England with a superior popula-
tion. The colonists were, as a class, intelligent, moral,
religious, heroic. " God sifted a whole nation, that he
might send choice grain over into this wilderness." '
' William Stoughton, Election Sermon, 1668.
CHAPTER IL
EVENTS WHICH INFLUENCED SOME OF THE FIRST PLANT-
ERS OF NEW HAVEN TO REMOVE FROM THEIR NATIVE
LAND TO NEW ENGLAND.
ON the sixth day of October, 1624, a general vestry
was holden in St. Stephen's Church, Coleman
Street, London, for the election of a new incumbent ;
this being one of the few parishes in England where
the right of presentation is vested in the parishioners.
Of seventy-three votes, John Davenport, a curate in a
contiguous parish, received all but three or four. He
had held this curacy about six years, and was now re-
garded as one of the ablest preachers in the city. " He
was reported," says the Bishop of London, in reply to
a letter in which Sir Richard Conway interceded for
Davenport's induction, "to be factious and popular,'
and to draw after him great congregations and assem-
blies of common and mean people." Endowed with
imagination, earnest in his piety, Calvinistic in his
theology, possessing the full strength of manhood with
no abatement of the fervor of youth, he was a great
favorite with the merchants, tradesfolk, and artisans,
whose dwellings were in Coleman Street and other
* The bishop meant that Davenport did not stand for the king's pre-
ipgative.
28
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN, 29
Streets since surrendered entirely to business. His ad-
mirers were almost universally of that class of English-
men whose representatives in Parliament so much
displeased King James by presenting a list of griev-
ances whenever he asked for money. Therefore to be
popular, whether it means to be on the side of the
people or to be regarded by the people with favor, was
to be suspected at court.
It was soon found that something stood in the way of
Davenport's induction. The young preacher had been
traduced to the king as a Puritan, or as puritanically
affected ; and the king had spoken of him to the bishop
of London in such terms that the bishop was unwilling
to induct him into the benefice to which he had been
elected. The charge of puritanism, if it meant that
Davenport did not conform to all the prescribed cere-
monies of the Church, had no foundation at this early
date. The accusation had probably proceeded from
one of the king's pages, who, having been reproved by
Davenport for profane swearing, either innocently ad-
judged him for that reason to be a Puritan, or revenge-
fully applied an opprobrious epithet to prejudice his
reprover in the king's esteem.
Davenport's friends, however, were not all " common
and mean people." At his solicitation, seconded by
that of Lady Mary Vere, his cause was undertaken by
her brother-in-law Sir Richard Conway, principal secre-
tary to his majesty, who conciliated the king, and per-
suaded the bishop to proceed to the induction, which
took place before the date of the following certificate,
indorsed in the handwriting of Davenport on a copy of
"The Thirty-Nine Articles," now in the library of the
American Antiquarian Society at Worcester : —
30 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
« Novemb. 7th 1624.
'^John Davenporte, Clerk, Vicar of St Stephen's in Coleman
Street, London, did, this day above written, being Sunday, pub-
liquely read this booke of Articles herein Contayned, being in
number 39 besides the ratificacion, and declared his full and un-
feigned assent and consent thereunto in the tyme of morning
Prayer, next after the Second Lesson, before the whole Congre-
gacion. As also the sayd John did, the same day, administer the
Holy Communion in the sayd parish, in his surplis, according to
y« order prescribed by y« Church of England ; in the presence of
these whose names are here underwritten."
The certificate is signed by one of the church-wardens
and seven other parishioners, and was doubtless given
on the first Sunday after his induction.
The first two or three years of Davenport's incum-
bency were prosperous and comparatively peaceful. So
far as can be ascertained, he conformed as faultlessly as
in his curacy at St. Lawrence's, where, as he declares
in a letter to Secretary Conway, he " baptized many, but
never without the sign of the cross ; monthly adminis-
tered the sacrament of the Lord's Supper, but at no
time without the surplice, nor to any but those that
kneeled."
In 1627 he brought himself into trouble by uniting
with other ministers in a circular letter soliciting con-
tributions for the oppressed Protestants of the Upper
Palatinate. Laud, who was now the principal adviser of
the king, was displeased with the signers of the letter
for such sympathy with Presbyterians, and caused them
to be reprimanded in the Star-Chamber.
The translation of Laud in 1628, to the see of Lon-
don, brought greater peril of collision between him and
the Calvinistic vicar of St. Stephen's. What was Daven-
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 3 1
port's first offence, is not known ; but how soon he was
summoned before the High Commission, appears from
the following extract from one of his letters to Lady
Vere : —
** London, June 30, 1628.
''Madam, — Since my recovery out of a dangerous sickness,
which held me for a week or a fortnight before Shrovetide to as
long after Easter, for which I return most humble thanks to the
God of my life, the Father of mercies, I have had divers purposes
of writing to your honor, only I delayed in hope to write some-
what concerning the event and success of our High Commission
troubles ; but I have hoped in vain : for to this day we are in the
same condition as before, — delayed till the finishing of this session
in Parliament, which now is unhappily concluded without any satis*
fying contentment to the king or commonwealth. Threatenings
were speedily revived against us by the new Bishop of London,
Dr. Laud, even the next day after the conclusion of their session.
We expect a fierce storm from the enraged spirit of the two bishops.
Ours, as I am informed, hath a particular aim at me upon a former
quarrel : so that I expect ere long to be deprived of my pastoral
charge in Coleman Street. But I am in God's hands, not in theirs ;
to whose good pleasure I do contentedly and cheerfully commit
myself.' "
In January, 163 1, he was required to answer certain
charges brought against him by Timothy Hood, some
time his curate. Hood had been dismissed for not
complying with the requirement that he should reside
within the parish, and, according to Davenport's rela-
tion of the case, had become incensed against him for
that reason. One of the charges was, that the vicar
had sometimes administered the sacrament to commu-
nicants who did not kneel, and the accusation was
brought to a fine edge by the specification of Mrs. Dav-
enport as one of the said communicants.
* Birch MSB., 4275.
32 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
The vicar replied to this objection against him, that
the parish contained about fourteen hundred communi-
cants, and that, the chancel being small, it was a matter
of necessity to administer to the communicants from
pew to pew, and that the pews were sometimes so filled
that it was impossible to kneel ; that when he had ob-
served some to sit, that might conveniently kneel, he
had advised them to kneel ; that, in case of refusal
to kneel, he had refused to administer the sacrament to
the party so refusing. The specification concerning his
wife, he meets by testifying that she had received the
sacrament at his hand, kneeling, many times, and that
the curate had "not acquainted him, the said John
Davenport, that he observed any such thing concerning,
his wife " as was charged.
It is evident from this disingenuous but doubtless
literally true statement, that some of Davenport's
parishioners, including his own wife, were at this time
non-conformists, and that he had winked at their irregu-
larity. It does not appear, however, that he himself
had any scruple about kneeling, or had personally
omitted any required ceremony.
The complaint seems to have resulted in nothing
worse than a private admonition from his bishop. It
was probably the conference between Laud and Daven-
port in reference to this complaint to which the prelate
referred, when, in his report of the diocese of London
for that part of the year 1633 which elapsed before his
elevation to the primacy, he said, "Since my return
from Scotland, Mr. John Davenport, vicar of St.
Stephen's in Coleman Street (whom I used with all
moderation, and about two years since thought I had
t
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 33
settled his judgment, having him then at advantage
enough to have put extremity upon him, but forbore
it), hath now resigned his vicarage, declared his judg-
ment against conformity with the Church of England,
and is since gone (as I hear) to Amsterdam." To his
moderation with Davenport in Reference to the com-
plaint of Hood, the prelate again referred in his defence,
when on trial for his life, before the Long Parliament.
One charge being, that he had forced Davenport to flee
from his parish and from the country, he said in reply :
" The truth is, my lords, and 'tis well known, and to
some of his best friends, that I preserved him once
before, and my Lord Vere came, and gave me thanks
for it."
About one year after Davenport had escaped from
this danger. Laud discovered the existence of a com-
pany, whose design was to purchase such advowsons as,
having been impropriated to laymen in the time of
Henry the Eighth, were now for sale, in order that the
trustees, or, as they were styled, feoffees^ of the com-
pany might present for induction men whom they
regarded as orthodox, that is, as Calvinists. The com-
pany had been in operation for some years, and had
already purchased several impropriations with money
contributed for that purpose. The discovery of the
project excited Laud vehemently. He hated Calvinists,
whether conforming or non-conforming ; partly for their
theology, and partly for their almost invariable adhe-
sion to the popular side in the contest between the
Commons and the king. It was part of his plan of
administration to exclude them from preferment ; so
that this company was, in his estimation, an organized
34 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
attempt to frustrate his plans. Davenport was one of
the feoffees of this company, and, as such, participated
in the heavy displeasure of the man who in the king's
name ruled both Church and State. He and his asso-
ciates were apprehensive that they might be proceeded
against in the Star-Chamber, and punished with ruinous
fines ; but Laud, having caused the corporation to be
dissolved and its property to be confiscated, abstained
from further vengeance. When the prosecution was
brought to an end, Davenport recorded in his Bible his
thanks to God for deliverance from the thing he feared.
The policy of excluding Calvinists from church pre-
ferment, even if faultless in their conformity, natu-
rally forced conforming clergymen of that school of
theology into closer sympathy with non-conformists,
and into a wider estrangement from Laud and his
associates. Doctrinal Puritans, as Calvinists were now
called, finding themselves proscribed by their ecclesi-
astical superiors, began to feel the force of the reasons
which the ceremonial Puritans alleged for not conform-
ing. Perhaps the suppression of the company of which
he had been a trustee, and the confiscation of its prop-
erty, turned the scales with which Davenport weighed
these reasons. However this may be, it appears from
his own testimony that he was " first staggered in his
conformity, and afterward fully taken off, by set con-
ferences and debates, which himself and sundry other
ministers obtained with Mr. John Cotton, then driven
from Boston [in Lincolnshire] on account of his
non-conformity.
For several months he absented himself from the
communion-service celebrated monthly in his church.
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 35
but might perhaps in time have relapsed into conform-
ity. The tidings which came on Sunday, Aug. 4, 1633,
that the old Calvinistic Archbishop of Canterbury,
George Abbot, was dead, seem to have brought him to
a decision. Abbot had been decidedly friendly to Cal-
vinists who conformed, and not very severe against
those who were guilty of some slight aberrations from
the ritual. His brother, Sir Maurice Abbot, afterward
lord mayor, was a parishioner of St. Stephen's, and had
sometimes spread over Davenport the shield of the
archbishop's protection. . But the primate was now
dead, and the succession of Laud cast its shadow be-
fore. On Monday Davenport left the city ; and on
Tuesday Laud, returning from his missionary tour to
Scotland, was saluted by the king as "my Lord of
Canterbury." Davenport, after lying in concealment
for about three months, escaped to Holland "disguised
in a gray suit and an overgrown beard." '
We learn from one of his letters to the representative
of the king of Great Britain, resident at the Hague, that
when he went into that country he intended to remain
only three or four months and then return to his native
land. He cannot have expected that the storm which
had driven him into exile would so soon subside entirely,
or even sufficiently to permit him to resume his work as
a Puritan preacher in England. Some thoughts may
have been in his mind of undertaking in 1634 what he
accomplished in 1637. He had been interested in the
Massachusetts Bay Company as early certainly as 1629,
having contributed money to procure the charter which
the king signed in that year, and had continued from
' Letter of Stephen Goffe, dated 1633, Dec. ^.
36 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
that time to meet with its directors and to act on its
committees. A short absence might be considered ex-
pedient to allow the vigilance of his enemies to abate
before he should organize an expedition. Nevertheless
any project of leading a colony from England to
America, which he may have entertained when he
landed in Holland, was so vague that he listened to a
proposal to settle permanently in Amsterdam.
If for a time he cherished the thought of finding a
home in Holland, he had doubtless relinquished it as
early as 1635, for in that year his family returned to
England. He followed them, probably in the summer
or autumn of 1636 ; for the organization of a company
of emigrants was so far forwarded in January of the
following year that they had chartered a vessel, " made
ready all their provisions and passengers, fitting both
for the said voyage and plantation, and most of them
thereupon engaged their whole estates." ^
While these preparations were in progress, Daven-
port doubtless kept himself out of sight as much as he
conveniently could, both on his own account, and for
the sake of the expedition. Years afterward, Laud,
alluding to him and his escape to New England, ex-
claimed, "My arm shall reach him even there." If it
had been known that those who had chartered "the
good ship Hector," to carry them to New England, and
had engaged their whole estates in preparing for the
voyage, were to have the former vicar of St. Stephen's
as their leader, their undertaking might have been ex-
tinguished with as little regard to the rights of property
' Petition of the Owners and Freighters of the Good Ship called the
Hector of London. State Papers : ColoniaL
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 37
as that of Xht feoffees had been. It did, indeed, become
known at last that Davenport had returned. The vicar-
general of the Bishop of London, reporting his visita-
tion of the diocese, writes from Braintree, March 6,
" Mr. Davenport hath lately been in these parts, and at
Hackney, not long since. I am told that he goeth in
gray, like a country gentleman." We may infer from
what this reporter relates, that Davenport had not
shown himself much in public, and, from his silence in
reference to the expedition to New England, that he
had heard nothing of Davenport's connection with it.
About twelve months before Davenport fled from
London, Samuel Eaton and John Lathrop,^ two non-
conforming clergymen, were imprisoned by the High
Commission for holding conventicles. With the con-
nivance of the jailer, Eaton continued to hold conventi-
cles after his incarceration, as appears from a document
preserved among the English State Papers, and here
subjoined : —
" To the most Reverend Father in God, William, Lord Archbishop
of Canterbury, his grace, Primate and Metropolitan of all Eng-
land:—
"Humbly sheweth: — The most humble petition of Francis
Tucker, Bachelor of Divinity, and prisoner in Newgate for debt.
That whereas there is one Samuel Eaton, prisoner in Newgate,
committed by your grace for a schismatical and dangerous fellow;
that the said Eaton hath held divers conventicles within the said
gaol, some whereof hath been to the number of seventy persons
or more, and that he was permitted by the said keeper openly and
publicly to preach unto them ; and that the said Eaton hath often-
* Lathrop had formerly been vicar of Egerton in Kent, but now was
the teacher of a congregation of Separatists in London. Egerton had
become a stronghold of Puritanism.
38 • HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
times affirmed in his said sermons that baptism was the doctrine of
devils, and its original was an institution from the devil ; and often-
times he would rail against your grace, affirming that all bishops
were heretics, blasphemers, and antichristian. That the said
keeper, having notice hereof by the petitioner, who desired him
to be a means that these great resorts and conventicles might be
prevented, and that he would reprove the said Eaton for the same,
and remove him to some other place of the prison. That hereupon
the said keeper, in a disdainful manner, replied that the petitioner
should meddle with what he had to do ; and if he did dislike the
said Eaton and his conventicles, he would remove the petitioner
into some worse place of the prison. That at this time there was a
conventicle of sixty persons or more ; that the said keeper coming
into the room where the conventicle was, and the said Eaton
preaching unto them and maintaining dangerous opinions, having
viewed the said assembly, he said there was a very fair and goodly
company; and staying there some season, departed without any
distaste thereat, to the great encouragement of the said Eaton and
the said persons to frequent the said place. That the said keeper
had a strict charge from the said commission to have a special care
of the said Eaton; and that since, the said keeper hath several
times permitted him to go abroad to preach to conventicles ap-
pointed by him, the said Eaton. That daily there doth resort to
the said Eaton much people to hear him preach. That the said
petitioner reproving the said keeper for the said contempt, he
thereupon abused him with uncivil language, and further; caused
the said Eaton to abuse the petitioner, not only with most abusive
words, but also with blows. "
Eaton and Lathrop were probably released on bail,
for the court after calling them several times finally
decreed, Feb. 19, 1635, ^^^it for their contempt in not
appearing to answer charges touching their holding
conventicles, their bonds should be certified, and they
attached and committed. Lathrop, fortunately for him,
was already in New England, having arrived at Boston
with thirty-two of his congregation Sept. 18, 1634.
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 39
Eaton, having lain in concealment till the return of
Davenport from- Holland, became his associate in the
voyage to America. Perhaps he was drawn into such
association by personal friendship, as well as by the
peril to which they were exposed in common ; for both
were natives of Coventry, where Eaton's father, a bene-
ficed clergyman, had been the religious teacher and
guide of Davenport's childhood and youth.
Theophilus Eaton, an older brother of Samuel Eaton,
was so nearly of the age of Davenport that they had
been schoolmates and intimate friends in Coventry.
Intended by his parents for the church, he had become a
merchant in London. Respected for his character and
for his success in business, he was elected at an early
age Deputy Governor of the Fellowship of Eastland
Merchants, and sent by them, as their agent, to super-
intend their affairs and promote their interests in the
countries bordering on the Baltic. Returning after an
absence of three years, he became a parishioner of his
friend, the vicar of St. Stephen's. Already so much a
Puritan that he had scrupled when abroad at the lawful-
ness of drinking toasts, he was probably, when Daven-
port resigned his vicarage, as far advanced as he in non-
conformity. The idea of expatriation had, perhaps,
become less repulsive to his mind by reason of his long
connection with the company of Massachusetts Bay, of
which he was one of the original patentees, and to which
he, like Davenport, had liberally given time and money.
The acquaintance he had made with the court of High
Commission through the recent experience of his brother
Samuel, and perhaps through personal experience as his
brother's bondsman, would naturally incline him to put
40 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
himself and his children beyond its jurisdiction. He
not only joined the expedition, but acted so important a
part in its history, that he and Davenport have been
styled its Moses and Aaron.
Theophilus Elaton was living at this time with his
second wife, whose daughter by a former husband was
married to Edward Hopkins, a Puritan merchant of
London. Hopkins much esteemed his wife's step-
father, and resolved to accompany him to America.
Two young men, David Yale and Thomas Yale, sons of
Mrs. Eaton, were also of the company.
John Evance, a London merchant and a parishioner
of St. Stephen's, was present at the general vestr}'^ when
Davenport was elected vicar in October, 1624. He had
been married in May of the same year to Anne Young.
It has been assumed by some writers that many of the
New Haven planters had been parishioners of Daven-
port in London. He was so popular and prominent a
preacher, that probably all of the company who had
lived in London had heard him preach ; but of the
seventy-three persons present at the general vestry in
October, 1624, only one is known to have come with
Davenport to New Haven. Theophilus Eaton may have
been a parishioner thus early ; but, even if so, was prob-
ably absent at that time in the East countries. Other
New Haven names than those of Evance and Eaton
are found on the parish register of St. Stephen's ; but
the names are such as might be found elsewhere in
England, and most of the persons who brought them
to America are known to have crossed the Atlantic at
an earlier or a later date than Eaton, Evance, and
Davenport.
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 4 1
Besides these who were related to Davenport, as his
former parishioners, or to Theophilus Eaton by family
ties, several citizens of London joined the company.
Not all of them can now be distinguished from those
who came from other parts of the kingdom, but there is
more or less authority for including in such a list the
names of Stephen Goodyear, Richard Malbon, Thomas
Gregson, William Peck, Robert Newman, Francis New-
man, and Ezekiel Cheever.
The London men with their families forming the
nucleus of the company, other families or companies
from the rural counties became united with it. One
group of families came from Kent, or, in other words,
from the diocese of Canterbury, which, three years
before, by the death of Archbishop Abbot, had fallen
under the immediate administration of Laud. Abbot
was, like the Puritans, a Calvinist in his theology ; like
them he was in sympathy with the reformed churches
of the Continent, continuing to tolerate the French
refugees, who from the time of Elizabeth had main-
tained worship according to the forms of their own
church within his diocese and even in the basement
of his cathedral ; like them he believed in the sanctifi-
cation of the Lord's day, preventing the reading, in the
parish church of Croydon where he was residing at
the time, of King James's proclamation which allowed
and encouraged athletic games on the afternoon of Sun-
day. It was natural that a man so much in sympa-
thy with the Puritans should deal leniently with them
in regard to their deviations from ritual regularity.
He was loath to deprive the Church of its most instruc-
42 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
tive and influential preachers, and hoped by mild treat-
ment to bring them back to conformity.
Upon the accession of Laud, there was an immediate
and radical change in the administration of the diocese.
In the reports which he rendered annually to the
king, the primate complains, both in 1634 and 1635, of
a part of Kent around Ashford, as specially infected
with distemper against the Church. In his account for
1636, he said, —
" I have every year acquainted your majesty, and so must do
now, that there are still about Ashford and Egerton divers Brown-
ists and other Separatists. But they are so very mean and poor
people, that we know not what to do with them. They are said to
be the disciples of one Turner and Fenner, who were long since
apprehended by order of your Majesty's High Commission Court.
But how this part came to be so infected with such a humor of
separation, I know not, unless it were by too much connivance at
their first beginning. Neither do I see any remedy like to be,
unless some of their chief seducers be driven to abjure the king-
dom ; which must be done by the judges at the common law, but is
not in our power."
On the margin of the paper containing this account
the king wrote, " Inform me of the particulars, and I
shall command the judges to make them abjure."
Among the English State Papers is a " Book of Rough
Notes " by the king's secretary, containing these and
other memoranda : —
" 163^ Jan. 6. — Proceedings of the Council at their several meet-
ings during, this month beginning this day.
** Jan. 21. — A catalogue of books written by anabaptists.
*^ That the statute of abjuration may be put in execution against
some principal men. That the judges be spoken with against
Fenner and Turner.
EMIGRATION OF PLANTERS OF NEW HAVEN 43
" Speak with Lord Keeper and Mr. Attorney to draw a procla-
mation for altering the style or date of the year to begin in Januar>'.
"Jan. 25. — To mind the Lords and Lord Keeper to speak with
the judges and Mr. Attorney about altering the date of year [of]
our Lord ; that it may begin the first of January as in other king-
doms.
" And about putting the statute of abjuration ; to be put in exe-
cution against Fenner and Turner.
" Mr. Attorney is to speak with tlie judges about the date [of]
beginning the new year."
From these documents it is evident that the attention
of Laud was turned in 1636, and the beginning of the
following year, to the Separatists about Ashford and
Egerton in Kent, and that he attempted to have the
statute of abjuration put in execution against them.
Such a movement of one so powerful and so relentless
accounts for the emigration of the Kentish men, who,
according to tradition, came with Davenport, or two
years later with Whitfield, bringing so many family
names identical with the names inscribed in the church-
yards of Kent.'
Another company came from Hereford, a shire in the
West of England, bordering on Wales, The particular
events which moved them to leave their homes at that
time are yet to seek ; but it is known that they left
' The writer may be excused for specifying two brothers of his own
name, whose ancestral home, though in another parish, was less than two
miles from Egerton Church and in full view of its massive tower. Joshua
Atwater, the elder of the two, had established himself as " a mercer " at
Ashford. David Atwater, from whom all in America who hear that family
name are descended, had not completed his twenty-second year when he
landed in America. They had buried their father in November, 1636, and
their mother in the following January; and, being thus liberated fiom
filial duties, joined the expedition with their sister, the only surviving
member of the family besides themselves.
44 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
under the influence and guidance of Peter Prudden, a
clergj^man of Hereford, well known to all of them by
reputation, if not by personal knowledge of him as a
preacher and pastor. Probably they learned through
him of the expedition originated by Davenport and his
friends, and became, through his agency, members of
the association which, leaving London in April, 1637,
founded New Haven in April, 1638. The fact that
after they had belonged to the association more than
two years, after they *had resided some months in the
new plantation, after some of them had built for them-
selves houses, and had left behind them the hardest of
the hardships incident to such an enterprise, they sepa-
rated themselves from their associates, removed to Mil-
ford, and settled in a town by themselves, with Prudden
for their minister, evinces the strength and permanence
of their attachment to the man whom they followed in
leaving their homes in England. The Herefordshire
people, for reasons which will appear hereafter, can be
with more certainty distinguished from their fellow-
passengers, and grouped together, than those from
Kent or those from London.
CHAPTER III.
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR.
IT was a great undertaking for the company which
gradually gathered around Davenport and the Eatons,
to prepare for a voyage across the Atlantic, and a per-
manent residence in the New World. The ministers
could perhaps embark, with their books and household-
stuflf, in a few days ; but merchants engaged in foreign
commerce needed several months, after deciding to emi-
grate, for the conversion of their capital into money, or
into merchandise suitable for the adventure in which
they were engaging.
But this company projected something more than
emigration. They were not to scatter themselves,
when they disembarked, among the different settle-
ments already established in New England, but to
remain together, and lay the foundation of a new and
isolated community. For this reason a more compre-
hensive outfit was necessary than if they had expected
to become incorporated, individually or collectively, in
communities already planted. In addition to the stores
shipped by individuals, there must be many things
provided for the common good, by persons acting in
behalf of the whole company. There is evidence, that,
after the expedition arrived at New Haven, its affairs
45
46 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
were managed like those of a joint-stock association,
and therefore some ground for believing, that, from the
beginning, those who agreed to emigrate in this com-
pany, or at least some of them, associated themselves
together as partners in the profit and loss of the adven-
ture.
Higginson, some years before, had advised emigrants
that " it were a wise course for those that are of abilities
to join together and buy a ship for the voyage ; " alleging
as a reason, that transportation was so dear as five
pounds a man, and ten pounds a horse, and commonly
three pounds for every ton of goods. " All that come,"
he says, "must have victuals with them for a twelve-
month." Still earlier, Winslow had written from
Plymouth, "Bring good store of clothes and bedding
with you. Bring paper and linseed-oil for your windows,
with cotton-yam for your lamps."
These directions, intended in both cases for emigrants
coming to join communities already established, illus-
trate the need of studious foresight and careful co-
operation in a company of persons proposing not only
to remove to New England, but to begin a new and
independent plantation.
Davenport and Eaton had learned by experience, in
fitting out vessels for the Massachusetts Bay Company,
what would be needed in a new settlement, and were
as well qualified, perhaps, as any could be, to prepare a
.list of necessary articles. The Abigail, the first ship
which came to Salem, brought ten thousand bricks as
ballast ; and bricks 'with " London " stamped on them
were found at the demolition of a very ancient house in
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR. 47
New Haven." It is not certain that the vessel in which
Davenport and Eaton embarked, was, like the Abigail,
ballasted with bricks ; but the fact that bricks were
sometimes brought from England illustrates the care
with which emigrant-ships were fitted out. The Abi-
gail brought also sea-coals, but all freighters must have
soon learned that it was useless to carry fuel to a coun-
try so well timbered as New England. An emigrant-
ship was further ballasted with iron, steel, lead, nails, and
other heavy articles of utility. The bulk of the cargo
consisted of apparel, bedding, food, tools, arms, ammu-
nition, and seeds. Neat-cattle and goats were usually
taken, and sometimes horses. The Massachusetts Bay
Company had a rule, that a ship of two hundred tons
should not carry above one hundred passengers, and
other ships were limited after the same proportion.
In the summer of 1636, several vessels recently ar-
rived from England being in the harbor of Boston,
Thomas Miller, the master's mate of one of them, was
apprehended and brought before the Governor and
Council, for saying, to some who came on board, that
the colonists were traitors and rebels because they did
not display the king's colors at the fort. The ship on
which this insufferable speech was spoken was the
Hector of London, William Femes, master. Sailing
from Boston in July, she was chartered after her arrival
* The writer remembers to have seen some of these bricks taken from
the Atwater house of which Dr. Dana in his Century Sermon speaks as
built by Joshua Atwater, one of the emigrants. I think, however, that the
house was built by a nephew of Joshua Atwater. Certainly ThomasAtt-
water (as be chose to write his name), who in Dr. Dana's time occupied
the house, was not descended from Joshua Atwater, but from his brother
DaTid.
48 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
in London by the company whose origin has been re-
lated in the preceding chapter. While they were pre-
paring her for another voyage to Boston, she was seized
by the Lords of the Admiralty for the king's service, as
will appear from the following petition without date, but
indorsed, " Received January, 1637 : " —
" To the Right Honorable the Lords and other Commissioners of
his Majesty's High Court of Admiralty : —
"The humble petition of the Owners and Freighters of the
good ship called the Hector of London,
" Humbly showeth unto your honors that your petitioners having
contracted for a voyage with the said ship from here to New Eng-
land for a plantation there, and from there to divers parts- in the
Streights, the freighters have made ready all their provisions and
passengers, fitting both for the said voyage and plantation, and
most of them thereupon engaged their whole estates and paid part
of their moneys. Since which agreement and preparation made,
the said ship is impressed for his Majesty's service whereby she is
hindered from proceeding on the said intended voyage.
" Their most humble suit therefore is that in respect of the peti-
tioners* great charges already arisen before the impressing of the
ship, and her not proceeding on her voyage will tend to the great
loss, if not utter undoing of divers of your honors' suppliants, and
for that, if it pleased God the ship do safely retume, the Custom
to his Majesty of the goods to be imported in her from the Streights
hither will amount to jfsooo at the least, your Lordships would be
pleased to give order and warrant for the release of the said ship
from her impression that so she may proceed on her said voyage,
" And they as in duty bound shall daily pray."
This petition was supported by the following certifi-
cate, signed by Samuel Hutchinson, Richard Hutchin-
son, and Arthur Hollingworth, who were perhaps the
owners of the Hector: —
" We whose names are hereunto subscribed do hereby certify
that the good ship called the Hector of London was contracted for,
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR, 49
for a voyage, and that provision was made and provided before the
said ship was impressed for the king's Majesty's service. In testi-
mony whereof we have hereunder set our names the nineteenth of
January A. D. 1637."
On the 23d of the same month the Secretary of the
Admiralty wrote to Sir William Russell, through whom
the petition, with others of like import, had reached
them, as follows : —
" Sir, — The Lords Commissioners for the Admiralty (having
perused your letter of the 21st of this month touching the mer-
chant ships ordered to be taken up for his Majesty's service) have
commanded me to signify to you that they think it not fit to release
any of the said ships upon the pretences expressed in your letter
(albeit the same may be true) in regard they perceive by your letter
that there are not at present any merchant ships in the Thames fit
to send in their places. But when you shall certify their Lordships
that there are other merchant ships in the river of the like burden
and force, fit for his Majesty's service that may be completely fitted
and ready by the 20th of April next, their Lordships will consider
further of the allegations of the owners of the four ships men-
tioned in your said letter and declare their further pleasure there-
upon."
Not entirely discouraged by this reply, the captain of
the Hector presented another petition without date, but
indorsed, "1637, February 14:" —
" To the Right Honorable the Lords and other Commissioners of
the Admiralty.: —
"The humble petition of William Femes, master of the ship
called the Hector,
"Humbly showeth that whereas the petitioner hath been an
humble suitor to your honors for the releasing of the said ship ;
for that there was a contract and provision was made for a voyage
long before, which tends to the ruin of many, except your honors
be pleased to give order for her discharge; for that there are
so HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
divers ships come in more fit and able for his Majesty's service^
viz., the Vinty about 300 tons and 22 pieces of ordnance; the
Royal Defence 300 tons and upwards, with 22 pieces of ordnance ;
the Pleiades 350 tons, 26 ordnance ; Prudence 370 tons, 28 pieces
ordnance ; one whereof Mr. Wise is master, 350 tons and 2.^ pieces
of ordnance ;
" His humble suit therefore is that your honors will please to give
order that the said ship called the Hector may be discharged for
the reasons aforesaid, that she may go on in her intended voyage,
" And the petitioner with many others shall pray."
Ultimately, the Hector was released ; and from an
order of the king in council, that the Pleiades, with
other impressed vessels, should be ready for sea on the
25th of April, it may be inferred that she was substi-
tuted for the Hector. The reader will have noticed
that the names of the freighters are withheld in all these
negotiations for the release of their ship. It is alleged
that many will suffer, and perhaps be undone, but there
is nothing to call attention to any individuals as engaged
in the enterprise.
The lords of the council were not ignorant that con-
siderable emigration to New England Had already taken
place, or that the exodus still continued ; but they be-
lieved that those who went were for the most part poor
and mean people, who would be of little advantage at
home and might, if colonized, be of use by increasing
foreign commerce. Moreover they were unaware how
strongly this emigration was leavened with Puritanism.
If they had known that several wealthy merchants of
London, inclined to non-conformity, had embarked their
whole estates in the Hector, and were intending to
go to New England with their families to find there a
permanent residence, they would have found means to
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR. 51
frustrate the undertaking. On the 30th of April proc-
lamation was made, "that the king — being informed
that great numbers of his subjects are yearly trans-
ported into those parts of America which have been
granted by patent to several persons, and there settle
themselves, some of them with their families and whole
estates, amongst whom are many idle and refractory
humors, whose only or principal end is to live without
the reach of authority — doth command his officers and
ministers of the ports, not to sufEer any persons, being
subsidy men or of their value, to pass to any of those
plantations without a license from his Majesty's com-
missioners for plantations first obtained ; nor any under
the degree of subsidy men, without a certificate from
two justices of .the peace where they lived, that they
have taken the oaths of allegiance and supremacy, and
a testimony from the minister of the parish, of their
conformity to the orders and discipline of the Church of
England." As the Hector arrived in Boston on the
26th of June, we may infer from the date of this proclama-
tion that it was issued immediately after she had sailed,
and that it was occasioned by the discovery of the true
nature of an expedition in which several persons, being
subsidy men, or of their value, had clandestinely left the
kingdom and carried away their estates.
If the ship was chartered by a joint-stock association,
it does not follow that only shareholders took passage
in her. The Massachusetts Bay Company had a regu-
lar tariff of rates at which they received all freight that
was offered, and all passengers who were approved.
Theophilus Eaton owned a sixteenth of the Arbclla,
which had been purchased expressly for that company's
52 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
service ; and both he and Davenport, as directors of the
company, had become familiar with its methods. The
rates of that company were five pounds for the passage
of an adult, and four pounds for a ton of goods. The
association of adventurers which chartered the Hec-
tor would naturally adopt similar methods and similar
rates. Having secured accommodation for themselves
and their families, and for the freight which belonged to
the association and to the individuals composing it, they
would receive persons not shareholders, at the regular
rates. Some of the emigrants may have been precluded
from taking stock in the association by the expenses of
emigration ; but the originators of the enterprise would •
naturally desire that all who were of sufficient ability
should have a pecuniary interest in its welfare. There
was at least one passenger who did not come as an emi-
grant. Winthrop writes in his journal, " In the Hec-
tor came also the Lord Leigh, son and heir of the Earl
of Marlborough, being about nineteen years of age, who
came only to see the country. He was of very sober
carriage, especially in the ship, where he was much dis-
respected and unworthily used by the master, one Femes,
and some of the passengers ; yet he bore it meekly and
silently." »
Before the Hector sailed, the company which char-
tered her had so increased that it became necessary to
hire another vessel to accompany her on the voyage ;
but the name of the vessel has not been preserved to
us. This unexpected increase was due to the accession
' Winthrop perhaps changed his mind about Lord Leigh, when that
youth, having accepted the governor's invitation to a dinner-party made
expressly to honor him, was persuaded by Harry Vane to absent himself.
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR. 53
of those who have been mentioned as coming from
Kent and from Herefordshire. Concerning the latter,
we have no means of determining when Prudden began
to negotiate with Davenport ; but the men of Kent
appear to have joined the expedition after the Hector
was engaged for the voyage. Their departure was so
hasty that many who wished to go were forced to wait
for another opportunity, and came out two years after-
ward in the first ship which sailed from England direct
to the harbor of New Haven.
No documents have yet been found which indicate
the day when the Hector and her consort sailed from
London,' or the manner in which the officers of the
port discharged their oflScial duty in examining the cer-
tificates of the passengers. Similar requirements to
those prescribed by the proclamation of April 30 had
been made by a proclamation issued more than two
years earlier, but were nevertheless insufficient to pre-
vent the emigration of Puritans. Many found no diffi-
culty in obtaining a bona-fide certificate of conformity,
and it docs not appear that any objected to the oaths
of allegiance and supremacy. If unable to obtain a
certificate from the minister of the parish where they
had lived, they came, some clandestinely, and some
under borrowed names and corresponding passports.
It is said that John Aylmer, Bishop of London in Queen
Elizabeth's time, and an exile for religion in Queen
* Sir Matthew Boynton, who had previously sent out some cattle, and
some servants to care for them, in a letter dated " London, April 12, 1637,"
writes to John Winthrop, jun., " I have sent either of my servants half a
year's wages by Mr. Hopkins, which, I pray you, deliver to them." Proba-
bly this letter came in the Hector with Mr. Hopkins. If so, she sailed
sifter the 12th of ApriL
54 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Mary's reign, was so small of stature, that, when the
searchers were clearing the ship in which he made his
escape, the merchant put him into a great wine-butt
that had a partition in the middle, so that Aylmer was
enclosed in the hinder part while the searchers drank of
the wine which they saw drawn out of the head on the
other part.' The Puritans of the seventeenth century
were capable of exercising equal ingenuity when neces-
sarj' ; but, in a ship full of his friends, a person obnox-
ious to the government might be secreted for an hour
without so much trouble, even if the searching officer
were in sympathy with the lords of the Privy Council.
In many cases, however, the searcher discharged his
duty perfunctorily, and with no earnest desire to dis-
cover and arrest those who embarked without the re-
quired certificates. If ever lists of the passengers in
the Hector and her consort should be discovered, they
will probably not contain the name of John Davenport
or of Samuel Eaton.
Two months was perhaps the average time consumed
in sailing from London to Boston in the vessels of that
day. The Arbella, when she brought Winthrop and his
company, was a little more than two months from
Yarmouth to Salem ; and there is no intimation in his
journal that the voyage was unexpectedly long. Hig-
ginson says, " Our passage was short and speedy ; for
whereas we had three thousand miles English to sail
from Old to New England, we performed the same in
six weeks and three days." A passage was indeed some-
times made in less time, but in other instances was pro-
tracted to three months. A vessel made but one round
* Fuller's Worthies, B. II., 248.
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR. $5
trip in a year, leaving England in the spring and arriv-
ing home in the autumn. Crowded cabins rendered the
passage uncomfortable, even when speedy ; but a pro-
tracted voyage often induced not only discomfort, but
disease.
None of the passengers in the Hector, or in the vessel
which accompanied her, having supplied us with his
journal, we must avail ourselves of diaries of contem-
porary voyages if we would see them in imagination
pursuing their way down the Thames, through the
Channel, and over the Atlantic. Sea-sickness reigned
supreme as they passed along the southern coast of
their native island ; but in the first pleasant weather
after they had gained the open sea, they " fetched out
the children and others, that were sick and lay groan-
ing in the cabins, and, having stretched a rope from the
steerage to the mainmast, made them stand, some on
one side and some on the other, and sway it up and
down till they were warm. By this means they soon
grew well and merry." Afterward, "when the ship
56 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
heaved and set more than usual, a few were sick, but of
these such as came upon deck and stirred themselves
were presently well again ; therefore, our captain set
our children and young men to some harmless exercises
in which the seamen were very active, and did our peo-
ple much good, though they would sometimes play the
wags with them." ' Once or twice during the voyage
the wind blew a gale ; and the passengers being confined
to the cabin united in the observance of a fast with a
protracted service of prayer, which, when the wind sub-
sided, was followed by a service of thanksgiving. " We
constantly served God morning and evening, by reading
and expounding a chapter, singing, and prayer; and
the sabbath was solemnly kept by adding to the former,
preaching twice, and catechising. Besides, the ship-
master and his company used every night to set their
eight and twelve o'clock watches with singing a psalm,
and prayer that was not read out of a book." ^ Some-
times one vessel so far outsailed her consort, that she
must take in some sail, and stay for her, lest the two
should be entirely separated for the remainder of the
voyage. " Our captain, supposing us now to be near
the coast, fitted on a new mainsail, that was very strong
and double, and would not adventure with his old sails as
before, when he had sea-room enough." "This evening
we saw the new moon more than half an hour after
sunset, being much smaller than it is at any time in
England." "About four this morning, we sounded,
and had ground at thirty fathom ; and, it being some-
what calm, we put our ship a-stays, and took, in less
than two hours, with a few hooks, sixty-seven codfish,
* Wbthrop. ■ Higginson.
THE VOYAGE OF THE HECTOR. $y
most of them very great fish. This came very seasona-
bly, for our salt fish was now spent, and we were taking
care for victuals this day, being a fish day." "We had
now fair sunshine weather, and there came a smell off
the shore like the smell of a garden." Four days later,
both the ships lay at anchor, and the weary voyagers
were on shore, some gathering store of fine strawberries,
and others entertained in the houses of friends, who
feasted them with "good venison pasty, and good beer."
{
CHAPTER IV.
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS.
BOSTON in its infancy welcomed all Puritan immi-
grants. Its inhabitants rejoiced in the growth of
their town and of their colony; they were pleased \p
find a market for the products of their gardens ; they
enjoyed the society of those through whom they could
receive tidings from the mother-country, and with whom
they could fraternize in religious worship. In many
cases they found among the new-comers old acquaint-
ances, the sight of whom awakened memories of the
past and the absent, in which, after so long an exile
from home, they experienced unspeakable pleasure.
But the immigrants who landed in Boston on the 26th
of June, 1637, received a warmer welcome than ordi-
nary. The eminence of " the famous Mr. Davenport,"
and the opulence of the merchants who accompanied
him, gave to this company, in the estimation of the
colonists, an unusual value. Not only Boston, but the
whole colony of Massachusetts, was desirous that they
should settle within that Commonwealth. " Great pains
were taken, not only by particular persons and towns,
but by the General Court, to fix them in the colony.
Charlestown made them large offers ; and Newbury
proposed to give up the whole town to them. The
58
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS. 59
General Court offered them any place which they should
choose!" '
The arrival of Davenport was considered especially
opportune because of the influence he might exert in
bringing to an end the controversy which then divided
the churches of Massachusetts in regard to Ann Hutch-
inson and the doctrines which she preached. " There
are certain opinions which always come forth, under
one form or another, in times of great religious excite-
ment, to dishonor the truth which they simulate, and
to defeat the work of God by heating the minds of
men to enthusiasm, and thus leading, them into licen-
tiousness of conduct. These opinions, essentially the
same under many modifications, have been known in
various ages by various names, as Antinomianism,
Familism, and — in our day — Perfectionism. Persons
falling into these errors commonly begin by talking
mystically and extravagantly about grace, the indwell-
ing of the Spirit, the identity of believers with the
person of Christ, or of the Holy Ghost, or of God. As
they proceed, they learn to despise all ordinances and
means of grace ; they put contempt upon the Bible as a
mere dead letter, worth nothing in comparison with
their inspiration ; they reject and revile all civil govern-
ment and order ; and not unfrequently they end in
denying theoretically all the difference between right
and wrong so far as their conduct is concerned, and in
rushing to the shameless perpetration of the most loath-
some wickedness. This intellectual and spiritual disease
had broken out in Massachusetts, and threatened to
become epidemic. An artful, enthusiastic, and eloquent
* Trumbull.
60 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
woman, forgetting the modesty of her sex, had set her-
self up for a preacher ; and by the adroitness with which
she addressed herself to the weaknesses and prejudices
of individuals and drew to her side the authority of some
of the most honored names in the colony, she seemed
likely, not only to lead her own blind followers to the
wildest extravagances, but to spread division through
all the churches. In this crisis, a man so eminent as
Davenport, so much respected by all parties, so exempt
from any participation in the controversy, so learned in
the Scriptures, so skilled in the great art of marking
distinctions and detecting fallacies, could not but be
welcomed by all." '
A synod of " all the teaching elders in the country "
was called to discuss the questions at issue, and dis-
criminate between truth and error. Of this assembly,
which began its sessions Aug. 30, and continued to sit
for three weeks, Davenport was one of the most influ-
ential members. "The wisdom and learning of this
worthy man,'* says Mather, " did contribute more than a
little to dispel the fascinating mists which had suddenly
disordered our affairs.'* A few days after the adjourn-
ment, Davenport, by request of the synod, preached a
sermon in which, " with much wisdom and sound argu-
ment, he persuaded to unity.** *
Meantime it had become evident that the people who
had come from the mother-country with Davenport, and
acknowledged him as a leader, were not content to
settle in the vicinity of Boston. Trumbull suggests
that the Antinomian controversy was one reason why
they wished to remove to a distance. But the same
* Bacon: Historical Discourses. ' Winthrop.
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS, 6 1
writer says, " It is probable that the motive which had
the greatest influence with the principal men was the
desire of being at the head of a new government, mod-
elled, both in civil and religious matters, agreeably to
their own apprehensions. In laying the foundations of
a new colony, there was a fair probability that they
might accommodate all matters of church and common-
wealth to their own feelings and sentiments. But in
Massachusetts the principal men were fixed in the chief
seats of government, which they were likely to keep,
and their civil and religious polity was already formed."
The day after the synod assembled, Theophilus Eaton
started with a considerable party on a tour of explora-
tion. The Pequot war had made the English acquainted
with the country west of the Connecticut River and
bordering on Long Island Sound. The Indians fled
westward after the destruction of their fort at Mystic,
and the English pursued them as far as Fairfield, where
on the 13th of July, seven weeks before Eaton started,
so many of the Pequots were slain, that the few sur-
vivors ceased to maintain a tribal organization, and
became incorporated with other tribes. In this pursuit,
the troops marching on the land, and their vessels
holding a parallel course on the water, the English came
to a harbor, which the Indians called by a name variously
written in that age, but known in modem orthography
as Quinnipiac, where they staid several days. They
were charmed with the country. Capt. Stoughton, in a
letter to Gov. Winthrop, speaks of it as preferable to
Pequot as a place for a settlement. He says, "The
providence of God guided us to so excellent a country
at Quellipioak river, and so all along the coast as we
62 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
traveled, as I am confident we have not the like as
yet."
In another letter "from Pequot, the 2nd day of the
6th week of our warfare," he says, " For this place is
scarce worthy much cost. But if you would enlarge the
state and provide for the poor servants of Christ that
are yet unprovided (which I esteem a worthy work), I
must speak my conscience. I confess, the place and
places whither God's providence carried us, that is, to
Quillepiage River, and so beyond to the Dutch, is before
this, or the Bay either (so far as I can j[udge), abun-
dantly."
This was probably written Aug. 14 ; and the gallant
captain reached Boston on the 26th of the same month,
when he had opportunity to give more copious descrip-
tion of what he had seen.
Capt. Underbill doubtless made report answerable to
what he has written in his " History of the Pequot
War," of that famous place called Queenapiok. " It
hath a fair river, fit for harboring of ships, and abounds
with rich and goodly meadows."
Moved by such tidings, Eaton went immediately to
view the place ; and so well did he like it, that, when
he set out on his return to Boston, he left seven of his
men to remain through the winter and make preparation
for the arrival of the rest of the company. It was Sep-
tember when he and his followers first saw Quinnipiac ;
and they doubtless spent some weeks in the neighbor-
hood, skirting the shore with their pinnace to examine
harbors and rivers. There can be no doubt that Eaton,
when he returned to Boston, was fully persuaded in his
own mind, that Quinnipiac was preferable to any
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS, 63
Other available place for the projected plantation.
Indeed, Winthrop speaks as if he thought the question
already settled when Eaton started on his tour of ex-
ploration. Under date of Aug. 31, he says, " Mr. Eaton
and some others of Mr. Davenport's company went to
view Quinnipiac with intent to begin a plantation
there. They had many offers here, and at Plymouth,
and they had viewed many places, but none would
content." But in a matter of so great importance it
was necessary to proceed slowly. The exploring party
must report to those who had remained in Massachu-
setts, and all the shareholders must have a voice in
selecting a place for their plantation. Perhaps it was
already too late in the year to build houses that would*
sufficiently shelter women and children from the rigor
of the approaching winter, even if the work were
commenced immediately. Certainly it was deemed
expedient to remain in Massachusetts till the opening
of spring; and this was the expectation when Eaton,
leaving seven men at Quinnipiac, returned to Boston
to make his report.
Joshua Atwater, Francis Brown, John Beecher,
Robert Pigg, and Thomas Hogg were of the seven.
The names of the others have not been preserved.
One of the seven died during the winter ; and his
bones were found in the year 1750, in digging the tellar
of the stone house at the corner of George and Meadow
Streets.' The hut which sheltered these adventurous
' I think that the man who died was John Beecher, as his name does
not occur on the earlier records, and there was a widow Beecher whose
son Isaac was old enough in 1644 to take the oath of fidelity. Dr. Dana
has preserved the tradition that Joshua Atwater was one of the seven who
remained at Quinnipiac during the winter: Lambert mentions the four
other names.
64 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
men was near the creek, and about fifty rods west of
the place where the survivors buried the body of their
comrade. A copious spring which once issued from
the bank between George Street and the creek, and was
covered when the creek was converted into a sewer,
may have determined the location of the hut. We may
imagine that they spent their time in hewing, cleaving,
and sawing, in hunting and trapping, and in collecting,
by means of barter with the natives, beaver and other
furs for the European market. If, like their brethren
at Saybrook, they had dogs, they might, by enclosing
their house with palisades, lie down to sleep with as
little danger of being surprised by an enemy, as if they
had been in Boston. Whatever communication they
had with their friends during the winter, must l\^ve
been by means of special messengers. Indian runners
were easily found to perform such a service.' We shall
presently see, that before the 12th of March, letters had
been sent by their friends in Massachusetts, directing
them to transact with the natives for the purchase of
land. Doubtless the same letters instructed them to
build huts, and make all possible provision for the
comfort of those who were to arrive.
With the exception of these seven, the people who
crossed the Atlantic in the Hector and her consort
remained in Boston or in the vicinity during the winter,
many of them having found employment suitable to
their several vocations. Though somewhat scattered,
some finding lodgings and employment in one place
and some in another, they were still an organized com-
' Trumbull quotes Roger Williams as saying, " I have known them run
between eighty and a hundred miles in a summer*s day.'*
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS, 65
pany, and as such were required by the government of
Massachusetts to pay taxes as if they had already
settled as a town in that Commonwealth. A tax was
levied by the General Court, in November after their
arrival, to pay the expenses of the Pequot war. The
sum required was a thousand pounds, of which nine
hundred and eighty pounds was assessed upon the sev-
eral towns ; the name of Mr, Eaton being added to the
list of towns, with the minute, " Mr. Eaton is left out
of this rate, leaving it to his discretion what he will
freely give toward these charges." .The difference
between the amount required, and the amount of the
assessments, indicates what sum it was desired that Mr.
Eaton should "freely give ; " and the discretion allowed
him was probably due to the fact that these expenses
had been for the most part incurred before he and his
party arrived in the country ; the destruction of the fort
at Mystic, which was the great event of the war, having
taken place on the 26th of May, a full month before
the Hector cast anchor in the harbor of Boston. But
when another rate was levied, on the twelfth day of
March of the following year, amounting to fifteen hun-
dred pounds, Mr. Eaton's name was again appended to
the list of towns with an assessment of twenty pounds,
and without intimation that payment was optional.
It is a noteworthy coincidence that this second tax is
of the same date with the following letter : —
"It may please the worthy and much honored Governor, Dep-
uty, and Assistants, and with them the present Court, to take
knowledge, that our desire of staying within this patent was real
and strong, if the eye of God^s providence (to whom we have com-
mitted our ways, especially in so important an enterprise as this,
66 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
which, we confess, is far above our capacities) had guided us to a
place convenient for our families and friends. Which, as our
words have often expressed, so, we hope, the truth thereof is
sufficiently declared by our almost nine months' patient waiting
in expectation of some opportunity to be offered us, for that end,
to our great charge and hindrance many ways. In all which
time we have, in many prayers, commended the guidance of our
apprehensions, judgments, spirits, resolutions, and ways into the
good hand of the only wise God, whose prerogative it is to deter-
mine the bounds of our habitations, according to the ends for which
he hath brought us into these countries ; and we have considered,
as we were able, by his help, whatsoever place hath been pro-
pounded to us, b^ng ready to have with contentment accepted
(if by our stay any public good might be promoted) smaller accom-
modations and upon dearer terms (if they might be moderately
commodious) than, we believe, most men, in the same case with us
, in all respects, would have done. And whereas a place for an inland
plantation, beyond Watertown, was propounded to us, and pressed
with much importunity by some, whose words have the power of a
law with us, in any way of God, we did speedily and seriously delib-
erate thereupon, it being the subject of the greatest part of a day's
discourse. The conclusion was that, if the upland should answer
the meadow ground in goodness and desirableness, (whereof yet
there is some cause of doubting,) yet, considering that a boat can-
not pass from the bay thither, nearer than eight or ten miles dis-
tance, and that it is so remote from the bay, and from any town,
we could not see how our dwelling there would be advantageous to
these plantations or compatible with our conditions or commodious
for our families or for our friends. Nor can we satisfy ourselves
that it is expedient for ourselves, or for our friends, that we choose
such a condition, wherein we must be compelled to have our dwell-
ing houses so far distant from our farms as Boston or Charlestown
is from that place, few of our friends being able to bear the charge
thereof, (whose cases, nevertheless, we are bound to consider,) and
some of them, that are able, not being persuaded that it is lawful for
them to live continually from the greatest part of their families, as
in this case they would be necessitated to do. The season of the
year, and other weighty considerations, compelled us to hasten to
THE WINTER SPENT IN MASSACHUSETTS, 6/
a full and final conclusion, which we are at last come unto, by
God's appointment and direction, we hope, in mercy, and have sent
letters to Connecticut for a speedy transacting the purchase of
the parts about Quillypiac from the natives which may pretend
title thereunto. By which act we absolutely and irrevocably en-
gaged that way ; and we are persuaded that God will order it for
good unto these plantations, whose love so abundantly above our
deserts or expectations, expressed in your desire of our abode in
these parts, as we shall ever retain in thankful memory, so we shall
account ourselves thereby obliged to be any way instrumental and
serviceable for the common good of these plantations as well as
of those ; which the divine providence hath combined together in
as strong a bond of brotherly affection, by the sameness of their
condition, as Joab and Abishai were, whose several armies did
mutually strengthen them both against their several enemies, ii.
Sam. X. 9, 10, 1 1 ; or rather they are joined together, as Hippocrates
his twins, to stand and fall, to grow and decay, to flourish and
wither, to live and die, together. In witness of the premises we
subscribe our names,
^nJ^a/b2/n^(> 7/lt
C^[:i(lm^\ CoMnu
(I
The I2th day of the ist month, 1638."
This letter, which is still preserved, is in the hand-
writing of Davenport, but is superscribed as follows in
the handwriting of Eaton : " To the much honored, the
Governor, Deputy, and Assistants." From this commu-
nication it appears that even if Eaton had returned from
his tour of exploration fully expecting that be and his
• •
68 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
company would settle at Quinnipiac, he had not so fully
expressed his determination as to preclude further
effort to persuade him to remain in Massachusetts. It
further appears that before the date of this communi-
cation the company had formally decided to fix their
plantation at Quinnipiac, and had sent notice thereof
to those who were already on the ground. Eighteen
days afterward, that is, on the 30th of March, the leaders
of the company and most of their followers embarked
at Boston. After a tedious voyage of "about a fort-
night they arrived at their desired port." * Winthrop
thus narrates their departure : " Mr. Davenport and
Mr. Prudden and a brother of Mr. Eaton, (being minis-
ters also,) went by water to Quinnipiac ; and with
them many families removed out of this jurisdiction to
plaat in those parts, being much taken with the opinion
of the fruitfulness of that place and more safety (as
they conceived) filom danger of a general governor,
who was feared to be sent this summer ; which though
it were a great weakening to these parts, yet we ex-
pected to see a good providence of God in it, (for all
possible means had been used to accommodate them
here ; Charlestown offered them largely, Newbury their
whole town, the court any place which was free,) both
for possessing those parts which lay open for an enemy,
and for strengthening our friends at Connecticut, and
for making room here for many, who were expected out
of England this year, and for diverting the thoughts and
intentions of such in England as intended evil against
us, whose designs might be frustrate by our scattering
so far ; and such as were now gone that way were a?
much in the eye of the state of England as we here."
« Trumbull.
CHAPTER V.
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC.
THE company which came from London in the
Hector and her consort, numbered about fifty
adult men ; or, including women, children, and servants,
about two hundred and fifty persons. But so great was
the enthusiasm excited by tHe report which the soldiers
brought of Quinnipiac, and so strong the confidence
felt in the leaders of the expedition, that when the
company left Boston in the spring of 1638 its num-
ber was considerably increased by accessions from
Massachusetts. Skirting the coast, and perhaps calling
at Saybrook fort where Lion Gardiner, an old acquaint-
ance of Davenport, commanded,' they at last reached
the harbor of Quinnipiac. West of the river of that
name, they saw two smaller streams pouring into the
harbor, each sufficient to float such a vessel as theirs.
The mouth of the East Creek was where the railway
now crosses East Water Street, and vessels entering it
could be floated up, over what is now the bed of the rail-
* Gardiner, in his relation of the Pequot wars, says that it was
** through the persuasion of Mr. John Davenport and Mr. Hugh Peters,
with some other well-affected Englishmen of Rotterdam," that he left the
service of the Prince of Orange in Holland to serve the patentees of Con-
necticut— Mms. Hist CdL XXIILt p. 136.
«9
yo HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
way, as far as Chapel Street.' The West Creek emptied
its waters where the sewer now crosses West Water
Street. Still farther westward, beyond Oyster Point,
the West River also emptied its waters into the harbor.
Up the West Creek sailed Davenport and his compan-
ions, gazing with interest on the wilderness which
was to be their home. They saw a plain extending
inland about two miles, at which distance stood basaltic
rocks colored with iron, and so prominent in the land-
scape that the Dutch had called the place Rodenbergh
or Red Mount. It was well supplied with timber, but
there were spaces where the natives had raised suc-
cessive harvests of maize. A dense forest covered a
small tract where the "spruce masts" grew; but the
larger portion was an open forest, promising to supply
sufficient timber for building houses and fences, with
perhaps a little surplus for exportation in the form of
clapboards and shingles. The tree under which they
held their service of worship on the first sabbath after
their arrival was a spreading oak which had not lacked
room for development. Before the expiration of the
second year it was ordered by the General Court that
"no man shall cut any timber down, but where he
shall be assigned by the magistrate, except on his own
ground." Such an enactment implies that there was
no superabundance of timber in the vicinity of the
settlement.
On the west side of this plain were broad salt meadows,
bordering the West River on either bank, and extending
inland almost to the Red Hill which the planters called
the West Rock. On the east side of the plain were
' N. H. Col. Rec I. 143.
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. J I
still more extensive salt meadows spread out on both
sides of the Quinnipiac, or East River, and also on both
sides of a stream flowing into it a short distance above
its outlet, which the settlers named Mill River as soon
as they were able to erect a mill. The meadows on the
Quinnipiac extended northward much farther than those
on W^st River. These salt meadows on both sides of
the plain, yielding abundant provender without delay
and without labor, had greatly influenced the company
in choosing this place for their plantation. Invisible
from the deck of the pinnace, they were doubtless
eagerly inquired for by those who had not been of the
exploring party. But, though rendered invisible by
the intervention of higher ground, they so much widened
the view, that on one side the eye could reach the. hills
beyond the West River, and, on the other, the highlands
beyond the Quinnipiac.
The temporary shelters, which the first planters of
New England provided for their families till they could
erect permanent dwellings, were of different kinds.
Some planters carried tents with them to the place
chosen for a new home ; some built wigwams like those
of the natives. Either species would suffice in summer ;
but for winter they usually built huts, as they called
them, similar to the modern log-cabins in the forests of
the West, though in some instances if not in most, they
were roofed, after the English fashion, with thatch. It
was perhaps a peculiarity of New Haven, that cellars
were used for temporary habitations. They were, as
the name suggests, partially under ground, and perhaps
in most cases on a hill-side. If built on the bank be-
tween the West Creek and George Street, with aper-
72 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
tures opening to the south, they would be open to
the sun and sheltered from the northern winds. Rev.
Michael Wigglesworth,' who came to Quinnipiac with
his parents in October, 1638, when he was about seven
years old, describes the cellar in which the family spent
the first winter, as covered with earth on the roof.
Such a covering might be effectual to exclude th% cold
winds of winter, but, as the boy's experience proves, it
was a poor protection from a heavy rain. When he was
an old man he remembered how he had been, while
asleep, drenched with water permeating the muddy roof,
and had been afflicted in consequence with a dangerous
illness. Doubtless the party which had wintered at the
place had made ready not only a public storehouse, but
sevei:al huts or cellars in which their friends who were
to arrive might temporarily shelter their families. These
would be visible to the new-comers as they approached
the shore and ascended the creek.
The pinnace in which they had made the voyage was
perhaps the property of some of the company, for such a
vessel would be constantly in requisition for various ser-
vices to the inhabitants of a new plantation. But, even
if owned in Boston, she would remain for some days till
accommodations on shore could be provided for all.
It was Friday when they left Boston ; and, as they
are said to have spent about a fortnight on the voyage,
it was the latter part of the week when they arrived.
On the sabbath they worshipped under an oak-tree near
the landing ; and Mr. Davenport, in a sermon on Matt,
iv. I, "insisted on the temptations of the wilderness,
made such observations, and gave such directions and
' See his autobiographical paper in Appendix I.
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC, J I
exhortations, as were perthient to the then present con-
dition of his hearej's." He left this remark, that he
"enjoyed a good day." * Lambert says that Mr. Prud-
den preached in the afternoon, but does not give his
authority. It was perhaps a Milford tradition, and it
has inherent probability.
In the valedictory letter of Davenport and Eaton to
the General Court of Massachusetts they say, "We
have sent letters to Connecticut for a speedy transact-
ing the purchase of the parts about Quinnipiac from the
natives.*' The purchase had probably been effected
before their arrival in April, though no written deed
was signed till the following November. The natives,
therefore, were expecting the large re-enforcement re-
ceived by the six Englishmen with whom they were
now well acquainted. They welcomed the new-comers,
and were pleased to have in their neighborhood a planta-
tion of Englishmen, to which they might retreat when
molested by their enemies, and where they might bar-
ter their venison, pelts, and furs, for the much-admired
tools and trinkets of the English. They now for the
first time saw English women and children ; and their
curiosity, which, in respect to the little company left by
Eaton in the preceding autumn, had waned, again drew
them to the border of the West Creek. The medal
' Trumbull, i. 96. It is apparent that Trumbull had ' access to some
diary or other written statement of Davenport. The oak-tree was about
twenty feet north of George Street, and about forty-five feet east of Col-
lege Street It is said that a section of the tree afterward supported the
anril on which two stalwart generations of Beechers hammered, before
Lyman Beecher transferred the role of the family from the anvil to the
pulpit. Their shop was in College Street, near the place where the tree
had stood.
74 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Struck two centuries afterward, in commemoration of
the settlement of the town, very properly represents
some of them sitting near the company assembled
on Sunday under the oak-tree. Here they witnessed
the wotship which the English rendered to the Great
Spirit. Here they began to be acquainted with the
preacher whom afterward they characterized as " so-big-
study man,"
The English soon after their arrival at Quinnipiac
observed a day of extraordinary humiliation, when they
formed a social compact, mutually promising "that as
in matters that concern the gathering and ordering of
a church, so likewise in all public offices, which concern
civil order, as choice of magistrates and officers, making
and repealing of laws, dividing allotments of inheritance,
and all things of like nature," they would all of them be
ordered by those rules which the Scripture holds forth.
For more than a year they had ho other civil or eccle-
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. 7$
siastical organization. There were doubtless frequent
meetings for the transaction of business, and, if we may
judge of that year by the years that followed, there were
penalties inflicted on evil-doers. But, if any individuals
were authorized to act as magistrates, the record of their
appointment has not been preserved. The plantation
covenant, like the compact signed in the cabin of the
Mayflower, was a provisional arrangement of men, who,
finding themselves beyond the actual jurisdiction of any
earthly government, attempted to govern themselves
according to the law of God.
The first care of the planters was to choose a site
for their future town ; the next to lay out streets and
house-lots, so that each family might as soon as possible
make preparations for gardening and building. Tradi-
tion reports that they would have chosen Oyster Point
but for the difficulty of digging wells, water being ob-
tained in that neighborhood only at great depth. They
decided, however, to locate the principal part of their
town on the north side of the West Creek, rather than
on the s6Hth side, and to make a line parallel with that
stream and near its border, the base-line of the town-
plot.
Accordingly George Street was laid out half a mile in
length and upon it as a base, a square was described.
The half-mile square not being sufficient, two suburbs
were added. One consisted of a four-sided piece whose
shape and dimensions were determined by the two
creeks as the water ran when nearing the harbor. It
was bounded by George, Water, Meadow, and State
Streets. The other was on the west side of the West
Creek. Changes since made in the highways render
76 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
difficult the task of defining it ; but Hill Street was its
eastern, or more properly north-eastern, boundary.
The square described on George Street was divided
by two parallel streets running east and west, and by
two parallel streets running north and south, into nine
equal squares ; of which the square in the centre was
sequestered as a market-place. The remaining eight
squares and the suburbs were divided into house-lots,
and assigned to the planters severally, who seem to
have grouped themselves, to some extent, according to
personal acquaintance and friendship in the old country.
The Herefordshire men, for example, had their lots on
the south-west and south-centre squares, or quarters, as
they were then called. The eight squares were for a
long time distinguished one from another by the names
of some prominent persons who lived on the quarters
to which their names were respectively applied. The
north-east square was called Mr. Eaton's quarter, or in
later years the Governor's quarter. The north-centre
was Mr. Robert Newman's quarter. The north-west
was Mr. Tench's quarter. The west-centre was Mr.
Evance's quarter, or, for a reason which will be ex-
plained hereafter, the Yorkshire quarter. The south-
west was Mr. Fowler's, or the Herefordshire quarter.
Mr. Gregson's name was applied to the south-centre,
Mr. Lamberton's to the south-east, and Mr. Daven-
port's to the east-centre. The suburbs were sufficiently
indicated by that appellation without attaching the name
of an inhabitant. In the division of out-lands the two
suburbs were united together as one society or quarter.
Four lots situated on East Water Street were included
with Mr. Davenport's quarter, as one of the nine quar-
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC, 7/
ters or societies into which the town was divided for
the allotment of out-lands.
John Brockett seems to have been the chief sur-
•veyor ; and he doubtless is responsible for the accuracy
of angles, and the equality of the nine equal sections
into which he was required to cut the larger square first
laid out. The dimensions of the town plot may have
been determined by the course of the creeks ; for George
Street, if it had been continued a few rods farther west,
would have crossed the West Creek, which in its course
made an angle of about ninety degrees near that point.
The town-plot having been laid out, the sections into
which it was cut by its streets were assigned to groups
of families drawn together by social affinity, and were
severally divided among those families in house-lots dif-
fering in dimensions according to a ratio depending
partly on the number of persons in the family, and
partly on the amount the family had invested in the
common stock of the proprietors. Among the minor
benefits secured by this elective grouping, was delay in
building division fences. Each quarter, being immedi-
ately Enclosed by a fence separating it from the high-
way, was ready for tillage. These fences were sometimes
of pickets ahd sometimes of rails. In June, 1640, prices
for both kinds were established by law. Fencing
with pales must be "not above two shillings a rod
for felling and cleaving posts and rails, cross-cutting,
hewing, mortising, digging holes, setting up and nailing
on the pales, the work being in all the parts well wrought
and finished ; but, in this price, pales and carting of the
stuff not included." "Fencing with five rails, substan-
tial posts, good rails, well wrought, set up, and rammed,
78 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
that pigs, swine, goats, and other cattle may be kept
out, not above two shillings a rod." A year later these
rates were reduced twenty-five per cent, the reduction
being probably due to the ebbing of that tide of emigra-
tion which, till the civil war in the mother-country com-
menced, had constantly supplied New England with
money, and a market for labor as well as for cattle and
other products of husbandry.
There was time for building all these fences before
the season had sufficiently advanced to justify the col-
onists in planting gardens or driving cattle across the
country from Massachusetts. The cold, which had been
unusually severe during the winter, was protracted into
the months of spring. Winthrop records on the twenty-
third day of April, " This was a very hard winter. The
snow lay, from November 4th to March 23d, half a yard
deep about the Massachusetts, and a yard deep beyond
the Merrimack, and so the more north, the deeper ; and
the spring was very backward. This day it did snow
two hours together (after much rain from the north-east)
with flakes as great as shillings." Again he writes on
the 2d of May, " The spring was so cold, that men were
forced to plant their com two or three times, for it
rotted in the ground." But notwithstanding this un-
propitious beginning, which threatened a dearth through
all New England, warm weather afterward brought on
corn beyond expectation ; and Quinnipiac seems to have
shared in the blessing of a good harvest, so that there
was no such scarcity of bread as there had been at Hart-
ford the preceding winter, when the price of Indian com
rose to twelve shillings per bushel, which was five or six
times its usual value.
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. 79
While some were planting and fencing, others were
preparing lumber for the erection of permanent dwell-
ings. Having no mill for sawing, they were obliged to
slit the logs by hand ; and the tariff of prices prescribes
how much more the "top-man, or he that guides the
work and perhaps finds the tools,'* shair receive than
"the pit-man, whose skill and charge is less." The log
was first hewn square, and then placed on a frame over
a pit, so that a man could stand beneath and assist in
moving the saw. This department of industry de-
manded their earliest attention ; so that the boards,
being exposed to the winds of spring and the heat of
summer, might be ready for the carpenter as soon as
possible. • The price of inch boards must not exceed
five shillings and ninepence per hundred feet if sold
in the woods, or seven shillings and ninepence if
sold in the town. But, as this tariff was established
in 1640, prices may have been somewhat less in
1638, when the town-plot furnished all the lumber
required for immediate use. Indeed, the price of
lumber had fallen considerably in 1641, when inch
boards must not be sold above four shillings and
eightpence per hundred in the woods, or above six
shillings in the town.
Before winter most of the colonists who had arrived
in April were living on their house-lots, leaving their
cellars or other temporary shelters for new-comers.
Some of the houses, being occupied by persons of small
estates, were presumably such as a Dutch traveller saw
at Plymouth, and describes as block-houses built of hewn
logs. Such a presumption explains an item in a bill of
sale by which one of the first plai;^ters alienated his
80 HISTORY QF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
house and house-lot and ''two loads of clay brought
home." The clay was doubtless to be "daubed" be-
tween the logs. From the mention of thatchers, and
the precautions taken against fire, it may be inferred
that these humbler tenements were roofed with thatch.
Many of the houses, however, were of framed timber,
and were covered with shingles or clapboards on the
sides, and with shingles on the roof. Quinnipiac had a
larger proportion of wealthy men than any other of the
New England colonies. Some of them, having been
accustomed to live in large and elegant houses in
London, expended liberally in providing new homes.
It was but natural that they should wish to maintain a
style not much inferior to the style in which they had
formerly lived ; and as they confidently thought they
were founding a commercial town in a country so rich
in resources that on a single cargo exported to England
they could afford to pay duties to the amount of three
thousand pounds, they justified themselves in a liberal
expenditure in building their houses. If they had fore-
seen the political changes in England which after a few
years turned the flow of emigration backward toward
the mother-country, — even if they had known that their
plantation must depend on husbandry more than on com-
merce,— they might have been content with less ex-
pensive dwellings. As it was, they drew upon them-
selves the criticism of brethren in the other colonies.
Hubbard the historian, who in 1638 was seventeen years
old, speaks of their "error in great buildings," and after-
ward says, " They laid out too much of their stocks and
estates in building of fair and stately houses, wherein
they at the first outdid the rest of the country." Tradi-
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. 8 1
tion reports that the house of Theophilus Eaton was so
large as to have nineteen fireplaces, and that it was
lofty as well as large. Davenport's house, on the op-
posite side of the street, is said to have had thirteen
fireplaces.'
It is not necessary to believe that any of the " fair
and stately" houses in Quinnipiac were finished in
1638. If the frame were set up and covered, and a few
rooms were made ready to be occupied by the family,
the remainder of the work might be postponed till the
next summer.
In October the planters welcomed an accession to
their number which they regarded as an earnest of still
greater enlargement. Ezekiel Rogers, a minister of
high standing in Yorkshire, having embarked act Hull
on the H umber, with a company who personally knew
him and desired to enjoy his ministry, arrived in Bos-
ton late in the summer. Such representations were
made to him by Davenport and Eaton or their agents,
that he engaged to come with his followers to Quinni-
piac ; and within eight weeks after his arrival in Massa-
chusetts a portion of his people came by water to the
new settlement, encountering on the voyage a storm
which drove them upon a beach of sand where they lay
rocking till another tide floated them off. Rogers, ex-
pecting to be joined in a year or two by some persons of
rank and wealth who had been providentially thwarted
in their desire to embark with him, had inserted in his
engagement to take stock in the Quinnipiac company,
* Stiles' History of the Judges. President Stiles had been, when a
boy, personally familiar with the interior of the Davenport house.
82 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
certain stipulations referring to these friends for whom
he was authorized to act. The nature of the stipu-
lations cannot now be known ; but, whatever they
were, Rogers, who did not come to Quinnipiac with
the first instalment of his company, became convinced
that they would not be fulfilled to his satisfaction,
and laid the matter as a case of conscience before the
Massachusetts elders, who advised him that he was re-
leased from his engagement. He thereupon decided
to remain in Massachusetts, and sent a pinnace to
bring back those of his company who had left him in
October.
Davenport and Eaton, being less willing than the
Massachusetts elders to release Rogers from his en-
gagement, detained the pinnace, and by a special mes-
senger despatched letters of remonstrance which seem
to have staggered him, till the elders again assembling
and examining all the correspondence between the par-
ties, confirmed their former judgment. He accordingly
began a plantation in Massachusetts, which received
the name of Rowley, from the place where he had
exefcised his ministry in the mother-country. But
some of his Yorkshire friends, who had gone to Quin-
nipiac expecting that he would follow, did not return
in the pinnace he sent for them. It was now winter,
and perhaps the inclemency of the season disinclined
them to leave the cellars in which they were sheltered.
Perhaps the storm they encountered in coming, in-
spired them with dread of the sea. Perhaps they were
pleased with the new plantation, admiring its leaders,
enjoying intercourse with its people, and participating
with them in sanguine expectation of its future. For
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC, 83
some reason several of the Yorkshire families re-
mained, and became permanently incorporated in the
new community.
Rogers in the course of the next two years mentions
several times, in letters to Gov. Winthrop, the losses
sustained by the people of Rowley in cqnsequence of
coming back to Massachusetts. He says, "None do
know (or few) what we are impoverished by this pur-
chase, and Quinnipiac, and the failing of some expected
friends." Again, "I suppose you hear of a new sad
cross from Quinnipiac in Jo. Hardy's pinnace, wherein
may be much of my estate for aught I know." And
still later : " It hath been a trouble of late to my poor
neighbors to hear of this " (that a part of Rowley was
claimed by others) ** after their purchase, and building,
and return from Quinnipiac." These hints were pre-
paratory to a claim v^hich he formally made in the
autumn of 1640, that this land claimed by another party
as previously granted, should be confirmed to Rowley.
Appearing before the court over which Winthrop was
presiding, he "pleaded justice, upon some promises of
large accommodations, &c., when we desired his sitting
down with us." The scene that ensued when the re-
quest was refused on the ground that the land had
already been granted, is in several respects instructive.
The elder lost his temper, and by that means gained his
cause ; for the court, after disciplining him for contempt,
"freely granted what he formerly desired." '•
■ In one of the letters from Rogers to Winthrop cited above, he speaks
of one of the New Haven planters as follows : " Sir : Mr. Lamberton did
OS much wrong. I expected his coming to the Bay : but it seems he sits
down at Quinnipiac : yet he hath a house in Boston : I would humbly crave
84 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The next event after the arrival of the Yorkshire
company, which deserves notice, is the formal purchase
of land from the Indians. The terms had been agreed
upon in the winter, but no written title had been given,
formalities being postponed perhaps till a more com-
petent interpreter than any of the planters could be
obtained. Thomas Stanton, of high repute for knowl-
edge of the Indian tongue, having been employed to
come from Hartford and explain the written deed to
the Indian sachem and his council, it was signed by
them on the 24th of November.' Its full text is as fol-
lows, with the exception of two hiatuses where the
record-book has been torn : —
" Articles of agreement between Theophilus Eaton and John Dav-
enport and others, English planters at Quinnipiac on the one
party, and Momaugin the Indian Sachem of Quinnipiac and
Sugcogisin, Quesaquaush, Carroughood, Wesaucuck and others
of his council on the other party, made and concluded the 24th
of November 1638; Thomas Stanton being interpreter.
" That he the said sachem, his council, and company do jointiy
profess, affirm and covenant that he the said Momaugin is the sole
sachem of Quinnipiac, and hath an absolute and independent power
to give, alien, dispose or sell, all or any part of the lands in Quin-
nipiac and that though he have a son now absent, yet neither his
said son, nor any other person whatsoever hath any right, tide or
your advice to Mr. Will Bellingham about it, whether we might not enter
an action against him and upon proof get help by that house." This evi-
dently refers to Rogers* disappointment in not receiving back those of his
flock who staid in New Haven, and reads as if Lamberton were to be
counted among them.
* In " New Haven's Case Stated ** it is claimed that Stanton, at the
request of the New Haven people, was sent by their friends in Connecti-
cut to assist in this purchase, and that Connecticut had thus consented
to the transaction.
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. 85
interest in any part of the said lands, so that whatsoever he, the
forenamed sachem, his council and the rest of the Indians present
do and conclude, shall stand firm and inviolable against all claims
and persons whatsoever.
^ Secondly, the said sachem, his council, and company, amongst
which there was a squaw sachem called Shaumpishuh, sister to the
sachem, who either had or pretended some interest in some part
of the land, remembering and acknowledging the heavy taxes and
eminent dangers which they lately felt and feared from the Pequots,
Mohawks, and other Indians, in regard of which they durst not stay
in their country, but were forced to fly and to seek shelter under
the English at Connecticut, and observing the safety and ease that
other Indians enjoy near the English, of which benefit they have
had a comfortable taste already, since the English began to build
and plant at Quinnipiac, which with all thankfulness they now ac-
knowledged, they jointly and freely gave and yielded up all their
right, title and interest to all the land, rivers, ponds, and trees with
all the liberties and appurtenances belonging unto the same in
Quinnipiac to the utmost of their bounds east, west, north, south,
unto Theophilus Eaton, John Davenport and others, the present
English planters there and to their heirs and assigns forever, desir-
ing from them the said English planters to receive such a portion
of ground on the East side of the harbor, towards the fort at the
mouth of the river of Connecticut as might be sufficient for them,
being but few in number, to plant in ; and yet within these limits to
be hereafter assigned to them, they did covenant and freely yield
up unto the said English all the meadow ground lying therein, with
full liberty to choose and cut down what timber they please, for any
use whatsoever, without any question, license, or consent to be asked
from them the said Indians, and if, after their portion and place be
limited and set out by the English as above, they the said Indians
shall desire to remove to any other place within Quinnipiac bounds,
but without the limits assigned them, that they do it not without
leave, neither setting up any wigwam, nor breaking up any ground
to plant com, till first it be set out and appointed by the forenamed
English planters for them.
** Thirdly, the said sachem, his council, and company, desiring
liberty to hunt and fish within the bounds of Quinnipiac now given
86 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
and granted to the English as before, do hereby jointly covenant
and bind themselves to set no traps near any place where the . . .
. . . whether horses, oxen, kine, calves, sheep, goats, hogs or any
sort
... to take any fish out of any wier belonging to any English,
nor to do any thing near any such wier as to disturb or affright
away any fish to the prejudice of such wier or wiers, and that upon
discovery of any inconveniency growing to the English by the
Indians disorderly hunting, their hunting shall be regulated and
limited for the preventing of any inconvenience and yet with as
little damage to the Indians in their hunting as may be.
" Fourthly, the said sachem, his council, and company do hereby
covenant and bind themselves that none of them shall henceforth
hanker about any of the English houses at any time when the
English use to meet about the public worship of God ; nor on the
Lord's day henceforward be seen within the compass of the Eng-
lish town, bearing any burdens, or offering to truck with the English
for any commodity whatsoever, and that none of them hencefor-
ward without leave, open any latch belonging to any Englishman's
door, nor stay in any English house after warning that he should
leave the same, nor do any violence, wrong, or injury to the person
of the English, whether man, woman or child, upon any pretence
whatsoever, and if the English of this plantation, by themselves or
cattle, do any wrong or damage to the Indians, upon complaint,
just recompense shall be made by the English ; and that none of
them henceforward use or take any Englishman's boat or canoe of
what kind soever, from the place where it was fastened or laid,
without leave from the owner first had and obtained, nor that they
come into the English town with bows and arrows or any other
weapons whatsoever in number above six Indians so armed at a
time.
" Fifthly, the said sachem, his council, and company do truly
covenant and bind themselves that if any of them shall hereafter kill
or hurt any English cattle of what sort soever, though casually or
negligently, they shall give full satisfaction for the loss or damage
as the English shall judge equal : but if any of them for any respect,
wilfully do kill or hurt any of the English cattle ; upon proof, they
shall pay the double value : and if, at any time, any of them find
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC, 8/
any of the English cattle straying or lost in the woods, they shall
bring them back to the English plantation and a moderate price or
recompense shall be allowed for their pains ; provided if it can be
proved that any of them drove away any of the English cattle
wheresoever they find them, further from the English plantation to
make an increase or advantage or recompense for his pains finding
or bringing them back, they shall in any such case pay damages for
such dealings.
*' Sixthly, the number of the Quinnipiac Indians, men or youth
grown to stature fit for service, being forty-seven at present, they
do covenant and bind themselves not to receive or admit any other
Indians amongst them without leave first had and obtained from
the English, and that they will not, at any time hereafter, entertain
or harbor any that are enemies to the English, but will presently
apprehend such and deliver them to the English, and if they know
or hear of any plot by the Indians or others against the English,
they will forthwith discover and make the same known to them,
and in case they do not, to be accounted as parties in the plot and
to be proceeded against as such.
" Lastly, the said sachem, his council, and company do hereby
promise truly and carefully to observe and keep all and every one
of these articles of agreement ; and if any of them o£Fend in any
of the promises, they jointly hereby subject and submit such
ofiEender or offenders to the consideration, censure, and punish-
ment of the English magistrate or officers appointed among them
for government, without expecting that the English should first
advise with them about it : yet in any such case of punishment, if
the said sachem shall desire to know the reason and equity of said
proceedings, he shall truly be informed of the same.
" The former articles being read and interpreted to them, they
by way of exposition desired that in the sixth article it might be
added, that if any of the English cattle be killed or hurt casually,
or negligently, and proof made it was done by some of the Quinni-
piac Indians, they will make satisfaction, or if done by any other
Indians in their sight, if they do not discover it and, if able, bring
the offender to the English, they will be accounted and dealt with
as guilty.
<« In consideration of all which, they desire from the English, that,
88 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
if at any time hereafter they be a£Erighted in their dwellings assigned
by the English unto them as before, they may repair to the English
plantation for shelter and that the English will then in a just cause
endeavor to defend them from wrong. But in any quarrel or wars
which they shall undertake or have with other Indians, upon any
occasion whatsoever, they will manage their afEairs by themselves
without expecting any aid from the English.
** And the English planters before mentioned accepting and grant-
ing according to the tenor of the premises do further of their own
accord, by way of free and thankful retribution, give unto the said
sachem, council, and company of the Quinnipiac Indians, twelve
coats of English trucking cloth, twelve alchemy spoons, twelve
hatchets, twelve hoes, two dozen of knives, twelve porringers, and
four cases of French knives and scissors. All which being thank-
fully accepted by the aforesaid and the agreements in all points
perfected, for ratification and full confirmation of the same, the
sachem, his council, and sister, to these presents have set to their
hands or marks the day and year above written.
MOMAUGlN J^^ ^^^ his mark
SuGCOGisiN l( ^' liis mark
QUESAQUAUSH ' ^'^ ™^^
^ ^_ -^^ his mark
Carroughood
Weesaucuck # his mark
Shaumiishuh -^^ ^ her
mark"
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC, 80
** I, Thomas Stanton, being interpreter in this treaty, do hereby
profess in the presence of God that I have fully acquainted the
Indians with the substance of every article and truly returned their
answer and consent to the same, according to the tenor of the fore-
going writing, the truth of which, if lawfully called, I shall readily
confirm by my oath at any time.
Thomas Stanton."
On the nth of December, Montowese, sachem of
another tribe, "in presence and with allowance and
consent of Sauseunck, an Indian who came in company
with him,** sold to the English a tract of land lying
north of that sold by Momaugin, and described as " ex-
tending about ten miles in length from north to south,
eight miles easterly from the river of Quinnipiac to-
ward the river of Connecticut and five miles westerly
toward Hudson's river.** Montowese, reserving a
piece of land near the village which now bears his
name, " for his men which are ten, and many squaws, to
plant in,** received " eleven coats of trucking cloth, and
one coat of English cloth made up after the English
manner,** in payment for the territory thus alienated.
The attesting marks of Montowese and Sawseunck
are as follows : —
** Montowese ^'"^^T'^ his mark
Sawseunck I his mark"
go HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
At the present day we are apt to think that these
sachems sold their land for a ridiculously small price ;
but one who attentively considers all the circumstances
of the case, the reservations they made, the protection
they secured, and the opportunity for trade afforded
by the English settlement, will perhaps conclude that
what they received was of greater value to them than
what they sold. It does not appear that the Indians
were afterward dissatisfied with the terms of sale.
Contemporaneously with the excitement among the
Yorkshire peopFe about returning to Massachusetts,
there was conference among those who had come with
Prudden from Hereford, tending toward a removal from
Quinnipiac to a separate plantation, in which they
might enjoy his ministry. What the understanding had
been between his Herefordshire flock and the London
men in reference to a church and church-officers at
Quinnipiac, it is impossible to determine with cer-
tainty ; but, as the latter party had brought with them
two ministers in whom they were interested, we may
conjecture that if they encouraged the Hereford men to
believe that Prudden should be their minister, they did
so in expectation that he would be united with Daven-
port and Samuel Eaton in the eldership of the church.
Trumbull relates that Prudden preached at Wethers-
field during the summer of 1638 ; and, as a part of the
first planters of MUford came from Wethersfield on
account of their regard for him and some disagree-
ment in their church, it is probable that the project of
a settlement at Milford grew out of Prudden's visit to
Wethersfield. Ascertaining that by uniting his friends
THE FIRST YEAR AT QUINNIPIAC. 9 1
in Wethersfield with those who had followed him across
the sea, he could become the minister of a new planta-
tion, and stand foremost if not alone in the eldership of
its church, he naturally preferred such a position to that
of a colleagueship with Davenport.
Prudden's friends having determined to commence a
new plantation at Wepowaug, land was formally con-
veyed to them by a written deed subscribed by Ansan-
taway the sachem of the place and by his council, Feb.
12, 1639. Lambert relates that "a twig and a piece of
turf being brought to the sagamore, he placed the end
of the branch in the clod, and then gave it to the Eng-
lish as a token that he thereby surrendered to them the
soil, with all the trees and appurtenances.*' But, though
the land was bought in February, the projected planta-
tion was not commenced till autumn, so that those who
intended to remove from Quinnipiac remained in their
houses through the summer, and cultivated their fields
as they had done the previous year.
We find nothing more on record concerning the first
winter at Quinnipiac, except that two vessels, bound
thither from Boston, were cast away in December,
there being, says Winthrop, "so great a tempest of
wind and snow, all the night and the next day, as had
not been since our time." We may conjecture that
the work of removal was not yet entirely accomplished,
— that some who had come from Massachusetts in the
preceding spring, and had spent the summer and au-
tumn in the erection of houses, wqre npw transporting
to their new homes comforts for which there had been
no place in their summer habitations.
i
CHAPTER VI.
FOUNDATIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STATE.
THE spring of 1639 found the plantation at Quin-
nipiac no farther advanced in its ecclesiastical or
its civil organization than on the morrow after its " first
day of extraordinary humiliation." Its public property
was still managed by the members, or in ordinary cases,
by the officers, of the joint-stock association. Civil
government was administered, if at all, by a democ-
racy acknowledging rto authority but that of God, and
no constitution but God*s word as contained in the
Scriptures. Public worship was regularly offered, but
no church had been instituted and no sacraments
had been celebrated.
Several reasons may be suggested for the slowness
with which the planters came to the work of organi-
zation. They had much to occupy their minds and
hands during the first summer, in providing for the ap-
proaching winter. During the winter the Yorkshire
people were exercised in mind with the question,
whether they should remain, or go back to Massachu-
setts, and, till this question was decided, were not ready
to unite with any church. The leading men in the
plantation would naturally prefer to wait for their de-
cision, rather than to proceed immediately with an
92
FOUND A TIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STA TE, 93
organization which did not include so desirable an
addition.
The Hereford men began in the autumn, and perhaps
late in the summer, to think of removing, and by mid-
winter had purchased lahd at Milford, and thus were
fully committed. So long as they were hesitating, their
brethren would wait for their decision as they had done
for that of the Yorkshire people, though with a different
feeling toward their proposal to remove. There is no
reason to believe that the people of Quinnipiac -were
unwilling that a new plantation should be established a
few miles west of their own ; for^ if their population
should be thereby somewhat diminished, those who re-
moved would still be near them, and would draw to the
neighborhood a considerable accession of planters. So
far as appears, Prudden and Davenport were as much at
one in their plans after the former had decided to estab-
lish a new plantation, as before.
We may find another reason for the slowness with
which the planters came to the work of laying founda-
tions of Church and State, in the difference of opinion
which prevailed among them in regard to such founda-
tions. Some had been non-conforming members of the
Church of England ; others had separated themselves
from the national church while still residing in the
mother-country. In other words, there were in the
colony both Puritans and Separatists. But, so far as
concerns church organization, these two classes were
practically agreed. As the Puritans of Massachusetts
felt themselves obliged to follow the example of the
Separatists at Plymouth in organizing their churches,
80 at Quinnipiac those who had never yet belonged to
94 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
a Congregational church saw that such a church was the
only ecclesiastical organization possible to them in their
circumstances. There was a difference of opinion, how-
ever, in the colony, on the question whether civil author-
ity should be confined to men who were in communion
with the church ; and this difference was to a great ex-
tent coincident with the division into the two classes of
Puritans and Separatists. The Puritan planters of Mas-
sachusetts relinquished episcopacy because they did not
see their way clear to retain it ; but they would not relin-
quish the old English idea that the State should be gov-
erned by Christians only, and that the Christian charac-
ter thus required should be certified by the Church.
Following the Separatists at Plymouth in organizing
their churches, they would not follow them in admitting
to the elective franchise planters who were not church- *
members. The English idea long prevailed in Massa-
chusetts ; but the Plymouth or Separatist belief that
church-membership is not an essential qualification of
free burgesses gradually gained adherents. When the
river-towns in Connecticut were planted by emigrants
from Massachusetts, so much progress had been made
from the Puritan toward the Separatist theory, that
church-membership was never required in the colony
of Connecticut as a qualification for the elective fran-
chise.
There being in the colony at Quinnipiac some who
belonged to Congregational churches, and some who
had never separated from the Church of England, there
was a tendency in these two classes to divide on the
question whether civil authority should be confined to
members of the church. The Separatists desired to lay
FOUND A TIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STA TE. 95
the foundations of both Church and State in accordance
with the Plymouth model. Their leader, Samuel Eaton,
stood up for the principle that all free planters, that is,
proprietors in the plantation, however they might dele-
gate authority, should have power to resume it into
their own hands. But Davenport, who had never been
a Separatist, and would have been content to remain in
the Establishment if only his party had been in the
ascendant, stoutly defended with Scriptural arguments
the position that the power of choosing magistrates, of
making and repealing laws, of dividing inheritances, and
of deciding differences, should be vested in church-
members. In the course of the debate between them
Davenport wrote a treatise, afterward printed and still
extant, entitled, " A Discourse about Civil Government
in a New Plantation whose Design is Religion." Ulti-
mately the views of Davenport prevailed over all op-
position, but not till a long time had been consumed in
the discussion.
On the fourth day of June, 1639, ^ nieeting of all the
proprietors, or free planters as they were called, was
held in the barn of Mr. Robert Newman, "to consult
about settling civil government according to God, and
about the nomination of persons that might be found
by consent of all, fittest in all respects for the founda-
tion work of a church." In reporting this meeting we
shall chiefly use the language 'of the contemporary
record : —
** For the better enabling them to discern the mind of God and
to agree accordingly concerning the establishment of civil order,
Mr. John Davenport propounded divers queries to ihem, publicly
praying them to consider seriously in the presence and fear of God
96 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
the weight of the business they met about, and not to be rash or
slight in giving their votes to things they understood not, but to
digest fully and thoroughly what should be propounded to them,
and without respect to men, as they should be satisfied and per-
suaded in their own minds, to give their answers in such sort as
they would be willing they should stand upon record for posterity."
At the earnest request of Mr. Davenport, —
'* Mr. Robert Newman was entreated to write in characters and
to read distinctly and audibly in the hearing of all the people what
was propounded and accorded on, that it might appear that all
consented to matters propounded, according to words written by
him."
Mr. Davenport then proposed his queries as fol-
lows : —
"Query i. — Whether the Scriptures do hold forth a perfect
rule for the direction and government of all men in all duties which
they are to perform to Go^ and men as well in the government of
families and commonwealths as in matters of the church.
'' This was assented unto by all, no man dissenting, as was ex-
pressed by holding up of hands. Afterward it was read over to
them that they might see in what words their vote was expressed.
They again expressed their consent thereto by holding up their
hands, no man dissenting.
" Query 2. — Whereas there was a covenant solemnly made by
the whole assembly of free planters of this plantation the first day
of extraordinary humiliation which we had after we came together,
that as in matters that concern the gathering and ordering of a
church, so likewise in all public oflSces which concern civil order,
as choice of magistrates and officers, making and repealing of laws,
dividing allotments of inheritance, and all things of like nature, we
would all of us be ordered by those rules which the Scripture holds
forth to us (this covenant was called a plantation covenant to dis-
tinguish it from a church covenant which could not at that time be
made, a church not being then gathered, but was deferred till a
church might be gathered according to God); it was demanded
FOUNDATIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STATE, 97
whether all the free planters do hold themselves bound by that
covenant in all business of that nature which are expressed in the
covenant to submit themselves to be ordered by the rules held forth
in the Scripture.
*^ This also was assented to by all, and no man gainsaid it, and
they did testify the same by holding up their hands, both when it
was first propounded, and confirmed the same by holding up their
hands when it was read unto them in public. John Clarke, being
absent when the covenant was made, doth now manifest his con-
sent to it : also Richard Beach, Andrew Low, Goodman Banister,
Arthur Halbidge, John Potter, Robert Hill, John Brockett, and
John Johnson, being not admitted planters when the covenant was
made, do now express their consent to it.
" Query 3. — Those who have been received as free planters
and are settled in the plantation with a purpose, resolution and
desire that they may be admitted into church fellowship according
to Christ as soon as God shall fit them thereunto, were desired to
express it by holding up of hands : accordingly all did express this
to be their desire and purpose by holding up their hands twice, viz.,
both at the proposal of it, and after when these written words were
read unto them."
The response to this question is instructive, as it
shows that all the proprietors were earnestly religious
men, were desirous of being admitted to the communion
of the church, and, if they had not already become con-
scious of spiritual enlightenment wrought in them by
the Spirit of God, were hoping for such an experience
to qualify them for such admission. The "purpose,
resolution, and desire " to be admitted into church-fel-
lowship thus unanimously declared, prepare us to learn
with less astonishment that in response to the fifth
query, to which those that preceded logically conducted,
they voted to confine the elective franchise to church-
members.
98 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
" Query 4. — All the free planters were called upon to express
whether they held themselves bound to establish such civil order
as might best conduce to the securing of the purity and peace of
the ordinances to themselves and their posterity according to God.
In answer hereunto they expressed by holding up their hands twice
as before, that they held themselves bound to establish such as
might best conduce to the ends aforesaid."
After some remarks by Mr. Davenport, the fifth query
was propounded as follows : —
"Query 5. — Whether free burgesses shall be chosen out of
church members, they that are in the foundation work of the church
being actually free burgesses and to choose to themselves out of
the like estate of church fellowship : and the power of choosing
magistrates and officers from among themselves, and the power of
making and repealing laws according to the word, and the dividing
of inheritances, and deciding of difEerences that may arise, and all
the businesses of like nature are to be transacted by those free bur-
gesses.
"This was put to vote and agreed unto by the lifting up of
hands twice as in the former it was done. Then one man stood up
after the vote was past, expressing his dissent from the rest in part,
yet granting ist, That magistrates should be men fearing God;
2d, That the church is the company whence ordinarily such men
may be expected; 3d, That they that choose them ought to be
men fearing God : only at this he stuck that free planters ought
not to give this power out of their hands. Another stood up and
answered that in this case nothing was done but with their consent.
The former answered that all the free planters ought to resume
this power into their own hands again if things were not orderly
carried. Mr. Theophilus Eaton answered that in all places they
choose committees; in like manner the companies of London
choose the liveries by whom the public magistrates are chosen.
In this the rest are not wronged, because they expect in time to
be of the liver)' themselves and to have the same power. Some
others entreated the former to give his arguments and reasons
whereupon he dissented. He refused to do it, and said th(^y might
FOUNDATIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STATE, 99
not rationally demand it, seeing he let the vote pass on freely and
did not speak till after it was past, because he would not hinder
what they agreed upon. Then Mr. Davenport, after a short rela-
tion of some former passages between them two * about this ques-
tion, prayed the company that nothing might be concluded by them
in this mighty question but what themselves were persuaded to be
agreeing with the mind of God, and [as] they had heard what had
been said since the voting, entreated them again to consider of it
and put it again to vote as before."
The assembly having again unanimously assented,
and some who had previously leaned to the opposite
side, or halted between the two opinions, having given
vocal expression to their confidence that the action
taken was "according to the mind of God revealed in
the Scriptures: — *'
" Mr. Robert Newman was desired to write it as an order, where-
unto every one that hereafter should be admitted here as planters
should submit and testify the same by subscribing their names to the
order, namely, that church-members only shall be free burgesses,
and that they only shall choose magistrates and officers among
themselves."
The elective franchise being thus limited to church-
members, the assembly proceeded to consider and de-
termine what method they should pursue in organizing
their church : —
" Mr. Davenport advised that the names of such as were to be
admitted might be publicly propounded, to the end that they who
' Although the name of the " one man " who dissented is not given in
the record, there can be no doubt that it was Samuel Eaton. Mather
records the tradition that it was he ; and the treatise of Davenport bears
internal evidence that it was addressed to one of his clerical friends in the
plantation, that is to Eaton or Prudden. Hut Prudden could not have
been the dissentient speaker to the assembly in Mr. Newman's barn; for
he and his company, having resolved to remove, took no part in laying the
foundations of civil order in Qwnnipiac.
lOO HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
were most approved might be chosen ; for the town being cast into
several private meetings, wherein they that dwelt nearest together
gave their accounts one to another of God*s gracious work upon
them, and prayed together and conferred to their mutual edifica-
tion, sundry of them had knowledge one of another, and in every
meeting some one was more approved of all than any dther. For
this reason and to avoid scandals, the whole company was entreated
to consider whom they found fittest to nominate for this work."
The sixth query was then read in these words, viz. : —
" Whether are you all willing and do agree in this, that twelve
men be chosen that their fitness for the foundation work may be
tried ; however there may be more named, yet it may be in their
power who are chosen to reduce them to twelve, and it be in the
power of those twelve to choose out of themselves seven that shall
be most approved of the major part to begin the church.
'* This was agreed upon by consent of all, as was expressed by
holding up of hands, and that so many as should be thought fit for
the foundation work of the church shall be propounded by the
plantation and written down and pass without exception unless
they had given public scandal or ofEence ; yet so as in case of pub-
lic scandal or offence, every one should have liberty to propound
their exceptions at that time publicly against any man that should
be nominated when all their names should be written down ; but if
the offence were private, that men's names might be tendered, so
many as were offended were entreated to deal with the offender
privately, and if he gave not satisfaction, to bring the matter to the
twelve that they might consider of it impartially and in the fear of
God. The names of the persons nominated arid agreed upon were
Mr. Theophilus Eaton, Mr. John Davenport, Mr. Robert Newman,
Mr. Matthew Gilbert, Mr. Richard Malbon, Mr. Nathanael Turner,
Ezekiel Cheever, Thomas Fugill, John Punderson, William Andrews
and Jeremiah Dixon.* No exception was brought against any of
those in public, except one about taking an excessive rate for meal
* The registrar omitted one of the twelve names. Was the name ot
the penitent extortioner designedly dropped, or was the omission acci-
dental?
FOUNDATIONS LAID IN CHURCH AND STATE, lOI
which he sold to one of Pequonock in his need, which he confessed
with grief, and declared that having been smitten in heart and
troubled in his conscience, he restored such a part of the price
back again with confession of his sin to the party as he thought him-
self bound to do. And it being feared that the report of the sin was
heard farther than the report of his satisfaction, a course was con-
cluded on to make the satisfaction known to as many as heard of
the sin. It was also agreed upon at the said meeting that if the
persons above named did find themselv£s straitened in the number
of fit men for the seven, that it should be free for them to take into
trial of fitness such other as they should think meet, provided that
it should be signified to the town, upon the Lord's day, whom they
so take in, that every man may be satisfied of them according to ^
the course formerly taken."
In due time the twelve thus appointed chose out of
their own number the following seven, as "most ap-
proved of the major part, to begin the church," namely,
Theophilus Eaton, John Davenport, Robert Newman,
Matthew Gilbert, Thomas Fugill, John Punderson, and
Jeremiah Dixon. " By these seven persons, covenant-
ing together, and then receiving others into their fel-
lowship, the first church of Christ in New Haven was
gathered and constituted on the 22d of August, 1639." ^
On the 25th of October these seven proceeded to
organize themselves as a civil court, proceeding as
follows, " after solemn prayer unto God : " —
" First : All former power or trust for managing any public affairs
in this plantation, into whose hands soever formerly committed, was
now abrogated and from henceforward utterly to cease.
* Bacon's Hist. Dis., p. 24. Dr. Bacon ascertains the date from the
records of the First Church in Milford, which was gathered in New
Haven, where its members still resided, and, as the local tradition says,
on the same day with the New Haven church. Mather (Mag., Book HI.,
ch. 6) records the tradition somewhat differently, giving to each church
one of two consecutive days employed in the formalities of institution.
I02 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" Secondly : All those that have been received into the fellow-
ship of this church since the gathering of it, or who, being members
of other approved churches, offered themselves, were admitted as
members of this court: namely, Mr. Nathaniel Turner, William
Andrews and Mr. Cheever, members of this church ; Mr. Samuel
Eaton, John Clark, Lieutenant Seeley, John Chapman, Thomas
Jeffrey, and Richard Hull, members of other approved churches."
The court then proceeded to choose Theophilus
Eaton "magistrate for the term of one whole year;"
and Robert Newman, Matthew Gilbert, Nathanael
Turner, and Thomas Fugill, "deputies to assist the
magistrate in all courts called by him for the occa-
sions of the plantation for the same term of one whole
year."
Thomas Fugill was chosen clerk, and Robert Seeley
marshal.
'Mt was further agreed that there should be a renewing of the
choice of all officers every year at a general court to be held for
this plantation the last week in October yearly ; and that the word
of God shall be the only rule to be attended unto in ordering the
affairs of government in this plantation."
The formal institution of civil authority may have
been hastened by foresight of an event which imme-
diately followed ; for, the next day after the magistrate
had been clothed with power, an Indian named Nepau-
puck was brought before him upon his warrant, charged
with the murder of an Englishman at Wethersfield. A
few days afterward a general court was assembled, and
the prisoner was brought before it for trial. Being found
guilty upon evidence so clear that he confessed his guilt,
he was condemned to death. "Accordingly his head
was cut off the next day, and pitched upon a pole in the
market-place."
17
CHAPTER VII.
DIVISION OF LAND.
WE have already seen that immediately after the
town-plot was laid out, a house-lot was assigned
to every free planter ; by which appellation a person
who had invested in the common property of the plan-
tation was distinguished from other inhabitants. These
house-lots were so large as to require, in most cases, all
the labor their owners could give to husbandry during
the first two summers. The few who needed more land
for cultivation were allowed to plant in *' the neck " be-
tween Mill River and Quihnipiac River. So desirable
did the proprietors regard the increase of population,
that they not only made the quantity of land thus as-
signed to a free planter to depend partly on the num-
ber of persons in his family, but also freely assigned a
small lot on the outside of the town-plot to every house-
holder in the plantation who desired to become a perma-
nent resident, but was unable to purchase a share in the
common property. The number of householders thus
gratuitously supplied with house-lots was in the begin-
ning thirty-two. Others were afterward added.
In January, 1640, arrangements were made for the
division of the neck, the salt meadows, and a tract
which, extending in every direction about a mile from
103
I04 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
the town, was called the two-miles-square. The divis-
ion was so arranged that every free planter should
have some land in the neck, some in the meadows, and
some in the upland of the two-miles-square.
Out of the last-mentioned tract certain reservations
were made ; and the remainder was divided into nine
parts, one for each of the nine quarters into which the
town was divided, each quarter in the town having its
out-lands as nearly as possible contiguous to itself. In
consequence of this arrangement, these sections of out-
lands were also called quarters ; and, there being more
occasion for using the term in connection with the
out-lands than the home-lots, it came by degrees to be
applied almost exclusively to them in later records.
Commencing with the east-centre, or Mr. Davenport's
quarter, let us connect the nine quarters with out-lands
assigned to them respectively in the first division. The
out-lands of Mr. Davenport's quarter were bounded by
Chapel Street, Grand Street, a line about three hundred
feet east of State Street, and Mill River. Mr. Eaton's
quarter was bounded by Grand Street, State Street (or,
as it was called, Neck Lane), a line in continuation of
that just mentioned, described as three hundred feet east
of State Street, and the meadows bordering on Mill
River. Mr. Newman's quarter was bounded by Neck
Lane, Mill Lane (as Orange Street was called). Grove
Street, and the meadows bordering on Mill River. Mr.
Tench's quarter, lying between Mill Lane and Prospect
Street, extended outward from Grove Street so far as
was necessary to furnish every planter in the quarter
with his proportionate allotment.
It will be seen, that, while Mr. Davenport's quarter
DIVISION OF LAND, I OS
had their out-lands near their home-lots, Mr. Tench's
out-land quarter only touched his town quarter, and that,
if the out-lands of the next quarter had been assigned
so as to be contiguous to those of Mr. Tench's quarter,
they would have been far distant from the home-lots to
which they belonged. This difficulty was solved by the
sequestration of land lying west of Prospect Street, for
common use. This tract included the cow-pasture, the
ox-pasture, the Beaver-pond meadows, and a field far-
ther west than these, which remained unfenced, and
was called the Common.
By means of this sequestration, the out-lands of the
Yorkshire quarter were so assigned that they were im-
mediately contiguous to the house-lots to which they
belonged, lying between the common land on the north
and Chapel Street on the south, and extending from
York Street westward to or beyond West River. The
Herefordshire quarter, lying between Chapel Street and
Oak Street, extended from York Street to or beyond the
river. Mr. Gregson's out-land quarter lay south of the
Herefordshire quarter, and was bounded on the east by
the road to Milford, which passed through Broad Street
and Davenport Avenue, as they are now named. Next
was the suburbs quarter, between Milford Road and
Washington Street. Last in our enumeration, Mr.
Lamberton's quarter covered all the land between Wash-
ington Street and the harbor.
There still remained within the two-miles-square four
reservations besides those which have been mentioned :
viz., one called the market-place ; another containing so
much of the land bordering on the West Creek as had
not been allotted to persons who were not proprietors ;
I06 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
a third containing the land bordering on the East Creek ;
a fourth called Oyster-shell Field, east of the East
Creek reservation, and comprehended between Chapel
Street and a line about three hundred feet north of
East Water Street. The last-named tract was leased
from year to year to persons who desired to cultivate
more land than they owned The reserved land on
both sides of the two creeks was either allotted in small
parcels to persons who were not proprietors, or was
reserved to be so disposed of when there should be
occasion.
In the first division of out-lands, no provision was
made for those who had been gratuitously supplied with
house-lots ; but in the second division the rule was
,o3 adopted to allot "six acres for a single person, eight
acres for a man and his wife, with an acre added for
every child they have at present." If they accepted
these out-lands, they were to pay taxes on them as other
planters did, at the rate of twopence per acre ; and " if
any of them, satisfied with their trades, or not liking
the place of their allotment, shall refuse or neglect to
take up the land, yet every one admitted to be a planter
shall pay twelvepence a year to the treasurer toward
public charges."
The out-lands thus assigned- to each of the nine quar-
ters were subdivided according to the same rule of
division which had obtained in the division of the town
quarters ; every planter having ** a proportion of land
according to the proportion of estate which he hath
given in, and number of heads in his family." Five
acres were allowed for every hundred pounds of estate,
and an equal quantity for every two heads. These sub-
DIVISION OF LAND, lO/
divisions, however, were not separated one from another
by division fences ; but each quarter was enclosed by a
common fence, for his proportion of which every pro-
prietor was responsible. As might be expected, much
legislation and frequent fines were necessary to keep
these fences sufficient for the protection of the enclos-
ures from the forays of hungry cattle.
The meadows were sufficient to afford five acres for
every hundred pounds of estate and half an acre for
every head, and an addition in quantity to some allot-
ments where the quality was inferior. The neck was
divided so as to give one acre for every hundred pounds,
and half an acre for every head.
Some months after this division was ordered, and, as
it would seem, before it was consummated, a second
allotment was made, disposing of those portions of the
common property which lay outside of the two-miles-
square. At a general court held the 23d of October,
1640, it was " ordered that in the second division every
planter in the town shall have for every hundred pounds
of estate given in, twenty acres of upland, and for every
head two acres and a half."
The sequestered lands were held as common property
for many years, but were ultimately divided, one portion
after another, till, with some unimportant exceptions,
only the market-place was held in common. After the
second division of lands, and probably in fulfilment of
an order passed at the general court mentioned above,
that "all the upland in the first division, with all the
meadows in the plantation,, shall pay fooirpence an acre
yearly ; and all the land in the second division shall pay
twopence an acre yearly, at two several days of payment.
I08 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
viz., the one in April, and the other in October, to raise
a common stock or public treasury," the following sched-
ule was prepared, exhibiting the name of every proprie-
tor, the number of persons in his family, the amount of
his estate, and the number of acres belonging to him
in each of four classes of land ; viz., the first division of
upland, the neck, the meadows, and the second divis-
ion of upland. The eighth and last column shows the
amount of his annual tax. The schedule, though pre-
pared before April, 1641, is found in the record-book
amid the records of 1643. It is not easy to determine
whether it was copied into the record-book in 1643,
after some changes had been made corresponding with
changes of title ; or was recorded when first prepared,
the secretary reserving for his report of the court's
proceedings the thirty pages which precede it.'
This schedule furnishes important aid in determining
who were proprietors of the town in the first years of
its history, the social importance of each so far as the
measure of his wealth determined it, and, when studied
in connection with the land-records of the town, the
location of his house-lot. The schedule disposes the
proprietors into eleven groups ; eight of which occu-
pied the eight squares surrounding the market-place ;
another group, consisting of only four, had their dwell-
ings on East Water Street, fronting the harbor; the
remaining two inhabited the two blocks of land of irreg-
ular shape, called suburbs.
' " Mr. Crane resigned Mr. Hickock*s lot into the town's hand," Sept
30, 1641 ; yet the lot stands in Mr. Hickock's name. There is so much
probability that the schedule was recorded before the collection of the rate
due in April, 1641, that it will be designated as the schedule of 164 1.
DIV/SIOJ^ OF LAND.
OaiidVaie . .
Willkm Tmile .
CapL Turner .
RicbudPcny .
Mr- DvvcDpon . .
Rkhard Malboa
Tboftuu KtmbcdcT
t. Rswc. . . .
GvDT^ IjiDtbntan .
Thomu lifrriu
RobOlSxIcy
JshnPudd .
WULui Prawi
Beniamip Fenn
WLlliilil louct
KHET AlLillE .
Mr. HKkocE .
Mi. Muufidd
Saijni GoDdyeu .
WnLuD Havkiiu .
ThamuWddi .
WilUim Fowkr .
Til
HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Widmr Baldwin. .
AnEIdH . . . .
RichirdPlan . .
ZachjiTUh WluDDiui
Thmniu Otbonie .
Thonuu Tmobridgc
Ednid Banniiti:
Anthony Thompscn
George Smilh
Widow ShermiD
Matihew Moulib
Widow Crow' .
ThonuiVak:.
Thaaiai FuEiU
John Pundmisi
ft!:
DIVISION OF LAND.
1^1^ Fu|
Hvnry Bnrwnmff ,
Un,Hiigin>on. .
-1-anJTWli , .
W-|dii> WiHii^' '.
ioluiQiSo
l>lvIdAtw;
Ur. MinluU . .
GcDTic Wild
Ji_
I II 06
t 09 <i6
;3S
Is
Commencing with this distribution of the proprietors
into groups, and studying the land-records of the town,
one may assign to almost every proprietor his house-lot
in respect of location and, approximately, of measure.
The map opposite the title-page was drawn with these
112 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
aids.' It locates the house-lots of all the proprietors ex-
cept eleven. Of the thirty-two non-proprietors, seven
had " small lots ** given them on East Water Street, east
of the lots of the four proprietors who lived on that
street, and twenty-five were accommodated between
George Street and the West Creek.
While the division of lands was in progress, the name
of the plantation was changed, by order of a general
court held on the first day of September, 1640, from Quin-
nipiac to New Haven. There is no reason for believing
that any of .the planters came from the port of that name
on the southern shore of England, and the record gives
no clew to the reasons which influenced the court in
* The author of this history is alone responsible for the map ; but he
thankfully acknowledges his obligation to Henry White, Esq., for the
use of manuscript volumes which trace the land-titles from the original
to the present proprietors, and for assistance in the solution of difficult
problems. He feels some degree of confidence in regard to all the eleven
groups, except that occupying the suburb on the west side of West Creek.
Several transfers of title occurred in this group before the recording of
alienations was imperative, and the shape of the quarter has been so
changed that its original boundaries have not been ascertained. Only
three, therefore, of the proprietors in this quarter have been located on
the map ; namely, William Ives, George Smith, and Widow Sherman.
The dotted lines on the map represent fences of uncertain location. A
street, cut from the corner of George and York Streets through to Oak
Street, would be in line with Oak Street, and I am credibly informed that
there was such a street ; but how Mr. Gregson*s quarter was bounded on
the side toward the town, I cannot determine. The dotted lines on one
side of the suburb lying west of West Creek are nearly coincident with
the lines of Lafayette Street; but I am told that Lafayette is a modem
street. There must have been an ancient lane nearly coincident with it,
since one of the lots is described in 1679 ^is bounded east by the street
(Hill Street), and " west by the way that goeth down to Jonathan Lamson*s
lot on the bankside."
DIVISION OF LAND. 1 1 3
naming their plantation. In dropping the aboriginal
designation, and adopting one familiar to Englishmen,
they followed the custom of their time. They did it
perhaps partly for their own pleasure, but more for the
gratification of friends ; for in the course of two years,
use must have greatly diminished the uncouthness, to
English ears, of the Indian name. A letter of Daven-
port to his early friend and patron, Lady Vere, is extant,
in which he speaks of the arrival, in the summer of
1639, ^^ ^^ first ship from England ; and in it he says,
" The sight of the harbor did so please the captain of
the ship, and all the passengers, that he called it the
Fair Haven." Perhaps this attempt of the English
captain to give an English name occasioned the formal
action of the court a twelvemonth afterward, which is
thus recorded, "This town now called New Haven.**
Perhaps, also, this ship which first cast anchor in the
harbor of New Haven, bringing passengers from Kent,
Surrey, and Sussex, had weighed anchor in the port of
that name on the coast of Sussex.
CHAPTER VIII.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION.
WITH the map in hand, let us survey the town,
and review the list of proprietors. As we pass
around the several quarters, perhaps no time will be
more suitable for such information in regard to the
colonists as is obtainable and of sufficient importance
to be recorded.
Commencing with the north-east quarter, we find a
large part of it owned by Gov. Eaton and his rela-
tions. The governor's homestead was on Elm Street,
about equidistant from the comers of the square. Here
he lived with his wife, his mother, his four children, and
the two sons of his wife by her first husband. In later
years Mrs. Hopkins, wife of Edward Hopkins, the gov-
ernor of Hartford, having become incurably insane,
spent much time in the family under the care of her
mother." Several young persons of both sexes, wards
' Winthrop writes in his diary April 13, 1645: "Mr. Hopkins, the
governor of Hartford upon Connecticut, came to Boston and brought his
wife with him (a godly young woman and of special parts), who was fallen
into a sad infirmity, the loss of her understanding and reason, which had
been growing upon her divers years, by occasion of her giving herself
wholly to reading and writing, and had written many books. Her hus-
band, being very loving and tender of her, was loath to grieve her ; but he
"4
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION. IIJ
of Eaton, also found a home under his roof. In addi-
tion, there was, as appears from the records, a numerous
retinue of servants for the work of the house and of the
field. Mather says that the family sometimes consisted
of not less than thirty persons.
The New Haven Colony Historical Society has in its
possession a portrait said to have belonged to the
Eaton family. It was painted in 1635, and in the
twenty-fifth year of the age of the lady whom it pictures.
In one corner is a coat of arms, which, in connection
with the dates, may determine whether it represents
Mrs. Hopkins, the daughter of Mrs. Eaton by her first
husband, or Mary, the daughter of Gov, Eaton by his
taw his error when it was too lace. For if slic had attended het household
aflairs and such things as belong to women, and not gone out al her wav
and calling to meddle in such things as are proper for men, whose minds
are stronger. &c., she had kept her wits, and might have improved them
iMdullj and honorably in the place God had set her."
Il6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
first wife, or some other lady. At present the question
is in suspense.
The principal apartment of the dwelling-house, de-
nominated, as in the mother-country, the hall, was the
first to be entered. It was suflSciently spacious to ac-
commodate the whole family when assembled at meals
and at prayers. It contained, according to the inven-
tory taken after the governor's decease, "a drawing-
table,'* "a round table," "green cushions," "a great
chair with needlework," "high chairs," "high stools,"
"low chairs," "low stools," "Turkey carpets," "high
wine stools," and "great brass andirons."
" The parlor," probably adjoining the hall and having
windows opening upon the street, served as a withdraw-
ing-room, to which the elder members of the family and
their guests retired from the crowd and bustle of the
hall. But, according to the fashion of the time, the
parlor contained the furniture of a bedroom, and was
occasionally used as the sleeping-apartment of a guest.
Mather, speaking of Eaton's manner of life, says that
" it was his custom when he first rose in the morning to
repair unto his study ; " and again, that, "being a great
reader, all the time he could spare from company and
business, he commonly spent in his beloved study''
There is no mention in the inventor}' of " the study,"
but perhaps the apartment referred to by Mather was
described by the appraisers as "the counting-house,"
the two names denoting that it was used both as a
library and as an oflSce.
If these three rooms filled the front of the mansion,
the reader may locate behind them at his own discretion
the winter-kitchen, the summer-kitchen, the buttery, the
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION II7
pantry, — offices necessarily implied, even if not men-
tioned as connected with an extensive homestead of
the seventeenth century, — and then add the brew-house
and the warehouse, both mentioned in the inventory.
Of the sleeping-apartments in the second story, the
green chamber, so called from the color of its drapery,
was chief in the expensiveness and elegance of its furni-
ture, and presumably in its size, situation, and wainscot-
ing. The walls of the blue chamber were hung with
tapestry, but the green drapery was of better quality
than the blue. The blue chamber had a Turkey carpet,
but the appraisers set a higher value on the carpet in
the green chamber. All the other sleeping-rooms were
furnished each with a feather-bed of greater or less
value, but the green chamber had a bed of down. In
this chamber, probably, was displayed the silver basin
and ewer, double gilt, and curiously wrought with gold,
which the Fellowship of Eastland Merchants had pre-
sented to Mrs. Eaton, in acknowledgment of her hus-
band's services as their agent in the countries about
the Baltic. The appraisers valued it at forty pounds
sterling, but did not put it in the inventory because
Mrs. Eaton claimed it as "her proper estate.*'
There was in the house, in addition to the bowl and
ewer, plate to the value of one hundred and seven
pounds, eleven shillings, sterling. Taking into consid-
eration all that we know of the house and furniture,
we must conclude with Hubbard, that the governor
"maintained a port in some measure answerable to
his place."
Samuel Eaton, who owned and occupied the land
between his brother's premises and State Street, ob-
\
Il8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
taining in 1640 from the court a grant of Totoket, "for
such friends as he shall bring over from old England,
and upon such terms as shall be agreed betwixt himself
and the committee chosen to that purpose/' sailed for
the mother-country, to return with a band of colonists
and settle a new plantation at Branford. But he found
his friends well pleased with the new condition of affairs
in England, and unwilling to emigrate. He himself, pre-
ferring to remain in his native land, sent a power^f-
attomey to his brother ; by whom the corner-lot, which
had been Samuel Eaton's, was sold in 1649 to Francis
Newman. It afterward became the property of James
Bishop, and remained in his family more than two
centuries.
Edward Hopkins, though he settled in Hartford, was
one of the first proprietors of Quinnipiac. At a court
held the third day of November, 1639, the town ordered,
"that Mr. Hopkins shall have two hogsheads of lime
for his present use, and as much more as will finish his
house as he now intends it, he thinking that two hogs-
heads more will serve." One can scarcely doubt that
Mr. Hopkins's house was in the same quarter with that
of his beloved father-in-law; but the tax-schedule of
1641 does not contain his name, and there is no exist-
ing record of the alienation of the house and land. The
order concerning the lime seems to imply that he had
made some change in his intentions, and we may infer
that his determination to settle in Hartford was formed
after the house was begun and before it was finished.
Having spent some time in Connecticut, while his
fellow-passengers in the Hector were sojourning in
Massachusetts, he did not rejoin them when they re-
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION. II9
moved to Quinnipiac, though he retained his interest
as a joint-proprietor in their plantation. Becoming
gradually adherent to Connecticut, where he sat as a
deputy in the General Court as early as March, 1638,
and was chosen to assist in the magistracy in April,
1639* J^^ probably sold his estate in New Haven before
the tax-schedule of 1641 was written ; but which of the
proprietors in the governor's quarter succeeded him,
cannot be determined. Though removed from daily
intercourse with Eaton, he cherished such love for him
to the end of life, that, as he lay on his death-bed in
England, he said, "How often have I pleased myself
with thoughts of a joyful meeting with my father
Eaton ! I remember with what pleasure he would
come down the street, that he might meet me when I
came from Hartford to New Haven ; but with how
much greater pleasure shall we shortly meet one an-
other in heaven ! " In his will, after providing for his
"poor distressed wife," and giving to friends tokens of
his affection, he bequeathed his estate to trustees for
the promotion of liberal education in New England.
The Hopkins Grammar School in New Haven owes
its existence to this bequest.
Although we cannot determine with certainty where
Mr. Hopkins's house was situated, it is a plausible con-
jecture that he alienated his land and buildings to
William Tuttle, who, in 1641, owned the lot on the cor-
ner of Grove and State Streets. Mr. Tuttle, who came
over in the Planter in 1635, was, in April, 1639, still
a resident of Boston, as appears from the baptism of
one of his children there on the seventh day of that
month ; but some time in the same year he removed to
120 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Quinnipiac, for he signed the fundamental agreement
before it was copied into the record-book. Although
not a member of the court, he was active and influen-
tial in public affairs. His daughter Elizabeth became
the wife of Richard Edwards of Hartford, and the
mother of Rev. Timothy Edwards of East Windsor,
who numbered among his children the greatest of
American metaphysicians and ten daughters, "every
one of which has been said to be six feet tall, making
sixty feet of daughters, all of them strong in mind." *
• The lot on Grove Street, adjoining Mr. Tuttle's, be-
longed to the mother of Theophilus and Samuel Eaton ;
but, as she was an inmate of the governor's family,
probably no buildings were erected while it was in her
possession. She sold it, in 1646, to Richard Perry.
West of Mrs. Eaton's land was that of David Yale,
who, when the schedule of 1641 was written, was still
unmarried. In 1645 he purchased a house in Boston,
where his second child was born the same year. While
residing in Boston he distinguished himself as a friend
of the Church of England, joining with a few others
in a petition for liberty to use its liturgy. A few years
later he returned to the mother-country, where he re-
mained to the end of life. To his care his still insane
sister was committed by Gov. Hopkins, when he died in
1657. He was the father of Elihu Yale, for whSn Yale
College was named.
Ezekiel Cheever, who lived at the corner of Grove
and Church Streets, came in ^ the Hector from Lon-
don, where he was born, Jan. 25, 161 5. He opened a
school in his own house a few months after he arrived
' Semi-centennial sermon of Rev. Joab Brace, D.D.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 121
at Quinnipiac with the main company of planters, and
was thenceforth the schoolmaster of the plantation,
receiving for some time a yearly stipend of twenty
pounds, which, in 1644, was increased to thirty pounds.
He was one of the twelve chosen for the foundation
work of the Church and State, and, though never or-
dained to the ministry, occasionally preached. Both
in the field of education and in the field of theology he
was an author, having written "A Short Introduction
to the Latin Tongue,*' which he called an " Accidence,*'
and a book on the millennium, under the title " Scripture
Prophecies Explained." He was chosen a member of
the Court for the plantation at its first session, when it
was instituted by the seven appointed for that purpose,
and, in 1646, was one of the deputies to the General
Court of the Jurisdiction. Dissenting from the judg-
ment of the church and its elders, in respect to some
cases of discipline, he commented on their action with
such severity that he was himself censured in 1649.'
Soon after this, and perhaps on account of it, he re-
moved from New Haven, and, according to Mather,
"died in Boston, August 21, 1708, in the ninety-fourth
year of his age, after- he had been a skilful, painful,
faithful schoolmaster for seventy years." President
Stiles mentions two aged clergymen of his acquaintance
who haf been pupils of Cheever, one of whom said,
"that he wore a long white beard, terminating in a
point ; that, when he stroked his beard to the point, it
was a sign to the boys to stand clear."
Nathanael Turner, whose home-lot was on Church
* In Conn. Hist Soc, Coll. I., may be seen the "Trial of Ezekiel
Chccver, before the Church at New Haven."
122 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Street, next south of Mr. Cheever's, came from Eng-
land with Winthrop in 1630, and was one of the most
considerable citizens of Lynn, representing the town in
the first General Court of Massachusetts. In January,
1637, his house was destroyed by fire, "with all that
was in it save the persons ; " and this event happening
the same year that tidings came of " that famous place
called Quinnipiac," with "a fair river, fit for harboring
of ships," and "rich and goodly meadows,** may have
occasioned his removal from Lynn. Having had mili-
tary experience as an officer in the Pequot war, he was
from the beginning intrusted with " the command and
ordering of all martial affairs '* in the new plantation.
To facilitate the performance of this trust it was ordered
by the Court " that Capt. Turner shall have his lot of
meadow and upland where he shall choose it for his
own convenience, that he may attend the service of the
town which his place requires." He accordingly located
a farm about three miles from the market-place, between
East Rock and Quinnipiac River. After his death, if
not before, his family resided at the farm. He was lost
at sea in " the great ship " which sailed from New Haven
in January, 1646.
Richard Perry, the only proprietor in Mr. Eaton's
quarter who has not been mentioned, lived at the comer
of Church and Elm Streets. Having married Mary,
the daughter of Richard Malbon, in the old country, he
accompanied his father-in-law from London to New
Haven. He took an active part in the public affairs
of the plantation, and in 1646, when Fugill, the secre-
tary of the court, had fallen into disgrace, was chosen
to succeed him in that office. He sold his house to
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION. 123
Thomas Kimberly in 1649, and after that date his name
does not occur in the records.
Passing from the north-east square to the east-centre
square, we find Mr. Davenport's lot on the comer of Elm
and State Streets, and his house on Elm Street, nearly
opposite Mr. Eaton's. Here the pastor and his wife
received their only child after a separation from him of
of Yali ClJIeitl
more than two years ; the child having been left in Eng-
land, and brought over by a maid-servant in a ship, which,
in the summer of 1639, sailed from England direct for
the harbor of Quinnipiac.
Richard Malbon lived on State Street, his lot being
next south of Mr. Davenport's. He was one of the
London merchants who came with Eaton and Daven-
port, was one of the twelve chosen for the foundation
of Church and State, and one of the five whom the
124 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
twelve sifted out of that number by their own action
before the foundation was laid. For some reason, prob-
ably for want of church-membership, he was not ad-
mitted a member of the court till February, 1642 ; but
only two months after he was made a freeman, he was
chosen one of four deputies for the half-year ensuing
to assist the magistrates " by way of advice, but not to
have any power by way of sentence," and was the first-
named of the four. Such a limitation was expressly
put upon the deputies in the October election of that
year, and was probably implied in the election six
months before. In this office he was continued for a
long time by re-election, and, after the organization of
the Colonial Government, was often a deputy to repre-
sent the plantation in the General Court of the Juris-
diction. In 1646 he was appointed by that body, one
of its magistrates in New Haven. The town mani-
fested its confidence in him as a military ofpcer by
appointing him " to order the watches and all the mar-
tial affairs of this plantation," during Capt. Turner's
absence at the Delaware Bay in 1642 ; and again, when
Turner was about to embark in the ill-fated ship of 1646,
by choosing Malbon " captain, with liberty to resign his
place to Capt. Turner at his return." Mr. Malbon was
an enterprising merchant, trading coastwise and in the
West Indies. He was also one of "the company of
merchants of New Haven," who chartered for a voyage
to England the ship in which the town lost so much
property and so many valuable lives.
Next south of the Malbon house was that of Thomas
Nash, formerly a member of the church in Leyden, Hol-
land, and one of the five who wrote from that city in
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 125
1625, to their brethren in Plymouth, informing them of
the death of John Robinson, pastor of the church which
included in its membership the planters of Plymouth,
as well as the brethren still sojourning in Leyden. Mr.
Nash came from England to New Haven with Mr. Whit-
field and his company, and was one of the signers of the
agreement which that company made on shipboard to
remain together. But being not only a smith, )3Ut a
gunsmith, it was for the common welfare as well as his
own, that he should have his shop in the largest and
most central plantation. His change of purpose was
probably after the fundamental agreement was made, as
he had not signed his name to it when it was copied
into the record-book. He must have been advanced
beyond the zenith of life, for his eldest son became a
proprietor and a freeman not long after his father.
John Benham probably came from England in 1630,
and had been a freeman in Dorchester, Mass. Remov-
ing to New Haven, he wrought as a brickmaker. As late
as 165 1 he petitioned for compensation for time spent
at the first settlement in searching for clay suitable for
making brick, and his claim was allowed. He was also,
by appointment, town-crier. Although himself a free-
man, he was at one time implicated in what the Gen-
eral Court of the Jurisdiction regarded as "a factious,
if not seditious," opposition to the " fundamental law "
which limited the right of suffrage.
John Chapman had also been a freeman of Massa-
chusetts before he came to New Haven. He removed
to Fairfield in 1647, and thence to Stamford, where he
made his will, 1665.
Thomas Kimberly removed from Dorchester, Mass.,
126 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
to New Haven, where he was admitted a freeman in
November, 1639. ^^ ^s said that his son Eleazar, bap-
tized the same month, was the first child born of Eng-
lish parents in Quinnipiac. Mr. Kimberly was one of
two pound-keepers appointed by the town in Januarys
1643 ; and the pound of which he had charge was situ-
ated on the east side of State Street, opposite the house
of Thomas Nash. Mr. Kimberly had only a small estate
when he came to New Haven, but his five children enti-
tled him under the rule of allotment to a much larger
acreage than he could draw for his estate. After the
removal of Seeley, the first marshal, Kimberly was
appointed to that office.
Matthew Gilbert, who lived at the comer of Chapel
and Church Streets, in a house fronting toward the
market-place, doubtless came with Eaton and Daven-
port from England, for there is no record of him in
Massachusetts ; but whether he had been a citizen of
London, or had come from some other part of the king-
dom, is not known. His election to be one of the seven
founders of the theocracy shows that he was, even in
the beginning of the settlement, held in high estima-
tion ; and the appointment of him as a deacon shows
that he retained the confidence of the church in subse-
quent years. He was honored with political as well as
ecclesiastical office, being first an assistant magistrate
of the jurisdiction, and afterward deputy-governor. A
rough stone still standing on the green, marked " M. G.
80,'* marks the place of his burial. President Stiles con-
jectured that the M was a W, inverted for the purpose
of concealing from his enemies the last resting-place of
William Goffe, the regicide ; but acknowledged that he
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 12/
had not found the least tradition or surmise that Goffe
was buried in New Haven till he himself conjectured it.
The initials are those of Matthew Gilbert ; and, if the
Arabic numerals were designed (as Stiles supposed) to
express that the person buried beneath died in 1680,
they give correctly the date of Gilbert's death. More
probably they were meant to indicate the number of
years he had lived.
Owen Rowe, a citizen of London, took stock in the
plantation company, but could not leave home when
the Hector sailed. He, however, sent his son Nathaniel,
a boy in his teens, under the care of Davenport and the
Eatons. The youth was left behind in Massachusetts
in the spring of 1638, that he might pursue his studies
under the care of Nathanael Eaton, the brother of
Theophilus and Samuel Eaton, who about that time
commenced his extraordinary and disgraceful career as
master of the school afterward called Harvard Col-
lege.' There is extant a pathetic letter from young
Rowe to Gov. Winthrop, complaining that Eaton had
never given him any instruction, and soliciting the gov-
ernor to advise him how he may return to his father.^
Owen Rowe, delaying to come till the civil war broke
out, became a colonel in the Parliamentary army, and,
when King Charles was tried for treason, was one of
the judges who condemned him to death. It appears
from the records, that, like other wealthy friends of New
' The coincidence in time between the arrival of the Hector, and the
appearance of Nathaniel Eaton as an educator, suggests that he may have
come in the same ship with his brothers. Winthrop in his Journal, and
Savage in his Notes thereupon, have jointly given a graphic picture of
him and of his wife, the housekeeper of the college.
' This letter may be found in Appendix II.
128 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
England who did not emigrate, he sent over, as an ad-
venture, some cattle. These were regarded as security
for the expense of fencing, and for the rates to be paid
" in consideration of his lot and estate here given in."
His town-lot was on Church Street, next north of Mr.
Gilbert's. As it touched Mr. Davenport's lot in the
rear, it was ordered by the town (doubtless at the pas-
tor's suggestion), "that when Mr. Rowe's lot shall be
fenced in, our pastor shall have a way or passage eight
feet broad betwixt it and Mr. Crane's lot, that he may
go out of his own garden to the meeting-house." Mr.
Rowe not making his appearance, the lot was, after
some years, divided and granted on certain conditions
to Mr. Davenport, Mr. Gilbert, and Mr. Crane, the
adjoining proprietors.
The lot on the corner of Church and Elm Streets
was at first reserved by the proprietors as a parsonage,
if at Mr. Davenport's death or removal it should be
needed, but afterward was granted to Nicholas Augur,
a practitioner of medicine. This grant had not been
made when the schedule of 1641 was written, and the
earliest mention of Mr. Augur is in 1644. Some rela-
tion of Mr. Augur's troubles as a practitioner of medi-
cine, and of the wretchedness of his death, will be given
in subsequent chapters.
Jasper Crane, the only remaining occupant of the
east-centre square, was presumably from London, as he
was much connected with the London men in various
ways. He first put in his estate at one hundred and
eighty pounds, and land was assigned him according in
amount with that appraisal ; but before the meadows
and the out-lands of the third division were allotted, he
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 129
was permitted to increase his appraisal to four hundred
and eighty pounds, and receive thereafter correspond-
ing allotments of land. He afterward removed to Bran-
ford ; represented that town in the General Court of
the Jurisdiction in 1653, and was afterward chosen to
be a magistrate.
Four lots on East Water Street, fronting the harbor,
were, for the allotment of out-lands, attached to Mr.
Davenport's quarter. Their proprietors were James
Russell, George Ward, Lawrence Ward, and Moses
Wheeler.
Commencing the survey of the south-east square at
the comer of Chapel and State Streets, we find the
house of William Preston, a Yorkshireman, who died
in 1647, leaving a large family, and a small estate here,
which was supplemented by his right in a house, land,
and other goods " in Yorkshire, in a town called Gigles-
weke, in Craven." He and his wife had the care of the
meeting-house, which she was to "sweep and dress"
every week, having one shilling a week for her pains.
He was at one time under the censure of the church,
but in his will describes himself as " a member of the
church of New Haven." '
Next to the premises of Mr. Preston were those of
Richard Mansfield, who came to Quinnipiac with the
other planters as a steward for Mr. Marshall who was
perhaps of London when he engaged in the enterprise,
' Mr. Malbon, Mr. Lamberton, and Mr. Evance contracted with the
town in 1644, to "dig a channel which shall bring boats, at least, to the
end of the street beside William Preston's house, at any time of the tide,
except they meet with some invincible difficulty, which may hinder their
digging the channel so deep."
I30 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
but afterward of Exeter. There was presumably no
house on Mr. Mansfield's lot ; for he was at first in
the service of Mr. Marshall, and afterward, when Mr.
Marshall had abandoned the idea of coming, bought of
him his lot at the corner of Elm and Church Streets.
This became the Mansfield homestead, and a part of
the land remained in possession of the family for sev-
eral generations. It seems, however, from Mr. Mans-
field's will, which was nuncupative, and declared by two
of his neighbors, that at the time of his decease he was
residing at his farm between East Rock and Quinnipiac
River. Being asked if, according to English custom,
he would give more to his elder than to his younger
son, he replied in the negative, alleging that the former
"was a wild boy, and the younger was of a better
spirit.*'
Thomas Jeffrey, who lived next south of Mr. Mans-
field's lot, was by trade a tanner, and doubtless had
reference to his trade in choosing his home-lot ; for a
stream of water flowed through his land at that time,
though it has long since disappeared. At an early day
he relinquished his trade, to become a mariner. In
1647, "Capt. Malbon propounded that the town hath
been ill provided of sergeants, in regard that Sergeant
Jeffrey is abroad much by reason of his occasions at
sea, therefore whether the town will not see cause to
appoint another sergeant in his room, and the rather
seeing Sergeant Jeffrey hath earnestly desired it, as
Lieut. Seeley and Sergeant Munson did testify in court.
The captain also affirmed the same, and that he was
unwilling to move for a change till that now he under-
standeth Sergeant Jeffrey purposeth to employ himself
more fully in sea affairs."
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION I3I
George Lamberton, who lived next south of Sergeant
Jeffrey, was one of the nine proprietors, who, in the
schedule of 1641, are rated at one thousand pounds.
Of these nine, however, five were non-resident, and
soon ceased to pay rates. So that Lamberton was one
of four planters who were excelled only by Theophilus
Eaton in the amount of their estates. He was from his
first appearance in the plantation a mariner, and lost
his life in the ship which, under his command, left the
harbor of New Haven in January, 1646, and was never
afterward heard from. He is mentioned by Ezekiel
Rogers in a letter to Gov. Winthrop, in a manner which
suggests that he had been one of Rogers's flock. His
influence as a man of mind and of substance may have
principally occasioned the large secession of Yorkshire-
men who refused to return to the Bay when sent for
by Rogers.^
William Wilkes, who lived at the corner of State and
George Streets, removed to Quinnipiac from Boston,
where he had resided since 1633. He went to England
in 1644, intending to return ; but, instead of returning,
he sent for his wife to join him in England. She, em-
barking in Lamberton's ship, was lost at sea. News of
Mr. Wilkes*s decease was probably received soon after ;
for a will made by his wife was admitted to probate,
which disposed of their whole estate. The house and
orchard were sold for forty pounds ; the house being
appraised at thirty pounds, and the land at ten pounds.
Benjamin Fenn, proprietor of the lot on George
Street, adjoining the premises of William Wilkes, re-
moved to Milford with the other first planters of that
* See page 8j.
132 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
town. At this time he had but a small estate, and was
in no way prominent ; but afterward he became one of
the leading men in the colony.
Robert Seeley, the next grantee, sold, in 1646, "his
house and house-lot '* to John Basset, with two acres of
upland out of his first division, and afterward resided
on the west side of West Creek, as appears from a deed
of gift which he made of " his dwelling-house with his
orchard ** to his son Nathaniel. He had removed from
Watertown, now called Cambridge, Mass., with the first
planters of Connecticut, and had been Capt. Mason's
lieutenant in the attack on the Pequot fort at Mystic.
Removing again, he came to Quinnipiac before its plant-
ers had established their fundamental agreement, and
was admitted a freeman on the day the court was organ-
ized. He was by trade a shoemaker ; but being marshal
of the court, lieutenant of the train-band, and captain
of the artillery company, much of his time was employed
in public affairs. In the autumn of 1646, about the time
he sold his house in Mr. Lamberton's quarter, he had
" liberty of the court to go for England, although a pub-
lic officer." It appears, however, that he did not imme-
diately use his liberty, for he was here in the following
February. In 1649 he was minded to remove from the
town, and offered his resignation ; but the court refused
to receive it as long as he remained, and " the four ser-
geants were desired to take some pains to see what men
would underwrite" for the encouragement of Lieut.
Seeley to remain. At a subsequent meeting, the ser-
geants having accomplished but little, sixteen or seven-
teen pounds were pledged by those present, and " the
sergeants were desired to speak with those that are
^
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 1 33
not present, to see what they will do." In 1659 ^tp-
pears the alienation of another house, after which his
name disappears for a time from the records, as if he
were absent. In 1662 he had " returned from Eng-
land ; " and " a motion was made in his behalf for some
encouragement for his settling among us," which, how-
ever, was ineffectual.
Roger Ailing came to New Haven with Capt. Lam-
berton, acting as steward during the last half of the
voyage, the former steward having died. Judging from
the wages allowed, viz., five pounds ten shillings for
the whole voyage, one would conclude that the vessel
came from a greater distance than the Bay. He was at
this time unmarried, and of small estate. At an early
date he became a member of the church and of the
court. In 1 66 1 he was chosen treasurer of the jurisdic-
tion, and afterward a deacon of the church.
John Brockett was also, in 1643, unmarried, and of
even smaller estate than his neighbor, Roger Ailing.
Like him he early became a member of the church and
of the court. He was much employed by the court, as
well as by individuals, in his profession as a surveyor.
Mr. Hickock's lot probably lay next to that of
Brockett. Mr. Crane, his agent, surrendered it to the
town in 1641, the proprietor having relinquished his
intention of coming here to reside.
John Budd, the next proprietor, signed the funda-
mental agreement before it was copied into the book,
and remained here till he removed, about 1646, to
Southold, L.I., where he acted a more prominent part
than at New Haven. Soon after his removal he was
appointed a lieutenant, and afterwards represented his
134 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
town in the General Court of the Jurisdiction. During
his absence in England another person was allowed
and desired to exercise the company ; the General Court
" understanding that he is a member of the church of
Salem, and, had he letters of recommendation, might be
admitted a freeman as others are." But he must take
the oath of fidelity to the jurisdiction : otherwise the
command must vest in the corporal of the company.
Mr. Budd sold his house and lot, in New Haven, for a
hogshead of sugar.
William Jeanes, who lived at the comer of Church
and Chapel Streets, had been one of the first planters,
but was not admitted a freeman till 1648. He sold this
corner-lot the same year to John Meggs.' Some years
afterward he was at Northampton, whence he removed
to Northfield with its first planters, and, though not an
ordained minister, conducted the first public Christian
worship in that town, preaching under an oak-tree.
Nicholas Elsey, who received his allotment on Chapel
Street, adjoining that of Mr. Jeanes, was a cooper by
trade. He was present at the ratification of the funda-
mental agreement in Mr. Newman's barn, and a few
years afterward was admitted a freeman.
Richard Hull, who lived on Chapel Street, between
Nich9las Elsey and William Preston, signed the funda-
mental agreement at the time when it was established,
and at the first meeting of the court was admitted a
' Sec History of the Cutler Comer, by Henry White, in N. H. Col.
Hist. Soc Coll., vol. i. Mr. White illustrates the relative inferiority in
early times of that part of Chapel Street which lies between Church
Street and State Street, by a quotation from the records in which it is
called " the lane that leadeth to Zuriel Kimberley's house.**
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION. 1 35
freeman, as a member of some other church than that
of New Haven.
Commencing the survey of the south-centre square,
we find at its north-east corner, where the glebe build-
ing now is, the house of Thomas Gregson. President
Stiles records the tradition that Gregson's house was
one of four which excelled in stateliness all other houses
erected in New Haven by the first generation of its
inhabitants ; the three which he groups with Gregson's
belonging respectively to Mr. Theophilus Eaton, Mr.
John Davenport, and Mr. Isaac AUerton.' Gregson
was one of the most honored men in the community,
intrusted with office continuously from 1640 till he
embarked in 1646, with a commission from the Colony
of New Haven to obtain, if possible, a charter from
Parliament. Having been a merchant in London, he
engaged in commerce after his arrival at Quinnipiac ;
and the voyage in which he lost his life was primarily
undertaken for commercial ends.
Next west of Mr. Gregson lived Stephen Goodyear,
another of the London merchants originally associated
together for the commencement of a plantation in New
England. Here he was engaged in foreign commerce,
sometimes in company with Eaton, Malbon, and Greg-
son, and sometimes adventuring largely on his mdivid-
' As Isaac Allerton was not here at the time of which we are discours-
ing, it may be appropriate to say that he was one of the voyagers in the
Mayflower, and, that having fallen under censure at Plymouth, on account
of some commercial transactions in which he was the agent of the colony,
he removed first to Marblehead, then a part of Salem, and afterward to
New Haven*. A lot was granted him on the east side of Union Street,
near Fair Street, where he built a " grand house with four porches.*'
136 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
ual responsibility. Having lost his first wife in Lam-
berton's ship, he married the widow of Lamberton, thus
uniting two families in one home with advantage to the
children of each. Second only to Eaton in the colonial
government, his absence in England when Eaton died
was a sufficient reason why he was not then advanced
to the chief magistracy ; and his death in London not
long afterward brought his useful and honorable career
to an end.
The lot next west of that occupied by Mr. Goodyear
extended to College Street, and had been assigned to
Mr. Hawkins, one of the non-resident proprietors. He
seems to have been a friend of Mr. Goodyear, into whose
possession the land afterward passed when its first pro-
prietor had relinquished his intention of residing in New
Haven.
Fronting on College Street was a lot assigned to
Samuel Bailey, who did not long remain in New Haven.
His allotment was purchased by William Davis.
Fronting on George Street were six lots belonging
to Thomas Buckingham, Thomas Welch, Jeremiah
Whitnell, Richard Miles, Nathanael Axtell, and Henry
Stonhill, respectively. Axtell, "intending to go home,
died in a few weeks before embarking, at Boston." Of
the remaining five, four, namely, Buckingham, Welch,
Miles, and Stonhill, removed to Milford with the first
planters of that town, leaving only Whitnell on that
side of the square. Deacon Richard Miles, however,
returned to New Haven in 1641.
According to the schedule of 1641, the proprietors
of the south-west square were, at that time, William
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 1 3/
Fowler, Peter Prudden, James Prudden, Edmond Tapp,
Widow Bal;lwin, An Elder, Richard Piatt, Zachariah
Whitman, and Thomas Osborne. The town records
show that the lot reserved for an elder had been origi-
nally assigned to Timothy Baldwin, who, removing to
Milford, sold his allotment to the town. As no land
within this square has been traced to Thomas Osborne,
it may be inferred that he sold to Mr. Fowler at an
early date, and before a record of alienation was re-
quired. Mr. Osborne owned and occupied a house and
tanyard on the south side of George Street, between
Broad and Factory Streets, doubtless preferring this
location to his original allotment because of the facili-
ties it afforded for his vocation as a tanner. He after-
ward became one of the first planters of Easthampton
on Long Island ; but this property, being given to one
of his sons, remained in the name of Osborne far into
the nineteenth century. With the exception of Os-
borne, the original grantees of this square removed to
Milford. As they had all emigrated from Hereford-
shire, or its vicinity, the square was for some years
designated as the Herefordshire quarter.
The square next north of that occupied exclusively
by Prudden and his friends from Hereford, had been
assigned for the most part, if not wholly, to the York-
shiremen who came with Ezekiel Rogers.
At the corner of Chapel and York Streets, a lot sur-
rendered by Francis Parrot, one of the Yorkshiremen
who returned to Massachusetts and settled at Rowley,
was assigned by •vote of the town, Nov. 3, 1639, ^^
Thomas James, who, having been pastor of the church
138 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
in Charlestown, Mass., had resigned his charge and
come hither to reside. In 1642, in respoi^ to a call
from Virginia for ministers from New England, Mr.
James went with two of his clerical brethren to Vir-
ginia. The mission was unsuccessful, not however for
want of "loving and liberal entertainment," but because
the colonial government would not allow them to remain
unless they woiild conform to the Church of England.
Mr. James afterward returned to the mother-country,
and was a beneficed clergyman in Needham, County of
Suffolk, till ejected in 1662 by the Act of Uniformity.
Widow Greene, who owned the lot on York Street,
next north of the corner-lot of Mr. James, probably did
not long remain at New Haven, as the name does not
continue to appear on the records.
Thomas Yale, step-son of Gov. Eaton, owned the
next lot, but probably never lived on it. Marrying a
daughter of Capt. Turner, he engaged in husbandry, and
appears to have made his home at a farm some miles
north of the town-plot.'
Thomas Fugill, a Yorkshireman, and, as we learn from
the autobiography of Rev. Thomas Shepard, a member,
before his emigration, of the family of Sir Richard
Darley at Buttercrambe, was one of the seven men
selected by the planters of New Haven for their
"foundation work." He was also "notary public," or
secretary of the plantation, and when a colonial govern-
ment was instituted by the union of New Haven, Mil-
' Thomas Yale has usually been reputed to be the father of Elihu
Yale, the benefactor of Yale College ; but Professor Dexter has conclu-
sively proved that Elihu Yale was son of David Yale, a brother of
Thomas.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 1 39
ford, and Guilford, was appointed secretary of the juris-
diction. He wrote a neat, legible hand, and so far forth
performed the work of his office well ; but the town, be-
coixiing suspicious of the records, appointed a committee
" to view all those orders which are of a lasting nature,
and where they are defective, to mend them and then
let them be read in the court that the court may con-
firm or alter them as they see cause." The summary
thus prepared is on record in the book kept by Fugill.
Meanwhile another committee was investigating the
result of a false entry by means of which Fugill had pos-
sessed himself of fifty-two acres and thirteen rods in
the second division of lands, "instead of twenty-four
acres, his full proportion." When this committee re-
ported, " some of the court and town propounded
whether it were not requisite and necessary to choose
another secretary, who might more faithfully enter and
keep the town's records. The secretary confessed his
unfitness for the place by reason of a low voice, a dull
ear, and slow apprehensions. He was answered, the
court had long taken notice of sundry miscarriages
through weakness or neglect, yet in tender respect to
himself and his family, they had continued him in the
place (though with trouble to others) ; a review of or-
ders, before these offences brake out, being upon that
consideration thought necessary and ordered. But upon
this discovery of unfaithfulness and falsifying of orders
and records, they were called to lay aside those private
respects for the public safety. By the court, therefore
he was presently put out of his office of secretary for
this plantation." Unable to sustain himself under the
weight of this punishment and of the censure of the
I40 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
church which followed it, he sold his estate, left
the town, and probably returned to England.
John Punderson, another of the Yorkshire company,
and also one of the seven chosen for " foundation work,"
was Fugill's nearest neighbor on the north. Few men
of that generation were so faithful in all public duties
as entirely to avoid pecuniary mulct ; but there is no
record of a fine imposed on John Punderson. A son
and a grandson, both bearing the name of John, were
deacons in the church which he helped to institute.
Another grandson. Rev. Ebenezer Punderson, was one
of the fathers of the Episcopal Church in Connecticut.
On the comer of York and Elm Streets lived John
Johnson, also of the Yorkshire company, who after a
few years removed to Rowley, selling his house to his
brother Robert, from whom was descended Rev. Samuel
Johnson, two years younger than Ebenezer Punderson,
but earlier than he in the ministry of the Episcopal
Church.
Corporal Abraham Bell lived on Elm Street, next east
from Mr. Johnson's corner. In 1647 he sold his estate
in New Haven to Job Hall, and removed to Charles-
town, Mass.
John Evance, who had been a London merchant and
a parishioner of Mr. Davenport at St. Stephen's, had a
large lot on the corner of Elm and College Streets, part
of it being held by him for his brother-in-law, Mr.
Mayer, who had not yet emigrated, and, as it proved,
never came. Mr. Evance, though less active and con-
spicuous in civil affairs than some others, was inferior
to few or none in commercial enterprise, drawing bills
of exchange on Mr. Eldred for beaver and hides shipped
THE PERSOAWEL OF THE PLANTATION. I4I
to London, and sending shingles and clapboards to Bar-
badoes in vessels to be freighted with sugar in return.
The lot on College Street, next south of that occu-
pied by Mr. Evance, was owned by a widow bearing the
Yorkshire name of Constable. The question has been
raised, whether the husband of this woman were the Sir
William Constable, who, according to Mather, proposed
to follow Ezekiel Rogers to New England. This woman
was plainly a widow, but not the widow of Sir William.
Her husband was styled Mr. ; her estate was small ;
she emigrated apparently as early as Rogers, and prob-
ably in his company ; while Sir William did not sail
with Rogers, and could not have come afterward with-
out impressing on the page of history some notice of
his arrival. Both the name and the location of this
family suggest that they belonged to Rogers's com-
pany, and they may have been related to the knight
who bore their family name. Mrs. Constable after-
ward became the wife of Deacon Richard Miles.
On the comer of College and Chapel Streets lived
Joshua Atwater. He was born at Lenham, County of
Kent, where he was baptized June 2, 161 2. Having
been a merchant in Ashford, in the same county, he
emigrated in the company of Davenport and Eaton,
and engaged in mercantile pursuits, first at New
Haven, then at Milford, and afterward at Boston,
where he died in 1676. He was treasurer of the juris-
diction till he removed out of its bounds.
The lot on Chapel Street, next west of Mr. Atwater's,
was assigned to John Cockerill, probably a Yorkshire-
man, who built a house thereon, but shortly after re-
roovedy leaving his house and lands in charge of Thomas
142 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Fugill. The estate stands in the name of Fugill in the
schedule ; but when after Fugill's departure the fences
decayed, and the rates remained unpaid, it was ascer-
tained that Cockerill had never alienated and still
claimed it. Allen Ball, a brother-in-law of Fugill, and
perhaps also related to Cockerill, was requested by the
town to "take the house and land and improve them
for defraying charges of rates and fencings ; " but he
declined, saying that " the house was uncomfortable to
live in." A curious record in regard to this property
was made more than sixty years after Cockerill left it
in the hands of Fugill ; viz., —
"June 20, 1 710. Capt Nathan Andrews and Mr. John Todd,
both of New Haven, testify and say that upon their certain knowl-
edge, they formerly knew one Mr. John Fugill to be at New Haven
above forty years since, who was reputed to be the son of Mr.
Thomas Fugill formerly of New Haven, and that he did not, as
they know of, lay any claim to the land in New Haven that was
his father's."
Edward Wigglesworth, whose tombstone, marked E.
W. 1653, was for a time supposed to distinguish the
grave of Edward Whalley, one of the regicide judges,
lived on the lot next west of Mr. Cockeriirs. An auto-
biographical paper by his son, Rev. Michael Wiggles-
worth, printed in the appendix to this volume, gives a
more distinct view of Quinnipiac and of one of its fami-
lies than any other single document.
Thomas Powell lived to old age on the only remain-
ing lot in the Yorkshire quarter.
Commencing the survey of the north-west square at
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION I43
its north-west corner, we find the comer occupied by
Edward Tench,, whose name was at first given to the
quarter. He died in February, i6|^. His wife, of
whom he speaks in his will as " lying in the house with
me, dangerously sick and near to death by a consump-
tion, so that in the judgment of man she draweth near
her change," probably survived him for some time, as
his will was presented to the court nearly seven years
afterward.
The lot on Grove Street, next east from Mr. Tench's
comer, still remained, when the schedule was written,
in the name of Mrs. Higginson, though that lady had
died a few weeks before her neighbor Mr. Tench. She
was the widow of Rev. Francis Higginson, the first
minister of Salem, and probably a kinswoman of the
Eatons, as the names Theophilus and Samuel had been
given to two of her children, and one of the children
was taken by the governor into his family after the
death of Mrs. Higginson. In the settlement of the
estate, no mention is made of any house on the home-
lot ; but in 1647 Theophilus Higginson sold to "Chris-
topher Todd his house and home-lot in New Haven
lying betwixt the lot now William Judson's and Mr.
Tench's.*' The inference is, that when Mrs. Higgin-
son died, the family were still occupying a temporary
habitation.
Henry Browning lived on the corner of Grove and
College Streets. He does not appear to have been a
freeman. In 1647 he "sold to Goodman William Jud-
son all his real estate and commonage, together with a
bedstead and trundle-bed, a pair of valance and a piece
of blue darnix, a malt mill, a well bucket and chain, two
144 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
loads of clay brought home, and the fence about the lot
repaired." His name does not occur afterward on the
records.
Francis Newman, the owner of the next lot, was ad-
mitted a freeman in 1640, chosen ensign of the train-
band in 1642, lieutenant of the artillery-company upon
its formation in 1645, secretary of the plantation in
1647, and was finally advanced to the highest office in
the jurisdiction, being chosen governor after Eaton's
death.
John Caffinch, whose lot lay next south of Francis
Newman's, probably sailed direct from England to
Quinnipiac, arriving in 1639 with the first planters of
Guilford, though not in the same ship with Whitfield.
He was one of the six principal men chosen to re-
ceive from the aboriginal proprietors of Guilford a
deed in trust for the whole company of planters. For
some reason he concluded to live at New Haven rather
than at Guilford. He does not appear to have been
a freeman.
David Atwater, a younger brother of Joshua Atwater,
had a lot adjoining that of Mr. Caffinch, but never
lived on it. He seems to have become a proprietor at
a late date, and to have received his whole allotment,
with the exception of this town-lot, in the third divis-
ion. It is conjectured, that, before he became a pro-
prietor at New Haven, he may have had some thought
of joining the Kentish colony at Guilford. His resi-
dence in New Haven was at his farm between East
Rock and Quinnipiac River, where his neighbors were
Capt. Turner, Richard Mansfield, and William Potter.
His town-lot had been previously assigned to John
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 1 45
Pocock, who became one of the first* planters of Mil-
ford. Mr. Atwater died in 1692, having outlived most
of the first planters.
Two lots, extending from Mr. Atwater's to the cor-
ner of College and Elm Streets, were reserved for non-
residents named respectively Dearmer and Lucas.
On Elm Street, between Mr. Lucas's comer and the
comer of Elm and York Streets, lived Andrew Low,
widow Williams, Robert Hill, and William Thorpe.
On York Street, between Mr. Thorpe's corner and
Mr. Tench's comer, was a lot belonging to Jeremiah
Dixon, one of the seven men chosen for foundation
work. He early removed from the plantation ; and, as
he was unmarried, there was probably no house upon
his lot.
The only remaining square of the eight which sur-
rounded the market-place was occupied on Elm Street
by the lots of two non-residents, Mr. Marshall and Mrs.
Eldred, and by the lot of Francis Brewster. Mr. Mar-
shall has already been mentioned in connection ^ith
Richard Mansfield, who was his representative and
agent. Mrs. Eldred was apparently a widow in Lon-
don, and perhaps the mother of a Mr. Eldred with
whom some of the colonists had commercial corre-
spondence. As the name occurs on the parish-register
of St. Stephen's, it may be that the family had been
parishioners of Mr. Davenport in Coleman Street.
Francis Brewster was from London, and one of the
company which came with Davenport. He does not
appear to have been a freeman. Mr. Brewster having
been lost in Lamberton's ship, and his widow having
146 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
married Mr. PeH and removed to New Jersey, the
house and home-lot were sold to Mr. Goodenhouse, a
Dutchman, who had married the widow of Capt.
Turner.
Mark Pearce, whose lot was on College Street north
of Brewster's comer, had lived at Cambridge, Mass.,
and removed to New Haven as late as 1642. At a
general court held Feb. 24, 164I, "Mr. Pearce desired
the plantation to take notice, that if any will send
their children to him he will instruct them in writing
or arithmetic." This was several years before Mr.
Cheever removed, so that Mr. Pearce's school, if his
o£Eer was accepted, must have been additional to that
of Cheever.
Jarvis Boykin, a carpenter by trade, was the next
proprietor on College Street. He came from the town
of Charing in Kent, and hstd resided two or three years
in Charlestown, Mass., before he joined the company
which settled at Quinnipiac.
Benjamin Ling occupied the comer of College and
Grove Streets. He had removed from Charlestown,
Mass., and was present at the formation of the funda-
mental agreement in 1639. He died in 1673, com-
mending his wife to the care of James Davids, who for
some years had been an inmate of his house. Mr.
Davids married the widow, who, dying not long after
the marriage, left the homestead to him. It was
known to some of the inhabitants of New Haven that
James Davids was an alias for John Dixwell, and that
this man was one of the regicide judges. Marrying a
second wife, he became the father of a family, and
resided here many years, not only unbetrayed, but
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 1 47
'tnuch revered and beloved Here he died in old age ;
^d his grave on the green is marked, not only by the
Tude stone bearing his initials which his contempora-
ries placed there, but by a marble monument erected
in later times.
On Grove Street, next east from Mr. Ling's corner,
was the lot of Robert Newman. In his barn was held
the meeting of planters at which the fundamental
agreement was adopted, Mr. Newman himself being
the secretary of the meeting. He was elected ruling
elder of the church, and continued in that office till his
return to England. The latest mention of him as
a resident of New Haven is on the eighth day of Octo-
ber, 1649.
On the east side of Elder Newman's lot was the lot
of William Andrews, a member of the cKurch and of
the court from the first. He was a carpenter by trade,
but found time to keep "an ordinary" or house of
entertainment for strangers.
John Cooper lived at the corner of Grove and
Church Streets. He was present at the adoption of
the fundamental agreement, and became a freeman in
October, 1645, his name being the last but one on the
list made by Secretary Fugill. "John Cooper took oath
to be faithful to the trust committed to him in view-
ing fences and pounding cattle, according to the court's
order, without partiality or respect of persons." In the
execution of this trust, he was to inspect all the fences
within the two miles " once every week if no extraordi-
nary providence hinder."
Sergeant Richard Beckley, whose lot lay between
. that of Mr. Cooper and that of Mr. Marshall, was pres-
148 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
ent when the fundamental agreement was adopted, and,
as his military title implies, was a member of the court.
Having now surveyed the eight squares which lay
around the market-place, let us proceed to the two
suburbs, and first to that which lay between the two
creeks.
Sergeant Samuel Whitehead lived at the corner of
George and Meadow Streets. Previous to his residence
in New Haven, he had spent some years in Massachu-
setts and at Hartford. By the marriage of his grand-
daughter his homestead passed into the family of Hub-
bard, and so continued for nearly two centuries.
John Clark, who lived on Meadow Street next south
of Mr. Whitehead, was interpreter when the Montowese
Indians sold their land to the. English. He had lived
about four years in Massachusetts before he came to
Quinnipiac with its first planters.
Of Luke Atkinson, the next proprietor on Meadow
Street, little is known but that he dared to quarrel with
Mr. Davenport, and, . being charged with slander, was
fined forty pounds. He removed from New Haven in
1656.
Edward Banister died in 1649, and his lot passed into
other hands. Another lot which lay between State
Street and the East Creek was granted to his widow
by the town, on which she built a house.
John Moss, though by no means a wealthy man, gave
his son Joseph a liberal education, and had the pleasure
of seeing him settled in the ministry at Derby. In his
old age John Moss removed to Wallingford, where he
died in 1707, aged one hundred and three years.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION, I49
John Charles, a brother-in-law of John Moss, had
lived some years in Massachusetts. He was a sea-
faring man, and removed first to Branford and after-
ward to Saybrook.
Richard Beach removed to* New London.
Arthur Halbidge came from England to Boston in
1635. He died in 1648.
William Peck crossed the Atlantic with Davenport
and Elaton. He is said to have been a merchant in
London ; but the tradition is not easily reconciled
with his estimate of his estate, which he put into the
list at twelve pounds. Though not wealthy, he was
much respected in the plantation, as appears from his
election as a deacon of the church.
Timothy Ford, whose lot was at the corner of Mead-
ow and Water Streets, had lived in Massachusetts.
Peter Brown, at a court holden Feb. 5, i6|^, was
"licensed to bake to sell, so long as he gives no offence
in it justly." He afterward removed to Stamford.
Daniel Paul, whose lot was at the corner of Water
and State Streets, soon disappeared from the planta-
tion ; and his lot came into the possession of William
Westerhouse, a Dutch merchant. July 3, 1655, John
Thompson "bought, at an outcry, the house and lot, and
lands which belong to it, which was Mr. Westerhouse's,
for .£40.05, which was thus sold by order of the court.**
About a month afterward the purchaser sold to John
Hodson "the house he bought of the court, which was
Mr. Westerhouse's, and the land which belongs to it,
and Mr. Hodson is to pay the court for it, £40.05."
John Livermore, who lived on State Street, next
north of Goodman Paul's corner, came to Massachu-
I50 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
setts from Ipswich, England, in 1634. He signed the
fundamental agreement after it had been copied into
the record-book.
Henry Rutherford died in 1668 : his widow married
William Leete, Governor of the Colony of New Haven
and afterwards Governor of the Colony of Connecticut.
Thomas Trowbridge was from Taunton or its vicinity,
in *the county of Somerset. He was a merchant, trad-
ing to Barbadoes.
The lots of widow Potter atld John Potter passed at
an early date into the possession of Allen Ball, though
there is no record of the transfer.
Passing now to the suburb on the west side of West
Creek, we find, on the comer made by the streets now
named Hill Street and Congress Avenue, the lot of
William Ives. He died in 1648, leaving a wife and
four children. William Basset married the widow ; and
the family continued to reside in the house till it was
sold, in 1652, to the widow of Anthony Thompson.
The next lot fronting on Hill Street was assigned to
George Smith, who in 1655 sold his house and home-
lot to Timothy Ford. He describes the premises as
lying between the house that was Matthew Canfield's
and that which was William Ives's.
The lot thus described as having belonged to Mat-
thew Canfield must have been, if the order of the sched-
ule is to be followed, the property of widow Sherman
before Matthew Canfield acquired it. "An inventory
and will of old father Sherman was delivered into the
court " in May, 1641, and soon afterward the name of
(Campfield) Canfield first appears.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION 151
These three are all of the lots in the suburb on the
west side of the West Creek that can be located. The
other proprietors in this suburb were Matthew Moul-
throp, Anthony Thompson, John Reeder, Robert Cogs-
well, Matthias Hitchcock, ' Francis Hall, Richard Os-
borne, William Potter, James Clark, Edward Patteson,
and Andrew Hull.
As the schedule assigns nothing to Matthew Moul-
throp, it is doubtful whether he ever acquired a complete
title to a lot in this quarter.
Anthony Thompson died about ten years after the
first settlement of the town. His widow married Nich-
olas Camp of Milford. As one of his two brothers was
childless, and the other had only daughters, he is proba-
bly the ancestor of all, or nearly all, in New Haven who
bear the name of Thompson.*
The name of John Reeder is not found in any record
later than the schedule of 1641. The name of Robert
Cogswell disappears about the same time. At that
early day alienations were not always recorded ; and,
unless it has escaped a very close scrutiny, there is no
record of the sale of their lots by these two proprie-
tors.
The names of Matthias Hitchcock, Francis Hall, and
Richard Osborne follow next in the schedule. They
all remained long in the town, and probably died here.
" Matthias Hitchcock passeth over to John Wakefield
his house and home-lot on the other side of the West
* There was another Thompson at Fairfield, contemporary with An-
thony of New Haven. Possibly, from that source or some other, Thomp-
sons may have removed to New Haven, and become undistinguishably
mixed with the descendants of Anthony.
152 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Creek," Feb. 6, 1655. Richard Osborne was a tanner
by trade, and the coincidence of name and occupa-
tion suggests that he was a brother of Thomas Os-
borne.
William Potter removed from his town-lot, if he ever
built a house on it, to his farm on the west side of
Quinnipiac River. After having been for many years a
church-member, he was accused of bestiality, and upon
his own confession was condemned to death and exe-
cuted.
James Clark removed to the north part of the town,
and afterward to Stratford.
The name of Edward Patteson does not occur after
1646.
Andrew Hull died in 1643, and his widow became
the wife of Richard Beach.
Besides the home-lots assigned to proprietors, thirty-
two "small lots" had been freely given to as many
householders, before the second division of out-lands
was made. The records furnish a list of these house-
holders having no right of commonage, in the order
in which they were drawn by lot for the choice of the
out-lands allowed them in the second division. Seven
of them dwelt on "the bank-side," that is, on East
Water Street and east of the four proprietors whose
land extended from Union Street to Chestnut Street ;
the other twenty-five had their homes between George
Street and the West Creek. The seven on the bank-
side were William Russell, Francis Brown, Thomas
Morris, Nathaniel Merriman, Robert Pigg, Thomas
Beamont, and William Gibbons.
THE PERSONNEL OF THE PLANTATION. 1 53
The whole catalogue reads thus, viz., —
1. Stephen MetcalL 17. Francis Brown.
2. Adam Nicolls. George Larrymore.
3. Nathaniel Merriman. Thomas Beamont
4. John Thompson. Thomas Leaver.
5. Brother Kimberly's brother. John Vincent
d. John Nash. John Hall.
7. Mrs. Swinerton. William Russell.
8. Goodman Davis. Christopher Todd.
^ Richard Newman. Thomas Munson.
Thomas Mitchel. Benjamin Wilmot
Thomas Morris. John Walker.
Goodman Peck. Benjamin Pauling.
Another lot. A brickmaker.
Goodman Hames. Obadiah Barnes.
Goodman Dayton. Elizabeth, the washer.
Goodman Pigg. William Gibbons.
In estimating the population of New Haven at this
period, one must take into account not only proprietors
and householders, but indentured and hired servants.
The records show that both these classes were numer-
ous. The families of the proprietors contained four
hundred and twenty souls, counting only their wives and
children with themselves. Deducting those who never
left England, and those who removed to Milford, and
adding the families to which lots had been freely given,
we have by equal ratio a population of about four hun-
dred and sixty. But the houses of the Milford people
were not all empty. Some of them were hired and
occupied by persons who did not care to become pro-
prietors. The number of dependents of one kind and
another attached to all these families must have nearly
154 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
equalled, and perhaps it exceeded, the census returned
by the proprietors. Gov. Eaton returns only six ; but
his family is said to have contained thirty persons. In
no other family was there so large a proportion of
ser\'ants ; but there was scarcely a householder whose
family was limited to himself, his wife, and his children.
Artisans and farmers had young men and boys in their
employ, and maid-servants were to be found in almost
every household.
If on the basis of these facts we estimate the whole
number of souls in the plantation at eight hundred, con-
firmation of such an estimate is found in the military
census, which after the elders, deacons, magistrates,
deputies, physicians, military officers of a higher grade
than sergeants, the schoolmaster, the miller, and mas-
ters of vessels carrying more than fifteen tons were
exempted, provided thirty-one watches, each consisting
of seven men, out of the male population between six-
teen and sixty years of age. If there were two hun-
dred and seventeen men liable to this duty, and thirty
more who were exempt, the entire population could not
have been much less than eight hundred'
' The Dutch authorities at New Amsterdam reported to their supe-
riors in Holland that Rodenbergh, or New Haven, contained, eleven years
after it was founded, about 1,340 families. But, though affirmed of New
Haven tov^ii, it must have been, I think, their informant's estimate of the
population of the colony.
I
I
1
I
i
\
«.^,
* .1
. 'I .
ff
».*
%• . •
<*»
'^ ,
» *
»»
^•-'
i, ••■,♦*» J. wn"
c
CHAPTER IX.
MILFORD. — GUILFORD. — SOUTHOLD. — STABfFORD.
BENJAMIN FENN, Thomas Buckingham, Thomas
Welch, Richard Miles, Henry Stonhill, William
Fowler, Peter Prudden, James Prudden, Edmund Tapp,
Timothy Baldwin, Richard Piatt, and Zachariah Whit-
man were mentioned in the last chapter as having re-
moved to Milford. Other persons from New Haven
who engaged with them in commencing a new planta-
tion were John Pocock, Thomas Tibbals, John Fowler,
Richard Baldwin, Nathanael Baldwin, Joseph Baldwin,
and John Baldwin. The four last named were perhaps
sons of the widow Baldwin, who was one of the pro-
prietors in the Herefordshire quarter at New Haven.
To these was added a company from Wethersfield, who,
with perhaps a few from other places, increased the
number of planters commencing the settlement at
Milford to fifty-four.
Before their removal to Milford, a church had been
organized by them at New Haven on the twenty-second
day of August, 1639, the day when the New Haven
church was constituted, or, as Mather reports it, one day
later. The same method of organization was adopted
by the people who were to remove to Milford as by
their brethren who were to remain at New Haven.
«55
156 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
They chose seven men for the foundation, and these
admitted others. The names of the seven were Peter
Prudden, William Fowler, Edmund Tapp, Zachariah
Whitman, John Astwood, Thomas Buckingham, and
Thomas Welch. Six of them had been resident at
New Haven ; and one, viz., John Astwood, had resided
at Wethersfield.
The town records begin with a list of forty-four per-
sons " allowed to be free planters, having for the pres-
ent, liberty to act in the choice of public officers for
carrying on of public affairs in this plantation." The
list was prepared in accordance with an order passed
at the first general court of the planters held in Mil-
ford on the 20th of November, 1639, at which it was
"voted and agreed that the power of electing officers
and persons to divide the land into lots, to take order
for the timber, and to manage the common interests
of the plantation, should be in the church only, and
that the persons so chosen should be only from among
themselves."
At the same court other orders were passed, as fol-
lows : viz., —
That they would guide themselves in all their do-
ings by the written word of God, till such time as a
body of laws should be established ;
That five men should be chosen for judges in all
civil affairs, to try all causes between man and man,
and as a court to punish any offence and misdemeanor ;
That the persons invested with the magistracy
should have power to call a general court whenever
they might see cause, or the public good require ;
That they should hold particular courts once in six
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD. 1 57
weeks, wherein should be tried such causes as might be
brought before them, they to examine witnesses upon
oath as need should require ;
That, according to the sum of money which each
person paid toward the public charges, in such propor-
tion should he receive or be repaid in lands, and that
all planters who might ^^.x^^ come after should pay
their share equally for \ \^ \ some other public use ;
That the town seal \ / should be the letters
M and F joined thus : >/
The court then proceeded to choose for judges, Wil-
liam Fowler, Edmund Tapp, Zachariah Whitman, John
Astwood, and Richard Miles, to continue in office till
the next court of election, to be holden the first week
in October.
It appears from this action taken at their first general
court, that the planters of Milford, like those of New
Haven, allowed the right of suffrage to church-mem-
bers only, and that forty-four of them out of fifty-four
were at first possessed of this qualification. This was
a much larger . proportion than at New Haven, where
a great majority of the planters not possessing this
qualification, though " having a purpose, resolution, and
desire that they may be admitted into church-fellow-
ship according to Christ as soon as God shall fit them
thereunto," voluntarily deprived themselves of the right
of suffrage till they should become thus qualified.
One might easily believe that Milford, where so great
a majority of the planters were church-members, would
adhere to the rule once established, longer than New
Haven ; but in truth Milford within three years, and
perhaps in much less time, admitted six of the ten who
158 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
had been excluded, to be free burgesses while they were
not church-members. On second thought one will con-
clude that the smallness of the minority was in itself
a reason why the rule was changed. Perhaps, when
four of the ten had become members of the church
and of the court, the absurdity of apprehending any
evil from the admission of the remaining six to equal
political rights was an irresistible appeal to the majority
to change the rule. There may have been less objec-
tion to the change for the reason that the rule was not,
as at New Haven, a fundamental law, but subject to
repeal by a majority of votes, like the common orders
of the court. Indeed, the heading of the list of the
forty-four reads as if there were some doubt at the time
whether the exclusion of the ten would be permanent
It is a list of persons " having for the present^ liberty
to act in the choice of public officers."
At the second general court, held March 9, 1640, " it
was agreed between William Fowler and the brethren
(the five judges), that he should build a mill, and have
her going by the last of September, when the town
were to take it off his hands, if they saw proper, for
one hundred and eighty pounds ; or else the brethren
were to appoint what toll he should take." "It was
( says Lambert ) the first mill erected in New Haven
colony." The high estimation in which it was held
by the planters is evident from the fact that when it
had been injured by a freshet, they voted in a general
court held in December, 1645, that all the town should
help Mr. Fowler repair the mill, and he was to call for
them, each man a day, till he should have gone through
the town, whenever he needed help. " If he went not
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, 159
through the town in one year, the same liberty was
granted till he had gone through."
Until this time the plantation had been called by
its Indian name of Wepowaug ; but at a general court
held Nov. 24, 1640, "with common consent and gen-
eral vote of the freemen, the plantation was named
Milford." The letters in the town seal indicate, how-
ever, that the name of Milford had been chosen at an
earlier date, and that this formal action wds taken for
the purpose of superseding the Indian name.
A record of home-lots was made in 1646, from which
a map of the town-plot can be drawn, showing the
names of all who were proprietors at that time, and the
relative position of their dwellings ; for as every planter
was required to erect a good house within three years,
or forfeit his lot, it may be presumed that nearly all to
whom home-lots were recorded in 1646 had complied
with this condition. The number of proprietors had
by this time increased to sixty-six. The map opposite
page 15s was enlarged from Lambert's History of the
Colony of New Haven. It exhibits the line of pali-
sades which enclosed the whole settlement, and the
arrangement of the home-lots on both sides of Mill
River and of West End Brook. A footway across the
field, such as is often seen in England, led from the
West End to the meeting-house, "the stiles to be
maintained by brother Nicholas Camp at the West
End and by brother Thomas Baker at the. meeting-
house (for the outside stiles) ; and for the inner fences,
each man shall maintain his stile in the most con-
venient place ; and the passage over Little Dreadful
Swamp in John Fletcher's lot, shall be by a long log
hewed on the upper side."
l6o HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
In the allotment of out-lands, a course was taken
similar to that taken at New Haven. "In the first
division abroad" a tract lying south of the* town and
east of Mill River was assigned to the planters whose
home-lots fronted on that river, and was called East-
field. Another tract west of the same river was al-
lotted to the planters whose houses fronted on West
End Brook, and was called Westfield. Each of these
fields, or quarters as they would have been called in
New Haven, being subdivided among the proprietors
according to the estates they had respectively reported
for taxation, was enclosed with a fence, to the expense
of which each proprietor contributed in proportion to
the number of tis acres. Meadow-land was also allot-
ted to each planter in proportion to his estate. Sev-
eral divisions of upland subsequently made, were con-
ducted according to the same rule.
We have already observed that a few families from
Kent, moved by the change which took place in eccle-
siastical administration when Laud succeeded Abbot,
had emigrated in the company of Mr. Davenport.
These were the earnest of a company from Kent, Sur-
rey, and Sussex, which came two years later, and settled
in Guilford. That the two companies were connected,
and that they were in communication after the arrival
of Mr. Davenport at Quinnipiac, appears from the fact
that Mr. Whitfield sailed direct for Quinnipiac, and
that Mr. Davenport's only child, whom his parents had
left behind on account of his tender years, came with
his nurse in the same ship, as also from the covenant
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, l6l
which Mr. Whitfield's company made and signed on
shipboard.' The covenant was as follows : —
" We, whose names are hereunder written, intending by God's
gracious permission to plant ourselves in New England, and, if it
may be, in the southerly part, about Quinnipiac : We do faithfully
promise each to each, for ourselves and families, and those that
belong to us; that we will, the Lord assisting us, sit down and
join ourselves together in one entire plantation ; and to be helpful
each to the other in every common work, according to every man's
ability and as need shall require ; and we promise not to desert or
leave each other or the plantation, but with the consent of the
rest or the greater part of the company who have entered into this
engagement.
" As for our gathering together in a church way, and the choice
of officers and members to be joined together in that way, we do
refer ourselves until such time as it shall please God to settle us
in our plantation.
" In witness whereof we subscribe our hands the first day of
June, 1639.
"Robert Kitchel. Wm. Dudley.
John Bishop. John Parmelin.
Francis Bushnell. ^ John Mepham.
William Chittenden. Henry Whitfield.
William Leete. Thomas Norton.
Thomas Jones. Abraham Cruttenden.
John Jordan. Francis Chatfield.
William Stone. William Hall.
John Hoadley. Thomas Nash.
John Stone. Henry Kingsnorth.
William Plane. Henry Dowd.
Richard Gutridge. Thomas Cook."
John Hughes.
The exact time when Mr. Whitfield and his fellow-
voyagers arrived in the harbor of Quinnipiac cannot be
' Inquiry for the autograph of this covenant has been unsuccessful.
1 62 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
ascertained ; but there is reason to believe they were
near the end of their voyage when they signed the
above agreement, three days previous to the meeting
of the New Haven planters in Mr. Newman's bam,
when permanent foundations of ecclesiastical and civil
order were laid. It is here given as found in the " His-
< tory of Guilford " by Ralph D. Smith. Under date of
"Quinnipiac, July 28, 1639/* Mr. Davenport writes to
his friend Lady Vere : —
•* Madam, — By the good hand of our God upon us, my dear
child is safely arrived with sundry desirable friends, as Mr. Fen-
wick and his lady, Mr. Whitfield, &c., to our great comfort.
"Their passage was so ordered, as it appeared that prayers
were accepted. For they had no sickness in the ship except a
little sea-sickness; not one died, but they brought to shore one
more than was known to be in the vessel at their coming forth, for
a woman was safely delivered of a child, and both were alive and
well. They attained to the haven where they would be, in seven
weeks. Theu* provisions at sea held good to the last About the
time when we guessed they might approach near us, we set a day
apart for public extraordinary Jjumiliation by fasting and prayer, in
which we commended them into the hands of our God whom winds
♦ and seas obey, and shortly after sent out a pinnace to pilot them to
our harbor : for it was the first ship that ever cast anchor in this
place. But our pilot, having waited for them a fortnight, grew
weary and returned home ; and the very next night after, the ship
came in, guided by God's own hand to .our town. The sight of the
harbor did so please the captain of the ship and all the passengers,
that he called it the Fair Haven. Since that, another ship hath
brought sundry passengers, and a third is expected daily."
It appears from this letter that Mr. Whitfield's com-
pany did not all come in one ship. The signers of the
agreement are twenty-five in number, of whom, one, and
perhaps two, did not settle at Guilford. Thomas Nash,
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, 163
being a smith competent to repair guns as well as to do
general work in the line of his trade, became a planter
at New Haven, and is third in the list of those who
signed the fundamental agreement after it was copied
into the record-book. The reasons why he should
reside in the larger plantation were so weighty that
his fellow-passengel's doubtless released him from his
agreement. The name of John Hughes not appearing
/ on the earliest record of planters at Guilford, it may be
conjectured that he died at an early date, or was diverted
from that to some other plantation.
As the first ship brought only twenty-three of the
first planters of Guilford, we must conclude that the
others arrived in the second or in the second and third
ships mentioned in Mr. Davenport's letter. If the first
ship arrived in June, the second early in July, and the
third ' ^oon after the date of the letter, we may conclude
that only preliminary steps were taken for selecting a
site previous to the arrival of the last division of their
company. Soon after all had arrived, a meeting was
held in Mr. Newman's barn, which is thus alluded to
in the " Guilford Book of the more fixed Orders for the
Plantation."
"January 31st 1649 (N. S. 1650).
" Upon a review of the more fixed agreements, laws and orders
formerly and from time to time made, The General Court here held
the day and year aforesaid thought fit, agreed and established them
' It is a reasonable conjectuie that the third ship brought the company
which settled Southold on Long Island. As the first vessel is known to
have brought about half of the Guilford families, the second would prob-
ably be sufficient for the transportation of the remainder. The third ves-
sel sufficiently accounts for the presence at New Haven of the Southold
Company, a problem which, so far as the writer is aware, no one has
attempted to solve.
/
\
\
164 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
according to the ensuing draft, as followeth, viz^ — first we do ac-
knowledge, ratify, confirm and allow the agreement made in Mr.
Newman^s bam » at Quillipeack, now called New Haven, that the
whole lands called Menunkatuck should be purchased for us and
our heirs, but the deed-writings thereabouts to be made and drawn
(from the Indians) in the name of these six planters in our steads,
viz., Henry Whitfield, Robert Kitchel, William Leete, William Chit-
tenden, John Bishop and John Cafidnge ; notwithstanding all and
every planter shall pay his proportionable part or share towards all
the charges and expenses for purchasing, selling, securing or carry-
ing on the necessary public affairs of this plantation according to
such rule and manner of rating as shall be from time to time
agreed on in this plantation.''
According to this agreement made in Mr. Newman's
bam, a purchase was made from Shaumpishuh, the
sachem squaw of Menunkatuck, which is defined in
the following deed : —
" Articles of agreement made and agreed on the 29th of September,
1639, between Henry Whitfield, Robert Kitchel, William Chit-
tenden, Wm. Leete, John Bishop and Jno. Caffinch, English
planters of Menunkatuck, and the sachem squaw of Menunka-
tuck together with the Indian inhabitants of Menunkatuck as
followeth :
" First, that the sachem squaw is the sole owner, possessor and
inheritor of all the lands lying between Ruttawoo and Ajicomick
river.
" Secondly, that the said sachem squaw with the consent of the
Indians there inhabiting (who are all, together with herself, to re-
move from thence) doth sell unto the foresaid English planters all
the lands lying within the aforesaid limits of Ruttawoo and Ajico-
mick river.
" Thirdly, that the said sachem squaw having received twelve
* This was a meeting of the newly arrived Guilford planters, and should
not be confounded with the earlier meeting of New Haven planters on the
fourth day of June.
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD. 16$
coatSy twelve fathom of wampum, twelve glasses, twelve pairs of
shoes, twelve hatchets, twelve pairs of stockings, twelve hoes,
four kettles, twelve knives, twelve hats, twelve porringers, twelve
spoons, two English coats, professeth herself to be fully paid and
satisfied."
,, , ,, ^ ( Sachem Squaw, her mark.
"John Higginsok J ^.^^^^^^^ \ ^^^^^ whitf.eld, in i)u
RoBT. Newman j \ ^ ^i. ^»
^ {^ name of the rest.
Additional territory was afterward purchased of other
Indians; but the aforesaid deed covers all the land
within the present limits of Guilford.
At the time when the deed was written, the pur-
chasers must have been already resident on the land
purchased, as they are described as " English planters of
Menunkatuck." Probably those who arrived in the first
ship had visited the place, and prepared the way by
negotiating with the Indians, so that, soon after the
others came to land, all went together to their new
home. If this be true, the deed was signed at Menunka-
tuck, though there is no proof of this in the writing
itself. The presence of John Higginson, one of the
witnesses, is worthy of notice. This young gentleman,
now in the twenty-fourth year of his age, may have
stopped at the new settlement merely for needful re-
freshment as he journeyed from Saybrook Fort, where
he was chaplain, to visit his mother at Quinnipiac.
But, if this was his first introduction to the planters
of Menunkatuck, we may conclude from his subsequent
history that he soon repeated his visit ; for within two
years he married a daughter of Mr. Whitfield, and fixed
his residence at Guilford.
^ Trumbull says of the founders of this plantation : —
i66
HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" As they were from Kent and Surrey, they took much pains to
find a tract of land resembling that from which they had removed.
They therefore finally pitched upon Guilford, which, toward the
sea, where they made the principal settlement, was low, moist, rich
land, liberal indeed to the husbandman, especially the great plain
south of the town. This had been already cleared and enriched by
the natives. The vast quantities of shells and manure, which in a
course of ages they had brought upon it from the sea, had con-
tributed much to the natural richness of the soil. There were also
nearly adjoining to this several necks, or points of land, near the
sea, clear, rich, and fertile, prepared for immediate improvement."
No list of planters is extant bearing an eariier date
than 1650. About that time a catalogue of the free-
men was recorded, to which were appended the names
of planters not yet admitted to the right of suffrage.
Two or three names of each of these classes appear to
have been added as late as 1652. The freemen of the
plantation were : —
Henry Whitfield.
Jno. Higginson.
George Hubbard.
Mr. Samuel Desborough.
Mr. Robert Kitchel.
Mr. Wm. Chittenden.
Mr. Wm. Leete.
Thomas Jordan.
John Hoadley.
John Scranton.
George Bartlett,
Jasper Stillwell.
Alexander Chalker.
John Stone.
Thomas Jones.
William Hall.
Thomas Betts.
John Parmelin, sen.
Henry Kingsnorth.
Thomas Cook.
Richard Bristow.
John Parmelin, Jr.
John Fowler.
Wm. Dudley.
Richard Gutridge.
Abraham Cruttenden, sen.
Edward Benton.
John Evarts.
The planters who had not been admitted as freemen
were :
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD. 167
John Bishop, sen.
Thomas Chatfield.
Francis Bushnell.
Henry Dowd.
Richard Hughes.
George Chatfield.
William Stone.
John Stevens.
Benjamin Wright.
John Linsley.
John Johnson.
John Sheader.
Samuel Blachley.
Thomas French.
Stephen Bishop.
Thomas Stevens.
William Bore man.
Edward Seward.
George Highland.
Abraham Cruttenden, Jr.
The planters of both these classes were at that
time forty-eight in number ; of whom four, namely, John
Higginson, George Hubbard, John Fowler, and Thomas
Betts, had not been of the company of original plant-
ers. Higginson came from Saybrook, where he had
been chaplain for four years ; and the three others re-
moved from Milford. But the plantation had lost as
many or more by removals from it as it had gained by
removals to it from other places ; and at least seven
proprietors are known to have died before 1650. We
have seen how Thomas Nash, who came in the same
ship with Whitfield, was detached from the company.
John Caffinge, or Caffinch, one of the six trustees for
purchasing and holding land, and the only one of them
who did not come in the same ship with Whitfield, be-
came a planter at New Haven within two or three
years after the deeds were signed in which he is
named as grantee. Thomas Relf and Thomas Dunk
had also removed. In the list of the dead were Thom-
as Norton, Thomas Mills, John Mepham, John Jordan,
William Somers, William Plane, and Francis Austin.
The catalogue of planters in 1650 doubtless contains
some names of young men, who, coming with their
1 68 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
parents in 1639, had since become proprietors. If
these amounted to seven, the number of planters in
1639 was the same as in 1650. Comparing Guilford
with other plantations in New England during these
eleven years, we must conclude that if it had neither
gained nor lost in population, it had been compara-
tively prosperous. England, which had sent so many
Puritans to America, was now governed by Puritans,
and emigration had consequently ceased. Many plan-
tations were losing from year to year more families by
the removal of those who were " going home " and by
deaths than they gained by marriages. The people of
Guilford, depending entirely on agriculture for subsist-
ence, and having abundance of fertile land, though
they suffered in the general depression, were not so
much impoverished as the merchants of New Haven.
From the commencement of the plantation till the
gathering of a church in 1643, the undivided lands were
held in trust by the six planters in whose name the
deed was originally taken. Four of the six were early
designated as a provisional committee in whom all
civil power was vested. At a meeting of the planters
held Feb. 2, 1642, it was "agreed that the civil power
for administration of justice and preservation of peace
shall remain in the hands of Robert Kitchel, William
Chittenden, John Bishop, and William Leete, formerly
chosen for that work, until some may be chosen out of
the church that shall be gathered here." Mr. Whit-
field was doubtless excused from acting in this provis-
ional magistracy on account of his pastoral relation,
and Mr. CaflSnch had removed to New Haven. When
the church had been formed, civil government was
MILFORDy GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, 169
instituted by the members of it ; and the record of its
institution is preceded by the following minute con-
cerning the provisional committee of four : viz., —
" Into their hands we did put full power and authority to act,
order, and despatch all matters respecting the public weal and
dvil government of the plantation till a church was gathered
among us, which the Lord in mercy having now done according
to the desire of our hearts ; the said four men at the public meet-
ing having resigned up their trust as most safe and suitable for
securing of those main ends for which we came hither," &c.
What the main ends thus alluded to were, may be
learned from the following extract : —
•* The main ends which we propounded to ourselves in our com-
ing hither were that we may settle and uphold the ordinances of
God in an explicit Congregational church way with most purity,
peace, and liberty, for the benefit both of ourselves and our pos*
terities after us."
Their ideal church, for the realization of which they
had been willing to make so great sacrifices, was insti-
tuted June 19, 1643, after the example of New Haven
and Milford, by choosing seven men who might admit
other approved persons. The seven who were chosen
were Henry Whitfield, John Higginson, Samuel Des-
borough, William Leete, Jacob Sheafe, John Mepham,
and John Hoadley.
The settlement of their ecclesiastical and civil polity
may have been hastened by events taking place be-
yond the precincts of Guilford. Commissioners from
the four colonies of Massachusetts, Plymouth, Connecti-
cut, and 'New Haven had agreed on Articles of Con-
federation ; and these articles had been signed at Bos-
ton on the nineteenth day of May, just one month
170 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
before the church of Guilford was instituted. This
confederation of colonies was formed for mutual assist-
ance and defence, and was deemed especially neces-
sary in view of the distracted condition of England,
which forbade them to expect help from the mother
country in any quarrel that might arise with the colo-
nies of Holland or Sweden, or against any combina-
tion of savages to extirpate the white people.
Such a confederation of the four New England colo-
nies made it necessary that the plantations about New
Haven, if they would reap the expected advantages of
the confederation, should be combined into one colo-
nial government. The plantations at Stamford and
at Southold on Long Island were already united with
the plantation at New Haven in one jurisdiction.
Guilford accordingly qualified itself to be admitted, by
organizing its plantation government after the pattern
set by New Haven, and proposed by that plantation as
a condition of union with it in one colonial govern-
ment.
The planters of Guilford who were not church-mem-
bers were not inferior in magnanimous self-abnegation
to those of New Haven, who for the public- weal and
in allegiance to principle had relinquished the right of
suffrage. So far as is known, none objected to the
fundamental agreement thus expressed : " We do now
therefore, all and every of us, agree, order and conclude
that only such planters as are also members of the
church here shall be and be called freemen, and that
such freemen only shall have power to elect magis-
trates, deputies, and other officers of public interest or
authority in matters of importance concerning either
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, I /I
the civil affairs pr government here, from amongst
themselves and not elsewhere ; and to take an account
of all such officers for the honest and faithful discharge
of their several places respectively."
It will be observed that by this agreement civil pow-
er is restricted to members of the church in Guilford ;
while at New Haven church-membership in general
was the required qualification, and members of ** other
approved churches" were admitted freemen, as well as
members of the church in New Haven. But this di-
vergence from the New Haven rule was probably owing
to the fact that all church-members at Guilford entered
•
at once into the new ecclesiastical organization.
Southold on Long Island was settled by a compa-
ny emigrating from Norfolkshire, England, under the
guidance of Rev. John Youngs. As they sailed direct
for New Haven, it may be inferred that their leader was
in communication with Mr. Davenport, and had heard
from him since his arrival at Quinnipiac. There is no.
documentary testimony in regard to the time of their
arrival. The common opinion is, that they came over
in 1640; and this opinion seems to be founded on the
testimony of Trumbull, that Mr. Youngs gathered his
church anew on the 21st of October, 1640. But, if
they arrived in New Haven in the summer of 1640,
we should hardly expect, in view of what the planters
at New Haven, Milford, and Guilford did, that they,
would be prepared for the formal organization of a
church the same year. That they had been some time
on the ground when the church was instituted, appears
from the record "that one man sold his house only
172 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
four days afterward." ' If Mr. Youngs conferred with
Mr. Davenport in the spring of 1637, and waited to
hear that the latter had found " accommodations " suf-
ciently ample for himself and for his friends, he needed
not to wait longer than 1639. Moreover, tradition says
that Mr. Youngs' company staid some time at New
Haven. For these reasons it is not improbable that
they landed at New Haven in 1639, and that they came
in the vessel mentioned in Mr. Davenport's letter to
Lady Vere, "as expected daily." Be this as it may,
they not only shaped their institutions according to the
pattern set by the planters of New Haven, but placed
themselves from the first under the same jurisdiction.
Milford and Guilford, though using the mould fashioned
by Davenport and Eaton, had established each a juris-
diction entirely independent. But Southold, or Yenni-
cot (as it was for a time called), was a part of the
jurisdiction of New Haven. Hubbard says, "This came
to pass by reason of the purchase of the land by some
of New Haven, who disposed of it to the inhabitants
upon condition of their union." Perhaps it would be
more accurate to say that, Mr. Youngs' company hav-
ing been persuaded to unite their plantation with that
at New Haven under one jurisdiction, the magistrates
assisted them in their negotiations, and took the deed
in their own name as officers of the jurisdiction. That
the conveyance was made to the jurisdiction, and not
to the plantation of Southold, is evident from the peti-
tion of the freemen of Southold at a general court held
at New Haven for the jurisdiction, the 30th of May,
* History of Southold, by Rev. Epher Whitaker, in New Haven Colo-
ny Historical Society ColL, Vol II.
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, 1 73
1649, "that the purchase of their plantation might be
made over to them." But, though Yennicot was nomi-
nally a part of the jurisdiction of New Haven, it does
not appear that it was represented in any court at New
Haven, or that any legislative action was taken in re-
gard to it at New Haven for several years. Stamford
appears on the record earlier than Southold, as a plan-
tation combined with that at New Haven. The free-
men of Southold were for the time being, left to man-
age their own affairs, and no sufficiently cogent reason
urged them to send deputies to the court at New Haven.
" Among the early settlers," says Rev. Epher Whit-
aker, "were Rev. John Youngs, William Wells, Esq.,
Barnabas Horton, Peter Hallock, John Tuthill, Richard
Terry, Thomas Mapes, Matthias Corwin, Robert Ak-
erly, John Corey, John Conklyne, John Budd, Thomas
Moore, Richard Benjamin, Philemon Dickerson, Bar-
nabas Wines, James Reeve, William Purrier, John
Tucker, Jeremiah Vail, Henry Case, John Swazey,
Charles Glover, Robert Smyth, Richard Skidmore,
John Elton, Thomas Benedict, John Booth, Richard
Brown, Ralph Goldsmith, Simon Grover, Thomas
Cooper, Caleb Curtis, Thomas Dimon, James Haines,
John Herbert, Peter Paine, and Samuel King." But
some of these did not come from England with Mr.
Youngs' company, and did not become planters at
Southold when it was first settled. Lieut. John Budd
removed from New Haven, and probably others from
other plantations. Trumbull mentions Mr. Youngs,
Mr. William Wells, Mr. Barnabas Horton, Thomas
Mapes, John Tuthill, and Matthias Corwin as "some
of the principal men."
174 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
When Trumbull speaks of Mr. Youngs as gathering
his church anew, he seems to intimate that some of his
company had been under his pastoral care in England.
Youngs had probably been the pastor of a Separate or
Congregational church in Hingham, Norfolkshire, and,
like John Lothrop, had brought his church with him.
Though Trumbull says nothing of gathering the church
upon a foundation-work of seven men chosen for that
purpose, there can be no doubt, considering the close
union between New Haven and Southold, that the
church was gathered in that way, or that the seven
thus chosen were the foundation and beginning of the
general court, as well as of the church.
Stamford was purchased of the Indians by Capt.
Turner, as agent for the people of New Haven, July r,
1640. New Haven doubtless purchased the territory
for the sake of securing it for planters who would
establish institutions like her own. On the fourth day
of November in the same year, the General Court of
New Haven sold the territory to Andrew Ward and
Robert Coe, the representatives of about twenty-two
families wishing to leave Wethersfield, and establish a
new plantation after the pattern set by New Haven, and
under its jurisdiction. The terms of the sale were : —
" First, that they shall repay unto the said town of New Haven
all the charges which they have disbursed about it, which comes
to ;^33, as appears by a note or schedule hereunto annexed.
Secondly, that they reserve a fifth part of the said plantation to
be disposed of at the appointment of this court to such desirable
persons as may be expected, or as God shall send hither; pro-
vided, that, if within one whole year such persons do not come to
fill up those lots so reserved, that then it shall be free for the said
MILFORD, GUILFORD, SOUTHOLD, STAMFORD, 1 75
people to nominate and present to this court some persons of their
own choice who may fill up some of those lots so reserved if this
court should approve of them. Thirdly, that they join in all points
with this plantation in the form of government here settled."
•
Trumbull says that the whole number for whom the
purchase was made, obliged themselveis to remove with
their families the next year before the last of Novem-
ber, and that the settlement commenced in the spring
of 1641. He mentions as the principal planters, Rev.
Richard Denton, Mr. Matthew Mitchel, Mr. Thurston
Raynor, Mr. Andrew Ward, Mr. Robert Coe, and Mr.
Richard Gildersleeve. He might have added the name
of Francis Bell, who, with Andrew Ward, was present
at a general court of election held at New Haven the
27th of October, 1641, where they were admitted mem-
bers of the court, and received the charge of freemen.
Their presence as members of the court is the first inti-
mation in the records that that assembly had become
a court for the plantations combined in the jurisdiction
of New Haven. At the same court "Thurston Raynor
(was) chosen constable for Rippowams, to order such
business as may fall in that town, according to God, for
the ensuing year ; but is not to be established in his
office till he have received his charge from this court,
and signified his acceptance thereof to this court."
On the 6th of April, 1642, Matthew Mitchell and
John Whitmore of Rippowams were admitted members
of the court, and accepted the charge of freemen. On
the same day " the plantation of Rippowams is named
Stamford." The record styles Mitchell and Whitmore
"deputies for Stamford," as if they had been appointed
by the freemen of that plantation to attend as their
z>
I.
1/6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
deputies. Doubtless Andrew Ward and Francis Bell
had received a similar appointment in the preceding
autumn.
At the same court John Tuthill of Southold was
appointed " constable to order the affairs of that planta-
tion, the time being, till some further course be taken
by this court for the settling a magistracy there accord-
ing to God."
The court, having thus assumed to legislate for other
plantations than New Haven, " ordered that every first
Wednesday in April, and every Wednesday in the last
whole week in October, shall be a general court held at
New Haven for the plantations in combination with this f^
town,^^
This may be regarded as the first formal institution
of colonial government at New Haven. The General
Court, so far as appears from the records, had confined
its legislation to the affairs of the New Haven plan-
tation till October, 1641. At its next semi-annual
meeting, it declares itself to be, in all its regular semi-
annual meetings, a colonial legislature, having juris-
diction over the combined plantations of New Haven,
Southold, and Stamford.
In the next chapter we have to relate how Guilford
and Milford, which, though organized after the pattern
of New Haven, were entirely independent, became
united with the three plantations mentioned above as
already combined in one jurisdiction, and how the
colony which included these five plantations united with
other colonies in a confederation which they called
"The United Colonies of New England."
CHAPTER X.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A COLONIAL GOVERNMENT.
IN narrating the settlement of Stamford, we showed
that its freemen were received as members of the
General Court at New Haven. The court by so receiv-
ing them became a court for the jurisdiction. Six
months afterward, when Stamford again made its ap-
pearance, the court formally declared that in its regu-
lar April and October meetings it was "a General
Court held at New Haven for the plantations in com-
bination with this town." Its records, however, were
made in the same book and by the same secretary as
before, and are intermingled with those of the New
Haven plantation courts, both general and particular.
The general courts for the jurisdiction are not dis-
tinguished from the general courts previously held in
April and October by any different title, till the secre-
tary styles it on the 26th of October, 1643, **^ General
Court of Election held at New Haven for this juris-
diction;" and on the following day, "a General Court
held at New Haven for the jurisdiction." Thereafter,
as long as its proceedings were recorded in the same
book, this colonial assembly is distinguished by this
title from an assembly of the freemen resident at New
Haven, which was sometimes but not always contra
177
1/8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY. *
distinguished as " a General Court held at New Haven
for the plantation." The record-book of the New-
Haven plantation records only two courts for the
jurisdiction later than April, 1644, — one a court of
magistrates held June 14, 1646, and the other a court
of election held Oct. 27 in the same year. Plainly some
other book was ordinarily used ; and probably some
other secretary had been appointed in place of Fugill,
who acted as secretary for the jurisdiction till April,
1644. Unfortunately the first record-book belonging to
the jurisdiction has been lost ; and there is consequent-
ly, with the exception mentioned, a hiatus in the rec-
ords of the jurisdiction extending from April, 1644, to
May, 1653. The history of the colony during this
period of nine years must be gleaned from the records
of the towns and of the United Colonies. After May,
1653* the records are complete, and furnish more copi-
ous information. At a general court held at New
Haven on the 5th of April, 1643, the transaction of
business, both for the jurisdiction and for the town,
shows that the court itself, as well as its secretary,
had not quite learned to discriminate between the local
and the colonial government. Besides calling Good-
man Osborne to account for spoiling divers hides in the
tanning, and ordering " that sister Preston shall sweep
and dress the meeting-house every week, and have one
shilling a week for her pains,'* the court appointed
Thurston Raynor " magistrate to execute that office at
Stamford until the next general court of election at
New Haven, which will be in October next," and
"ordered that those four men already employed in
the town's occasions there, namely, Capt. John Under-
A COLONIAL GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED, 1 79
hill, Mr. Mitchell, Andrew Ward, and Robert Coe,
shall assist as the deputies at New Haven in counsel
and advice for the more comely carrying on of public
afiFairs."
Thus Stamford, like New Haven, had its magistrate
and its four deputies. The meaning of the specifica-
tion that the deputies should assist the magistrate in
counsel and advice will be seen by referring to the
order appointing " the deputies at New Haven " six
months before, which reads thus: "Mr. Malbon, Mr.
Gregson, Mr. Gilbert, and Mr. Wakeman are chosen
deputies for this ensuing year to assist in the courts
by way of advice, but not to have any power by way
of sentence."
There is no evidence that a magistracy had been at
this time set up at Southold. The freemen there held
general courts in which the affairs of the plantation
were ordered ; and these assemblies were convened by
persons commissioned to do so, and to act for the free-
men in the intervals between, the courts as the select-
men of a town now are. Besides these plantation offi-
cers, there was a constable at Southold appointed by
the jurisdiction to be its representative and functionary
till a magistracy should be settled.
Such was the condition of the colonial government
when it entered into confederation with the colonies of
Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Connecticut, in 1643.
A confederation of colonics had been proposed, and
artcles of union had been drawn, before any govern-
ment had been established at Quinnipiac. Gov. Haynes
and Rev. Mr. Hooker of Connecticut had spent nearly
a month in Massachusetts in 1639, endeavoring to
l8o HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
carry the project into effect. Various obstacles had
retarded the desired union. Massachusetts, being
much more populous and powerful than the other
colonies, was not favorable to union on equal terms.
The other colonies were still more averse to terms
which implied inferiority. Besides, there were ques-
tions at issue between Massachusetts and Connecticut
in regard to the Pequot country, Massachusetts claiming
a part of it for the assistance she rendered in the Pe-
quot war ; and in regard to the boundary between the
two colonies, Connecticut claiming the towns of Spring-
field and Westfield.
The union was finally consummated, notwithstanding
the difficulties in the way. Their Dutch neighbors
were troublesome to the planters of Connecticut and
New Haven, and the Indians in various places through-
out New England were hostile. The triumph of the
Puritan party in the mother-country had brought to an
end the large accessions of strength from that source,
which till recently the colonies had annually received.
Each of the parties needed, or might at any moment
need, help from the others.
At a general court, the 6th of April, 1643, "it was
ordered that Mr. Eaton and Mr. Gregson, as commis-
sioners from this jurisdiction of New Haven, shall go
with other commissioners for other plantations into the
Bay of Massachusetts, to treat about a general combi-
nation for all the plantations in New England, and to
conclude and determine the same, as in their wisdom
they shall see cause, for the exalting of Christ's ends,
and advancing the public good in all the plantations."
These commissioners met similar appointees from
A COLONIAL GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED. l8l
Connecticut, Plymouth, and Massachusetts at Boston ;
and, on the 19th of May, articles of union were com-
pleted and signed by the representatives of Connecticut,
New Haven, and Massachusetts. The commissioners
of Plymouth approved the articles, but were not author-
ized to sign them. But, being afterward empowered
to do so, they signed them in the following Septem-
ber.
These articles declare in substance : —
I. That the four colonies agree to be and to be called, The
United Colonies of New England.
II. That they enter into a league of amity for offence and
defence, mutual advice and succor.
III. That each colony shall have peculiar jurisdiction and gov-
ernment within its own limits ; that without consent of all, no two
members shall be united in one, and no new members shall be
received.
IV. That the expense of wars shall be borne in proportion to
the number of male inhabitants between sixteen and sixty years of
age.
V. That its confederates shall aid any colony invaded by an
enemy in the proportion, of one hundred men for Massachusetts,
and forty-five for each of the other colonies.
VI. That each of the four colonies shall choose two commis-
sioners, " being all in church fellowship with us, who shall bring
full power from their several general courts respectively, to hear,
examine, weigh, and determine all affairs of war and peace, leagues,
aids, charges, and number of men for war, division of spoils, or
whatsoever is gotten by conquest, receiving of more confederates
or plantations into combination with any of these confederates,
and all things of like nature which are the proper concomitants or
consequents of such a confederation for amity, offence, and defence,
not intermeddling with the government of any of the jurisdictions,
which by the third article is preserved entirely to themselves ; " and
that, if these eight do not agree, then any six agreeing shall have
power to determine the business in question.
l82 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
VII. That the eight commissioners at each meeting may choose
a president by the concurrence of all or ot six.
VIII. That the commissioners shall frame and establish such
orders as may preserve friendship between the members of the
union, and prevent occasions of war with others. Under this head
are specified, the free and speedy passage of justice in each juris-
diction to all the confederates equally as to their own ; not receiv-
ing those that remove from one plantation to another without due
certificates ; how all the jurisdictions may carry it toward the
Indians ; and the surrender of fugitive servants and fugitive
criminals.
IX. That no colony may engage in war without the consent of
all, unless upon some exigency.
X. That in extraordinary occasions, four commissioners, if more
are not present, may direct a war which cannot be delayed, sending
for due proportion of men out of each jurisdiction ; but that the
expense of a war thus begun may not be levied till at least six
commissioners have approved of their action.
XI. That if any colony shall break any article of the confedera-
tion, or injure one of the other colonies, such breach or injury shall
be considered and ordered by the commissioners of the three
other confederates.
XII. That this confederation and the several articles and agree-
ments thereof were freely allowed and confirmed by Massachusetts,
Connecticut, and New Haven, and, if Plymouth consents, the
whole treaty, as it stands, is and shall continue firm and stable
without alteration ; but, if Plymouth consents not, then the other
three confederates confirm the confederation and all its articles,
except that new consideration may be taken of the sixth article
which determines the number of commissioners for meeting and
determining the affairs of this confederation.
When the colony of New Haven entered into this
confederation, it consisted only of the plantations of
New Haven, Southold, and Stamford ; but Guilford,
establishing a plantation government in the following
month, was ready to become incorporated into the
A COLONIAL GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED. 1 83
colony as soon thereafter as the consent of the confed-
erated colonies could be obtained. Such consent was
obtained in the following September, at tile first meet-
ing of the commissioners held under the articles. At
the same meeting, " upon a motion made by the commis-
sioners for New Haven jurisdiction, it was granted and
ordered that the town of Milford may ^be received into
combination and as a member of the jurisdiction of
New Haven, if New Haven and Milford agree upon the
terms and conditions among themselves."
The obstacle which had delayed the entrance of Mil-
ford into the combination will be sufficiently displayed
by the record of the action taken at New Haven for its
admission. We transcribe, therefore, without abridg-
ment, the proceedings at a general court held at New
Haven, the 23d of October, 1643 : —
" Whereas this plantation at first with general and full consent
laid their foundations that none but members of approved churches
should be accounted free burgesses, nor should any else have any
vote in any election, or power or trust in ordering of civil affairs,
in which way we have constantly proceeded hitherto in our whole
court with much comfortable fruit through God's blessing; and
whereas Stamford, Guilford, and Yennicock have, upon the same
• foundations and engagements, entered into combination with us :
this court was now informed that of late there have been some
meetings and treaties between some of Milford and Mr. Eaton,
about a combination, by which it appeareth that Milford hath
formerly taken in as free burgesses, six planters who are not in
church-fellowship, which hath bred some difficulty in the passages
of this treaty, but at present it stands thus : the deputies for Mil-
ford have offered, in the name both of the church and the town.
First, that the present six free burgesses who are not church-mem-
bers shall not at any time hereafter be chosen, either deputies or into
any public trust for the combination; Secondly, that they shall
l84 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
neither personally, nor by proxy, vote at any time in the election of
magistrates ; and, Thirdly^ that none shall be admitted freemen or
free burgesses^ereafter at Milford, but church-members according
to the practice at New Haven. Thus far they granted, but in two
particulars they and their said six freemen desire liberty : First, that
the said six freemen, being already admitted by them, may continue
to act in all proper particular town business wherein the combina-
tion is not interested ; and. Secondly, that they may vote in the
election of deputies to be sent to the general courts for the combina-
tion or jurisdiction, which deputies so to be chosen and sent shall
always be church-members."
" The premises being seriously considered by the whole court,
the brethren did express themselves as one man, clearly and fully,
that in the foundations laid for civil government they have attend-
ed their light, and should have failed in their duty, had they done
otherwise, and professed themselves careful and resolved not to
shake the said groundworks by any change for any respect, and
ordered that this their understanding of this their way and resolu-
tion'to maintain it should be entered with their vote in this busi-
ness, as a lasting record. But not foreseeing any danger in yield-
ing to Milford with the forementioned cautions, it was by general
consent and vote, ordered that the consociation proceed in all
things according to the premises."
The action taken above was the action of the town
(as a plantation about that time began to be called) of
New Haven ; but it seems to have determined the
question respecting the admission of Milford. Three
days afterward a general court of election for the juris-
diction was held at New Haven, at which two magis-
trates were chosen for Milford ; and on the next day
after the election a general court for the jurisdiction
was held, at which the two magistrates for Milford
were present, as were also two deputies appointed by
that town. At this general court a constitution for
the colonial government was adopted, the provisions of
which were as follows : —
A COLONIAL .GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED, 185
1. "It was agreed and concluded as a fundamental order, not to
be disputed or questioned hereafter, that none shall be admitted
to be free burgesses in any of the plantations within this jurisdic-
tion for the future, but such planters as are members of some or
other of the approved churches in New England ; nor shall any but
such free burgesses have any vote in any election (the six present
freemen at Milford enjoying the liberty with the cautions agreed) ;
nor shall any power or trust in the ordering of any civil affairs be
at any time put into the hands of any other than such church-mem-
bers, though, as free planters, all have rights to their inheritance
and to commerce, according to such grants, orders, and laws as
shall be made concerning the same."
2. " All such free burgesses shall have power in each town or
plantation within this jurisdiction to choose fit and able men from
amongst themselves, being church-members as before, to be the
ordinary judges to hear and determine all inferior causes, whether
civil or criminal, provided that no civil cause to be tried in any of
these Plantation Courts in value exceed twenty pounds sterling,
and that the punishment in such criminals, according to the mind
of God revealed in his word, touching such offences, do not exceed
stocking and whipping, or if the fine be pecuniary, that it exceed
not five pounds. In which court the magistrate or magistrates, if
any be chosen by the free burgesses of the jurisdiction for that
plantation, shall sit and assist with due respect to their place, and
sentence shall pass according to the vote of the major part of each
such court ; only, if the parties or any of them be not satisfied with
the justice of such sentences or executions, appeals or complaints
may be made from and against these courts to the court of magis-
trates for the whole jurisdiction."
3. "All such free burgesses through the whole jurisdiction,
shall have vote in the election of all magistrates, whether governor,
deputy governor, or other magistrates, with a treasurer, a secre-
tary, and a marshal, &c., for the jurisdiction. And for the ease of
those free burgesses, especially in the more remote plantations,
they may by proxy vote in these elections, though absent, their
votes being sealed up in the presence of the free burgesses them-
selves, that their several liberties may be preserved, and their
votes directed according to their own particular light ; and these
1 86 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
•
free burgesses may, at every election, choose so many magistrates
for each plantation, as the weight of afiEairs may require, and as
they find fit men for that trust But it is provided and agreed,
that no plantation shall at any election be left Restitute of a magis-
trate if they desire one to be chosen out of those in church fellow-
ship with them."
4. " All the magistrates for the whole jurisdiction shall meet
twice a year at New Haven, namely, the Monday immediately
before the sitting of the two fixed general courts hereafter men-
tioned, to keep a court called the Court of Magistrates, for the trial
of weighty and capital cases, whether civil or criminal, above those
limited to the ordinary judges in the particular plantations, and to
receive and try all appeals brought unto them from the aforesaid
Plantation Courts, and to call all the inhabitants, whether free
burgesses, free planters, or others, to account for the breach of any
laws established, and for other misdemeanors, and to censure
them according to the quality of the offence, in which meetings of
magistrates, less than four shall not be accounted a court, nor
shall they carry on any business as a court ; but it is expected and
required that all the magistrates in this jurisdiction do constantly
attend the public service at the* times before mentioned, and if any
of them be absent at one of the clock in the afternoon on Monday
aforesaid, when the court shall sit, or if any of them depart the
town without leave, while the court sits, he or they shall pay for
any such default, twenty shillings fine, unless some providence of
God occasion the same, which the Court of Magistrates shall judge
of from time to time, and all sentences in this court shall pass by
the vote of the major part of magistrates therein ; but from this
Court of Magistrates appeals and complaints may be made and
brought to the General Court as the last and highest for this
jurisdiction; but in all appeals or complaints from or to what
courts soever, due costs and damages shall be paid by him or
them that make appeal or complaint without just cause."
5. " Besides the Plantation Courts, and Courts of Magistrates,
there shall be a General Court for the jurisdiction, which shall con-
sist of the governor, deputy-governor, and all the magistrates within
the jurisdiction, and two deputies for every plantation in the juris-
diction, which deputies shall from time to time be chosen against
A COLONIAL GOVERNMENT ESTABLISHED, 1 8/
the approach of any such general court by the aforesaid free bur-
gesses, and sent with due certificate to assist in the same, all which,
both governor and deputy-governor, magistrates, and deputies, shall
have their vote in the said court This general court shall always
sit at New Haven (unless upon weighty occasions the general court
see cause for a time to sit elsewhere), and shall assemble twice
every year; namely, the first Wednesday in April and the last
Wednesday in October, in the latter of which courts the governor,
the deputy-governor, and all the magistrates for the whole jurisdic-
tion, with a treasurer, a secretary, and a marshal, shall yearly be
chosen by all the free burgesses before mentioned, besides which
two fixed courts, the governor, or in his absence the deputy-gov-
ernor, shall have power to summon a general court at any other
time, as the urgent and extraordinary occasions of the jurisdiction
may require ; and at all general courts, whether ordinary or extraor-
dinary, the governor and deputy-governor, and all the rest of the
magistrates for the jurisdiction, with the deputies for the several
plantations, shall sit together till the affairs of the jurisdiction' be
despatched or may safely be respited ; and if any of the said magis-
trates or deputies shall either be absent at the first sitting of the
said general court (unless some providence of God hinder, which
the said court shall judge of), or depart, or absent themselves dis-
orderly before the court be finished, he or they shall each of them
pay twenty shillings fine, with due consideration of further aggra-
vations, if there shall be cause ; which general court shall, with all
care and diligence, provide for the maintenance of the purity of
religion, and shall suppress the contrary, according to their best
light from the word of God and all wholesome and sound advice
which shall be given by the elders and churches in the jurisdic-
tion, so far as may concern their civil power to deal therein."
" Secondly, they shall have power to make and repeal laws, and,
while they are in force, to require execution of them in all the sev-
eral plantations."
"Thirdly, to impose an oath upon all the magistrates for the
faithful discharge of the trust committed to them, according to
their best abilities, and to call them to account for the breach of
any laws established, or for other misdemeanors, and to censure
them as the quality of the offence shall require."
1 88 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" Fourthly, to impose an oath of fidelity and due subjection to
the laws upon all the free burgesses, free planters, and other
inhabitants within the whole jurisdiction."
'* Fifthly, to settle and levy rates and contributions upon all the
several plantations, for the public service of the plantation."
*' Sixthly, to hear and determine all causes, whether civil or
criminal, which by appeal or complaint shall be orderly brought
unto them from any of the other courts, or from any of the other
plantations. In all which, with whatsoever else shall fall within
their cognizance or judicature, they shall proceed according to the
Scriptures, which is the rule of all righteous laws and sentences ;
and nothing shall pass as an act of the general court, but by the
consent of the major part of magistrates and the greater part of
deputies."
The adoption of this constitution seems to have put
an-end to that confusion of ideas which had sometimes
allowed the administration of both plantation and colo-
nial a£Eairs in the same court. The written constitution
may have helped the New Haven men to discriminate ;
and the presence in the court of members from Guilford
and Milford, hitherto independent plantations, necessa-
rily tended strongly in the same direction. The colo-
nial constitution remained substantially the same from
this time till the colony was absorbed into Connecticut,
more than twenty years afterward. The union of these
plantations in a colonial government, and the confed-
eration of the colony with the other colonies of New
England, were auxiliary to security and peace.
CHAPTER XL
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS.
FROM the establishment of the New Haven colo-
nial government, to its extinction by the absorption
of the colony into Connecticut, there was a period of
twenty-two years. Before proceeding to narrate the
political history of the colony during this period, we
propose to give some account of the various industries
in which its people were employed ; of its institutions
for the maintenance of intelligence, morality, and reli-
gion ; of its military organization and achievements ; of
the aboriginal inhabitants with whom its people had
intercourse ; and of the domestic and social life which
resulted from these concurrent influences.
The leading men at Quinnipiac, having been engaged
in commerce before their emigration, endeavored to
make their new plantation a commercial town. Trade
was soon established with Boston, New Amsterdam, —
as New York was then called, — Delaware Bay, Vir-
ginia, Barbadoes, and England.
Supplies from the mother-country came chiefly by
way of Boston ; for the three ships which in 1639 sailed
direct from England to Quinnipiac were exceptions to
the custom that emigrants into New England landed in
189
igO HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Massachusetts. If the tide of emigration had not
ebbed soon after the settlement was made at Quinni-
piac, ships from England might have cast anchor in its
"fair haven" with such frequency as to render the
plantations in the neighborhood independent of Boston
as a base of supplies. But, as it happened, small
vessels owned in New Haven, and navigated by her
seamen, sailed frequently to and fro between the two
ports. Doubtless they sometimes returned home
freighted with merchandise purchased of Massachusetts
men ; but there is evidence that New Haven merchants
exported and imported by way of Boston, sending their
beaver a^d other furs to be transferred to the ships
which had brought them English goods.
The diary of Winthrop records several such voyages
that were disastrous, and others that were dangerous,
though without fatal results. Nicholas Augur, one of
the earliest physicians at New Haven, occupied himself
to some extent, as did also his colleagues in the practice
of medicine, in commercial adventures. In 1669, "being
about to sail for Boston," he made his will, as if he
regarded the voyage as exposing him to unusual peril of
his life. In 1676 he made another voyage to the same
port ; and on his return, setting sail from Boston on the
tenth of September, he was shipwrecked on an uninhab-
ited island off Cape Sable, where he and all his fellow-
voyagers died except Ephraim Howe, the captain of the
ketch, who, having endured great hardship during the
winter, was taken off by a vessel in the following sum-
mer and carried to Salem, whence he returned to his
family at New Haven after an absence of nearly eleven
months. The pinnaces, shallops, and ketches employed
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, IQI
in this coasting-trade, carried letters and packages from
friend to friend ; seamen and passengers rendering
such service as is now performed by express-companies
and by the postmen of the government.'
The trade with Manhattan, as Fort Amsterdam is at
first named in the records, did not apparently include
any great amount of European supplies : otherwise it
was in general of similar character to that maintained
with Massachusetts Bay. The Dutch however, being
exempt from the prejudice against tobacco manifested
by the good people of Boston, the merchants of New
Haven, when they anchored at Fort Amsterdam on
their return from a southern voyage, carried on shore
many hogsheads of this Virginia product. ^ To the
same market they conveyed their imports from the
West Indies, such as cotton, sugar, molasses, and
" strong water ; " completing a cargo with such prod-
ucts of their own neighborhood as wheat, biscuit, beef,
' The germ of a post-office appears in an order of the General Court of
Massachusetts passed Nov. 5, 1639: "For preventing the miscarriage of
letters, it is ordered, that notice be given that Richard Fairbanks's house
in Boston is the place appointed for all letters which are brought from
beyond the seas, or are to be sent thither, to be brought unto ; and he is
to take care that they be delivered or sent according to their direc-
tions; and he is allowed for every such letter one penny, and must an-
swer all miscarriages through his own neglect in this kind ; provided that
n^ man shall be compelled to bring his letters thither, except he please."
• Sumptuary laws were early enacted in Massachusetts, prohibiting the
use of and the traffic in tobacco. These laws were repealed, in 1637,
while the New Haven company were sojourning in Massachusetts ; but,
though the prohibitory laws were repealed, some of the prejudice which
led to their enactment must have remained. The only law regulating the
use of tobacco, at New Haven, was one passed by the general court for
the jurisdiction in reference to danger from fire.
192 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
pork, hides, and furs. It is not so evident what they
received in return ; but probably the trade between the
two towns was chiefly an exchange of merchandise for
the supply of whatever articles might be temporarily
scarce and dear in either market. The Dutch at one
time attempted to discriminate between their own
shipping and that of their English neighbors, requiring
the latter to anchor under " an erected hand," and to
pay an ad valorem duty of ten per cent on all imports
and exports ; but were shamed into reciprocity by the
sharp pen of Gov. Eaton, backed by the commissioners
of the United Colonies.
Stephen Goodyear, who in the prosecution of this
commerce between the towns often visited Fort Am-
sterdam, purchased there of the Dutch governor a ship
called the ZwoU, to be delivered in the harbor of
New Haven. ' Under pretext of conveying the ship in
safety, the Dutch put soldiers on board, who on a
Sunday boarded and seized the St. Beninio, a Dutch
vessel lying in the harbor of New Haven, and carried
her away to Fort Amsterdam, where the vessel was
confiscated as a smuggler, the owner having evaded
payment of certain duties or "recognitions'* claimed
by his government. William Westerhouse, who owned
the vessel, and Samuel Goodenhouse, another Dutch
merchant in some way implicated in the business, were
then sojourning at New Haven, and, finding it more
agreeable to remain than to follow the vessel which
had been seized, placed themselves under the protec-
tion of the court, and became permanent residents.
The settlement at New Haven of these strangers
served to abate somewhat the commercial discour-
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. I93
agement consequent on a succession of losses. The ac-
quisition of Westerhouse was additionally pleasing, be-
cause he was not only a merchant, but a practitioner of
medicine. Not long after he became a citizen, he in-
trusted a cask of liquor to John Lawrencson to be
retailed. Some disorder having attracted attention, a
fine was imposed upon Lawrencson for "selling strong
waters by small quantities," contrary to an order of
the court. Westerhouse, hearing of it, " acquainted the
court through Mr. Evance, his interpreter, that he
knew it not to be an offence to the court that he em-
ployed any to sell his strong water, but seeing he had
done it he justified the court in the fine they had laid,
and he came to tender the payment. The court told
him they looked not upon it as his fault, for they
intended not to fine him ; but, seeing he would pay it,
the court considering how useful he had been in the
town by giving physic to many persons, and to some
of them freely, the court agreed not to take the fine,
but returned it to him again."
Within three years after the foundations of govern-
ment had been laid at New Haven, ** there was a pur-
chase made by some particular persons of sundry plan-
tations in Delaware Bay, at their own charge, for the
advancement of public good, as in a way of trade, so also
for the settling of churches and plantations in those
parts in combination with this. And thereupon it was
propounded to the general court, whether plantations
should be settled in Delaware Bay in combination with
this town, — yea or nay ; and, upon consideration and
debate, it was assented unto by the court, and expressed
194 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
by holding up of hands." This attempt to establish an
English settlement in Delaware Bay encountered oppo-
sition from the Dutch and from the Swedes, both of
whom claimed exclusive jurisdiction in those waters,
and, though contending one with the other, united in
resisting the English. In 1642 the governor of New
Amsterdam " despatched an armed force, and with great
hostility burned the English trading-houses, violently
seized and for a time detained their goods, and would
not give them time to take an inventory of them. The
Dutch also took the company's boat, and a number of
the English planters whom they kept as prisoners.
The damages done to the English at Delaware were
estimated at a thousand pounds sterling." '
The same year the Swedish governor seized and
imprisoned George Lamberton, "master of the pin-
nace called the Cock," and some of his seamen, on a
false charge of inciting the Indians to rise against
the Swedes. Finding himself unable to support the
charge, he improved the opportunity to impose a fine
for trading at Delaware, though within the limits of the
New Haven purchase. Not long after, Mr. Lamberton,
happening to be at New Amsterdam, was compelled by
the Dutch governor to give an account of all the beaver
he had purchased at the New Haven trading-post in
Delaware Bay, and to pay an impost upon the whole.
The next year. New Haven becoming confederate
with the other New England colonies, the commis-
sioners of the United Colonies sent letters of remon-
strance to the Dutch and the Swedes, and gave Lam-
berton a commission to treat with the Swedish
» Trumbull
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, I9S
governor in their name about satisfaction for the in-
juries done him, and about the settlement of an English
plantation in Delaware Bay.
The settlement of a plantation was delayed, however,
from one year to another, till, in 1651, a company of
about fifty men, chiefly from New Haven and Totoket,
afterwards called Branford, started on a voyage for
Delaware Bay with the intention of beginning the plan-
tation so long kept in abeyance. Bearing a commis-
sion from Gov. Eaton, and letters from him and from
the governor of Massachusetts to the Dutch governor,
explaining their intention, and assuring him that they
would settle upon their own lands only and give no
disturbance to their neighbors, they came to anchor
at New Amsterdam, and sent their letters on shore.
" But no sooner had Gov. Stuyvesant received the letters
than he arrested the bearers, and committed them close
prisoners under guard. Then sending for the master of
the vessel to come on shore, that he might speak with
him, he arrested and committed him. Others, as they
came on shore to visit and assist their neighbors, were
confined with them. The Dutch governor desired to see
their commission, promising it should be returned when
he had taken a copy. But, when it was demanded of
him, he would not return it to them. Nor would he
release the men from confinement until he had forced
them to give it under their hands that they would not
prosecute their voyage, but, without loss of time, return
to New Haven. He threatened, that, if he should after-
wards find any of them at Delaware, he would not only
seize their goods, but send them prisoners into Hol-
land." '
« TrumbulL
196 HISTORY OF KEIV HAVEN COLOXV.
Three years later, as appears from the following ex-
tract from the records, another attempt was made : —
"At a general court for the town of New Haven, Nov. 2, 1654,
the governor read a letter he wrote on the 6th of July, by order
of the general court, to the Swedish governor, with his answer in
Latin, dated Aug. i, and the answer of the commissioners to
that, dated Sept. 23. At the same time he informed them, that,
while attending the meeting of the commissioners at Hartford,
several had spoken with him in reference to settling at Delaware
Bay, if it might be planted. The town was desired to consider
which way it may be carried on. After much debate about it, and
scarce any manifesting their willingness to go at present, a com-
mittee was chosen; viz., Robert Seely,' William Davis, Thomas
Munson, and Thomas Jeffrey, to whom any that are willing to go
may repair to be taken notice of, and that, if there be cause, they
treat with those of New Haven who have purchased those lands, to
know what consideration they expect for them.''
** On the 27th of November the committee reported that they
had spoken with sundry persons in the town, but that not answer-
ing expectation, they got a meeting of the brethren and neigh-
bors, and for the most part they were willing to help forward the
work, some in person, others in estate, so the work might be
carried on and foundations laid according to God: and at that
meeting they desired that the governor and one of the magis-
trates, with one or both the elders, might by their persons help
forward that work, whereupon they had a church-meeting, and
propounded their desire. The elders declared they were willing
to further the work, and glad it was in hand: but Mr. Davenport
said in reference to his health, he sees not his way clear to engage
in it in person; nor Mr. Hooke, because his wife is gone for
England, and he knows not how God will dispose of her. The
governor gave no positive answer, but said it was worthy of con-
sideration.*'
" They further informed that some from other plantations see
a need of the work, and are willing to engage in it. and the rather
if it be begun by New Haven, and foundations laid as here, and
government so carried on, thinking it will be for the good of them
and their posterity."
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. I97
" They also declared that they had treated with the proprietors
about the purchase of the land, and understand that they are out
above six hundred pounds, but are willing to take three hundred
pounds to be paid in four years."
Mr. Samuel Eaton ' and Mr. Francis Newman, being
invited to go with the company as magistrates, took the
matter into consideration, and on the 4th of December
signified their conditional assent. At a general court
for the jurisdiction, on the thirtieth day of the following
January, a petition was presented on behalf of a com-
pany of persons intending to remove to Delaware Ba}%
wherein they propounded that the Court " would afford
some encouragement to help forward so public a work."
The Court returned answer : —
"I. That they are willing so Sar to deny themselves for the fur-
therance of that work in order to the ends propounded, as to grant
liberty to one or both of those magistrates mentioned to go along
with them, who, with such other fit persons as this court shall see
meet to join with them, may be empowered for managing of all mat-
ters of civil government there, according to such commission as
shall be given them by this court."
" 2. That they will either take the propriety of all the purchased
lands into their own hands, or leave it to such as shall undertake
the planting of it, provided that it be and remain a part or member
of this jurisdiction. And for their encouragement they purpose
* The person here intended was a son of Theophilus Eaton by his first
wife. He graduated at Harvard College in 1649. 1" April, 1654, the
people of New Haven, " hearing that Mr. Samuel Eaton, son of our gov-
ernor, is now sent for into the Bay, which, if attended to, they feared they
may be deprived, not only for the present, but for the future, of the help-
fulness which they have hoped for from him, and considering the small
number of first able helps here for the work of magistracy for the
present, who also by age are wearing away," induced him to remain with
them by offering to elect him magistrate. He was accordingly elected, and
had now been in office about six months.
198 HISTORY OF ISTEIV HAVEN COLOXY,
when God shall so enlarge the English plantations in Delaware as
that they shall grow the greater part of the jurisdiction, that then
due consideration shall be taken for the ease and conveniency of
both parts, as that the governor may be one year in one part and
the next year in another, and the deput}* governor to be in that
part where the governor is not, and that general courts for making
laws may be ordinarily but once a year, and where the governor
resides ; and if God much increase plantations in Dela^-are, and
diminish them in these parts, then possibly they may see cause
that the governor may be constantly there and the deputy governor
here, but that the lesser part of the jurisdiction be protected and
eased by the greater part, both in rates and othenii-ise, which they
conceive will be both acceptable to God and (as appears by the
conclusions of the commissioners anno 165 1) most satisfying to
the rest of the United Colonies."
" 3. That for the matters of charge propounded for encourage-
ment to be given or lent, to help on their first beginnings, they will
propound the things to the several particular plantations, and pro-
mote the business for procuring something that way, and shall
return their answer with all convenient speed."
A special messenger was sent to Massachusetts in
hope of securing recruits from that colony ; for at a
general court for the town of New Haven held on the
1 6th of the following March: —
" The town was informed that the occasion of this meeting is to
let them understand how things are at present concerning Delaware,
now John Cooper is returned. He finds little encouragement in the
Bay, few being willing to engage in it at present, and therefore they
may consider whether to carry it on themselves or to let it fall.
Mr. Goodyear said, notwithstanding the discouragements from the
Bay, if a considerable company appear that will go, he will adven-
ture his person and estate to go with them in that design : but a
report of three ships being come to the Swedes, seems to make the
business more difficult After much debate about it, it was voted
by the town in this case, that they will be at twenty or thirty pounds
charge ; that Mr. Goodyear, Sergeant Jeffrey, and such other as they
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, I99
may think fit to take with them, may go to Delaware, and carry the
commissioners' letter, and treat with the Swedes about a peaceable
settlement of the English upon their own right ; and then after har-
vest, if things be cleared the company may resort thither for the
planting of it."
On the 9th of April (1655) : —
" The town was informed that there were several who have pur-
poses to go, but they conceive they want number of men and estate
to carry it on ; now if any be willing to further it in person or estate,
they may do well to declare it. It having been first made known
to them, that, though they may go free and not engaged to be a
part of this jurisdiction, yet they and all such as come after must
engage upon the same foundations of government as were at first
laid at New Haven, which were now read unto them, and though
some objections were made, yet notwithstanding the business pro-
ceeded, and divers declared themselves willing to further it."
" And for their further encouragement the town granted, if any
go and leave none in their family fit to watch, their wives shall not
be put upon the trouble and charge to hire a watchman, the persons
only which are present being to carry on that service. They also
further agreed to lend the company the two small guns which are
the town's, or else one of them and one of the bigger, if they can
procure leave of the jurisdiction for it, with at least half a hundred
of shot for that bigger gun if they have it, and a meet proportion
of musket bullets, according to what the town hath, and also a
barrel of that powder which the town bought of Mr. Evance. And
concerning their houses and lands which they leave, what of them
lieth unimproved shall be freed from all rates one year and a half
from the time they leave them, paying as now they do for what they
improve. Then they shall have one year's time more, that they
shall pay but one penny an acre for fenced land and meadow as
they do at present."
The project for establishing a plantation at Delaware
Bay was never carried into execution ; but the agitation
of it for fourteen years not only evinces great interest
200 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
in that particular region, springing out of and nurtured
by the voyages of New Haven merchants, but illustrates
the extent to which the commercial spirit ruled in New
Haven. It shows us a people, who, having become sat-
isfied that they could never in their present home see
their wishes fulfilled, were looking for new shores,
where, "foundations being laid as here, and govern-
ment so carried on," the younger plantation might be-
come "the greater part of the jurisdiction."
It is not impertinent here to obser\'e that during this
agitation of the people of New Haven about a removal
to Delaware, two attempts were made by Cromwell to
divert their attention to other places. Hutchinson
says, " Cromwell had been very desirous of drawing off
the New Englanders to people Ireland after his suc-
cesses there ; and the inhabitants of New Haven had
serious thoughts of removing, but did not carry their
design into execution." In another place he says, of
the New Haven people, "They had offers from Ireland
after the wars were over, and were in treaty for the
purchase of lands there for a small distinct province by
themselves." Mather says, "They entered into some
treaties about the city of Galway, which they were to
have had as a small province to themselves." If any
formal action was taken at New Haven on the proposal
of Cromwell, it was probably taken by the jurisdiction,
whose records from 1644 to 1653 have been lost.' Five
years afterward the Lord Protector, having taken the
' In Ellis's Collection of Original Letters Illustrative of English His-
tory is a letter of certain ministers and others in New England replying to
and entertaining Cromwell's proposal. None of the signers are New
Haven men. Its date is Dec. 31, 1650.
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 201
island of Jamaica from the Spaniards, offered a portion
of it to the people of New Haven. A letter of instruc-
tions for Daniel Gookin, bound for New England, is still
extant in the State Paper Office at London, dated
Sept. 26, 1655. According to the epitome prepared for
the calendar published by authority, he is instructed : —
" To acquaint the governors and inhabitants in New England
that the English army took possession of Jamaica on the loth of
May last : to describe the situation and goodness of the island, the
plenty of horses and cattle, and the convenience of the harbors,
which are now being fortified by the English : that there are about
seven thousand well armed men there, besides eight hunded more
lately sent over with Major Robert Sedgwick, a commissioner in
the civil affairs of the island ; and that it is intended to defend the
place against all attempts, and to have a good fleet always in those
seas : to offer to the people of New England to remove to Jamaica,
in convenient numbers, for certain specified reasons, viz., to en-
lighten those parts (a chief end of our undertaking the design) by
people who know and fear the Lord, and that those of New England,
driven from the land of their nativity into that desert and barren
wilderness for conscience' sake, may remove to a land of plenty :
to make these propositions to the people of New Haven, who have
thoughts of removing to Delaware Bay, viz., that a part of the
island next to some good harbor will be granted to them and their
heirs forever without payment of rent for seven years, and then one
penny an acre ; their goods of the growth and manufacture of the
island shall be three years free from customs ; one of their number
to be from time to time appointed governor and commander-in-chief,
with persons to assist in the management of affairs ; six ships will
be sent for their transportation ; twenty acres granted to every male
above twelve years old, and ten to every other male or female, six
weeks after the agreement is concluded ; the whole number of
males to be transported within two years."
It does not appear from the records whether the pro-
ject of removing to Delaware Bay had been abandoned
202 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
before this offer of -Cromwell reached New Haven, or
whether it gave place to his proposal of Jamaica ; but
his offer was at first favorably entertained. When it
had been before the people for consideration about three
weeks, the governor desiring the town at a meeting
held May 19, 1656, to give an answer: —
" Lieut. John Nash spoke what he conceived to be the mind
of the generality of the town, viz., That they conceive it is a work of
God, and that it should be encouraged, and if they, see meet per-
sons go before them, that is, engage in the design to go with them,
or quickly after, fit to carry on the work of Christ in commonwealth
and also in church afEairs, they are free, and will attend' the
providence of God in it : provided that they have further encourage-
ment, both of the healthf ulness of the place and a prosperous going
on of the war, that other places thereabouts be taken, with what
also Richard Miles may bring from Capt. Martin. And that this
i*'as the town's mind, they all declared by vote."
On the 28th of the same month the matter was
brought before the General Court for the jurisdiction,
where a copy of the instructions given by his Highness
the Lord Protector to Capt. Gookin was read, with
letters from Capt. Gookin and letters from Major Sedg-
wick from Jamaica, and the intelligence which Richard
Miles (who by this time had arrived home) "brought
from Capt. Martin, to whom he was sent to inquire."
" The deputies from the several plantations were desired
to let the Court understand what is the mind of their
towns in this business." " Much debate there was about
this thing, and a serious weighing and considering
thereof." The proposal received less favor in this
assembly than it had in the town-meeting at New Haven.
Perhaps the other plantations, where husbandry was the
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 203
principal occupation, did not feel so much need of a
change as New Haven felt : perhaps the intelligence
which Deacon Miles brought, had affected unfavorably
even the New Haven people. The conclusion to which
the General Court of the jurisdiction came was :
" Though they cannot but acknowledge the great love,
care, and tender respect of his Highness the Lord Pro-
tector to New England in general, and to this colony
in particular, yet for divers reasons they cannot conclude
that God calls them to a present remove.*'
The disposition to find a place more favorably situated
for commerce, seems from this time to have yielded to
a purpose to make the best of the opportunities afforded
by New Haven, and to a willingness so to modify the
original intention of the planters that the town should
be less dependent on commerce, and give more attention
to agriculture, than was at first expected.
In the attempt to write the history of commerce with
Delaware Bay, we have been led into a history of the
efforts to connect with that commerce the establish-
ment there, of a plantation under the New Haven
colonial government. Such a relation is, however,
pertinent to the subject, for these efforts grew out of
the commerce which New Haven merchants prosecuted
between the two places.
Of the commerce itself there is much less to record
than we have written of these futile attempts to estab-
lish at Delaware Bay the jurisdiction of New Haven
and of England. The traffic was carried on by a cor-
poration which owned two large tracts of land lying —
one on each side of the bay — above the Swedish forts.
On one of these parcels of land was a trading-house
204 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
where agents of the company remained to traffic with
the Indians, and collect beaver and other pelts to be
sent home by the vessels which from time to time
came into the bay.
In their traffic with Virginia the New Haven mer
chants traded with the English planters, and not with
the aborigines as at Delaware. Tobacco was the
staple export of Virginia, but they brought away in
addition, store of beaver which the planters had pur-
chased of the Indians. In exchange for these commodi-
ties they left with the Virginians supplies brought from
England and from Barbadoes, as well as from home.
The following extract from the record of a general
court for the jurisdiction is illustrative: —
"Mr. Allerton, Ensign Bryan, and Mr. Augur appeared and
kiformed the court, that, by reason of bad biscuit and flour they
have had from James Rogers of Milford, they have suffered much
damage, and likewise the place lies under reproach at Virginia and
Barbadoes, so as when other men from other places can have a
ready market for their goods, that from hence lies by and will not
sell, or if it do, it is for little above half so much as others sell for ;
they desire, therefore, that some course may be taken to remedy this
grievance. The court approved of their proposition, and thought
it a thing very just and necessary to be done, and sent for the baker
and miller from Milford, who also appeared, and, after some debate,
did confess there had been formerly some miscarriages. The baker
imputed it, or a great part of it, to the miller^s grinding his com so
badly, which the miller now acknowledgeth might be through want
of skill, but he hopes now it is and will be better, which the baker
owned ; and, as Mr. Allerton now informed his bread is at present
better, after much debate about this business, James Rogers was
told, that if, after this warning, his flour or bread prove bad, he
must expect that the damage will fall upon him, unless it may be
proved that the defectiveness of it came by some other means."
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. 205
The first mention of commerce between New Haven
and Barbadoes occurs in a letter written by Deputy-
Gov. Goodyear, advising Gov. Stuyvesant of the deliv-
ery of beef, which Goodyear had contracted to deliver
upon demand, probably in payment for the ship which
the Dutch governor had sent to him at New Haven.
The Dutch commissary having come for the beef at
a time inopportune for Goodyear, the latter writes :
"I was necessitated to furnish a great part out of
what I had provided for the Barbadoes ; but my en-
deavors are and shall be to my utmost to perform
my covenants in all things. I desire we may attend
peace and neighborly love and correspondency one
with another." This letter dated Nov. 22, 1647, must
have been written at a very early period in the his-
tory of the trade with Barbadoes ; for sugar, the prin-
cipal product of that island, began to be exported to
England in 1646. At a court held Dec. 7, 1647,
" Stephen Reekes, master of a vessel that came from
the Barbadoes, was called before the court to answer
for some miscarriages of his on the sabbath day,
viz. : that he, the said Stephen, did, contrary to the
law of God, and of this place, haul up his ship to or
towards the neck-bridge upon the sabbath, which is a
labor proper for the six days, and not to be under-
taken on the Lord's day." As Mr. Reekes was ex-
cused on the ground that he was a stranger, and **did
not do it out of contempt but ignorantly," it is evi-
dent that vessels not owned in New Haven partici-
pated thus early in transporting hither the products of
Barbadoes. In 1651 Mr. Goodyear sold Shelter Island,
which he had owned about ten years, for " sixteen hun-
206 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
dred pounds of good, merchantable, muscovado sugar.*
One of the purchasers certainly was a resident of Bar
badoes, and apparently two others ; so that it may be
presumed that the sugar was delivered in the West
Indies, and brought away by Goodyear in his own ship.
To illustrate further the use made of this product of
Barbadoes as a medium of exchange, reference is made
to the fact already mentioned, that Lieut. Budd sold his
house in New Haven for a hogshead of sugar.
A more interesting illustration is that which Dr.
Bacon thus records in his Historical Discourses : " In
the year 1665, on the day of the anniversary thanks-
giving, a contribution was 'given in' for *the saints
that were in want in England.' This was at the time
when, in that country, so many ministers, ejected from
their places of settlement, were, by a succession of
enactments, studiously cut off from all means of obtain-
ing bread for themselves, their wives, and their chil-
dren. The contribution was made, as almost all pay-
ments of debts or of taxes were made at that period, in
grain and other commodities ; there being no money in
circulation, and no banks by which credit could be con-
verted into currency. It was paid over to the deacons
in the February following. We, to whom it is so easy,
in the present state of commerce, to reniit the value of
any contribution to almost any part of the world, can-
not easily imagine the circuitous process by which that
contribution reached the 'poor saints' whom it was
intended to relieve. By the deacons, the articles con-
tributed were probably first exchanged to some extent
' "Muscovado, The name given to unrefined or moist sugar." —
Brandt V Dictionary,
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 20/
for Other commodities more suitable for exportation.
Then, the amount was sent to Barbadoes, with which
island the merchants of this place had intercourse,
and was exchanged for sugars, which were thence sent
to England, to the care of four individuals, two of whom
were Mr. Hooke the former teacher, and Mr. Newman
the ruling elder, of this church. In 1671 Mr. Hooke,
in a letter to the church, said, * Mr. Caryl, Mr. Barker,
Mr. Newman, and myself have received sugars from
Barbadoes to the value of about ninety pounds, and
have disposed of it to several poor ministers, and min-
isters' widows. And this fruit of your bounty is very
thankfully received and acknowledged by us.' "
Commerce between New Haven and the mother-
country was chiefly carried on by way of Boston and
Barbadoes. Bills of exchange on London were pur-
chased with beaver-skins and. other products of New
England exported from Boston, or with sugar pro-
cured by barter in Barbadoes. The funds thus ob-
tained were invested in English goods, sometimes by
the New Haven merchants in person when visiting
their native land, but usually by their correspondents
residing in London. These English goods were sent
out in the ships which sailed every spring for Massa-
chusetts Bay, and at Boston were re-shipped to New
Haven.
Allusion has been made to three vessels, which in
1639 came to New Haven direct from England. We
have now to speak of an attempt made at New Haven
to establish at a later date a direct trade with the
mother-country. Such an achievement was regarded as
208 HISTORY OF XEIV HAVEN COLOXY,
beyond the ability of any individual, and yet so desira-
ble as to demand a general combination of effort. A
company was formed, in which apparently all who were
able to help, took more or less stock. This company,
called " The Ship Fellowship," bought or built a ship
which they made ready for sea in January, 1646.
She was chartered for a voyage to London, by another
association called "The Company of Merchants of
New Haven." The feoffees of the ship-fellowship
were " Mr. Wakeman, Mr. Atwater, Mr. Crane, and
Goodman Miles." The company of merchants con-
sisted of " Mr. Theophilus Eaton ( now governor ), Mr.
Stephen Goodyear, Mr. Richard Malbon, and Mr.
Thomas Gregson." Winthrop says, "She was laden
with pease and some wheat, all in bulk, with about
two hundred West India hides, and store of beaver and
plate, so as it was estimated in all at five thousand
pounds." Seventy persons embarked in her, some of
whom were counted among the most valued inhabitants
of New Haven. Dr. Bacon has graphically depicted
the departure of the vessel, and the solicitude felt for
her safety by those whom she left behind. " In the
month of January, 1646, the harbor being frozen over,
a passage is cut through the ice, with saws, for three
miles ; and * the great ship ' on which so much de-
pends is out upon the waters and ready to begin her
voyage. Mr. Davenport and a great company of the
people go out upon the ice, to give the last farewell
to their friends. The pastor in solemn prayer com-
mends them to the protection of God, and they depart.
The winter passes away ; the ice-bound harbor breaks
into ripples before the soft breezes of the spring.
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. 2O9
Vessels from England arrive on the coast ; but they
bring no tidings of the New Haven ship. Vain is the
solicitude of wives and children, of kindred and friends.
Vain are all inquiries.
*They ask the waves, and ask the felon winds,
And question every gust of rugged wings *
That blows from off each beaked promontory.'
" Month after month, hope waits for tidings. Affec-
tion, unwilling to believe the worst, frames one con-
jecture and another to account for the delay. Perhaps
they have been blown out of their track upon some
undiscovered shore, from which they will by and by
return, to surprise us with their safety : perhaps they
have been captured, and are now in confinement.
How many prayers are offered for the return of that
ship, with its priceless treasures of life and affection !
At last anxiety gradually settles down into despair.
Gradually they learn to speak of the wise and public-
spirited Gregson, the brave and soldier-like Turner,
the adventurous Lamberton, that * right godly woman '
the wife of Mr. Goodyear, and the others, as friends
whose faces are never more to be seen among the
living. In November, 1647, their estates are settled,
and they are put upon record as deceased." '
Besides its commerce with the places which have
been indicated. New Haven made occasional ventures
out of the usual channels, as opportunity offered.
Boston had considerable trade with the Canary Islands,
' Of this ship, and of the strange atmospheric phenomenon which the
people of New Haven regarded as a miraculous tableau of her fate, some
fuither account may be found in Appendix III.
2IO HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
■
and Winthrop has put on record an attempt which New
Haven made to share in it. We copy from his journal
under the date of July 2, 1643 • —
" Here arrived one Mr. Carman, master of the ship called
(blankX of one hundred and eighty tons. He went from New
Haven in December last, laden with clapboards for the Canaries,
being earnestly commended to the Lord's protection by the church
there. At the island of Palma he was set upon by a Turkish
pirate of three hundred tons, twenty-six pieces of ordnance, and
two hundred men. He fought with her three hours, having but
twenty men and but seven pieces of ordnance that he could use,
and his muskets were unserviceable with rust. The Turk lay
across his hawse, so as he was forced to shoot through his own
hoodings, and by these shot killed many Turks. Then the Turk
lay by his side, and boarded him with near one hundred men, and
cut all his ropes, &c. ; but his shot having killed the captain of the
Turkish ship, and broken her tiller, the Turk took in his o^'n
ensign, and fell off from him, but in such haste as he left about
fifty of his men aboard him. Then the master and some of his
men came up, and fought with those fifty, hand to hand, and slew
so many of them as the rest leaped overboard. The master had
many wounds on his head and body, and divers of his men were
wounded, yet but one slain. So with much difficulty he got to the
island (being in view thereof), where he was very courteously
entertained, and supplied with whatever he wanted.**
Besides merchants engaged in coasting and foreign
trade, there were shopkeepers in New Haven who kept
for sale an assortment of such goods as were required
by the people of the town and of the other plantations.
One of these was a widow named Stolyon, living in the
Herefordshire quarter, in a house which Richard Piatt
of Milford built and still continued to own. A disagree-
ment between her and Capt. Turner concerning a bar-
gain in which he was to buy cloth of her, and she to buy
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. 211
COWS of him, served to put on record specifications in a
charge of extortion, from which one may glean some
knowledge of prices, and of the methods in which
trade was carried on : —
" I. The captain complained that she sold some cloth to William
Bradley, at 20 shillings per yard, that cost her about 12 shillings, for
which she received wheat at 3 shillings 6 pence per bushel, and
sold it presently to the baker at 5 shillings per bushel, who received
it of William Bradley, only she forbearing her money six months.
2. That the cloth which Lieutenant Seeley bought of her for 20
shillings per yard last year, she hath sold this year for seven
bushels of wheat a yard, to be delivered in her chamber, which she
confest. 3. That she would not take wampum for commodities at
six a penny, though it were the same she had paid to others at six,
but she would have seven a penny. Thomas Robinson testified
that his wife gave her 8 pence in wampum at seven a penny,
though she had but newly received the same wampum of Mrs.
Stolyon at six. 4. That she sold primers at 9 pence apiece
which cost but 4 pence here in New England. 5. That she would
not take beaver which was merchantable with others, at 8 shillings
a pound, but she said she would have it at 7 shillings, and well
dried in the sun or in an oven. Lieutenant Seeley, the marshal,
and Isaac Mould testified it. John Dillingham by that means lost
5 shillings in a skin (that cost him 20 shillings of Mr. Evance, and
sold to her), viz., 2 shillings 6 pence in the weight and 2 shillings
6 pence in the price. 6. She sold a piece of cloth to the two
Mecars at 23 shillings 4 pence per yard in wampum : the cloth
cost her about 12 shillings per yard, and sold when wampum was
in great request. 7. That she sold a yard of the same cloth to a
man of Connecticut at 22 shillings per yard, to be delivered in
Indian corn at 2 shillings per bushel at home. 8. She sold Eng-
lish mohair at 6 shillings per yard, which Mr. Goodyear and Mr.
Atwater afiirmed might be bought in England for 3 shillings 2
pence per yard at the utmost. 9. She sold thread after the rate
of 12 shillings per pound, which cost not above 2 shillings 2 pence
in Old England. 10. That she sold needles at one a penny which
might be bought in Old England at 12 pence or 18 pence per hun-
dred, as Mr. Francis Newman aflfirmeth."
2 1 2 HISTOR Y OF NE IV HA I 'EN COL ONY,
These specifications will give the reader some idea
not only of prices, but of that scarcity of money which
the records everywhere make apparent. Dr. Bacon
has taken notice of the fact that when Gov. Eaton
died, "the richest man in New Haven, with something
like seven hundred dollars' worth of plate in his house,
had only about ten dollars in money." The inventories
of the time seldom mentioned gold or silver coin.
Rates were collected in wheat, rye, pease, or maize,
at a price fixed by the court. These grains and beaver-
skins, being always marketable, were much used in
trade. Wampum, or Indian money, consisted, says
Trumbull, of "small beads, most curiously wrought
out of shells, and perforated in the centre, so that
they might be strung on belts, in chains and brace-
lets. These were of several sorts. The Indians in
Connecticut, and in New England in general, made
black, blue, and white w^ampum. Six of the white
beads passed for a penny, and three of the black or
blue for the same." In December, 1645, "i^ ^'^s
ordered that wampum shall go for current pay in this
plantation in any payment under twenty shillings, if
half be black and half be white ; and, in case any
question shall arise about the badness of any wam-
pum, Mr. Goodyear shall judge if they repair to
him." The scarcity of money naturally occasioned
much use of credit ; the probate-records showing lists
of small debts, some of them less than a shilling,
due to and by the estate inventoried. The town-
records also bear witness to the same fact, allow-
ing us to see that when A owed B, and B owed C,
arrangements were made for A to deliver to C some
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 213
commodity which he required, and thus to cancel both
debts.
Although the leading planters of Quinnipiac relied
on commerce as the chief means of prosperity to
themselves and to their town, they all engaged from
the first to some extent in husbandry. As the years
advanced, and they found themselves disappointed in
their town as a seat of commerce, and unable to
remove to a place more opportune to their pursuits,
they set a relatively greater, if not an absolutely
greater, value on husbandry. For the first year or
two, tillage was confined to the home-lots ; then it
was extended to the fields in the first division of.
upland. Afterward farmsteads were established in the
second division ; some occupied by the owners them-
selves, and some by tenants, or by bailiffs as agents
for the proprietors. At East Farms, a neighborhood
on the west side of the Quinnipiac, were the allot-
ments of David Atwater, Nathanael Turner, William
Potter, Richard Mansfield, Francis Brewster, and Gov.
Eaton. The governor had another farm at Stoney
River, in East Haven, consisting of fifty acres of
meadow, **with upland answering that proportion.'* Mr.
Brewster must also have had land of the second
division elsewhere than at East Farms, as that farm
contained only one hundred and fifty-four acres of
upland, and thirty-three of meadow. This land of Mr.
Brewster soon passed into the possession of William
Bradley ; and Gov. Eaton's farm, "by the brick-kilns,"
was, by his children, transferred to their half-brother,
Thomas Yale. The four families of Atwater, Turner,
214 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Potter, and Mansfield have never entirely disappeared
from that neighborhood. Mr. Davenport's farm was
on the opposite side of the Quinnipiac. A portion
of it remained in his family for six generations.^
Mr. Gregson had a farm in East Haven, near Morris
Cove, or, as it was then called, Solitary Cove. Dodd
says, in his East Haven Register, that Gregson placed
his family there before embarking for England in " the
great ship ; " but there i^ no sufficient evidence that
the family vacated their stately house in the town,
or that Gregson ever intended to give to the culti-
vation of the farm his personal attention. Mr. Good-
year's farm was north of the town, and in the neigh-
borhood of Pine Rock.
The planters brought with them, or procured from
Massachusetts, plants and seeds which soon yielded
the vegetables and fruits they had been accustomed to
enjoy in England. On the first day of July, 1640, a
naughty boy was, by order of the court, " whipped for
running from his master, and stealing fruit out of
Goodman Ward's lot or garden." Goodman Ward
must have given early attention to the planting of his
currant-bushes, to have fruit in the third summer of the
plantation's history. The English grains, especially
wheat, rye, and pease, were sown, and seem to have
rewarded the labor of the husbandman more bountifully
than in our time, producing a supply for the home
' A diagram of Mr. Davenport's farm, as surveyed by Mark Pearcc in
1646, may be seen in the Town Records, Vol. III. p. 296. "The general
total of the lands belonging to this farm is seven hundred eighty-three
acres and two rods." The diagram and survey were recorded by Rev.
John Davenport of Stamford, grandson of Rev. John Davenport of New
Haven.
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 21$
market, and some surplus for export. From the
aborigines the English learned to plant Indian corn,
and to stimulate its growth with fish. Cattle — such
as swine, goats, oxen, and horses — were suffered to
pasture on unenclosed lands, ^nd increased in number
from year to year. Cows — when the public cow-
pasture did not furnish sufficient grass — were driven
abroad under the care of herdsmen, whose active aid
they sometimes needed in leaving the soft, treacher-
ous swamps where the feed was most luxuriant.
In the other plantations of the jurisdiction, husbandry
occupied the time and attention of a much larger part
of the people than at New Haven. At Milford, a few
planters were engaged in commerce ; and some who
were artisans worked at their trades, but the population
was not sufficiently numerous to support many kinds
of handicraft. Guilford was even more closely limited
to tillage as an occupation. In consequence of the de-
cision of Thomas Nash to settle at New Haven, serious
inconvenience was experienced for want of a smith, till,
in 1652, Thomas Smith came from Fairfield, on the in-
vitation of the planters, who gave him a considerable
tract of land, "on condition of serving the town in the
trade of a smith, upon just and moderate terms, for
the space of five years."
The annals of husbandry are not eventful, and the
records afford but little information upon that subject
which would interest the general reader. There were
pounds and pound-keepers, defective fences, unruly
cattle, fines, and awards for damages. We read in
the town-records of New Haven : " It is ordered, that,
for what blackbirds John Brocket or others kill, he or
2l6 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLONY,
they applying themselves thereto shall receive from the
treasurer after the rate of ten shillings a thousand.**
At first a considerable bounty was offered for heads of
foxes and wolves ; but in 1645, "the court, being in-
formed that no man attends this service as his employ-
ment and business, but improves opportunity as he
finds it occasionally, ordered that the treasurer hence-
forward pay only two pounds of powder and four pounds
of bullets or shot, or the value thereof, for every wolfs
head, and one shilling for every old fox*s head, and six-
pence for every young one, to such of this plantation
as within New Haven limits kill and so bring them.*'
The great variety of useful arts practised in New
Haven obviated, in some degree, the inconvenience
which the smaller plantations in the neighborhood
must otherwise have experienced. Few instances
occur in the history of colonization, where within ten
years from the commencement there was such fulness
of equipment for producing at home the requirements
of civilized life, as at New Haven. The records do not
enable us to make a complete list of its artisans, or of
the crafts at which they wrought, and the writer has
never made a systematic attempt to collect the names
of such trades as are incidentally mentioned ; but these
are some which he has remembered, or with but little
search has collected : viz., sawyers, carpenters, ship-
carpenters, joiners, thatchers, chimney-sweepers, brick-
makers, bricklayers, plasterers, tanners, shoemakers, sad-
dlers, weavers, tailors, hatters, blacksmiths, gunsmiths,
cutlers, nailers, millers, bakers, coopers, and potters. Of
these handicrafts some are so nearly related that a work-
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 21/
man easily passed from one to another. Accordingly we
find the same person appearing as a carpenter, a ship-
carpenter, and a joiner ; and his neighbor described at
one time as a shoemaker, and at another as a tanner.
So that, with more than the usual variety of a new
settlement, there was something of the versatility com-
monly developed by emigration.
We have already had occasion to speak of the now
obsolete handicraft by which logs were sawn into the
boards and planks necessary for the buildings and
palings of the planters. It may seem to us a slow
process ; but, as sawmills had not at that time been
introduced into the mother-country, it did not seem
so to them. " The first recorded attempt to establish
a sawmill in Great Britain was made near London, in
1663, by a Dutchman, in whose native country they
had long been in use ; but the enterprise was abandoned
on account of the opposition of hand-sawyers." ' A
tree having been felled and cross-cut, one of the logs
was rolled upon a frame over a pit. Then, the master-
workman or " top-man" standing above to guide the
work, and the " pit-man" or assistant standing beneath,
they pulled the saw up and down, — briskly if at work
by the piece, patiently if by the day. The maximum
price of sawing by the hundred, as determined by the
General Court in 1640, being four and sixpence for
boards, five shillings for planks, and five and sixpence
for slit work, and the wages of the two men who
wrought at a saw-pit amounting, according to the
same tariff, to four and sixpence for a day's work, we
may conclude that at least one hundred feet of lumber
was produced per day by each pair of workmen.
* Appleton*s New American Cyclopaedia, art. " Saw."
2l8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The trade of carpentery had many followers in a place
where dwellings were to be erected within a short period
for more than a hundred families. William Andrews
appears to have stood at the head of this guild. He
contracted in 1639 ^^ build the meeting-house, but let
out some parts of the work to Thomas Munson and
Jarvis Boykin, who, with the consent of Andrews,
transferred some part of their contract to Thomas
Saul and William Gibbons. The two carpenters last
named did not fulfil their engagement "to make the
roof of the tower and turret tight, to keep out wet,"
and were probably absent, at least temporarily, when
the defect was discovered ; for a question arose between
Andrews and the two who had contracted with him,
which party should make the work good. "Because
there was a defect of testimony on all sides, the
Court advised them to consult together, and do it
amongst them, so as the meeting-house may be kept
dry without delay." The name of Thomas Saul does
not appear after this transaction, but William Gibbons
was some years later a resident of the town. The
meeting-house needing further repairs a few years
afterward, a large committee of carpenters was ap-
pointed to "consider whether the house may stay
safely another year without repairs ; if not, then how
it may be best done for most safety to the town, and
least charge ; also, whether the tower and turret may
safely stand, and will not in a short time decay the
house ; and, if taken down, then what will be the
charge of that, and to make the roof tight and comely
again." The committee consisted of William Andrews,'
Thomas Munson, Jarvis Boykin, John Bassett, Robert
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. 219
Bassett, George Larrymore, Jonathan Marsh, and
Thomas Morris. These were, doubtless, master-work-
men, having under them journeymen and apprentices.
The last named wrought as a ship-carpenter, but his
appointment on this committee indicates that he did
not confine himself to ship-building.
Some of the ship-carpenters in the plantation, besides
Morris, were James Russell, William Russell, George
Ward, Lawrence Ward, and Daniel Paul. The build-
ing of a ship of large size brought in workmen from
other colonies. It is impossible to determine conclu-
sively whether the New Haven artisans were responsi-
ble for the fatal crankness which Winthrop attributes
to the vessel in which so many of their townsmen lost
their lives in 1646. Rev. James Pierpont, in his letter
to Mather, testifies that she was built in Rhode Island,
and nothing appears to invalidate his testimony. The
only occasion for doubt is found in the improbability
that the feoffees would purchase rather than build ; but
perhaps the business required a ship sooner than one
could be produced in a port where nothing larger than
a shallop or a pinnace had ever been launched. If
Pierpont was correct in his apprehension that she came
from Rhode Island, the first large ship was built at
New Haven immediately after the Rhode Island vessel
sailed, and by the same "ship-fellowship " to which that
vessel belonged. In August, 1646, one of the feoffees
desired the justice of the court about some nails that
a workman had stolen from the ship. In October "it
was propounded that help might be afforded to launch
the ship, for Goodman Paul informed the governor that
the keel would rot if it were not launched before winter.
220 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Brother Leeke had liberty to draw wine for them that
work at the ship." In the following January there was
a lawsuit in which the plaintiff, accounting for the
fact that Sergt. Jeffrey did not go as master of a
shallop on " a voyage to Guilford, Saybrook, and back
to New Haven," affirmed that " Mr. Crane, Mr. Wake-
man, and Mr. Atwater, intrusted as feoffees for the
building of a ship at New Haven^ desired Sergeant Jef-
frey might be spared to go to the Massachusetts about
rigging and other occasions concerning the said ship."
In 1648 another vessel was built at New Haven, and
the interest felt in it was so general that one can hardly
believe it was the adventure of an individual ; though
there is no definite information that it belonged to the
ship-fellowship whose feoffees had purchased a vessel in
Rhode Island, and in 1646 were building one at New
Haven.
The production of leather and the manufacture of
shoes increased so rapidly, that, within nine years after
the commencement of the plantation at New Haven,
shoes were made for exportation. At first the tanners
spoiled many hides through ignorance, as they alleged,
of the tan of the country ; but, even after they had pro-
fessedly acquired skill in the use of the native bark,
poor leather was sometimes produced. There was a
lawsuit in 1647, ^"^ which John Meigs, a shoemaker,
sued Henry Grcgorj'^ of the same trade for damage
suffered from the unworkmanlike manner in which
thirteen dozen pairs of shoes had been made. It ap-
pears that Meigs furnished the leather and the thread,
and carried them to Gregory "ready cut out," agreeing
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 221
to pay him one shilling per pair for making them. Abun-
dant testimony was borne by persons who had bought
some of the shoes, that they were worthless, coming to
pieces in a few days. But some testifying that the
leather tore, and others that the seams ripped, the
Court referred the matter to a committee of shoemakers
and tanners, who reported as follows : —
" We apprehend this : that the leather is very bad, not tanned,
nor fit to be sold for senriceable leather ; but it wrongs the coun-
try, nor can a man make good work of a great deal of it. And we
find the workmanship bad also : First, there is not sufficient stu£E
put in the thread, and instead of hemp it is flax, and the stitches
are too long, and the threads not drawn home, and there wants
wax on the thread, and the awl is too big for the thread. We
ordinarily put in seven threads, and here is but five ; so that, ac-
cording to our best light, we lay the cause both upon the work-
manship and the badness of the leather.
" Goodman Gregory, upon this testimony, seemed to be con-
vinced that he had not done his part, but then laid the fault on
Goodman Meigs, that he was the more slight in it through his
encouragement, who said to him, 'Flap them up: they are to go
far enough.' In this statement he was confirmed by two witnesses,
who had heard Meigs say to him, *Flap them up together; they
are to go far enough.* "
Goodman Meigs being called to propound his dam-
age, instanced five particulars: ist, damage to his
name ; 2d, damage to Mr. Evance, to whom he had en-
gaged himself to supply him with these goods for
exportation to the value of thirty pounds sterling ; 3d,
damage in having his wares turned back upon his
hands, Mr. Evance having refused to accept them ; 4th,
hinderance in his trade, people having on account of
these shoes shunned to buy any wares of him ; Sth,
money paid several men for satisfaction.
222 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" The plaintiff and defendant professing, upon the Court's de-
mand, that they had no more to say, and the Court considering the
case as it had been presented, debated, and proved, found them
both faulty. Goodman Gregory had transgressed rules of right-
eousness, both in reference to the country and to Goodman Meigs,
though his fault to Goodman Meigs is the more excusable because
of that encouragement Goodman Meigs gave him to be slight in
his workmanship ; though he should not have taken any encour-
agement to do evil, and should have complained to some magis-
trate, and not have wrought such leather in such a manner into
shoes, by which the country, or whosoever wears them, must be
deceived. But the greater fault and guilt lies up6n John Meigs
for putting such untanned, homy, unserviceable leather into shoes,
and for encouraging Goodman Gregory to slight workmanship
upon a motive that the shoes were to go far enough, as if rules of
righteousness reached not other places and countries.
"The Court proceeded to sentence, and ordered Goodman Meigs
to pay ten pounds as a fine to the jurisdiction, with satisfaction to
every particular person, as damage shall be required and proved.
And further, the Court ordered that none of the faulty shoes be
carried out of the jurisdiction to deceive men, the shoes deserving
rather to be burnt than sold, if there had been a law to that pur-
pose ; yet in the jurisdiction they may be sold, but then only as
deceitful ware, and the buyer may know them to be such. They or-
dered also Goodman Gregor\% for his slight, faulty workmanship
and fellowship in the deceit, to pay five pounds as a fine to the juris-
diction, and to pay the charges of the court, and that he require
nothing of Goodman Meigs for his loss of time in this w^ork,
whether it were more or less ; and the court thought themselves
called speedily and seriously to consider how these deceits may be
tor time to come prevented or duly punished."
If the contemporary records of the jurisdiction were
extant, we should probably find some legislation
prompted by this case. Allusion to such legislation is
made on the town-records a little later, when sealers
of leather were appointed, and sworn " to discharge the
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS, 223
trust committed to them in sealing leather according
to the Jurisdiction General Court's order." It was at
the same time ordered that calf-skins, deer-skins, and
goat-skins which are fully tanned should be sealed, and
shoemakers were allowed to use them for upper leather ;
but, as such shoes were inferior to those made of neat's
leather, "the court ordered that every shoemaker in
this town, mark all those shoes he makes of neat's
leather, before he sell them, with a N, — upon the lap
withinside, below the place where they be tied." "It
was propounded to the shoemakers, that, seeing hides
are now near as cheap as ordinarily they are in Eng-
land, shoes might be sold more reasonable than they
have been ; and the shoemakers promised they would
consider of it."
We have already seen that biscuit was shipped
to Virginia and the West Indies. But, according to
English usage, bread was made in the shop of the
baker for families in the town. It was of three grades :
the white loaf, the wheaten loaf, and the household
loaf. " Every person within this jurisdiction, who shall
bake bread for sale, shall have a distinct mark for
his bread, and keep the true assizes hereafter ex-
pressed and appointed." Then follows the assize fix-
ing the weight of a penny white loaf, a penny wheaten
loaf, and a penny household loaf respectively, when
the bushel of wheat is at three shillings, and dimin-
ishing the weight of the loaf as the price of wheat
increases. When a bushel of wheat cost three shil-
lings, which seems to have been regarded as a mini-
mum price, the weight of the penny white loaf was to be
224 HISTORY OF A'Eiy HAVEy COLOXY.
eleven and a quarter ounces ; the weight of the penny
wheatcn loaf, seventeen and a quarter ounces ; and the
weight of the penny household loaf, twenty-three
ounces. When wheat was at sLx shillings and sixpence
per bushel, which is the highest price named in the
tariff, the penny white loaf must weigh six ounces, the
penny wheat loaf nine and a half ounces, and the penny
household loaf twelve and a quarter ounces.
The inspector, having been sworn to the faithful dis-
charge of his office, " is hereby authorized to enter into
any house, either with the constable or marshal, or
without, where he understands that any bread is baked
for sale, and to weigh such bread as often as he seeth
cause ; and, after one notice or warning, to seize all
such bread as he findeth defective in weight, or not
marked according to this order. And all such forfeit-
ures shall be divided, one third to the officer for his
care and pains, and the rest to the poor of the place."
Iron-works were projected as early as 1665. John
Winthrop, jun., interested in mining, and Stephen Good-
year, interested in ever)' enterprise which promised to
be advantageous to New Haven, united in setting up a
bloomery and forge, at the outlet of Saltonstall Lake.
The people of New Haven favored the undertaking by
contributing labor in building a dam, and by conceding
the privilege of cutting on the common land all the
wood needed for making charcoal. They hoped that the
works would bring trade, and that Winthrop would fix
his residence in New Haven. The ore was transported
from North Haven, partly by boats down the Quinni-
piac and up Farm River, and partly by carts. After
INDUSTRIAL PURSUITS. 22$
two or three years, Goodyear having died, and Winthrop
having ceased to think of New Haven as a place of
residence, the works were leased to Capt. Clark and
Mr. Payne of Boston. Iron continued to ISe made for
some years, but the institution did not fulfil the hopes
of its projectors, or of the public.
CHAPTER XII.
RELIGION AND MORALS.
TWO classes of writers differing widely in their feel-
ings towards the Puritan emigrants who came to
New England resemble each other in manifesting a sin-
gular ignorance. The planters of New England never
were advocates of religious liberty ; and there is equal
sciolism in eulogizing them as such, and in criticising
them for inconsistency with their professions when they
expelled from their territor)' those who publicly dis-
sented from their religious opinions and from their forms
of worship. If the Puritans had been in power in Eng-
land, they would have suppressed the ritualism of Laud
as heartily as Laud punished non-conformity. Over-
powered in England, they came to America to find
freedom to worship according to their own consciences,
and not to establish religious liberty for all men of
every creed. The restrictions which had been placed
upon them, and the sufferings to which they had been
subjected in their native land, instead of leading them
to be tolerant of other forms of Christianity, ser\'ed
rather to render them more earnest to secure to them-
selves, and to those who should be like-minded, the
territory to which they had emigrated, and upon which
they were to expend their labors and their estates.
226
RELIGION AND MORALS. 22/
They saw no other way of securing the end for which
they had exiled themselves, than that of exclusiveness
and intolerance.
In accordance with such convictions and feelings,
the planters of the New Haven Colony not only estab-
lished, in the several plantations, churches such as
they approved, but took care that no other than " ap-
proved churches " should be gathered, and that, if they
should find it impossible to prevent the formation of
other churches, the members of them should have no
political power. It was ordered : —
" That all the people of God within this jurisdiction, who are
not in a church way, being orthodox in judgment, and not scandal-
ous in life, shall have full liberty to gather themselves into a church
estate, provided they do it in a Christian way, with due observation
of the rules of Christ, revealed in his Word ; provided also, that
this Court doth not, nor hereafter will, approve of any such com-
pany of persons, as shall join in any pretended way of church-
fellowship, unless they shall first, in due season, acquaint both the
magistrates and the elders of the churches within this colony, where
and when they intend to join, and have their approbation therein.
Nor shall any person, being a member of any church which shall
be gathered without such notice given and approbation had, or who
is not a member of some church in New England approved by the
magistrates and churches of this colony, be admitted to the freedom
of this jurisdiction."
It is not sufficient to say, that, according to the
theory and practice of the New Haven Colony, the
approved churches were established by law ; but, since
the seven men who were chosen to be the foundation
work covenanted together as a church before they
organized themselves as a civil court, it would be more
accurate to say that the civil authority was instituted
228 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
by the church, than that the church was established by
the state. This method of organization was undoubt-
edly designed to secure " the purity and peace of the
ordinances to themselves and their posterity;" that is,
to exclude, as far as they could, all other forms of
Christianity. Such was their design, whatever may be
the verdict of the present age respecting the breadth
of their scope, or the equilibrium of their justice. It
is easy to see that such a foundation could not, and
ought not to, endure through all the changes of opinion
introduced by their posterity and by later emigrants.
It is not easy to show that it was cither unrighteous
or impolitic as a temporar}' arrangement designed to
secure to exiles from their native land the peaceable
enjoyment of that " purity of the ordinances " for which
they had left their homes, and in regard to which they
were all of one mind.
The " approved churches " were of the Congregational
order, in distinction from Independency on the one hand
and from diocesan or presbyterial combination on the
other. Some of the planters were High Church Sepa-
ratists, regarding it as wrong to be in fellowship with
the Church of England. Those who were more liberal
had lost all desire for Episcopacy, if for no other reason
because it was for them impracticable. To organize
congregations, and place them under the government
of the English hierarchy, would have been a surrender
of themselves to the yoke they had slipped from.
However they differed one from another in their
theories of the church, the people of New England
had, before the settlement of New Haven, with one ac-
cord, practically renounced Episcopacy. The planters of
RELIGION AND MORALS, 229
Salem seem to have had no plan for their ecclesiastical
organization till the time for action was close at hand.
The adoption of Congregationalism was a surprise, at
least to some of them. A few expressed their dis-
sent by worshipping apart from the majority, and ac-
cording to the forms prescribed by act of Parliament.
After the violent suppression of this schism, there was
no attempt among the Puritans of New England to
organize congregations in connection with the Church
of England. Some of them, when they returned to
the mother country, showed by their adhesion to the
national church that they had not been Congrega-
tionalists through conviction that Episcopacy was un-
lawful. Others, on their return home, conscientiously
dissented from the established religion, and cast in their
lot with the Separatists, however feeble and despised.
Presbyterianism was but little known to most of
the planters of New Haven ; and what Davenport had
learned of it by his experience in Holland had led
him to dislike a classls almost as much as a bishop.
Adopting Congregationalism, the people of the New
Haven Colony, like their brethren throughout New
England, intended by it something as different from
Independency as from Presbyterianism or Episcopacy.
Their views and feelings may perhaps be illustrated by
a quotation from one of themselves better than in any
other way. John Wakeman, who resided at New Haven,
on a lot at the corner of Chapel and York Streets va-
cated by the removal to Milford of the widow Baldwin
to whom it was originally allotted, was for some years
the treasurer of the jurisdiction, the representative of
the plantation in the Colonial Court, and a deacon of the
230 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
church. Drawing near to the end of life, he felt him-
self called to profess his belief, not only in the facts
which underlie Christianity, but in that theory of the
Christian church which prevailed in New England. In
his last will and testament he writes, —
" I, John Wakeman of New Haven, being weak in body, but
of sound understanding and memory, in expectation of my great
change, do make this my last will and testament First, I com-
mend my soul into the hands of my Lord Jesus Christ, my Re-
deemer, trusting to be saved by his merits and intercession, and
my body to be buned at the discretion of my executors and friends,
in hope of a joyful resurrection; testifying my thankfulness to
God for the free manifestation of his grace to me in Christ, and
for the liberty and fellowship vouchsafed me with his people in his
ordinances in a Congregational way, which I take to be the way of
Christ, orderly walked in according to his rules ; but I do testify
against absolute independency of churches, and perfection of any
in light or actings, and against compulsion of conscience to concur
with the church without inward satisfaction to conscience, and per-
secuting such as dissent upon this ground, which I take to be an
abuse of the power given for edification by Christ, who is (the;
only lord of the conscience."
This profession of Mr. Wakeman agrees, for sub-
stance, with the doctrine concerning Congregational-
ism taught by the elders of the churches, and received
by the people. Even that part of it which relates to
freedom of conscience, and the abuse of power in per-
secuting, fairly represents the public sentiment of the
colony, so far as erroneous thinking, apart from the
promulgation of error, is concerned ; for, while banish-
ing or otherwise maltreating those who dissented from
the majority, the law-makers were careful to declare
that the offenders were not punished for wrong think-
RELIGION AND MORALS, 23 1
ing, but for "broaching, publishing, and maintaining"
their erroneous sentiments. The law against heresy
reads, —
"Although no creature be lord or have power over the faith and
consciences of men, nor may constrain them to believe or profess
against their consciences, yet to restrain or provide against such
as may bring in dangerous errors or heresies, tending to corrupt
and destroy the souls of men, it is ordered, That if any Christian
within this jurisdiction shall go about to subvert or destroy the
Christian faith or religion by broaching, publishing, or maintaining
any dangerous error or heresy, or shall endeavor to draw or seduce
others thereunto, every such person so offending, and continuing
obstinate therein, after due means of conviction, shall be fined,
banished, or otherwise severely punished, as the court of magis-
trates duly considering the offence, with the aggravating circum-
stances and danger like to ensue, shall judge meet."
Winthrop's journal affords a telling illustration of
the maintenance of this distinction in the neighbor-
ing colony of Massachusetts. Recording the punish-
ment of a Baptist, who was too poor to be fined, he
says, " He was ordered to be whipped, not for his
opinion, but for reproaching the Lord's ordinance, and
for his bold and evil behavior, both at home and in the
court." That the distinction was not merely theoretical,
is evident from the fact that many Baptists were un-
molested, among them the first two presidents of Har-
vard College. Dunster, the first president, was an
avowed anti-pedobaptist ; yet he held the office for
fourteen years, and might have held it longer had he
not, in a moment- of excitement, burst the bonds of
his usual discretion, and inveighed openly, in the
church at Cambridge, against infant baptism. For
232 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
this offence he was obliged to resign, but suffered no
further molestation. His successor, while approving
of infant baptism, held that immersion was the only
mode; and his peculiarity in this respect was known
before his election. "Mr. Mather and Mr. Norton
were desired by the overseers of the college to tender
unto Rev. Mr. Charles Chauncey the place of presi-
dent, with the stipend of one hundred pounds per
annum, to be paid out of the country treasury ; and
withal to signify to him that it is expected and desired
that he forbear to disseminate or publish any tenets
concerning- immersion in baptism, and celebration of
the Lord's Supper at evening, or to expose the re-
ceived doctrine therein." " Mr. Chauncey agreed to
this stipulation, and was never disturbed.
There were Baptists at New Haven, but no action
was taken against them by the civil authority. Per-
haps their immunity is sufficiently accounted for when
we learn that the wife of Gov. Eaton was one of them.
"The first discovery of her peremptory engagement was
by her departing from the assembly after the morning
sermon when the Lord's Supper was administered, and
the same afternoon, after sermon, when baptism was
administered, judging herself not capable of the former,
because she conceited herself to be not baptized, nor
durst she be present at the latter, imagining that paedo-
baptism is unlawful." Mr. Davenport, finding that
others of his flock were also astray, undertook to prove
in a sermon on the next Lord's Day that " baptism is
come in place of circumcision, and is to be adminis-
tered unto infants ; " which he himself says was done
' Mass. Hist. Coll., X., p. 175. Piercers History of Harvard College.
RELIGION AND MORALS, 233
" with a blessing from God for the recovery of some
from this error, and for the establishment of others in
truth. Only Mrs. Eaton [received] no benefit by all,
but continued as before." It is, however, more proba-
ble that the immunity was due to the discretion of the
dissenters, who did not attempt, so far as appears, to
make proselytes. That there was some jocose talk
about banishment, as if such a penalty might follow
the dissemination of their opinions, appears in the trial
of Mrs. Brewster for sundry vituperative speeches con-
cerning the church, its pastor, and the magistrates. A
maid testified that " she heard Mrs. Brewster, speaking
aloud to Mrs. Eaton concerning banishment, say, they
could not banish her but by a general court, and, if it
come to that, she wished Mrs. Eaton to come to her
and acquaint her with her judgment and grounds about
baptizing, and she would by them seduce some other
women, and then she, the said Mrs. Brewster, would
complain to the court of Mrs. Eaton, and the other
women should complain of her, as being thus seduced,
and so they would be banished together, and she spoke
of going to Rhode Island. Mrs. Brewster confesseth
the charge, but saith she spoke in jest and laughing."'
' The action of the church. in reference to Mrs. Eaton may be seen in
the Appendix to Bacon's Historical Discourses.
The pastor, finding that she had received no benefit from his sermon,
put himself " to a further task for her good," writing a treatise which was
read to her in private. This effort, however, was as fruitless as the
former. What course the church might have taken with her for what
they regarded as the error of her judgment, or for turning her back on its
ordinances, does not appear ; for, at this stage of the proceedings, " divers
rumors were spread up and down the town of her scandalous walking in
her family." " Upon inquiry, it appeared the reports w^ere true, and more
evils were discovered than we had heard of. We now began to see that
234 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
While the few Baptists in the colony were quiet
in their dissent, the Quakers were more troublesome.
The first to appear was Humphrey Norton, who, hav-
ing been banished from Plymouth, came to Southold,
whence, within six months after his banishment from
Plymouth, he was sent as a prisoner to New Haven.
This was in 1658. It is an illustration of the prevalent
neglect to distinguish between the jurisdiction court
and the court of the principal plantation, that he was
indicted before the plantation court of New Haven.
Mr. Leete of Guilford and Mr. Fenn of Milford were,
indeed, called in to assist ; and the proceedings were
afterward read to, and approved by, the court of the
jurisdiction. The charges against Norton were : —
^ I. That he hath grievously and in manifold wise traduced,
slandered, and reproached Mr. Youngs, pastor of the church at
Southold, in his good name, and the honor due to him for his
work's sake, together with his ministry, and all our ministers and
ordinances.
^ 2, That he hath endeavored to seduce the people from their
God took us off from treating with her any further about the error of her
judgment till we might help forward by the will of God her repentance
for those evils in life, believing that else these evils would by the just
judgment of God hinder from receiving light** Seventeen specifications
of " scandalous walking " were presented to the church ; the first charging
her with striking her mother-in-law, the second ^ith an assault upon her
step-daughter, and all showing a violent, ungovemed temper. After
waiting nine months for satisfaction, ** with much grief of heart and many
tears the church proceeded to censure,'* cutting her off from its com-
munion.
The conduct of Mrs. Elaton was so strange as to suggest the conjecture
that she was either insane, or in that state of ner\'ous excitement which
borders on insanity, and that medical treatment would have been more
appropriate than church discipline.
RELIGION AND MORALS, 235
due attendance upon the ministry and the sound doctrines of our
religion settled in this colony.
" 3. That he hath endeavored to spread sundry heretical opin-
ions, and that under expressions which hold forth some degree
of blasphemy, and to corrupt the minds of people therein.
" 4, That he hath endeavored to vilify or nullify the just author-
ity of the magistracy and government here setded.
" 5. That in all these miscarriages he hath endeavored to dis-
turb the peace of this jurisdiction."
The sentence was, in the excess of punishment which
it ordered, worthy of the High Commission, or of the
Star-Chamber. It discovers in the court a hatred of
the prisoner's opinions, which is but thinly covered by
the specification of overt crimes. Norton was fined,
whipped, branded, and banished.
At the session of the colonial court next following,
the proceedings against Norton having been approved,
laws were enacted against "a cursed sect lately risen up
in the world, which are commonly called Quakers,'* im-
posing fines on any who should bring them into the col-
ony, or harbor them ; requiring Quakers coming in about
"their civil, lawful occasions," upon their first arrival, to
appear before the authority of the place, and from them
have license to pass about and issue their lawful occa-
sions ; and providing penalties if they attempt to seduce
others, if they revile or reproach, or any other way make
disturbance or offend. If a Quaker having fallen under
these penalties, and having been sent out of the juris-
diction, should presume to return, penalties increasing
in severity are provided for the second, the third, and
the fourth offence. Penalties are also provided for
bringing into the jurisdiction Quaker books, and for
circulating or concealing them.
236 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The cruelty of laws whose penalties culminated in
"tongues bored through with a hot iron" must be re-
volting, even to those who justify the fathers of the
New Haven Colony in intrusting with political power
only such as were of the "religion settled in this
colony." But such penalties were not peculiar to New
Haven or to New England. In England, two years
earlier, a Quaker by the name of James Naylor had
been bored through the tongue, and otherwise tor-
mented. So that, however true it may be that " emi-
gration tends to barbarism," the severest punishment
with which Quakers were threatened by the people of
New Haven was not invented on this side of the
Atlantic.
Either these laws were very effective in deterring
persons of the troublesome and hated sect from remain-
ing within the jurisdiction, or there was little occasion
for the terror which led to their enactment. Only
three instances are found, subsequent to the enact-
ment of the laws against Quakers, in which action is
taken against persons thus denominated. The first oc-
curred a few days after the laws were enacted, and
resulted in a fine imposed upon an inhabitant of Green-
wich for the miscarriages of himself and his wife in
the use of the tongue against elders and magistrates.
In the second, a seaman was sent on board his vessel
lying in the harbor of New Haven ; and the master
was required to keep him on board till he should
carry him out of the jurisdiction. The third concerned
a Quaker brought over from Southold : it was ordered
that the offender " be whipped, and that he be bound
in. a bond of fifty pounds for his good behavior for the
RELIGION AND MORALS, 237
time to come, to carry it in a comely and inoffensive
manner."
Besides Baptists and Quakers, there were no sec-
taries in the colony of New Haven till after its absorp-
- ^ ^ tion into Connecticut. Thirteen years after the union,
the Lords of the Privy Council, through their commis-
sioners for trade and foreign plantations, sent out a
schedule of questions concerning the condition of Con-
necticut. The twenty-sixth inquiry was as follows:
viz., "What persuasion in religious matters is most
prevalent \ and among the varieties, which you are to
express, what proportion in number and quality of
people [does] one hold to the other .^" To this ques-
tion Gov. Leete replied one year later, "Our people
in this colony are, some of them, strict Congregational
men, others more large Congregational men, and some
moderate Presbyterians. The Congregational men of
both sorts are the greatest part of the people in the
colony. There are four or five Seventh-day men, and
about so many more Quakers." The "moderate Pres-
byterians " to whom the governor alludes were a party
in the church at Hartford, including Mr. Stone, the
pastor, who maintained that Congregationalism was
" a speaking aristocracy in the face of a silent democ-
racy." He, and' those who agreed with him in thus
magnifying the authority of the elders, were naturally
called Presbyterians by those who magnified the rights
of the brotherhood ; » but there was no outward sep-
aration of them from "Congregational men," either
"strict " or "large ; " and they did not call themselves
* Gov. Leete was a member of the church in Guilford, which from its
beginning would never have a ruling elder.
238 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Presbyterians, but claimed that theirs was genuine Con-
gregationalism. The condition of the united colony
fourteen years after the union being such as Gov.
Leete represents, we may conclude that in the colony
of New Haven, previous to the union, there was to all
intents and purposes entire ecclesiastical uniformity.
As another inquiry of the commissioners related to
religion, we may as well record the reply of Gov. Leete.
Though covering the whole territory of Connecticut, it
throws light on the religious condition of that portion
of it which a few years before had been the jurisdic-
tion of New Haven. The twenty-seventh inquiry was :
" What course is taken for the instructing of the peo-
ple in the Christian religion } How many churches and
ministers are there within your government, and how
many are yet wanting for the accommodation of your
corporation ? " The reply was, "(i) Great care is taken
for the instruction of the people in the Christian re-
ligion, by ministers catechising of them, and preach-
ing to them twice every sabbath day, and sometimes
lecture days ; and so by masters of families instructing
or catechising their children and ser\'ants, being so re-
quired to do by law. (2) In our corporation are twenty-
six towns, and there are one and twenty churches in
them. (3) There is, in every town in our colony, a
settled minister, except it be in two towns new begun ;
and they are seeking out for ministers to settle amongst
them."
It was held in those days, that there should be in
every church, if possible, a pastor, a teacher, a ruling
elder, and one or more deacons. In the church at New
Haven Mr. Davenport was chosen pastor, and Robert
RELIGION AND MORALS. 239
Newman and Matthew Gilbert deacons, soon after the
organization. In 1644 Rev. William Hooke was or-
dained teacher ; and about the same time Robert New-
man, one of the deacons, was ordained ruling elder.*
"Thus," says Dr. Bacon, "the church became com-
pletely supplied with the officers which every church
in that day was supposed to need. It had within itself
a complete presbytery, — a full body of ordained elders,
competent to maintain a regular succession, without
any dependence on the supposed ordaining power of
ministers out of the church, and without any necessity
of resorting to the extraordinary measure of ordination
by persons specially delegated for that purpose. The
three elders — one of whom was to give attention chief-
ly to the administration of the order and government of
the church, while the others were to labor in word and
doctrine — were all equally and in the same sense
'elders,' or 'overseers,* of the flock of God. The one
was a mere elder ; but the others were elders called to
the work of preaching. The distinction between pas-
tor and teacher was theoretical, rather than of any
practical importance. Both were in the highest sense
ministers of the gospel ; as colleagues they preached by
turns on the Lord's Day, and on all other public occa-
sions ; they had an equal share in the administration
* Robert Newman returned to England, and no one was appointed to
succeed him as ruling elder. Mr. Hooke also returned to the mother
countr)', and was succeeded by Rev. Nicholas Street Mr. Street was bom
in Taunton, England, was educated at Oxford University, and had been
teacher of the church in Taunton in the colony of Plymouth. He was in-
stalled at New Haven, according to the church record, Nov. 26, or, as
Davenport writes in a letter to John Winthrop, jun. (Mass. Hist CoIL
XXXVH., 507), Nov. 23, 1659.
240 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
of discipline ; and if Mr. Davenport was more venerated
than Mr. Hooke, and had more influence in the church
and in the community generally, it was more because
of the acknowledged personal superiority of the former
in respect to age and gifts and learning, than because
of any official disparity. The Cambridge platform,
which was framed in 1648, and with which Mr. Daven-
port, in his writings on church government, fully agrees,
says, in defining the difference between pastors and
teachers, 'The pastor's special work is to attend to
exhortation, and therein to administer a word of wis-
dom ; the teacher is to attend to doctrine, and therein
to administer a word of knowledge ; and either of them
to administer the seals of that covenant, unto the dis-
pensation of which they are alike called; as also to
execute the censures, being but a kind of application of
the Word : the preaching of which, together with the
application thereof, they are alike charged withal.'
The pastor and teacher gave themselves wholly to
their ministry and their studies, and accordingly re-
ceived a support from the people : they might properly
be called clergymen. The ruling elder was not neces-
sarily educated for the ministry : he might without
impropriety pursue some secular calling ; and, though
he fed the flock occasionally with ' a word of admoni-
tion,' the ministry was not his profession. Inasmuch
as he did not live by the ministry, he was a layman."
But there was perhaps no other church in the colony
provided with a presbytery complete according to the
Cambridge platform, than that of New Haven. The
church at Guilford had for its pastor Rev. Henry Whit-
field, under whose guidance most of the people had
RELIGION AND MORALS. 24 1
crossed the ocean ; and for its teacher Rev. John Hig-
ginson, a son-in-law of its pastor. But, to borrow the
the language of one of its later pastors, **they never
had, and upon principle never would admit, a ruling
elder. Although in all other things Mr. Whitfield and
Mr. Davenport and their churches exactly agreed, yet in
this they were quite different. I have made diligent in-
quiry into the subject, many years ago, with old people
who were personally acquainted with the first members
of the church. They all invariably agree, that as Mr.
Whitfield was never ordained in any sense at Guilford,
but officiated as their pastor by virtue of his ordination
in England, so neither he nor the church would allow of
a ruling elder ; and the ancient tradition in the church
here was, that New Haven, and afterward other churches
in the colony, confirmed their judgment and practice to
Mr. Whitfield's and his church's judgment." ' After the
return of Mr. Whitfield to England, Mr. Higginson was
both pastor and teacher, until 1659, when he removed
to Salem. At Milford Mr. Prudden was the only
preaching elder, Rev. John Sherman, a resident of the
tjown, having declined the office of teacher to which
the church had elected him ; but Zachariah Whitman,
as ruling elder, was associated with Mr. Prudden in the
care of the church. Mr. Prudden, dying in 1656, was
succeeded, after an interim of four years, by Rev. Roger
Newton, who, like his predecessor, was the only preach-
ing elder. No records of the church at Southold of an
earlier date than 1745 being extant, we cannot ascer-
tain whether it had a ruling elder; but there is no
' Letter of Rev. Thomas Ruggles, author of a History of Guilford, to
Rev. Dr. Stiles ; printed in Mass. Hist. Coll., X. 91.
242 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
reason to doubt that Mr. Youngs was its only preaching
officer. At Stamford Rev. John Bishop was both pas-
tor and teacher ; as was Rev. Abraham Pierson at Bran-
ford, when, with the approbation of the Jurisdiction
Court, a settlement had been made, and a church had
been gathered, in that place.
The preaching elders were maintained from the
treasury of tJu churchy and not of the town, the treas-
ury being supplied by contributions made every Lord's
Day ; but these contributions were, if not from the be-
ginning, certainly very soon after the beginning, made
in accordance with a pledge which every inhabitant
was required to give, that he would contribute a certain
amount yearly for the maintenance of the ministry.
The law respecting such pledges reads as follows : —
'* It IS ordered, that when and so oft as there shall be cause,
either through the pcrverseness or negligence of men, the particu-
lar court in each plantation, or, where no court is held, the deputies
last chosen for the General Court, with the constable, or other officer
for preser\'ing peace, and so forth, shall call all the inhabitants,
whether planters or sojourners, before them, and desire every one
particularly to set down what proportion he is willing and able
to allow yearly, while God continues his estate, toward the main-
tenance of the ministr}' there. But if any one or more, to the dis-
couragement or hinderance of this work, refuse or delay, or set
down an unmeet proportion ; in any and every such case, the par-
ticular court, or deputies and constable as aforesaid, shall rate and
assess every such person, according to his visible estate there, with
due moderation and in equal proportion with his neighbors. But
if after that he deny or delay, or tender unsuitable payment, it shall
be recovered as other just debts. And it is further ordered, Tha«
if any man remove from the plantation where he lived, and leave
or suffer his land there, or any part of it, to lie unimproved, neither
selling it, nor freely surrendering it to the plantation, he shall pay
RELIGION AND MORALS, 243
one third part of what he paid before for his movable estate and
lands also. And in each plantation where ministers' maintenance
is allowed in a free way without rating, he shall pay one third part
of what other men of the lowest rank enjoying such accommoda-
tions, do pay ; but if any removing, settle near the said plantation,
and continue still to improve his land, or such part of it as seems
good to himself, he shall pay two-thirds of what he paid before
when he lived in the plantation, both for movable estate and land,
or two-thirds-part of what others of like accommodation pay."
There is, perhaps, an intimation in the law, that the
amount which each inhabitant should pay for the main-
tenance of the elders was determined, in some of the
plantations, by assessors and not by himself. Practi-
cally, there could not be much difference in the two
methods, since, if the " free way without rating " was
practised, the order of the court obliged non-resident
proprietors and unwilling residents to pay according to
their taxable estates.
The general synod at Cambridge, which in 1648 pre-
pared, agreed to, and published the system of ecclesias-
tical polity known as the Cambridge platform, included
representatives of the churches in the colony of New
Haven ; and this platform fairly represents the Congre-
gationalism of these churches from their organization
to the formation of the Saybrook platform in the early
part of the eighteenth century. The same synod took
action on the confession of faith published by the
Westminster Assembly of divines, as follows : —
" This synod, having perused and considered, with much glad-
ness of heart and thankfulness to God, the confession of faith
published of late by the reverend assembly in England, do judge
it to be very holy, orthodox, and judicious in all matters of faith ;
244 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY.
and do therefore freely and fully consent thereunto, for the sub-
stance thereof. Only in those things which have respect to
church government and discipline, we refer ourselves to the plat-
form of church discipline agreed upon by this present assembly.'*
The Presbyterian party being at that time in the as-
cendant in England, the synod adopted the Westmin-
ster Confession, instead of framing one for themselves,
for the sake of vindicating in the mother country the
orthodoxy of New England Congregationalists. They
say in their preface : —
"We, who are by nature Englishmen, do desire to hold forth
the same doctrine of religion, especially in fundamentals, which we
see and know to be held by the churches of England." *' By this
our professed consent and free concurrence with them in all the
doctrinals of religion, we hope it may appear to the world, that, as
we are a remnant of the people of the same nation ^-ith them, so
we are professors of the same common faith, and fellow-heirs of
the same common salvation."
If the Church of England had been at that time
Episcopal, the Cambridge Synod would with equal will-
ingness have adopted the doctrinal part of the Thirty-
Nine Articles. These articles they heartily received,
according to the interpretation generally given to them
in the reign of Elizabeth, in the first part of the reign
of James I., and by the Calvinistic party in the Church
of England subsequently. The pastors and teachers
of the churches in the New Haven colony retained the
Calvinistic theology in which they had been indoctri-
nated in the universities, and believed, as did their
teachers, that it was consistent with and embodied in
the Thirty-Nine Articles. After the restoration of the
Thirty-Nine Articles in the national church of England,
. RELIGION AND MORALS. 24S
the churches of Connecticut publicly agreed with the
dissenters in the mother country, in adopting them as
a standard of orthodoxy. The Heads of Agreement
which accompany the Saybrook platform say, " As to
what appertains to soundness of judgment in matters
of faith, we esteem it sufficient that a church acknowl-
edge the Scriptures to be the word of God, the perfect
and only rule of faith and practice, and own either the
doctrinal part of those commonly called the articles of
the Church of England, or the confession, or cate-
chisms, shorter or longer, compiled by the assembly at
Westminster, or the confession agreed on at the Savoy,
to be agreeable to the said rule." This declaration,
though' made after the first generation had passed
away, would have been uttered by the fathers as wil-
lingly as by their children, if justified by an appropriate
occasion.
In each plantation there was a building in which the
church assembled for worship. It was built and owned
by the proprietors of the plantation, and was used for
meetings of the General Court as well as of the church.
Having this double design, it was not called a church or
a church-house, as an edifice used only for church ser-
vices would naturally be denominated, but a meeting-
house. This twofold use of the edifice did not offend
the religious sentiment of the people ; for the court was
composed of church-members who came together in a
religious spirit to serve God in the business of the
court as truly as they served him in the ordinances of
the church. It was not a temporary expedient such as
a people believing in a more thorough separation of
24i6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Church and State might adopt in a new plantation till
they were able to provide more appropriately for each ;
but it was in its design a permanent arrangement be-
fitting a theocratic constitution of society.
The meeting-houses in the several plantations differed
in siie, but were similar in external appearance and
internal arrangement. The meeting-house at Guilford
was, however, of stone, as were a few of the principal
dwellings in that plantation. That at Milford was of
wood, was forty feet square, and had a roof in shape
RELIGION AND MORALS. 247
like a truncated pyramid, surmounted by a "tower."
That at New Haven was of wood, was fifty feet square,
and had a roof like that of the Milford house, and a
"tower and turret." There were also " banisters and
rails on the meeting-house top/' which probably en-
closed that higher and flatter portion of the roof from
which the tower ascended. It was built in accordance
with an order of the General Court, passed Nov. 25,
1639. The estimated cost was ;;^5cx>; and, as the last
instalment of the tax levied to raise that sum was made
payable in the following May, one may infer that the
expectation was that it would be finished within a year.
It stood in the market-place, certainly near its centre,
and presumably exactly upon it.' The frame being
insufficient to support the weight of the tower and
turret, it became necessary to shore up the posts.
In time it was found that the shores were impaired
by decay, and fears were expressed that the house
would fall. In January, 1660, there was a discussion
at a general court concerning the meeting-house.
Some were in favor of taking down both the tower
and the turret. Some were for removing the turret,
and allowing the tower to remain. Some thought that
both tower and turret might be retained, if the shores
' See in Mass. Hist Coll. XL., p. 474, a curious essay on the laying
out of towns. The author is unknown, and it is without address or date.
It seems to have been written before the settlement of New Haven, but
lays down the same principles as ruled in laying out New Haven. The
meeting-house is to be "the centre of the whole circumference." The
houses are to be orderly placed about it. Then there is to be a first divis-
ion of lands extending from the centre one-half the distance to the out-
side boundary, to be improved in the earlier years of the settlement,
before the second division comes into use.
248 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
were renewed, and the frame were strengthened with
braces within the house. In conclusion, it was "de-
termined, that, besides the renewing of the shores,
both turret and tower shall be taken down." Probably
the order to take down the tower and turret was not
executed, for a committee on the meeting-house re-
ported, Aug. II, 1662, that "they thought it good that
the upper turret be taken down. The thing being
debated, it was put to vote, and concluded to be done,
and left to the townsmen to see to get it done."
The internal arrangement of a meeting-house is
shown in the accompanying plan. Behind the pulpit
was the seat of the teaching elders ; immediately in
front of it was the seat of the ruling elder ; and before
the seat of the ruling elder was the seat of the deacons,
having a shelf in front of it, which ordinarily hung
suspended from hinges, so as to present its broad sur-
face to the congregation, but, when needed for a com-
munion-table, was elevated to a horizontal position.
The report of the committee for seating people in
the meeting-house at New Haven, in 1655, shows that
the deacons were expected to sit one at each end of
their official seat, and that each of them had his own
place, — four men being appointed to sit before Deacon
Gilbert's seat, and three women before Deacon Miles*s
seat. In ever)' such meeting-house the sexes were
seated apart, the men on one side, and the women on the
other side, of the middle "alley." The soldiers' scats
were, however, an exception to the rule, one-half of
them being on the women's side of the house. In the
meeting-house at New Haven the " forms " between the
" alleys " were long enough to accommodate seven per-
RELIGION AND MORALS,
249
sons, but only two or three were assigned to those near
the pulpit, the space allowed to each person having
some proportion to his dignity. At "the upper end"
were five cross-seats and " one little seat." The seat-
Li
s
^
O
MI
on
GROUND-PLAN OP A MEETING-HOUSB.
A. Teaching Elders. B. Ruling Elders. C. Deacons. S. Soldien.
ing of 1655 assigns two men to "the bench before the
little seat," and, on the opposite side of the house, two
women to " the seat before the little seat." In like
manner persons were assigned to sit in front of every
2SO HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY.
front seat in the house. The first seating which is
recorded placed only proprietors and their wives. The
second was more liberal, including apparently all heads
of families, but, with the exception of " Mr. Goodyear's
daughters," no unmarried women. This more liberal
policy in the assignment of seats rendered it necessary
to place benches in the "alleys," before every front
seat. In the meeting-house at New Haven there were
two pillars, one on that part where the men were seated,
and one on the women's side. Apparently they were
designed to aid in supporting the weight of the tower
and turret. On the accompanying ground-plan they
are represented as placed in the side "alleys," half way
from front to rear.
In Januar}% 1647, "i^ was ordered that the particular
court with the two deacons, taking in the advice of the
ruling elder, should place people in the meeting-house,
and it was also ordered that the governor may be spared
therein." * At a general court held the tenth of March,
this committee having meanwhile performed their duty,
" the names of people, as they were seated in the meet-
ing-house, were read in court, and it was ordered they
should be recorded." In 1656, nine years later, another
record was made, and in 1662 a third record of the
names of people as they were seated in the meeting-
* The governor may have been spared, because, his wife being now
excommunicate, no seat could be assigned to her by name. It will be
seen, however, that there was plenty of room for her in the seat with
"old Mrs. Eaton.*' Ten years later, the governor's mother being now
dead, the seat was assigned to his wife under the adroit circumlocution,
" The first as it was," but the committee's faculty of circimilocution failed
when they came to the bench in front of that seat, and they wrote, ** Before
Mrs. Eaton's seat"
RELIGION AND MORALS, 251
house. As a comparison of these records may assist
the reader to nqjte the increase of the congregation
and the change in its personnel, we have transcribed
them to be printed in Appendix IV. At the town
meeting at which the second list of names was read,
** it was agreed that (because there want seats for some,
and that the alleys are so filled with blocks, stools,
and chairs, that it hinders a free passage) low benches
shall be made at the end of the seats on both sides
of the alleys, for young persons to sit on." But these
additional seats did not suffice, for about twelve months
later the townsmen, or, as we now term them, the select-
men, were "desired to speak with some workmen to see
if another little gallery may not for a small charge be
made adjoining that [which] is already." This mention
of the gallery prompts us to suggest, that, as with few
exceptions the persons who had seats assigned to them
by name were heads of families, young men and young
women sat in the gallery, as was the general custom
in New England in later generations. That the interior
of the building was cared for and kept free from dust,
is evident from the minute, " It is ordered that sister
Preston shall sweep and dress the meeting-house every
week, and have one shilling a week for her pains."
The people of each plantation gathered together on.
the morning of every Lord's day to a sanctuary not
unlike that which has been described. The first drum
was beaten about eight o'clock in the tower of the
meeting-house and through the streets of the town.
When the second drum beat, families came forth from
their dwellings, and walked in orderly procession to the
252 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY.
house of God, children following their parents to the
door, though not allowed to sit with them in the assem-
bly. The ministers in the pulpit wore gowns and bands
as they had done in England, their Puritan scruples
reaching not to all the badges of official distinction
which they had been accustomed to see and to use, but
only to the surplice.
There is, perhaps, no way in which one can more
accurately conceive of the ritual of worship in these
churches than by reading what has been written by a
contemporar)% concerning worship in New England
and especially in Boston. Lechford ' says : —
" The public worship is in as fair a meeting-house as they can
provide, wherein, in most places they have been at great charges.
Every Sabbath or Lord's day they come together at Boston by
ringing of a bell, about nine of the clock or before. The pastor
begins with solemn prayer, continuing about a quarter of an hour.
The teacher then readcth and expoundeth a chapter. Then a
psalm is sung ; whichever, one of the ruling elders dictates. Alter
that, the pastor preacheth a sermon, and sometimes ex tempore
exhorts. Then the teacher concludes with prayer and a blessing.
*• Once a month is a sacrament of the Lords Supper, whereof
notice is given usually a fortnight before, and then all others de-
parting save the church, which is a great deal less in number than
those that go away, they receive the sacrament, the ministers and
ruling elders sitting at the table, the rest in their seats or upon
forms. All cannot see the minister consecrating unless they stand
up and make a narrow shift. The one of the teaching elders prays
before, and blesseth and consecrates the bread and wine, according
to the words of institution : the other prays after the receiving of
all the members : and next communion they change turns ; he that
' Lechford was a lawyer, who, being disbarred for talking with a jury-
man out of court, returned to England.
RELIGION AND MORALS, - 253
began at that ends at this ; and the ministers deliver the bread in
a charger to some of the chief, and peradventure give to a few the
bread into their hands, and they deliver the charger from one to
another, till all have eaten ; in like manner the cup, till all have
drunk, goes from one to another. Then a psalm is sung, and with
a short blessing the congregation is dismissed. Any one, though
not of the church, may, in Boston, come in and see the sacrament
administered if he will ; but none of any church in the countrj* may
receive the sacrament there without leave of the congregation, for
which purpose he comes to one of the ruling elders, who propounds
his name to the congregation before they go to the sacrament.
" About two in the afternoon they repair to the meeting-house
again ; and tlien the pastor begins as before noon, and, a psalm
being sung, the teacher makes a sermon. He was wont, when I
came first, to read and expound a chapter also before his sermon
in the afternoon. After and before his sermon he prayeth.
"After that ensues baptism, if there be any; which is done by
either pastor or teacher, in the deacon's seat, the most eminent
place in the church, next under the elders* seat. The pastor most
commonly makes a speech or exhortation to the church and parents
concerning baptism, and then prayeth before and after. It is done
by washing or sprinkling. One of the jjarents being of the church,
the child may be baptized, and the baptism is into the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. No sureties are
required.
" Which ended, follows the contribution, one of the deacons say-
ing, * Brethren of the congregation, now there is time left for con-
tribution, wherefore, as God hath prospered you, so freely offer.*
Upon some extraordinary occasions, as building or repairing of
churches or meeting-houses, or other necessities, the ministers
press a liberal contribution, with effectual exhortations out of
Scripture. The magistrates and chief gentlemen first, and then
the elders and all the congregation of men, and most of them that
are not of the church, all single persons, widows and women in
absence of their husbandsjf* come up one after another one way,
' Mrs. Brewster, in the absence of her husband, who had sailed for
England in Lamberton's ship, went forward with her gift " because her
254 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX CO LOW,
and bring their ofiferings to the deacon at his seat, and put it into
a box of wood for the purpose, if it be money or papers : if it be
any other chattel, they set it or lay it down before the deacons,
and so pass another way to their seats again."
The sermons were much longer than would be en-
dured at the present day ; but were not regarded by
the hearers as too long, such was the interest which
the people felt in the exposition of the Scriptures, and
so little else was there to occupy their intellectual and
spiritual faculties. Long sermons, however, were not
a peculiarity of New England. The churches in the
mother-country were commonly supplied with hour-
glasses, one hour being the ordinary measure of a ser-
mon ; but when an able preacher turned the glass to
signify that he wished to speak longer, the congregation
would give visible, if not audible, expression of their
approval.
After the contribution, candidates were "propounded"
for admission to the church, or, having been previously
announced as candidates, were, on their assenting to the
covenant of the church, formally received into its com-
munion. If there were any matters of offence requir-
ing censure, they were then attended to, "sometimes
till it be very late." " If they have time after this, is
sung a psalm, and then the pastor concludeth with a
prayer and a blessing."
In the church at New Haven it was the custom for
husband had commanded her,** but was charged with saying, " It was as
going to mass or going up to the high altar." She denied " that ever she
spake of mass or high altar in reference to the contributions," but adroitly
quoted the text, " when thou bringest thy gift to the altar," alleging that
she first heard it applied to the contributions by her irreproachable seat-
mate, Mrs. Lamberton.
RELIGION AND MORALS, 255
the assembly to rise and stand while the preacher read
the passage of Scripture which he had selected as a
text for his sermon. But Hutchinson says that this
was a peculiarity of that church, and quotes a letter from
Hooker to Shepard, referring to the Sunday when the
practice commenced in the afternoon, Mr. Davenport
having preached a sermon in the morning advocating
such an expression of reverence for the word of God.
Stated religious services in addition to those of the
Lord's Day were held on other days of the week, the
arrangement of them differing probably in the several
plantations. In New Haven the church had a meeting
by themselves on Tuesday, or "third day," as their
scruples required them, at least for a time, to term the
third day of the week. On Thursday, or " fifth day,"
there was a public lecture open to all.' Allusion is also
made in the records to neighborhood-meetings, not only
during the year preceding the formation of a church
and a government, but so late as May, 1661.
" A plantation whose design is religion " ought to be
distinguished for morality. Such being the design of
all the plantations combined in the colony of New
Haven, we naturally expect to find it standing higher
than midway in a list of Christian communities arranged
according to their respective degrees of ethical purity.
All the proprietors were, or desired to become, church-
' I am not sure that either the church-meeting or the lecture-service
was held cvcr>' week. The lecture probably occurred regularly, whatever
the interval ; the church-meeting may have lieen appointed by the elders
whenever there Was occasion. I think, however, that church-meetings
were always on third day, and lectures always on fifth day.
256 HISTORY OF XEW HAVEX COLOXY,
members, and all had evinced the sincerity of their re-
ligious professions by coming into the wilderness for the
sake of their religion. Such men were personally moral,
and, so far as they could control their children, their
ser\'ants, and the strangers who sojourned among them,
they preser\'ed their community free from vice. It is
true that the records supply evidence that the moral law
was sometimes transgressed. Indeed, if one should
judge solely from the number of cases brought to trial,
he might come to the conclusion that there was a low
state of morals in the colony. But a community gov-
erned by Puritans differed from other communities,
both in the comprehensiveness of the moral code en-
forced by the civil law, and in the strictness with which
laws enacted in the interest of morality were enforced.
Probably more cases were brought before the court, in
proportion to the number of crimes committed, than in
any community of the present day. In our time the
civil law aims to protect society from the destructive
power of immorality, and this is the limit of its endeavor
in behalf of morality. If there be any laws on the
statute-book designed to protect an individual from him-
self, or to enforce the duties which man owes to God,
such laws are ancient, and, for want of enforcement,
are practically obsolete.
The whole duty of a man comprises his duties to
himself, his duties to his fellow-beings, and his duties
to God. Puritan law enforced the obligations of the
first and third, as well as of the second division.
Drunkenness and unchastity were trespasses which the
offender committed against himself, — trespasses from
which the innocent were to be deterred by penalties
RELIGION AND MORALS, 2$?
threatened, and, whenever there was transgression, by
penalties inflicted. Blasphemy was an outrage upon
the being spoken against, and wilful absence from pub-
lic worship was to rob God of the outward honor right-
fully belonging to him : there were therefore laws to
protect the rights of God by punishing such impiety.
The field in which ethical purity was enforced by
law, being considerably wider than in modern times, the
moral sentiment of society being high-toned, and magis-
trates being conscientiously diligent in maintaining
law, there were more criminal prosecutions than would
occur under modern laws and modern administration
in a community equally virtuous and of equal popula-
tion. Allowing for the breadth of the Puritan code of
morals, and the conscientiousness with which law was
enforced, one must conclude that the people of the
New Haven colony were more moral than the people
inhabiting the same territory have been during any
equal period in modern times. Antecedent to the
union with Connecticut, there was no trial of an
English person for murder. There is incidental evi-
dence that there was one trial for adultery, though
the record of it is lost. There were executions for
crimes of unnatural lust, but the imperfection of the
records renders it impossible to determine how many.
Trials for fornication, drunkenness, and theft were not
as numerous in proportion to the population as on the
same territory in our own time.
Generally, offenders were either servants or artisans
temporarily resident. But in a comparatively few cases
the children of proprietors so far deviated from the
strictly moral life required by Puritan law, as to be sum-
258 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
moncd before the magistrates. When this happened,
it usually appeared that they had been misled by sen^-
ants, bond or hired. One such case ilhistrates the firm-
ness and impartiality with which law was administered.
The daughter of a magistrate was, by order of the court
of magistrates, whipped for " consenting to go in the
night to the farms with Will. Harding to a venison
feast ; for stealing things from her parents ; and yielding
to filthy dalliance with the said Harding." Neither her
father who was a member of the court, nor her father's \'
" cousin " who presided, however they may have shrunk
and faltered, refused to administer the same measure as
they would have administered to the humblest appren-
tice.
Passing out of the zone in which morality was pro-
tected by civil law, into the region where conscience
and public sentiment ruled, we find the colonists supe-
rior rather than inferior to their descendants and succes-
sors. In the sobriety which governs animal appetites ;
in the observance of the rules of righteousness between
man and man ; in the carefulness with which honor was
given to those to whom honor was due, and. especially
to the Supreme Ruler, — they excelled.
Haxnng said so much in commendation^, we must in
truthfulness testify, that, like the saints whose sins are
recorded on the pages of Holy Writ, they were human
and therefore imperfect. Even among church-members
there were cases of gross immorality. In a single
church there was one case of lying, one of fraud, one
of drunkenness, and one of unnatural lust. These ex-
ceptional outbreaks of wickedness are conspicuous by
reason of the general sobriety, righteousness, and god-
liness of the community in which they occurred.
•^»i
RELIGION AND MORALS, 259
If there was any sin to which Puritans were espe-
cially liable, it was avarice. Watchful against carnality
and ungodliness, they were less suspicious of that lust
of acquiring, which under the guise of such virtues as
industry, frugality, and domestic affection, sometimes
held them in a bondage of which they were little aware.
Hence there were frequent appeals to the court for jus-
tice between man and man in regard to contracts, and in
one instance a complaint from the deacons of the church
in the principal plantation that " the wampum that is
put into the church-treasury is generally so bad that
the elders to whom they pay it cannot pay it away."
The court, appointing a committee to inquire further
concerning the matter, found that " the contributions
for the church-treasury are by degrees so much abated
that they afford not any considerable maintenance to
the teaching officers, and that much of the wampum
brought in is such, and so faulty, that the officers can
hardly, or not at all, pass it away in any of their occa-
sions." Those who abated their contributions too much,
or cast into the treasury of the church worthless money,
were certainly wrong ; but perhaps those who in our
day are accustomed to receive and count the contribu-
tions of churches, could testify that such manifestations
of avarice are not peculiar to ancient times.
The outward honor shown to those who were worthy
of honor was in the seventeenth century rendered as
being of moral obligation. Good morals included good
manners, and good manners were so far forth good
morals. The Puritan gave to the fifth commandment so
broad a scope that it required outward expressions of
reverence for all superiors in age or station. It would
260 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEX COLONY,
be impossible now to re-establish the manners of the
seventeenth century, or to convince any considerable
part of society that the young owe to their superiors in
age any such degree of deference as was then acknowl-
edged to be due. But even to one who believes that out-
ward signs of reverence were then excessive, there may
perhaps be more of fitness and beauty in the manners
of the olden time, notwithstanding such excess, than in
the opposite extreme sometimes exhibited in modem
society. Certainly, as reverence for superiors was then
universally held to be of moral obligation, the people of
New Haven colony are to be credited for the general
rendition of honor to whom honor is due.
CHAPTER XIII.
LEARNINa
PROTESTANT Christianity places so much empha-
sis on individual accountability to God that con-
sistency requires a Protestant community to provide
that every person shall be able to read, in order that
he may read the Scriptures. The Puritan fathers of
New England established schools as early as, or earlier
than, they organized churches, and with direct reference
to religious instruction as the ultimate end. Under the
caption "Children's Education," the New Haven law
reads as follows : —
" Whereas too many parents and masters, either through an
over tender respect to their own occasions and business, or not
duly considering the good of their children and apprentices, have
too much neglected duty in their education while they are young
and capable of learning, It is Ordered, That the deputies for the
particular court in each plantation within this jurisdiction for the
time being, or where there are no such deputies, the constable or
other officer or officers in public trust, shall, from time to time, have
a vigilant eye over their brethren and neighbors within the limits
of the said plantation ; that all parents and masters do duly en-
deavor, either by their own ability and labor, or by improving such
school-master or other help and means as the plantation doth afford
or the family may conveniently provide, that all their children and
apprentices, as they grow capable, may, through God's blessing,
attain at least so much as to be able duly to read the Scriptures
261
262 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY,
and other good and profitable printed books in the English tongue,
being their native language ; and, in some competent measure, to
understand the main grounds and principles of Christian religion
necessary to salvation."
The Statute then proceeds to provide for its enforce-
ment, imposing fine after fine, and finally authorizing
the court of magistrates if " such children or serxants
may be in danger to grow barbarous, rude, and stub-
born," to "take such children or apprentices from such
parents or masters, and place them for years, boys till
they come to the age of one and twenty, and girls till
they come to the age of eighteen years, with such
others who shall better educate and govern them, both
for public conveniency and for the particular good of
the said children or apprentices.*'
We learn from the statute that the end for which
schools were instituted was that children might not
grow "barbarous, rude, and stubborn." From the his-
tory of the schools we shall further find that the plant-
ers had in view not only to secure the colony from the
existence of a dangerous class, but to qualify some of
their youth to be leaders of the people in the following
generation.
The first planters of the earliest plantation in the
colony brought with them a school-master. A few
months after the arrival of the company at Ouinnipiac,
and apparently as soon as a room for the school could
be provided, he commenced to teach. Michael Wiggles-
worth, who was his pupil in the summer of 1639, says,
" I was sent to school to Mr. Ezekiel Cheever, who at
that time taught school in his own house ; and under
him, in a year or two I profited so much, through the
LEARNING, 263
blessing of God, that I began to make Latin, and to get
on apace.'* The revision of the town records sanc-
tioned by the General Court, after the unfaithfulness
of Secretary Fugill had been discovered, gives the fol-
lowing minute concerning Mr. Cheever*s school : —
" For the better training up of youth in this town, that through
God's blessing they may be fitted for public service hereafter,
either in church or commonweal, it is ordered that a free school '
be set up, and the magistrates with the teaching elders are en-
treated to consider what rules and orders are meet to be observed,
and what allowance may be convenient for the school-master's care
and pains, which shall be paid out of the town's stock. According
to which order £20 a year was paid to Mr. Ezekiel Cheever, the
present school-master, for two or three years at first ; but tliat not
proving a competent maintenance, in August, 1644, it was enlarged
to £10 a year, and so continueth."
After Mr. Cheever*s difficulty with the church it was
uncomfortable for him to reside in New Haven, and he
soon removed to Ipswich. In October, 1650, "it was
propounded that a school-master be provided for the
town," and the matter was referred to a committee ;
but some time elapsed before a school-master was found
whom the town was willing to reward with so large a
salary as they had paid to Mr. Cheever. Mr. Jeanes,
one of the proprietors of the town, was willing to teach,
and, in March, 1651, "it was propounded to know
whether the town would allow any salary to Mr. Jeanes
for teaching school.^ Much debate was about it, but
' William Jeanes, whose house was at the corner of Chapel and Church
Streets. I have seen it stated that Rev. Thomas Tames, who lived at the
corner of Chapel and York Streets, taught school in New Haven; but
after diligent search I conclude that this is a mistake occasioned by the
similarity of his name to that of Jeanes.
264 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
nothing was ordered in it at present ; only it was pro-
pounded to him, that if the town would allow him ^10
a year, whether he would not go on to teach and take
the rest of the parents of the children by the quarter ;
but he returned no answer." On further reflection Mr.
Jeanes concluded to accept the town's offer, so that in
May the town "ordered that he should have £,\o for
this year." In October " Mr. Jeanes informed the town
that he is offered a considerable maintenance to go to
Wethersfield to teach school, yet if the town will settle
that ^10 a year upon him formerly ordered, he is
willing to stay here in the work he is. Whereupon it
was voted that for three years he have ^10 a year
as formerly ordered, and upon the same terms as
before." For some reason Mr. Jeanes did not continue
to teach for so long a period as the town had engaged
itself to him ; for, in October, 165 1 : —
" The secretary was desired to speak with Mr. Goodyear to use
some means to bring the school-master hither, who, they hear, is
coming, but wants transportation; and, about a fortnight later,
" the governor acquainted the court that now the school-master is
come, and some course must be taken to provide for his lodging
and diet : and to repair the school-house ; and consider what the
town will allow him a vear ; and what his work shall be ; therefore
it is necessary a committee should be chosen to treat with him.
The court considered of the motion, and chose the ruling elder,
the four deputies, and the treasurer, as a committee to treat with
him and provide for him; and declared that they are willing to
allow him ;£3o a year out of the treasur}-, or any greater sum as
they can agree, not exceeding £\o. and that his work should be to
perfect male children in the English after they can read in their
Testament or Bible, and to learn them to write, and to bring them
on to Latin as they are capable, and desire to proceed therein."
LEARNING, 26$
Three days later —
" The committee appointed at the last court to treat and agree
with the school-master, acquainted the court with what they had
done ; viz., that he propounded to have ;£2o a year, and the town
to pay for his chamber and diet (which they have agreed with Mr.
Atwater for, for five shillings per week) ; that the town pay toward
his charges in coming hither thirty shillings ; that he have liberty
once a year to go to see his friends, which we propounded to be
in harvest time ; that his pay be good, and €ome of it such as
wherewith he may buy books and defray charges in his travel;
that if he be called away (not to the same work, but to some other
employment which may be for the honor of Christ) he may have
liberty. And for this he will teach the children of this town
(having the benefit of strangers to himself) after they are entered
and can read in the Testament ; to perfect them in English ; and
teach them their Latin tongue as they are capable ; and to write.
After consideration the town voted to accept the terms propounded."
The school-master thus provided was Xphfi Hanford, tU«/^>»s ^
afterward settled in the ministry at Norwalk. When
he had taught about four months : —
"The governor acquainted the court that he hears the school-
master is somewhat discouraged, because he hath so many English
scholars which he must learn to spell, which was never the town's
mind, as appeared in the order which was now read. And it was
now ordered that the school-master shall send back such scholars
as he sees do not answer the first agreement with him, and the
parents of such children were desired not to send them."
Seven months after Mr. Hanford had commenced his
school : —
"The governor informed the court that one of Norwalk had
been with him to desire liberty for Mr. Hanford's remove to be
helpful to that plantation in the work of the ministr}': also Mr.
Hanford himself, who saith he finds his body unable, and that it
will not stand with his health to go on in bis work of teaching
266 HISTORY OF KEW HAVEN COLONY,
school, and therefore desires liberty to take his opportunity ; which
liberty he did reserve when he agreed with the town ; the record
of which agreement being read, it so appeared. Therefore, if his
mind was so set, they could not hinder him ; but a convenient time
of warning was desired, which he granted, if it was a month or
two."
On the same day when the aforesaid action was
taken, releasing Mr. Hanford, " brother Davis's son was
propounded to supply the school-master's place, and the
magistrates, elders, and deacons, with the deputies for
the court, were chosen as a committee to treat with him
about it." It is probable, however, that Mr. Davis was
not employed ; for the governor informed the court,
Nov. 8, 1652: —
'' That the cause of calling this meeting is about a school-master,
to let them know what he hath done in it. He hath written a let-
ter to one Mr. Bowers, who is school-master at Plymouth, and de-
sires to come into these parts to live, and another letter about one
Mr. Rowlandson, a scholar, who, he hears, will tike that employ-
ment upon him. How they will succeed, he knows not ; but now
Mr. Jeanes is come to the town, and is willing to come hither again
if he may have encouragement. What course had been taken to
get one he was acquainted with, and that, if either of them come,
he must be entertained ; but he said, if another come, he should be
willing to teach boys and girls to read and write, if the town
thought fit; and Mr. Jeanes being now present, confirmed it. The
town generally was willing to encourage Mr. Jeanes's coming, and
would allow him at least ten pounds a year out of the treasur}', and
the rest he might take of the parents of the children he teacheth,
by the quarter, as he did before, to make it up a comfortable main-
tenance. And many of the town thought there would be need of
two school-masters, for if a Latin school-master come, it is feared
he will be discouraged if many English scholars come to him.
Mr. Jeanes, seeing the town's willingness for his coming again,
acknowledged their love, and desired them to proceed no further
LEARNING, 26/
at this time ; for he was not sure he shall get free where he is, and
if he do, he doubts it will not be before winter. Therefore no
more was done in it at present."
About seven months later (June 21, 1653) : —
"The governor acquainted the town that Mr. Bowers, whom
they sent for to keep school, is now come, and that it hath been
difficult to find a place for his abode ; but now Thomas Kimberley*s
house is agreed upon, and he intends to begin his work next fifth
day if the town please ; with which the town was satisfied, and de-
clared that they would allow him as they did Mr. Hanford, —
that is, twenty pounds a year, and pay for his diet and chamber ;
and they expected from him that work which Mr. Hanford was to
do : and some that had spoken with him, declared that upon these
conditions he was content."
Mr. Bowers continued to teach the town school for
about seven years. He was at first troubled, as Mr.
Hanford had been, with so many " children sent to him
to learn their letters and to spell, that others, for whom
the school was chiefly intended, as Latin scholars,"
were neglected. The town, hearing of this, charged
two of the selectmen (as such officers are now called,
or townsmen, as they were then denominated) to send
all such children home, and desired the school-master
not to receive any more such. He does not appear to
have been hindered in his usefulness after his first year
by this or any other difficulty, till the last year of his
service. He then informed the court, April 23, 1660,
" that the number of scholars at present was but, eigh-
teen, and they are so unconstant that many times there
are but six or eight. He desired to know the town's
mind whether they would have a school or no school,
for he could not satisfy himself to go on thus. The
268 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
reason of it was inquired after, but not fully discovered
But that the school might be settled in some better way
for the furtherance of learning, it was referred to the
consideration of the court, elders, and townsmen, who
are desired to prepare it for the next meeting of the
town." At the next meeting "the governor declared
that the business of the school had also been considered
by the committee, but was left to be further considered
when it appears what will be done by the jurisdiction
general court concerning a colony school."
The institution of a colony school at New Haven, a
few months later, put an end to the town school, absorb-
ing into itself all the boys in the plantation whose
parents wished them to learn Latin.
The question naturally rises in the mind of one who
studies in the early town records of New Haven, the
history of its schools. What provision was there for chil-
dren who had not yet learned to read.^ So far as
appears, no provision was made at the public expense
for children not sufficiently advanced to enter the town
school : but parents were obliged either personally to
teach their children, or to pay for their instruction in
private schools. So early as February, 1645, "Mr. ^AA^'^
Pearce desired the plantation to take notice that if any
will send their children to him, he will instruct them in
writing or arithmetic." Probably other inhabitants from
time to time taught the rudiments of learning as they
could obtain pupils. Mr. Jcanes seems to have occupied
a middle position between such teachers of private
schools and the master of the public school, being re-
garded as less competent than those who received their
LEARNING. 269
maintenance wholly from the town, and yet worthy to
be encouraged by a grant from the public treasury when
a more learned man than he, was not to be obtained.
At Guilford, Rev. John Higginson added to his work
as teaching elder of the church, that of school-master
for the town. At a general court, Oct. 7, 1646, a com-
mittee was appointed to collect the contributions for the
maintenance of the elders, and "it was ordered that
the additional sum toward Mr. Higginson's maintenance
with respect to the school shall be paid by the treasurer
out of the best of the rates in due season according to
our agreements." As it was at the same time further
ordered " that whoever shall put any child to school to
Mr. Higginson, shall not put for less than a quarter's
time at once, and so all shall be reckoned with quarterly,
though they have neglected to send them all the time,
after the rate of four shillings per quarter, by the treas-
urer," we may infer that the school was not free to
those who sent their children, though a fixed salary
was assured to the master by the town. When Mr.
Higginson, after Mr. Whitfield's departure, became the
only elder of the church, other persons were succes-
sively employed as school-masters. Jeremiah Peck,
afterward an ordained minister, was school-master from
1656,' — in which year he was married to a young lady
of Guilford, — to 1660, when he removed to New Haven
to take charge of the grammar school established in
that year by the colony.
According to Lambert, "the first school in Milford
was kept by Jasper Gunn, the physician ; *' and the colo-
nial records in 1657 preface an order, that "endeavors
shall be used that a school-master shall be procured in
270 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
every plantation where a school is not already set
up/* with the statement that New Haven hath provided
that a school-master be maintained at the town's charge,
and Milford hath made provision in a comfortable way." '
These town schools were chiefly intended for such
as could remain long enough "to make Latin." The
teachers were men of liberal education, and were pro-
cured to teach, because they were capable of teaching
something more and higher than the rudiments of
learning. In every plantation there were inhabitants
who could teach children as much as the law required
that they should learn, which, as we have seen, was at
first only reading.
To show, that, as the colony grew in years it required
a greater minimum of scholarship, we cite the addition
made by the General Court in 1660 to the law requiring
that all children should be taught to read. "To the
printed law concerning the education of children, it is
now added that the sons of all the inhabitants within
this jurisdiction shall (under the same penalty) be
learned to write a legible hand so soon as they are capa-
ble of it." The reader should take notice, however, that
the earlier order refers to all children and apprentices,
and the later to boys only. The standard to which Mr.
Davenport would have brought the people by moral
suasion, if not by authority of law, was even higher
than that enforced by the court ; for, when he delivered
' The omission of Guilford in this mention of towns which in Mav,
1657, were maintaining schools, leads me to think that Mr. Peck com-
menced his school in 1657 ; but I have allowed the date of his commence-
ment to remain as it is in Sibley's Harvard Graduates. Perhaps he
commenced as the master of a private school.
LEARNING, 2/1
up all his power and interest as a trustee of Mr. Hop-
kins's bequest in aid of a college, he embraced the oppor-
tunity to express his desire "that parents will keep
such of their sons constantly to learning in the schools
whom they intend to train up for public serviceable-
ness ; and that all their sons may learn, at the least, to
write and cast up accounts competently, and may make
some entrance into the Latin tongue.** As this com-
munication was made at the meeting when the ordei
was passed requiring that boys should be taught to
write, it would seem that the freemen were moved by
Mr. Davenport's communication to pass the order, but
did not think it expedient to require arithmetic and
Latin.
It was designed from the beginning, that "a small
college should be settled in New Haven." ' In laying
' While they looked forward to the establishment of a college at home,
the people of New Haven in 1644 appointed collectors to "receive of every
one in this plantation whose heart is willing thereunto, a peck of wheat
or the value of it," for " the relief of poor scholars at the college at Cam-
bridge." The amount of this contribution may be learned from the fol-
lowing record in 1645. "Mr. Atwater, the present treasurer, informed
the court that he had sent from Connecticut forty bushels of wheat for
the college, by Goodman Codman, for the last year's gift of New Haven,
although he had not received so much." This contribution of college corn
became an annual institution, though sometimes there was less enthusiasm
than at first. In 1647 "^^c governor propounded that the college com
might be forthwith paid, considering that the work is a service to Christ
to bring up young plants for his service, and besides it will be a re-
proach that it shall be said New Haven is fallen off from this service.**
A few weeks later " it was desired that as men had formerly engaged
themselves to contribute a portion of corn to the college, that they would
not now be slack in carrj'ing it to the collectors, but that within seven or
eight days at farthest those that are behind would pay, for it is a service
to Christ, and may yield precious fruit to the colonies hereafter, being that
272 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
out their town the freemen reserved the tract called
"Oyster-shell Field" "for the use and benefit of a
college," and in March, 1648, directed a committee,
empowered to dispose of vacant lots " to consider and
reser\'e what lot they shall see meet and most commo-
dious for a college, which they desire may be set up
as soon as their ability will reach thereunto." The
subject had been brought before the General Court for
the jurisdiction, at least as early as 1652 ; for the town
of Guilford voted in June of that year : — " That the
matter about a college at New Haven is thought to be
190 great a charge for us of this jurisdiction to undergo
alone, especially considering the unsettled state of New
Haven town, being publicly declared from the delib-
erate judgment of the most understanding men to be
a place of no comfortable subsistence for the present
inhabitants there ; but if Connecticut do join, the
planters are generally willing to bear their just propor-
tions for erecting and maintaining a college there.
However, they desire thanks to Mr. Goodyear for his
proffer to the setting forward of such a work." The
records of the jurisdiction for that year having been
lost, we are indebted to an allusion to this offer twelve
years afterward by Mr. Davenport in sonie remarks in
a town meeting, for the knowledge that the offer of
Mr. Goodyear alluded to by the Guilford people was an
offer to give his house and home-lot for the use of the
college.
Notwithstanding the damper which Guilford put upon
the commissioners have taken order that none should have the benefit
of it but those that shall remain in the country for the service of the
same."
LEARNING, 2/3
the attempt to set up a college, the people of New
Haven continued to hope, and about two years after-
ward again agitated the subject. At a general court
May 22, 1654, "the town was informed that there is
some motion again on foot concerning the setting up
of a college here at New Haven, which, if attained,
will in all likelihood prove very beneficial to this place ;
but now it is only propounded to know the town's
mind, and whether they are willing to further the
work by bearing a meet proportion of charge, if the
jurisdiction, upon the proposal thereof, shall see cause
to carry it on. No man objected, but all seemed will-
ing, provided that the pay which we can raise here,
will do it.'* The next year, at a general court May 21,
1655, the subject was "revived; and in some respects
this seems to be a season, some disturbance being at
present at the college in the Bay,' and it is now in-
' The disturbance at Harvard College alluded to was occasioned by
the outburst of President Dunster's long pent-up conviction that infant
baptism was unscriptural. Probably some of the leading men at New
Haven were aware, when in the preceding year they made a motion
for setting up a college, that a storm was brewing at Cambridge ; for
about three weeks previously the General Court of Massachusetts had
commended to the " pious consideration and special care of the officers
of the college and the selectmen of the several towns not to permit or
suffer any such to be continued in the office or place of teaching, edu-
cating, or instructing of youth or child in the college or schools, that have
manifested themselves unsound in the faith or scandalous in their lives,
and not giving due satisfaction according to the rules of Christ ; forasmuch
as it greatly concerns the welfare of the country that the youth thereof
be educated not only in good literature, but sound doctrine." Mr. Dav-
enport and Mr. Hooke knew what this meant as well as President Dunster
himself, who resigned in the following month. When it was publicly
mentioned in town meeting at New Haven that there had been some dis-
turbance in the college at the Bay, the college had been eleven months
without a president.
274 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLOXY,
tended to be propounded to the General Court : there-
fore this to^Ti may declare what they will do by way
of encouragement for the same ; and it would be well if
they herein give a good example to the other towns in
the jurisdiction, being free in so good a work." Mr.
Davenport and Mr. Hooke were both present upon this
occasion, and "spake much to encourage the work ; " and
a committee was appointed "to go to the several plant-
ers in this town, and take from them what they will
freely give to this work." On the 30th of the same
month, at a general court for the jurisdiction : —
" The governor remembered the court of some purposes which
have formerly been to set up a college at New Haven; and in-
formed them that now again the motion is renewed, and, that the
deputies might be prepared to speak to it, letters were sent to the
plantations to inform them that it would now be propounded. He
acquainted them also that New Haven has in a free way of con-
tribution raised above three hundred pounds to encourage the
work, and now desired to know what the other towns will do. The
magistrate and deputies from Mijford declared, that, if the work
might comfortably be carried on, their town would give one hun-
dred pounds ; but those from the other towns seemed not prepared,
as not having taken a right course, and therefore desired further
time to speak with their towns again, and take the same course
New Haven hath done, and they will then return answer : and for
a committee to receive these accounts, and upon receipt of them
to consider whether it be meet to carrj- on the work, and how ; and
whatever considerations and conclusions mav be meet for the fur-
therance of it ; they agree that each town choose some whom they
will entrust therein, and send them to New Haven upon Tuesday
come fortnight, which wnll be the 19th of June, to meet in the after-
noon, by whom also they promise to send the account, what their
several towns will jaise. for, the work; the major part of which com-
mittee meeting, and the major j)art of them agreeing, shall conclude
what shall be done in this business."
LEARNING. 2/5
The time was not ripe, however, for setting up a
college ; and these endeavors produced no substantial
fruit except a bequest in aid of the intended college,
whicli Mr. Hopkins made at the solicitation of Mr.
Davenport. In May, 1659, however, Mr. Hopkins being
now deceased, the General Coyrt of the jurisdiction took
action for establishing a grammar school for the colony,
being probably stimulated thereto by the desire to
secure Mr. Hopkins's bequest for such an institution of
learning as it was possible for them to establish, since
they could not compass a college. The order of the
Court reads as follows ; viz. : —
"The Court looking upon it as their great duty to establish
some course (that, through the blessing of God), learning may be
promoted in the jurisdiction as a means for the fitting of instru-
ments for public service in church and commonwealth, did order
that £\o a year shall be paid by the treasurer for the furtherance
of a grammar school for the use of the inhabitants of the juris-
diction, and that £fi more shall be disbursed by him for the pro-
curing of books of Mr. Blinman,' such as shall be approved by
Mr. Davenport and Mr. Pierson* as suitable for this work. The
appointing of the place where this school shall be settled, the per-
son or persons to be employed, the time of beginning, &c., is
referred to the governor, deputy-governor, the magistrates, and
ministers settled in the jurisdiction, or so many of them as upon
due notice shall meet to consider of this matter. The deputy-
governor, with the deputies of Guilford, did propound Mr. Whit-
* Rev. Richard Blinman, " after he had labored about ten years in the
ministry at New London, removed to New Haven in 1658. After a short
stay in that town, he took shipping, and returned to England." — TruM'
bully vol. i., chap. 13. The New Haven town records show that he assisted
Mr. Davenport in the work of the ministry after Mr. Hooke left and be-
fore Mr. Street came.
* Rev. Abraham Pierson of Branford.
276 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
field's house ' freely for the furtherance of this work, who did also
declare that they judged it reasonable that if the said school should
be settled in any other place by those who are appointed to deter-
mine this question, that the like allowance should be made by that
plantation where it falls, answerable to what by Guilford is now
propounded."
More than a year, however, elapsed after this order
was passed before the colony school went into operation.
Meantime Mr. Davenport, having agreed with the other
surviving trustees of Mr. Hopkins what part of his
bequest should inure to the benefit of New Haven,
transferred to the court of magistrates his rights as
a trustee to receive and manage this part of the be-
quest : —
" At a court of magistrates held at New Haven, May 28, 1660,
Mr. John Davenport, pastor to the church of Christ at New Haven,
delivered into the hands of the court, to be kept for the use of the
magistrates and elders of this colony, as is specified in his writing
to them, certain writings concerning a trust committed to himself
with some others, for the disposal of an estate given by the wor-
shipful Edward Hopkins, Esquire, deceased, for tlie furtherance
of learning in these parts, with resignation of his power and inter-
est therein, so far as he might with preser\'ing in himself the
power committed to him for the discharge of his trust (which is
more fully and particularly expressed in the records of the General
Court), which was thankfully accepted.^'
A few days aften.vard, a general court for the juris-
' The house thus offered by Gov. Leete and the Guilford deputies is
still standing near the railway-station in Guilford. Its appearance and its
internal arrangements have been somewhat changed, however, by altera-
tions made in 1S6S. Mr. Ralph D. Smith's description of it, as it was in
1859, may be found in this volume, in the chapter on domestic and social
life, and in Palfrey*s History of New England.
LEARNING. 277
diction was held at New Haven, the record of which
contains the following document : —
" Quod felix, faustumque sit !
"On the fourth day of the fourth month, 1660, John Davenport,
pastor to the church of Christ at New Haven, presented to the
Honored General Court at New Haven as followeth : —
"MEMORANDUM.
" I. That sundry years past it was concluded by the said General
Court that a small college, such as the day of small things will
permit, should be settled in New Haven, for the education of youth
in good literature, to fit them for public services in church and
commonwealth, as it will appear in the public records.
" 2. Hereupon the said John Davenport wrote unto our honored
friend, Edward Hopkins, Esq., then living in London, the result of
those consultations ; in answer whereunto the said Edward Hop-
kins wrote unto the said John Davenport a letter, dated the thirtieth
of the second month, called April, 1656, beginning with these
words: *Most dear sir, the long-continued respects I have re-
ceived from you, but especially the speakings of the Lord to my
heart by you, have put me under deep obligation to love and a
return of thanks beyond what I ever have or can express,' &c.
Then after other passages (which, being secrets, hinder me from
showing his letter), he added a declaration of his purpose in ref-
erence to the college about which I wrote unto him : * That which
the Lord hath given me in those parts, I ever designed the great-
est part of it for the furtherance of the work of Christ in those
ends of the earth ; and, if 1 understand that a college is begun
and like to be carried on at New Haven for the good of posterity,
I shall give some encouragement thereunto.' These are the very
words of his letter, but
"3. Before Mr. Hopkins could return an answer to my next
letter, it pleased God to finish his days in this world. Therefore,
by his last will and testament (as the copy thereof transcribed and
attested by Mr. Thomas Yale doth show), he committed the whole
trust of disposing of his estate in these countries, — after some
personal legacies were paid out, — unto the public uses mentioned,
278 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
and bequeathed it to our late honored governor, Theophilus Eaton,
Esq., his father-in-law, and to the aforesaid John Davenport, and
joined ^*nth them in the same trust Capt. John Cullick and Mr.
William Goodwin.
"4. It having pleased the Most High to afflict this colony
greatly by taking from it to himself our former ever-honored gov-
ernor, Mr. Eaton, the surviving trustees and legatees met together
to consider what course they should take for the discharge of their
trust, and agreed that each of them should have an inventory of
the aforesaid testator's estate in New England, in houses and
goods and lands (which were prized by some in Hartford intrusted
by Capt Cullick and Mr. Goodwin), and in debts, for the gather-
ing-in whereof some attorneys were constituted, empowered, and
employed, by the three sur\'iving trustees, as the writing in the
magistrates' hands will show.
"5. Afterward at another meeting of the said trustees, they
considering that by the will of the dead they are joined together
in one common trust, agreed to act with mutual consent in per-
formance thereof, and considering that by the will of the testator
two of New Haven were joined with two of Hartford, and that Mr.
Hopkins had declared his puqxjse to further the college intended
at New Haven, they agreed that one-half of that estate which
should be gathered in, should be paid unto Mr. Davenport for
New Haven ; the other half to Capt. Cullick and Mr. Goodwin, to
be improved for the uses and ends forcnoted, where they should
have power to perform their trust; which, because they could not
expect to have at Hartford, they concluded would be best done by
them in that new plantation unto which sundry of Hartford were
to remove and were now gone; yet they agreed that out of the
whole, an ;£ioo should be given to the college at Cambridge in the
Bay, the estate being ;^ 1,000, as Capt. Cullick believed it would
be, which we how see cause to doubt, by reason»of the sequestra-
tions laid upon that estate and still continued by the General Court
at Hartford, whereupon some refuse to pay their debts, and others
forsake the purchases they had made, to their great hinderance of
performing the will of the deceased according to the trust com-
mitted to them, and to the endamagement of the estate.
" 6. The said John Davenport acquainted the other two trustees
LEARNING, 279
with his purpose to interest the honored magistrates and elders of
this colony in the disposal of that part of the estate that was, by
their agreement, to be paid thereunto, for promoting the college-
work in a gradual way, for the education of yduth in good litera-
ture, so far as he might with preserving in himself the power com-
mitted to him for the discharge of his trust. They consented
thereunto. Accordingly on the election day, it being the thirtieth
day of the third month, he delivered up into the hands of the
honored governor and magistrates, the writings that concern this
business (viz., the copy of Mr. Hopkins's last will and testament,
and the inventory of his estate in New England, and the appraise-
ment of his goods, and the writings signed by the surviving
trustees for their attorneys, and some letters between the other
trustees and himself), adding also his desire of some particulars
for the well performing of the trust, as followeth : —
" 1. He desireth of New Haven Town, First, That the retit of
the oyster-shell field, formerly separated and reserved for the use
and benefit of a college, be paid from this time forward toward
the making of some stock for disbursement of necessary charges
towards the college till it be set up, and afterward to continue for
a yearly rent as belonging to it, under the name and title of college
land.
^^ Secondly, That if no place can be found more convenient, Mrs.
Eldred's lot be given for the use of the college and of the colony
grammar school, if it be in this town, else only for the college.
" Thirdly, That parents will keep such of their sons constantly
to learning in the schools whom they intend to train up for public
serviceableness, and that all their sons may learn, at the least, to
write and cast up accounts competently, and may make some
entrance into the Latin tongue.
" Fourthly, That if the colony settle £^\o per annum for a com-
mon school, and^hall add an ;^ 100 to be paid toward the building
or buying of a school-house and library in this town, seeing thereby
this town will be freed from the charges which they have been at
hitherto to maintain a town school, they would consider what part
of their former salary may be still continued for future supplies
toward a stock for necessary expenses about the college or school.
"II. He humbly desireth the honored General Court of the
28o HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
colony of New Haven, Firsts That the £\o per annum formerly
agreed upon to be paid by the several plantations for a common
grammar school be now settled in one of the plantations, which
they shall judge fittest, and that a school-master may forthwith be
provided to teach the three languages, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew,
so far as shall be necessary to prepare them for the college,
and that, if it can be accomplished, that such a school-master be
settled by the end of this summer or the beginning of winter, the
payments from the several plantations may begin from this time.
*'*^ Secondly^ That, if the common school be settled in this town,
the honored governor, magistrates, elders, and deputies would
solemnly and together visit the grammar school, once ever)- }-ear
at the court for elections, to examine the scholars* proficiency in
learning.
" Thirdfyy That for the pa\-ments to be made by the plantations
for the school, or out of Mr. Hopkins's estate toward the college,
one be chosen by themselves, under the name and title of steward
or receiver for the school and college, to whom such payments
may be made, with full power given him by the court to demand
what is due and to prosecute in case of neglect, and to give
acquittances in case of due pa}'ments received, and to give his
account yearly to the court, and to dispose of what he receiveth in
such provisions as cannot be well kept, in the best way for the
aforesaid uses, according to advice.
^^ Fourthly^ That unto that end a committee of church-members
be chosen, to meet together and consult and ad\nse in emergent,
difiicult cases, that may concern the school or college, and which
cannot be well delayed till the meeting of the General Court, the
governor being always the chief of that committee.
^'^ Fifthly^ The said John Davenport desireth that while it may
please God to continue his life and abode in this place (to the end
that he may the better perform his trust in reference to the col-
lege), he be always consulted in difficult cases, and have the power
of a negative vote, to hinder any thing from being acted which he
shall prove by good reason to be prejudicial to the true intend-
ment of the testator, and to the true end of this work.
" Sixthly, That certain orders be speedily made for the school,
and, when the college shall proceed, for it also, that the education
LEARNING, 28 1
of youth may be carried on suitably to Christ's ends, by the coun-
sel of the teaching elders in this colony ; and that what they shall
conclude with consent, being approved by the honored magistrates,
be ratified by the General Court.
^*' Se^fenthly^ Because it is requisite that the writings which con-
cern Mr. Hopkins's estate be safely kept, in order thereunto the
said John Davenport desireth that a convenient chest be made,
with two locks and two keys, and be placed in the house of the
governor or of the steward, in some safe room, till a more public
place (as a library or the like) may be prepared, and that one key
be in the hand of the governor, the other in the steward's hand ;
that in this chest all the writings now delivered by him to the
magistrates may be kept, and all other bills, bonds, acquittances,
orders, or whatsoever writings that may concern this business, be
put and kept there ; and that some place may be agreed on where
the steward or receiver may lay up such provisions as may be paid
in, till they may be disposed of for the good of the school or
college.
^^ Eighthly^ Because our sight is narrow and weak in viewing
and discerning the compass of things that are before us, much more
in foreseeing future contingencies, he further craveth liberty for
himself and other elders of this colony to propound to the honored
governor and magistrates what hereafter may be found to be con-
ducive to the well carrj'ing on of this trust according to the ends
proposed, and that such proposals may be added unto these, under
the name and title of Useful Additioxals, and confirmed by
the General Court.
^^ Lastly, He hopeth he shall not need to add what he expressed
by word of mouth, that the honored General Court will not suffer
this gift to be lost from the colony, but, as it becometh Fathers of
the Commonwealth, will use all good endeavors to get it into their
hands, and to assert their right in it for the common good, that
posterity may reap the good fruit of their labors and wisdom and
faithfulness, and that Jesus Christ may have the service and honor
of such provision made for his people, in whom I rest.
"To these motions 1 desire that the answer of the Court,
together with this writing, may be kept among the records for the
school and college.
John Davenport."
282 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
To this communication the General Court responded
as follows : —
" The Court being deeply sensible of the small progress or pro-
ficiency in learning that hath yet been accomplished in the way of
more particular town schools of later years in this colony, and of
/ the great difficulty and charge to make pay, &c^ for the maintain-
' ing children at the schools or college in the Bay, and that notwith-
standing what this Court did order last year or formerly, nothing
hath yet been done to attain the ends desired, upon which consid-
erations and other like, this Court for further encouragement of
this work doth now order that, over and above the ^£40 per an-
num, granted the last year for the end then declared, £\oo stock
shall be duly paid in from the jurisdiction treasur}*, according to
the manner and times agreed and expressed in the court records,
giving and granting that special respect to our brethren at New
Haven, to be first in embracing or refusing the court's encourage-
ment or provision for a school, whether to be settled at New
Haven town or not ; but if they shall refuse, Milford is to have the
next choice, then Guilford, and so in order every other town on
the main within the jurisdiction have their liberty to accept or
refuse the court's tender ; yet it is most desired of all that New
Haven would accept the business, as being a place most probable
to advantage the well carr}'ing on of the school for the ends sought
after and endeavored after thereby ; but the college after spoken
of is affixed to New Haven, if the Lord shall succeed that under-
taking. It is further agreed that all and every plantation who have
any mind to accept the propositions about the school, shall prepare
and send in their answer unto the committee chosen of all the
magistrates and settled elders of this jurisdiction, to order, regu-
late, and dispose all matters concerning the school (as the provid-
ing instruments and well carr}'ing on of the business) from time to
time as they shall judge best, before the 24th of June instant,
that so if any plantation do accept, the committee may put forth
their endeavors to settle the business : but if all refuse, then it
must be suspended until another meeting of this General Court.
*'And for further encouragement of learning and the good of
posterity in that way, Mr. John Davenport, pastor of the Church
LEARNING. 283
of Christ, at New Haven, presented a writing, as before appears,
whereby and wherewith he delivered up all his power and interest
as a trustee by Mr. Hopkins, for recovering and bestowing of all
that legacy given by him for the end of furtherance to the settle-
ment of a college at New Haven ; he also propounded therewith,
what he apprehends hath been granted and set apart by the town
of New Haven for the same end, with a request that matters there-
abouts might be ordered and carried on according to such proposi-
tions as are therein set down. All which the General Court took
thankfully, both from the donors and Mr. Davenport, and accepted
the trust, and shall endeavor by God's help to get in the said
estate and improve it to the end it was given for.
*' By way of further answer to what was propounded by Mr.
Davenport in his writing presented, the Court declared that it was
their desire that the colony school may begin at the time pro-
pounded, and to that end desire that endeavors may be put forth
by the committee of magistrates and settled elders formerly ap-
pointed, for the providing a school-master, &c., to whom also they
leave it to appoint a steward or receiver, which steward or receiver
they empower as is propounded, and to settle a committee from
among themselves to issue emergent cases, and to take order that
a chest be provided wherein the writings may be laid up that con-
cern this business. The Court further declared that they do invest
Mr. Davenport with the power of a negative vote, for the reason
and in the cases according to the terms in his writing specified,
and that they shall be ready to confirm such orders as shall be pre-
sented, which in the judgment of the Court shall be conducible to
the main end intended.
"It is ordered for encouragement of such as shall diligently
and constantly, to the satisfaction of the civil authority in each
plantation, apply themselves to due use of means for the attain-
ment of learning, which may fit them for public service, that they
shall be freed from payment of rates with respect to their persons ;
provided that if any such shall leave off, or not constantly attend
those studies, they shall then be liable to pay rates in all respects
as other men are.
**It is ordered that if the colony school shall begin any time
within the first half year from this court of election, that £\o shall
284 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
be paid by the treasurer for this year, and if it shall begin at any
time before the election next, that £10 shall be paid by the treas-
urer upon that account
" To the printed law concerning the education of children, it is
now added, that the sons of all the inhabitants within this jurisdic-
tion shall, under the same penalty, be learned to write a legible
hand, so soon as they are capable of it"
The next record concerning the colony school which
we find, was made. by the town of New Haven, and is
as follows : —
"1660, June 21 St
"The orders made by the General Court in May last, also a
writing of Mr. Davenport by him then delivered in to the General
Court concerning a school and college, were both read ; after which
the governor declared that formerly the Court had taken care that
\ schools of learning might be settled in the several plantations, but
i finding that means did not attain the end propounded, they have
now, as by their order read appears, provided for the settling of a
colony school (for teaching of Latin, Greek and Hebrew^ in some
one of the plantations, which they first tender to New Haven to
accept if they shall see cause so to do upon the encouragement
they have agreed upon ; viz., ;£ioo stock for the providing a house
for the master to live in and a school-house, and £^ per annum.
Sergeant Jeffrey desired that the town [ ] the compass of the
business. To which it was answered that it appears by the order
read, that the jurisdiction allows £\oo stock and £^\o per annum
for the salary ; but what it comes to more, that town which accepts
their tender must make up. After the business had been debated
and considered, it was, by the vote of the town, generally declared,
that upon the jurisdiction's encouragement, the school shall be
settled at New Haven. To which end, Mr. Gilbert, Lieutenant
Nash, Sergeant Munson, and John Cooper were appointed a com-
mittee to provide a house for the school-master and a school-house,
and therein to use their best discretion whether to buy or build,
so as may answer the end, yet with as good husbandry for the
town as may be."
1
LEARNING, 285
•
At the same court " it was also by the governor pro-
pounded concerning Oyster-shell Field, that as it hath
been from the first intended (as hath been often said)
for the use of a college, that it might now be actually
set apart for that use, as Mr. Davenport in his writing
hath desired, which was also debated ; and the town
generally showed their willingness, that if it shall please
God in his providence so to order it that a college be
settled and set up at New Haven, that then the Oyster-
shell Field shall be set apart for that use. But to do it
before that was not granted."
From the colony records we extract the following : —
"At a meeting of the committee for the school, June 28th, 1660,
there were present the governor,* the deputy-governor,* Mr. Treat,
Mr. Davenport, Mr. Street. It was agreed that Mr. Peck, now at
Guilford, should be school-master, and that it should begin in
October next, when his half-year expires there ; he is to keep the
school, to teach the scholars Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, and fit
them for the college ; and for the salar}% he knows the allowance
from the colony is £\o a year ; and for further treaties, they must
leave it to New Haven, where the school is ; and for further orders
concerning the school and well carrying it on, the elders will con-
sider of some against the court of magistrates in October next,
when things, as there is cause, may be further considered. Mr.
Crane and Mr. Pierson came after the business was concluded,
and what is above written was read to them, and they fully ap-
proved of it ; and after that, being read to Mr. Gilbert, he approved
of it also."
At a town meeting in New Haven, July 25 of the
same year, the governor communicated the action of
the committee as above, and "further informed that
upon the eleventh of July, Mr. Peck coming over him-
' Newman. " Leete.
286 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
self, with such of the court and townsmen as could be
got together, had a treaty with him, who propounded
that unto the ^40 per annum allowed by the jurisdic-
tion, ^10 per year, with a comfortable house for his
dwelling, and a school-house, and the benefit of such
scholars as are not of the jurisdiction, and such part
of the accommodations belonging to the house lately
purchased of Mr. Kitchel (at a moderate price), as he
shall desire, with some liberty of commonage, all which
the town now consented to, and by vote determined to
allow to Mr. Peck ; which the governor now promised
to give him information of."
According to the arrangement thus made, the colony
school went into operation in the autumn of 1660. At
the General Court held in May of the following year,
"there were sundry propositions presented by Mr.
Peck, school-master, to this court, as followeth : —
^^ First, That the master shall be assisted with the power and
counsel of any of the honored magistrates or reverend elders, as he
finds need, or the case may require. 2. That rec tores schola be now
appointed and established. 3. What is that the jurisdiction ex-
pects from the master ? Whether any thing besides instruction in
the languages and oratory? 4. That two indifferent men be ap-
pointed to prove and send to the master such scholars as be ntted
for his tuition. 5. That two men be appointed to take care of the
school, to repair and supply necessaries, as the case may require.
6. Whether the master shall have liberty to be at neighbors* meet-
ings once every week ? 7. Whether it may not be permitted that
the school may begin but at eight of the clock all the winter half-
year ? 8. That the master shall have liberty to use any books that
do or shall belong to the school. 9. That the master shall have
libertv to receive into and instruct in the school, scholars sent from
other places out of this jurisdiction, and that he shall receive the
benefit of them, over and above what the jurisdiction doth pay
LEARNING, 28/
him. 10. That the master may have a settled habitation, not at
his own charge, ii. That he shall have a week's vacation in the
year to improve, as the case may require. 12. That his person
and estate shall be rate-free in every plantation of this jurisdiction.
13. That half the year's payment shall be made to, and accounts
cleared with, the master, within the compass of every half year.
14. That ;^4o per annum be paid to the school-master by the juris-
diction treasurer, and that £\o per annuni be paid to him by New
Haven treasurer. 15. That the major part of the foresaid pay-
ments shall be made to the school-master in these particulars as
foUoweth ; viz., 30 bushels of wheat, 2 barrels of pork, and 2 bar-
rels of beef, 40 bushels of Indian corn, 30 bushels of pease, 2 fir-
kins of butter, 100 pounds of flax, 30 bushels of oats. Lastly^
That the honored Court would be pleased to consider of and settle
these things this court time, and to confirm the consequent of them,
the want of which things, especially some of them, doth hold the
master under discouragement and unsettlement ; yet these things
being suitably considered and confirmed, if it please the honored
Court further to improve him wlio at present is school-master, al-
though unworthy of any such respect, and weak for such a work,
yet his real intention is to give up himself to the work of a gram-
mar school, as it shall please God to give opportunity and assist-
ance.
" The Court, considering of these things, did grant as followeth ;
viz., to the second, they did desire and appoint Mr. John Daven-
port, sen., Mr. Street, and Mr. Pierson, to take that care and trust
upon them ; to the third, they declared that besides that which he
expressed, they expected he would teach them to write so far as
was necessary to his work ; to the fourth, they declared that they
left it to those before mentioned ; to the eighth, they declared that
he should have the use of those books, provided a list of them be
taken ; the ninth they left to the committee for the school ; and
the rest they granted in general, except the pork and butter, and
for that they did order that he should have one barrel of pork and
one firkin of butter, provided by the jurisdiction treasurer, though
it be with some loss to the jurisdiction, and that he should have
wheat for the other barrel of pork. This being done, Mr. Peck
seemed to be very well satisfied."
288 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
The school thus established continued only about
two years, being discontinued partly on account of the
paucity of scholars, and partly on account of the expense
of litigation with Connecticut concerning her assump-
tion of title to the territory of New Haven, which
threatened to exhaust the treasury. The vote to dis-
continue is thus recorded : —
" At a General Court held at New Haven, for the jurisdiction,
Nov. 5, 1662, it was propounded as a thing left to be issued at
the next General Court after May last, by the committee for the
school, whether they would continue the colony school or lay it
down. The business being debated, it came to this conclusion,
that, considering the distraction of the time, that the end is not
attained for which it was settled no way proportionable to the
charges expended, and that the colony is in expectation of una-
voidable necessary charges to be expended, did conclude to lay it
down, and the charges to cease when this half-year is up at the end
of this month."
How far the school came short of attaining the end
for which it was established, may be seen in the light
of some remarks made by Mr. Davenport in a town
meeting held the preceding August. " Mr. Davenport
further propounded to the town something about the
colony school, and informed them that the committee
for the school made it a great objection against the
keeping of it up, that this town did not send scholars
to it, only five or six ; now, therefore, if you would not
have that benefit taken away, you should send your chil-
dren to it constantly, and not take them off so often ;
and further said that he was in the school, and it
grieved him to see how few scholars were there."
The colony school being discontinued, the town of
LEARNING. 289
New Haven negotiated with George Pardee, one of
their own people, to teach the children " English, and
to carry them on in Latin so far as he could. The busi-
ness was debated, and some expressed themselves to
this purpose, that it is scarce known in any place to have
a free school for teaching English and writing, but yet
showed themselves willing to have something allowed
by the public, and the rest by the parents and masters
of such that went to school ; and in the issue twenty
pounds was propounded and put to vote, and by vote
concluded to be allowed to George Pardee for this year
out of the town treasury, and the rest to be paid by
those that sent scholars to the school, as he and they
could agree. This, George Pardee agreed to,- to make
trial of for one year. He was also advised to be care-
ful to instruct the youth in point of manners, there
being a great fault in that respect, as some expressed.'*
Our history of schools in the colony of New Haven
might here come to a conclusion, for, when the year
expired for which Mr. Pardee was engaged, the colony
of New Haven had become absorbed into the colony of
Connecticut, and thus lost not only its name but its
existence as a jurisdiction.
But it will not be deemed improper to add that within
two years after the union, the town of New Haven,
stimulated by its desire to secure to itself that part of
Gov. Hopkins's bequest which was in the power of
Mr. Davenport, established a "grammar or collegiate
school," and invited Mr. Samuel Street to be the school-
master. The town appropriated ;^30 per annum, and
the Hopkins estate in the hands of Mr. Davenport
yielded by this time ;^io more. A few months after-
290 HISTORY OF XEW HA VEX COLOXY.
ward, Mr. Davenport came into the town meeting, and
" desired to speak something concerning the school ;
and first propounded to the town whether they would
send their children to the school, to be taught for th^
fitting them for the service of God in church and com-
monwealth. If they would, then he said that the grant
of that part of Mr. Hopkins* estate formerly made to
this town stands good ; but if not, then it is void,
because it attains not the end of the donor. Therefore
he desired they would express themselves. Upon which
Roger Ailing declared his purpose of bringing up one
of his sons to learning ; also Henry Glover, one of Wil-
liam Russel's ; John Winston ; Mr. Hodson ; Thomas
Trowbridge ; David Atwater ; Thomas Mix ; and Mr.
Augur said that he intended to send for a kinsman from
England. Mr. Samuel Street declared that there were
eight at present in Latin, and three more would come
in in summer, and two more before next winter. Upon
which Mr. Davenport seemed to be satisfied, but yet
declared that he must always rescn-e a negative voice,
that nothing be done contrary to the true intent of the
donor, and that it be improved only for that use ; and
therefore, while it can be so improved here, it shall be
settled here ; but if New Haven will neglect their own
good herein, he must improve it otherwhere unto that
end that may answer the will of the dead."
As this declaration of Mr. Davenport was made in
February, 1668, and he removed to Boston some two or
three months afterward, having in the previous Septem-
ber received a call to the pastorate of the first church
there, it may be inferred that the people of New Haven
had some reason at that time to apprehend that they
LEARNING, 29 1
might lose the benefit of the Hopkins bequest. On the
1 8th of April, however, Mr. Davenport executed a deed
of trust, in which he conveyed unto "William Jones,
assistant of the colony of Connecticut, the Rev. Mr.
Nicholas Street, teacher of the church of Christ at New
Haven, Mr. Matthew Gilbert, Mr. John Davenport,
jun., and James Bishop, commissioned magistrates,
Deacons William Peck and Roger Ailing, and to
their successors," his interest in the Hopkins bequest ;
reserving " full power of a negative voice, while it shall
please God to continue my living and abiding in this
country or any part of it ; '* appending the condition
that the rent of Oyster-shell Field and of Mrs. Eldred*s
lot should be to the use of the school ; and declaring
null and void his former conveyance for the encourage-
ment of a "colony school," on the ground that the
colony school had been dissolved by the act of the
General Court of the colony of New Haven.*
The Hopkins Grammar School thus established, has,
with some intermissions which occurred early in its his-
tory, afforded to the boys of New Haven from that time
to the present day, opportunity " to be taught for the
fitting them for the service of God in church and com-
monwealth." It opens its doors so indiscriminately to
the children of all classes of people. Christian, Jewish,
and pagan, that the following action of the town may
perhaps awaken the risibles of the reader : —
"At a town meeting in New Haven, Dec. 9, 1728, Voted, That
the land lying in the governor's quarter in New Haven called the
Oyster-shell Field be put into the hand of the school committee
in New Haven commonly known by the name of Hopkins Com-
mittee, as they now be or hereafter shall be, according to their
* See Appendix V.
292 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY,
constitution or custom, by them to be improved for the upholding
and maintaining a grammar school in the first parish in this town.
for the educating of children of Congregational or Presbyterian
parents only, and no other use whatsoever forever hereafter : and
if it shall hereafter be thought most advantageous to make sale of
the lands commonly called the 0}'ster-shell Field as aforesaid, and
the major part of proprietors in this town shall agree thereto, the
money thereby produced shall be past into the hands of said com-
mittee to be improved as aforesaid, and to no other use whatso-
ever."
CHAPTER XIV.
MILITARY AFFAIRS.
EACH of the colonies of New England had its mil-
itary chieftain. A captain was as necessary as a
magistrate. Miles Standish came with the pilgrims
from Leyden to Plymouth ; but, so far as appears, he
came as a soldier rather than as a Separatist. He was a
man of pure morals, but never identified himself with
the church at Plymouth. It was not required in that
colony, as it was in Massachusetts ^.nd in New Haven,
that military officers should be church-members. Of
the expedition sent by Massachusetts against the Pe-
quots in 1636, John Endicott was chief captain ; John
Underbill, Nathanael Turner, and William Jenningson,
were subordinate captains ; and there were other infe-
rior officers. As the number of privates did not exceed
one hundred in number. Underbill, in his narrative of
the expedition, apologizes for the unusual proportion of
officers. " I would not have the world wonder at the
great number of commanders to so few men, but know
that the Indians* fight far differs from the Christian
practice, for they most commonly divide themselves into
small bodies ; so that we are forced to neglect our usual
way, and to subdivide our divisions to answer theirs,
and not thinking it any disparagement to any captain
293
294 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
to go forth against an enemy with a squadron of men,
taking the ground from the old and ancient practice
when they chose captains of hundreds and captains of
thousands, captains of fifties and captains of tens. We
conceive a captain signifieth the chief in way of com-
mand of any body committed to his charge for the time
being ; whether of more or less, it makes no matter in
power, though in honor it does."
Eaton and Davenport not knowing, when they left
England, that they should settle afar from their friends
in Massachusetts, had not been careful to bring with
them a military chief. During the winter they spent at
the Bay they found a valuable accession to their com-
pany in Nathanael Turner, one of the three captains of
the first Pequot expedition who were subordinate only
to Endicott. Having lost his house at Lynn (then called
Sagus) by fire, in Januar)% 1637, " with all that was in it
save the persons," he was free to listen to proposals
from a company, which, with large resources, proposed
to settle at Quinnipiac. He listened, and was persuaded
to take part in the responsibilities and rewards of the
undertaking. Capt. Turner was invested with mili-
tary command at Quinnipiac during the time of the
provisional authority which preceded the permanent
settlement of civil affairs in the plantation ; for, on the
25th of November, 1639, only thirty days after the
organization of the court, and, so far as appears on
the record, before any appointment of militar)- oflficcrs
had been made, it was " ordered that ever)* one that
bears arms shall be completely furnished with arms ;
viz., a musket, a sword, bandoleers, a rest, a pound of
powder, twenty bullets fitted to their musket, or four
MILITARY AFFAIRS, 2g$
pounds of pistol-shot or swan-shot at least, and be ready
to show them in the market-place upon Monday, the
1 6th of this (sic) month, before Capt. Turner and
Lieut. Seeley, under the penalty of twenty shillings
fine for every default or absence.'*
On the first day of September following, " Mr. Turner
was chosen captain to have the command and ordering
of all martial affairs of this plantation, as setting and
ordering of watches, exercising and training of soldiers,
and whatsoever of like nature appertaining to his office ;
all which he is to do with all faithfulness and diligence,
and be ready at all times to do whatsoever service the
occasions of the to,wn may require." This seems to
have been a permanent appointment ; for he continued
in office, till, having determined to visit the mother
country, he had embarked in Lamberton's vessel. Then
"the governor propounded whether the military affairs of
the town may be comfortably carried on without a cap-
tain, or whether it were not convenient to choose a cap-
tain instead of Capt. Turner, not knowing when he will
return. After some debate, Mr. Malbon was chosen
captain, with liberty to resign his place to Capt. Turner
at his return."
Robert Seeley, above mentioned as lieutenant before
the adoption of the fundamental agreement, was for-
mally elected to that oflfice Aug. 6, 1642. In 1649 he
asked the town to excuse him from further service, but
the Court was unwilling to do so ; and " it was pro-
pounded that the men in the town would underwrite
what they would give toward the maintenance of Lieut.
Seeley in his place." Before the settlement of New
Haven, Seeley had been the lieutenant of Capt. Mason
296 HISTORY OF XEIV If A TEX COLOATY.
in the expedition from Connecticut against the Pe-
quots in 1637. He had passed Quinnipiac in the
chase of the Pequots westward, and, unless Turner was
with him in that pursuit, had been the first of those
who soon afterward settled there as planters to set his
eyes on its hills and meadows, its creeks, rivers, and
fair haven.
Soon after the inspection of arms appointed in No-
vember, 1639, it was ordered that a similar inspection
should take place quarterly ; and it was defined that
"every one that beareth arms" meant "ever)' male
from sixteen to sixty years of age, who shall dwell or
sojourn within this plantation or any part of the bounds
and limits of it for a month together." The number of
persons thus made subject to militar)' duty was in 1642
not less than two hundred and seventeen, as there were
then thirty-one watches, each consisting of seven men.
The whole company was divided into four squadrons,
each commanded by a sergeant ; and the squadrons
being trained in succession, one on Saturday of each
week for four weeks, there was ever)' fifth week a gen-
eral training of the whole company, which occurred
always on Monday. The squadron-training was omitted
that week. At a later date the number of general train-
ings was reduced to six in a year ; and after the organ-
ization, in 164S, of a volunteer artillery company, whose
members were exempt from squadron-training, the four
squadrons were exercised two at once, and only required
to train each six times a year.
Besides the oflScers alreadv mentioned, "the trained
band " had an ensign, four sergeants, and four corporals.
In 1642 the ensign, or antient as he was usually styled,
MILITARY AFFAIRS. 297
was Francis Newman, afterward governor of the juris-
diction. The sergeants contemporary with him were
William Andrews, Thomas Munson, John Clark, and
Thomas Jeffrey ; and the corporals were Thomas Kim-
berley, John Moss, John Nash, and Samuel Whitehead.
Fines for absence and late-coming, whether on days
of general training or on squadron days, were given up
to the military officers and company for their encourage-
ment, " to be disposed in powder and shot, that they
may set up marks to shoot at, or may furnish themselves
for their military exercises." A portion of Oyster-shell
Field was set apart for "a shooting-place ;" and here, on
training-days, the soldiers were exercised in target
practice.
The arms which the militia were required to show
were, in the revision of the orders, specified as " a good
serviceable gun, a good sword, bandoleers, a rest, all to
be allowed by the military officers ; one pound of good
gunpowder, four pounds of bullets, either fitted for his
gun, or pistol bullets, with four fathom of match fit
for service with every matchlock, and four or five good
flints fitted for every firelock piece, all in good order, and
ready for any sudden occasion, service, or view." The
order makes it indifferent whether the gun be a match-
lock or a firelock ; only if the soldier have a firelock, he
must be furnished with a sufficiency of flints, and if his
gun is a matchlock, he must have a sufficiency of match.
Any musket of the seventeenth century would seem to
us ludicrously inferior to those with which modern
soldiers arc provided ; but even the matchlock gave its
possessor, so long as he had a rest and a match, im-
mense superiority over an enemy destitute of fire-arms.
298 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
The muskets of that day had no bayonet ; but sol-
diers were sometimes exercised in the use of the pike,
a weapon consisting of a long wooden shaft pointed
with steel. New Haven, while requiring each soldier
to be equipped with a musket at his own cost, provided
pikes at the public expense.
"It is ordered that a convenient company and number of pikes
be provided at the town's charge, that the militarj' and artillery
companies may be trained and exercised in the use of them, but
no man hereby to be freed from providing, and at all times continu-
ing furnished, with all other arms, powder, and shot, as before ex-
pressed ; and that a chest be made in some convenient place in the
meeting-house, to keep the said pikes from warping or other hurt
or decay. And Thomas Munson and the rest of the sergeants
undertook to have it done without delay: and Mr. Pearce was
appointed to give out and lay up the pikes from time to time, that
they receive no damage betwixt times of ser\'ice ; and in considera-
tion hereof and of some bodily weakness, he is at present freed
from training, and allowed to provide a man to watch for him.'*
In respect to defensive armor, the following order
gives information : " It is ordered that when canvas
and cotton-wool may conveniently be had, due notice
and warning shall be given ; and then every family
within the plantation shall accordingly provide and
after continue furnished with a coat well made, and
so quilted with cotton-wool as may be fit for ser\'ice,
and a comfortable defence against Indian arrows ; and
the tailors about the town shall consider and advise
how to make them, and take care that they be done
without unnecessary delay."
Capt. Turner was by virtue of his office chief cap-
tain of the watch, appointing the watch-masters and
designating the watchmen to be subject to each, though
MILITARY AFFAIRS. 299
not without the approval of the magistrates. "It is
ordered that a constant and strict watch shall be kept
every night in this plantation from the first of March
to the last of October every year ordinarily, leaving
extraordinary cases, either of mildness or of sharpness
of weather or times of danger, to the governor and
magistrates, who may remit or continue the watch
longer, or increase and order them as seasons and occa-
sions may require. But in the ordinary course the
watch is every night to consist of one intrusted as
master of the watch (who is diligently to attend and
obsen^e all the orders made by this court for the watch
while they remain in force), and of six other watchmen.
This watch-master is to be appointed yearly, and the six
watchmen to be sorted, as may be most convenient in
respect of their dwellings, by the captain, with approba-
tion of the magistrates. But if by death, -remove, or
any other occasion, after the watches are settled in
their course for the year, a breach be made, and so
cause of an alteration, the captain shall with all con-
venient speed order and settle them again, so as may
be most convenient for the town, and shall give sea-
sonable warning to all the watch-masters whom it con-
cerneth, that the service may go on without interruption
or disorder."
What the orders for the watch were, may be learned
from the following record : " At a court holden the
3d of June, 1640, all the masters of the watches received
their charge and orders as followeth : —
" I. The drummer is to beat the drum at the going down of
the sun.
"2. The master of the watch is to be at the court of gtiard
3CX> HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
within half an hour after the setting of the sun, with his' arms
complete.
"3. All the watchmen are to be there within an hour after
the setting of the sun, with their arms complete and their guns
ready charged ; and if any of them come after the time appointed,
or be defective in their arms, they are to pay one shilling fine ; for
total absence five shillings fine. And if the master of the watch
transgress, either in late coming, defectiveness in arms, or total
absence, his fine is to be double to the watchmen's fine in like
case.
'" 4. The master of the watch is to set the watch an hour after
sunset, dividing the night into three watches, sending forth two
and two together to walk their turns, as well without the town as
within the town and the suburbs also, and to bring to the court of
guard any person or persons whom they shall find disorderly or in
a suspicious manner within doors or ^vithout, whether English or
Indians, or any other strangers whatsoever, and keep them there
safe until the morning, and then bring them before one of the
magistrates. If the watchmen in any part of their watch see any
apparent common danger which they cannot otherwise prevent or
stop, then they are to make an alarm by discharging their two
guns, which are to be answered by him that stands at the door to
keep sentinel, and that also seconded by beating of the drum.
And if the danger be by fire, then with the alarm the watchmen
are to oxyfire^fire. And if it be by the discover}- of an enemy,
then they are to cry arm^ arm, all the town over, yet so as to leave
a guard at the court of guard.
" 5. The master is to take care that one man alwavs stand sen-
tinel in a sentinel posture without the watch-house, to hearken dili-
gently after the watchmen, and see that no man come near the
watch-house or court of guard ; no, not those of the present watch
who have been walking the round, but that he require them to
stand, and call forth the master of the watch to question, proceed,
or receive them, as he shall see cause. The master of the watch
is also to see that none of the watchmen sleep at all, and that none
of their guns remain uncharged till the watch break up (and then
they may discharge), and also that no man lay aside his arms while
the watch continues.
MILITARY AFFAIRS, 3OI
" 6. Every master of the watch in his course is to warn both his
own watch and the master of the succeeding watch, four and twenty
hours before they are to watch, and not to do it slightly, but either
to do it themselves or to leave the warning with some sufficient
for such a trust.
''^Lastly, If any master of the watch shall fail either in the
warning or ordering of the watch in any of the forenamed particu-
lars, or shall break up the watch in the morning before it have
been full half an hour daylight, or neglect to complain to one
of the magistrates of the neglects or defects of any of the watch-
men, he is to be fined by the court according to the quality of his
offence."
In 1645 "it is ordered that the market-place be forth-
with cleared, and the wood carried to the watch-house,
and there piled for the use and succor of the watch in
cold weather, and the care of this business is committed
to the four sergeants." From a record four years later
it appears that this work of clearing the market-place
was to be performed by the inhabitants, each working
in his turn either personally or by proxy; that some
trees were then still standing; and that some of the
inhabitants had not yet done their share of the labor.
Probably a wood-pile had been provided sufficient for
"the use and succor '* of the watch for four years ; after
the lapse of which time "it was propounded that some
wood might be provided for the watch. The sergeants
were desired to inquire who hath not wrought in the
market-place, that they might cut some wood out, and
in the meantime the treasurer was to provide a load."
"In 1647 it was propounded that men would clear
wood and stones from their pale sides, that the watch-
men in dark nights might the more safely walk the
rounds without hurt thereby."
302 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
On sabbath and lecture days and other days ordinary
and extraordinary, of solemn worship, the watch was
kept as at night.
" Tl)e sentinels and they that walk the round in their course,
shall diligently attend their trust and duty, and shall have their
matches lighted during the time of meeting, if they serve with
matchlock pieces."
At first all who belonged to the watch, that is to say
all persons subject to military ser\^ice, were required to
come every Lord's day to the meeting completely armed ;
and all other adult males were required to bring their
swords, " no man exempted save Mr. Eaton, our pastor,
Mr. James, Mr. Samuel Eaton, and the two deacons."
Afterward, when the military company had been divided
into four squadrons, it was ordered that one squadron
in its course should come to public worship with arms
complete, and "be at the meeting-house before the
second drum hath left beating, their guns ready charged
with a fit proportion of match for matchlocks, and flints
ready fitted in their firelock pieces, and shot and powder
for five or six charges at least." Such an order must
have secured for each service of public worship a guard
of fifty full-armed men, and one hundred and fifty more
equipped with swords. However, one of the rules of
the artillery company requiring that " every one of this
company purposely coming to any general or particular
court, or to the ordinances at any public meeting,
whether on the Lord's days, lecture days, days of
solemn fasting or thanksgiving, shall carry and wear his
sword by his side," affords ground for an inference that
the order requiring the whole adult male population to
MILITARY AFFAIRS, 303
wear their swords, had in 1645 been repealed or become
inoperative.
The other plantations conducted their military affairs
in a manner similar to that of New Haven. Indeed,
the colony laws concerning military affairs so closely
resemble those of the principal plantation as to suggest
a common origin. They specify the arms with which
every male within the jurisdiction shall be equipped ;
require that " every captain or chief officer chosen in
any of the plantations, for the military affairs, shall
from time to time be propounded to the next general
court after he is chosen, for approbation and confirma-
tion ;" enjoin inspection of arms "once in each quarter
of a year at least, but oftener if there be cause ; " pro-
vide that ** there shall be every year at least six training
days ;" order that "a fourth part of the trained band in
every plantation shall in their course come constantly to
the worship of God every Lord's day, and (such as can
come) on lecture days ; to be at the meeting-house at
latest before the second drum hath left beating, with
their arms complete, their guns ready charged, their
match for their matchlocks and flints ready fitted to
their firelock guns, with shot and powder for at least
five shots besides the charge in their guns ; " and " that
a strict watch be kept in the night in all the plantations
within this jurisdiction.'* Exemption from military
duty is defined as follows ; viz. : " Upon consideration of
public service and other due respects, it is ordered that
all magistrates within this jurisdiction, and teaching
elders, shall at all times hereafter be freed, not only in
their persons, but each of them shall have one son or
ser\'ant, by virtue of his place or office, freed from all
304 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
watching, warding, and training. And it is further
ordered that all elders, deputies for courts intrusted for
judicature, all the chief military officers (as captains,
lieutenants, and ensigns), the jurisdiction treasurer,
deacons, and all physicians, school-masters, and surgeons,
allowed by authority in any of these plantations, all
masters of ships and other vessels above fifteen tons,
all public millers constantly employed, with others for
the present discharged for personal weakness and
infirmity, shall, in their own persons, in time of peace
and safety, be freed from the said services. And that
all other seamen and ship-carpenters, and such as hold
farms above two miles from any of the plantations,
train only twice a year at such times as shall be ordered
either by the authority or by the military officers of the
plantation. But all persons freed and exempted from
the respective services as before, shall yet in all respects
provide, keep, and maintain in a constant readiness,
complete arms, and all other military provisions as other
men ; magistrates, and teaching elders excepted, who yet
shall be constantly furnished for all such sons and ser-
vants as are hereby freed from the forementioned ser-
• »»
vices.
The artillery company at New Haven seems in later
years to have become so far a colonial company that
" Mr. Chittenden of Guilford " was one of -its sergeants.
A company of troopers was organized in 1656. "It is
ordered that sixteen horses shall be provided and kept
in the five towns upon the main, in this jurisdiction,
with suitable saddles, bridles, pistols, and other furni-
ture that is necessary toward the raising of a small
troop for the service of the country, in an equal pro-
MILITARY AFFAIRS. 305
portion as they can be divided, according to the estate
of each plantation, which is as followeth : Six from
New Haven, four from Milford, two from Stamford, and
four from Guilford and Branford, and that the persons
who shall freely undertake or be appointed thereunto,
shall be free from rates, both for their persons and the
said horses, also from training with the foot company,
and from any press for themselves and horses to other
public service, and shall have what other privileges are
granted to troopers in the Massachusetts or Connecticut
colonies, provided that such men who shall be appointed
to this service shall be diligent in the use of all due
means to fit themselves and horses for the same at
home in their several plantations, after which this
Court will consider how they may be improved in a
public way of training."
At the same court it was "ordered, that, for the
encouragement of soldiers in their military exercise,
every plantation shall provide a partisan for their lieu-
tenant, colors for their ensign, halberds for their ser-
geants, with drums fit for service, with a certain number
of pikes, as hereafter expressed. New Haven being,
furnished, Milford is to have sixteen pikes, Stamford
sixteen, Guilford twelve, Southold and Branford eight
apiece ; and, further, that half a pound of powder for
every soldier be allowed by every town out of their
town rate, once in a year, to the chief officer, to be
by him bestowed upon them, according to their due
deserts, to be spent as he shall order, by shooting at a
mark three times in a year, for some small prize which
each town shall provide, in value not above five shillings
a time, and not less than two shillings sixpence, which
306 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
shall be ordered either to one or more, as the officer
shall appoint ; and that each town provide a good pair
of hilts for soldiers to play at cudgels with ; and that
they exercise themselves in playing at backsword, &c. ;
that they learn how to handle their weapons for the
defence of themselves and offence of their enemies ;
and that the deputies of each plantation speak to the
teaching elders there to take some fit opportunity to
speak to the soldiers something by way of exhortation
to quicken them to a conscientious attendance to this
duty ; and that soldiers in time of their vacancy do
exercise themselves in running, wrestling, leaping, and
the like manly exercises, the better to fit their bodies
for service and hardship ; and that all other exercises,
as stool-ball, ninepins, quoits, and such like games, be
forbidden, and not to be used till the military exercise
of the day be finished, and the company dismissed from
that service."
The colony of New Haven, though always prepared
for war, had no opportunity for great or brilliant
achievements. The Indians in their immediate neigh-
borhood were peaceable and friendly ; and though tribes
more remote sometimes threatened hostilities against
the whole European population of New England, and
though war with the Dutch was at one time imminent,
yet the period of which our history treats, exhibits no
battles like those of the Pequot war immediately pre-
ceding it, or of the wars subsequent to the union with
Connecticut.
There was no disturbance at all during the first five
years. The union of the towns into a colony, and of
MILITARY AFFAIRS. 307
the four colonies into a confederation, was hastened by
portents of a general war with the Indians. The same
year in which the union was consummated, the commis-
sioners of the United Colonics, feeling that they were
under obligation to defend Uncas, the sachem of the
Mohegans, and the ally of the English, from the ven-
geance of the Narragansets, requested Connecticut and
New Haven to undertake this service. Accordingly six.
soldiers were sent from New Haven to Norwich in a
shallop, "to join with eight from Hartford for Uncas's
defence against the assaults which may be made upon
him by the Narraganset Indians." This squad of sol-
diers remained with Uncas till messengers from the
commissioners of the United Colonies hiad for the
moment dissuaded the Narragansets from their hostile
purposes against the Mohegans. Two years later, the
Narragansets, having in violation of their promise
resumed hostilities, assistance was again sent to Uncas
from New Haven and from Connecticut. • These auxil-
iaries remained with him several months. A special
meeting of the commissioners of the United Colonies
being meanwhile called, they determined that an imme-
diate war with the Narragansets was both justifiable
and necessary. New Haven was required to send thirty
of the three hundred soldiers composing the army of
invasion. In three days after the declaration of war, a
company of forty men ready to march was raised in
Massachusetts, as the first fruits of her quota of one
hundred and ninety men. The arrival at Mohegan of
this advanced company, relieved the Connecticut and
New Haven men so long absent from their homes on
garrison duty ; and the spirited preparations made by
308 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
the English induced the Narragansets to sign articles
of peace, which made it unnecessary for New Haven to
send her quota to the war. From time to time the Nar-
ragansets broke and renewed their promises, till, in King
Philip's war, which occurred after the union of New
Haven with Connecticut, they were driven from their
territory, never to repossess it.
Simultaneously with the first of the expeditions to
Mohegan, there was danger in the west as well as in the
east ; the Dutch being involved in an Indian war, and
the Indians being not careful to distinguish between
Dutch and English. The same month in which the
shallop was sent to Norwich, the Dutch governor pro-
posed that one hundred soldiers should be raised out of
the English plantations, and led by Capt. Underbill ' of
Stamford, to assist the Dutch against the Indians, prom-
ising to pay the whole expense " by bills of exchange
* Capt. John Underbill, formerly of Boston. After, if not in conse-
quence of, the preaching of antinomianism at Boston, he fell into the vilest
immorality, and found it expedient to change his residence. Removing
first to Piscataqua, he came afterward to Stamford. There he was well
received on account of his professional ability, the town agreeing to pay
him a salary as their captain; and the jurisdiction, upon his application for
a loan of £20 to supply his present occasions, ordering that if the lending
of this ;£'20 may be a means to settle the captain, and if they conceive his
settlement may tend to their comfort and security, and if the town of
Stamford will see the said sum duly repaid, the jurisdiction is willing to
lend the said sum to prevent the snares of larger offers for his remove."
Ver\* soon, however, after this endeavor to retain him in the colonv of
New Haven, Underhill was secured by the Dutch, and intrusted with the
chief command in the war they were waging with the Indians. After some
good service rendered on Long Island, he led a force of one hundred and
thirt}' men to Greenwich, surprised an Indian village in the night, and, by a
terrific slaughter, almost equalling in the number of the slain that in
which he had been a principal actor at Mystic fort, persuaded the natives
to terminate a conflict in which they were so inferior to their foes.
MILITARY AFFAIRS, 309
into Holland." Stamford, being nearest to the scene of
danger, was disposed to join with the Dutch in chastising
the merciless savages. But the General Court, "not
clearly understanding the rise and cause of the war, and
remembering that they could not make war without the
consent of the other confederate colonies, did not see
how they might afford the aid propounded without a
meeting and consent of the commissioners for the rest
of the jurisdictions. But if peace be not settled this
winter, so soon as the commissioners may meet in the
spring, both the ground of the war and the aid or
assistance desired may be taken into due consideration ;
and if in the mean time there be want of corn for men
and food for cattle, in supply of what the Indians have
destroyed, these plantations will afford what help they
may."
We hear nothing more of the proposal that the Eng-
lish should join with the Dutch to chastise the Indians.
On the contrary, we find the Dutch, a few years after-
ward, when their own troubles had come to an end,
charged with selling fire-arms to the Indians, and
inciting them to hostilities against Connecticut and
New Haven, between which colonies and the Dutch
there were some matters in dispute. This quarrel was
still further inflamed when news came of war between
Holland and England, so that in the spring of 1653
the commissioners of the United Colonies, by a vote
of seven to one, declared war against the colony of
New Netherlands, having, as the majority believed,
sufficient evidence that the Dutch governor had plotted
with the Indians for the destruction of the English.
In the autumn, by a similar vote of seven to one, they
310 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
declared war against Ninigret, sachem of the Niantics.
But the General Court of Massachusetts, nullifying the
action of the commissioners, on the ground that the
evidence of a plot was insufficient, refused to contribute
her quota of troops. The General Court of New Haven
jurisdiction, declaring that the Massachusetts General
Court and Council " have broken their covenant with us
in acting directly contrary to the articles of confedera-
tion," saw themselves "called to seek for help else-
where," and could " conclude of no better way than to
make their addresses to the State of England." Con-
necticut joined with them, and the appeal was success-
ful. Cromwell, listening to their declaration, that,
"unless the Dutch be either removed or subjected, so
far at least that these colonies may be freed from inju-
rious affronts, and secured against the dangers and mis-
chievous effects which daily grow upon them by their
plotting with the Indians, and furnishing them with
arms against the English, and that the league and con-
federation betwixt the four united English colonies be
confirmed and settled according to the true sense
(and, till this year, the continued interpretation) of the
articles, the peace and comfort of these smaller western
colonies will be much hazarded," sent a fleet to sub-
jugate New Netherlands.
The plan, as formed after the arrival of the fleet at
Boston, was, to raise an army to co-operate with the
ships, to consist of two hundred from Massachusetts,
two hundred from the ships, two hundred from Con-
necticut, "and one hundred and thirty-three from this
colony, which the Court must now agree to raise in
equal proportion, which was done as follows ; viz. •
MILITAR Y AFFAIRS, 3 1 1
From New Haven, fifty ; from Milford, twenty-one ;
from Guilford, seventeen ; from Stamford, twenty ;
from Southold, fourteen ; from Branford, eleven ; New
Haven and Milford having one or two less in propor-
tion than the rest, because of seamen that are to go
from thence, which, if not provided for, will put them
above their proportion. Of which one hundred and
thirty-three, these officers were chosen : Lieut. Seeley,
captain ; Lieut. Nash, lieutenant ; Richard Baldwin, of
Milford, ensign; Sergt. Munson,. Sergt. Whitehead,
Sergt. Tibballs, of Milford, and Sergt. Bartlett, of Guil-
ford, sergeants ; Robert Basset, chief drummer, and
Anthony Elcott to be under him ; Mr. Augur, and
John Brockett, surgeons ; and Mr. Pierson is chosen
and appointed to go along with this company as their
minister, for their encouragement, spiritual instruction,
and comfort ; and the corporals are, Corp. Boykin, John
Cooper, Henry Botsford of Milford, and Thomas Stevens
of Guilford ; but this last is only for this present ser-
vice, and that he proceed no higher in any other office,
because he is not a freeman, and that the chief military
officer be acquainted with it.*'
The caveat of the Court, in respect to Corp. Stevens,
illustrates the care taken by the New Haven Colony to
commit military authority to none but church-members.
For some reason, — perhaps for the reason that no
church-member could be found who would willingly go,
— an exception to the rule was allowed in this instance ;
but Corp. Stevens was made to understand that he could
rise to no higher office, and that his rank would cease
when the expedition returned.
312 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
" The Court, considering the great weight of this business, and
that all good success depends upon God's blessing, did therefore
order that the fourth day of the next week shall be set apart by
all the plantations of this jurisdiction, to seek God in an extra-
ordinary way, in fristing and prayer, for a blessing upon the enter-
prise abroad, and for the safety of the plantations at home.
"The Court considered of what provisions were necessary to
send forth with these men for a month, and agreed upon six
tuns of beer, six thousand biscuits, nine barrels of pork, six barrels
of beef, four hogsheads of pease, three hogsheads of flour, six
firkins of butter, five hundred (pounds) of cheese, three anchors of
liquor, trays, dishes or cans, pails, kettles ; and that ever)' man
have a good firelock musket, with other arms suitable ; a knapsack,
with one pound of powder, and twenty-four musket bullets, or four
pounds of ]iistol shot : and, for a stock beside, in the whole, two
barrels of powder, three hundred weight of musket bullets, and one
hundred weight of pistol shot, with twenty spades and shovels,
ten axes, and ten mattocks.*'
" It is ordered that the charges of soldiers, horse or foot, wher-
ever provided for, shall be at the jurisdiction's charge in equal
proportion."
"It is ordered that the magistrates and deputies at New Haven
shall be a committee to order matters which concern this design,
but cannot now be foreseen, as occasions present, and what they
do is to stand good as if the Court did it."
** It is ordered that Johnson's lighter shall be pressed to attend
the service, for transporting of men and provisions as there is
occasion."
"It is ordered that all vessels which come into any harbor in
this jurisdiction, which may be fit to attend this service, shall be
made stay of for the same, on behalf of the commonwealth of Eng-
land, till further order."
"It is ordered that as soon as the army is past, watching and
warding shall begin in an extraordinary way, as may suit with
ever)- town's conveniency and safety, and then all Indians are to
be restrained from coming into any of our plantations without
leave."
MILITARY AFFAIRS. 313
These preparations for war were ordered on the 23d
of June, the governor having on that day "acquainted
the Court with some letters he had received from
Mr. Leete from Boston, informing that the design
against the Dutch is like to go on." But the design
did not go on, for in a few days came news of peace
concluded between England and Holland. At the next
session held July 5, "the governor informed the Court
that there were with him this day since dinner two men,
sent as messengers from the Dutch governor, to inquire
of the truth of the peace which they hear by report is
concluded betwixt England and Holland, who desired
that two or three lines might be sent to certify the
same ; which the Court desired the governor to do, and
ordered that a copy of the proclamation should be sent
also ; both which were presently done, and the messen-
gers dismissed.*'
New Haven being thus restrained from executing
her design against the Dutch, turned her attention to
Ninigret, who, emboldened by the nullifying attitude
of Massachusetts, was preparing to destroy the IndiaiV*
tribes friendly to the English. In August she de-
spatched Lieut. Seeley, Connecticut sending also Capt.
Mason, to carry a present of powder and lead to the
Montauk Indians, on Long Island, and explain that
with it they were "not to offend or hurt Ninigret or
any other Indians, but to defend themselves if they
are invaded." At the meeting of the commissioners
in September, Massachusetts consented, though, as the
result showed, not very heartily, to active hostilities
against Ninigret. It was determined to raise an army
of forty horsemen and two hundred and sixty footmen,
314 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
the quota of New Haven being thirty-one. Sixteen
of these were immediately sent, with two seamen to
carry them and their provisions by water, eight from
New Haven, three from Milford, three from Stamford,
two from Guilford, and two from Branford.
The Court also " agreed of provisions to be sent for
a month as followeth : Six barrels of beer, five hundred
pounds of bread, one barrel of beef, one barrel of pork,
one hundred pounds of cheese, one barrel of pease, and
three gallons of strong water ; with every man two
pounds of powder and shot answerable, for a stock ;
besides one pound of powder and shot answerable, which
every man is to carry with him ; with some coats, every
man his knapsack and musket, and other fit arms for
the ser\'ice ; six trays, six dishes, and one kettle ; and
for the chief officer for this colony in this sendee, the
Court chose Lieut. Seeley, and Sergt. Jeffrey for ser-
geant ; and the other fifteen men are to be forthwith
pressed, that they may be in readiness to attend further
service if they be called to it."
The 1 3th of October being the time agreed upon for
the meeting of the troops from the different colonies
at the place of rendezvous, it was " ordered that upon
the twelfth day of this month, being the fifth day of
the week, shall be a day of humiliation to seek God for
a blessing upon this enterprise in hand."
Contrary to the wishes of New Haven and of Con-
necticut, no fighting was done by the troops thus sent
against the sachem of the Niantics. Willard, the com-
mander-in-chief, receiving his appointment from Massa-
chusetts, seems to have been as reluctant to engage in
hostilities as the power which appointed him. The
MIL I TAR Y AFFAIRS. 3 1 $
commissioners, at their next meeting nearly a year
afterward, censured him for his inactivity, and referred
the matter to the General Courts of the several colo-
nies. New Haven, in response, expressed the opinion
that he had not obeyed his instructions, but declined
to propose any penalty till the other colonics had acted.
They were powerless to punish a citizen of Massachu-
setts whose conduct Massachusetts approved, even if
she had not, as Trumbull charges, predetermined it.
The failure of the expedition against the Niantics
made it necessary to employ an armed vessel to cruise
in the Sound, " to hinder Ninigret from going against
the Long Island Indians." The vessel was commanded
by John Youngs, son of the pastor at Southold (a plan-
tation belonging to New Haven), and four men were
sent with him by vote of the jurisdiction. This service
continued about a year, and seems to have effectually
prevented the hostile incursions of Ninigret into Long
Island.
With this exception, there seems to have been no
military service required by the New Haven colony
from the time of the Niantic expedition to the union
with Connecticut, other than the regular trainings in
each plantation ; though for several years immediately
subsequent to that expedition, wars between Indian
tribes excited frequent alarms among the Engjish, and
stimulated them to unusual diligence in military exer-
cise.
CHAPTER XV.
THE ABORIGINES.
THE small tribes of Indians which originally pos-
sessed the territory of the New Haven colony had
lived in fear of the Pequots and the Mohawks. De-
livered from fear of their eastern enemies by the extinc-
tion of the Pequot tribe, they gladly received the Eng-
lish planters, hoping that the people, by whose wonder-
ful prowess this deliverance had been effected, would
protfcct them from their enemies in the west.
"The Mohawks," says Trumbull, "had not only
carried their conquests as far southward as Virginia, but
eastward as far as Connecticut River. The Indians,
therefore, in the western parts of Connecticut, were
their tributaries. Two old Mohawks, ever)' year or two,
might be seen issuing their orders and collecting their
tribute, with as much authority and haughtiness as a
Roman dictator.
"It is indeed difficult to describe the fear of this
terrible nation, which had fallen on all the Indians in
the western parts of Connecticut. If they neglected
to pay their tribute, the Mohawks would come down
against them, plunder, destroy, and carry them captive
at pleasure. When they made their appearance in the
country, the Connecticut Indians would instantly raise
316
THE ABORIGINES. 317
a cry from hill to hill, ' A Mohawk ! a Mohawk ! ' and
fly like sheep before wolves, without attempting the
least resistance. The Mohawks would cry out in the
most terrible manner in their language, importing, * We
are come, we arc come, to suck your blood ! ' When the
Connecticut Indians could not escape to their forts, they
would immediately flee to the English houses for shel-
ter; and sometimes the Mohawks would pursue them
so closely as to enter with them, and kill them in the
presence of the family. If there was time to shut the
doors, they never entered by force ; nor did they upon
any occasion do the least injury to the English.**
In the articles of agreement in which Momaugin,
sachem of Quinnipiac, and his council, conveyed land to
Theophilus Eaton, John Davenport, and others, Eng-
lish planters at Quinnipiac, they refer to ** heavy taxes
and eminent dangers which they lately felt and feared
from the Pequots, Mohawks, and other Indians, in
regard of which they durst not stay in their country,
but were forced to fly and to seek shelter under the
English at Connecticut ; " mention "the safety and ease
that other Indians enjoy near the English, of which
benefit they have had a comfortable taste already since
the English began to build and plant at Quinnipiac ; "
and stipulate " that if at any time hereafter they be
affrighted in their dwellings assigned by the English
unto them as before, they may repair to the English
plantation for shelter, and that the English will there
in a just cause endeavor to defend them from wrong."
The Quinnipiacs at New Haven numbered "forty-
seven men or youth fit for service," and covenanted
"not to receive or admit any other Indians amongst
3l8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
them without leave first had and obtained from the
English." Montowese, whose land adjoined that of
Momaugin on the north, reported his company as be-
ing " but ten men besides women and children."
The Indians of Guilford were of the same tribe as the
Quinnipiacs of New Haven, for Shaumpishuh, the
squaw sachem at Guilford, was sister of Momaugin,
and signed with him the deed of sale to Eaton and
Davenport. After she sold her land at Guilford to
Whitfield and his partners in the purchase, she came
to reside with her brother at East Haven," bringing
with her thirty-four of her people ; of the rest a few
removed to Branford, and about thirty-three persons
remained at Guilford. Of the latter company, one was
blind, and another was "a dumb old man."
These statistics favor the opinion that the territory
of the New Haven colony, when the English began to
build and plant upon it, was but sparsely inhabited.
Momaugin had about one square mile for every one of
his people, and Montowese had thirteen square miles
for each of his ten men. The Wepowaugs were appar-
ently more numerous than the Indians at New Haven.
Perhaps it was because this tribe was so powerful, that
the English settlement at Milford was fortified with
palisades. Trumbull speaks in terms indefinite indeed,
but fitted to convey the impression that Ansantaway,
their sachem, had some hundreds of warriors ; specify-
ing five different settlements in the town of Milford,
and making mention of oyster-shells " so deep that they
never have been ploughed or dug through to this day."
De Forest thinks that Trumbull's estimate was too
* De Forest, History of the Indians of Connecticut, p. 167.
THE ABORIGINES. 319
high. He says, " The territories of this clan stretched
fifteen or eighteen miles along the coast, and compre-
hended nearly the present townships of Monroe, Hunt-
ington, Trumbull, Bridgeport, Stratford, Milford, Orange,
and Derby. In numbers it seems to have been consid-
erable ; and large heaps of shells have been found along
the coast, showing what must have been the natives'
favorite and principal food. These heaps, however, do
not necessarily prove the large population which people
often suppose ; for they were probably the accumula-
tions of centuries, and their foundations may have been
laid by some race which came and disappeared before
the foot of a Paugussett or Wepowaug ever left its
print on these shores. In fact, eating oysters is not
such a marvellous feat that large piles of oyster-shells
must of necessity indicate a great number of con-
sumers. We must consider also that as the natives
depended little upon agriculture for a subsistence, and
as hunting was a less certain and more laborious mode
of supply than fishing, a very large proportion of their
food consisted of the produce of the sea, and especially
of shell-fish." Slender as is our knowledge of the
Wepowaugs, we know even less of the tribes on the
coast west of them. Fairfield and Norwalk were pur-
chased for Connecticut, and Stamford for New Haven.
The records of Stamford inform us that Capt. Nathan-
ael Turner, the agent of New Haven, purchased of
Ponus, sagamore of Toquams, and his brother Wascus-
sue, sagamore of Shippan, the territory now occupied
by Stamford, Ponus reserving a piece of ground for
himself and the other Indians to plant upon. The
tribe to which Ponus and his family belonged were
320 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
called Siwanoys. Greenwich was also acquired for
New Haven, though for a time the inhabitants repudi-
ated her authority, and placed themselves under the
protection of the Dutch. It is said that the sachems
of whom Patrick and Peaks purchased Greenwich, were
sons of Ponus. The red men resident in the vicinity
have been estimated at from three hundred to five hun-
dred, but even the latter number was largely increased
during the war which the Dutch waged with the
Indians, many of whom fled to Greenwich from their
customary abodes nearer to New Amsterdam. This
temporary accession to the aborigines inhabiting the
territory claimed by New Haven was more than bal-
anced by the terrible slaughter executed by Underbill
in the sen'ice of the Dutch, who, surprising a village in
Greenwich, put to death in a single night, by lead,
steel, and fire, according to the estimate of the natives,
five hundred of its inhabitants.
With the exception of Southold, which was purchased
of the Montauks, a tribe always friendly to the English,
the territory of New Haven colony was acquired from
the Indians mentioned or alluded to in the preceding
paragraph. It will be seen that the colony had less
reason to apprehend collision with the aborigines on
its own territories than if these had been united in a
single tribe, under one chieftain. A sagamore who had
only a score or two of warriors, even if smarting under
the infliction of wrong, would not be so quick to resort
to hostilities as one who counted his tribe by hundreds.
It was, however, the policy of the New Haven people,
to avoid conflict with the red men as much as possible,
and to cultivate their friendship. They were, indeed,
THE ABORIGINES, 321
, earnest for war with Ninigret in 1653 and 1654, seeing
li no (Jther way to secure peace than by fighting for it ; but
- i their history, as a whole, evinces a ruling desire to live
in amity with their Indian neighbors. They were care-
ful to deal justly with them in all public dealings, and
to avenge any injuries inflicted upon them by the greed
or passion of individuals. This is true of the fathers
of New England in general; but Hubbard, a Massa-
chusetts historian, testifies of New Haven, in par-
ticular, "They have been mercifully preserved from
harm and violence all along from the Indians, setting
aside a particular assault or two, the means whereof
hath been a due carefulness in doing justice to them
upon all occasions against the English, yet far avoid-
ing any thing looking like servility or flattery for base
ends." It was a memorable testimony which, as Win-
throp relates, a Pequot gave in favor of the foe who
had extinguished the tribal existence of his people.
" Those at New Haven, intending a plantation at Dela-
ware,'sent some men to purchase a large tract of land
of the Indians there, but they refused to deal with
them. It so fell out that a Pequot sachem (being fled
his country in our war with them, and having seated
himself, with his company, upon that river ever since)
was accidentally there at that time. He, taking notice
of the English and their desire, persuaded the other
sachem to deal with them ; and told him that howso-
ever they had killed his countrymen, and driven them
out, yet they were honest men, and had just cause to
do as they did, for the Pequots had done them wrong,
and refused to give such reasonable satisfaction as was
demanded of them. Whereupon the sachem enter-
322 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
tained them, and let them have what land they
desired."
As respects New Haven in particular, her records
show a disposition to do justice to the Indian. Take
the following cases for evidence : —
"June 25, 1650. A seaman that went in Michael Taynter's
vessel was brought before the governor, and accused by Wash, an
Indian, that he, having hired him to show him tlie way to Totoket
and agreed for twelvepence, when he was upon the way Wash
asked him for his money ; the man gave him tenpence, lack two
wampum. Wash said he must have twelvepence, else he would
not go ; whereupon the seaman took him by the arm, pulled him,
and threw him down, and stamped upon him, and, in stri\'ing
broke his arm. The seaman said he agreed with him for tenpence,
and gave him so much ; but Wash would not go, and struck him
first, and he cannot tell that he broke his arm, for it was sore
before. Whereupon Mr. Besthup and Mr. Augur, two surgeons
being desired to give their advice, said, to their best apprehension
the arm was broken now, though by reason of an old sore, whereby
the bone might be infected, might cause it the more easily to break.
The Court was called, but none came to the governor but Mr.
Crane, Mr. Gibbard, and Francis Newman. They would have per-
suaded Wash to have taken some wampum for satisfaction, but he
would not hear of it, but said he desired it might be healed at the
man's charge. Whereupon the Court desired Mr. Besthup to do
the best he could to heal it, and promised him satisfaction, and,
for the present, sent the man to prison. But, quickly after, Philip
Leeke, John Jones, and Edward Camp, became his bail, and bound
themselves in a bond of j^io, that, upon a month's warning left
with Philip Leeke, the man should make his appearance here before
authority. And David Sellevant and Robert Lord became sureties,
and engaged to bear them harmless."
" March, 1664. Nathanael Thorpe being called before the Court
for stealing venison from an Indian called Ourance, Ourance was
called, and asked what he had to say against Nathaniel Thorpe.
Nasup, on his behalf, declared that Ourance had killed a deer,
THE ABORIGINES, 323
and hanged some of it upon a tree, and brought some of it away,
and coming by (on the sabbath day, in Ihe afternoon) Nathanael
Thorpe's house, his dog barked, and Nathanael Thorpe came out
and asked Ourance what he carry, and Ourance said venison, and
further said that he had more a little walk in the woods. Then
Nathanael Thorpe said to him that the wolf would eat it. Ourance
said, No, he had hanged it upon a tree. Then he said that
Nathanael Thorpe said to him. Where, where ? and he told him
a little walk, and to-morrow he would truck it. Then to-morrow
Ourance went for the venison, and two quarters of it was gone,
and he see this man's track in the snow, and see blood. Then he
came to Nathanael Thorpe, and tell him that he steal his venison ;
but Nathanael Thorpe speak, Ourance lie, and that he would tan-
tack him. And Ourance further said that he whispered to
Nathanael Thorpe, and told him if he would give him his veni-
son he would not discover him ; but still he peremptorily denied
it, and told many lies concerning it, and, after it was found in an
outhouse of his, he said he had trucked the week before."
Thorpe, having confessed his guilt : —
'* He was told seriously of his sin, and of his falseness, and
that after he seemed to hold forth sorrow before the magistrates ;
yet then he spake falsely, and said that it was a little before morn-
ing he rose out of his bed and did it, and that now he saith it was
in the evening, before he went to bed ; and he was told the several
aggravations of his sin, as that it seemed to be contrived on the
Lord's day, staying at home by reason of some bodily weakness,
and that he had done it to an Indian, and to a poor Indian, and
when himself had no need of it, and so often denying it, &c.,
whereby he makes the English and their religion odious to the
heathen, and thereby hardens them. So the Court proceeded to
sentence, and for his theft declared, according to the law in the
case, that he pay double to the Indian; viz., the venison, with two
bushels of Indian corn ; and for his notorious lying, and the several
aggravations of his sin, that he pay as a fine to the plantation twenty
shillings, and sit in the stocks the Court's pleasure. And he was
told, that, were it not that they considered him as sometimes dis-
324 HISTORY OF XEIV HAVEN COLONY,
tempered in his head, they should have been more sharp with him.
Then Nathanael Thorpe declared that he desired to judge himself
for his sin, and that the Lord would bless their good counsel to
him, that so he might take warning for the future, lest it be worse
with him."
Not contenting themselves with mere justice, the
New Haven colony were also kind and helpful to their
Indian neighbors. Take, for evidence and illustration,
the following action of the town of New Haven con-
cerning a field which the Indians desired to have
fenced : —
" The governor acquainted the town that the Indians complain
that the swine that belong to the town, or farms, do them much
wrong in eating their corn ; and now they intend to take in a new
piece of ground, and they desired the English would help them to
fence it, and that those who have meadows at the end of their
ground would fence it, and save them fencing about. Sergeant
Jeffrey and John Brockett were desired to go speak with them, to
know what ground it is which they intend to take in, and to view
it, and see what fencing it may be, and give them the best direction
they can. The sagamore also desires the town to give him a coat.
He saith he is old and poor, and cannot work. The town declared
themselves free that he should have a coat given him at the town's
charge."
At the next meeting it was
" Ordered, concerning the Indians' land spoken of the last
court, that Thomas Jeffrey, John Brockett, William Tuttle, and
Robert Talmadge shall be a committee to view the ground which
they say is theirs, and to adxnse them for the best about fencing:
the meadow lying against their ground bearing its due proportion :
and that some men be appointed at the town's charge to show
them how, and help them in their fencing; that so we may not
have such complaints from them of cattle and hogs spoiling their
com, which they say makes their squaws and children cr)-."
THE ABORIGINES, 32$
At a later date it was
" Ordered that the townsmen shall treat with the Indians, getting
Mr. Pierson and his Indian for interpreters, and make a fiSll agree-
ment in writing what we shall do, and what they shall be bound
to ; and let tliem know that what their agreement is, we expect
they shall perform it."
In this agreement tlircescore days' work was promised
to the Indians toward their fence, and the town voted
that the work " should be done by men fit and able for
the work, and be paid for out of the town treasury."
Just and kind treatment of the aborigines was re-
quired of the English by politic prudence as well as by
Christian benevolence. The action concerning the
sagamore*s coat and the fence around his land was
taken in 1653, when, throughout all the colonies, there
was some fear of a general combination of Indians
against the English. New Haven does not seem to
have felt any present distrust of the tribes within her
borders, but the intermingling of neighborly kindness
with orders for special military preparations and pre-
cautions suggests that the manifestations of kindness
may have proceeded, not from pure benevolence, but
from a complex motive in which prudence was a con-
siderable element.
An illustrative instance of this politic prudence oc-
curred in the second year of the plantation at Quin-
nipiac, and before civil government had been formally
instituted. The planters at Wethersficld, having some
quarrel with Sowheag, the sachem of the place, had
driven him from his reservation near their village, and
he had removed to Middletown. Sowheag, in prose-
326 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
cution of the quarrel, had incited, or at least encour-
aged, the Pequots to make an attack on Wethersfield,
in which six men and three women were killed, and
had ever since entertained and protected the Pequot
warriors by whom these murders were committed. The
Pequot war being now ended, so that the Connecticut
people were at liberty to attend to Sowheag, they re-
quired him to give up these murderers ; and, upon his
refusal, the General Court, in August, 1639, ordered a
levy of one hundred men to be sent to Mattabeseck, as
Middletown was then called, to take them by force.
But the Court also determined to obtain the advice and
consent of their friends at Quinnipiac before carrying
their design into execution.
"Gov. Eaton and his council,'* says Trumbull, "fully
approved of the design of bringing the delinquents to
condign punishment, but they disapproved of the man-
ner proposed by Connecticut. They feared that it would
be introductive to a new Indian war. This, they repre-
sented, would greatly endanger the new settlements,
and be many ways injurious and distressing. They
wanted peace, all their men and money, to prosecute the
design of planting the country. They represented that
a new war would not only injure the plantations in these
respects, but would prevent the coming over of new
planters whom they expected from England. They
were therefore determinately against seeking redress
by an armed force. Connecticut, through their influ-'
ence, receded from the resolution which they had
formed with respect to Sowheag and Mattabeseck.**
Eaton, though not at that time, as Trumbull care-
lessly assumes, governor of New Haven jurisdiction.
THE ABORIGINES, 327
may have had some provisional power or trust, such
as was abrogated by the first action of the Court when
civil government was settled two months afterward.
Certainly his voice gave expression to the public opinion
of his plantation. His determined opposition to the
proposed war upon Sowheag is easily accounted for by
the nearness of Middletown to New Haven, and by the
still closer contiguity of Montowese, a son of Sowheag,
whose wigwam was but one hour distant from the
English houses at Quinnipiac.
That this pacific policy of New Haven was not
carried to a hazardous extreme, is evident from the
punishment inflicted on one of these Pequot mur-
derers, who, of his own accord, came to Quinnipiac,
presuming, perhaps, on the manifested leniency of that
plantation. The trial of Nepaupuck, which commenced
the day after civil government was instituted at Quin-
nipiac, has already been mentioned. A more particular
account of it is here appropriate, and may perhaps be
best given verbatim from the record.
"October 26th 1639. The civil affairs of the plantation being
settled as before, by the providence of God an Indian called Mes-
sutunck, alias Nepaupuck, who had been formerly accused to
have murderously shed the blood of some of the English, of his
own accord, with a deer's head upon his back, came to Mr. Eaton's,
where by warrant the marshal apprehended and pinioned him ; yet
notwithstanding, by the subtlety and treachery of another Indian
his companion, he had almost made ah escape ; but by the same
providence he was again taken and delivered into the magistrates
power and by his order safely kept in the stocks till he might be
brought to a due trial. And the Indian who had attempted his
escape was whipped by the marshal's deputy.
"October 28th 1639. The Quinnipiac Indian Sagamore with
328 . HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
divers of his Indians with him were examined before the magistrate
and the deputies for this plantation concerning Nepaupuck. They
generally accused him to have murdered one or more of the Eng-
lish, and that he had cut off some of their hands and had presented
them to Sassacus the Pequot sachem, boasting that he had killed
them with his own hands.
" Mewhebato a Quinnipiac Indian, kinsman to the aforesaid Ne-
paupuck, coming at the same time to intercede for him, was exam-
ined what he knew concerning the murders charged upon the said
Nepaupuck. At first he pretended ignorance, but with a distracted
countenance, and in a trembling manner. Being admonished to
speak the truth he did acknowledge him guilty according to the
charge the other Indians had before made.
"All the other Indians withdrawing, Nepaupuck was brought
in and examined. He confessed that Nepaupuck was guilty ac-
cording to the tenure of the former charge, but denied that he was
Nepaupuck. Mewhebato being brought in, after some signs of
sorrow, charged him to his face that he had assisted the Pequots
in murdering the English. This somewhat abated his spirit and
boldness ; but Wattoone, the son of Carroughood a councillor to
the Quinnipiac Indian sagamore, coming in charged him more
particularly that he had killed Abraham Finch, an Englishman, at
Wethersfield, and that he himself, the said Wattoone, stood upon
the island at Wethersfield and beheld him, the said Nepaupuck,
now present, acting the said murder.
"Lastly, the Quinnipiac sagamore and the rest of the Indians
being called in. to his face afiirmcd that he was Nepaupuck, and
that he had murdered one or more of the English as before.
" Nepaupuck being by the concurrence of testimony convinced,
confessed he was the man, namely Nepaupuck, and boasted he was
a great captain, had murdered Abraham Finch, and had his hands
in other English blood. He said he knew he must die, and was
not afraid of it ; but laid his neck to the mantel-tree of the chim-
ney, desiring that his head might be cut off, or that he might die
in any other manner the English should appoint; only, he said,
fire was God and God was angry with him; therefore he would
not fall into his hands. After this he was returned to the stocks,
and, as before, a watch appointed for his safe custody.
THE ABORIGINES. 329
"A general court 29th of October, 1639. ^ general court
being assembled to proceed against the said Indian Nepaupuck,
who was then brought to the bar and being examined as before,
at the first he denied that he was that Nepaupuck which had com-
mitted those murders wherewith he was charged; but when he
saw that the Quinnipiac Sagamore and his Indians did again
accuse him to his face, he confessed that he had his hand in the
murder of Abraham Finch, but yet he said there was a Mohawk
of that name that had killed more than he.
"Wattoone affirmed to his face that he, the said Nepaupuck,
did not only kill Abraham Finch, but was one of them that killed
the tliree men in the boat or shallop on Connecticut River, and
that there was but one Nepaupuck and this was he and the same
that took a child of Mr. Swain at Wethersfield. Then the said
Nepaupuck being asked if he would not confess that he deserved
to die, he answered, * It is weregin^ *
" The Court having had such pregnant proof, proceeded to pass
sentence upon him according to the nature of the fact and the rule
in that case, * He that sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood
be shed.' Accordingly his head was cut off the next day and
pitched upon a pole in the market place."
If Nepaupuck had been a lawyer, he might have de-
murred not only to the indictment for murder of one
who had killed in war the enemies of his tribe, but
also to the jurisdiction of a power which had been
in existence but a single day, and did not even then
claim as its own, the territory where a crime was alleged
to have been committed two years befor£. But his un-
tutored mind approved of that principle of natural jus-
tice, according to which, in every instance in which
English blood was shed by an Indian, the English re-
quired life for life without regard to territorial limita-
tion. His own people acted upon the same principle,
and he justified it when it recoiled upon himself.
* Well, or good. Some dialects used n in place of r. Eliot's Bible
has vmnnegin in Gen. i. 10, ' God saw that it was wunncgin^
330 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
In making common cause throughout all the colonies
against Indian murderers, certainly the English did no
injustice. They had a right thus to combine for the
protection of life. In deciding whether they were jus-
tifiable in treating as murderers those who had shed
English blood in war, it should be taken into consider-
ation, that, as Capt. Underbill expresses it, "the In-
dians' fight far differs from the Christian practice."
Civilized nations have agreed that soldiers shall not be
held individually responsible for homicide in battle \
but this agreement would not cover such homicides as
those of which Nepaupuck was convicted, and of which
Indian warriors were customarily guilty whenever they
could surprise an unarmed foe. Fighting with a people
wholly uncivilized, the English planters in New Eng-
land were obliged to deviate from the usages established
among civilized nations, and adapt their practice to
the exigencies of their situation.
Another execution of an Indian occurred in 1644,
near the close of the war between the Indians and the
Dutch. A savage named Busheage, not discriminating
between the two European nations whose settlements
were so little space apart, came into a house at Stam- f ^.t-f
ford, none being at home but a woman and her infant,
and, with a lathing-hammer, which he picked up and
examined as if with intent to purchase, struck the
woman as she stooped down to take her child out of
the cradle. The wound was not fatal, but the woman
became hopelessly insane. Busheage, being deliv^ered
to the English, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to
death. Winthrop says, " The executioner would strike
off his head with a falchion, but he had eight blows at
THE ABORIGINES. 33 1
it before he could effect it, and the Indian sat upright
and stirred not all the time."
Four years later Stamford was the scene of another
tragedy. Taphanse, a son of Ponus, the sachem of
the place, brought news into the town that an Indian
named Toquatoes, living up near the Mohawks, had
said at thfir wigwams that he would kill an English-
man ; that they had offered him wampum not to do it ;
that he had come again and reported that he had done
it, and that he had gone away in haste, and left some
of the Englishman's clothing. From that time, Mr.
John Whitmore, one of the principal inhabitants, was
missing. Two months afterward, Uncas, sachem of the
Mohegans, coming to Stamford to assist his English
friends to investigate the matter, was at once conducted
by Taphanse to the place where lay the remains of the
murdered man. Uncas and his Mohegan companions
were satisfied that Taphanse was himself guilty of the
murder, but he escaped before they could apprehend
him.* Fifteen years afterward, being arrested and ex-
amined, he was pronounced "guilty of suspicion," but
"not guilty in point of death."
As the people of New Haven had to do not only with
the aborigines within their borders, but with some who
were without, we have occasion to describe some of
their Indian neighbors who dwelt beyond the limits of
the jurisdiction. Prominent among these was Uncas,
sachem of the Mohegans. De Forest, in "The In-
dians of Connecticut," thus describes him : " In person,
Uncas is said to have been a man of large frame and
great physical strength. His courage could never be
doubted, for he displayed it too often and too clearly in
332 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
war. No sachem, however, was ever more fond of over-
coming his enemies by stratagem and trickery. He
seemed to set little value upon the glory of vanquishing
in war, compared with the advantages it brought him
in the shape of booty, and new subjects, and wider
hunting-grounds. He favored his own men, and was,
therefore, popular with them ; but all others who fell
under his power he tormented with continual exactions
and annoyances. His nature was selfish, jealous, and
tyrannical ; his ambition was grasping, and unrelieved
by a single trait of magnanimity."
Originally a Pequot, and by blood a kinsman of Sas-
sacus, chief sachem of the Pequots at the time when
the Pequot tribe was extinguished by the English,
Uncas had allied himself still more closely with the
royal family of his tribe by marrying a daughter of
Sassacus. But, previous to the Pequot war, he had
broken friendship with Sassacus, and become an exile
from his tribe. The outbreak of hostilities between
the English and the Pequots was to him, therefore, a
welcome opportunity for revenge. With a score or two
of followers he joined the expedition of Capt. Mason
against his native tribe in 1637, which, without the guid-
ance of Uncas and Wequash, would probably have been
fruitless. Uncas had profited by the success of that
expedition as much, perhaps, as the English. The num-
ber of his followers was increased by such captured Pe-
quots as were allowed to join his people, and by other
Indians who appreciated the advantage he might derive
from being the ally of the wonderful white men.
Uncas married, and probably before the Pequot war,
a daughter of Sebequanash, sachem of the Hammonas-
THE ABORIGINES, 333
sets, and by this marriage acquired a large tract of
land on the shore of Long Island Sound, extending
westward from Connecticut River till it touched the
land of the Guilford branch of the Quinnipiacs. This
he sold to Mr, Fenwick and the planters of Guilford,
and withdrew to the east side of the Connecticut River,
to a region, which, as it had formerly belonged to his
ancestors, the Pequot sachems, was now assigned to
him as his portion of the spoils of war. When at the
height of his power, and during that portion of his
career when history mentions him most frequently, his
realidence was commonly at Norwich. But in 1644 he
seems to have been residing, at least temporarily, on his
Hammonasset land ; for in December of that year, in
town meeting at New Haven, " upon complaint made
by some of the planters of Totoket that the Mohegan
Indians have done much damage to them by setting
their traps in the walk of their cattle, it was ordered
that the marshal shall go with Thomas Whitway to
warn Uncas, or his brother, or else I^oxon, to come and
speak with the governor and the magistrates." At this
time Uncas, having sold a strip of land on the shore,
still claimed for his son by his Hammonasset wife the
northern part of the land which she had inherited. He
and his son united in a deed conveying it to the planters
of Guilford in January, 1663. The mark of Uncas
affixed to the deed is a rude image of a turtle ; and that
of his son Ahaddon, alias Joshua, is a still more unsuc-
cessful attempt to represent a deer.
The rising power of Uncas and his alliance with the
English drew upon him the hatred of other Indian
chiefs, especially of Miantinomoh, head sachem of the
334 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Narragansets. Miantinomoh, while professing friend-
ship for the English, was suspected of complicity in a
plot for the destruction of all white men throughout
New England, and of those Indians who could not be
detached from their cause. After prompting several
vain attempts to assassinate Uncas, Miantinomoh
attacked him without warning, and without regard to an
engagement that he would not make war upon Uncas
without permission of the English. Miantinomoh being
defeated and taken prisoner, Uncas desired for his own
security to put him to death ; but not venturing to do so
without the consent of his white allies, brought him to
Hartford, and asked the advice of the governor and
magistrates of Connecticut. As these occurrences had
taken place in the summer of 1643, and the commis-
sioners of the confederate colonies were to hold their
first meeting in September, it was resolved to refer the
whole matter to their decision, Miantinomoh being
meanwhile left in the custody of the English. The
commissioners detdcrmined " that as it was evident that
Uncas could not be safe while Miantinomoh lived, but
that either by secret treachery or open force his life
would be continually in danger, he might justly put
such a false and blood-thirsty enemy to death." It was
further determined that if Uncas should be assailed on
account of the execution of Miantinomoh, the English
would, upon his desire, assist him against such violence.
The meeting of the commissioners was at Boston ; and
their determination in regard to Miantinomoh was kept
secret till Hopkins and Fenwick, commissioners from
Connecticut, and Eaton and Gregson, commissioners
from New Haven, had arrived home, some intimation
THE ABORIGINES. 335
having been received that if it was determined to give
Miantinomoh back to Uncas, these gentlemen would be
seized whilef on their journey home, and held as hostages
for the safety of the sachem.
The commissioners had stipulated that Miantinomoh
should not be tortured, and that his execution should
not take place within the jurisdiction of the English.
Accordingly, when the decision of the commissioners
was made known, Uncas, coming to Hartford, received
his prisoner, and led him not only beyond the jurisdic-
tion of Connecticut, but to the place of his capture
near Norwich. When they came upon the plain where
the battle had been fought, Wawequa, a brother of
Uncas, was walking behind Miantinomoh. Upon a
signal from his brother, Wawequa silently raised his
tomahawk, and sunk it into the head of the captive,
killing him with a single blow.
We have given this story of Miantinomoh and his
execution, not because it is part of the history of New
Haven, but because it explains some., parts of that his-
tory. It was this execution which occasioned the
sending of the six soldiers from New Haven a few
weeks after the event, the similar expedition about two
years afterward, and perhaps the temporary residence
of Uncas west of the Connecticut River in the inter-
vening time. The uneasiness observable for some years
among the Indians is also sometimes ascribed to the
execution of Miantinomoh ; but possibly, if he had con-
tinued to live, there might have been not only rumors
of war, but an actual coalition of many tribes against
the English. More than any other chieftain of his
time he possessed the qualities necessary for combining
336 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
whatever elements of hostility were lying separated and
scattered among the aborigines ; and the people of New
Haven and of the other colonies seem to have felt that
the danger of a general and destructive war was dimin-
ished by this victory of Uncas over Miantinomoh.
Uncas, though a faithful ally of the colonists, was
utterly untcachable in regard to English civilization,
morals, and religion. Standing over the fallen Mianti-
nomoh, he cut a piece of flesh from the shoulder of his
foe, and ate it, exclaiming, " It is the sweetest meat I
ever ate ! It makes my heart strong ! " De Forest
says, " He oppressed the Pcquots who were subject to
him ; he abused and plundered those who were not
properly his subjects ; he robbed one man of his wife ;
he robbed another man of his corn and beans ; he em-
bezzled wampum which he had been commissioned to
deliver to the English ; and he and his brother Wawe-
qua took every opportunity of subjecting, or at least
plundering, their neighbors. The colonists, however,
did not encourage him in these acts of violence ; and
sometimes, as the records of those times show, admin-
istered to him sharp rebukes, and even punishment."
Happening to be in New Haven on other business
when the commissioners were in session there in 1646,
he was called to answer several charges, one of which
was that he had beaten and plundered some Indians
employed by Englishmen to hunt near New London.
Uncas acknowledged that he had done wrong in using
violence so near an English settlement, but did not
appear very penitent for his ill treatment of the Indi-
ans. The next year the commissioners met at Boston,
and Uncas was again summoned to answer many com-
THE ABORIGINES. 337
plaints brought against him. That from New London
being renewed, he was fined one hundred fathom of
wampum, to be divided among those who had suffered
wrong at his hands. On this occasion Uncas did not
appear in person, but was represented by Foxon, a
sagamore who had been associated with him, apparently
from the beginning of his upward career, and by diplo-
matic ability had contributed much to the success of
his chief. Foxon was held in reputation, as the apostle
Eliot informs us, even among the Massachusetts tribes,
"as the wisest Indian in the country." He made a
dexterous defence on this occasrion, declaring that he
had never heard of some of the misdeeds charged ; pos-
itively denying others ; justifying, as in accord with
the laws and customs of the Indians, the appropria-
tion of Obechiquod's wife when her husband had fled
from the territories of his sachem, leaving her behind ;
and admitting the charge that Wawequa, at the head
of one hundred and thirty Mohegans, had attacked and
plundered the Nipmucks, carrying away thirty-five
fathoms of wampum, ten copper kettles, ten iarge
hempen baskets, and many bear-skins, deer-skins, and
other articles of value ; but claiming that Uncas, with
his chief men, was at New Haven when it was done,
and knew nothing of the affair ; that he never shared
in the spoils, and that some of his own Indians were
robbed at the same time.
So far was Uncas from receiving with favor the reli-
gion of his allies, that a contemporary mentions him as
an opposcr of Mr. Fitch, the first minister of Norwich,
in his endeavors to instruct the Mohegans in Chris-
tianity. " I am apt to fear,'* says Gookin in his " His-
338 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
torical Collections of the Indians in New England,"
" that a great obstruction to his labors is in the sachem
of those Indians, whose name is Uncas, an old and
wicked, wilful man, a drunkard, and otherwise very
vicious, who hath always been an opposer and under-
miner of praying to God." Fitch himself, in a letter
to Gookin, gives similar testimony, saying that Uncas
and the other sachems " at first carried it teachably and
tractably, until at length the sachems did discern that
religion would not consist with a mere receiving of the
Word, and that practical religion will throw down their
heathenish idols and the sachem's tyrannical monarchy ;
and then the sachems, discerning this, did not only
go away, but drew off their people, some by flatteries
and others by threatenings, and would not suffer them
to give so much as an outward attendance to the min-
istry of the word of God."
When Uncas went with Capt. Mason to fight against
his native tribe, he was accompanied by another saga-
more called by the English, Wequash, or Wequash Cook.
Perhaps his name in the Indian language was a word
of three syllables, as Wequashcuk. He was of the
Niantic tribe, the eldest son of its chief sachem, but
for some reason had not succeeded to his father's
place. As he is sometimes called a Pequot, it is sur-
mised that his mother was a Pequot, and of so low rank
that her children, according to Indian law and custom,
were obliged to give place to an uncle, who, upon the
death of their father, became chief sachem of the Nian-
tics. This uncle of Wequash was none other than
Kinigret, whom we have already had occasion to men-
THE ABORIGINES, 339
tion as, in later times, an enemy of the English. We-
quash, in 1637, when Uncas and he went with Mason,
was acknowledged as a sagamore by a few followers ;
but as the whole number of Indians in that expedition
was only seventy, and Uncas was so much more promi-
nent than Wequash that the latter is barely mentioned
by the historians, it is evident that his clan was not nu-
merous. Probably, as a sagamore, he was more nearly
on a par with Montowese than with Momaugin.
When Mason, after a march of about two miles be-
fore dawn of day, drew near to Mystic Fort, he sent for
his Indian allies to come to the front. Only Uncas
and Wequash came. Mason inquired of them where
the fort was. They replied that it was on the top of
the hill at whose foot they were now standing. " He
demanded of them where were the other Indians.
They answered that they were much afraid. The cap-
tain sent to them not to fly, but to surround the fort at
any distance they pleased, and see whether Englishmen
would fight." These timid allies did but very little fight-
ing, but they were interested and astonished observers.
The destruction of the fort and of its occupants made,
doubtless, upon all of them a profound impression of
respect for English power ; but in the mind of Wequash
it awakened a spirit of inquiry in regard to the English-
men's God, which led him finally to a hearty and influ-
ential reception of Christianity. An account of his
religious experience may perhaps be best given in the
language of an anonymous contemporary : —
" This man, a few years since, seeing and beholding the mighty
power of God in our English forces, how they fell upon the Pe-
quots, when divers hundreds of them were slain in an hour, the
340 HISTORY OF A^EIV HAVEN COLONY,
Lord as a God of glory in great terror did appear to the soul and
conscience of this poor wretch in that very act ; and though before
that time he had low apprehensions of our God, having conceived
him to be (as he said) but a mosquito God or a God like unto a
fly; and as mean thoughts of the English that served this God,
that they were silly, weak men ; yet from that time he was con-
vinced and persuaded that our God was a most dreadful God ; and
that one Englishman by the help of his God was able to slay and
put to flight an hundred Indians.
^* This conviction did pursue and follow him night and day, so
that he could have no rest or quiet because he was ignorant of the
Englishman's God : he went up and down bemoaning his condi-
tion, and filling ever}' place where he came with sighs and groans.
Afterward it pleased the Lord that some English well acquainted
with his language did meet with him ; thereupon, as a hart panting
after the water brooks, he enquired after God with such incessant
diligence that they were constrained constantly for his satisfaction
to spend more than half the night in conversing with him.
" Afterward he came to dwell amongst the English at Connecti-
cut V and travailing with all his might and lamenting after the
Lord, his manner was to smite his hand on his breast and td com-
plain sadly of his heart, saying it was much matchet (that is, very
evil), and when any spake with him, he would say, * Wequash no
God, Wequash no know Christ.' It pleased the Lord, that, in the
use of the means, he grew greatly in the knowledge of Christ and
in the principles of religion, and became thoroughly reformed
according to his light, hating and loathing himself for his dearest
sins, which were especially these two, lust and revenge. This
repentance for the former was testified by his temperance and
abstinence from all occasions or matter of provocation thereunto ;
secondly, by putting away all his wives, saving the first, to whom
he had most right. His repentance for the latter was testified by
an eminent degree of meekness and patience, that now, if any did
abuse him, he could lie down at their feet ; and if any did smite
him on the one cheek, he would rather turn the other than offend
them (many trials he had from the Indians in this case); secondly,
by going up and down to those he had offered violence or wrong
unto, confessing it, and making restitution.
THE ABORIGINES, ' 34I
"Afterward he went amongst the Indians, like that poor woman
of Samaria, proclaiming Christ, and telling them what a treasure
he had found, instructing them in the knowledge of the true God ;
and this he did with a grave and serious spirit, warning them with
all faithfulness to flee from the wrath to come, by breaking o5 their
sins and wickedness. This course of his did so disturb the devil
that ere long some of the Indians, whose hearts Satan had filled,
did secretly give him poison, which he took without suspicion ;
and, when he lay upon his death-bed, some Indians who were by
him wishing him, according to the Indian manner, to send for a
powwow, that is, a wizard ; he told them, * If Jesus Christ say
that Wequash shall live, then Wequash must live ; if Jesus Christ
say that Wequash shall die, then Wequash is willing to die,- and
will not lengthen out his life by any such means.' Before he died,
he did bequeath his child to the godly care of the English for
education and instruction, and so yielded up his soul into Christ's
hands." *
This anonymous witness, who was apparently a New-
England minister visiting the mother country, amplifies
more than any other the story of Wequash*s conversion
and subsequent Christian life ; but his story is in the
main corroborated by contemporaries writing over their
own names. Winthrop thus records the case : —
** Ont Wequash Cook, an Indian, living about Connecticut
River's mouth, and keeping much at Saybrook with Mr. Fenwick,
attained to good knowledge of the things of God and salvation by
Christ, so as he became a preacher to other Indians, and labored
much to convert them, but without any effect, for within a short
time he fell sick, not without suspicion of poison from them, and
died very comfortably."
* New England's First Fruits, London, printed by R. CJ. and G. D.
for Henry Overton, and are to be sold at his shop in Popes-head-alley.
1643.
342 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The fervent Thomas Shepard writes in a letter to a
friend : —
'* Wequash, the famous Indian at the river's mouth, is dead, and
certainly in heaven ; gloriously did the grace of Christ shine forth
in his conversation ; a year and a half before his death he knew
Christ; he loved Christ; he preached Christ up and down, and
then suffered martyrdom for Christ ; and when he died, he gave his
soul to Christ, and his only child to the English, rejoicing in this
hope that the child should know more of Christ than its poor
father ever did."
Roger Williams, mentioning Wequash in his "Key
into the Indian Languages," says, —
"Two days before his death, as I passed up to Connecticut
River, it pleased my worthy friend Mr. Fenwick, whom I visited at
his house in Saybrook Fort at the mouth of that river, to tell me
that my old friend Wequash lay very sick. I desired to see him,
and himself was pleased to be my guide two miles where Wequash
lay. Amongst other discourse concerning his sickness and death,
in which he freely bequeathed his son to Mr. Fenwick, I closed
with him concerning his soul. He told me that some two or three
years before, he had lodged at my house, when I acquainted him
with the condition of all mankind and his own in particular ; how
God created man and all things ; how man fell from God and his
present enmity against God, and the wrath of God against him
until repentance. Said he, ' Your words were never out of my heart
to this present, and me much pray to Jesus Christ.* I told him, so
did many English, French, and Dutch, who had never turned to
God, nor loved him. He replied in broken English, * Me so big-
naughty heart; me heart all one stone I* Savory expressions,
using to breathe from compunct and broken hearts and a sense of
inward hardness and unbrokenness. I had many discourses with
him in his life, but this was the sum of our last parting until our
general meeting."
Though Wequash did but little active fighting at
Mystic, he drew upon himself by his alliance with the
THE ABORIGINES, 343
English the deep hostility of some of his own race.
This hatred may have been afterward intensified by his
espousal of the religion of the white men. But if he
died by poison, it was doubtless his friendship for the
English which inflamed his murderers.
Indeed, from the first, his friends feared that his life
was in danger. Capt. Stoughton, sending home to the
governor and council of Massachusetts a report of his
expedition westward in pursuit of the remnant of the
Pequots, says, "For Wequash, we fear he is killed ; and
if he be, *tis a mere wicked plot ; and seeing he showed
faithfulness to us, and for it is so rewarded, it is hard
measure to us-ward ; and what is meet to be done
therein is difficult for me to conclude. I shall, there-
fore, desire your speedy advice."
If Wequash was in Stoughton's expedition, as this
mention of him suggests, he must have been a valua-
ble source of information in regard to Quinnipiac, for
he was in some way connected with the Indians of that
place. A deed, in which Uncas conveyed land to the
planters of Guilford, denies the ownership of other
Indians, who " have seemed to lay claim to these lands
aforesaid, as the sachem squaw of Quinnipiac, and
Wequash through her right, the one-eyed squaw of
Totoket, and others." Wequash himself, a few weeks
previous to this sale by Uncas, had signed a deed con-
veying a tract of land to Mr. Whitfield, alleging that he
derived his title from the sachem squaw of Quinnipiac.
For some reason which does not appear on the record,
the proprietors of New Haven accounted themselves
under obligation to Wequash ; for, under date of Nov.
29, 1641, "it is ordered that Wequash shall have a suit
344 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
of clothes made at the town's charge." As this was
but a few months before his death, and during that
year and a half which he spent in going up and down
preaching to the Indians, it may be conjectured that it
was in reward for such evangelistic labor expended on
the red men of Quinnipiac. But if such were the
occasion of the gift, why should it not appear on the
record ? More probably it was for information in
regard to Indian conspiracies ; for, nine months after
this gift to Wequash, and only one month after his
decease, a friendly sagamore came to Mr. Ludlow at
Fairfield, as he worked. in his hayfield, and discovered
a plot, .desiring "a promise that his name might be
concealed ; for, if it were known, it would cost him his
life, and he should be served as Wequash was for being
so faithful to the English." Promise of concealment
was made, and he related what he knew concerning
the plot in which Miantinomoh was concerned. It de-
signed, first, the assassination of Uncas, and then a
general and simultaneous massacre of the English.
" As soon as the sabbath was past, Mr. Ludlow rode
to New Haven, and there intended to take advice with
them, and so to proceed to Connecticut. But when he
came to New Haven, and procured Mr. Eaton, Mr.
Goodyear, and Mr. Davenport, to give him meeting,
and opened things unto them, they presently declared
there was an Indian from Long Island that had declared
the same to them vetbatim^ ' If this testimony be
trustworthy, it would seem that the death of Wequash
was the first fruits of a plot which intended the destruc-
tion of all the English, and of their Indian allies.
* Relation of the Indian plot Mass. Hist. Coll., XXIII. p. i6i.
THE ABORIGINES, 345
The reader may form some idea of Wequash's ward-
robe, when he learns, that, two months prevjous to the
gift of the English clothes by New Haven, he received
from Mr Whitfield, in payment for his land in Guilford,
"a frieze coat, a blanket, an Indian coat, one fathom
of Dutchman's coat, a shirt, a pair of stockings, a pair of
shoes, a fathom of wampum." .
The story of Wequash naturally leads to an account of
efforts within the colony of New Haven for the civiliza-
tion and evangelization of the aborigines. Wequash
was described on his tombstone at Lyme as the first
convert among the New England tribes ; but this state-
ment seems to have been made by one imperfectly
informed in regard to Plymouth and Massachusetts.
Palfrey mentions by name several Indians of whom
English Christians in those colonies entertained, at
an earlier date, "good hopes in their hearts.*' The
success of the evangelistic work of Eliot and the May-
hews in Massachusetts, a few years after the death of
Wequash, enkindled such interest in the mother country
that a corporation was created by act of Parliament,
"for the promoting and propagating of the gospel of
Jesus Christ in New England." Its charter directed
that the commissioners of the United Colonies of
New England, or such as they should appoint, should
have power to receive and dispose of the moneys
brought in "in such manner as should best and prin-
cipally conduce to the preaching and propagating of
the gospel amongst the natives, and the maintenance
of schools and nurseries of learning for the education
of the children of the natives." The funds thus pro-
346 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
vided were chiefly expended in the older colonies ; but,
in Connecticut, Mr. Blinman, the minister of New
London, and in the colony of New Haven, Mr. Pier^
son, the minister of Branford, were employed by this
corporation. The efforts of Mr. Fitch of Norwich to
instruct his heathen neighbors have been already men-
tioned. "The ministers of the several towns where
Indians lived," says Trumbull, "instructed them as
they had opportunity ; but all attempts for Christian-
izing the Indians in Connecticut were attended with
little success. They were engaged a great part of
their time in such implacable wars among themselves,
were so ignorant of letters and the English language,
and the English ministers in general were so entirely
ignorant of their dialect, that it was extremely diffi-
cult to teach them. Not one Indian church was ever
gathered by the English ministers in Connecticut.
Several Indians, however, in one town and another,
became Christians, and were baptized and admitted to
full communion in the English churches." This testi-
mony of Trumbull was intended to cover the territory
which had belonged to the colony of New Haven as truly
as the other part of Connecticut. Of the ministers of
the New Haven colony, Mr. Pierson seems to have been
most proficient in the Indian tongue; he "and his In-
dian" being employed as interpreters in the negotia-
tion of important business. He preached to the red
men in their own language, and commenced to pre-
pare a catechism, a part of which being submitted to
the commissioners of the United Colonies, at their
meeting, in 1656, they advised that it be completed,
and " turned into the Narraganset or Pequot, and for
THE ABORIGINES, 347
that purpose they spake with and desired Thomas
Stanton to advise with Mr. Pierson about a fit season
to meet and translate the same." Mr. Pierson, dis-
pleased at the absorption of New Haven by Connecti-
cut, removed out of the colony. Perhaps a few years
more of perseverance might have produced a much
greater result, and brought to view some fruits of the
labor expended, which, by reason of its untimely ces-
sation, have remained unknown.
But, though comparatively little was accomplished by
preaching to the Indians in their own tongue, many
youth, being received into English families, were in-
structed as if they had been bom in the house ; so that
after a few years from the beginning, there were civil-
ized and Christian Indians living among the English,
speaking English, wearing English cloth, owning land,
following trades, and frequenting the public assemblies
on the Lord's day.
s
CHAPTER XVI.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE.
IN a former chapter the mansion of Gov. Eaton has
been described with nearly as much of detail as
it is now possible to give. The fame of three other'
houses, as handed down by tradition, has also been
mentioned. President Stiles relates, on the authority
of one of the mechanics who demolished the Allerton
house, that the wood was all of oak, and of the best
joiner-work. Ranking next to these four were other
houses of framed timber, smaller and less stately, but
equal and similar to the ordinary dwelling-house of the
seventeenth and the first half of the eighteenth cen-
turj", a few specimens of which still remain in almost
every ancient town. In shape they differed one from
another as old houses differ in the same neighborhood
in England; but they probably were copies, in inost
cases, of some style of house prevalent in the county
or parish where the emigrant had been born. Com-
monly they had two stories, though some, being in the
lean-to shape, showed a second story only in front.
Often the second story projected over the first ; and this
style, though not devised for such an end, but copied
from numerous examples in the mother country, was
regarded as especially convenient for defensive warfare
348
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE.
349
against savage foes. Lower in rank than these framed
buildings were log houses, which, when small and built
with Utile expenditure of joiner-work, were called huts
rather than houses j as on a western prairie a log cabin
is even now distinguished from a log house.
In Guilford several dwellings, as well as the meeting-
house, were built of stone.
In the summer of 1651
the record was made,
"The meeting-house ap- ,
pointed to be thatched '
and clayed before win-
ter." This order indi-
cates that the stone was
not laid in mortar, but, as many stone chimneys which
have lasted to our time, in clay. In the course of years
the clay had fallen out, and the walls, that they might
exclude the cold winds of winter, needed to be again
pointed with this substi-
tute for mortar. The
order to thatch, shows
that in Guilford, if not in
the other plantations, a
thatched roof was thought
worthy to cover their
most honored edifices.
Among the dwellings in Guilford which were built of
stone, was that of Mr. Whitfield, the minister. It is
mentioned by Palfrey, in his " History of New Eng-
land" as "the oldest house in the United States now
standing as originally built, unless there be older at St.
Augustine in Florida." Since the publication of Mr,
350 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Palfrey's History, great changes have been wrought in
the appearance and internal arrangement of the house,
but it still preserves an aspect of antiquity. The fol-
lowing description, with the accompanying plans, was
furnished to Mr. Palfrey by Mr. Ralph D. Smith of
Guilford : —
"The walls are of stone, from a ledge eighty rods
distant to the east. It was probably brought on hand-
barrows, across a swamp, over a rude causey which is
still to be traced. A small addition, not here repre-
sented, has in modem times been made to the back of
the house ; but there is no question that the main build-
ing remains in its original state, even to the oak of the
beams, floors, doors, and window-sashes. The following
representations of the interior exhibit accurately the
dimensions of the rooms, windows, and doors, the thick-
ness of the walls, &c., on a scale of ten feet to the
inch.« The single dotted lines represent fireplaces and
doors. The double dotted lines represent windows.
In the recesses of the windows are broad seats. With-
in the memory of some of the residents of the town,
the panes of glass were of diamond shape.
" The height of the first story is seven feet and two-
thirds. The height of the second is six feet and three-
quarters. At the southerly corner in the second story
there was originally an embrasure, about a foot wide,
with a stone flooring, which still remains. The exterior
walls are now closed up, but not the walls within.
" The walls of the front and back of the house termi-
nate at the floor of the attic, and the rafters lie upon
' In this volume the horizontal sections of the house are reduced in
size, so that the scale is twenty feet to the inch.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE.
351
them. The angle of the roof is 60**, making the base
and sides equal. At the end of the wing, by the chim-
ney, is a recess, which must have been intended as a
FIRST FLOOR.
SECOND FLOOR.
place of concealment. The interior wall has the ap-
pearance of touching the chimney, like the wall at the
north-west end ; but the removal of a board discovers
two closets, which project beyond the lower part of the
building.**
The Whitfield house dif-
fered from the typical New
England dwelling, both in the
material of which it was built,
and in its interior arrange-
ment. Houses were usually
supported, not by walls of
stone, but by frames of heavy
timber. White oak was a fa-
vorite wood for this purpose, and some of the larger
pieces were considerably more than a foot square. Mr.
Whitfield, though he was a man of wealth, had no more
apartments in his dwelling than the average New Eng-
ATTIC FLOOR.
352 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
land planter. It is not easy to conjecture where he had
his study, nor where he lodged his ten children, some
of whom were nearly or quite adult when he came to
Guilford. His house seems small for the requirements
of his family and of his calling, and surprisingly small
in contrast with that of the minister of New Haven.
Mr. Davenport had but one child ; but there were thir-
teen fireplaces in his house, while in Mr. Whitfield's
there were but five.
A framed house not exceeding that of Mr. Whit-
field in its dimensions, would have but one chimney,
which would be in the middle of the house, and not in
the outer wall, as in a house of stone. Such a chimney
measured about ten feet in diameter where it passed
through the first floor, being even larger in the cellar
and tapering as it ascended ; the fire-place in one of the
apartments of the first floor being six or eight feet
long. A door in the middle of the front side of the
house opened into a hall, which contained the principal
stairway on the side opposite to the entrance, and
opened on the right hand and on the left into front
rooms used as parlors, but furnished, one or both of
them, with beds, which, if not commonly in use, stood
ready to answer such drafts upon hospitality as are fre-
quent in a new countrj', \yhere all travelling is by
private conveyance. The apartment most used by the
family, in which they cooked and ate their food and,
in winter, gathered about the spacious fireplace, was in
the rear of the chimney. At one end of it was a small
bed-room, and at the other, a butter}'.
The frame of such a house was covered with clap-
boards or with shingles, and, after a little experience, the
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 353
planters learned to prefer cedar shingles to perishable
and inflammable thatch as a covering for the roof. The
floors were of thick oak boards, fastened with wooden
pins. The rooms were plastered only on the sides,
the joists and floor above being exposed to view. In
the parlors, the side contiguous to the chimney was
usually wainscoted, and thus displayed wide panels
from the largest trees of the primeval forest. The
window-sashes, bearing glass cut into small diamond-
shaped panes, and set with lead, were hung with hinges
to the window-frames, and opened outward. The doors
were of upright boards, fastened together with battens,
and had wooden latches. The outside doors were made
of two layers of board, one upright and one transverse,
fastened together with clinched nails so arranged as to
cover the door with diamond-shaped figures of equal
dimension. The front door was made in two valves,
which, when closed, met in the middle, and were fast-
ened in that position by a wooden bar, placed across
from one lintel to the other, and secured by iron staples.
Farm-houses were commonly built near a spring,
which supplied water for domestic use, as well as for the
cattle. If a well was dug, either in town or in country,
the water was drawn from it by means of a sweep
moving vertically on a fulcrum at the top of a post.
From the lighter end of the well-sweep a smaller pole
or rod, with a bucket attached, was suspended. When
the bucket had been lowered and dipped, the sweep
was so nearly poised that the water could be drawn
up with little effort. The following record shows that
pumps were not unknown : " Robert Johnson desired
that he might have liberty to make a well in the street
354 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
near his house. The Court, fearing some danger might
come by it, propounded that he, and his neighbors
joining with him, would put a pump in it ; whereupon he
took time to speak with them, and consider of it." This
was in 1649. Six years afterward, when the younger
Winthrop was expected to spend the winter in New
Haven, Mr. Davenport writes to him that Mrs. Daven-
port had taken care of his apples, had provided twenty
loads of wood, thirty bushels of wheat, fifty pounds
of candles, tables, and some chairs, and a cleanly,
thrifty maid-servant for Mrs. Winthrop, and had caused
the well to be cleaned, and a new pump to be set up.
In the seventeenth century, as compared with the
present day, household furniture was rude and scanty,
even in England ; and doubtless emigration to a new
country deprived the planters of New England of some
domestic conveniences which they might have pos-
sessed if they had remained at home. A few of the
most distinguished men in New Haven had tapestry
hangings in their principal apartments ; and Gov. Eaton
had, in addition to such luxuries, two Turkey carpets,
a tapestry carpet, a green carpet fringed, and a small
green carpet, besides rugs ; but the mansion of a planter
who had been a London merchant is no more fit to be
taken as a fair specimen of contemporary dwellings than
the hut in which the pit-man in a saw-pit sheltered his
family. The floors in the house of a planter whom his
neighbors called " Goodman," and generally in the
houses of men to whose names the title of Mr. was pre-
fixed, were bare of carpets. Excepting the beds, which
stood in so many of the apartments, the most conspicu-
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 355
ous and costly piece of furniture in the house was, per-
haps, a tall case of drawers in the parlor. It was called
a case of drawers, and not a bureau ; for at that time a
writing-board was a principal feature of a bureau. If,
as was sometimes the case, there were drawers in the
lower part, and a chest at the top, it was called a chest
of drawers. This form, being in itself less expensive,
received less of ornament, and was to be found even
in the cottages of the poor. Still another form had
drawers below and doors above, which, being opened,
revealed small drawers for the preservation of important
papers or other articles of value. This form was some-
times called a cabinet. After the death of Gov. Eaton
" there was found in his cabinet a paper fairly written
with his own ' hand, and subscribed also with his own
hand, having his seal also thereunto affixed," which
was accepted as his last will and testament, "though
not testified by any witnesses, nor subscribed by any
hands as witnesses.*' The inventory of Gov. Eaton
does not mention a cabinet, but specifies among the
items "in the green chamber," which was evidently
the most elegant of his apartments, a cupboard with
drawers. This was doubtless, under a more homely
name, the same piece of furniture, which^ in the pro-
bate record, is called a cabinet.
The inventory of Gov. Eaton makes no mention of a
clock, and probably there was none in the colony of
New Haven while he lived, unless his friend Davenport
had so early become the possessor of the "clock with
appurtenances," which, after the death of its owner,
was appraised at ;f 5.
At a later date a clock outranked the case of drawers
3S6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
however elegant, by its greater rarity and greater cost.
For a long time after their first appearance, clocks
were to be found only in the dwellings of the opulent,
the generality of the people measuring time by noon-
marks and sun-dials.
Table furniture, as compared with that of the present
day, was especially scanty. Forks were not in common
use in England till after the union of New Haven with
Connecticut, though, as Palfrey suggests, there was a
very liberal supply of napkins as if fingers were some-
times used for forks. Spoons used by families of the
middle class were commonly of a base metal called
alchymy, though some such families had a few spoons
of silver. But if silver ware was not in general use,
families of opulence seem to have been well supplied
with it. Gov. Eaton had, including the basin and ewer
presented to Mrs. Eaton by the Eastland Fellowship,
;f 140 worth of plate. Mr. Davenport's plate was ap-
praised at ;f so. One of the items was a silver tankard,
still preserved in the family.'
Table-dishes were generally of wood or of pewter,
though China and earthen ware are specified in the
inventory of Mr. Davenport's estate. Vessels of glass
are also sometimes mentioned in inventories. Drink-
ing-vessels, called cans, were cups of glass, silver, or
pewter, with bandies attached to them. Porringers
were small, bowl-shaped vessels, for holding the porridge
commonly served for breakfast or supper. Usually
they were of pewter and supplied with handles. Meat
was brought to the table on platters of pewter or of
* An engraving of it may be seen in " The Davenport Family," by A.
B. Davenport, Supplementary Edition, p. 404.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 357
wood, and from these was transferred to wooden
trenchers ; which, in their cheapest form, were square
pieces of board, but often were cut by the lathe into
the circular shape of their porcelain successors.*
In all but the most wealthy families, food was cooked
in the apartment where it was eaten, and at the large
fireplace, which by its size distinguished the most fre-
quented apartment of the house. A trammel in the
chimney, by means of its hook, which could be moved
up or down according to the amount of fuel in use at
the time, held the pot or kettle at the proper distance
above the fire. At one end of the fireplace was an
oven in the chimney. Supplementary to these instru-
ments for boiling and baking were a gridiron, a long-
handled frying-pan, and a spit for roasting before the
fire. At the end of the room, pewter platters, por-
ringers, and basins, when not in use, were displayed on
open shelves ; and hanging against the wide panels of
the wainscot were utensils of tin and brass, the bright-
ness of the metals showing forth the comparative merit
of the housekeeping. The brass-ware included such
articles as the ladle, the skimmer, the colander, and the
warming-pan.
The diet of the planters necessarily consisted chiefly
* Persons are still living, who can remember when wooden trenchers
were in general use in England, instead of the porcelain plates which even
the poorest householder now provides. A middle-aged farmer in Sussex
told me that in his childhood trenchers were more common than plates,
and pointed out a mill where the trenchers were turned ; and I have re-
cently seen in a newspaper an account, by a living graduate of the Wyke-
ham School at Winchester, of the table fare in that school when he was a
boy, in which he says that they ate on square trenchers.
3S8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
of domestic products, though commerce, as we have
seen, supplied the tables of the wealthy with sugar,
foreign fruits, and wines. Kine and sheep were few
during the early years of the colony, but there was such
an abundance and variety of game that the scarcity of
beef and mutton was but a small inconvenience.* In
towns, venison brought in by English or Indian hunters
was usually to be obtained of the truck-master ; and at
the farms, wild geese, wild turkeys, moose, and deer,
were the prizes of the sharp-shooter. The air in spring
and autumn was sometimes perceptibly 'darkened with
pigeons ; the rivers were full of fish ; on the sea-shore
there was plenty of clams, oysters, and mussels. Poul-
try and swine soon multiplied to such an extent that
they could be used for the table ; and within ten years
from the foundation of New Haven, beef had become an
article of export. The abundance of game, of pork,
and of poultry, doubtless hastened the exportation of
this commodity. Tillage produced besides the maize,
the beans, and the squashes, indigenous to the countr}',
almost every variety of food to which they had been
accustomed in England.
The diet for breakfast and supper was frequently por-
ridge made of meat, sometimes salt meat, and of pease,
beans, or other vegetables. Frequently it was mush
and milk. A boiled pudding of Indian meal, cooked in
the same pot with the meat and vegetables which fol-
lowed it, was often the first and principal course at
* Winthrop, before his wife came out, writes to her, " We are here in
a paradise. Though we have not beef and mutton, yet (God be praised)
we want them not : our Indian com answers for all. Yet here is fowl and
fish in great plenty."
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE, 359
dinner. It seems to have been assigned to the first
course in the interest of frugality, to spare the more
expensive pork and beef. Of esculent roots the turnip
was far more highly prized and plentifully used than the
potato. Tea and coffee had not yet come into general
use so as to be articles of commerce even in England,
but beer was the common drink of Englishmen at
home and in America. A brew-house was regarded as
an essential part of a homestead in the New Haven
colony, and beer was on the table as regularly as
bread.*
While the breakfast, dinner, and supper, described
above, may be taken as a specimen of the diet fre-
quently appearing on the table of a New England fam-
ily in the seventeenth century, they are by no means to
be regarded as a rule from which there was no varia-
tion. There were flesh-days and there were fish-days in
every week ; and on Saturday, the oven being heated for
baking bread, a pot of beans was put in, which, being
allowed to remain for twenty-four hours, furnished a
warm supper for the family when they returned from
public worship. There was variation from and addi-
tion to the ordinary fare on those numerous occasions
when friends, travelling on horseback, stopped to spend
the night, or to rest in the middle of the day. Then
the table was burdened with variety and abundance
according to the means of the family and the provi-
' New Haven Town Records, Dec i, 1662. "Deacon Peck informed
the town that they were much troubled to supply the elders with wheat
and malt, and he feared there was want : therefore desired the town to
consider of it The deputy-governor urged it that men would endeavor
to make a present supply for them.**
36o HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
dence of the mistress. Feasting reached its acme on
the day of the annual thanksgiving, when there was
such plenty of roast meats, and so extraordinary an
outcome from the oven, that ordinary diet was for some
days afterward displaced by the remains of the feast.
No picture of domestic life in New England could
be complete which did not exhibit the family observing
the annual thanksgiving. Rejecting Christmas because
of the superstitions which had attached themselves to
it, the Puritans established in its place another festival,
which became equally domestic in the manner of its
obser\'^ance. Children who had left their parents to
prepare for the duties of adult life, or to occupy homes
which they themselves had established, were gathered
again in the home of their nativity, or under the roof
of those whom they had learned since they were
married to call father and mother. Here they re-
counted the blessings of the year, and united in giving
thanks to God. If there were children's children, they
came with their parents, and spent the hours which
remained after worship in feasting and frolic.
Family worship was an important feature of domestic
life in a Puritan household. It was important because
of its frequency, regularity, and seriousness. When-
ever the family came to the table for breakfast, dinner,
or supper, there was a grace before meat, and when
they left it, a grace after meat, every person standing
by his chair while the blessing was asked, and the
thanks were given. The day was begun with worship,
which included the reading of Scripture and prayer,
and ended with a similar service, all standing during the
prayer. A member of Gov. Eaton's family reports : —
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 36 1
"It was his custom, when he first rose in a morning, to repair
unto his study ; a study well perfumed with the meditations and
supplications of a holy soul. After this, calling his family together,
he would then read a portion of the Scripture among them, and after
some devout and useful reflections upon it, he would make a prayer
not long, but extraordinarily pertinent and reverent ; and in the
evening some of the same exercises were again attended. On the
Saturday morning he would still take notice of the approaching
sabbath in his prayer, and ask the grace to be remembering of it
and preparing for it ; and when the evening arrived, he, besides
this, not only repeated a sermon, but also instructed his people
with putting of questions referring to the points of religion, which
would oblige them to study for an answer ; and if their answer
were at any time insufficient, he would wisely and gently enlighten
their understanding ; all which he concluded by singing a psalm."
In the New Haven colony, the Lord's day began,
according to the Hebrew manner of reckoning, at sun-
set. Saturday was the preparation day. The diet for
the morrow was made ready so far as was possible, and
the house was put in order. The kitchen floor received
its weekly scrubbing, and the floor of the parlor was
sprinkled anew with the white sand from the sea-shore.
Before the sun had disappeared beneath the western
horizon, the ploughmen had returned from the fields ;
the mistress and her maids had brought the house-work
to a stop. Because " the evening and the morning were
the first day " they began their sabbath observance at
evening. It was because Saturday evening was a part
of the Lord's day that the master of a house added to
the usual family worship some endeavor to impart
religious instruction to his children and servants.
New Haven retained its custom of beginning the
Lord's day at evening, through the seventeenth and
362 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
eighteenth centuries. Whatever may have been the
disadvantages of the custom, they were of a worldly,
and not of a spiritual, nature. Perhaps less labor was
accomplished ; though it admits of question whether
the subtraction of an hour or two from the work-time
of Saturday did not by a more thorough restoration of
strength to the laborer increase rather than diminish
the labor accomplished. There can be no question that
the New Haven custom was more favorable to the reli-
gious improvement of the Lord's day than that, which,
by exacting extra hours of labor on Saturday, occasions
unusual fatigue at the end of the week. It is also indis-
putable that the New Haven custom exerted a refining
influence by means of the social intercourse on Sunday
evening, for which it afforded opportunity. Every
house was then dressed ; and every person, even if
obliged on other days to delve and drudge, was in his
best apparel. Sunday in the New Haven colony was
at once a holy day and a holiday, the Puritan restraint
with which it was kept till sunset giving place in the
evening to recreation and social converse.
Though young men were by law forbidden " to invei-
gle or draw the affections of any maid .without the con-
sent of father, master, guardian, governor, or such other
who hath the present interest or charge, or, in the
absence of such, of the nearest magistrate, whether it
be by speech, writing, message, company-keeping, un-
necessary familiarity, disorderly night-meetings, sinful
dalliance, gifts," or any other way, yet every respect-
able young man knew of some house where he might
meet on Sunday evening one of the maidens whom
he had seen in the opposite gallery of the meeting-
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 363
house, without fear that her father, master, guardian,
or governor would be displeased
The marriages which resulted from these Sunday
evening visits of the young men, were not solemnized
by a minister of religion, but, according to the Puritan
view of propriety, by a magistrate.* The requirement
that marriage should be contracted before an officer of
the civil authority, was a protest against the position
that marriage is a sacrament of the church. It is said
that the first marriage in Guilford was celebrated in the
famous mansion of the minister, "the wedding table
being garnished with the substantial luxuries of pork
and pease." Probably this was the marriage of the
pastor's daughter to Rev. John Higginson. But though
the bride was his own daughter, Mr. Whitfield had no
legal authority to pronounce the couple husband and
wife. Clandestine marriage was carefully prevented by
the requirement that the intention of the parties should
be three times published at some time of public lecture
or town meeting, or " be set up in writing upon some
post of their meeting-house door, in public view, there
to stand so as it may be easily read, by the space of
fourteen days.'* Although the same statute required
that the marriage should be in "a public place," this
requirement was sufficiently answered when specta-
tors were present ; and usually marriages were solemn-
ized at the home of the bride, and accompanied, as in
the Whitfield mansion, with feasting.
' I have seen a parish register in England where for a century all
marriages are recorded as solemnized by the clergyman; then, without a
word of explanation, all marriages for several years are recorded as con-
tracted before a justice of the peace ; then, without explanation, the record
returns to its old formula. Marriage by a magistrate marks the time of
the commonwealth.
364 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
A marriage implied a new home, — perhaps a farm to
be cut out of the primeval forest, and a house to be
built with lumber yet in the log. A portion of the
work had preceded the marriage, but a life-long task
remained. The people were generally frugal and in-
dustrious, and the women in their sphere were as truly
so as the men. The mistress, and her maids if she had
them, were as busy in the house as the master and his
servants in the fields. Besides the house-work, the
dairy-work, the sewing, and the knitting, there was
everywhere spinning, and in some houses weaving.
They spun cotton, linen, and wool. New Haven prob-
ably had in its Yorkshire families special skill in the
manufacture of cloth. Johnson, speaking in his " Won-
der Working Providenge " of that part of Mr. Rogers's
company which began a settlement in Massachusetts
and called it Rowley after the name of their former
home in Yorkshire, says, " They were the first people
that set upon making of cloth in the western world,
for which end they built a fulling-mill, and caused their
little ones to be very diligent in spinning cotton, many
of them having been clothiers in England." . This in-
dustry, so far at least as spinning is concerned, spread
through the whole community. Every farmer raised
flax, which his wife caused to be wrought into linen ;
and wherever sheep were kept, wool was spun into yarn
for the knitting-needles and the loom. A young woman
who could spin, between sunrise and sunset, more than
thirty knots of warp or forty of filling, was in high es-
timation among sagacious neighbors having marriage-
able sons. This industry occupied a chamber in the
dwelling-house, or a separate building in the yard. The
r*»^^
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE, 365
music of the wheel was frequently accompanied with
song. Tradition relates that when Whalley and Goffe
^v.is were concealed at Milford in a cellar under a spinning-
shop, the maids, being accustomed to sing at their work,
and unaware that any but themselves were within hear-
ing, sang a satirical ballad concerning the regicides,
and that the concealed auditors were so much amused
that they entreated their friend, the master of the
family, to procure a repetition of the song.
The simple, regular life of a planter's family was
favorable to health. As compared with the present time
there was but little excitement and but little worry
for man or woman. As compared with Old England in
the seventeenth century. New Haven, during the twen-
ty-seven years in which it was a separate jurisdiction,
might be called a healthy region. England was then
often ravaged by the plague. In Sandwich in Kent
there were, on the 12th of March, 1637, that is, about
six weeks before the first company of New Haven
planters sailed from London, "seventy-eight houses
and one hundred and eighty-eight persons infected.*'
On the 30th of June, that is, four days after the Hector
arrived in Boston, " twenty-four houses and tents were
shut up, in which were one hundred and three persons.
From the 6th of July to the Sth of October there
were buried in St. Clement's parish about ten every
week who died of the plague." While Mr. Davenport
was vicar of St. Stephen's, the city of London was
visited with a pestilence which swept away thirty-five
thousand of its inhabitants. The parish register re-
cords the vote of the parishioners " that Mr. Davenport
366 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
shall have of the parish funds in respect of his care and
pains taken in time of the visitation of sickness, as a
gratuity, the sum of ;f 20."
In coming to New Haven, the planters found a more
salubrious or certainly a less deadly atmosphere than
they had breathed in England; nevertheless they
were grievously afflicted with sickness, malaria having
been more prevalent than in the other New England
colonies.
"It is not annual," says Hubbard, "as in Virginia,
there being sundry years when there is nothing consid-
erable of it, nor ordinarily so violent and universal;
yet at some times it falls very hard upon the inhabit-
ants, not without strange varieties of the dispensations
of Providence ; for some years it hath been almost uni-
versal upon the plantations, yet little mortality; at
other times, it hath been very mortal in a plantation or
two, when others that have had as many sick, have
scarcely made one grave ; it hath been known also in
some years that some one plantation hath been singled
out and visited after a sore manner when others have
been healthy round about." Much has been written
of the depression which settled upon the town of New
Haven in consequence of the failure of its expectations
in regard to commerce ; but perhaps the prevalence of
malaria may have had much to do with the discourage-
ment of the people, for, as this disease in modem times
takes away the energy and* hopefulness of the patient,
so it was then, as Hubbard testifies, "attended with
great prostration of spirits."
The following record shows not only that the years
1658 and 1659 were very sickly in the principal planta-
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 367
tion, but that there was a general remissness in paying
the physician. At a town meeting, Jan. 29, 1660: —
" Mr. Augur declared that (it having pleased God to visit the
town sorely by sickness the two last years) his stock of physic is
gone, and how to procure more out of his returns he saw not, being
disabled by the non-payment of some and the unsuitable payment
of others. To get supplies, those that were Mr. Augur's debtors
were called upon to attend their duty. It was also declared that
if Mr. Augur see cause to bring any of them to the court, it will
be witnessed against as a wrong to the public, that a physician
should be discouraged."
As Mr. Augur had signified about a year before, his
intention to lay down the practice of physic because his
pay was not brought in with satisfactory promptnesis,
and the neglect to pay him had been "witnessed
against as an act of unrighteousness," probably there
was some temporary virtue in the witnessing of the
General Court in his behalf.
Mr. Augur was at this time the only physician in the
town of New Haven, Mr. Pell and Mr. Westerhouse
having removed some years before. That he was not
in high repute appears from attempts which were made
to procure another physician. In November, 165 1,
soon after Mr. Pell's removal : —
" The governor acquainted the Court that there is a physician
come to the town, who, he thinks, is willing to stay here, if he
may have encouragement. He is a Frenchman ; but hath lived in
England and in Holland a great while, and hath good testimonials
from both places, and from the University of Franeker where he
hath approved himself in his disputations able in understanding in
that art; and Mr. Davenport saith, he finds in discourse with him,
that his abilities answer the testimony given. Now the town may
consider what they will do in the cast, for it is not good to neglect
368 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
such providences of God when they are oflFered. The Court, after
consideration, desired the former committee to speak with him,
and desire his settling amongst us ; and that he may have a house
provided, and encouraged in provisions and what also is necessary,
to the value of ten pounds."
The committee reported soon after " that they had
spoken with the French doctor, and find his wants so
many that ten pounds will go but a little way in provid-
ing for him.** But so strong was the desire to have Dr.
Chais remain, that a house was procured, and furniture
was loaned by divers persons. In less than three
months '*the magistrates and elders were desired to
speak with the doctor, and see if they cannot settle a
more moderate price for his visiting of sick folk than
he hath yet taken ;" and in a little more than a year after
the town had invited him to settle, they consented "that
he shall have liberty to go, as he sees he hath opportu-
nity."
Unable to retain Dr. Chais, some obtained medical
advice and medicines from John Winthrop, jun., who
resided at Pcquot, afterward named New London. Mr.
Davenport sends an Indian, as a special messenger, with
a letter dated Aug. 20, 1653, inquiring how he can best
consult with him about the state of his body, whether by
coming to Pequot to sojourn for a time, or by accom-
panying Winthrop on a journey, — which he has heard
that the latter intends to make to Boston, — or by wait-
ing for Winthrop to visit New Haven after his return
from the Bay. In the spring of 1655, he says, " The win-
ter hath been extraordinarily long and sharp and sickly
among us." " My family hath been kept from the com-
mon sickness in this town, by the goodness and mercy of
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 369
God, this winter ; only Edmund, my man-servant, hath
been exercised with it near unto death." Soon after
this, Winthrop took Mr. Malbon's house, and for the
space of two or three years resided part of the time in
New Haven, very much to the content of those who
did not think highly of Mr. Augur's skill. The town
were so desirous of securing Winthrop, that they would
have freely given the use of the house ; but he was a
man unwilling to be put under obligation, and there-
fore the house was sold to him for ;£icx) to be paid in
goats at his farm on Fisher's Island. He ceased to
reside in New Haven before the great sickness of 1658
and 1659, and sold the house back to the town in the
last named year. Mr. Davenport, writing to him during
the sickness, mentions such symptoms as gripings,
vomitings, fluxes, agues and fevers, giddiness, much
sleepiness, and burning. He says, "It comes by fits
every other day." He informs him that the supply of
medicine he had left with Mrs. Davenport is spent.
" The extremities of the people have caused her to part
with what she reserved for our own family, if need
should require." He adds in a postscript, "Sir, my
wife desires a word or two of advice from you, what is
best to be done for those gripings and agues and fevers ;
but she is loth to be too troublesome ; yet as the cases
are weighty, she desires to go upon the surest ground,
and to take the safest courses, and knoweth none whose
judgment she can so rest in as in yours."
With all the despondency resting upon the town,
there was mingled the same comfort which comforts all
communities afflicted with malaria ; namely, the convic-
tion that the evil is not so great as in some other
370 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
places. Mr. Davenport, when writing that "many are
afflictively exercised," adds, "though more moderately
in this town, by the mercy of God, than at Norwalk
and Fairfield. Young Mr. Allerton, who lately came
from the Dutch, saith they are much more sorely visited
there, than these parts are. It is said that at Maspeag
the inhabitants are generally so ill that they are likely
to lose their harvest through want of ability to reap
it."
It is evident that the care of the sick must have been
an important part of domestic life in New Haven while
these malarial diseases prevailed. With more or less of
skill, and more or less of success, ever)' family nursed its
sick. There was sickness alike in the hut of the mean
man, and in the mansion of the governor. Death with
impartial step entered where he pleased. With what
degree of skill the disease was combated at first, the
reader may guess from the declaration of Hubbard that
the "gentle conductitious aiding of nature hath been
found better than sudden and violent means by purga-
tion or otherwise ; and blood-letting, though much used
in Europe for fevers, especially in the hotter countries,
is found deadly in this fever, even almost without escap-
mg.
The restraint which the Puritans put upon their
feelings appears, perhaps, more wonderful when death
entered the house, than at any other time. We have a
detailed report of the manner in which Gov. Eaton
carried himself when his eldest son was called to die : —
" His eldest son he maintained at the college until he proceeded
master of arts ; and he was indeed the son of his vows, and the
SOD of great hopes. But a severe catarrh diverted this young
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE, 37 1
gentleman from the work of the ministry, whereto his father had
once devoted him : and a mah'gnant fever, then raging in those
parts of the country, carried off him with his wife within two or
three days of one another. This was counted the sorest of all the
trials that ever befell his father in the days of the years of his
pilgrimage, but he bore it with a patience and composure of spirit
truly admirable. His dying son looked earnestly on him, and said,
* Sir, what shall we do ? * Whereto, with a well-ordered counte-
nance, he replied, * Look up to God ! ' And when he passed by his
daughter, drowned in tears on this occasion, to her he said,
* Remember the sixth commandment; hurt not yourself with immod-
erate grief ; remember Job, who said, " The Lord hath given, and
the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."
You may mark what a note the spirit of God put upon it, — "In all
this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly." God accounts it
a charging him foolishly when we don't submit unto him patiently.'
Accordingly he now governed himself as one that had attained
unto the rule of weeping as if he wept not ; for, it being the Lord's
day, he repaired unto the church in the afternoon, as he had been
there in the forenoon, though he was never like to see his dearest
son alive any more in this world. And though, before the first
prayer began, a messenger came to prevent Mr. Davenport's pray-
ing for the sick person who was now dead, yet his affectionate
father altered not his course, but wrote after the preacher as
formerly ; and when he came home, he held on his former methods
of divine worship in his family, not, for the excuse of Aaron,
omitting any thing in the service of God. In like sort, when the
people had been at the solemn interment of this his worthy son,
he did with a very unpassionate aspect and carriage then say^
* Friends, I thank you all for your love and help, and for this testi-
mony of respect unto me and mine : the Lord hath given, and the
Lord hath taken ; blessed be the name of the Lord.' Never-
theless, retiring hereupon into the chamber where his daughter
then lay sick, some tears were observed falling from him while he
uttered these words, * There is a difference between a sullen silence
or a stupid senselessness under the hand of God, and a child-like
submission thereunto.' "
372 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Not all Puritans attained so near to the Puritan ideal
as Theophilus Eaton, but all had something of his self-
control. They governed themselves as seeing Him
who is invisible.
Social life among the planters of the New Haven
colony had for its basis contemporary social life in Eng-
land, but was modified by Puritanism, and by emigra-
tion to a wilderness. Some features of it;, which seem
strange to one who is acquainted only with the present
age, were brought with them across the water, and dis-
appeared earlier than in the old country. They brought
with them English ideas of social rank, of the relative
duties of parents and children, of the reser\'e and seclu-
sion proper for young women, and of the super\-ision
under which young people of the different sexes might
associate. They did not originate the public sentiment
or the legislation on these subjects which provokes the
merriment of the present age.
Their religious convictions of course influenced their
social life. It would be impossible that any community
as homogeneous and earnest in religion as they were,
should not have some peculiarity springing from this
source. A peculiarity of the Puritans was seriousness.
Such convictions as they cherished will necessarily pro-
duce more than an average seriousness of manner ; and
if this be true in a prosperous community whose tranquil-
lity has not been disturbed for a generation, we should
expect to find even more seriousness among a people
who have expatriated themselves for their religious con-
victions. If we again take Theophilus Eaton as an
illustration, he was a man of gravity when residing in
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 373
London and in the East countries. He would have
been such if the Puritan party had been in power, and
he consequently in security. He was probably more so
by reason of the annoyances and dangers to which he
and his friends were exposed. Having undertaken to
establish a new plantation in the wilderness, his greater
responsibility would naturally produce a deeper serious-
ness. A member of his family testifies that " he seldom
used any recreations, but, being a great reader, all the
time he could spare from company and business, he
commonly spent in his beloved study." It would be an
error, however, to suppose that this seriousness had
with it no admixture of gayety ; for Hubbard, who was
partly his contemporary, describes him as "of such
pleasantness and fecundity of harmless wit as can
hardly be paralleled."
Residence in a new country also influenced social
life, but not as much as in many other cases of removal
to a wilderness. It has been said in modern time that
emigration tends to barbarism ; but this could not have
been true in their case, in any considerable degree.
From the first sabbath, they maintained the public
worship of God. Before the first year had passed,
their children were gathered into a school. Laws
were as diligently executed as anywhere in the world.
Every plantation had in it from the first some per-
sons of polite manners, to whom those of less culture
looked up with respect. The principal plantation was
a compact and populous town, and some of its inhabit-
ants were not only refined, but wealthy. The pecu-
liarity of their social state was not that they were
more barbarous than other Englishmen, but it consisted
374 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
rather in that mutual dependence and helpfulness usu-
ally to be found in a new country. News from home
was communicated to the neighbors. Letters of intel-
ligence, an institution which during the existence of
the colony began to give place to printed newspapers,
were passed from hand to hand.' Corn was husked
and houses were "raised** by neighborly kindness. The
whole plantation sympathized with a family afflicted
with sickness, and the neighbors assisted them in nurs-
ing and watching. Families entertained travellers after
the manner of Christians of the first centuries, and
highly prized their visits as seasons of fellowship, and
opportunities for learning the news of the day. The
train-band and the night watch were also peculiar
features of the social system incident to a plantation
in the wilderness. Comparing the social state in the
New Haven colony with that which now obtains on the
same territory, we find more manifestation of social in-
equality. This appears in the titles prefixed to names.
The name of a young man had no prefix till he became
a master workman. Then, if he were an artisan or a
husbandman, he might be addressed by the honorary
title of Goodman, and his wife might be called Good-
wife or Goody. A person who employed laborers but
did not labor with them was distinguished from one
whose prefix was Goodman, by the prefix Mr. This
term of respect was accorded to elders, magistrates,
teachers, merchants, and men of wealth, whether en-
gaged in merchandise, or living in retirement from
' Notice on page 419 what Mr. Davenport says of "the two Weekly
Intelligences." These were, I think, two numbers of a printed periodi-
cal.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE, 375
trade.' Social inequality was also strikingly manifest
in the " seating of the meeting-house," the governor
and deputy-governor being seated on the front form,
and allowed its whole length for the accommodation of
themselves and their guests, while others were disposed
behind them and in the end seats, according to social
position ; but a back seat of the same length as those
in front was considered sufficiently long for seven men.
The women on the other side of the house were ar-
ranged with the same consideration of rank. No seats
were assigned to persons inferior to a goodman and a
goodwife.
Although many of the people were much confined at
home during the week by domestic industry, all as-
sembled every Sunday for worship. In but few cases
was the attendance perfunctory. They went to the
house of God from a sense of duty, but they went with
a willing mind. They were interested, not only in the
worship and instruction of the church, but in the as-
sembly. Their social longings were gratified with the
announcement of intended marriages, with "bills" ask-
ing the prayers of the church for the sick, for the
recently bereaved, for those about to make a voyage to
Boston ; or with " bills " returning thanks for recovery
from a dangerous illness or for a safe return from a
journey or a voyage. Besides such personal items as
reached their 6ars by way of the pulpit, others came
to them in a more private way as they spoke with ac-
' In Massachusetts it was "ordered that Josias Plastowe shall, for
stealing four baskets of com from the Indians, return them eight baskets
ag?in, be fined. five pounds, and hereafter to be called by the name of
Josias and not Mr. as formerly he used to be.*'
3/6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
quaintances dwelling in a different quarter or at the
farms. It was a satisfaction to persons, who, during
the week, had seen only the inmates of their own houses
and a few neighbors, even to look on such an assembly.
Let the reader fancy himself entering the market-
place in New Haven town, while Stephen Metcalf and
Robert Bassett, "the common drummers for the town,"
are sounding the second drum on a Sunday morning.
The chimney-smoke rises not only from the habitations
of the town, but from as many sabbath-day houses as
there are families dwelling at the farms.' From every
direction families are approaching the square. The
limping Wigglesworth, whose lameness was afterward
so severe " that he is not able to come to the meeting,
and so is many times deprived of the ordinances,"
starting early from his house, (which was in Chapel
Street, near the intersection since made by High
Street,) is the first to enter the south door of the sanc-
tuary. Seeley, straight and stalwart in contrast with
this poor cripple, stands near, conversing with the mas-
' A sabbath-day house was a hut, in one end of which horses might
be sheltered, and in the other end was a room having a fireplace and
furnished, perhaps, with a bench, a few chairs, and a table. Here the
owners arrived soon after the first drum, and, if cold, kindled a fire. Here
they deposited their lunch, and any wraps which niight be superfluous in
the meeting-house. Hither they came to spend the intermission of wor-
ship. The writer remembers such houses in a country parish near New
Haven, where he visited when a child. In one of them he spent an inter-
mission, dividing his attention, when in the room devoted to the human
inmates, between doughnuts and the open fireplace with its rusty fire-dogs
and large bed- of live coals; but preferring the company of the pony
behind the chimney to that of the solemn people before the fire. He was
bom a little too late to remember sabbath-day houses in New Haven,
but his father has told him where this and that family had such accom-
modations.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE, Z77
ter of the watch, as the watchmen move away to patrol
the town. Following Wigglesworth comes " the right
worshipful Stephen Goodyear, Esquire,'* deputy-gover-
nor, and his neighbor, the reverend teacher of the
church, William Hooke,* afterward chaplain to Oliver
Cromwell, wearing gown and bands. On the east side
of the market-place, the pastor, also in gown and bands,
comes in solitary meditation through the passage which
the town had given him between Mr. Crane's lot and
Mr. Rowe's lot, "that he may go out of his own garden
to the meeting-house." His family, that they may not
intrude upon him in this holy hour, come through the
public street. Gov. Eaton, with his aged mother lean-
ing on his arm, walks up on the opposite side of the
same street, and crosses over from Mr. Perry's comer,
followed by his honored guests and the rest of his nu-
merous household. When all but a few tardy families
have reached the meeting-house, the drums cease to
beat. The squadron on duty for the day march in, and
seat themselves on the soldiers' seats near the east
door, which is "kept clear from women and children
sitting there, that if there be occasion for the soldiers
to go suddenly forth, they may have free passage."
Days of extraordinary humiliation were appointed by
the General Court from time to time in view of public
calamities or apprehended danger. On such days there
were two assemblies; and abstinence from labor and
amusements was required as on the Lord's Day, though
with less rigidness of interpretation, the prohibition
crystallizing in later times into the formula, " All servile
' Mr. Hooke had the lot which had been Zachariah Whitman's, at
the comer of Chapel and College Streets.
3/8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
labor and vain recreations on said day are by law forbid-
den." On Thanksgiving Day, as we learn from Daven-
port's letter to Winthrop, in which he mentions Gov.
Newman's sickness and death, there were also two ser-
vices in the meeting-house. Adding these occasional
assemblies to those of the Lord's Day, we find that the
whole population were often called together. But there
were, besides, convocations on lecture-days, occasional
church-meetings, and in the several neighborhoods " pri-
vate meetings wherein they that dwelt nearest together
gave their accounts one to another of God's gracious
work upon them, and prayed together, and conferred, to
their mutual edification." These private meetings were
held weekly, and in the day-time, as appears from a ques-
tion which Mr. Peck, the school-master, propounded to
the court, " whether the master shall have liberty to be
at neighbors' meetings once every week." Assemblies
for worship were certainly a very important feature in
social life.
Almost equally prominent were military trainings.
Soldiers were on duty every night. One-fourth of the
men subject to bear arms were paraded before the meet-
ing-house every Sunday, and were at frequent intervals
trained on a week-day. Six times in a year the whole
military force of the plantation was called out. A gen-
eral training brought together, not only those obliged to
train, but old men, women, and children, as spectators
of the military exercises, and of the athletic games
with which they were accompanied. Almost as many
people were in the market-place on training-day as on
Sunday, and those who came had greater opportunity
for social converse than on the day of worship. The
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 379
enjoyment which each experienced in watching the
manoeuvres of the soldiers, and the games of cudgel,
backsword, fencing, running, leaping, wrestling, stool-
bail, nine-pins, and quoits, was enhanced by sharing the
spectacle with the multitude, meeting old friends, and
making acquaintance with persons of congenial spirit.
Election-days were also occasions when the people
left their homes, and came together. The meeting of
a plantation court did not indeed bring out the wives
and daughters of the planters as a general training did ;
but when the annual election for the jurisdiction took
place, the pillion was fastened behind the saddle, and
the goodwif^ rode with her goodman to the seat of
government to truck some of the yam she had been
spinning, for ribbons and other foreign goods, as well
as to gather up the gossip of the year. On such occa-
sions a store of cake was provided beforehand, and
"election cake" is consequently one of the institutions
received from our forefathers.
For several years there were two fairs held annually
at the town of New Haven, one in May, and one in
September, for the sale of cattle and other merchandise.
These of course attracted people from all parts of the
jurisdiction.
In addition to these public assemblies of one kind
and another, there was daily intercourse between neigh-
bors. Women sometimes carried their wheels from one
house to another, that they might spin in company.
There were gatherings at weddings and at funerals.
There was neighborly assistance in nursing and watch-
ing the sick. There was, as has been already related,
social visiting in the evening after the Lord's Day.
380 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
There were house-raisings, when the neighbors assem-
bled to lift and put together the timbers of a new dwell-
ing ; and house-warmings, when, being again invited,
some months later, they came to rejoice with those who
had taken possession of a new dwelling. There were
huskings in the autumn when the maize had been
gathered and brought in ; but in the plantation of New
Haven single persons were not allowed to ** meet
together upon pretence of husking Indian com, out of
the family to which they belong, after nine of the clock
at night, unless the master or parent of such person or
persons be with them to prevent disorders at such
times, or some fit person intrusted to that end by the
said parent or master."
In view of the frequency with which the planters
were convened in greater or less companies, it is evi-
dent, that, however affected by their Puritanism and by
emigration to a wilderness, they were a social people.
They did not retire within themselves to live recluse from
human converse, but endeavored to purify their social
life. In this respect New Haven resembled the other
New England colonies, but, contrary to a somew^hat
prevalent opinion, did not go as far as the other colonies
in attempts to control social life by legislation.' " Mixt
dancing" was discountenanced, and, by construction,
forbidden, but there was no legal prohibition of dancing.
The General Court, referring in 1660 to some former
' Professor Kingslcy, in a note to his historical discourse, delivered on
the two hundredth anniversarj- of the settlement of New Haven, traces the
impression that there had been "blue laws" at New Haven as far back
as the year 1767, when Judge Smith of New York, having heard of such
a code, embraced the opportunity afforded by a visit to New Haven to
examine the early records of the colony. " A lie will travel round the
world while Truth is putting on her boots."
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 38 1
laws of a very general nature, designed to restrain idle
or evil living or miscarryings, declared in explanation : —
" Now that it may more clearly be understood what we judge to
be such miscarriages or misdemeanors amongst such persons, as
do thus tend to discourage God's work under our hands, and may
prove hurtful and hindersome to the profiting of our posterity ris-
ing, we do express that not only such night meetings unseason-
ably, but corrupt songs and foolish jesting or such like discourses,
wanton and lascivious carriages, mixt dancings, immoderate play-
ing at any sort of sports and games, or mere idle living out of an
honest calling industriously, or extravagant expenses by drinking,
apparel, and so forth, have all and every of them such a tendency."
Gaming by shufHe-board was prohibited, as was
shuffle-board at taverns, and by minors, but there was
no enactment against shuffle-board as such. Card-play-
ing was not forbidden, but the explanatory declaration
of the General Court cited above, was on one occasion
publicly read as a warning to Samuel Andrews, Good-
wife Spinage, and James Eaton, when, being summoned
before the Court, they were charged with allowing
young persons to play cards in their houses. Goodwife
Spinage said "that the scholars had played at cards
there [at her house] on the last days of the week and
on play-days in the afternoon, but in the evening, never."
Andrews " confessed he had done wrong, and professed
his hearty sorrow." Eaton "acknowledged that he
might have spent his time better, and if it were to do
again, he would not do it, being it is judged unlawful
and gives offence ; but for the thing itself, unless all
recreation be unlawful, he cannot see that what he hath
done is evil." The Court suspended judgment, " hoping
that this will be a warning to them to take heed of such
382 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
evil practices, and to improve their houses to better
purposes for time to come than herein they have done.
But as if Eaton had given less satisfaction than the
others, he was called again some three months after-
ward, when he declared unto the Court that he under-
stood that there were reports abroad of his miscarriage
in suffering some young persons to be at his house at
an unseasonable time, which report he acknowledged
to be true, and professed his hearty sorrow for it, and
his desire to see the evil of it more and more, and that
God would help him for tirne to come to keep a con-
science void of offence toward God and toward men." '
There were in New Haven no sumptuary laws, and,
so far as appears, there was, with the exception of the
explanatory declaration in 1660, no attempt to restrain
extravagance in apparel, either by legal enactment or
by the concentration of public opinion. In Massa-
chusetts, Winthrop writes, about six months after the
settlement at New Haven was begun, that "the Court,
taking into consideration the great disorder general
throughout the country in costliness of apparel and
' Some of the descendants of this James Eaton, or as his name is
more commonly written, James Heaton, claim that he was a son of The-
ophilus Eaton, jun., the younger son of Gov. P2aton, alleging that he gave
the name Theophilus to one of his sons, that the name has been repeated
in every generation since, and that their family still possess land in North
Haven, east of the Quinnipiac, which belonged to the governor. I can-
not find that the governor had any land east of the Quinnipiac, except at
Stony River. Any presumptive evidence afforded by the name Theophi-
lus disappears when we learn from the parish register of St. Stephen's
that Theophilus, son of Theophilus and Anne Eaton, was baptized March
II, 1631, and from the New Haven records that James Eaton took the
oath of fidelity April 4, 1654. Theophilus Eaton, jun., could not have
been eight years old when James Eaton was bom.
DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL LIFE. 383
following new fashions, sent for the elders of the
churches, and conferred with them about it, and laid
it upon them, as belonging to them, to redress it by
urging it upon the consciences of their people, which
they promised to do. But little was done about it ; for
divers of the elders' wives were in some measure part-
ners in this general disorder.'* Some years previously
there had been an order of the Court prompted by sim-
ilar feelings, and having a similar design. Afterward
there were in different years several orders designed to
restrain extravagance in apparel, especially "amongst
people of mean condition," one of them expressly pro-
viding that ** this law shall not extend to the restraint of
any magistrate or other public officer of this jurisdiction,
or any settled military officer, or soldier in time of mili-
tary service, or any other whose education and employ-
ments have been above the ordinary degree, or whose
estates have been considerable, though now decayed."
But nothing similar to this is found on the records of
New Haven. Some writer, noticing that both Plym-
outh and New Haven differed from Massachusetts in
that they did not attempt to regulate dress, says that
Plymouth was too poor, and New Haven too rich, for
such legislation. Perhaps, however. New Haven was
restrained from enacting sumptuary laws more by its
mercantile character than by its wealth. Its leading
men had been accustomed not only to wear rich cloth-
ing themselves, and to see it worn by others, but to
increase their estates by selling cloth to all comers who
were able to pay for it. Their feelings were conse-
quently different from those of a man like Winthrop,
who had never been a merchant, and had, like other
384 HISTORY OF KBW HAVEN COLOXY.
English country gentlemen, regarded rich apparel as a
prerogative of the gentry-.
As Gov, Eaton's wearing apparel was appraised after
his death at ;£so, it would seem that he could not
have favored sumptuary legislation consistently w-ith
his own habits, unless he did it in the aristocratic
spirit of the Massachusetts law. Considering how much
greater purchasing power there was then in fifty pounds
sterling than there is now, we must conclude that in his
dress, as well as in the furniture of his house, he
" maintained a port in some measure answerable to his
place."
CHAPTER XVII.
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT TO THE
RESTORATION OF THE STUARTS. .
WE have seen that the colony of New Haven, when
it entered into combination with Connecticut,
Plymouth, and Massachusetts, consisted of the planta-
tions at New Haven, Southold, and Stamford, and that
Guilford and Milford were shortly afterward received
as component parts of the jurisdiction. In the spring
of 1644 Totoket, or Branford, "a place fit for a small
plantation, betwixt New Haven and Guilford," was
sold to Mr. Swain and others of Wethersfield, upon
condition that they should join in one jurisdiction with
New Haven and the other plantations, upon "the funda-
mental agreement settled in October, 1643, which they,
duly considering, readily accepted." Southampton, on
Long Island, having placed itself under the jurisdic-
tion of Connecticut, a minority of the people, with their
minister, Mr. Abraham Pierson, preferring the theo-
cratic constitution of New Haven, removed to Branford
and united themselves with the company from Weth-
ersfield. From this time to its dissolution the juris-
diction consisted of the six plantations of New Haven,
Southold, Stamford,' Guilford, Milford, and Branford.
' Greenwich was regarded as a part of Stamford.
38s
386 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
In two important particulars New Haven differed
from the other colonies. It was part of its "funda-
mental law,'* as we have already seen, that only church-
members should be free-burgcsses or voters. By "fun-
damental " was meant unchangeable. In our day it
is generally allowed that a people have the right to
change the constitution of their government ; and most
written constitutions recognize their own mutability
by indicating the method in which a change may be
wrought. But the fundamental law established by the
planters of Quinnipiac on " the fourth day of the fourth
month, called June, 1639,*' ^^^ afterward assented to
by the other plantations constituting the jurisdiction
of New Haven, was designed to be unalterable. It
was understood to be a compact, or agreement, from
which those who had assented to it could not recede.
In the words of the colonial constitution, " it was agreed
and concluded as a fundamental order not to be dis-
puted or questioned hereafter, that none shall be ad-
mitted to be free burgesses in any of the plantations
within this jurisdiction for the future, but such planters
as are members of some or other of the approved
churches in New England." '
The second particular in which New Haven differed
from the other colonies was in the disuse of juries.
In the plantation courts, and in the courts of the juris-
diction, the judges determined all questions of fact, as
well as of law, and of discretionary punishment. It
has been thought by some that Gov. Eaton's residence
' In Massachusetts only church-members could be made freemen, till
the law was changed by command of King Charles the Second. But the
requirement of -church-membership -was not "a fundamental law.**
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 387
in the Baltic countries suggested this departure from
English law. But if suggested by any thing he had
seen in other lands, it was doubtless commended to
him and to others who acted with him in establishing
a new government, by its conformity to the institutions
of Moses.
The records give no evidence that the disuse of juries
occasioned any trouble; but Hubbard thus criticises this
peculiarity of New Haven : " Those who were employed
in laying the foundation of New Haven colony, though
famed for much wisdom, experience, and judgment, yet
did they not foresee all the inconveniency that might
arise from such a frame of government, so differing
from the other colonies in the constitution thereof,
manifest in their declining that prudent and equal tem-
perament of all interests in their administration of
justice, with them managed by the sole authority of the
rulers without the concurrence of a jury, the benefit
of which had been so long confirmed by the experience
of some ages in our own nation ; for where the whole
determining, as well both matter of fact as matter of
law, with the sentence and execution thereof, depends
on the sole authority of the judges, what can be more
done for the establishing of an arbitrary power .^"
Hubbard also testifies as follows concerning the lim-
itation of the right of suffrage : " There had been an
appearance of unquictness in the minds of sundry, upon
the account of enfranchisement and sundry civil privi-
leges thence flowing, which they thought too shortly
tethered up in the foundation of the government." His
testimony on this subject is confirmed by that of the
records, as will hereafter appear.
388 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
The colonial government, for ten years after its estab-
lishment, experienced no greater trials than the petty
injuries and insults from the Dutch already mentioned
in the chapters on industrial pursuits and military
affairs. But in 1653, England and Holland being at
war, the Dutch at Manhattan evinced greater hostility
than usual against their English neighbors. It was
believed throughout the colonies of Connecticut and
New Haven that they had plotted to form a general
conspiracy of Indians to massacre the English. Trum-
bull, who lived a century later, seems to have had entire
confidence in the testimony. He says, " Nine sachems,
who lived in the vicinity of the Dutch, sent their united
testimony to Stamford *that the Dutch governor had
solicited them, by promising them guns, powder, swords,
wampum, coats, and waistcoats, to cut off the English.'
The messengers who were sent declared *that they
were as the mouth of the nine sagamores, who all spake
they would not lie.* One of the nine sachems after-
ward came to Stamford with other Indians, and testi-
fied the same. The plot was confessed by a Wampeag
and a Narraganset Indian, and was confirmed by Indian
testimonies from all quarters. It was expected that a
Dutch fleet would arrive, and that the Dutch and
Indians would unite in the destruction of the English
plantations. It was rumored that the time for the
massacre was fixed upon the day of the public election,
when the freemen would be generally from home."
Connecticut and New Haven were naturally much
alarmed, and became clamorous for war. The commis-
sioners, after investigation, declared war by a vote of
seven to one. Mr. Bradstreet of Massachusetts voted
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 389
against the declaration, and the General Court of that
jurisdiction, being then in session, certified the com-
missioners that "they did not understand they' were
called to make a present war against the Dutch."
This action of the General Court expressed the gen-
eral sentiment of its* constituency. Less irritated
against the Dutch on account of previous injuries, and
less exposed to present danger, the people of Massa-
chusetts were less ready to believe that war was im-
peratively necessary and unquestionably just.
Not content with the communication they had made,
the General Court of Massachusetts proceeded to put
on record a declaration that the commissioners had no
power by the Articles of Agreement to determine the
justice of an offensive or vindictive war and to en-
gage the colonies therein. This declaration gave great
offence to the other colonies, particularly to Connecti-
cut and New Haven, where the spirit of war was most
rife : —
"At a general court held at New Haven for the jurisdiction
the 29th of June, 1653, the governor acquainted the Court with
what was done at the commission last at Boston, concerning the
war propounded against the Dutch, and particularly with an in-
terpretation of the General Court of the Massachusetts of the
Articles of Confederation, wherein they declare that the commis-
sioners have not power to. act so far in matters of that nature as
to make an offensive war. These writings were read; and the
interpretation was much disliked by the Court, knowing that if
it stood, the combination of the colonies must be broken, or made
useless.
** The governor also acquainted the Court with a late conference
which himself, Capt. Astwood, and Mr. Leete have had with the
magistrates and General Court of Connecticut jurisdiction, and
that they have agreed to send the mind of both the General Courts
390 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
to the Massachusetts concerning that interpretation (that from this
colony the Court desired the governor to draw up, which is here-
after entered^ and also again to desire aid and assistance from
them in this undertaking against the Dutch, according as the
commissioners had agreed, that is, five hundred men from all
the colonies, with suitable provisions for such a design; but if
that be not yielded, that then they would give leave that we use
some means whereby volunteers may be procured out of their
colony, with shipping, victuals, and ammunition, fit for that ser-
vice. And the better to further and accomplish it, it is agreed
that four persons shall be sent as agents or commissioners from
the two general courts; that is, two from Connecticut and two
from hence. Wherefore the Court did now choose and appoint
Mr. William Leete, one of the magistrates of this jurisdiction,
and Mr. Thomas Jordan, one of the deputies for the General
Court for Guilford, for this service, who are to have commission
and instructions from this Court to authorize and direct them to
act and negotiate in this business, and to give the commissioners
a call to sit here at New Haven the first or second Thursday in
August next, which answer to the Massachusetts declaration, and
the commissions and instructions are as followeth : —
" The Answer of this General Court to the Massachusetts
Declaration,
"Upon information of a question propounded by the honored
General Court of the Massachusetts concerning the power of
the commissioners to determine the justice of an offensive war
and the answer of the committee thereto, this Court hath con-
sidered and compared the Articles of Confederation and the inter-
pretation together, and desire they may, without offence, express
their thoughts and apprehensions in the case.
"The confederation betwixt the colonics was no rash and
sudden engagement ; it had been several years under considera-
tion. In anno 1638 there was a meeting at Cambridge about it,
but some things being then propounded inconvenient for the lesser
colonies, that conference ended without fruit, and the four juris-
dictions, though knit together in affections, stood, in reference one
to another, loose and free from any express covenant or combina-
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 39 1
tion, till, upon a new invitation and propositions from the Massa«
chusetts, another meeting was appointed at Boston, in May, 1643;
so that magistrates, deputies, and freemen, especially those of the
Massachusetts, had about five years' time to consider what they
were about, the compass and consequences of such a consociation,
and probably did improve it, and saw cause to renew the treaty so
long suspended.
" 2. After a large and serious debate of the committee chosen
and empowered by the several jurisdictions (the General Court for
the Massachusetts, then sitting at Boston, and being acquainted,
and from time to time advised with, concerning all and every article
treated of), the 19th of May, 1643, a firm agreement was made and
concluded, wherein the other jurisdictions, by their deputies, the
Massachusetts, both by their deputies, and by the General Court,
considering that we were all of one nation and religion, and all of
us came into these parts ot America with one and the same end
and aim« and could it have been done with conveniency, had com-
municated in one government and jurisdiction, thought it their
bounden duty, without further delay, to enter Into such a present
consociation as whereby the four jurisdictions might be, and con-
tinue, one, according to the tenor and true meaning of the Articles
of Agreement ; and that thenceforth they all be, and be called by
the name of, the United Colonies of New England.
" 3. Though all the plantations which already are, or hereafter
may be, duly settled within the limits of each of these four colo-
nies, are to be, and forever to remain, under the government of
the same, and each colony to have peculiar jurisdiction within
itself as an entire body, as expressed in the third and sixth
articles, yet till now that was never understood to cross or
abate the power of the commissioners in things proper to the
confederation. The colonies uniting did, for themselves and their
posterities, enter into a perpetual league of friendship and amity,
for offence and defence, mutual advice and succor, upon all just
occasions for the joint safety and welfare, as in the second article.
The charge of all just wars, whether offensive or defensive, to be
borne by the four colonies in their several proportions ; and the
advantage of all such wars (if God give a blessing) to be accord-
ingly divided, as in the fourth article ; and for the managing and
392 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
concluding all such affairs, by express agreement, eight commis-
sioners are to be chosen (all in church fellowship, and all to bring
full power from their several general courts), namely, two by and
out of each colony, to hear and examine, weigh and determine, all
affairs of war and peace, leagues, aids, charges, and numbers of
men for war, division of spoils, or whatever is gotten by conquest,
receiving of more confederates or plantations into combination
with any of these confederates, and all things of like nature which
are the proper concomitants or consequents of such a confedera-
tion foV amity, offence, or defence; and if these eight commis-
sioners, when they meet, agree not, any six of them agreeing have
power to settle and determine the business in question ; but if six
do not agree, then such propositions, with their reasons, to be sent
and referred to the four general courts, as in the sixth article.
They were also to endeavor to frame and establish agreements
and orders in general cases of a civil nature, wherein the planta-
tions are interested, for preserving peace among themselves, and
preventing (as much as may be) all occasions of war or differences
with others, as about the speedy passage of justice in each juris-
diction to all the confederates equally as to their own, as more
largely appears in th^ eighth article, so that certainly, and without
question, these four colonies have, by a perpetual covenant, invested
the commissioners with power suiting such a confederation, and
without it the combination must either break or prove useless.
"4. As questions and scruples may arise and grow about the
justice of an offensive war, so conscience may be exercised in a
defensive war, and concerning leagues and aids. Jehoshaphat, the
king of Judah, sinned, and was rebuked by two prophets, Jehu and
Eliezcr, for joining with and helping Ahab and Ahaziah, kings of
Israel. If, therefore, the General Court for the Massachusetts do
now conceive and interpret that the power given to tlie commis-
sioners (men of the same nation, of the same religion, members of
approved churches, who came into these parts for the same ends
and spiritual aims, and who had communicated in one and the same
government and jurisdiction, had not distance of place hindered)
in an offensive war is a contradiction and absurdity in policy, a
scandal to religion, a violation of fundamental law, a bondage, and
prostituting itself to strangers, and so forth, they may, at their
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT. 393
next meeting, upon the same or like grounds conclude against
leagues, aids, a defensive war, and other parts of trust and power
wherewith the commissioners by the articles are invested, and the
three other colonies or the general court for any one of them may
do the like ; but we fear in so doing we shall draw guilt upon our-
selves in violating a perpetual league, so deliberately and firmly
made, be covenant-breakers, and provoke God against us.
"5. It may be considered when a just war in ordinary cases
may be called offensive or vindictive. When God gave the land
of Canaan, their cities, vineyards, and so forth, to the children of
Israel, Israel was the staff or sword in God's hand, by his appoint-
ment to punish a rebellious people, the measure of whose sins was
then full ; but ordinarily and in reference to men, lawful wars are
to defend, recover, secure, or get satisfaction, in case of just
possessions or rights injuriously invaded, seized, or endangered by
others, with respect to persons, estates, or honors, when other
means will not serve: such a war was David's against the children
of Ammon (2 Sam. x.) ; and such, we conceive, was the late war
of England against Scotland, and their present war against the
Dutch.
" 6. Such leagues and confederations have been made and con-
tinued among other people and provinces, some in a subordination,
some in a consociation, upon some several articles and covenants,
wherein power hath been granted, and yet customs, privileges,
and parts of government reserved for the safety of the whole and
conveniency of the parts, as may appear in the different agree-
ments and settlements of the Netherland Provinces, and the con-
federations of the cantons of the Switzers.
" 7. We know of no fundamental law of these colonies violated
or impaired by the Articles of Confederation, as (till now, we con-
ceive) they have been clearly and fully understood by the whole
committee and by the General Court of the Massachusetts, whose
heads and hands were in the contriving and framing of them ; nor
is there any such delegating of others, especially of strangers, as
is intimated. The freemen of the colonies generally choose their
own respective commissioners, such as in whom they may confide,
and accordingly they are invested with power according to the
combination covenant, and for these ten years we have found the
394 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
blessing of God upon our uniting, and his presence and assistance
upon the meetings and conclusions of the commissioners.
" 8. According to the intent of the colonies and contrivers of
the confederation, hath been the practice in all former times. The
commissioners have met and treated with power only limited to
the articles. The Indians, French, and Dutch, have had recourse
to them in all matters of war, leagues, aids, and so forth, from
time to time ; but this most clearly appears in anno 1645, when the
meeting was at Boston, and the General Court for the Massachu-
setts had some agitations with the commissioners about an ofiFen-
sive war with the Narraganset Indians, if the war now propounded
against the Dutch may be called offensive. The General Court
would have sent a commission after the soldiers gone from Boston,
but not yet out of the jurisdiction, conceiving that if otherwise any
blood should be shed, the actors might be called to account for it.
It was answered that though it did belong to the authority of the
several jurisdictions (after the war and number of men was agreed
by the commissioners) to raise the men and provide means to
carry it on, yet the proceeding of the commissioners and the com-
mission given was as sufficient as if it had been done by the Gen-
eral Court; for.
First, It was a case of such urgent necessity as could not stay
the calling of a court or council.
Secondly, In the Articles of Confederation, power is given to
the commissioners to consult, order, and determine, all affairs of
war, and the word determine comprehends all acts of authority
belonging thereto.
Thirdly, The commissioners are the sole judges of the neces-
sity of the expedition.
Fourthly, The General Court have made their commissioners
their sole counsel for these affairs.
Fifthly, Their counsels could not have had their due effect,
except they had power to proceed in this case as they have done,
which were to make the commissioners' power and the main end
of their confederation to be frustrate, and that merely for observ-
ing a ceremony.
Sixthly, The commissioners having had the sole power to man-
age the war for number of men, time, place, and so forth, they only
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 395
know their own counsels and determinations, and therefore none
can grant commissioners to act according to these but themselves.
Seventhly, To send a new commission after them or any con-
firmation of that which they have, would cast blame upon the
commissioners, and weaken their power, as if they had proceeded
unwarrantably.
After much time spent in such agitations, the General Court of
the Massachusetts allowed the proceedings of the commissioners
for the matter, and further agreed that it did belong to the commis-
sioners only, to appoint one to have command in chief over all the
forces sent from the several colonies.
"9. In the uniting of these colonies, it was agreed and cov-
enanted that if any of the confederates shall hereafter break any
of these present articles, or be any other way injurious to any
one of the other jurisdictions, such breach of agreement or injury
shall be duly considered and ordered by the commissioners for the
other jurisdictions, that both peace and this present confederation
may be entirely preserved without violation, as in the eleventh
article. And it is a rule in law concerning legal acts, that all
expressions and sentences, though of a doubtful construction, be
understood for the confirming of them as far as rationally may be.
Then certainly in confederations and covenants, blood may not
be drawn out by forced interpretations contrary to clear words,
sentences, the scope and purpose of all the articles, and to the
practice of all time since, to nullify and infringe them.
" 10. The premises considered, we conceive the interpretation
made by the committee and approved both by the magistrates and
deputies of the General Court for the Massachusetts apparently
tends to the breaking of the league of confederation betwixt the
colonies ; and though, by an order of June 3d, 1653, they declare
they have no such intention, that satisfies no more than if a man
maimed and made forever useless should be told his life for a
time should be spared. This colony conceiveth (and is accord-
ingly affected) that it had been much better for them never to have
combined. They are more exposed to enemies and dangers now
than before, while that interpretation stands in force at the Massa-
chusetts. The commissioners from thence are like to be sent
with a limited commission, and no fruit can be expected from such
396 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
a meeting; all they can do is to look up to Him to whom all the
shields of the earth belong, and, in the second place, to seek advice
and help elsewhere."
" The commission and instructions of Mr. William Leete^ one
of the magistrates for New Haven jurisdiction^ and Mr. Thomas
Jordan^ one of the deputies for the General Court of the same
jurisdiction^ joined to two agents or commissioners of Connecti"
cut J sent as a committee to treat with the honorable colony of the
Massachusetts^ as hereunder is more particularly expressed.
"Whereas all the confederated colonies, but especially these
two smaller and more westerly jurisdictions, are in imminent dan-
ger of an invasion of war, both from the Dutch (if once they be
strengthened with forces, either from the Netherlands or else-
where) and from the Indians hired and engaged by the Dutch (as
by much Indian testimony is proved) to cut off the English, not
only of Hempstead, Middleborough, &c., within the Dutch limits,
who are threatened and exposed to ruin for their faithfulness
to the English nation and their countrymen in these parts, but
the plantations within the United Colonies ; you are to treat with
the governor, council, commissioners, and General Court of the
Massachusetts, or any of them, as you find or may procure oppor-
tunity, that, for the honor of the English nation, the peace and
safety of the English in all this part of America, — by war, if no
other means will serve, — the Dutch, at and about Manhatoes, who
have been and still are likely to prove, injurious and dangerous
neighbors, may be removed, and that (according to the commis-
sioners' late agreement at Boston) five hundred men may be speedily
raised .out of the four colonies in proportion then settled, and,
without delay, employed in this public service.
" But if the governor, council, commissioners, General Court,
&c., as above, think fit to increase that number (the Dutch being
now more strongly fortified), or upon other considerations much
importing the welfare of the whole confederation in these times of
exercise, these two colonies of Connecticut and New Haven do
jointly desire that without offence three magistrates of this juris-
diction may give a call, according to the fifth article in the Con-
federation, to the commissioners, to meet at New Haven, the fourth
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 397
or eleventh day of August next, all invested with full power from
their several jurisdictions according to the Articles of Confedera-
tion, without any other limits than have hitherto been used.
" The General Court have also, as you know, perused and con-
sidered the interpretation of the Articles of Confederation, made
by a committee at Boston, and approved both by magistrates and
deputies of the Massachusetts General Court, and by way of
answer, do now return their apprehensions enclosed in a letter to
the governor, deputy-governor, and commissioners of that colony,
which we herewith deliver to you, and you are to present it to
the governor, &c., that if God bless our and your endeavors^ the
late interpretation may be recalled, and the confederation settled
according to the first intendment, and the progress it hath had in
the hands of the commissioners hitherto with a blessing. We
commend you to Him who can prosper both your travel and occa-
sions, and rest.
''By the General Court for New Haven Colony,
" The 29th June, 1653.
"Francis Newman, Secretary^'*
^^ Further instructions for Mr, Leete and Mr, Jordany if they
cannot prevail in the former propositions,
" You are to propound and desire from the governor, &c., lib-
erty to strike up a drum, or in some other way to treat for the
raising of volunteers to assist these two colonies in an expedition
for their safety ; and, if leave be granted (for we would give no
offenceX you may speak with such military officers in whom you
may confide, for the better furtherance of the work.
"By the General Court for New Haven Colony,
•' The a9th June, 1653.
"Francis Newman, Secretary,^*
" Further instructions for Mr, William Leete and Mr, Thomas
yordan, if they cannot prevail in the former propositions,
" I. For the number, they may be two, three, or four hundred
men, provided that such agreements and conclusions may be
firmly settled in writing, that these two colonics may with con-
398 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
veniency send such a proportion of men as they may spare, that
they may have at least an equal share, both in power to order and
command in all affairs, and in the success and advantage of the
business in all respects, if Cod give a blessing ; but herein they
that by agreement stay with the stuff, or be ordered as a reserve
or an auxiliary army to guard the plantations, or to watch against
any invasions or assaults of the Indians upon the plantations, to
be reckoned as part of our number, and to share equally with the
rest; and herein due consideration be had of shipping for the
service, what great guns will be necessary, with suitable provis-
ion, with victuals, &c. ; and you will warily consider the quality
and disposition of the men with whom you treat, and their com-
pany they are like to bring, that they be such as with whom we
may join in the same way, both of church administration and civil
government ; we would be loath to bring Rhode Island or any of
that stamp or frame nearer to us.
"2. If ships should come from England, bringing such com-
missions as may suit the service propounded, while you are in
those parts, it is hereby left to your discretion to treat and con-
clude with them for the public good, according to the tenor of
your instructions, though we cannot prescribe all particulars.
"3. In case the governor, &c., should send an answer to all
propounded, in a letter sealed, neither treating nor acquainting
you with the contents, you may, in time and place convenient, avoid-
ing offence, open the letter, and consider what is written, that you
may the better proceed in any thing to be done by you according
to directions now given ; and if any letters come from England,
which you may rationally conceive concern public affairs, you are
to send them with all speed, though you hire a messenger. The
wise and good God assist you according to the weight of your
work. We rest
"By the General Court for New Haven Colony,
"June 29, 1653.
"Francis Newman, Secretary^''
These documents from the pen of Gov. Eaton will
perhaps acquaint the reader as well and as briefly as it
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 399
were possible to do it, with the nature of the con-
troversy which arose between New Haven and Massa-
chusetts. The errand of Leete and Jordan and their
associates from Connecticut produced no immediate
fruit, the governor and council of Massachusetts claim-
ing that they could do nothing in the vacation of the
General Court, but offering to assemble the court on
the thirtieth day of August, a few days before the next
meeting of the commissioners.
When the commissioners met in September, a com-
munication was received from the General Court of
Massachusetts to the intent that, having considered the
letters and papers from the General Courts of Connecti-
cut and New Haven, they thought it unjust to be placed
"under a dilemma either to act without satisfaction
against their light, or to be accounted covenant-break-
ers." After further correspondence, both parties re-
taining as firmly as ever their antagonistic position,
the commissioners determined to adjourn sine die, and
return without loss of time to their other occasions.
This would have been practically a dissolution of the
confederation. The General Court, learning that the
commissioners were about to disperse, manifested a
more conciliatory spirit, voting, "That by the Articles
of Confederation, so far as the determinations of the
commissioners are just, and according to God, the sev-
eral colonies are bound before God and man to act
accordingly, and that they sin and break covenant if
they do not ; but otherwise we judge we are not bound,
neither before God nor men."
In view of this communication, the commissioners
were so far pacified that they proceeded to business,
4CX) HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
"referring all further questions to the addresses the
Massachusetts shall please to make to the other Gen-
eral Courts." But the very first matter presented for
% their consideration renewed the old dispute. It was a
complaint that Ninigret had made a hostile raid upon
the Indians of Long Island, tributaries and friends of
thq English, in which two sachems and about thirty
other Indians were slain, and divers women taken cap-
tive. The commissioners immediately despatched mes-
sengers to bring Ninigret's answxr to this complaint.
Upon return of the messengers, bringing an insolent
reply from Ninigret, and reporting that he had allowed
his men to insult and threaten them, the commissioners
declared war against him, and determined to raise for
its prosecution an army of 250 men.
In reply to the requisition on Massachusetts for her
contingent of 166 soldiers, the commissioners received
the following paper : —
"In answer to a letter of the honored commissioners for raising
forces to make a present war against Ninigret ; the council for the
Massachusetts assembled at Boston, the 24th of September, 1653,
taking into their consideration the votes of the commissioners for
raising 250 men to make war upon Ninigret, and having perused
the grounds and reasons thereunto presented in their papers, do
not see sufficient grounds either from any obligation of the Eng-
lish towards the Long Islanders, or from the usage the messengers
received from the Indians, or from any other motive presented unto
our consideration, or from all of them ; and therefore dare not
to exercise our authority to levy force within our jurisdiction to
undertake a present war against the said Ninigret."
Upon receipt of this communication, the commis-
sioners protested that by this overt act "the Massa-
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 4OI
chusetts have actually broken their covenant." Re-
senting this imputation, the General Court of Massa-
chusetts addressed letters to the General Courts of
the other colonies, proposing that "a committee be
chosen by each jurisdiction to treat and agree upon
such explanation or reconciliation of the Articles of
Confederation as shall be consistent with our true
meaning, the nature of the confederacy, and the power
and authority of every government."
The General Court of New Haven, upon receipt of
this communication and the report which their commis-
sioners made of "the debate they had for ten days with
the Massachusetts General Court before they could sit
as commissioners, and after with what they did when
the commissioners sat," declared that they saw no
cause to choose any committee for the purpose men-
tioned.
" The Articles of Confederation in their judgment want neither
alteration nor explanation, and they are fully satisfied in them as
they are." ** What the commissioners of this colony did the Court
approved ; but considering what the Massachusetts General Court
and council have done, this Court all agreed, and cannot but declare
that they have broken their covenant with us in acting directly
contrary to the Articles of Confederation ; upon which considera-
tion this Court see themselves called to seek for help elsewhere,
and can conclude of no better way than to make their addresses to
the State of England."
The letter in which the Court communicated to the
General Court of Massachusetts the declarations thus
recorded, was, in the first place, sent to Hartford^ and,
being approved by the General Court of Connecticut,
was, by their direction, signed by the secretar}' of that
402 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
colony, as well as by the secretary of New Haven. The
General Court of Plymouth, some months afterward,
replied to Massachusetts in a communication of similar
import, but doubtless more pungent by reason of the
indisputable disinterestedness of that colony. They
say: —
" The unexpected and less welcome intelligence that we received
upon the return of our commissioners from their last and most un-
comfortable meeting hath administered just ground to us to let you
understand how sadly we resent, and how deeply we are aftected
with, that sad breach of the confederation, on your part acted,
especially at such a time as this, wherein our enemies may be occa-
sioned not only to insult over us, but also to reproach the name of
God and his ways which we profess : which, upon whose account
it will be charged, we leave to consideration, and pass on to express
our thoughts in answer to yours dated the 13th of September, 1653,
which, after due consideration, we conceive (reserving due respects
to yourselves dissenting) that the Articles of Confederation are so
full and plain that they occasion not any such queries for their full
explanation, or meeting of a committee for such a purpose, it seem-
ing unto us to be obvious to any impartial eye, that, by the said
articles, the commissioners are the representatives of the several
colonies, and therefore what they Jict and determine, according to
that power given them in such matters as are expressly included
in the said articles, may justly be interpreted as the sense, reason,
and determination of the several jurisdictions which have sub-
stituted them thereunto, and the several colonies may and ought to
acquiesce in as if themselves had done \V*
When the time for the next meeting of the commis-
sioners was near, the question was raised in the General
Court at New Haven, whether commissioners should be
chosen. The result of the debate is thus recorded : —
" The Court, having found such ill fruit from the Massachusetts,
of the two former meetings, are discouraged to send ; yet tli»it they
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT. 403
might show themselves followers of peace, and that they earnestly
desire to continue their confederation upon the terms it first began,
and for sundry years hath been carried on, did agree and choose
the governor and Francis Newman commissioners for the year
ensuing, and particularly for the next meeting at Hartford, if it
hold; and Mr. Leete and Mr. Goodyear are chosen to supply, if
the providence of God order it so that one or both of the others
should be hindered ; but with this direction from the Court, that if
the mind of the Massachusetts remain as they have formerly
declared, which hath made the other three colonies look upon the
confederation as broken by the Massachusetts, they conceive there
can be no fruit of their meeting, but only to consider the eleventh
article, and require such satisfaction from the delinquent cplony as
they shall judge meet."
No sooner had the commissioners assembled than
they " fell upon a debate of the late differences betwixt
the Massachusetts and the other colonies, in reference
to the government of the Massachusetts* declaration or
interpretation of the articles, bearing date June the 2d,
1653, and their not acting by raising of forces against
Ninigret in September last, according to the determina-
tion of the commissioners ; and, after some agitations
and writing about the same, the commissioners for the
Massachusetts presented the ensuing writing : — "
** To the intent all former differences and offences may be issued,
determined, and forgotten, betwixt the Massachusetts and the rest
of the confederate colonies, we do hereby profess it to be our
judgment, and do believe it to be the judgment of our General
Ceurt that the commissioners, or six of them, have power, accord-
ing to the articles, to determine the justice of all wars, &c. ; that
our General Court hath and doth recall that interpretation of the
articles which thev sent to the commissioners at Boston, dated the
2d of June, 1653, as it appears by that interpretation and conces-
sion of our Court presented to the commissioners in September
last, and do acknowledge themselves bound to execute the deter-
404 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
minations of the commissioners, according to the literal sense and
true meaning of the Articles of Confederation, so far as the said
determinations are in themselves just, and according to God."
Thus ended the open quarrel between Massachusetts
and the other colonies. But when the commissioners,
proceeding to make war upon Ninigret, gave the ap-
pointment of the commander-in-chief to Massachusetts,
Major Willard, their appointee, carried out the policy of
his colony almost as closely as if no army had been
sent. The commissioners censured him, but he doubt-
less felt assured that in his own colony his conduct was
approved. News of peace between England and Hol-
land having arrived before Massachusetts retracted her
offensive interpretation of the articles, the subject of
hostilities against the Dutch was no more agitated, and
gradually the United Colonies settled into tranquillity.
During this quarrel with Massachusetts, Connecticut
and New Haven had been vexed with internal dissen-
sion. As these colonies had been more clamorous for
war than those more remote from the Dutch, so the
zeal of those plantations in these colonies which were
most exposed to danger exceeded that of others. The
people of Stamford and Fairfield were not only ready
to engage in the fight with such forces as Connecticut
and New Haven might be able to raise, but were en-
raged because the authorities of their respective colo-
nies were not as rash as themselves. Trumbull says,
"The town of Fairfield held a meeting on the subject,
and determined to prosecute the war. They appointed
Mr. Ludlow commander-in-chief. He was the centre of
the evidence against the Dutch ; had been one of the
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 4OS
commissioners at the several meetings relative to the
affair ; had been zealous and active for the war ; and,
conceiving himself and the town in imminent danger
unless the Dutch could be removed from the neighbor-
hood, too hastily accepted the appointment/* But, as
Fairfield belonged to Connecticut, it is not our task to
relate what took place at Fairfield, nor what happened
in consequence to Mr. Ludlow. Stamford, in the New
Haven colony, wrote to the colonial authorities, " stir-
ring up to raise volunteers to go against the Dutch, and
that themselves will send forth ten men well furnished
for the war." The governor communicated this letter
to the General Court, Nov. 22, 1653, and, at the same
time a letter from Mr. Ludlow, giving information of
the action taken by Fairfield ; and an anonymous letter
to Robert Bassett of Stamford, " which is to stir up to
stand for the State of England, as they pretend, and
to stand for their liberties, that they may all have their
votes, and shake off the yoke of government they have
been under in this jurisdiction." These writings having
been read : —
** The Court considered whether they are called at this time to
send forth men against the Dutch, and after much debate and con-
sultation had with most of the elders in the jurisdiction, the issue
was, which the Court by vote declared, that, considering the hazards
and dangers attending such a design, especially now, it being so
near winter, and the want of suitable vessels, and the like, they
see not themselves called to vote for a present war, but to suspend
a full issue till Connecticut jurisdiction be acquainted with it, and
give notice what they will do ; but if they agree to carry it on now,
then this Court agrees to join with them, and to meet again to con-
sider and order, as the case may require."
r
406 HISTORY OF KEW HAVEN COLONY,
At the same court two magistrates who had been
sent to Stamford "to settle a right understanding of
things for the better quieting of their spirits who are
in a mutinous way," reported that they found the
people " for the most part full of discontent with the
present government they are under, pleading that they
might have their free votes in the choice of civil
officers, making objection against their rates, and pro-
pounded to have their charges of watching and ward-
ing the summer past, with some works about their
meeting-house for their defence, borne by the jurisdic-
tion, and that they might have twelve men sent them
at the jurisdiction charge to lie there all winter for
their defence, with some other things ; and after much
debate with them to quiet them, which did little prevail
with them, an order from the committee of Parliament
in England sent to this colony was read to them,
requiring them to submit to the government they are
under, which did somewhat allay their spirits for the
present, and they desired further time to consider of
things, and they would in some short timp send their
mind to the governor in writing.*'
A similar spirit of discontent prevailed at Southold,
which was liable to be attacked by Ninigret, transport-
ing his men across the Sound in canoes. John Youngs,
a son of the pastor, was the leader of the disaffected at
Southold, and was in communication with Robert Bas-
set, the boldest and most active of the disaffected at
Stamford. Youngs, Basset, and three other inhabitants
of Stamford, were put under bonds "to attend their
oath of fidelity to the jurisdiction, maintain the laws
here established, and not disturb the peace of the
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT, 407
colony, or of any plantation therein." Each made a
separate confession.
" Concerning John Youngs, he did now acknowledge that he
hath miscarried many ways, speaking rash and foolish words, and
such as have tended to sedition, was unsatisfied that he had not
his vote in choosing military officers, and that such he would not
follow as he did not choose. He is sorry he hath given such just
offence, and hopes he shall take warning, and walk to better satis-
faction hereafter." "Robert Basset said, concerning that letter
he received without a nanvs subscribed, he did not do as he ought
in so weighty a business, not considering of it, nor seeing that in
it which he since sees; but something being in it which suited his
present affection against the Dutch, and his corrupt opinion con-
cerning the votes, whereby his eyes were then blinded, he is
heartily sorry for it, and if God had not stopped him, for aught he
knows, it might have wrought great disturbance ; and for his dis-
turbing the peace of the colony, and opposing the ways of govern-
ment, he sees his evil in it in some measure, and hopes he shall
see it more, for he is convinced that the way of government here
settled is according to God, which he hath not honored as he
ought, and had he honored God; he would have helped him to
honor the government, which he did not, and is heartily sorr}- for
it. Concerning the uncomfortable words in the town meetings at
Stamford which have tended much to disturb the peace of that
place, and much grieve the hearts of God's people, which doth
now cause sorrow of heart in him, he hopes, that, as he hath been
an instrument of dishonor to God in that place, so he desires to
be an instrument of his honor there. Concerning the letter which
he carried from Stamford, wherein he was employed by the town,
at that time he apprehended it for the peace of the place, but he
now sees that he did not then see the bottom of it, for it did tend
to dishonor the government here, and prefer another government
before it : these and other his miscarriages he said he was sorry
for, and desires the Court to be merciful to him, hoping he shall
be watchful hereafter ; and added that he looks upon this as an
aggravation of his sin, that all this was against his oath of fidelity,
and from the great pride of his spirit."
408 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Mr. Youngs soon recovered the confidence of the
magistrates and other loyal people. The next year
after his submission he appeared in company with
Capt. Tappan of Southampton before the commission-
ers, in behalf of the English on the east end of Long
Island, and their Indian allies in the neighborhood,
petitioning for aid against Ninigret's hostile invasions.
At the suggestion of these gentlemen, seconded by
letters from some of the chief men of that neighbor-
hood, the commissioners ordered " a vessel sufficiently
manned and armed, as the case may require, to attend
Ninigret*s motions and, as much as may be, hinder his
intrusions upon the Island." Of this vessel Youngs
was appointed commander, with instructions to " take
in from Saybrook or New London, six, ten, or twelve
men, well armed and fitted for the service, as any of
the magistrates of Connecticut shall direct ; with which
force you shall improve your best endeavors to disturb
his passage to, and prevent his landing upon, Long
Island, by taking, sinking, and destroying so many
of his canoes employed in that service as shall come
within your power." In later years Youngs became
a freeman, and appears on the records as Capt. John
Youngs. It is doubtful, however, whether he was evfer
in his true inwardness reconciled to the fundamental
law of New Haven ; for, after the arrival of the Con-
necticut charter, he took the earliest opportunity of
transferring to Connecticut the allegiance of himself
and of Southold. After the absorption of New Haven
into Connecticut, he "became the most prominent
man of the town " of Southold, and was honored with
important trusts under the colonial government.
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT, 409
The vexed question of war with the Dutch brought
to open expression a dissatisfaction in the New Haven
colony, which, though latent at other times, was real
and wide-spread. Those who were not voters felt that
suffrage was too much restricted by the fundamental
law. The dissatisfaction was deepest in regard to the
choice of military officers. It often happened that
there was in the train-band a man plainly more fit to
be its commander than any of those who were church-
members. But however great a man's military genius
might be, he could neither be an officer, nor have any
voice in determining who should .give the word of
command, unless he was a member of some approved
church. This was the grievance of John Youngs, in
whose plantation there seems to have been a remarka-
ble scarcity of military capacity among the church-
members. The records disclose, however, similar cases
of dissatisfaction in other plantations. In 1655 the
General Court so far yielded to the influence of public
opinion as to record : —
'* It is agreed, that if in any plantation in this jurisdiction there
be none among the freemen fit for a chief military officer, it shall
be in the power of the General Court to choose some other man, as
they shall judge fit, in whom they may confide."
One instance of manifested dissatisfaction should be
specially mentioned in order to exhibit also the protest
of the General Court against it. In 166 1, at the first
court held under the administration of Gov. Leete,
John Benham acknowledged that he had circulated an
offensive writing, and desired forgiveness.
410 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
"The Court was willing to accept his acknowledgment, pro-
vided that they heard not further against him. Upon this the
Court saw cause to declare as followeth ; viz., That whereas we
have been occasioned (upon some reports of grievance from sun-
dry non-freemen, that just privileges and liberties are denied them,
which they apprehend are allowed them by our first fundamental
law) to take the matter into consideration, and upon a serious
review of things of this nature, and of our law, we do see cause to
declare unto all godly and peaceable inhabitants of this colony
that we are grieved to hear of some uncomfortable manner of
acting by such unsatisfied persons in a seeming factious, if not
seditious manner, which we wish all (who would not be looked
upon as disturbers of our peace and troublers of our Israel) to be
warned from after appearings in such wise ; and we hope they
shall have no cause to complain of any injury by our withholding
of just rights, privileges, or liberties, from any to whom they
belong, so as to hurt the promotion of our chief ends and inter-
ests, professed and pretended by all at our coming, combining, and
settling in New ERgland, as by the Articles of Confederation and
othenvise may be made to appear, which must engage us to seek,
secure, and advance the same by law, and from which we cannot
be persuaded to divert, so as to commit our more weighty civil or
military trusts into the hands of either a crafty Ahithophel or a
bloody Joab (as some abusive meddlers do seem to hint unto us, in
a paper we met withal), though such should seem to be better
accomplished with either natural or acquired abilities above those
that are as well lawful as intitled freemen ; whose earnest desire is
that all planters would make it their serious endeavor to come in
by the door to enjoy all privileges and bear all burdens equal with
themselves, according to our foundation settlements and univer-
sally professed ends, and that there may be no disorderly or
uncomely attempts to climb up another way, or to discourage the
hearts or weaken the hands of such as yet bear the burden of the
day in public trusts, which will be afflicting and hurtful to the ends
aforesaid."
Although this last manifestation of discontent oc-
curred twelve months later than the end of the period
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT. 4II
to be covered by this chapter, it seems appropriate to
connect it with earlier manifestations, so as to complete
what should be said of that " unquietness in the minds
of sundry upon the account of enfranchisement, and
sundry civil privileges thence flowing, which they
thought too shortly tethered up in the foundation of
the government."
The restoration of peace with the Dutch brought
internal quiet to New Haven ; the discontent with
restricted suffrage subsiding into its usual latent condi-
tion. The reconciliation with Massachusetts, begun in
the autumn of 1654, after her commissioners in her name
had retracted her offensive interpretation of the Arti-
cles, was completed in the spring of 1655, when Gov.
Eaton informed the General Court of New Haven " that
he hath received from the General Court of the Massa-
chusetts an order, whereby they confirm what their
commissioners did last year at Hartford, in recalling
their interpretation of the Articles of Confederation, so
offensive to the other colonies, which order is by this
Court accepted and appointed to be entered next after
the conclusions of the commissioners at that meeting."
In 1655 Gov. Eaton presented to the General Court
a digest of the laws of the colony, which he had been
requested to prepare. The Court approved of what he
had done, but desired him " to send for one of the new
books of laws in the Massachusetts colony, and to view
over a small book of laws newly come from England,
which is said to be Mr. Cotton's, and to add to what is
already done as he shall think fit, and then the Court
will meet again to confirm them, but in the mean time
(when they are finished) they desire the elders of the
412 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
jurisdiction may have the sight of them for their appro-
bation also." A few months later, "the laws which at
the Court's desire have been drawn up by the governor,
viewed and considered by the elders of the jurisdiction,
were now read and seriously weighed by this Court, and
by vote concluded and ordered to be sent to England
to be printed, with such oaths, forms, and precedents as
the governor may think meet to put in ; and the gov-
ernor is desired to write to Mr. Hopkins, and Mr. New-
man to his brother, to do the best they can to get five
hundred of them printed." Ten months after this
order for printing was made : —
" The governor informed the court that there is sent over now
in Mr. Garret's ship five hundred law-books, which Mr. Hopkins
hath gotten printed, and six paper books for records for the juris-
diction ; with a seal for the colony, which he desires them to accept
as a token of his love. The law-books cost, printing and paper,
;{^io.io; the six paper books ^2.8. The law-books are now
ordered to be divided as followeth : New Haven, 200 ; Milford, 80 ;
Guilford, 60 ; Stamford, 70, a part of which for Greenwich ; South-
old, 50 ; Branford, 40. For every of which books, each plantation
is to pay t\velve pence in good country pay (wheat and pease were
propounded) to the governor, Mr. Hopkins having ordered him to
receive it here upon his own account, and therefore it must be
made up in quantity, else he would be a great loser by it."
Greenwich, though nominally purchased and estab-
lished as a plantation by authority of the colony of New
Haven, had always been a wayward daughter. The
inhabitants soon revolted, and placed themselves under
the government of the New Netherlands ; but the
Dutch, being remonstrated with, relinquished their
claim. In 1665, —
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT. 413
" The deputies of Stamford propounded that they have and
do still suffer great inconvenience and damage by Greenwich,
who pound their cattle off the common, besides their disorderly
walking among themselves, admitting of drunkenness among the
English and Indians, whereby they are apt to do mischief, both to
themselves and others; they receive disorderly children or ser-
vants, who fly from their parents* or masters' lawful correction ;
they marry persons in a disorderly way, besides other miscarriages ;
and therefore, if the Court see meet, they desire some course may
be taken to reduce them to join with Stamford in this jurisdiction,
and the rather because they pretend to shelter themselves under
the commonwealth of England, who, we are confident, will not
approve of such carriages. The Court considered of the several
particulars, and remembered how Greenwich at first was by Mr.
Robert Feak, the first purchaser of the said lands, freely put under
this jurisdiction ; though after Capt. Patrick did injuriously put
himself and it under the Dutch, yet after, it was by agreement at
Hartford with the Dutch governor, 1650, to be resigned to New
Haven jurisdiction again, and since we hear that the Dutch do
exercise no authority over them ; all which, being considered, the
Court did agree and order that a letter should be written to them
from this court, and sent by the deputies of Stamford, requiring
them, according to the justice of the case, to submit themselves
to this jurisdiction, which, if they refuse, then the Court must
consider of some other way."
After more than a year of resistance, the people of
Greenwich signed the following engagement : —
"At Greenwich, the 6th of October, 1656. We, the inhabitants
of Greenwich, whose names are underwritten, do from this day
forward freely yield ourselves, place, and estate, to the government
of New Haven, subjecting ourselves to the order and dispose of
that general court, both in respect of relation and government,
promising to yield due subjection unto the lawful authority and
wholesome laws of the jurisdiction aforesaid, to wit, of New
Haven." The Court, receiving this written engagement, ordered
that " they are to fall in with Stamford, and be accepted a part
414 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
thereof, and, from the time of their submission, they are freed
from rates for one whole year."
The submission of Greenwich, signed in the next pre-
ceding October, was presented to the court May 27,
1657. This was the last general court in which Eaton
presided, and only twice afterward did he hold a court of
magistrates. He died suddenly in the following Jan-
uary. " Having worshipped God with his family after
his usual manner, and upon some occasion with much
solemnity charged all the family to carry it well unto
their mistress who was now confined by sickness, he
supped, and then took a turn or two abroad for his
meditations. After that, he came in to bid his wife
good night, before he left her with her watchers ;
which, when he did, she said, 'Methinks you look sad.*
Whereto he replied, * The differences risen in the church
of Hartford make me so.' She then added, 'Let us
even go back to our native country again.* To which
he answered, 'You may, but I shall die here.* This
was the last word that ever she heard him speak ; for,
now retiring unto his lodging in another chamber, he
was overheard about midnight fetching a groan ; and
unto one sent in presently to inquire how he did, he
answered the inquiry with only saying, 'Very ill,* and,
without saying any more, he fell asleep in Jesus.**
"This man,** says Hubbard, "ha(i in him great gifts
and as many excellencies as are usually found in any
one man. He had an excellent princely face and port,
commanding respect from all others ; he was a good
scholar, a traveller, a great reader, of an exceeding
steady and even spirit, not easily moved to passion, and
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 415
Standing unshaken in his principles when once fixed
upon, of a profound judgment, full of majesty and
authority in his judicatures so that it was a vain thing
to offer to brave him out."
As Eaton had been elected to the chief magistracy
annually from the institution of the colonial govern-
ment, so Stephen Goodyear had been with equal regu-
larity chosen deputy-governor. Naturally he would
have succeeded to the place vacated by the death . of
Eaton ; but his absence on a visit to England obliged
the freemen to look elsewhere for a chief magistrate.
At the court of election in the following May, Francis
Newman, who had for some years been secretary of
the jurisdiction, was chosen governor, and William
Leete, deputy-governor. Mr. Davenport writes to his
friend the younger Winthrop : —
" The last election day was the saddest to me that ever I saw
in New Haven, by our want of him whose presence was wont to
make it a day of no less contentment than solemnity. Being weary
after my sermon, I was absent from the court. The first news
that I heard from thence added to my sorrow, for I heard that
Mr. Goodyear was wholly left out in the choice of magistrates;
whereas I had been secure, thinking they purposed to choose him
governor. But the day following, upon inquiry into the cause of
it, I received such answer as cleared unto me that it came to
pass, not by any plot of men, but by the overruling providence of
God. For the proxies generally voted for Mr. Goodyear to be
governor and Mr. Leete deputy, and none of them gave their votes
for Mr. Goodyear to be deputy-governor if the former failed, nor
to be magistrate, but put in blanks to both, taking it for granted
that he would be chosen governor. But before they proceeded
to election, some of the deputies of the court propounded and
urged the necessity of great expediency, in respect of our condition
at present, of having the governor present among us. Hereunto
4l6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
the freemen generally consented ; and hereby the election fell
upon Mr. Newman to be governor, and Mr. Leete deputy-gov-
ernor, for this year. To this latter the proxies for the most part
concurred, and most of the present freemen. The votes of the
present freemen and some few proxies carried the election for gov-
ernor to Mr. Newman by plurality of votes, which he strongly
refused; but importunity of many in the court at last overcame
him to accept it ; and some of Mr. Goodyear's friends spake ear-
nestly, when these two were chosen, to hinder his being chosen to
magistracy, alleging such reasons as they had." .
Mr. Goodyear was so generally regarded as second
only to Gov. Eaton in all qualifications requisite for the
chief magistracy, that, if he had lived to return, he
would probably have been called, as soon as an election
occurred, to the high position for which his only dis-
qualification in May, i^fjTwas absence from the col- /658
ony. His death occurred in London, not long after-
ward ; the melancholy tidings of it having been received
before the 20th of October, at which date proceedings
were commenced for the settlement of his estate.
Mr. Newman and Mr. Leete were re-elected in 1659
and 1660. On the 17th of October of the latter year
a court of magistrates was held, at which the following
record was made, the governor being absent : —
" By reason of the afflicting hand of God on New Haven by
much sickness, the Court could not pitch upon a day for public
thanksgiving through the colony for the mercies of the year past,
and did therefore leave it to the elders of the church at New
Haven, as God may be pleased to remove his hand from the gov-
ernor and others, to give notice to the rest of the plantations what
day they judge fit for that duty, that we may give thanks and re-
joice before the Lord together."
HISTORY OF THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT 417
Gov. Newman died Nov. 18, 1660. Mr. Davenport,
in a letter to his friend Winthrop, thus communicates
the particulars of his decease : —
" We hoped he was in a good way of recovery from his former
sickness, and were comforted with his presence in the assembly
two Lord's days, and at one meeting of the church on a week day,
without sensible inconvenience. And on the morning of the day
of public thanksgiving, he found himself encouraged to come to
the public assembly. But after the morning sermon he told me
that he found himself exceedingly cold from head to toe ; yet
having dined, he was refreshed, and came to the meeting again in
the afternoon, the day continuing very cold. That night he was
very ill ; yet he did not complain of any relapse into his former
disease, but of inward cold, which he and we hoped might be
removed by his keeping warm and using other suitable means. I
believe he did not think that the time of his departure was so
near, or that he should die of this distemper, though he was always
prepared for his great change. The last day of the week he
desired my son to come to him the next morning to write a bill for
him to be prayed for, according to his direction. My son went to
him after the beating of the first drum ; but finding himself not fit
to speak much, he prayed him to write for him what he thought
fit. When the second drum beat, I was sent for to him. But
before I came, though I made haste, his precious immortal soul
was departed from its house of clay unto the souls of just men
made perfect. We were not worthy of him, a true Nathanael, an
Israelite indeed, who served God in Christ in sincerity and truth.
He honored God in his personal conversation, and in his adminis-
tration of chief magistracy in this colony ; and God hath given
him honor in the hearts of his people.*'
On the 27th of July, 1660, about four months pre-
vious to the death of Gov. Newman, the ship Prudent
Mary, commanded by Capt. Pierce, a noted shipmas-
ter in the trade between New England and the mother
4l8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
country, arrived at Boston, bringing intelligence that
the Stuarts had been restored to the throne in the
person of Charles II. In the vessel which brought
these tidings came Edward Whalley and William Gofife,
both members of the High Court which had con-
demned to death the father of the reigning monarch.
CHAPTER XVIII.
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES.
THE tidings which came to Boston on the 27th
of July, 1660, were not entirely unexpected. A
new parliament had been summoned to meet in April ;
and the result of the elections had shown that it was
to consist chiefly of persons friendly to a government
by king, lords, and commons. So much as this must
have been already known in New England by earlier
ships than that of Mr. Pierce. His arrival was anx-
iously expected. Mr. Davenport writes to Winthrop
just one week before Pierce cast anchor at Boston,
" Sir, I humbly thank you for the intelligences I received
in your letters, and for the two weekly intelligences
which Brother Miles brought me, I think from your-
self, and which I return enclosed, by this bearer, with
many thanks. I did hope that we might have received
our letters by Capt. Pierce before this time. But we
have no news lately from the Bay. Brother Rutherford
and Brother Alsop are both there, so also is our teacher
Mr. Street. The two former, I hope, will return next
week. Then, probably, we shall have some further
news. The Lord fit us to receive it as we ought, what-
ever it may be.**
The restoration of the Stuarts was not received in
4«9
420 HISTORY OF XEW HA VEX COLOXV,
New England jo)'fully. The change from a kingdom
to a commonwealth twenty years before had injured
New England in its material interests by checking the
emigration which was pouring into it population and
wealth. But this disadvantage had been outweighed,
in the judgment of the Puritan colonists, by the eleva-
tion of men in sympathy with themselves to supreme
power and authority in what they called the State
of England. They were more earnest to secure " the
ends for which they had come hither " than to obtain
a larger price for their corn and cattle, and they were
confident that these ends would not be frustrated by
any action of the home government so long as Puritans
were in power in England. But what effect upon the
colonies the restoration of the Stuarts might produce,
it was impossible to foresee.
When the time arrived for the ne.xt election in New
Haven jurisdiction, it was difficult to find suitable per-
sons willing to accept office. John Wakeman and
William Gibbard were nominated for the magistracy in
the plantation court of New Haven, notwithstanding
their protest ; Mr. Wakeman, who had had some
thought of removing to Hartford, saying, when ques-
tioned if he intended to stay at New Haven, that " he
was not resolved whether to go or stay, but rather than
he would accept of the place, he would remove.** In
the court of elections for the jurisdiction they were
both elected magistrates, "but neither of them took
the oath." Mr. Benjamin Fenn of Milford being elected
magistrate, took the oath ** with this explanation before
the oath was administered, that he would take the oath
to act in his place, according to the laws of this juris-
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 42 1
diction ; but in case any business from without should
present, he conceived he should give no ofifence if he
did not attend to it, who desired that it might be so
understood." Mr. William Leete was chosen governor,
Mr. Matthew Gilbert deputy-governor, and Mr. Robert
Treat and Mr. Jasper Crane, magistrates. It does not
appear that any of these four hesitated to take the oath
proper to their place.
By the terms of his restoration, Charles II. had left
to Parliament to determine who should be excepted
from an act of general amnesty. The act, when passed,
excepted all who had been directly concerned in the
death of the former king. But because Whallcy and
Goffe had left England before they had been marked
for punishment, the people of Massachusetts felt no
embarrassment in receiving and entertaining them.
Major Daniel Gookin, one of their fellow-passengers
in the Prudent Mary, offered them the hospitality of
his house in Cambridge; and in Cambridge they re-
mained till the following February, often visiting Bos-
ton and other towns in the neighborhood. They came,
it is said, under the assumed names of Edward Rich-
ardson and William Stephenson ; but their secret, not-
withstanding this disguise, was known to many ; so
that when intelligence came that they had been ex-
cepted in the act of amnesty, some of the magistrates
were alarmed, and the more because it was known that
they had been seen and recognized by Capt. Thomas
Breedon, a royalist who had since sailed for England.
The governor therefore convened his council to consider
and determine whether the proscribed regicides should
be apprehended. The council considered, but came to
422 HISTORY OF NEW HA VEX COLOXY,
no determination. Four days afterward Whalley and
Goffe relieved their friends in Massachusetts by depart-
ing for New Haven.
Only a fortnight after their arrival at Boston, Mr.
Davenport had mentioned them in a letter to the
younger Winthrop, and declared his purpose of inviting
them to his house after the meeting of the commis-
sioners in September, alleging, as a reason for delay, his
desire to keep the guest-chamber ready for an expected
visit from Mr. and Mrs. Winthrop during the meeting
of the commissioners. His interest in them at that
time seems to have been that of a person in sympathy
with them in politics and religion, who had heard a
good report of their quality and godliness, but was
unacquainted with their personal history and connec-
tions. On a little piece of paper wafered to the side
of the letter, he adds this postscript : " Sir, I mistook,
in my letter, when I said Col. Whalley was one of the
gentlemen, &c. It is Commissar}'-Gen. Whalley, sis-
ter Hooke's brother, and his son-in-law who is with
him is Col. Goffe ; both godly men, and escaped pur-
suit in England narrowly." He had doubtless received
this information from Mr. William Jones and his wife,*
* William Jones, having married as his second wife Hannah, youngest
daughter of Theophilus Eaton, July 4, 1659, came in the following year
from London to New Haven, where, on the 23d of May, 1662, he took
the oath of fidelity with the following qualification: ** That whereas the
king hath been proclaimed in this colony to be our sovereign, and we his
loyal subjects, I do take the said oath with subordination to his majesty,
hoping his majesty will confirm the said government for the advancement
of Christ's gospel, kingdom, and ends, in this colony, upon the founda-
tions already laid ; but in case of the alteration of the government in the
fundamentals thereof, then to be free from the said oath." The same day
he was admitted a freeman ; and five days afterward, at a court of election
for the jurisdiction, he was chosen a magistrate.
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 423
who, having crossed the Atlantic in the ship with
these distinguished strangers, had come to New Haven
to occupy the mansion which Mrs. Jones, the daughter
of Gov. Eaton, had inherited from her father. The
identification of Whalley as Mrs. Hooke's brother must
in time have recalled to memory many things he had
learned from his colleague in reference to Goffe, who
was the husband of Mrs. Hooke's niece. If he had
not already heard that the latter, when a major-general
in the army, with his headquarters at 'Winchester, had
resided in the family of Mr. Whitfield, formerly pastor
of the church in Guilford, he may have learned it from
the same persons who had assisted him to identify the
brother-in-law of his former colleague.
The greater ease of escaping from New Haven into
New Netherlands, may have influenced Whalley and
Goffe to go thither rather than remain in Hartford,
where they tarried awhile, and were hospitably enter-
tained by Gov. Winthrop. But the presence at New
Haven of persons intimately acquainted with the friends
in England on whom they were dependent for remit-
tances of money, may also have had some weight in
their minds in determining where to hide themselves.
A journey of nine days from Cambridge brought
them by way of Hartford and Guilford to New Haven,
March 7, 1661, where they appeared openly as Mr.
Davenport/s guests. But intelligence having reached
Boston, while they were on their journey, that a royal
proclamation for their arrest had been issued in Janu-
ary, on information supplied by Capt. Breedon, it soon
followed them to New Haven, and rendered it unsafe
for them to be seen in public. Accordingly, on the
424 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
27th of March, they went to Milford, as if on a journey
to New Netherlands ; but in the night they returned
to Mr. Davenport's, where they remained in conceal-
ment till the 30th of April.
Further reports of their residence at Cambridge hav-
ing reached England, another royal order for their
arrest was issued in March, and reached Boston on the
28th of April. It was blunderingly addressed, ** To our
tfiisty and well-beloved, the present Governor or other
magistrate or magistrates of our plantation of New
England.'' The governor of Massachusetts, having
delayed till sufficient time had elapsed for the news to
be forwarded to New Haven, gave two young men,
recently come from England, Thomas Kcllond, mer-
chant, and Thomas Kirk, shipmaster, a commission to
prosecute the search in Massachusetts, with letters of
commendation from himself to the governors of Plym-
outh, Connecticut, New Haven, and •New Nether-
lands. On Tuesday, May 7, about six p.m., Kcllond
and Kirk, with John Chapin as guide, left Boston. On
Friday they had an interview with Gov. Winthrop at
Hartford. They ^ay in their report, "The honorable
governor carried himself very nobly to us, and was
VQvy diligent to supply us with all manner of conven-
iences for the prosecution of them, and promised all
diligent search should be made after them in that
jurisdiction, which was afterward performed." Learn-
ing from Winthrop that the "colonels," as Whalley
and Goffe were called, had gone from Hartford toward
New Haven, the pursuivants rode on Saturday to Guil-
ford, where resided Deputy-Gov. Leete, chief magis-
trate of New Haven colony since the death of Gov.
Newman.
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES. 425
Leete received them in the presence of several other
persons. Looking over their papers, "he began to
read them audibly ; whereupon we told him (says their
report) it was convenient to be more private in such
concernments as that was.'* Retiring with them to
another room, and thus giving opportunity for the rest
of the company to disperse, Leete assured them that
he had not seen the colonels for nine weeks ; that is,
since the time when they passed through Guilford on
the way from Hartford to New Haven. The pursui-
vants replied that they had information that the per-
sons they were in pursuit of had been in New Haven
since then, and desired him to furnish them with horses
for their further journey. The horses were "prepared
with some delays." Coming out from the governor's
house, they were told on their way to the inn by one
Dennis Scranton (Crampton X) that the colonels were
secreted at Mr. Davenport's, "and that, without all
question. Deputy Leete knew as much." Other per-
sons reported that they had very lately been seen
between the houses of Mr. Davenport and Mr. Jones.
Confirmed by these tidings in the belief that they
were upon the track of the fugitives, the pursui^nts
returned to Leete, and demanded military aid and "a
power to search and apprehend." But he "said he
could do nothing until he had spoken with one Mr.
Gilbert and the rest of his magistrates." He offered,
however, to give them a letter to Mr. Gilbert. By the
time the governor had made ready his letter, the sun
was too far on its way toward the western horizon to
justify any expectation that they could conclude a
conference with magistrate Gilbert before the going
426 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
down of the sun should put an end to all secular trans-
actions. They seem to have come to the conclusion,
that, in the circumstances, it was better to stay in
Guilford than to go on to New Haven, and, by their
presence there on the sabbath, notify the friends of
the regicides that search would be made for them on
the morrow. But their presence in Guilford was already
known in New Haven, for some one who heard the
governor read their commission had occasion soon after
to send an Indian runner on an errand to New Haven.
At daybreak on Monday they left Guilford for New
Haven, bearing the letter of Gov. Leete, advising Mr.
Gilbert to call the town court together, and, by their
advice and concurrence, to cause a search to be made.
But, early as they started, a messenger had been sent
before them to warn Gilbert that they were coming.
" To our certain knowledge (they say) one John Meigs
was sent a horseback before us, and by his speedy and
unexpected going so early before day, was to give them
an information ; and the rather because by the delays
which were used it was break of day before we got to
horse ; so he got there before us." Leete arrived, the
pursuivants say in their report, " within two hours or
thereabouts after us, and came to us to the court-
chamber, where we again acquainted him with the
information we had received, and that we had cause to
believe they were concealed in New Haven, and there-
upon we required his assistance and aid for their appre-
hension ; to which he answered, that he did not believe
they were. Whereupon we desired him to empower us,
or order others for it ; to which he gave us this an-
swer, that he could not, nor would not, make us magis-
trates."
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 427
Magistrate Crane, of Branford, had arrived in com-
pany with Leete. Gilbert, who was not at home when
the pursuivants inquired for him, having at last made
his appearance, and Mr. Fenn having been summoned
from Milford, — perhaps by Mr. Gilbert in person, -r-
the magistrates and the deputies for New Haven held
a consultation which lasted five or six hours. The
issue of it, as communicated to Kellond and Kirk, was
that " they would not nor could not do any thing until
they had called a general court of the freemen." The
pursuivants protested against the delay, and threatened
the magistrates and the colony with the resentment of
his Majesty. The reply was "we honor his Majesty,
but we have tender consciences." The magistrates
then held a second consultation of two or three hours ;
after which, being further pressed " to their duty and
loyalty to his Majesty, and whether they would own
his Majesty or no, it was answered, they would first
know whether his Majesty would own them."
New Haven was a government formed by the people
without any charter or commission of any kind from
England ; and its magistrates feared that by acting
under a mandate directed to the Governor of New
England they might be acknowledging a governor-
general, and thus betray the trust committed to them
under oath by the freemen of the colony. They would
do nothing, therefore, without a general court.
Evening coming on before the magistrates made
their last reply to the pursuivants, it was too late to
send forth on that day a warrant for convening the
court. On Tuesday it was sent to the several planta-
tions, and the court was held on Friday. The pursui-
428 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
vants, however, could not wait so long for a meeting
which promised so little. Offering " great rewards to
English and Indians who should give information that
they might be taken," they departed on Tuesday for New
Amsterdam, not without hope of finding, and, with the
help of the Dutch governor, apprehending the fugitives.
From New Amsterdam they returned by sea to Boston,
where, on the 30th of May, they made oath to the
truth of the written report which they delivered to
Gov. Endicott.
On the Saturday when Kellond and Kirk were in
Guilford, Whalley and Goffe, leaving the house of Mr.
Jones, in which they had been* secreted since the 30th
of April, went to the mill ' two miles north of the town,
where they remained till Monday. We can easily con-
jecture that they did not make themselves visible at
the mill till the last customer had departed, and that
they went away on Monday morning before the earli-
est grist was brought. Beyond the mill all was an un-
' Dr. Bacon places the mill to which the regicides went for conceal-
ment till the sabbath was past, at Westville; but I do not find on the
records evidence that there was at that time any other mill than that on
Mill River. This mill having become rotten, and new mill-stones being
required for it, an unsuccessful attempt had been made not long before
to bring the water from the Beaver Pond in a trench, so that an overshot
mill might be set up in the town. On the first day of December, 1662,
there was a general court, at which nothing was said about the mill, and
on the third day of the same month a special meeting was held and " the
occasion of coming together " was " the sad providence of God that was
fallen out in the burning of the mill." Doubtless it was burned after the
meeting, two days before. It was regarded as a calamity, not only Ijecausc
of the loss of property, but because of the inconvenience of going to
Milford for meal. The mill was soon after rebuilt in the same place.
The mill-house, which was consumed by fire in 1662, was doubtless the
same which in 1661 sheltered the regicides.
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES. 429
broken wilderness ; so that if the pursuivants had come
to New Haven on Saturday, furnished with a search-
warrant, the fugitives might, at any moment, by retir-
ing a few miles into the forest, have become secure.
Probably this was their design after Mr. Jones had
learned from the Indian runner what was going on in
Guilford ; but as their enemies did not leave Guilford
till Monday, they deemed it safe to sleep under a roof.
No more appropriate time could be suggested for
the allusion which Mr. Davenport is believed to have
made to the regicides in the pulpit, than the sabbath
intervening between the two nights they spent at the
mill. In a series of sermons substantially reproduced
afterward in a book entitled "The Saint's Anchor-
Hold," he inculcated among other duties that of sym-
pathizing with and helping those who, for Christ's sake,
are in trouble.
"Brethren, it is a weighty matter to read letters and receive
intelligence in them concerning the state of the churches. You
need to lift up your hearts to God, when you are' about to read
your letters from our native country, to give you wisdom and
hearts duly affected, that you may receive such intelligences as
you ought ; for God looks upon every man, in such cases, with a
jealous eye, observing with what workings of bowels they read or
speak of the concernments of his church." . . . . " The Christian
Hebrews are exhorted to call to remembrance the former days in
which, after they were illuminated, they endured a great fight of
afflictions partly whilst they were made a gazing stock both by
reproaches and afflictions, and partly whilst they became com-
panions of them that were so used. Let us do likewise, and own
the reproached and persecuted people and cause of Christ in
suffering times.
"Withhold not countenance, entertainment, and protection,
from such, if they come to us from other countries, as from France,
430 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
or England, or any other place. Be not forgetful to entertain
strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them, and them
who suffer adversity, as being yourselves also in the body. The
Lord required this of Moab, sa>nng, 'Make thy shadow as the
night in the midst of the noonday;' — that is, provide safe and
comfortable shelter and refreshment for my people in the heat of
persecution and opposition raised against them: — 'hide the out-
casts, bewray not him that wandereth : let mine outcasts dwell
with thee, Moab ; be thou a covert to them from the face of the
spoiler.' Is it objected. But so I may expose myself to be spoiled
or troubled ? He therefore, to remove this objection, addeth, * For
the danger is at an end, the spoiler ceaseth; the trcaders down
are consumed out of the land.' While we are attending to our
duty in owning and harboring Christ's witnesses, God will be pro-
viding for their and our safety, by destroying those that would
destroy his people." '
On Monday, May 13, Whalley and Goffe were con-
ducted by Mr. Jones and two other friends some three
miles into the wilderness beyond the mill, where, a
booth having been constructed, the colonels spent two
nights. Having found a hatchet at the moment when
one was needed for constructing the booth, they called
the place Hatchet Harbor. On Wednesday, Kellond and
Kirk being now far on their way to New Amsterdam, it
was safe for Whalley and Goffe to come nearer to the
habitations of men, and they were on that day con-
ducted to West Rock, or Providence Hill, as they
named it, by Richard Sperry, one of the three friends
' But as a copy of the book was presented by Davenport to Sir
Thomas Temple in August, 1661, it would seem that the discourse from
which the above is extracted must have been preached at an earlier date.
The time intervening between May and August would hardly suffice for
sending the manuscript to England, and receiving in return the printed
copies.
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 43 1
who had guided them to Hatchet Harbor. Here were
several huge fragments of trap rock, placed so as, with
the aid of hemlock boughs, to shield the space amidst
them from the wind, and some of them projecting
overhead so as to afford shelter from rain. This clus-
ter of rocks, which has ever since been called the
Judges' Cave, was the refuge of these hunted regicides
from May 15 to June 11. They were supplied with
food from day to day by the faithful Sperry, whose
house at the foot of the hill, though much nearer than
any other, was nearly a mile distant. It is not unrea-
sonable to conjecture that they went down in the even-
ing to Sperry's house to sleep, and returned early in
the morning to the cave, though tradition allows only
that they sometimes came to the house in stormy
weather. Probably not more than three or four per-
sons knew that they were in Sperry's neighborhood ;
perhaps of the few who knew that he supplied their
wants and guarded the approach to their privacy, none
but himself had ever seen the Judges' Cave.
On Friday, two days after Whalley and Goffe had
removed from Hatchet Harbor to West Rock, —
" At a meeting of the General Court for the jurisdiction, May
17, 1661, the deputy-governor declared to the Court the cause of
the meeting ; viz., that he had received a copy of a letter from his
Majesty, with another letter from the governor of the Massachu-
setts, for the apprehending of Col. Whalley and Col. Goffe ; which
letters he showed to the Court, and acquainted them that forth-
with upon the receipt of them he granted his letter to the magis-
trate of New Haven, by advice and concurrence of the deputies
there to make present and diligent search throughout their town
for the said persons accordingly; which letter the messengers
carried, but found not the magistrate at home ; and that he him-
432 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
self followed after the messengers, and came into New Haven soon
after them, the 13th of May, 1661, bringing with him Mr. Crane,
magistrate at Branford ; who, when they were come, sent pres-
ently for the magistrates of New Haven and Milford, and the
deputies of New Haven Court. The magistrates thus sent for
not being yet come, they advised with the deputies about the
matter, and, after a short debate with the deputies, were writing
a warrant for search for the aforesaid colonels ; but the magis-
trates before spoken of being come, upon further consideration
(the matter being weighty) it was resolved to call the General
Court for the effectual carrying on of the work. The deputy-
governor further informed the Court that himself and the magis-
trates told the messengers that they were far from hindering the
search, and they were sorry that it so fell out, and w^ere resolved
to pursue the matter as that an answer should be prepared against
their return from the Dutch.
" The Court being met, when they heard the matter declared,
and had heard his Majesty's letter and the letter from the gov-
ernor of the Massachusetts, they all declared they did not know
that they were in the colony, or had been for divers weeks past,
and both magistrates and deputies wished a search had been
sooner made ; and did now order that the magistrates take care
and send forth warrant that a speedy, diligent search be made
throughout the jurisdiction, in pursuance of his Majesty's com-
mand, according to the letters received, and that from the several
plantations a return be made, that it may be recorded.*
* The following is a copy of one of the warrants, and of the return
made by the searchers : —
** May 17, 1661.
For the Marshal or Deputies at Milford.
You arc to make diligent search, by the first, throughout the whole
town of Milford and the precincts thereof, taking with you two or three
sufficient persons, and calling in any other help you shall see 4ieed of, who
are hereby required to attend for your assistance upon call ; and this to
Ix: in all dwelling houses, bams or other buildings whatsoever and vessels
in the harbor, for the finding and apprehending of Colonel Whalley and
Colonel Goffc, who stand charged with crimes as by his Majesty's letter
appears j and being found, you are to bring them to the Deputy Governor,
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 433
" And whereas there have been rumors of their late being here
at New Haven, it hath been inquired into and several persons
examined, but could find no truth in those reports, and for any
thing yet doth appear, they are but unjust suspicions and ground-
less reports against the place, to raise ill surmises and reproaches."
Learning that Mr. Davenport was suspected of con-
cealing them, Whalley and Goffe left West Rock on
the nth of June, and showed themselves publicly, that
he might be relieved from suspicion. It is not known
at the present day where they spent the time between
the I ith and the 22d of the month. Mr. Davenport, in
a letter to Sir Thomas Temple, says that they came on
the 22d of June "from another colony where they
were, and had been some time, to New Haven." *
or some other magistrate, to be sent over for England, according to his
Majesty's order. Hereof fail not at peril.
By order of the General Court,
As attest, William Leete, Deputy Governor,
Jasper Crane,
Matthew Gilbert,
Robert Treat.
In the marshal's absence, I do appoint and empower you, Thomas
SanCord, Nicholas Camp, and James Tapping to the above named pow-
ers, according to the tenor of the warrant ; and to make a return thereof
under your hands to me by the first.
Robert Treat.
We, the said persons, appointed to serve and search by virtue of this
our warrant, do hereby declare and testify that to our best light we have
the 2oth of May, i66f , made diligent search according to the tenor of this
warrant, as witness our hands.
Thomas Sanford
Nicholas Camp
James Tapping
Lawrence Ward, hfs I mark
^ It has been said that '* Mr. Davenport*s statement looks like a pre-
varication." Doubtless it was, as every thing which the New Haven
• Searchers,^*
434 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Perhaps they made a visit to Connecticut, and allowed
themselves to be seen there in order to divert attention
from New Haven. On Saturday, June 22, they came
to New Haven, and remained till Monday, causing Mr.
Gilbert, who, since the election on the 29th of May,
had been deputy-governor, to be informed that they
were ready to surrender, if necessary, and choosing to
do so rather than bring ruin upon their friends. But
on Sunday some persons came to them advising not to
surrender ; and so on Monday they disappeared while
the magistrates were consulting together, and taking
measures for their arrest. "Thereupon a diligent
search was renewed, and many were sent forth on foot
and horseback to recover them into their hands."
From a letter of Edward Rawson, secretary of the
colony of Massachusetts to Gov. Leete, it may be in-
ferred that these pursuers went to Branford. But if
the regicides were seen going in that direction, as if
they would return to Connecticut, it was only to mis-
lead, for the same night they were lodged in their
former retreat at West Rock.' "They continued there
people said about the two regicides was, a prevarication, but there is no
reason to doubt that the statement was literally true. Mr. Davenport
was a subtile causuist, but was not reckless of the truth.
' I conjecture that going eastward as far as Neck Bridge, they hid
themselves under it till the pursuers had ridden over, and then, passing
up by the side of the stream to the mill, went by Mill Rock to the house
of Sperr>*. This conjecture accounts for the tradition that they were
under the bridge when Kellond and Kirk passed over it ; in which form
the tradition has no inherent probability.
The tradition that they were concealed in the Allerton house, I cannot
account for quite so satisfactorily. Stiles relates that their friend, Mrs.
Eyers, hearing that the pursuers were coming, sent the colonels out of
the house with directions to return immediately. They returning, she
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES. 435
(says Hutchinson, who had access to a diary of Goffe,
not now extant), sometimes venturing to a house near
the cave, until the 19th of August, when the search
for them being pretty well over, they ventured to the
^^^Vv house of one Tomkins, near Milford, where they re-
3(.j mained two years without so much as going into the
orchard. After that they took a little more liberty,
and made themselves known to several persons in
whom they could confide ; and each of them frequently
prayed, and also exercised, as they term it, or preached
at private meetings in their chamber."
The regicides lying concealed at West Rock, Gov.
Leete received on the 30th of July a letter written by
order of the council of Massachusetts informing that
they had heard from the agent of their colony in
London that many complaints were made against New
England in general, and that though the address to his
concealed them in a closet, and promptly replied, when the pursuers asked
for the colonels, that they had been there, but had recently gone away.
Mrs. Eyers, granddaughter of the Isaac AUerton who came in the May-
flower, was born Sept. 27, 1653, and therefore was in June, 1661, less than
eight years of age. If, therefore, Whallcy and Goffe were concealed in
the house where she lived, they were concealed by the contrivance of her
step-grandmother, the widow Allcrton, rather than of the person who
afterward became the owner of the Allerton mansion, and the wife of
Simon Eyers. The tradition may have been handed down by her, but she
could not have been the principal actor. Perhaps the colonels were
entertained in this house from Saturday, June 22, to Monday, June 24, and
went from Mrs. Allerton's toward Neck Bridge after they learned that
the magistrates had issued a warrant for their arrest. This would account
for another tradition; viz., that Marshal Kimberlcy attempted to arrest
them between the town and Neck Bridge, but found them so skilled in the
art of self-defence that he was obliged to go back for assistance. For
further information in regard to Mrs. Eyers and the Allertons, see Dr.
Bacon's letter to Hon. John Davis, in Mass. Hist Coll. XXVII. 243.
4-ft
436 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Majesty which Massachusetts had made, came season-
ably and had a gracious answer, yet the commissioners
for the Plantations had taken notice that the other
colonies had neglected thus to recognize the king.
The secretary adds, —
" Further I am required to signify to you as from them that the
non-attendance with diligence to execute the king's majesty's war-
rant for the apprehending of Colonels Whalley and GofFe will
much hazard the present state of these colonies, and your own
particularly, if not some of your persons, which is not a little
afflictive to them ; and that in their understanding there remains
no way to expiate the offence and preserve yourselves from the
danger and hazard but by apprehending the said persons, who, as
we are informed, are yet remaining in the colony, and not above a
fortnight since were seen there, all which will be against you. Sir,
your own welfare, the welfare of your neighbors, bespeak your
unwearied pains to free yourself and neighbors. I shall not add,
having so lately, by a few lines from our governor and myself
looking much this way, communicated our sense and thoughts of
your and our troubles, and have as yet received no return, but com-
mend you to God and his rich grace for your guidance and direc-
tion in a matter of such moment, as his Majesty may receive full
and just satisfaction, the mouths of all opposers stopped, and the
profession of the truth that is in you and us may not in the least
sufEer by your actings is the prayer of
Sir, your loving friend,
Edward Rawson, Secretary,
In the name and by order of the Council."
The above was written on the 4th of July, 1661, but
remained in the hand of the writer till the 15th of the
same month, when he added, —
" Sir, since what I wrote, news and certain intelligence is come
hither of the two colonels being at New Haven from Saturday to
Monday, and publicly known ; and, however, it is given out that
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES. All
they came to surrender themselves, and pretended by Mr. Gilbert
that he looked when they would have come in and delivered up
themselves, never setting a guard about the house nor endeavoring
to secure them, but, when it was too late, to send to Totoket, &c.
Sir, how this will be taken is not difficult to imagine. To be sure,
not well ; nay, will not all men condemn you as wanting to your-
selves, and that you have something to rely on, that you hope, at
least, will answer your ends ? I am not willing to meddle with
your hopes, but if it be a duty to obey such lawful warrants, as I
believe it is, the neglect thereof will prove uncomfortable. Pardon
me, sir; it is my desire you may regain your peace (and if you
please to give me notice when you will send the two colonels);
though Mr. Woodgreen is bound hence within a month, yet if you
shall give me assurance of their coming, I shall not only endeavor,
but do hereby engage, to cause his stay a fortnight, nay, three
weeks, rather than they should not be sent"
At a general court held at New Haven for the juris-
diction, Aug. I, i66i : — "the governor informed the
Court of the occasion of calling them together at this
time, and among the rest the main thing insisted on
was to consider what application to make to the king
in the case we now stood, being like to be rendered
worse to the king than the other colonies, they seeing
it an incumbent duty so to do. The governor informed
also the Court that he had received a letter from the
Council in the Bay, which was read, wherein was inti-
mated of sundry complaints in England made against
New England, and that the committee in England took
notice of the neglect of the other colonies in their non-
application to the king.
" Now the Court, taking the matter into serious con-
sideration, after much debate and advice concluded that
this writing should be sent to the Council in the Bay,
the copy whereof is as followeth:" —
438 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
"Honored Gentlemen, — Yours dated the 4th of July (61),
with a postscript of the 15th, we received July 30, which was com-
municated to our general court Aug. i, who considered what you
please to relate of those complaints made against New England,
and of what spirit they are represented to be of, upon occasion of
that false report against Capt. Leveret, whom we believe to have
more wisdom and honesty than so to report, and we are assured
that New England is not of that spirit. And as for the other colo-
nies' neglect in non-application with yourselves to his Majesty last
year, it hath not been forborne upon any such account, as we for
our parts profess, and believe for our neighbors, but only in such
new and unaccustomed matters we were in the dark to hit it in way
of agreement as to a form satisfactory that might be acceptable;
but since that of your colony hath come to our view, it is much to
our content, and we solemnly profess from our hearts to own and
say the same to his Majesty, and do engage to him full subjection
and allegiance with yourselves accordingly, with profession of the
same ends in coming with like permission and combining with
yourselves and the other neighbor colonies, as by the preface of
our articles may appear; upon which grounds we both supplicate
and hope to find a like protection, privilege, immunities, and favors,
from his royal Majesty. And as for that you note of our not so
diligent attendance to his Majesty's warrant, we have given you an
account of before, that it was not done out of any mind to slight or
disown his Majesty's authority in the least, nor out of favor to the
colonels ; nor did it hinder the effect of their apprehending, they
being gone before the warrant came into our colony, as is since
fully proved ; but only there was a gainsaying of the gentlemen's
earnestness, who retarded their own business to wait upon ours
without commission ; and also out of scruple of conscience and fear
of unfaithfulness to our people (who committed all our authority to
us under oath) by owning a general governor, unto whom the war-
rant was directed, as such implicitly, and that upon misinformation
to his Majesty given, though other magistrates were mentioned, yet
(as some thought) it was in or under him, which oversight (if so it
shall be apprehended) we hope, upon our humble acknowledg-
ment, his Majesty will pardon, as also that other and greater
bewailed remissness in one, in not securing them till we came and
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 439
knew their place, out of over-much belief of their pretended reality
■ to resign up themselves, according to their promise, to save the
country harmless, which failing is so much the more lamented, by
how much more we had used all diligence to press for such a
delivery upon some of those that had showed them former kind-
ness, as had been done other where, when as none of the magis-
trates could otherwise do any thing in it, they being altogether
ignorant where they were or how to come at them, nor truly do
they now, nor can we believe that they are hid anywhere in this
colony, since that departure or defeatment. But however the con-
sequence prove, we must wholly rely on the mercy of God and the
king, with promise to do our endeavor to regain them if opportu-
nity serve. Wherefore in this our great distress we earnestly
desire your aid to present us to his Majesty in our cordial owning
and complying with your address, as if it had been done and said
by our very selves, who had begun to draw up something that way,
but were disheartened. through sense of feebleness, and incapacity
to procure a meet agent to present it in our disadvantaged state»
by these providences occurring ; hoping you will favor us in this
latter and better pleasing manner of doing, which we shall take
thankfully from you, and be willing to join in the proportionate
share of charge for a common agent to solicit New England affairs
in England, which we think necessary to procure the benefit of all
acts of indemnity, grace, or favor, on all our behalfs, as well as in
other respects to prevent the mischiefs of such as malign and seek
to misinform against us, of which sort there be many to comptot
nowadays with great sedulity. If you shall desert us in this
affliction to present us as before, by the transcript of this our letter
or otherwise, together with the petition and acknowledgment
herewithal sent, we shall yet look up to our God, that deliverance
may arise another way."
This letter manifests a fear of e^il results to the
colony and to the magistrates from their neglect to
apprehend the regicides. It was doubtless drawn up
by Gov. Leete, who by this time was so much in fear
for himself and for the colony that the fugitives would
440 HISTORY OF KEIV HAVEN COLO AT V.
not have been safe if he had known where to put his
hand on them. The freemen allowed this letter to be
sent as the sense of the colony ; and perhaps a ma-
jority sympathized with Leete in the feeling that the
safety of the colony required their extradition if found,
and agreed with him in the belief that they were not at
that time within its territory ; but a few were more
courageous, and, quietly allowing the letter to be sent
as the official declaration of the colony, kept to them-
selves their knowledge that Whalley and Goffe were
still within the jurisdiction. Of this number were Gil-
bert and Davenport, though even they were probably
not aware that the fugitives were so near that they
could see the turret of the building in which the court
was held, and hear the rattle of the drum which con-
vened it.
The difference of opinion on this subject which now
obtained among the leading men seems to have occa-
sioned some sharpness of feeling. Mr. Hooke, Whal-
ley's brother-in-law, and formerly teacher of the church
at New Haven, writes from England about ten weeks
after this general court, to Mr. Davenport, *' I under-
stand by your letter what you have lately met with
from Mr. Leete, &c.," and proceeds to explain that a
certain letter from a friend in England to Mr. Street
was not designed to caution New Haven people against
befriending the regicides, but only against doing it
openly. " The man was in the country- when he wrote
it, who sent it up to the city to be sent by what hand
he knew not, nor yet knoweth who carried it ; and such
were the times that he durst not express matters as he
would, but he foresaw what fell out among you, and was
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 44I
willing you should be secured as well as his other
friends, and therefore he wrote that they might not be
found among you, but provided for by you in some
secret places. ... I hope yet all will be well ; though
now I hear (as I am writing) of another order to be
sent over, yet still I believe God will suffer no man to
touch you. I am almost amazed sometimes to see
what cross capers some of you do make. I should
break my shins should I do the like." Gov. Leete had
apparently understood the cautionary letter to Mr.
Street as advising an entire withholding of entertain-
ment from the regicides, and had changed his position
by a cross caper, such as Mr. Hooke thought himself
incapable of executing.
Another intimation that Mr. Leete had become more
penitent than others approved, is contained in a letter
to Mr. Gilbert from Robert Newman, formerly ruling
elder in the church at New Haven, but now resident
in England. He writes, ** I am sorry to see that you
should be so much surprised with fears of what men
can or may do unto you. The fear of an evil is oft-
times more than the evil feared. I hear of no danger,
nor do I think any will attend you for that matter.
Had not W. L. written such a pitiful letter over, the
business, I think, would have died. What it may do to
him I know not : they have greater matters than that
to exercise their thoughts.'* On the same day another
friend in England wrote to Gilbert, ** We are very apt
to be more afraid than we ought to be, or need to be."
The letter drawn up by Gov. Leete, and sanctioned
by the General Court on the ist of August, was sent
to Boston by special messengers, who were to "see
442 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
what would be done in the case." Twenty days later
another court was held, occasioned by information that
Massachusetts had, on the 7th of August, formally pro-
claimed the king. Anxious not to come short in
demonstrations of loyalty, "it was voted and concluded
as an act of the General Court,'* that the king should
be proclaimed.
"And for the time of doing it, it was concluded to be done the
next morning at nine of the clock, and the military company was
desired to come to the solemnizing of it And the form of the
proclamation is as followeth : —
" Although we have not received any form of proclamation by
order from his Majesty or Council of State, for the proclaiming
his Majesty in this colony, yet the Court taking encouragement
from what halh been in the rest of the United Colonies, hath
thought fit to declare publicly and proclaim that we do acknowledge
his Royal Highness, Charles the Second, King of England, Scot-
land, France, and Ireland, to be our Sovereign Lord and King, and
that we do acknowledge ourselves the inhabitants of this colony to
be his Majesty^s loyal and faithful subjects." God save the
King.
These public demonstrations of loyalty were prompted
in large measure by fear of evil consequences to the
colony, on account of its neglect to apprehend the regi-
cides. They were supplemented with every possible
attempt to secure the aid of those whose position ena-
bled them to make intercession with the king. Before
the official communication of Secretary Ravvson had
been received at New Haven, a letter from Davenport
to Deputy-Gov. Bellingham was on its way to Bos-
ton, enclosing what he calls an apology. In August,
fearing that his apology had miscarried, he wrote to
Sir Thomas Temple, enclosing a copy of the apology,
THE STUARTS AND THE REGICIDES, 443
and very humbly beseeching his good offices in averting
from the colony of New Haven the displeasure of the
king. In September Gov. Leete went to Boston, prob-
ably on his way to or from the meeting of the commis-
sioners of the United Colonies at Plymouth, to consult
with friends there how he might escape the punishment
of his neglect. The result of the conference was a
letter from John Norton, teacher of the church at Bos-
ton, to Richard Baxter, one of the king's chaplains. It
is to be inferred from Norton's letter that there had
been a change in Leete's spirit since he received Kel-
lond and Kirk in his house at Guilford and read their
instructions aloud in the presence of his neighbors.
Norton says : —
** He, being conscious of indiscretion and some neglect (not to
say how it came about) in relation to the expediting the executing
of the warrant, according to his duty, sent from his Majesty for
the apprehending of the two colonels, is not without fear of some
displeasure that may follow thereupon, and indeed hath almost
ever since been a man depressed in his spirit for the neglect
wherewith he chargeth himself therein. His endeavors also since
have been accordingly, and that in full degree ; as, besides his own
testimony, his neighbors attest they see not what he could have
done more."
At their meeting in September, the commission-
ers of the United Colonies issued an order forbidding
the entertainment of Whallcy and Goffe, and requiring
all persons who knew where they were to make known
their hiding-place. This order, with the other pro-
ceedings, was signed by William Leete and Benjamin
Fenn, commissioners for New Haven, the last named
an inhabitant of Milford, where Whalley and Goffe
444 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
were then concealed. There is no evidence that Fenn
was in the secret, and no good reason can be alleged
why he should have been embarrassed with useless
information.
Whalley and Goffe remained in Milford from Aug.
19, 1661, till July, 1664, when, hearing that four royal
commissioners had arrived in Boston, charged to inquire
after persons attainted of high treason, they thought
it necessary to leave the place where they had so long
resided. At first they retired to their cave on West
Rock. But after they had remained there eight or
ten days, some Indians, in their hunting, discovered the
cave with the bed in it. This being reported, they
were obliged to find another temporary retreat, the
location of which is unknown. Probably they were
unwillingly tarrying in New Haven till arrangements
could be made for their removal to a less suspected
and less frequented place. Starting on the 13th of
October, and travelling only by night, they directed
their steps toward Hadlcy, Mass., a plantation in the
remotest north-western frontier of the New England
settlements, recently established by emigrants from
Hartford and Wethersfield. Here they were, by pre-
arrangement, received and concealed by Mr. John Rus-
sell, the minister of the town. With him they both
continued to reside till the death of Whalley, about ten
years afterward. But with their removal to Hadley
their connection with the history of the New Haven
colony ceases.
CHAPTER XIX.
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER WHICH COVERS
THE TERRITORY OF NEW HAVEN.
KING JAMES THE FIRST incorporated by let-
ters-patent the " Council established at Plymouth
in the county of Devon for the planting, ruling, and gov-
erning of New England in America," and granted unto
them and their successors and assigns all that part
of America lying between the fortieth and forty-eighth
degree of north latitude, and extending from sea to
sea. This "Council for New England," having sold
patents to New Plymouth and Massachusetts, granted
to its president, Robert, Earl of Warwick, a territory
supposed to be bounded on the east and north by
New Plymouth and Massachusetts, and the grant was
confirmed by King Charles the First. On the 19th
of March the said Robert, Earl of Warwick, conveyed
his title to the right honorable William, viscount Say
and Seal, the right honorable Robert, Lord Brook, the
right honorable Lord Rich, and the honorable Charles
Fiennes, Esq., Sir Nathanael Rich, Knt., Sir Rich-
ard Saltonstall, Knt., Richard Knightly, Esq., John
Pym, Esq., John Hampden, John Humphrey, Esq., and
Herbert Pelham, Esq., their heirs and assigns, and
their associates, forever. He describes the territory as
445
446 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
" all that part of New England in America, which lies
and extends itself from a river there called Narragan-
set River, the space of forty leagues upon a straight
line near the sea-shore toward the south-west, west
and by south, or west, as the coast lieth towards Vir-
ginia, accounting three English miles to the league ;
and also all and singular the lands and hereditaments
whatsoever, lying and being within the lands aforesaid,
north and south in latitude and breadth, and in length
and longitude, of and within all the breadth aforesaid,
throughout the main lands there, from the Western
Ocean to the South Sea."
The first planters of Hartford, Windsor, and Weth-
ersfield settled themselves in the territory thus con-
veyed by the Earl of Warwick, without asking leave
of the patentees. Some years afterward, a fort having
been meanwhile built at Saybrook by the patentees, .
the colonial government purchased of Mr. Fenwick, the
representative of the patentees, the fort and the lands
upon the river. In the articles of agreement Mr. F*en-
wick also promises that " all the lands from Narragan-
set River to the fort of Saybrook, mentioned in a patent
granted by the Earl of Warwick to certain nobles and
gentlemen, shall fall under the jurisdiction of Connecti-
cut if it come into his power," but makes no mention
of, or allusion to, the territory occupied by the New
Haven colony.
So far as appears, no claim was made by Connecticut
to the territory of New Haven till 1660. In that year
the town of New Haven, wishing to " set out the bounds
with lasting marks," between them and Connecticut,
appointed Mr. Yale, William Andrews, John Cooper,
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER. 447
John Brocket, and Nathaniel Merriman, a committee
to do it with the help of Montowese, the late proprie-
tor. Connecticut took offence at the proceedings of
this committee, and sent to New Haven the following
letter : —
" Honored Gentlemen, — This Court having received informa-
tion, not only by what appears in one of your laws respecting the
purchase of land from the Indians, wherein there is a seeming
challenge of very large interests of lands, and likewise by what
intelligence we have had of your stretching your bounds up toward
us, by marking trees on this side Pilgrims' Harbor,* which things,
as ye intrench upon our interest, so they are not satisfying or
contentful, nor do we apprehend it a course furthering or strength-
ening that friendly correspondency that we desire and ought to be
perpetuated betwixt neighbors and confederates; especially in
that we conceive you cannot be ignorant of our real and true right
to those parts of the country where you are seated, both by con-
quest, purchase, and possession; and though hitherto we have
been silent and altogether forborne to make any absolute challenge
to our own, as before, yet now we see a necessity at least to revive
the memorial of our right and interest, and therefore do desire that
there may be a cessation of further proceedings in this nature, until
upon mature consideration there may be a determinate settlement
and mutual concurrence twixt yourselves and this colony in refer-
ence to the dividing lx)unds twixt the two colonies. It is further de-
sired and requested by us that if there be any thing extant on rec-
ord with you that may further the deciding this matter, it may be
produced, and that there may be a time and place appointed, when
some deputed for that end, furnished with full power, may meet,
that so a loving issue may be effected to prevent further troubles.
And in case there be no record of grant or allowance from this
* Pilgrims* Harbor, it appears, was so called before this letter was
written. It was probably a hut where travellers between Hartford and
New Haven found shelter. If the regicides ever made use of it, it was
after this letter was written. It was not, as President Stiles suggests,
called Pilgrims* Harbor because the regicides lodged in it
448 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
colony, resp>ecting the surrender not only of lands possessed by
you and improved, but also such lands as it seems to us that you,
under some pretended or assumed right, have induced by your
bounds within your liberties, that you would be pleased to consider
on some speedy course, whereby a compliance and condescendency
to what is necessary and convenient for your future comfort may
be obtained from us, the true proprietors of these parts of coun-
tr}'. We desire your return to our General Court in reference to
our propositions, with what convenient speed may be, that so what
is desired by us in point of mutual and neighborly correspondence,
according to the rules of justice and righteousness, may be still
maintained and continued/'
Action was taken on this letter at a general court
held at New Haven for the jurisdiction, May 29, 1661.
It was " ordered that a committee be chosen by this
Court for the treating with and issuing of any seeming
difference betwixt Connecticut Colony and this, in refer-
ence to the dividing bounds betwixt them, and of some
seeming right to this jurisdiction, which they pretend
in a letter sent to this General Court.'*
This order was passed thirteen days after the General
Court of Connecticut had desired and authorized Gov.
Winthrop to act as the agent of the colony in present-
ing their address to the king, and in procuring a
patent. Though the extant copy of the letter in which
Connecticut for the first time lays claim to the territory
of New Haven bears no date, it was written about the
time when they were considering the expediency of
applying for the charter which they soon after obtained.
They had no copy of the conveyance from the Earl of
Warwick ; and if they had possessed a copy, or even
the original, Mr. Fenwick had conveyed to them only
what his agreement specified. It is evident that about
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER, 449
this time they conceived the design of procuring a royal
charter which should secure to them the whole territory
conveyed to Lord Say and Seal and others, by the Earl
of Warwick, even if it should include the territory of
New Haven. They justified themselves in doing so on
the ground, that, having paid a large sum to Mr. Fen-
wick, they ought to have received for it all the territory
covered by the patent which he and his associates
possessed. They felt and represented to the aged Lord
Say and Seal that Mr. Fen wick had dealt hardly with
them, and that they ought to receive whatever was
reserved by him as the representative of the patentees.
While they were all agreed that it was right for Con-
necticut to acquire, if possible, a legal title as extensive
as the patent from the Earl of Warwick, the New
Haven people having paid nothing to the patentees,
they were not of one mind as to the disposition to be
made of New Haven ; some holding that New Haven
should be at liberty to join with them or not, whil6
others maintained that the welfare of all parties justi-
fied the compulsion of New Haven into union with
Connecticut. Gov. Winthrop was himself of the first-
mentioned party ; for when Davenport, hearing what
was going on at Hartford, wrote to his friend, warning
him ** not to have his hand in so unrighteous an act as
so far to extend the line of their patent, that the colony
of New Haven should be involved within it," Win-
throp replied,' "that the magistrates had agreed and
' The extract is from Davenport's report of Winthrop*s letters in
"New Haven's Case Stated." Winthrop wrote twice "from two several
places : " first from Middletown, and again from New Amsterdam "at his
going away." This looks as if he did not pass through New Haven in
450 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
expressed in the presence of some ministers, that, if
their line should reach us (which they knew not, the
copy being in England), yet New Haven Colony should
be at full liberty to join with them or not."
Embarking at New Amsterdam some time in August,
Winthrop went to England, both to transact business
of his own and to execute the commission with which
he was intrusted by Connecticut. He was most favora-
bly received by Lord Say and Seal, to whom he carried
a letter from the General Court of Connecticut. His
lordship writes to him, Dec. 14, 1661 : —
" Far my very laving friend^ Mr. John Winthrop^ living in Cole-
man Street^ at one Mrs, Whiting^ s house^ near the church,
"Mr. Winthrop, — I received your letter by Mr. Richards,
and I would have been glad to have had an opportunity of being
at London myself to have done you and my good friends in New
England the best service I could; but my weakness hath been
such, and my old disease of the gout falling upon me, I did desire
leave not to come up this winter, but I have writ to the Earl of
Manchester, lord chamberlain of His Majesty's household, to g^ve
you the best assistance he may; and indeed, he is a noble and
worthy lord, and one that loves those that are godly. And he and
I did join together, that our godly friends of New England might
enjoy their just rights and liberties ; and this. Col. Crowne, who,
I hear, is still in London, can fully inform you. Concerning that
of Connecticut, I am not able to remember all the particulars ; but
I have written to my lord chamberlain, that when you shall attend
him (which I think will be best for you to do, and therefore I have
enclosed a letter to him in yours), that you may deliver it, and I
going from Hartford to his place of embarkation. A passage in a shallop
down the river was more convenient for one who was on the way to
Europe than a horseback-ride through the country. From a letter of
Willet to Winthrop printed in Mass. Hist Coll., xli., p. 396, it appears
that Winthrop went to England by way of Holland.
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER. 451
have desired him to acquaint you where you may speak with Mr.
Jesup, who, when we had the patent, was our clerk, and he, I
believe, is able to inform you best about it, and I have desired my
lord to wish him so to do. I do think he is now in London. My
love remembered unto you, I shall remain,
" Your very loving friend,
"W. Say and Seal."
Lord Say and Seal, and the other Puritan lords and
gentlemen to whom the Earl of Warwick conveyed his
title to Connecticut, Jiad secured the territory for the
purpose of establishing a Puritan colony, and with the
expectation that some of themselves would personally
engage in the enterprise. Twenty-five years before,
Winthrop himself had been constituted their agent,
with instructions ** to provide able men to the number
of fifty at the least, for making of fortifications and
building of houses at the river Connecticut and the
harbor adjoining, first for their own present accommo-
dations, and then such houses as may receive men of
quality, which latter houses we would have to be builded
within the fort." Not one, however, of the lords and
gentlemen named by Warwick in his conveyance, came
to Connecticut. Of the "men of quality" who in 1635
signed the agreement with Winthrop, the only one that
came over was George Fenwick ; and he was not one
of the original patentees, but had become a partner in
the company subsequent to the conveyance from the
Earl of Warwick in 163 1. He seems from the day of
his arrival to have full power to dispose of every thing
belonging to the company ; and in his conveyance of
the fort and the lands on the river to the colony of
Connecticut he makes no mention of any other con-
452 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
veyor than himself. His whole conduct is that of a
principal rather than of an agent. He had doubtless
acquired from the other partners all their rights. At
what date he had become sole proprietor, we cannot
determine. Perhaps it was before he came over in
1639 J fo^ most of the patentees were then and had
been for some time so earnestly and deeply engaged
in saving their native land from the encroachments of
tyranny, that they must have relinquished the idea of
emigration. Notably, two of them. Viscount Say and
Seal and John Hampden, had committed themselves to
resist the requirement of ship-money ; and Hampden
was prosecuted rather than Say and Seal, only because
his case had a prior standing on the docket. At all
events, Fenwick talks and acts, in 1644 and 1645, as
if he were sole proprietor. In 1644 he makes the con-
veyance before mentioned, to the colony of Connecticut
in his own name ; and in 1645 he makes a free gift to
the plantation of Guilford of land, which, in his sale to
the colony of Connecticut, he had reserved for his
plantation of Saybrook. His letter of gift is so illus-
trative of his character and of the condition of Guilford
as to deserve transcription in full. It is as follows : —
" Mr. Leete, — I have been moved by Mr. Wliitfield to enlarge
the bounds of your plantation, which otherwise, he told me, could
not comfortably subsist, unto Hammonassett River ; to gratify so
good a friend, and to supply your wants, I have yielded to his
request, which, according to his request, by this bearer I signify to
you for your own and the plantation's better satisfaction, hoping
it will be a means fully to settle such who, for want of fit accom-
modation, begun to be wavering amongst you ; and I would com-
mend to your consideration one particular, which, I conceive, might
tend to common advantage, and that is, when you are all suited to
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER, 453
your present content, you will bind yourselves more strictly for con-
tinuing together ; for however in former times (while chapmen and
money were plentiful) some have gained by removes, yet in these
latter times it doth not only weaken and discourage the plantation
deserted, but also wastes and consumes the estates of those that
remove. Rolling stones gather no moss in these times, and our
conditions now are not to expect great things. Small things, nay,
moderate things, should content us. A warm fireside, and a peace-
able habitation, with the chief of God's mercies, the gospel of
peace, is no ordinary mercy, though other things were mean. I
intended only one word, but the desire of the common good and
settlement hath drawn me a little further.
" For the consideration Mr. Whitfield told me you were willing
to give me for my purchase, I leave it wholly to yourselves. I
look not to my own profit, but to your comfort. Only one thing
I must entreat you to take notice of, that when I understood that
that land might be useful for your plantation, I did desire to ex-
press my love to Mr. Whitfield and his children, and therefore
offered him to suit his own occasions, which he, more intending
your common advantage than his own particular, hath hitherto
neglected ; yet my desire now is that you would suit him to his
content ; and that he would accept of what shall be allotted him as
a testimony of my love intended to him, before I give up my
interest to your plantation, and that therefore he may hold it free
from charge as I have signified to himself. I will not now trouble
you further, but with my love to yourself and plantation, rest
" Your loving friend and neighbor,
"Saybrook, Oct 22, 1645." " George Fenwick.
Lord Say and Seal, though he had long since reKn-
quished the expectation of removing to America, re-
tained the friendly feeling he had ever cherished toward
the planters of New England, and was in a position,
when Connecticut sought a royal charter, where his
influence was very powerful. Although he had opposed
the tyranny of Charles the First, he was a royalist in
454 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
principle, and disapproved of the extreme measures to
which the popular party were carried by the current of
events. During the commonwealth he lived in retire-
ment, and was among the first to move, when opportu-
nity offered, for the restoration of the ancient constitu-
tion. As a reward for his services, Charles the Second
had made him lord privy seal.
The Earl of Manchester, whom Say and Seal mentions
in his letter to Winthrop, was also a Puritan. He like-
wise, and for similar reasons, was high in office, and
high in favor with the king. Forced to resign his com-
mission as commander-in-chief of one of the grand
divisions of the parliamentary army, by the intrigues
of men who wished to eliminate both royalty and aris-
tocracy from the constitution, he, too, had lived for
years in retirement, waiting for an opportunity to assist
in restoring the ancient form of government. He was
now lord chamberlain, and more active in public affairs
than his aged friend. Say and Seal.
Winthrop himself was singularly well qualified for
the negotiation in which he had engaged. A univer-
sity scholar, he had made the tour of the Continent as
far as to Constantinople before he emigrated to New
England. Gifted by nature, and polished with the best
European culture, he was qualified to converse on those
subjects which were everywhere discussed in society,
and by his experience in America was able to discourse
of a country full of marvels to Englishmen, whether
they had travelled on the Continent or journeyed only
within their native land.
Every thing seemed to favor his undertaking.
Though the colony had no copy of the old patent, one
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER, 45$
was found among the papers of Gov. Hopkins, and
was by his executor delivered to Winthrop. The lord
chamberlain, moved by the lord privy seal, as well as by
his own love to "those that are godly," lent to the
Puritan colony his influence with the king. Mather
relates that Winthrop had a ring which his grandfather
received from King Charles the First, and that the
acceptance by his Majesty of this souvenir of his
father effectually pledged him to favor the suppliant
who offered it.
The new charter was in every respect as Winthrop
would desire it to be. The boundaries of the territory
it confirmed to Connecticut were the same as in the
patent of 1631. "With regard to powers of govern-
ment, the charter was" (says Bancroft) "still more
extraordinary. It conferred on the colonists unquali-
fied power to govern themselves. They were allowed
to elect all their own officers, to enact their own laws,
to administer justice without appeals to England, to
inflict punishments, to confer pardons, and, in a word,
to exercise every power, deliberative and active. The
king, far from reserving a negative on the acts of the
colony, did not even require that the laws should be
transmitted for his inspection ; and no provision was
made for the interference of the English government,
in any event whatever. Connecticut was independent
except in name."
Clearly the terms of the charter were dictated by
Winthrop. Both the boundaries and the powers of
government were such as he asked for. He was re-
solved, when he left Hartford, to ask for all the terri-
tory included by the old patent, even if the line should
reach so as to include a sister colony.
456 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
What, then, was his expectation in regard to the
Jurisdiction of New Haven ? Plainly it was, if we may
trust his own testimony, that New Haven should be at
liberty to join with them or not. Though he had no
intention of absorbing New Haven by compulsion, he
believed that it would be for the advantage of all to
be united in one jurisdiction by mutual agreement.
There were in the colony of New Haven some who
were of the same opinion. Gov. Leete, "both by
speech and letter," urged Winthrop to include New
Haven within the territory he should ask for Connect-
icut. Leete may have been more solicitous for com-
prehension at that time than two or three years later ;
for Winthrop embarked when New Haven was more
apprehensive of the royal displeasure than at any-
other time. Connecticut, in reply to New Haven's
Case Stated, says, " By your then chief in government,
our governor was solicited to include New Haven with-
in our patent, both by speech and letter ; and friends
in England were improved by some of you to persuade
to and promote the same, and, according to your de-
sires, attended the best expedient to express sincerity
of love, your case and condition at tliat time duly con--
sideredy The obvious interpretation of this language
is that Leete desired, in the danger which threatened
New Haven, that she might be allowed to take shelter
under the royal charter which Connecticut hoped to
obtain. Two letters from Leete to Winthrop, found
among the Winthrop papers enclosed in a slip of
paper which was indorsed "Mr. Leete's letter about
procuring patent," still more clearly prove that Leete
desired the comprehension of New Haven, and that he
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER, 457
desired it in order to secure her safety from danger
impending on account of the regicides. The first of
the letters is doubtless that which Connecticut refers
to in her answer to New Haven's Case Stated.' A
few words in this letter are italicised for the conven-
ience of the reader. Under date of Aug. 6, 1 661, he
writes, —
" To the Right Worshipful John Winthrop, Esq,
" Honored Sir, — I waited with expectation to have seen you
at Guilford, or met you at New Haven, to have presented you with
something I had prepared, petition-wise, for the king ; that, if you
had pleased, we might have had your furtherance about it; but
not meeting you, I went toward New London, thinking to find you
there ; but when I came at Saybrook I heard of your being gone
near a week before, and so I was wholly disappointed: since
which time I have sent it to the Council at Boston, as also a letter
of our General Court, signifying our accord to own their address,
and to acknowledge ourselves in like relation and with like affec-
tion to his Majesty.* All which I suppose we should have done
by you, could we have seen you and yours,' and had your consent ;
for we are desirous ever to maintain the stamp of the United
Colonies ; but seeing we were disappointed, we were necessitated
to apply ourselves to the Bay, and are now thither sending this
enclosed letter and petition ; yet, lest any miscarrying or interrup-
tion there should fall out as from them, and for fuller testimony of
us and our loyalty tp his Majesty, I have sent . . . {nonnulla
desunt) , , , and hope it shall not meet with a check from his
' Since writing the above I have noticed that Leete in a letter to Win-
throp, which may be found on p-yyji^ alludes to a letter of similar import
with that here given, which he wrote when Winthrop was in England.
According to Leete, the purport of the letter to England was " to make
your patent a covert, but no control to our jurisdiction, until we accorded
with mutual satisfaction to become one."
* This letter may be found on p. ^ 'i %* ,
* Fitz John and Waitstill, sons of Winthrop, accompanied their father
to Europe.
458 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Majesty. If it should, it would grieve me, but if it find favor, and
herein his Majesty^s clemency shall further shine as toward such
despised ones, it will bring forth (I believe) great cheering and
cordialness, with growth of loyalty ; which I shall seek to further
as I shall be in capacity. Good sir, mind us, and with first oppor-
tunities please to deal upon our account. I have written to the
Bay, that some apt personage may be procured to be the common
agent for New England, to wait upon all turns when any thing pro
or con should be on hand about New England affairs, which I am
informed they think needful also. I wish that you and we could
procure one patent to reach beyond Delaware^ where we have
expended a thousand pounds to procure Indian title, view, and
begin to possess. If war should arise between Holland and
England, it niight suit the king's interest ; a little assistance might
so reduce all to England. But our chief aim is to purchase our
own peace, which I desire we all pursue, as I hope you will, and
for which we pray, as for your health, success, and welfare. With
chief est respects to yourself, Mr. Fitz, and Mr. Wait, wishing your
safe and speedy return to your good family, and us that long for it,
resting
" Yours cordially to love and honor you,
"William Leetb.
" Guilford, Aug. 6 (61).
" Pray, Sir, give us a word of intelligence how matters go,
timely, as may concern us.
" If any thing be needful as to form or emendation in writing,
good Sir, let it be done, and we shall recompense it."
The other letter, enclosed with this by Winthrop for
preservation, was written after Winthrop's return from
Europe. It bears date June 25, 1663, and is as fol-
lows : —
" J^or the honored John Winthrop, Esquire, Governor of Con-
necticut Colony, these dd,
"Much Honored and Dear Sir, — By this first opportunity,
with or indeed somewhat before my meet capacity to write, by rea-
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER. 459
son of extraordinary pain in the one side of my face and teeth, I
have adventured to perform that duty to congratulate your so safe
return, which hath so long been sought, waited, and hoped for, as
the medium to bring a comfortable issue to our perturbing exer-
cises, always giving out my confident apprehensions of your acting
in the Patent business so as to promote peace and love to mutual '
satisfaction, without any intendment to infringe our liberty or
privileges in the least thereby, when you came to manifest your
ingenuous sense of things ; and therefore all my labgring with our
neighbors of Connecticut hath been for a respite of all things till
your return, and that no preparations might be given in that
interim, to hinder a loving accord and compliance between us, which
truly I am and ever have been a friend to encourage, according as
I have said, or at any time written to yourself or Mr. Stone. But
I fear some physicians of our time may be too highly conceited of
curing diseases by violent fomentations, which I ever judged not
to be your method, but rather by gradual ripening and softening
supplements, which I am yet more confirmed to believe since
I see your letter unto Major Mason, a copy whereof Major
Thompson and Mr. Scott sent enclosed (as they say) in one from
them, all which letters have been opened and tossed up and down
about the country in reports, before they came to my view, which
is even now done, and so if any inconvenience be thereby occa-
sioned, I hope you will not impute it unto me. But truly I hear
of great irritations of spirits amongst our people, by reports of
opposite speeches or writings, that are said to come from yourself;
but I hope all will come to a fair reconcilement in due time, and
which I still wait and long for. Thus hoping you will pardon the
want of more ample expressions or other attendance upon you in
time of my long continuing illness, with all humble and best respects
presented to yourself, good Mrs. Winthrop, Mr. Fitz John, Mr.
Wait, and all yours, I take leave, resting
"Your assured loving friend to serve,
"William Leete.
" Guilford, June 25, (63)."
These overtures by Mr. Leete toward an union with
Connecticut were very obnoxious to those who, regard-
460 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
ing the limitation of suffrage to church-members as
of paramount importance, were less alarmed than Mr.
Leete for the safety of themselves and of the colony.
Mr. Davenport writes \o Winthrop, June 22, 1663 : "As
for what Mr. Leete wrote to yourself, it was his private
doing, without the consent or knowledge of any of us
in this colony ; it was not done by him according to his
pubhc trust as governor, but contrary to it." Probably
this movement of Leete for union with Connecticut
was what the letters of Hooke to Davenport and of
Newman to Gilbert, cited in the preceding chapter,
refer to. It does not appear that any public attack
was made upon him; but the little apologetic speech
with which he opened the court of election in the spring,
of 1662 indicates that those who thought that his
proposal to Winthrop to include New Haven was not
done by him according to his public trust as governor,
but contrary to it, had in a private way made it warm
for him. "The governor declared that through the
goodness of God they had been carried through another
year, though with much infirmity and weakness, and
himself more than ordinary, yet not so but through
reflection God had brought him to the sight of it, but
yet was free to be responsible for any public transac-
tion, and should be ready to give answer to any brother
or brethren coming to him in an orderly way, desiring
to find pardon and acceptance with God, and acknowl-
edging their patience and love in passing by any thing
that hath been done amiss. None objecting, they
proceeded to vote."
The charter bore the date, April 23, 1662. It was
first made public in this country at the meeting of the
CONNECTICUT PROCURES A CHARTER. 461
commissioners for the United Colonies at Boston in
September. A letter from the General Court of Con-
necticut to the commissioners, dated Aug. 30, makes
no reference to the charter, but proposes a special meet-
ing of the commissioners " in case any matters needful
to be considered should, at the return of our worthy
governor and the agents for the Massachusetts, be
presented." A letter sent by the commissioners dur-
ing their session, to the governor of Rhode Island says,
"We have read and perused a charter of incorpora-
tion under the broad seal of England, sent over the
last shipy granted to some gentlemen of Connecticut."
For some time after the charter had come into his
possession, Winthrop expected to return home that
summer, and be himself the bearer of the document ;
but, changing his plans, and deciding to spend a sec-
ond winter abroad, he had sent it by another hand.
The arrival of the charter, therefore, preceded the re-
turn of the envoy by whom it was procured. It was
read at the meeting of the commissioners, who " took
notice of his majesty's favor as being very accept-
able to them, and advised that wherein others may
be concerned, the said gentlemen with such others do
attend such ways as may conduce to righteousness,
peace, and amity, and that the favor showed to the
said colony, or any other, may be jointly improved for
the benefit of all concerned in the said charter." In
the margin of that copy of the records of the commis-
sioners printed in Hazard's State Papers is the follow-
ing note : " We cannot as yet say that the procurement
of this patent will be acceptable to us or our colony.
— William Leete, Benjamin Fenn."
462 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
At the General Assembly or Court of Election held
at Hartford, Oct. 9, 1662, —
"The Patent or Charter was this day publicly read in
audience of the freemen, and declared to belong to them and their
successors; and the freemen made choice of Mr. Wyllys, Capt.
John Talcott, and Lieut. John AUyn, to take the charter into
their custody in behalf of the freemen, who are to have an oath
administered to them by the General Assembly for the due dis-
charge of the trust committed to them."
CHAPTER XX.
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUTV
AT the session of the General Court of Connecticut
at which the charter was received, Capt. John
Youngs of Southold appeared, and presented the fol-
lowing certificate, signed by thirty-two persons : —
" Southold, Oct 4, 1663.
" Having notice from Mr. Wyllys of Connecticut Jurisdiction,
Long Island comes within the patent, and also that the Court is to
be held at Hartford, and thither we are desired by Mr. Wyllys to
send our deputies, from these towns of Long Island ; we therefore
of Southold, whose names are underwritten, do desire and have
appointed Capt. John Youngs to be our deputy, and do hereby
give him full power to speak and act in our behalf as occasion
shall serve."
Upon this certificate Capt. Youngs was admitted to
sit as the deputy of Southold, and the following min-
ute was entered on the record : —
" This Court being informed by Capt. John Youngs and some
other gentlemen of quality, that the inhabitants of Southold, the
major part of them, have sent up and empowered him to act as
their deputy, and he as their agent tending to submit their persons
and estates unto this government according to our Charter ; this
Court doth own and accept them, and shall be ready to afford
463
464 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
them protection as occasion shall require, and do advise the said
inhabitants to repair to South and East Hampton, to the authority
there settled by this Court, in case of any necessary occasion, to
require the assistance of authority. And this Court doth hereby
accept and declare Capt John Youngs to be a freeman of this
corporation, and do grant him commission to act in the plantation
of Southold as need requires, according to his commission. And
this Court doth order the inhabitants of Southold to meet together,
to choose a constable for that town ; and Capt. John Youngs is
authorized to administer oath to the said constable, for the due
execution of his office. And we do advise and order Capt. Youngs
to see that the minister be duly paid his meet and competent
maintenance.'* 1
When the magistrates of Connecticut agreed, before
the departure of Winthrop for Europe, that if it should
be found that their boundary included New Haven,
their brethren of that colony should be at liberty to
unite with them or not at their option, they had no
thought of such a temptation as beset them when
Southold applied to be received under their jurisdic-
tion. They were tempted to divide and conquer when
they ought in fairness and good faith, by postponing
action on the proposal of the Southold people, to have
shown courtesy to a sister colony with which they
were confederate. The signers of the application were
probably, as Capt. Youngs alleged, a major part of the
freemen of Southold ; but they were under oath of alle-
giance to New Haven, and in revolting to Connecticut
were acting as individuals and not in a court of the
plantation. Connecticut, after acknowledging New
Haven as a sister colony and becoming confederate
with it, could not justly receive one of its plantations,
even if a general court of the plantation had voted to
F
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 465
change its allegiance. If possible, it was a still greater
outrage to do it in the absence of municipal action.
Having thus robbed New Haven of Southold, the
same General Court proceeded to take under the gov-
ernment and protection of Connecticut a few dis-
affected persons in Guilford, without even pretending
that they were a majority of the inhabitants or of the
freemen. The record reads, —
" Several inhabitants of Guilford tendering themselves, their
persons and estates, under the government and protection of this
colony, this Court doth declare that they do accept and own them
as members of this colony, and shall be ready to a£Eord what pro-
tection is necessary. And this Court doth advise the said persons
to carry peaceably and religiously in their places toward the rest
of the inhabitants that yet have not submitted in like manner.
And also to pay their just dues unto the minister of their town ;
and also all public charges due to this day."
In like manner Stamford and Greenwich were re-
ceived. " This Court doth hereby declare their accept-
ance of the plantations of Stamford and Greenwich
under this government upon the same terms and pro-
visions as are directed and declared to the inhabitants
of Guilford ; and that each of those plantations have
a constable chosen and sworn."
As no disaffected inhabitants of New Haven, Milford,
or Branford appeared, no action was attempted for com-
prehending those plantations further than to appoint
Mr. Matthew Allyn, Mr. Wyllys, Mr. Stone, and Mr.
Hooker a committee "to go down to New Haven to
treat with the gentlemen and others of our loving
friends there, according to such instructions as shall be
directed to the said committee by this Court.**
466 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
About a week later a court of magistrates was held
at New Haven, at which the governor, the deputy-gov-
ernor, Mr. Jones, Mr. Fenn, Mr. Treat, and Mr. Crane
were present. The committee from Connecticut, arriv-
ing in New Haven while the magistrates were in
session, presented a copy of the charter, and with it the
written declaration which may be found below, to the
intent that Connecticut desired • " a happy and com-
fortable union."
In the record of their proceedings the magistrates
make no express mention of the committee or of their
documents ; but " it was agreed and ordered that the
twenty-ninth day of this month be kept a day of ex-
traordinary seeking of God by fasting and prayer for
his guidance of the colony in this weighty business
about joining with Connecticut colony, and for the
afflicted state of the church and people of God in our
native country, and in other parts of the world." But
though no mention is made in the record of the court
of magistrates, of the documents received from Con-
necticut, it subsequently appears that the magistrates
and elders returned a written reply.
At a meeting of the freemen of New Haven colony,
held at New Haven^ Nov. 4, 1662, the governor in-
formed them they were not ignorant of the occasion of
this meeting, they knowing that some gentlemen of
Connecticut had been here, and had left a copy of their
patent, and another writing under their hands, both of
which were now read, and also the answer of our com-
mHtee to their writing, which writing and answer are
as f oUoweth : —
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT, 467
" To our Much Honored and Reverend Friends of New Haven,
Milfordy &*€., to be communicated to all whom it may con-
cern : —
"We declare that through the good providence of the Most
High, a large and ample patent and therein desirable privileges
and immunities from his Majesty, being come to our hands (a
copy whereof we have left with you to be considered), and your-
selves upon the sea-coast being included and interested therein,
the king having united us in one body politic, we according to the
commission wherewith we are intrusted by the General Assembly
of Connecticut do declare in their name that it is both their and
our earnest desire that there may be a happy and comfortable
union between yourselves and us, according to the tenor of the
charter, that inconveniences and dangers may be prevented, and
peace and truth strengthened and established, through our suita-
ble subjection to the terms of the patent, and the good blessing of
God upon us therein. We do desire a seasonable return hereunto.
"Matthew Allyn,
Samuel Wyllys,
Samuel Stone,
Samuel Hooker,
Joseph Fitch."
" To our Much Honored and Reverend Friends, the Commissioners
from the General Court of Connecticut, to be communicated, &*c,
"Much Honored and Reverend, — We have received and
perused your writing, and heard the copy read of his Majesty's
letters patent to Connecticut colony, wherein though we do not
find the colony of New Haven expressly included, yet to show our
desire that matters may be issued in the conserving of peace and
amity with righteousness between them and us, we shall commu-
nicate your writing and the copy of the patent to our freemen,
and afterwards with convenient speed return their answer. Only
we desire that the issuing of matters may be respited until we may
receive fuller information from the Honored Mr. Winthrop or
satisfaction otherwise, and that in the mean time this colony may
remain distinct, entire, and uninterrupted, as heretofore, which we
468 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
hope you will see cause lo\nngly to consent unto, and signify the
same to us with convenient speed.
"WnxiAM Leete,
Matthew Gilbert,
Benjamin Fenn%
Jasper Crane,
Robert Treat,
Wm. Jones,
John Davenport,
Nicholas Street,
Abrah. Pierson,
Roger Newton.
« V
New Haven, 17th of October, 1662/'
" Then the governor told them that they had heard
the writings and patent, and there were two things in
their writing to be answered to : first, that they declare
us to be, by the king, made one body politic with them,
and interested in their patent ; second, they desire a
happy and comfortable union for peace and truth's sake,
&c.: now to these two you must give answer ; and then
dismissed the assembly to consider of it for the space of
one hour and a half, and then to meet again at the beat
of the drum.
"Then, the company being come together in the
afternoon, the governor told them that they knew what
was left with them, for they had heard the patent and
the writings read ; therefore he desired to know their
minds, for he hoped they might have some help from
among ourselves, mentioning Mr. Davenport.
**Then Mr. Davenport, pastor of the church of Christ
at New Haven, said that according to this occasion he
should discharge the duty of his place, and should read
to them his own thoughts (which he had set down in
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 469
writing), which he desired might remain his own till
they were fully satisfied in them, and further said he
should leave others to walk according to the light that
God should give them in this business ; and so read
some reasons why we were not included in the patent,
and also why we might not voluntarily join with them,
and so, upon desire of some, left his writing with them
to consider of.
" Then the governor told them that they had heard
the thoughts of Mr. Davenport concerning both the
parts of the writing, and [he] had left them with them
that they might do that which may be to God's accept-
ance ; therefore he desired them to speak their minds
freely, for he desired that the freemen themselves would
give the substance of the answer voluntarily. The
governor further said that for his part he should not be
forward to lead them in this case, lest any should think
him ambitious of the place, but desired that that might
be done which is according to the will of God. Then,
the matter being largely debated, at last came to this
conclusion, to have an answer drawn up out of these
three heads : first, that there be due witness-bearing
against their sin ; secondly, that there may be a defer-
ring of things till Mr. Winthrop's coming or we [have]
satisfaction otherwise, and that we remain in the same
state as we are till then ; thirdly, that we can do noth-
ing till we consult with the other confederates.
"Then the advice of the commissioners about this
patent was read, and considered how contrary to that
righteousness, amity, and peace, our neighbors of Con-
necticut had carried toward us. Then they considered
of a committee to draw up an answer into form, and to
470 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
annex some weighty arguments thereunto, to send to
the general assembly of Connecticut, and considered
also about making address to his Majesty if our answer
prevail not. The committee appointed was the magis-
trates and elders of this colony in general, with Brother
Law of Stamford, and these to conclude according to
the major part of them in session. It was left with
this committee to send this answer, &c., to what person
they see most convenient, to be communicated to their
general assembly.
"The freemen expressed themselves desirous that the
magistrates would go on in their work, and they looked
upon themselves bound to stand by them according to
our laws here established."
" The answer of the freemen drawn up into form by
the committee, and sent to Connecticut General As-
sembly, is as foUoweth : viz., —
"Honored Gentlemen, — We have heard both the patent and
the writing read, which those gentlemen (who said they were sent
from your General Assembly) left with our committee, and have
considered the contents according to our capacities. By the one
we take notice of their declared sense of the patent and also of
your desire of our uniting with yourselves upon that account. By
the other we understand that his Majesty hath been graciously
pleased (at your earnest petition) to grant liberty to the colony of
Connecticut to acquire, have, possess, and purchase, &c., whatever
lands, &c., you have gained or shall gain by lawful means within
the precincts or lines therein mentioned, and also of his abundant
grace to allow and establish you to be one body politic, for man-
aging all your public affairs and government in a religious and
peaceable manner, to the intents and purposes by his Majesty
and the adventurers therein professed, over all persons, matters,
and things, so gained by purchase or conquest, at your own proper
costs and charges, according as yourselves informed you had
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT. 47 1
already done. Now, whatever is so yours, we have neither pur-
pose nor desire to oppose, hurt, or hinder in the least ; but what
ourselves (by like lawful means) have attained, as to inheritances
or jurisdiction as a distinct colony, upon our most solemn and
religious covenants, so well known to his Majesty and to all, we
must say that we do not find in the patent any command given to
you nor prohibition [permission ?] to us to dissolve covenants or
alter the orderly settlements of New England, nor any sufficient
reason why we may not so remain to be as formerly. Also, your
beginning to procure and proceeding to improve the patent with-
out us doth confirm this belief ; but rather it seems that a way
is left open to us to petition for the like favor, and to enter our
appeal from your declared sense of the patent and signify our
grievances. Yet if it shall appear (after a due and full information
of our state) to have been his Majesty's pleasure so to unite us as
you understand the patent, we must submit according to God ; but
for the present we cannot answer otherwise than our committee
hath done, and likewise to make the same request unto you, that
we may remain distinct as formerly, and may be succored by you
as confederates, at least that none occasion be given by yourselves
for any to disturb us in our ancient settlements until that either by
the Honored Mr. Winthrop, by our other confederates, or from his
Majesty, we may be resolved herein. All which means are in our
thojLights to use, except you prevent, for the gaining of a right
understanding, and to bring a peaceable issue or reconcilement of
this matter ; and we wish you had better considered than to act so
suddenly to seclude us from patent privilege at first if we are
included as you say, and to have so proceeded since, as may seem
to give advantage unto disaffected persons to slight or disregard
oaths and covenants, and thereby to rend and make division,
manage contention and troubles in the townships and societies of
this colony, and that about religious worship, as the enclosed
complaint may declare, which seems to us a great scandal to reli-
gion before the natives, and prejudicial to his Majesty's pious
intention, as also to hold forth a series of means very opposite to
the end pretended, and very much obscured from the beauty of
such a religious and peaceable walking amongst English brethren,
as may either invite the natives to the Christian faith, or unite our
472 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
0
spirits in this juncture, and this occasion given before any convic-
tion tendered or publication of the patent amongst us, or so much
as a treaty with us in a Christian, neighborly way ; no pretence for
our dissolution of government till then could rationally be ima-
gined. Such carriage may seem to be against the advice and mind
of his Majesty in the patent, as also of your honored governor,
and to cast reflection upon him, when we compare these things
with his letters to some here ; for the avoiding whereof we ear-
nestly request that the whole of what he hath written to your-
selves, so far as it may respect us in this business, may be fully
communicated to our view in a true copy or transcript of the same.
We must profess ourselves grieved hereat, and must desire and
expect your effectual endeavors to repair these breaches and
restore us to our former condition as confederates, un^l that by all
or some of these ways intimated we may attain a clear resolution
in this matter. Unto what we have herein propounded we shall
add that we do not in the least intend any dislike to his Majest^-'s
act, but to show our sense of your actings first and last, so much
to our detriment, and to manifest the consequent effects to God's
dishonor, as also to give you to know how we understand the
patent, hoping that you will both candidly construe and friendly
comply with our desires herein, and so remove the cause of our
distraction and sad affliction that you have brought upon this |X)or
colony : then shall we forbear to give you further trouble, and shall
pray to the God of spirits to grant us all humility, and to guide us
with his heavenly wisdom to a happy issue of this affair in love
and peace : resting, gentlemen, your very loving friends and neigh-
bors, the freemen of the Colony of New Haven.
''W James Bishop, Secretary^
** In the name and by order and consent of the Committee
and freemen of New Haven Colony,
^^ Postscript, — We have also thought fit to send our reasons en-
closed, which are the ground of this answer we return, and desire
the whole may be read and communicated to the General Assem-
bly, entreating an answer with all convenient speed, or from the
committee if so empowered."
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 473
Four days previous to this Court of the Jurisdiction,
there had been a general plantation court at New
Haven, when, after Deputy-Gov. Gilbert had read the
charter, the written declaration of the committee from
Connecticut, and the reply of the magistrates and
elders, " Mr. John Davenport, pastor of the church of
Christ at New Haven, declared unto the town that he
wrote to Mr. Winthrop, before he went to England, not
to have any hand in such an unrighteous act as to
involve us in their patent. To which he wrote to him
in two letters, one from Mattabesick and another from
the Manhatoes at his going away, part of which was
read, wherein he expressed his contrary purpose and
the expressions of some other of their magistrates to
the same purpose. And also Mr. Davenport presented
a letter, which he received the last night from Mr.
Richard Law of Stamford, and read it to the town,
wherein was intimated their sad state by reason of the
turbulent carriages of some of their inhabitants which
Connecticut colony had admitted and so dismembered
us, and some would say they were rebels against the
king and the jurisdiction of Connecticut. Also he
further informed the town of the treaty they had with
those gentlemen of Connecticut aforesaid, and how
they had showed them the wrong they had done us, in
dismembering of us at Stamford, Guilford, and South-
old, and all this before they had consulted with us,
and showed them their evil therein, but received no
satisfaction from them about it.
" Mr. Davenport also propounded sundry reasons to
be considered, both why we were not included in Con-
necticut patent, and also why we may not voluntarily
474 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
join with them, with some directions what answer to re-
turn, that so they may see their evil in what they have
done, and restore us to our former state, that so we and
they may live together in unity and amity for the future.
" The Deputy-Governor declared that the things
spoken by Mr. Davenport were of great weight, and he
desired all present would seriously consider of them.
" Mr. Street, teacher of the church of Christ at New
Haven, declared that he looked upon the reasons pro-
pounded by Mr. Davenport to be imanswerable, and
that both church and town had cause to bless God for
the wisdom held forth in them, and wished them to
keep the ends and rules of Christ in their eye, and then
God would stand by them ; and did second the direc-
tions given, with one Scripture out of Isa. xiv. 32, and
from thence did advise that our answers should be of
faith and influenced with faith, and not of fear.
"The matter was largely debated, and sundry ex-
pressed themselves as disliking the proceedings of Con-
necticut in this business, as Lieut. Nash, Mr. Tuttle,
Mr. Powell, &c., and desired some answer might be
given that way, with a desire of restoring us to our
former state again, and then by general vote declared
their disapproving of the manner of Connecticut colo-
ny's proceeding in this business."
There being no meeting of the General Court of
Connecticut till the following spring, and their com-
mittee returning no written reply to the communica-
tion from New Haven, though, in a personal inter\'iew
as is intimated in New Haven's Case Stated, they sig-
nified their persistence in their " own will and way,"
New Haven through its committee forwarded an
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 475
appeal to his Majesty, but advised their friends in
London who served them in the business, to communi-
cate their papers first to Winthrop, that if possible the
difference between the colonies might be settled with-
out further recourse. Accordingly the papers were
shown to Winthrop, and he stopped the proceeding of
the appeal to the king by engaging that Connecticut
should cease its injurious treatment of New Haven.
In fulfilment of that engagement he wrote a letter
dated March 3, i66§, to Major Mason, Deputy-Gov-
ernor of Connecticut and, in the absence of Winthrop,
its acting governor, to be communicated to the other
magistrates, which is as follows : —
" Gentlemen, — I am informed by some gentlemen who are
authorized to seek remedy here, that since you had the late patent,
there hath been injury done to the government of New Haven,
and in particular at Guilford and Stamford in admitting several of
the inhabitants there unto freedom with you, and appointing offi-
cers, which hath caused division in said towns, which may prove of
dangerous consequence if not timely prevented, though I do hope
the rise of it is from misunderstanding, and not in design of
prejudice to that colony, for whom I gave assurance to their
friends that their rights and interests should not be disquieted or
prejudiced by the patent. But if both governments would with
unanimous agreement unite in one, their friends judged it would
be for advantage to both ; and further I must let you know that
testimony here doth affirm that I gave assurance before authority
here, that it was not intended to meddle with any town or planta-
tion that was settled under any other government Had it been
any otherwise intended or declared, it had been injurious, in taking
out the patent, not to have inserted a proportionable number of
their names in it. Now upon the whole, having had serious con-
ference with their friends authorized by them, and with others who
are friends to both, to prevent a tedious and chargeable trial and
uncertain event here, I promised them to give you speedily this
476 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
representation, how far you are engaged, if any injury hath been
done by admitting of freemen, or appointing officers, or any other
unjust intermeddling with New Haven Colony in one kind or other
without the approbation of the government, that it be forthwith
recalled, and that for future there will be no imposing in any
kind upon them, nor admitting of any members without mutual
consent ; but that all things be acted as loving, neighboring
colonies, as before such patent granted. And unto this I judge
you are obliged, I having engaged to their agents here that this
w^ill be by you performed, and they have thereupon forborne to give
you or me any trouble. But they do not doubt but upon future
consideration there may be such a right understanding between
both governments that an union and friendly joining ,^y be estab-
lished to the satisfaction of all, which at my arrival I shall also
endeavor (God ^nlling) to promote. Not having more at present
in this case, I rest
" Your humble servant,
"John Winthrop.
" For Major yohn Mason, Deputy^ovemor of Contucticut Colony^
and the rest of the Court there at Hartford^ dd^^
This letter, or a copy of it in Winthrop's handwrit-
ing, was by him delivered to the agents of the New
Haven Colony, and by them sent to Gov. Leete. A
year after the date thereof, the Connecticut committee
allege that it had never been seen by Major Mason or
themselves, and intimate that it was sent to Guilford to
be forwarded to Hartford. Gov. Leete evidently had
regarded it as a copy sent to him to inform him how
the negotiation stood between the agents who acted
for the two colonies in London. Winthrop's letter was
so satisfactory to the agents of New Haven (as is evi-
dent from the letter itself) that they did not proceed
with the intended appeal to the king. When received
by Leete, it was equally satisfactory to the magistrates
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT, 477
and elders who were in charge of New Haven's case.
The letter, being dated March 3, reached New Haven
not many weeks before Winthrop's arrival in June.
At a general assembly, held at Hartford in March,
i66§, the Court "voted and desired the deputy-gov-
ernor, Mr. Matthew Allyn, Capt. John Talcott, and
Lieut. John Allyn, and for a reserve to the major,
Mr. Wyllys, as a committee to go down to New Haven
to treat with our honored and loving friends about
their union and incorporation with this colony of Con-
necticut. And in case the committee cannot effect a
union according to instructions given them by the
Court, that then they endeavor to settle a peace in the
plantations until such time as they and we may be in a
further capacity of issuing this difference, and to act in
reference hereunto as they judge most meet." Another
order was " that in case the committee do not issue an
agreement with New Haven gentlemen according to
their instructions, before their return, that then all
propositions and instructions from the Court, respect-
ing union with that people, are void and of none
effect."
Three of this committee were in New Haven a few
days afterward, where they made the following commu-
nication : —
" Some Proposals to the Gentlemen of New Haven^ &*c,j in refer-
ence to their Firm Settlement and Incorporation with us of
Connecticut : —
" I. We shall in no wise infringe or disturb them in their order
of church government, provided we remain free from any imposi-
tions from the supreme powers of England.
"2. That those who have been of the magistracy in New
478 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
Haven Colony shall be invested with full power to govern the
people within those limits until our Gener^ Assembly in May
next
" 3. That there shall yearly be nominated to election a proper^
tionable number of assistants in the plantations of New Haven,
Milford, Branford, and Guilford, as shaU be for the rest of the
plantations in our colony.
" 4. That those who have been freemen of New Haven colony
shall be forthwith admitted freemen of our corporation, unless any
person be justly excepted against unto us.
" 5. That New Haven, Milford, Branford, Guilford, shaU be a
distinct county wherein there shall be chosen yearly such civil
officers as may carry on all causes of judicature amongst them-
selves which extend not to life, limb, or banishment.
"6. That there shall be, once a year at the least, a court of
assistants at New Haven to prevent unnecessary trouble and
expense to those that do appeal from the sentence of the former
court, and to hear and determine all matters that respect life, limb,
and banishment.
" 7. That each of the forementioned towns shall have liberty
to send two of their freemen as deputies to our next General
Assembly.
" 8. Whatever privileges else you shall propound consonant to
the tenor of our charter, we shall be ready to attend you therein.
**9. That, in case these our proposals be not accepted before
our departure, then they are to be void and of no effect
"Math. Allyn,
Sam. Wyllys,
John Allyn.
*' New Haven, March 20, '6|.*»
The answer of New Haven to these proposals, in the
handwriting of William Jones, is as follows : —
" Whereas we discern by the order of the General Court of
Connecticut, dated March the nth, i66|, that the gendemen their
committee were limited to conclude at this present meeting with
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 479
us, otherwise their power ceases ; our answer in general is that we
are not in a capacity so to do : —
" I. First, because we are under an appeal to the king where-
unto i^e do adhere, and therefore cannot act contrarily without
dishonor to his Majesty, and prejudice to our own right until his
royal determination be known in the question depending between
us.
*' 2. Because we cannot in conscience conclude to dissolve our
distinct colony by uniting with Connecticut without the express
consent of the other colonies declared from their general courts
respectively.
"3. Because we are limited by our freemen not to conclude
any thing for altering our distinct colony state and government
without their consent.
" Yet shall we, in order to an issue betwixt us with love and
peace, which we desire them by all loving carriages to promo ve
in the interim of our deliberation, consider of their propositions
and communicate them to our freemen, as we may have a conven-
ient opportunity.
" But whereas we observe in their propositions that Stamford is
left out, as if it were no member of us, we must and do profess
ourselves unsatisfied with that omission, because we apprehend
ourselves bound to seek and provide for their liberties and com-
forts as our own.
"William Leete,
" In the name of our Committee,
** New Haven, 20th of ist mo. (ff )•"
On the 6th of May a general court for the jurisdic-
tion was held at New Haven, when "the governor
informed the Court of the state of things in reference
to Connecticut, and how the committee had acted ; and
the proposals of the gentlemen of Connecticut were
read with the answer of our committee.
"It was propounded whether we should make any
alteration of the usual time of our election, we standing
480 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
in the state we do and waiting for an answer to our
appeal. After debate, it was concluded as best to go
on with our election as formerly, and make no altera-
tion, but stand in the same state we were when we made
an appeal, and, if any thing should come from Con-
necticut by way of prohibition, then to have a protest
ready to witness against them, we being under an appeal
to his Majesty.
" It was also propounded, whether we should not send
up a remonstrance of our grievances by their unsuita-
ble carriages towards us in the state wherein we are,
it being a question whether the general assembly of
Connecticut is rightly informed of our state ; a draft
whereof (being prepared) was read and well approved
for the substance of it and, after debate upon it, was
by vote concluded to be sent, only with alteration of
some passages therein, which was done and sent to
Major John Mason, that by him it might be communi-
cated to their general assembly." *
In accordance with the resolution recited above, the
annual election was held on the 29th of May, when the
officers chosen " all took oath for the year ensuing, or
until our foundation settlements be made null." On
the same day a general court for the jurisdiction was
held, at which the governor told the court that they
knew how we stood in reference to Connecticut Colony,
and that there was a committee appointed for the last
year: therefore propounded, whether they would em-
power the same again ; which being voted, it was con-
cluded both for the same persons and the same power
as the last year."
' The remonstrance may be found in Appendix No. VI.
. CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 48 1
Gov. Winthrop arrived not long afterward from
Europe. The New Haven people were earnestly desir-
ing his arrival, hoping that he would, in accordance with
the spirit of the letter he had written to Major Mason
and the other magistrates of Connecticut, " come with
an olive-branch." The earliest intimation of his being
in Hartford is in a letter to him from Davenport, who
writes : —
" To the Right Worshipful John Winthrop, Esquire, Governor of
Connecticut, these present at Hartford,
" Honored Sir, — These are to congratulate your safe arrival
and return to your family, where you have been ardently desired
and long expected. Blessed be our good God, in Jesus Christ,
who hath, at last, mercifully brought you off from court-snares and
London-tumults and European troubles, and from all perils at sea,
and hath preserved your precious life and health, and hath carried
yourself, with your two sons, as upon eagles' wings, above the
reach of all hurtful dangers, unto your habitation, and hath kept
your dear wife and all your children alive, and made them joyful
by your safe and comfortable return unto them. Together with
them, I also, and my wife and son and daughter, rejoice herein,
as in a gracious answer of many prayers, and in persuasion that
you are come with an olive-branch in your mouth ; according to
the encouragement and assurance which I have received in some
letters to myself from Captain Scott and from Mr. Halstead ; and
from one sent to Mr. Leete, which is either the protograph or a
copy of your letter to Major Mason, which seems to be written
by yourself, but the seal was broken open before it came hither.
Whether he hath that letter from Major Thompson, which you
mention, or not, I know not. But I hear he hath one from Mr.
Whitfield, the contents whereof I have not heard. Sir, give me
leave to take notice of one passage in yours [that there is nothing
but misunderstanding that could occasion such apprehensions of
any injury done to New Haven or their concernments ; and those
friends above mentioned wfere fully satisfied thereof, and wondered
482 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
much that it was not better understodd by yours\ It was written
in the line, them; that being blotted out, it is interlined, ^^wrjy
which makes the sense of the whole very dark to me. For if, by
yours^ be meant our committee of magistrates, elders, and depu-
ties, intrusted by the freemen of this colony to treat with our
friends of Connecticut, I shall wonder at their wondering. For: i.
That manifest injury is done to this colony, is proved by instances
in the writings sent to Connecticut and to England. 2. Nor did
we misunderstand the patent, but saw and pleaded that New
Haven Colony is not mentioned therein, and that it was not the
King's purpose, nor yours, to destroy the distinction of colonies,
nor our colony-state ; and, in that confidence, desired that all things
might stand, in statu quo firiuSy till your return ; which, when we
could not obtain, we were compelled to appeal to the King ; yet,
out of tender respect to your peace and honor, advised, as you
know, our friends to consult with you before they prosecuted our
appeal or delivered my letter to my lord chamberlain. Our friends
at Connecticut regarded not our argumenfs, which yet, I know, are
pleadable and would bear due weight in the Chancery and at the
Council Table, and one of them yourself is pleased to establish in
your letter to Major Mason. 3. Nor is it to be wondered at, if we
had misunderstood the things which we wanted means to under-
stand from yourself ; who neither in your letter to me from Lon-
don, dated May 13, 1662, which I received by Mr. Ling, nor in
your next, dated March the 7th this year, signified to me any other
thing than that New Haven is still a distinct colony, notwithstand-
ing the Connecticut patent. I do the more insist on this, because
I am told that Mr. Stone, in a letter which he sent unto one in
Fairfield {ni fallor\ saith that he had received a letter from Mr.
Winthrop, who wondereth that New Haven do question their be-
ing under Connecticut, or to that purpose; which is understood
as concluding the dissolution of this colony, which, I perceive by
what yourself and others have written, is a misunderstanding of
your meaning, so that the misunderstanding is to be wondered at
in them, not in us. As for what Mr. Leete wrote to yourself, it
was his private doing, without the consent or knowledge of any of
us in this colony ; it was not done by him according to his public
trust as governor, but contrary to it. If they had treated with us,
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT, 483
or should yet, as with a distinct colony, we should readily agree
with them in any rational and equal terms, for the settling of
neighborly peace and brotherly amity between them and us, mutu-
ally, who have already, as you see, patiently suffered wrong, for
peace's sake, in hope of a just redress, at your return into these
parts. * I would not have mentioned these matters in this letter,
(which I intended only for a supply of my want of bodily fitness
for a journey to Hartford, to give you a personal visit, in testimony
of my joy for your safe arrival and return), but that the expression
'forenoted compelled me to speak something to it. I long to see
your face, and am in hope that shortly, after your first hurries are
ovei', we shall enjoy your much-desired presence with us in your
chamber at my house, which shall be as your own while it is mine.
Then we may have opportunity, by the will of God, to confer
placidly together, and to give and receive mutual satisfaction,
through a right understanding of what is done in our concern-
ments. Myself, my wife, my son and daughter, do jointly and
severally present our humble service to your honored self and Mrs.
Winthrop, with our respectful and affectionate salutations to your
two sons and to all your daughters, praying that blessings from
heaven may be multiplied upon you and them, through Jesus
Christ, in whom I rest. Honored Sir,
" Yours, obliged to honor and serve you in the Lord,
"John Davenport.
" N. H., the 22d day of the 4th month, called June, 1663."
Gov. Leete's letter to Winthrop congratulating him
on his safe return and expressing confidence that he
would be a medium to bring the strife between the
colonies to a comfortable issue, has been given in the
preceding chapter. That the New Haven people were
disappointed in their hope that through Winthrop's
influence Connecticut would reverse its action, will
appear in the sequel ; but Winthrop's reasons for disap-
pointing them are not on record. A cloud of mystery
envelops the matter, and we can only exhibit the facts.
484 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
That Leete and some others of the New Haven com-
mittee began very soon to doubt whether things would
come to a comfortable issue by means of Winthrop,
appears in a letter which Leete wrote to Winthrop on
the 20th of July : —
" For the Right Worshipful John Winthrop^ Esquire^ Gov-
ernor of Connecticut Colony^ at Hartford, These : —
" Much Honored Sir, — In my last I informed you of your
very acceptable letter sent us by Major Thompson and Mr. Scott
jointly attesting it ; the purport whereof suited well with minie to
you in England, to make your patent a covert, but no control
to our jurisdiction, until we accorded with mutual satisfaction to
become one, which I have been and still am a friend to promove in
a righteous and amicable way. But truly, I think, a just expedient
hath not hitherto been seasonably attended to accomplish the
same ; but rather that which hath irritated, and so conduced to the
contrary; which to behold hath been a grief to some. [It hath
been a grief] to see the strings of the instrument so stretched as
to make it untunable to play in consort, the chief music which I
delight to hear, especially in jarring times ; and therefore hoped
and longed to see it taken into the hand of a more knowing artist,
and one apt and inclined to make uniting and composing melody,
as (in my understanding) was sweetly begun to be sounded in the
language of your letter. But as yet we find not such harmonious
effects to ensue in a practical way as were to be wished for.
Wherefore I am desired by our committee, or some of them, to
write unto yourself, earnestly entreating that you would please
to send us a plain, positive, and particular answer in writing to this
question, viz., whether the contents of that your letter aforesaid
shall be performed to us or no, according to the genuine sense
thereof. Good sir, be pleased that either your own or your com-
mittee's answer may be sent us by Mr. Pierson, who intends to
visit and wait upon you for the same, as I also should have done,
had not something more than ordinary interrupted, together with
some hopes we might enjoy your presence here, before your go-
ing into the Bay, as was intimated to us. So with many thanks
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 48$
•
and chiefest respects presented from myself and wife unto you all,
acknowledging our great engagements for your love and sympathy
in your last expressed, I take leave, and remain
" Your cordial friend and servant,
"William Leete.
"GoiLFORD, July 20, 1663."
" Sir, — Hearing that you sought for your own copy but could
not find it when Mr. Jones and Mr. John Davenport were with you,
I have here inclosed sent a true copy of your letter as it came to
my hands."
From the letter and its postscript we may infer that
two of the committee had conferred with Winthrop in
a personal interview, and that upon their report Leete
doubted whether Winthrop would abide by the agree-
ment he had made in London with Major Thompson
and Mr. Scott acting in behalf of New Haven.
On the 19th of August, there was a session of the
General Assembly of Connecticut at Hartford, but
there is nothing in the record to show* that the gov-
ernor was present. Action was taken concerning New
Haven as follows : viz., " This court doth nominate and
appoint the deputy-governor, Mr. Wyllys, Mr. Daniel
Clark, and John Allyn, or any three or two of them, to
be a committee to treat with our honored friends of
New Haven, Milford, Branford, and Guilford, about
settling their union and incorporation with this colony
of Connecticut ; and they are empowered to act accord-
ing to the instructions given to the committee sent to
New Haven in March last ; and, in case they cannot
effect a union, they are hereby authorized publicly to
declare unto them that this Assembly cannot well
resent ' their proceeding in civil government as a dis-
' Resent^ to feel back in return ; to think over.
486 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
tinct jurisdiction, being included within the charter
granted to Connecticut corporation ; and likewise they
are publicly to declare that this Assembly doth desire
and cannot but expect that the inhabitants of New
Haven, Milford, Branford, Guilford, and Stamford, do
yield subjection to the government here established
according to the tenor of our charter, which is publicly
to be read in New Haven." On the 26th of the same
month, three of this committee, Messrs. Wyllys, Clark,
and Allyn, were in New Haven, where they renewed
the proposals made -by Connecticut in March. The
New Haven committee responded by sending the fol-
lowing communication in the handwriting of William
Jones : — /
"NEW HAVEN COMMITTEE'S PROPOSALS, AUG. 26, 1663.
" To the Honored Committee from the General Assembly of Con-
ticut, Mr, Wyllys, Mr, Clark, and Mr, Allyn,
" Gentlemen, — In order to a friendly treaty and amicable
composure of matters in difference between us, we earnestly
desire you would restore us to our entire colony state by dis-
claiming that party at Guilford and Stamford ; and so doing, we
offer the following queries to your consideration, as matter for
such treaty : viz., —
"I. Whether the fundamental laws for government, especially
that touching the qualifications of freemen, shall be the same
with Boston or ours, (i.e.) members of some one or other of our
churches.
^" 2. Whether our church order and privileges shall not be
infringed nor disturbed, and that both the choice and calling in of
ministers in each plantation be established a church right forever.
^"3. Whether all our present freemen shall be forthwith ad-
mitted and empowered to act as your own freemen to all intents
and purposes.
V*'4. Whether any of our former adjudications in our distinct
colony state shall be liable to appeals or be called in question.
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 487
^, Whether we shall be immediately established a distinct
county, and to have so many magistrates as necessary, four at
least, with a president chosen yearly by our own county court,
together with other inferior officers to be nominated by ourselves.
^* 6. Whether any appeals shaU be at any time allowed from our
county court in ordinary cases, unless to our own court of assist-
ants, and that upon weighty grounds and with good caution, to
prevent trouble and charge to the county.
^. Whether there shall not be a court of assistants at New
Haven yearly, or oftener if need require, to try capital causes and
hear such appeals, consisting of our own and such other magis-
trates as we shall desire by order from our president.
^* 8. Whether all our present magistrates and officers shall
remain in full power to govern the people as formerly, until new be
orderly chosen at the next election court after this agreement.
" 9. Whether all rates and public charges granted or levied or
due in each colony before this agreement, be paid and discharged
by the inhabitants proportionably in a distinct way, and not other-
wise.
" 10. Whether at the next election there shall be a committee
chosen and appointed of your and our ablest ministers and other
freemen, to consult and prepare a body of laws out of your and
our laws most consonant to Scripture.
"II. Whether until such a body of laws be framed and agreed
upon anew mutually, all matters in our towns and courts shall be
issued and done according to our own laws as formerly.
" 12. Whether all our plantations according to their anciently
reputed and received bounds shall not so remain unalterably, but
receive confirmation by authority of the patent.
" That such treaty shall not be binding to us without consent of
our confederates and general court of freemen.
"Whether the freemen in each of our towns may not make
orders for the town afEairs.
" These imperfect queries we at present offer to your considera-
tion, reserving liberty to propound what further we shall see need-
ful, allowed by the patent
" William Leete,
" In the name and with consent of the committee^
'T''?., '"~!'— " ITT
u±.
!T^ l!b xCD 5.
x ^xhIddtt. :r 5
v--;ir-* r-.e ^r^.iyns-r- in^i -rxin-irr* ir :ur s:ir-3 r:ii*T
-^^ ■",-' v- ly. »» -.Ar.:-j--c TUT] a :'ir ±iriir, scr dint w« admit
''/f >• * / / ^''^^-^r^^ri^i. j-ir aj fr.a ±,^. tizuir :her*-:t. be: wiiat Laws
r..* I A '•/,■'.*' ,rr r.^' '.-.i*r*Tr:J: inr: :.'cd:Liniie :o the pcblic weal of
f- >t' '. AT A v^f^, vt kr* r*a/:T y-j rrint tie establishment thereof:
.»f»/] ;/»'*i^'#;;ifIy fr/r r^^l.f^jkZifjT. of freenien we are ready to grant
fr^»* *t,*y *h/#i| ^/^ men f>f a re;;;^Ioas carriaije, visibly so, having
/rf,/| jf//<«;^«t%if,;/ ^/me (Jtrnptlnucr/ of estate, and shall bring a cer-
f »^/ ,♦>'• ,iffirtt,;ti'ivf ih'Ai they are thus qualified from the deacons of
iht- t\intfU ^tn] two of the Jiclcctmcn of the town where they live.
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 489
and, if there be no deacons, then some other known and approved
persons with the selectmen as before.
^ " 2. That the church order and privileges within these plan-
tations, New Haven, Milford, Branford, Guilford, and Stamford,
shall not be infringed or disturbed by us, or any from us, and that
the choice and call of the church-officers in each plantation shall
remain a church-right forever.
«^"3. That upon our and your union all the present freemen
within these plantations shall be forthwith invested with full
power to be and act as freemen of Connecticut corporation in all
concerns.
I ** 4. That all former transactions in courts and administrations
as a distinct jurisdiction shall be totally freed from future callings
into question in the Court at Connecticut or elsewhere within our
precincts, unless any thing controversial be at present dependent in
the Court here.
"5. That the plantations forementioned be immediately upon
our union established a distinct county, and to have so many offi-
cers as may be sufficient to carry on matters of civil judicature as
a county, and shall have power to try and issue all cases according
to the tenor of our charter, provided that such cases as respect
life, limb, banishment, or total confiscation, shall be issued by a
court of assistants, which shall be once a year, or oftener if any
thing extraordinary fall out within any of these plantations neces-
sitating the same, which court of assistants shall consist of such as
are chosen and ordained yearly for these plantations, whereof one
shall be the president of the county or moderator of the courts
kept in this county, and chosen to that place by the civil officers
that attend the county courts ; unto which officers for the consti-
tuting of the court of assistants shall be added three assistants out
of the corporation such as shall be yearly appointed thereunto by
the General Assembly held in May, and such as are grieved at the
sentence of the county court shall have liberty upon good caution
to appeal to the court of assistants ; and that all cases tried by this
court or the county court dependent twixt party and party respect-
ing damage to the sum of forty shillings or upwards, and likewise
capital crimes and offences, shall be tried by a jury either of six
or twelve freemen, according as the nature of the case require, but
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 49 1
sioners, deputies, and constables. As for selectmen who are to
order the civil, prudential afiairs of the respective towns, they to
be yearly chosen by a major vote of the approved inhabitants, with
other necessary town officers in your respective places in this
county.
** 12. That all public charges and levies, due for time past and
until this instant, shall be defrayed by the respective towns in this
county as formerly, and for those several persons within this county
that have subjected to Connecticut government, that they shall
also be rated after the sum of a penny per pound for their ratable
estates, with the rest of the inhabitants in their respective towns
as before expressed.
" Unto these proposals we whose names are subscribed desire a
return from the honored committee, whether you are willing to
accept of them, to the settlement of your union with our corpo-
ration.
"Samuel Wyllys,
Daniel Clark,
John Allyn.
" New Haven, 27 August, 1663."
The negotiation between the colonies was at this
time in a dead-lock ; New Haven refusing to submit, or
even negotiate, unless Connecticut would " first restore
us to our right state again," and Connecticut ofifering
nothing more than "to retract those commissions that
have been given to any persons that have been settled
in public employ either at Guilford or Stamford." New
Haven insisted that Connecticut should not only re-
tract these commissions, but, by two other retractions,
disclaim those who had revolted from New Haven to
Connecticut, and admit that New Haven was a distinct
colony. In September, the controversy was brought
before the commissioners of the United Colonies on
the following complaint : —
492 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
" The Complaint of the Commissioners of New Haven, in behalf
of that Colony, humbly presented to the rest of the Honored Com'
miss toners, for their Advice, Aid, and Succor, as followeth : —
"Viz., that sundry of the inhabitants of several of our towns
have been taken under the government of Connecticut, and by
them encouraged to disown our authority. They refuse to observe
their oaths of fidelity', to attend our courts or meetings called by
our authority, or to perform other duties with the rest of our
people, and so our settled order and peace is much prejudiced.
2. " That constables or officers are, by Connecticut's authority,
appointed and set up amongst us, who are very troublesome to us.
These things and the sad consequences thereof are so aggrieving
to the generality of our people, and like to bring forth such uncom-
fortable effects, that we cannot but present the matter to your
serious consideration, to take some effectual course that such
actings may be recalled and forborne, and the articles of confeder-
ation duly observed towards us, a distinct colony, your observant
confederates.
"In the name of the Colony of New Haven.
"William Leete.
Benjamin Fenn.
"Boston, 17th September, 1663.'*
^^ An Answer to New Haven Gentlemen,
" The commissioners for Connecticut do conceive that there is
no such cause of complaint at present from New Haven as hath
been mentioned in their paper, there having been divers friendly
treaties about the matters in difference, and very amicable propo-
sitions and tenders formerly, and now again very lately, pro-
pounded by a committee from the court of Connecticut, who had
of late a friendly conference upon it with the committee of New
Haven, and a copy of those propositions was presented now by
Mr. Wyllys, one of the magistrates and one of the said committee
of Connecticut, and the said amicable propositions were now read
to all the commissioners, and not disliked by them; and we hope
they are yet in a fair way of further treaty toward a friendly com-
pliance, and are assured that the court at Connecticut did never
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT, 493
intend to do, nor will do, any injury or wrong to them, but will be
ready, to attend all just and friendly ways of love and correspond-
ence; and, whatever hath been now suggested by way of com-
plaint, we doubt not but they will return a fair and satisfactory
answer to them when they have notice thereof.
"John Winthrop.
John Talcott.
^'Sbptbmber 17, 1663."
New Haven V Reply,
"The commissioners of New Haven Colony cannot approve
of the answer or apology of Connecticut commissioners, in saying
that they conceive there is no ground for our complaint, the case
being as related, and can prove nothing being done to reverse or
satisfy upon that account, or promised but conditionally and in
treaty only, wherein we have and do desire to carry as amicably
towards them as they towards ns ; but how it should be said that
the court of Connecticut neither intended nor would do us any
wrong, while such injuries as are complained of are not righted,
nor yet absolutely promised so to be, we see not, and therefore
cannot but desire the sense of the commissioners upon the acting
complained of, while it is not known how far those propositions
mentioned will be satisfactory to our people, nor what issue will
be attained for settlement of affairs according to confederation (in
case), which we still cleave unto. " William Leete.
Benjamin Fenn."
" The Answer of the Massachusetts and Plymouth to the Com-
plaint of New Haven is as followeth : —
" The commissioners of the Massachusetts and Plymouth, hav-
ing considered the complaint exhibited by New Haven against Con-
necticut for infringing their power of jurisdiction, as in the said
complaint is more particularly expressed, together with the answer
returned thereto by Connecticut commissioners, with some other
debates and conferences that have passed between them, do judge
meet to declare, that the said colony of New Haven being owned
in the Articles of Confederation as distinct from Connecticut, and
494 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
having been so owned by the colonies jointly in this present meet-
ing in all their actings, may not by any act of violence have their
liberty of jurisdiction infringed by any other of the United Colonies,
without breach of the Articles of Confederation, and that where
any act of power hath been exerted against their authority, that
the same ought to be recalled, and their power reserved to them
entire, until such time as in an orderly way it shall be otherwise
disposed; and for particular grievances mentioned in their com-
plaint, that they be referred to the next meeting of the commis-
sioners at Hartford, where Connecticut, having timely notice, may
give their answer thereto, unless in the. mean time there be an
amicable uniting for the establishment of their peace, the which
we are persuaded will be very acceptable to the* neighboring
colonies.
" Simon Bradstreet, President,
Thomas Danforth.
Thomas Prince.
JOSIAH WiNSLOW."
By this time Winthrop, as appears from his signa-
ture to one of the above documents, had shown that he
accorded with the other leading men of Connecticut in
their policy toward New Haven. He doubtless feared
that if Connecticut, following the advice which he sent
from London, should fully and unconditionally retract
what she had done, and acknowledge New Haven as a
distinct colony, the party of which Davenport and
Gilbert were leaders would be able to prevent the
success of any negotiations for union under one gov-
ernment. For the sake of the common good he repu-
diated the engagement he had made, and joined in the
effort to force New Haven into submission. He shows,
however, the reluctance of a noble mind to do so mean
an act, keeping himself in the background, avoiding
appointment on the committees successively sent to
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 495
New Haven, and absenting himself from the court
when on the 8th of October the following action was
taken in regard to New Haven : —
" This court doth declare that they can do no less for their own
indemnity than to manifest our dissatisfaction with the proceedings
of the plantations of New Haven, Milford, Branford, &c., in their
distinct standing from us in point of government ; it being directly
opposite to the tenor of the charter lately granted to our colony of
Connecticut, in which charter these plantations are included. We
also do expect their submission to our government, according to
our charter and his Majesty's pleasure therein expressed ; it being
a stated conclusion of the Commissioners that jurisdiction right
always goelh with patent And whereas, the aforesaid people of
New Haven, &c., pretend they have power of government distinct
from us, and have made several complaints of wrongs received
from us, we do hereby declare that our Council will be ready to
attend them, or a committee of theirs, and if they can rationally
make it appear that they have such power, and that we have
wronged them according to their complaints, we shall be ready to
attend them with due satisfaction. (The Governor absent when
this vote passed.) The Court appoints Mr. Wyllys and the Secre-
tary to draw up a letter to the New Haven gentlemen, and inclose
this act of the court in it")
This action of the General Assembly was probably
taken after the receipt of, and with reference to, the
contents of the following communication from the New
Haven committee : —
"Honored Gentlemen, — Seeing that it hath pleased the
Almighty who is our defence, at this session of the Commission-
ers, not to suffer any mine to spring for subverting that ancient
wall of New England's safety, which Himself hath erected upon
the foundation of our so solemn and religious confederation, but
further unanimously to establish the same, we thought it might not
be unacceptable on our part to present you with our request at this
season of your General Assembly's meeting, that you would
(
496 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
observe to do according to their conclusions, renundingr to recall
all and every of your former acts of a contrary tendency and please
to signify the same to us before our General Court held the 22d
inst., who will then expect it before they return answer to your
committee's proposals. Your cordial and ready attendance unto
this our request, we conceive, will be no obstruction to an amica-
ble treaty for compliance, but rather the contrary if the Lord shall
please to own and succeed such endeavors as means for the better
flourishing of religion, and righteousness with peace, in this wil-
derness. And we cannot apprehend that you need to fear any
damage to your patent hereby from his Majesty's taking ofifence at
so honest a carriage, there being no express interdiction of New
Haven colony inserted therein, nor any intendment of your agent
to have it so injuriously carried against us. And now also have you
the encouragement of all your confederates to apologize upon that
account, in case any turbulent spirits should suggest a complaint,
whom the righteous God can countermand and disappoint, to
whose wisdom and grace wx recommend you and all your weighty
concernments ; resting, gentlemen, your very loving and expectant
confederates.
"The Committee for New Haven Coloxy.
*• By James Bishop, Secretary.
" New Haven, Oct 6, 1663."
At the General Court for the jurisdiction of New
Haven, held Oct. 22, there were read to the freemen
the above communication from the New Haven com-
mittee to the General Assembly at Hartford, the late
decision of the Commissioners maintaining the colony-
State of New Haven, and the letter of Winthrop to
Major Mason and "the rest of the Court there at Hart-
ford." "The deputies also signified the mind of the
freemen, as not at all satisfied with Connecticut com-
mittee's proposals, but thought there should be no •
more treaty with them unless they first restore us to
our right state again."
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT. 497
"The matter was largely debated, and the Court
considering how they of Connecticut do cast off our
motion in the forementioned letter and give us no
answer, but that contrary thereunto is reported, as that
they have further encouraged those at Guilford and
Stamford ; therefore this court did now order that no
treaty be made by this colony with Connecticut before
such acts of power exerted by them upon any of our
towns be revoked and recalled, according to Honored
Mr. Winthrop's letter engaging the same, the Commis-
sioners' advice, and our frequent desires."
At the same court, " after large debate thereupon, it
was concluded as best for us, and most feasible as the
case now stands with us, that we seek a letter of exemp-
tion from his Majesty, and leave the matter concern-
ing a patent in our instructions to our agents in
England as they shall judge best/' For the manage-
ment of this affair, a committee was appointed, and for
its expenses a rate of three hundred pounds was levied.
And as there were many falling off to Connecticut, it
was " ordered that the magistrates do give forth their
warrants according to law, to attach and make seizure
of such personal estate in proportion, for the payment
of their rates, who, upon legal demand made, have or
shall refuse the same, and that the orders provided in
case of distresses be carefully attended ; provided that
for the preservation of the public peace, in case of re-
sistance and forcible rescue, violence be not used to
occasion the shedding of blood saving in their own
defence, but that such officer or officers, so by force of
arms resisted in discharge of their duty, make report
of such resistance and rescue with sufficient proof to
498 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
the magistrate or magistrates or other officer of the
plantation where it happens, in due season to be
presented to the General Court."
New Haven, having taken much encouragement from
the decision of the Commissioners in her favor, was
further strengthened by the reception of two commu-
nications from his Majesty's government, acknowledg-
ing her as a distinct colony. One was only indirectly
addressed by the home government to New Haven, but
the other was especially precious as being under his
Majesty's "own princely hand, and sign manual in red
wax annexed," and addressed expressly to the governor
and assistants of New Haven colony as well as to its
confederates. A court of magistrates held in December
improved the opportunity to issue the following most
loyal proclamation, viz. : —
"Whereas the King's Majesty, by his letter under his own
princely hand, and sign manual in red wax annexed, bearing date
the 2 1 St of June, 1663, from his royal court at Whitehall, directed
to his trusty and well-beloved subjects, the governors and assist-
ants of the Massachusetts, Plymouth, New Haven, and Connecticut
colonies in New England ; and the Lords of his Majesty's most
honorable Privy Council, in their letter from his Majesty's court
aforesaid, bearing date the 24th of June in the year aforesaid, su-
perscribed, * For his Majesty's special service. To our ve»y loving
friend, John Endicott, Esquire, Governor of his Majesty's planta-
tions in New England, and to the Governor and Council of the
colony of the Massachusetts with the rest of the governors of the
English plantations in New England respectively,' and by order
of the General Court at Boston entered upon record in that
court, particularly directed to the governor of the said colony of
New Haven, in which letters his Majesty hath commanded this
colony many matters of weight, very much respecting his Majesty's
service and the good of this countr}' in general, expecting upon
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT. At99
his displeasure the strict observance thereof, which this court (most
of the towns of this colony being situate by the seaside and so
fitly accommodated to fulfil his Majesty's commands) are resolved
to their utmost to obey and fulfil ; but in their consultation there-
about they find, through the disloyal and seditious principles and
practices of some men of inconsiderable interests, some of his
Majesty's good subjects in this colony have been seduced to rend
themselves from this colony, by which division his Majesty's
affairs in these parts (in case some speedy course be not taken
for the prevention thereof) is like to suffer, the peace of this
country to be endangered, and the heathen amongst us scandal-
ized ; the which if we should connive at, especially at this time, his
Majesty having so particularly directed his royal commands to this
colony as aforesaid, we might justly incur his displeasure against
us : this Court doth therefore in his Majesty's name require all the
members and inhabitants of this colony heartily to close with the
endeavors of the Governor and assistants thereof, for the fulfilling
his Majesty's commands in the said letters expressed, and in order
thereunto to return to their due obedience and paying their arrears
of rates for defraying the ;iecessary charges of the colony, and
other dues, within six days after the publication hereof, unto such
person or persons as are or shall be appointed to collect the same
in attendance to the laws and orders of this colony. All which
being done, this court shall forever pass by all former disobedience
to the government ; but if any shall presume to stand out against
his Majesty's pleasure so declared as aforesaid concerning this
colony, at your peril be it : this court shall not fail to call the said
persons to a strict account, and proceed against them (as disloyal to
his Majesty and disturbers of the peace of this colony) according
to law."
This Declaration, as it is called in the records, was
published in the several plantations. At Stamford it
" was violently plucked down " by the Connecticut con-
stable, and "with reproachful speeches rejected, though
sent in his Majesty's name, and by the authority of our
court of magistrates." When published at Guilford,
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT $01
this colony, to require them to forbear putting in execution their
aforesaid declaration against any of those that have joined to our
government, and also to administer the oath of a constable to John
Meigs, and to require him to use his utmost endeavor to maintain
the peace of this colony amongst those at Guilford that have joined
to the government of this colony."
To his certificate of the appointment of this com-
mittee, the Secretary adds, "Mr. James Richards is
desired to attend the service also."
The visit of this committee to Guilford is thus related
in " New Haven's Case Stated : ** —
" On the 30th of December, 1663, two of your magistrates, with
sundry young men and your marshal, came speedily to Guilford,
accompanying Rossiter and his son, and countenancing them and
their party against the authority of this General Court, though you
know how obnoxious they were formerly to this jurisdiction, for
contempt of authority and seditious practices, and that they have
been the ringleaders of this rent; and that Bray Rossiter, the
father, hath been long and still is a man of a turbulent, restless,
fractious spirit, and whose designs you have cause to suspect to be
to cause a war between these two colonies, or to ruin New Haven
Colony: yet him you accompanied in opposition to this colony,
without sending or writing before to our governor to be informed
concerning the truth in this matter. Sundry horses, as we are
informed, accompanied them to Guilford, whither they came at
unseasonable hour, about ten o'clock in the night, these short days,
when you might rationally think that all the people were gone to
bed, and by shooting of sundry guns, some of yours, or of their
party in Guilford, alarmed the town; which, when the governor
took notice of, and of the unsatisfying answer given to such as
inquired the reason of that disturbance, he suspected, and that not
without cause, that hostile attempts were intended by their com-
pany; whereupon he sent a letter to New Haven to inform the
magistrates there concerning matters at Guilford, that many were
affrighted, and he desired that the magistrates of New Haven would
502 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
presently come to their succor, and as many of the troopers as could
be got,' alleging for a reason, his apprehension of their desperate
resolutions. The governor's messenger also excited to haste, as
apprehending danger and reporting to them that Branford went op
in arms hastening to their relief at Guilford, which the govemcM'
required with speed. Hereupon New Haven was alslo alarmed that
night by beating the drum to warn the town militia to be ready.
This fear was not causeless, for what else could be gathered from
the preparations of pistols, bullets, swords, &c., which they brought
with them, and the threatening speeches given out by some of
them, as is attested by the depositions of some and subscriptions of
others, which we have by us to show when need requires ; and your
two magistrates themselves, who ought to have kept the king's
peace among their own party, and in their own speeches, threatened
our governor that if any thing was done against those men, viz.,
Rossiter and his party, Connecticut would take it as done against
themselves, for they were bound to protect them."
Although it was so late in the evening when the
** honored gentlemen*' from Hartford arrived* in Guil-
ford, the following correspondence passed between
them and Gov. Leete : —
" Guilford, Dec. 30, 1663.
" Worthy Sir, — After the presentation of our service to your-
self, you may please to understand that we underwritten, being a
committee authorized by the Council of the Colony of Connecticut,
do desire that yourself would be pleased to give us a meeting to-
morrow about nine of the clock, to treat of such things as present
concernments do require.
" Sir, we desire your answer by the bearer.
** Yours, Samuel Wyllys.
John Allyn.
James Richards.
Wait Winthrop-
" These for Wm, Leete, Esquire, at his house in Guilford^''
* At a general court for New Haven, Dec. 31, 1663, "Mr. Jones
acquainted the toiiVTi ^ith the business of Guilford the last night, and how
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT 503
" Guilford, Dec 30, 1663.
" Honored Gentlemen, — My answer sent before by Jonathan
Gilbert was in earnest, to let you know my true capacity and
resolution, from which I cannot recede, and rest,
"Yours in what I may,
"William Leete.
''For Mr, Wyllys, Mr, John Allyn, Mr, Richards^ Mr, Wait
Winthrop:'
The record of a general court, occasioned by the
visit of the Connecticut gentlemen to Guilford, which
was held at New. Haven, Jan. 7, i66i, indicates that
though Leete refused to give them audience, they had
at least some informal conference with him in regard to
the Declaration lately published by New Haven. The
record is as follows : viz., —
" The publishing of the former Declaration at Guilford occa-
sioned Mr. Rossiter and his son to go up to Connecticut, and there
obtain two of their magistrates, marshal, and sundry others to .
come down to Guilford on the 30th of December last ; who coming
into the town at an unseasonable time of night, their party, by
shooting off sundry guns, caused the town to be alarmed unto great
disturbance, and some of them giving out threatening speeches,
which caused the governor to send away speedily to Branford
and New Haven for help, which caused both those towns to be
alarmed also to great disturbance, the same night, which caused
sending of men both from New Haven and Branford. Now, for
the gaining of a right understanding of the business, and to consider
what to do upon this and the like accounts, occasioned the calling
of this court, though the weather proved very unseasonable.
" But the Court being met together (so many of them as could
possibly stayX the governor related the whole business to the best
of his remembrance; and among other things he informed the
they had sent away six troopers to see what the matter is, but ordered
them not to provoke, neither by word nor action, but to keep the peace."
\.
504 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
Court that those gentlemen of Connecticut, that came down with
Mr. Rossiter and his son, did earnestly desire that there might be
at least a suspension of the execution of that Declaration till there
might be another conference betwixt them and us, wherein they
hoped matters might come to a more comfortable issue ; and they
very earnestly pressed for such a thing, urging how dangerous the
contrary might be, for they said that what we did to those men
whom they had admitted, they must take it as done to Connecticut
colony. Therefore he now desired to know the mind of the Court,
whether they would yield to them so far or no ; but the Court, con-
sidering how fruitless all former treaties had been, and that they
had formerly ordered that there should be no more treaty with
them unless they first restore us those members which they had
so unrighteously taken from us, therefore did now again confirm
the same, and in the issue came to this conclusion : to desire Mr.
Davenport and Mr. Street to draw up in writing all our grievances,
and then, with the approbation of as many of the committee as
could come together, to send it to Connecticut unto their General
Assembly, which accordingly was done in March next, which
writing you have recorded after the conclusions of this Court with
arguments annexed and sundry testimonies both from Guilford
and Stamford.
" Then it was also propounded, whether this Court would con-
firm the former Declaration sent forth by the magistrates, which
was by vote concluded."
The writing which Mr. Davenport and Mr. Street
were requested to draw up, was entitled " New Haven's
Case Stated." Under this title it may be found in
Appendix No. VII., and with it a draught of an answer
in the handwriting of the secretary of Connecticut.
There is no evidence that any answer was ever for-
warded to New Haven. In the opinion of Hollister,
"good judgment was shown in abstaining from an
attempt to answer it." Hollister says, " In all our New
England colonial papers, I have not found a more
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT. $05
touching and eloquent narrative, nor have I ever seen a
more convincing argument." Before this plea of New
Haven reached Hartford, the Council of Connecticut
had appointed another committee to. go to Guilford and
New Haven. From a note inserted in their instruc-
tions it appears that Gov. Winthrop was to precede
them, and make in person such preparation as he could,
for their success. These are their instructions : viz., —
"It is agreed by the Council, that if our honored friends of
New Haven, Guilford, Branford, Milford, and Stamford, will treat
with us for an accommodation, then we will grant and confirm to
them all such privileges as they shall desire, which are not repug-
nant to the tenor of our charter.
"(This following particular is not to be put in execution before
we hear what our honored governor and the rest effect there.)
** But if they will not treat with us and agree for their settlement,
then they are hereby ordered to read the charter at a public meet-
ing (if they can attain it), and to declare that we expect their sub-
mission to his Majesty^s order therein contained; and also, to
commission those now in place to govern the people there accord-
ing to law until further order be taken, and to draw up a declara-
tion which shall be publicly made known to the people, whereby
they may be informed what rational and Christianlike propositions
have been made to the gentlemen there, in several treaties for the
settlement of their and our union."
The correspondence between the committees of the
two colonies which has been preserved is as follows :
viz., —
'* 24th 12 m., 1663 [24th February, i66|].
"Gentlemen, — In order to treaty we propound as a necessary
expedient that you redintegrate our colony by restoring our mem-
bers at Stamford and Guilford, that the confederation may be
repaired and preserved ; then we have power from our general
court to treat with you and to settle agreement, according to God,
506 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
m
between your colony and ours, for future peace between us, for
ourselves and our posterity mutually, which we shall readily attend
upon our receipt of your positive consent to the premises testified
by your joint subscription thereunto, being made an authentical act.
"William Leete,
Matthew Gilbert,
William Jones,
Benjamin Fenn.
Jasper Crane,
Robert Treat."
"Gentli^men, — In answer to your proposals, and as an expe-
dient for the promoting of peace, we propound as followeth : —
" I. In reference to your dissatisfactions respecting divers per-
sons of Guilford and Stamford, and to prevent divisions in those
plantations, it is agreed that they be ordered to submit to the same
authority with their neighbors in those places.
"2. It is agreed that all the elected officers in New Haven, Guil-
ford, Milford, Branford, be hereby authorized to administer justice
to the people in those plantations according to law, and the people
to choose new officers at New Haven at their usual time for that
purpose for the management of their affairs within those planta-
tions, with due caution that our patent be no way violated thereby.
" 3. That all motions or occasions tending to obstruct further
union be carefully shunned, and that all past grievances be buried,
upon a penalty on any that shall revive them.
" 4. And that it be referred to the prudent consideration of those
in place of authority, both in Church and Commonwealth, to think
of accommodations most conducible to the settlement of religion
and righteousness upon the firmest basis of peace, truth, and unity,
for the benefit of posterity ; and that some suitable persons do meet
to that purpose, when either the much-honored Mr. Winthrop or
Mr. Leete shall judge it a fit season, that so brotherly amity may
be propagated to future ages.
"Samuel Wyllys,
Henry Wolcott,
John Allyn,
James Richards.
" Feb. 25, 1665.".
CONTROVERSY WITH CONNECTICUT. SO/
** Gentlemen, — As to your first article in your paper sent us,
we query whether it be an authentic act as done by you, or not, till
it be confirmed by your General Assembly; which, if it be, we
desire that you do signify so much under your hands, as also that
they are positively restored to this jurisdiction by virtue thereof.
William Leete,
" In the name of the rest of the magistrates*
" Feb. 25, 1663."
"Gentlemen, — In answer to yours we return that we are
ready to make authentic what we have proposed to you, if you
please to treat with us as they are propounded.
"John Allyn,
** In the name of the Committee.
"We expect your answer, whether you please thus to treat with
us or not."
A little yielding on either side in this crisis might
have led on to negotiation. If Connecticut had or-
dered those who revolted to her from New Haven " to
submit to the same authority with their neighbors,"
the New Haven committee were bound by promise to
negotiate, but not bound thereby to give up her existence
as a distinct colony. Some of her people would, per-
haps, have been willing to do so ; but there were others
who would never have consented to any arrangement
which would annul the fundamental law of New Haven
concerning suffrage. Davenport, the champion of this
party, writes a few days after the above-written corre-
spondence : " The premises being duly weighed, it will
be your wisdom and way to desist wholly and forever
from endeavoring to draw us into a union under your
patent." But New Haven, however divided on the
question of uniting with Connecticut, was unanimous
508 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
in refusing to treat till she was redintegrated and
acknowledged as a distinct colony. If Connecticut had
fully believed that by retracting she could set in
motion measures which would result in the absorption
of New Haven, she might have sacrificed to the pride
of her sister colony the required punctilio. But fearing
that that party whose desire was, " that we may for the
future live in love and peace together as distinct neigh-
bor colonies, as we did above twenty years together
before you received and misunderstood and so abused
your patent," might become masters of the situation,
she would not otherwise than conditionally retract what
she had done.
CHAPTER XXI.
NEW HAVEN SUBMITS.
THE negotiation between the two colonies was thus
in dead-lock, when, " at the close of a long sum-
mer day, as the sabbath stillness in Boston was begin-
ning, two ships of war — the Guinea, carrying thirty-six
guns, and the Elias, carrying thirty — came to anchor
off Long Wharf. They were the first vessels of the
royal navy that had ever been seen in that harbor.
Officers went on board, and brought back intelligence
to the town, that the ships had sailed ten weeks before
from England, in company with two others, — the
Martin, of sixteen guns, and the William and Nicholas,
of ten, — from which they had parted a week or two
before in bad weather ; and that the fleet conveyed
three or four hundred troops, and four persons charged
with public business. These were Col. Richard Nicolls,
Sir Robert Carr, Col. George Cartwright, and Mr.
Samuel Maverick." » The other vessels had anchored
at Portsmouth three days earlier.
The arrival of these royal commissioners brought to
a speedy issue the controversy between Connecticut
and New Haven. They were instructed to require the
colonies to assist in reducing under English authority
« Palfrey.
509
5IO HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
all the territory occupied by the Dutch, the king claim-
ing it as of right belonging to the English and .bestowing
it on his brother the Duke of York As the territory
thus granted was to be bounded on the east by the
Connecticut River, New Haven experienced a sudden
change of heart toward Connecticut, preferring to sub-
mit to her jurisdiction rather than be subjected to the
rule of a man who was a royalist, a Romanist, and a
Stuart.
Connecticut was also alarmed, or else feigned to
be, at the arrival of the commissioners. As soon as
possible she sent a delegation to New Haven to per-
suade her loving friends there to come under the Win-
throp charter in order to avoid a common danger.
These delegates, one of whom had recently been in
Boston, alleged, moreover, that the leading men of
Massachusetts earnestly desired that Connecticut and
New Haven should come to an agreement, as it had
been ascertained that the commissioners had instruc-
tions to take advantage of disputes between colonies
as well as of every other expedient for reducing all
New England under the immediate government of the
king.
In less than three weeks after the arrival of the
commissioners. Gov. Leete assembled his Court at New
Haven.
" The governor acquainted them with the occasion of this Court,
that there had Mr. Whiting and Lieut. Bull of Hartford been
lately with most of the magistrates, and brought a letter from Mr.
Wyllys to Mr. Jones ; and they signified that Mr. Whiting being
lately in the Bay, and having speech with many friends there, he was
hastened away by them to communicate matters above at Connecti-
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS. 5 1 1
cut, and also to us, showing themselves very sensible of danger of
detriment to the country by reason of any differences between the
colonies, now the king's commissioners were come over; and they
looked upon this difference of ours with Connecticut to be the
greatest, and therefore they declared that they were sent to this
purpose, and declared this to be the advice of the best part in the
Bay, though they had no letter, that this difference be made up
betwixt us, being very sensible of danger to all by this means, and
therefore they judge this the best way for all our safety, to stand
for the liberties of our patents, and so Connecticut and they would
have us to join with them upon that account, for they conceive a
great advantage given to the commissioners by our standing off.
Now we told them, for our parts, we could do nothing in it our-
selves, but after much debate and urging we signified to them thus
much : that if Connecticut would come and assert their claim to us
in the king's authority, and would secure what at any time they
had propounded to us, and would engage to stand to uphold the
liberties of their patent, we would call the General Court together
that they may consider of it, and be ready to give them an answer,
and said for our parts, we did not know but we might bow before
it, if they assert it and make it good. They urged to have some-
thing from us as grounds of certainty that we would so do, but we
told them that we would not do sa Now the Court was desired
to consider of it, what answer should be given if they should so
come. Much debate there was upon it, and something pleaded
upon the danger of standing as now we are, if the king's commis-
sioners come amongst us ; much also was said by some against,
and declared that they see no reason of such a motion, making
that a question to be answered before we knew it would be
put to us ; also that there had not been a full summons to all the
plantations for this General Court ; also it was questioned whether
the General Court, if it were full, had any power to deliver up the
colony state without the consent of the whole body of freemen
at least. But notwithstanding all that was said, it came to a vote
as followeth : that if Connecticut do come down and assert their
right to us by virtue of their charter, and require us in his Majes-
ty's name to submit to their government, that then it be declared
to them that we do submit, referring all arguments between us to
the final issue of the commissioners of our confederates.
512 HISTORY OF NEW II A VEX COLOMV.
"The vote passed in the affirmative; but after the vote
passed there appeared some dissatisfaction, and there was further
advice and consideration taken in the case, and much was said
that it was necessary the freemen should be acquainted with
it, and in the issue came to another vote, which was this : That
if they of Connecticut come and make a claim upon us in his
Majesty *s name and by virtue of their charter, then we shall sub-
mit to them until the commissioners of the colonies do meet ; and
so the governor, the deputy-governor, and magistrates, or so many
of them as can be got together, were appointed to give the answer
to Connecticut men if tliey come."
At the annual meeting of the Commissioners of the
United Colonies in September, Connecticut protested
against the admission of Messrs. Leete and Jones as
Commissioners for New Haven colony, "because it
doth not appear that they are a colony, or have any
power of government distinct from us, confirmed by
regal authority.'* The dispute being thus brought
before them, the representatives of Massachusetts and
Plymouth declared "that as the occasion thereof was
acted without their cognizance, and the grounds not
being fully known to them, they could, as to the right
of the cause, add nothing to what was passed by the
commissioners at their meeting in 1663 : yet, consid-
ering how much the honor of God as well as the weal
of all the colonies, as themselves therein interested,
are concerned in the issue, they heartily and affection-
ately commended such a compliance between them, that
the sad consequences which would inevitably follow
upon their further contentions might be prevented."
" At a general court of the freemen of the jurisdiction held at
New Haven, Sept 14, 1664, the governor acquainted them with
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS, 5 1 3
the occashon of calling them together at this time, and that was
something they had met withal lately at the meeting of the com-
missioners at Hartford, as in the writings may appear, which
writings that concerned us were all now read, with a letter also
subscribed by Mr. Samuel Wyllys and Mr. John Allyn, directed to
James Bishop, to be communicated to this Assembly. The gov-
ernor further said that it was a season to advise and consider
together in wh^t state it is best for us to appear when the commis-
sioners from England come to visit us, whether in the state we
now are, or under a regal stamp (as they call it), in joining with
Connecticut. There was much debate, and divers spake that to
stand as God hath kept us hitherto is our best way; but some
desired to understand the vote of the last General Court, so the
secretary went home to fetch it, and in the mean space, while he
was gone, the assembly was broken up, and no more done at this
time."
The General Assembly of Connecticut met in Octo-
ber, and passed the following order : —
" This Court desires and appoints Mr. Sheartnan and the secre-
tary to go to New Haven, &c., and by order from this Court, in his
Majesty's name, to require all the inhabitants of New Haven,
Milford, Branford, Guilford, and Stamford to submit to the gov-
ernment here established by his Majesty's gracious grant to this
colony, and to take their answer. And they are hereby authorized
to declare all the present freemen of New Haven, Milford, Bran-
ford, Guilford, and Stamford, that are qualified according to law,
to be freemen of this corporation, so many of them as shall accept
of the same and take the freemen's oath. And they are hereby
authorized to make as many freemen as they shall by sufficient
testimony find qualified according to order of court, in that respect,
and to administer the oath of freedom to them.
" They are also to declare that this Court doth invest William
Leete, Esquire, William Jones, Esquire, Mr. Gilbert, Mr. Fenn, Mr.
Crane, Mr. Treat, and Mr. Law, with magistratical power, to assist
in the government of those plantations and the people thereof,
according to the laws of this corporation, or so many of their own
514 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
laws and orders as are not contradictory to the tenor of our charter,
until May next ; and if any of these above-named refuse to accept
to govern the people as aforesaid, then Mr. Shearman and the
secretary are hereby authorized to appoint some other fit persons
in their room, and to administer an oath to them for the faithful
execution of the trust conunitted to them."
For some reason Mr. Richards was desired to go in
place of Mr. Shearman to Stamford, where, Mr. Law
having been won over, they found no great difficulty in
persuading the town to submit. The committee origin-
ally appointed visited Milford on the 17th of November,
where they issued a call for a meeting of all house-
holders, as follows : —
" These are in his Majesty's name to will and require jrou forth-
with to warn all the inhabitants at your town of Milford, being
householders, to meet at the meeting-house this day about one of
the clock, to attend such occasions with Mr. Shearman and myself,
as are given us in charge by the General Court of Connecticut ;
whereof fail not. John Allyn, Secretary^"*
" To Joseph Waters^ to execute^'*
The people of Milford, assembling in response to this
call, voted to submit to Connecticut. " No one person
voted against it."
On the 19th of the same month, Mr. Shearman and
Secretary Allyn were present at a town-meeting in
New Haven, where Mr. Jones, who at the election in
May had been chosen deputy-governor, and was there-
fore moderator of the plantation court, "acquainted the
town that the occasion of the meeting was that there
were some gentlemen from Connecticut that had some-
thing to acquaint the town withal, and he thought the
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS. 5 1 5
business in general was to require our submission to
Connecticut, with some other propositions. He further
minded the town of the peace and unity that God had
hitherto continued amongst us, and the many blessings
both on the right hand and left that we enjoyed under
this government ; and also told the town that we are a
people in combination with others, and therefore could
not give a full answer without first acquainting the
other plantations, and then that we ourselves were not
a full meeting of the town, divers of the farms having
not warning. But, the gentlemen being come in, Mr.
Jones desired to see their commission. They declared
that they should show it to persons deputed, but after,
read it, and then declared what they had to say to the
town. The persons were Mr. John Allyn and Mr.
Samuel Shearman. These gentlemen urged to have
the matter put to vote, but they were told that the
town-meeting was not full. But Mr. Allyn said that if
Mr. Shearman did consent, which he thought he would,
he should take the boldness to put it to vote himself;
but his speech was disliked, and after, witnessed against,
and they were desired to withdraw awhile, and the
town would consider to give them an answer ; and so
they did, and the town considering of it came to this
conclusion as their present answer by a general vote,
only one dissenting, which answer follows their decla-
ration. The gentlemen aforesaid being called in again,
the answer was read to them. They desired a copy of
it ; which was granted, they leaving a copy of what
they had declared, which they promised, and is here
inserted as followeth."
The declaration of the Connecticut committee was
5l6 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
in accordance with their instructions. The answer of
the New Haven town-meeting, though not preserved,
was doubtless substantially what the moderator had
already stated ; viz., that submission to such a demand
must come from the colony of New Haven, and not
from its several plantations.
The committee visited also Branford and Guilford,
where the answers they received to their requirement
of submission were in accordance with that of New
Haven.
Submission to Connecticut was now the manifest
destiny of New Haven, and the only remaining ques-
tion respected the mode. The royal commissioners
had obliterated the Dutch power in America, and New
Haven was included in the territory given to the Duke
of York. A "distinct colony state " being out of the
question, the best practicable condition was to become a
part of Connecticut. The course of events had at last
brought all but a very few to this conclusion. How-
ever strongly they were attached to the peculiarities of
their colony, including, as most important of all, its
limitation of suffrage, and however deeply offended with
the insult their colony had received from Connecticut,
they saw that submission was a necessity. If there
were a few who still desired " to stand as God hath
kept us hitherto," they were, since the reduction of
New Netherlands, so few that nothing could be accom-
plished. All that the leading men now hoped for was
that the colony might die decently. Not consenting
that the plantations should separately transfer alle-
giance, they required that the General Court of the
jurisdiction should assemble and vote its submission.
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS, 5 1 /
If any thing was wanting to bring the last man to
despair of maintaining a distinct colony state, it was a
formal determination by the royal commissioners of the
boundary between Connecticut and New York. If
New Haven was in Connecticut, the distinct colony of
New Haven was at an end ; but the other alternative
was worse.
Winthrop with several associates had been appointed
by the General Assembly of Connecticut, at their ses-
sion in October, to go to New York, " to congratulate
his Majesty's Honorable Commissioners." They were
empowered, " if an opportunity offer itself that they can
issue the bounds between the Duke's patent and ours,
so as in their judgment may be to the satisfaction
of the Court, to attend the same." Winthrop had been
present with the Commissioners, and rendered them
important aid, in negotiating the surrender of New
Amsterdam in the preceding August ; but still further
to prepare the way for an issue that would be to the
satisfaction of the Court, an order had been passed
" that Col. Nicolls and the rest of the Commissioners
be presented with four hundred bushels of corn as a
present from this colony."
The decision of the Commissioners was rendered on
the thirtieth day of November. After assigning Long
Island, which Connecticut claimed as one of the "adja-
cent islands," mentioned in her charter, to his Royal
Highness the Duke of York, they proceeded to declare
** that the creek or river called Momoronock, which is
reputed to be about twelve miles to the east of West
Chester, and a line drawn from the east point or side,
where the fresh water falls into the salt at high-water
5l8 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
mark, north-north-west, to the line of the Massachu-
setts, be the western bounds of the said colony of Con-
necticut ; and all plantations lying westward of that
creek and line so drawn to be under his Royal High-
nesses government, and all plantations lying eastward
of that creek and line to be under the government of
Connecticut."
Thirteen days after this authoritative determination
of the western boundary of Connecticut, the Jurisdic-
tion of New Haven held its last general court. " The
freemen of New Haven, Guilford, Branford, and part of
Milford, and as many of the inhabitants as were pleased
to come,'* assembled to put an end to their distinct
colony state, by submission to Connecticut.
"The governor acquainted them with the occasion of calling
them together ; and that is, some of Connecticut gentlemen having
made demand of our submission to their government, in his
Majesty's name, the answers of these three towns were with prom-
ise of further answer when they should consider of the matter
together; and therefore to set their thoughts a-work about it,
something was propounded to them and left with them to consider
of till the morning.
"In the morning, the assembly being come together, the gov-
ernor propounded to know what was the issue of their thoughts in
the business left with them. After some debate, the answer was
drawn up in writing, and read, and after serious consideration put
to vote, and so was concluded with universal consent, not any one
opposing.
" The vote of the freemen and other inhabitants of the colony met together
at New Haverty the ijth of December ^ '6^, in answer to what Mr. ydhn
Allyn and Mr. Samuel Shearman declared in our several towns in
November last as followeth : —
"I. First that by this act or vote we be not understood to
justify Connecticut's former actings, nor any thing disorderly done
by our own people upon such a9C0unts.
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS. 5 1 9
"2. That by it we be not apprehended to have any hand in
breaking or dissolving the confederation.
** Yet in testimony of our loyalty to the king's Majesty, when
an authentic copy of the determination of his Commissioners is
published to be recorded with us, if thereby it shall appear to our
committee that we are by his Majesty's authority now put under
Connecticut patent, we shall submit, as from a necessity brought
upon us by their means of Connecticut aforesaid, but with a salvo
jure of our former right and claim, as a people who have not yet
been heard in point of plea."
A committee having been appointed for consummat-
ing matters with Connecticut, and the following letter
having been read and approved, it was sent to the
authorities of Connecticut with the aforesaid vote.
" Honored Gentlemen, — We having been silent hitherto as
to the making of any grievance known unto the king's commis-
sioners, notwithstanding what may be with us of such nature from
the several transactions that have been amongst us, are desirous
so to continue the managing of these affairs in ways consistent
with the ancient confederation of the United Colonies, choosing
rather to suffer than to begin any motion hazardful to New Eng-
land settlements. In pursuance whereof (according to our prom-
ise to your gentlemen sent lately to demand our submission,
though in a divided if not dividing way, within our towns severally
seeking to bring us under the government by yourselves already
settled, wherein we have had no hand to settle the same, and before
you had cleared to our conviction the certain limits of your charter,
which may justly increase the scruple of too much haste in that
and former actings upon us), the generality of our undivided
people have orderly met this 13th of December, 1664, and by the
vote enclosed have prepared for this answer, to be given, of our
submission, which being done by us, then for the accommodating
of matters betwixt us in amicable wise, by a committee empowered
to issue with you on their behalf and in the behalf of all con-
cerned, according to instructions given to the said committee.
We never did nor ever do intend to damnify your moral rights or
520 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
just privilege, consistent with our like honest enjoyment, and we
would hope that you have no further scope towards us, not to
violate our covenant interest, but to accommodate us with that we
shall desire and the patent bear, as hath been often said you would
do. And surely you have the more reason to be full with us
herein, seeing that your success for patent bounds with those
gentlemen now obtained, seems to be debtor to our silence before
them, whenas you thus by single application and audience issued
that matter. You thus performing to satisfaction, we may still
rest silent, and according to profession by a studious and cordial
endeavor with us' to advance the interest of Christ in this wilder-
ness and by the Lord's blessing thereupon, love and union be-
tween us may be greatly confirmed and all our comforts enlarged ;
which is the earnest prayer of, gentlemen, your loving friends and
neighbors,
" The Committee appointed by the freemen and inhabitants of New
Haven colony now assembled,
" <^ James Bishop, Secretary,
" New Haven, Dec 14, 1664."
The submission of New Haven was an unqualified
triumph for Connecticut. There had been a time
when she would have modified the qualifications for
suffrage, and made them as nearly conformable to those
in New Haven as the home government would allow.
The qualifications she had proposed to New Haven in
the preceding year are almost exactly what Massachu-
setts adopted when the royal commissioners demanded,
in the king's name, that church-membership should not
be insisted on. At that time, she seemed willing to
permit New Haven to have a court in which magis-
trates might, without a jury, try and determine causes.
She even seemed willing to exempt the churches of
New Haven County from that Erastian control, which,
in the session of the General Assembly when Mr.
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS, 5 2 1
Shearman and Secretary Allyn were appointed to de-
mand the submission of New Haven, commended "to
the ministers and churches in this colony to consider
whether it be not their duty to entertain all such per-
sons who are of an honest and godly conversation,
having a competency of knowledge in the principles of
religion, and shall desire to join with them in church
fellowship by an explicit covenant ; and that they have
their children baptized ; and that all the children of the
church be accepted and accounted real members of
the church, and that the church exercise a due Chris-
tian care and watch over them ; and that when they
are grown up, being examined by the officers in the
presence of the church, it appears in the judgment of
charity they are duly qualified to participate in that
great ordinance of the Lord's Supper, by their being
able to examine themselves and discern the Lord's
body, such persons be admitted to full communion.
The Court desires that the several officers of the
respective churches would be pleased to consider
whether it be not the duty of the Court to order the
churches to practise according to the premises, if they
do not practise without such an order."
But New Haven, instead of securing these conces-
sions by capitulating when they were offered, had obsti-
nately refused, and had now submitted without any
definite assurance of peculiar privileges. Plainly, they
were expecting that their loving friends would accom-
modate them with every thing they might " desire and
the patent bear." Their letter of submission mentions
with other matters, a committee they had appointed to
communicate their desires, and alleges that the silence
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS. 523
only yourselves necessitating thereunto shall revive them^ being
willing to pursue truth and peace as much as may be with all men,
especially with our dear brethren in the fellowship of the gospel,
and fellow-members of the same civil corporation, accommodated
with so many choice privileges, which we are willing, after all is
prepared to your hands, to confer upon you equal with ourselves ;
which we wish may at last produce the long-desired effect of your
free and cordial closure with us, not attributing any necessity im-
posed by us further than the situation of those plantations in the
heart of our colony, and therein the peace of posterity in these
parts of the country is necessarily included, and that after so long
liberty to present your plea where you have seen meet. Gentle-
men, we desire a full answer as speedily as may be, whether those
lately empowered, accept to govern according to their commission ;
if not, other meet persons to govern, may by us be empowered in
their room. Thus desiring the Lord to unite our hearts and spirits
in ways well pleasing in his sight,
" Which is the prayer of your very loving friends,
" The Council of the Colony of Connecticut.
" Signed by their order by me, John Allyn, Secretary,''*
New Haven made but one more effort to obtain con-
cessions. The effort was neither vigorous nor effectual.
The following letter ended its resistance to the will of
Connecticut.
" New Haven, Jan. 5, 1665.
"Honored Gentlemen, — Whereas, by yours, dated Dec. 21,
1664, you please to say that you did the same as we in not making
any grievance known to the commissioners, &c. ; unto that may be
returned that you had not the same cause so to do, from any pre-
tence of injury by our intermeddling with your colony or covenant
interest : unto which we refer that passage. For our expressing
desires to manage all our matters in consistency with the Confed-
eration, we hope you will not blame us; how dissonant or con-
sonant your actings with us have been, we leave to the confederates
to judge, as their records may show. That article which allows
two colonies to join, doth also with others assert the justness of
524 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
each colony's distinct right until joined to mutual satisfaction, and
the provision made in such case the last session we gainsay not,
when the union is so completed, and a new settlement of the con-
federation by the respective general courts accomplished. Their
pathetical advice and counsel for an amicable union we wish may
be so attended ; in order whereunto we gave you notice of a com-
mittee prepared to treat with you for such an accommodation,
unto which you give us no answer, but instead thereof, send forth
your edict from authority upon us before our conviction for submis-
sion was declared to you. The argument from our intermixt situa"
tion is the same now as it was before our confederating and ever
since, and afiEords no more ground now to disannul the covenant
than before. We might marvel at your strange why we should
think your success should be debtor to our silence, and that be-
cause the news of our non-compliance was with the commissioners ;
as if the mere news of such a thing contained the strength of all
we had to say or plead. Gentlemen, we entreat you to consider
that there is more in it than so, yea, that still we have to allege
things of weight, and know where and how, if we chose not rather
to abate and suffer, than by striving, to hazard the hurting your-
selves or the common cause. We scope not at reflections, but
conviction and conscience-satisfaction, that so brethren in the fel-
lowship of the gospel might come to a cordial and regular closure,
and so walk together in love and peace to advance Christ's interest
among them, which is all our design ; but how those high and holy-
ends are like so to be promo ved between us without a treaty for
accommodation, we have cause to doubt, yet that we may not fail
in the least to perform whatever we have said, we now signify, that
having seen the copy of his Majesty's commissioners' determination
(deciding the bounds betwixt his highness the Duke of York, and
Connecticut's charter), we do declare submission thereunto accord-
ing to the true intent of our vote, unto which we refer you. As to
that part of yours concerning our magistrates' and officers' accept-
ance, their answer is, that they having been chosen by the people
here to such trust, and sworn thereunto for the year ensuing, and
until new be orderly chosen, and being again desired to continue
that trust, they shall go on in due observance thereof, according to
the declaration left with us by Mr. John AUyn and Mr. Samuel
NE W HA VEN SUBMITS, $2$
Shearman, bearing date Nov. 19, 1664, in hope to find that in a
loving treaty for accommodating matters to the ends professed by
you, unto which our committee stands ready to attend, upon notice
from you, truth and peace may be maintained. So shall we not
give you further trouble, but remain, gentlemen, your very loving
friends and neighbors,
" T/te committee appointed by the freemen and inhabitants of New
Haven Colony ^ signed ^ their order ^ ^ me,
" James Bishop, Secretary."
This reiterated appeal for a "loving treaty" brought
forth no response, and the people of the late colony of
New Haven found that they were not to be allowed
to retain any of the peculiarities they had so highly
prized under the old jurisdiction. Deputies from the
plantation of New Haven appeared and sat in the Gen-
eral Assembly of Connecticut in the following April.
An act of indemnity was at that time passed as follows :
" This Court doth hereby declare that all former actings
that have passed by the former power at New Haven,
so far as they have concerned this colony (whilst they
stood as a distinct colony), though they in their own
nature have seemed uncomfortable to us, yet they are
hereby buried in perpetual oblivion, never to be called
to account." At the election in May four gentlemen
who had been magistrates under the New Haven juris-
diction were appointed magistrates of Connecticut.
A very large majority of the people formerly under
the jurisdiction of New Haven soon became satisfied
with their new relation. Branford, however, was an
exception. In the words of Trumbull, "Mr. Pierson
and almost his whole church and congregation were
so displeased that they soon removed into Newark in
526 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY.
New Jersey. They carried off the records of the church
and town, and, after the latter had been settled about
five and twenty years, left it almost without inhabit-
ants. For more than twenty years from that time
there was not a church formed in the. town. People
from various parts of the colony gradually moved into
it, and purchased the lands of the first planters, so that
in about twenty years it became resettled In 1685 it
was re-invested with town privileges.**
Most of all, Davenport, who, on the other side of
the sea, had devised the peculiar constitution of New
Haven, who had seen the establishment of successive
plantations according to the pattern he had set, and the
combination of them under a colonial government, was
distressed at the ruin of his plans and his hopes. In
April, 1666, Winthrop wrote requesting him to preach
the election sermon in May, and suggesting that he
would have been asked to preach the preceding year,
but that the union was not then complete Daven-
port, who had just entered his seventieth year, and
was suffering with malaria, writes of his " unfitness for
such a journey," mentions the intention of his colleague
to visit Boston as a reason why he himself must remain
at home, and adds, " I have sundry other weighty rea-
sons whereby I am strongly and necessarily hindered
from that service, which may more conveniently be
given by word of mouth to your honored self, than
expressed by writing." Retaining the letter in his
hand two days, he writes in a postscript: "The rea-
son which it pleased you to give why I was not for-
merly desired to preach at the election, holdeth as ^
strong against my being invited thereunto now. For fl
NEW HAVEN SUBMITS. $2/
we are not yet fully joined, by the Court's refusal
of our freemen to vote in the last election, when
they came thither to that end, in obedience to their
absolute summons, and about twenty of ours were
sent home as repudiated after they had suffered the
diflSculties and hazards of an uncomfortable and unsafe
journey in that wet season." * Writing hjs reply the
same day he received Winthrop's invitation, he ruled
his spirit ; but, after two days of musing, he gives vent
to his disappointment in the complaint that the free-
men of New Haven were not, as such, received and
treated under the expected treaty of accommodation, as
freemen of Connecticut. A year later he writes to
Winthrop with something of his former cordiality and
abandon, as if time had softened his resentment. But
he never recovered from the disappointment which fell
upon him like a blow at the extinction of the little sov-
ereignty whose foundations he had laid. New Haven,
as Palfrey rightly says, "ceased to be attractive to
him. It was rather the monument of a great defeat
and sorrow." He speaks in a letter to a friend in
Massachusetts of "Christ's interest in New Haven
Colony as miserably lost." In this state of mind he
received an invitation to the pastorate of the First
Church in Boston, there to champion the cause of ortho-
doxy against the half-way covenant. Contrary to the
wishes of his church and congregation, he determined
to accept the invitation. Mr. John Hull of Boston
* These freemen of New Haven Colony doubtless presented themselves
as voters in response to a public summons directed to freemen of Con-
necticut. As they had not taken the oath of allegiance to that colony, they
were repudiated.
528 HISTORY OF NEW HAVEN COLONY,
writes in his diary, under date of May 2, 1668: "At
three or four in the afternoon came Mr. John Daven-
port to town, with his wife, son, and son's family, and
were met by many of the town. A great shower of
extraordinary drops of rain fell as they entered the
town ; but Mr. Davenport and his wife were sheltered
in a coach of Mr. Searl, who went to meet them."
Mr. Davenport's ministry in Boston was of short
duration. He died in less than two years after the date
given above. His removal from New Haven doubtless
helped to obliterate the bitter feelings produced by the
controversy between Connecticut and New Haven.
The union of the two colonies was in itself so desir-
able, that resentment against what was wrong in the
means of accomplishing it yielded to the stronger
feeling of satisfaction with the result. After two cen-
turies. New Haven scarcely remembers that she was
once a distinct colonv.
APPENDIX.
APPENDIX I.
AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MICHAEL WIGGLESWORTH.
[From the N. E. Hist, and Gren. Reg., vol. xvii.]
I WAS bom of Godly Parents, that feared y« Lord greatly,
even from their youth, but in an ungodly Place, where y« gen-
erality of y« people rather derided then imitated their piety, in
a place where, to my knowledge, their children had Learnt
wickedness betimes, In a place that was consumed w'^ fire in a
great part of it, after God had brought them out of it.* These
godly parents of mine meeting with opposition & persecution
for Religion, because they went from their own Parish Church
to hear y« word & Receiv y« L* supper &c took up resolutions
to pluck up their stakes & remove themselves to New Eng-
land, and accordingly they did so. Leaving dear Relations friends
& acquaintace, their native Land, a new built house, a flour-
ishing Trade, to expose themselves to y« hazzard of y« sea^
and to y« Distressing difficulties of a howling wilderness, that
they might enjoy Liberty of Conscience & Christ in his ordi-
nances. And the Lord brought them hither & Landed them
at Charlestown, after many difficulties and hazzards, and me
along with them being then a child not full seven yeers old.
' In the copy of the N. E. Hist, and Gen. Register which belongs to
the N. H. Col. Hist. Society is this manuscript note : —
" Hedon, a village in the East Riding of Yorkshire, on the river Hum-
ber, three miles from Hull, was almost entirely consumed by fire in the
year 1656. H. D."
The initials are those of Mr. Horace Day, a former secretary of the
Society.
• 53«
532 APPENDIX /.
After about 7 weeks stay at Charls Town, my parents removed
again by sea to New-Haven in }•« month of Oct9ber. In o*" pas-
sage thither we were in great Danger by a storm which drove
us upon a Beach of sand where we lay beating til another Tide
fetcht us off; but God carried us to o' port in safety. Winter
approaching we dwelt in a cellar partly under ground covered
with earth the first winter. But I remember that one great rain
brake in upon us & drencht me so in my bed being asleep that
I fell sick upon it ; but >•« Lord in mercy spar'd my Ufe & re-
stored my health. When y« next summer was come 1 was sent
to school to Mr. Ezekiel Cheever who at that time taught
school in his own house, and under him in a year or two I
profited so much through y« blessing of God, that I began to
make Latin & to get forward apace. But God who is infinitely
wise and absolutely soverain, and gives no account concerning
any of his proceedings, was pleased about this time to \'isit my
father with Lameness which grew upon him more & more to
his dying Day, though he liv*d under it 13 yeers. He wanting
help was fain to take me off from school to follow other employ-
ments for y^ space of 3 or 4 yeers until I had lost all that I had
gained in the Latine Tongue. But when I was now in my
fourteenth veer, my Father, who I suppose was not wel satis-
fied in keeping me from Learning whereto I had been designed
from my infancy, & not judging me fit for husbandry, sent me
to school again, though at that time I had little or no dispo-
sition to it, but I was uilling to submit to his authorit)' therein
and accordingly I went to school under no small disadvantage
& discouragement seing those that were far inferior to me, by ray
discontinuance now gotten far before me. But in a little time
it appeared to be of God, who was pleased to facilitate my work
& bless mv studies that I soon recovered what I had lost &
gained a great deal more, so that in 2 yeers and 3 quarters
I was judged fit for )•« Colledge and thither I was sent, far from
my parents & acquaintace among strangers. But when father
APPENDIX L 533
and mother both forsook me, then the Lord took care of
me. It was an act of great self Denial in my father that not-
withstanding his own Lameness and great weakness of Body
w<=*» required the service & helpfulness of a son, and having
but one son to be y« staff of his age & supporter of his weakness
he would yet for my good be content to deny himself of that
comfort and Assistace I might have Lent him. It was also an
evident proof of a strong Faith in him, in that he durst adven-
ture to send me to y« CoUedge, though his Estate was but
small & little enough to maintain himself & small family left
at home. And God Let him Live to see how acceptable to
himself this service was in giving up his only son to y* Lord and
bringing him up to Learning ; especially ^'^ Lively actings of his
faith & self denial herein. For first, notwithstanding his great
weakness of body, yet he Lived til I was so far brought up as
that I was called to be a fellow of y« Colledge and improved
in Publick service there, and until I had preached several
Times ; yea and more then so, he Lived to see & hear what
Ood had done for my soul in turning me from Darkness to
light & fr5 the power of Sathan unto God, w<^ filled his heart
ful of joy and thankfulness beyond what can be expressed.
And for his outward estate, that was so far from being sunk by
what he spent from yeer to yeer upon my education, that in 6
veers time it was plainly doubled, w<^*» himself took great notice
of, and spake of it to my self and others to y« praise of God,
w»*» Admiration and thankfulness. And after he had lived
under great & sore affliction for y« space of 13 yeers a pat-
tern of faith, patience, humility & heavenly mindedness, having
done his work in my education and receive* an answer to his
])rayers God took him to his Heavenly Rest where he is now
reaping y« fruit of his Labors. When I came first to }•« Col-
ledge, I had indeed enjoyed y« benefit of religious & strict edu-
cation, and God in his mercy and pitty kept me from scandalous
sins before I came thither & after I came there, but alas I had
534 APPENDIX I.
a naughty vile heart and wzs acted by corrupt nature & there-
fore could propound no Right and noble ends to my self, but
acted from self and for self. I was indeed studious and strove
to outdoe my compeers, but it was for bono' & applause &
preferm* & such poor Beggarly ends. Thus I had my Ends
and God had his Ends far differing fix)m mine, yet it pleased
him to Bless my studies, & to make me grow in knowledge both
in y« tongues & Inferior Arts & also in Divinity. But when I
had been there about tliree yeers and a half; God in his Love
& Pitty to my soul wrought a great change in me both in heart
& Life, and from that time forward I learnt to study with God
and for God. And whereas before that, I had thoughts of ap-
plying my self to y* study & Practice of Physick, I wholly laid
aside those thoughts, and did chuse to serve Christ in y« work
of >•* ministry if he would please to fit me for it & to accept
of my service in that great work.
APPENDIX II.
LETTER OF NATHANAEL ROWE TO JOHN WINTHROP.
To the worshipfuU b* much respected Friende Mr, Wtnthrop,
Magistrate liveing att Boston in New Ing:
Most loving & kinde Sir, — My humblest service remem-
bered to you, I now w*^ much consideratione (and thinkinge
of all things & businesses) doe now write to you. First of all
my father sent mee to this countrie verie hastelie, (& overmuch
inconsideraely) indeed it is a sore griefe to mee y* I should
charge my prudent & most deare father w**» the evill of rash
doeinge of thinges ; but yet being compelled in this time of
straighteness, I must say itt. My father sent with mee pvtiones
enough for to serve mee a yeare or towe ; as meale, flower,
buttar, beefe. I, haveinge lost my meale and flower, was com-
pelled to sell the rest of my pvicon, & indeed, being counselled
soe to doe, I immediately did itt. Then Mr. Eaton and Mr.
Davenport haveinge noe direct order w* to doe, wished me &
sent me unto Mr. Eaton, the marchant*s brother, to be instructed
in the rudiments of the Lattine tongue (in w«*» w'^ practise, I
shalbe prettie skilfull. I lived with him about a month, &
verily in y* space he spake not one word to mee, scilicet, about
my leaminge, & after he went awaie, I lived an idle life, because
I had noe instructor. After all this, I was sent (by Mr. Bel-
lingha* order) unto Mr. Willis of Linne, the school-maister : and
theire I liveing privately gott the best part of my Lattine-
tongue, but yet not by his instructiones, butt indeed onelie by
seeinge his manner of teachinge, & gatheringe thinges of my
535
536 APPENDIX //.
selfe, & also by bribeinge (or giveing gifts to) his sonnes for
pattemes ; of which Mr Willis never knew as yett. This last
half yeare hath binne spent in receiveing instructiones frome
Mr. Dunster, whoe (blessed be God for it) hath binne a guide
to leade mee onne in the waie of hummane litterature, & alsoe
in divine. Thus much for my cors in this lande : seeing, sir, you
out of your fountaine of wisdome, doe adjudge that it is my
father's will & pleasure that I should betake myselfe to one
thinge or other, whereby I mighte gett my liveinge (O Tempora,
O Mores !) why for my part I shall be willinge to doe anie
thinge for my father (God assistinge mee) att Quille-piacke, as
to help to cleare grownde, or hough upp grounde, quia enim^
qui humiliatury is vera icmpestivd exaltabitur. But, I pray
you, sir, to make the waie cleare for mee to goe to England, so
that I may speake more fulke to my father & w* my friends, soe
that if my father hath caste his affections off frome mee (which,
if I had but one serious thought that waie, it would be the dis-
tractinge of my spirite all the daies I have to live. The curse
of the parent is the greatest heviness & burden to [the] soule
of a childe y' is ; my father never made anie such thing knowne
to mee) that I might not loose those opportunities that are
offerred to mee by one of my uncles, whome I am certain will
doe mee anie good, & if my father be offended w*** mee, then,
if I be att London, I feare not but tha[t] my uncle will pacifie
my father's wrathe. Thus I end.
Yo' observant servant,
Nath. Rowe.
APPENDIX III.
LAMBERTON'S SHIP.
SO much interest is felt in Lamberton*s ship that I have f<?lt
inclined to bring together what the early writers have
recorded concerning the vessel herself and concerning the
atmospheric phenomenon which the superstition of the times
connected with her loss.
Winthrop mentions her thrice. When the news of her depar-
ture had reached Boston, he records that " this was the earliest
and sharpest winter we had since we arrived in the country, and
it was as vehement cold to the southward as here," adding, as
one illustration, "At New Haven, a ship bound for England
was forced to be cut out of the ice three miles." In the follow-
ing June, when solicitude had nearly or quite given place to
despair, he writes, " There fell a sad affliction upon the country
this year, though it more particularly concerned New Haven
and those parts. A small ship of about one hundred tons set
out from New Haven in the middle of the eleventh month last,
(the harbor being then so frozen as they were forced to hew
her through the ice near three miles). She was laden with
pease and some wheat, all in bulk, with about two hundred
West India hides, and store of beaver and plate, so as it was
estimated in all at five thousand pounds. There were in her
about seventy persons, whereof divers were of very precious
account, as Mr. Gregson, one of their magistrates, the wife of
Mr. Goodyear, another of their magistrates (a right godly
woman), Captain Turner, Mr. Lamberton, master of the ship,
537
538« APPENDIX III.
and some seven or eight others, members of the church there.
The ship never went voyage before, and was very crank-sided,
so as it was conceived she was overset in a great tempest which
happened soon after she put to sea, for she was never heard of
after." Two years afterward, that is, in June, 1648, he writes,
as if the news had just reached him, " There appeared over the
harbor at New Haven, in the evening, the form of the keel of a
ship with three masts, to which were suddenly added the tack-
ling and sails, and presently after, upon the top of the poop, a
man standing with one hand akimbo under his left side, arid in
his right hand a sword stretched out toward the sea. Then
from the side of the ship which was from the town arose a great
smoke which covered all the ship and in that smoke she van-
ished away ; but some saw her keel sink into the water. This
was seen by many, men and women, and it continued about a
quarter of an hour."
Hubbard, who was bom in 1649, says, "The main founders
of New Haven were men of great estates, notably well versed in
trading and merchandising, strongly bent for trade and to gain
their subsistence that way, choosing their seat on purpose in
order thereunto, so that if the providence of God had gone
along with an answerable blessing, they had stood fair for the
first born of that emplo)Tnent. But that mercy, as hath since
appeared, was provided for another place, and a meaner con-
dition for them ; for they quickly began to meet with insuper-
able difficulties, and though they built some shipping and sent
abroad their provisions into foreign parts, and purchased lands
at Delaware and other places to set up trading-houses for beaver,
yet all would not help ; they sank apace, and their stock wasted,
so that in five or six years they were ver}' near the bottom : yet,
being not willing to give over, they did, as it were, gather
together all their remaining strength, to the building and load-
ing out one ship for England, to try if any better success might
befall them for their retrievement. Into this ship they put, in a
APPENDIX III. 539
manner, all their tradable estates, much com, large quantities
of plate, and sundry considerable persons also went, amongst
whom was Mr. Gregson forementioned, who, besides his own
private occasions, carried with him some estate in order to the
procuring of a patent : but all this, though done by very wise
men, yet hath since been thought to be carried by a kind of
infatuation ; for the ship was ill-built, very wait-sided, and, to
increase the inconveniency thereof, ill-laden, the lighter goods
at the bottom : so that understanding men did even beforehand
conclude in their deliberate thoughts a calamitous issue, espe-
cially being a winter voyage, and so in the dead of winter that
they were necessitated with saws to cut open the ice, for the
passage of the ship frozen in for a large way together ; yet were
all these things overlooked, and men went on in a hurry till it
was too late, when such circumstances as these were called to
mind. The issue was, the ship was never heard of, foundered
in the sea, as is most probable, and with the loss of it their
hope of trade gave up the ghost, which was gasping for life
before in New Haven. But this was not all the loss ; besides
the goods, there were sundry precious Christians lost, not less
than ten belonging to the church there, who, as Mr. Cotton's
expression upon it was, went to heaven in a chariot of water, as
Elijah long before in a chariot of fire. There were also some
writings of Mr. Hooker's and Mr. Davenport's lost, that never
were at all or not fully repaired."
In another place discoursing of memorable accidents he says,
" Another deplorable loss befell New England the same year,
wherein New Haven was principally concerned and the south-
ern parts of the country : for the inhabitants of that town, being
Londoners, were very desirous to fall into a way of traffic, in
which they were better skilled than in matters of husbandry;
and to that end had built a ship of one hundred tons, which
they freighted for London, intending thereby to lay some foun-
dation of a future trade : but either by the ill form of her
540 APPENDIX III,
building or by the shifting of her lading (which was wheat, which
is apt to shift its place in storms), the vessel miscarried, and in
her seventy persons, some of whom were of the princijxil part of
the inhabitants, with all the wealth they could gather together."
Hubbard makes no mention of the apparition in the air
which followed the loss of the ship, and Wintlirop, who was no
sceptic in regard to supernatural interventions, records it with-
out intimating that he regarded it as a miracle ; but Mather,
who wrote about as long after the occurrence as did Hubbard,
has given us the story with the superstitious interpretation
attached to it by some, at least, of his contemporaries. Desir-
ing to give it accurately, he wTOte to Rev. James Pierpont, the
successor of Davenport in the pastorate of the church at New
Haven, and received from him the following letter in reply : —
" Reverend and Dear Sir, — In compliance with your desires I now
give you the relation of that apparition of a ship in the air, which I have
received from the most credible, judicious, and curious sur\*iving obscr\'ers
of it.
"In the year 1647,* besides much other lading, a far more rich treasure
of passengers (five or six of which were persons of chief note and worth
in New Haven) put themselves on board a new ship, built at Rhode
Island, of about a hundred and fiftv tons, but so waltv that the master
(Lamberton) often said she would prove their grave. In the month of
Januar)-, cutting their way through much ice, on which they were accom-
panied with the Rev. Mr. Davenport, besides many other friends, with
many fears, as well as prayers and tears, they set sail. Mr. Daven-
port in prayer with an observable emphasis used these words : * Lord,
if it be thy pleasure to bur}' these our friends in the bottom of the sea,
they are thine, save them.' The spring following, no tidings of these
friends arrived with the ships from England; New Haven's heart began
to fail her : this put the godly people on much prayer, both public and
private, that the Lord would (if it was his pleasure) let them hear what he
had done with their dear friends, and prepare them with a suitable sub-
mission to his holy will. In June next ensuing, a great thunder-storm
arose out of the north-west ; after which (the hemisphere being serene)
* Pierpont was in error in regard to the year. The ship sailed in Jan-
uar}', 1646, New St}'le.
APPENDIX III. 541
about an hour before sunset, a ship of like dimensions with the aforesaid,
with her canvas and colors abroad (though the wind northerly) appeared
in the air coming up from our harbor's mouth, which lies southward from
the town, seemingly with her sails filled under a fresh gale, holding her
course north, and continuing under observation, sailing against the wind
for the space of half an hour.
" Many were drawn to behold this great work of God ; yea, the very
children cried out, ' There's a brave ship.' At length, crowding up as far
as there is usually water sufficient for such a vessel, and so near some of
the spectators, as that they imagined a man might hurl a stone on board
her, her main-top seemed to be blown off, but left hanging in the shrouds ;
then her mizzen-top; then all her masting seemed blown away by the
board: quickly after the hulk brought to a careen, she overset and so
vanished into a smoky cloud, which in some time dissipated, leaving, as
ever)'where else, a clear air. The admiring spectators could distinguish
the several colors of each part, the principal rigging, and such proportions,
as caused not only the generality of persons to say, ' This was the mould of
their ship, and this was her tragic end ; ' but Mr. Davenport also in public
declared to this effect, that God had condescended, for the quieting of
their afflicted spirits, this extraordinary account of his sovereign disposal
of those for whom so many fervent prayers were made continually. Thus
I am, sir, Your humble servant,
"James Pierpont."
APPENDIX IV.
SEATING THE MEETING-HOUSE.
« A T a general court held the loth of Marcli, 164!, the
/~\ names of people as they were seated in the meeting-
house were read in court, and it was ordered they should be
recorded, which was as followeth : —
"FIRST FOR THE MEN'S SEATS, VIZ.:
" TJie middle seats have to sit in them :
" I St seat, the governor and deput}' governor.
" 2d seat, Mr. Malbon, magistrate.
**3d seat, Mr. Evance, Mr. Bracey, Mr. Francis Newman,
Mr. Gibbard.
" 4th seat, Goodman Wigglesworth, Bro. Atwater, Bro. Seeley,
Bro. Miles.
" 5 th seat, Bro. Crane, Bro. Gibbs, Mr. Caffinch, Mr. Ling,
Bro. Andrews.
" 6th seat, Bro. Davis, Goodman Osborne, Anthony Thomp-
son, Mr. Browning, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Higginson.
" 7th seat, Bro. Camfield, Mr. James, Bro. Benham, \Vm.
lliompson, Bro. Lindon, Bro. Martin.
"8th seat, Jno. Meigs, Jno. Cooper, Peter Brown, \Vm.
Peck, Jno. Gregor}', Nicholas Elsey.
"9th seat, Edw. Bannister, Jno. Harriman, Benja. Wilmot,
Jar\-is Boykin, Arthur Halbidge.
54a
APPENDIX IV. 543
" In the cross seats at the end.
" I St seat, Mr. Pell, Mr. Tuttle, Bro. Fowler.
" 2d seat, Thom. Nash, Mr. Allerton, Bro. Perry.
" 3d seat, Jno. Nash, David Atwater, Thom. Yale.
4th seat, Robert Johnson, Thom. Jeffrey, John Punderson.
5 th seat, Thom. Munson, Jno. Livermore, Roger Ailing,
Joseph Nash, Sam. Whitehead, Thomas James.
'* In the other little seat, John Clarke, Mark Pearce.
" In the seats on the side, for men.
" I St, Jeremy Whitnell, Wm. Preston, Thom. Kimberley,
Thom. Powell.
" 2d, Daniel Paul, Richard Beckley, Richard Mansfield,
James Russell.
'* 3d, Wm. Potter, Thom. Lamson, Christopher Todd, Wil-
liam Ives.
"4th, Hen. Glover, Wm. Thorp, Matthias Hitchcock,
Andrew Low.
" On the other side of the door.
" I St, John Moss, Luke Atkinson, Jno. Thomas, Abraham
Bell.
" 2d, George Smith, John Wakefield, Edw. Patteson, Richard
Beach.
" 3d, John Bassett, Timothy Ford, Thom. Knowles, Robert
Preston.
"4th, Richd. Osborne, Robert Hill, Jno. Wilford, Henry
Gibbons.
" 5 th, Francis Brown, Adam NicoUs, Goodman Leeke,
Goodman Dayton.
" 6th, Wm. Gibbons, John Vincent, Thomas Wheeler, John
Brockett
544 APPENDIX IV.
"SECONDLY FOR THE WOMEN'S SEATS.
" In Oie middle.
" I St seat, old Mrs. Eaton.
" 2d seaty Mrs. Malbon, Mrs. Gregson, Mrs. Davenport, ^
Hooke.
" 3d seat, Elder Newman's wife, Mrs. Lamberton, Mrs.
Turner, Mrs. Brewster.
"4th seat. Sister Wakeman, Sister Gibbard, Sister Gilbert,
Sster Miles.
" 5th seat, Mr. Francis Newman's wife, Sister Gibbs, Sister
Crane, Sister Tuttle, Sister Atwater.
" 6th seat, Sister Seeley, Mrs. Caffinch, Mrs. Pern', Sister
Davis, Sister Cheever, Jno. Nash's wife.
" 7th seat, David Atwater's wife. Sister Clarke, Mrs. Yale,
Sister Osborne, Sister Thompson.
"8th seat, Sister Wigglesworth, Goody Johnson, Goody
Camfield, Sister Punderson, Goody Meigs, Sister Gregory.
"9th seat. Sister Todd, Sister Boykin, \Vm. Potter's wife.
Matthias Hitchcock's wife, Sister Cooper.
" In the cross seats at the end.
" ist, Mrs. Bracey, Mrs. Evance.
" 2d, Sister Fowler, Sister Ling, Sister Allerton.
" 3d, Sister Jeffrey, Sister Rutherford, Sister Livermore.
" 4th, Sister Preston, Sister Benham, Sister Mansfield.
" 5th, Sister Ailing, Goody Bannister, Sister Kimberley,
Goody Wilmot, Sister WTiitnell, Mrs. Higginson.
"/« the little cross seat.
" Sister Potter the midwife, and old Sister Nash.
APPENDIX IV. 545
" In the seats on the side.
" I St seat, Sister Powell, Goody Lindon, Mrs. James.
"2d seat, Sister Whitehead, Sister Munson, Sister Beckley,
Sister Martin.
"3d seat, Sister Peck, Joseph Nash's wife, Peter Brown's
wife. Sister Russell.
"4th seat, Sister Ives, Sister Bassett, Sister Patteson, Sister
Elsey.
" In the seats on the other side of the door.
" ist seat, Jno. Thomas's wife, Goody Knowles, Goody
Beach, Goody Hull.
" 2d seat, Sister Wakefield, Sister Smith, Goody Moss, James
Clarke's wife.
" 3d seat. Sister Brockett, Sister Hill, Sister Clarke, Goody
Ford.
"4th seat, Goody Osborne, Goody Wheeler, Sister Nicolls,
Sister Brown."
Nine years later (Feb. 11, 165^) the names of people as fO^v
they were seated in the meeting-house were again recorded as
follows : —
" The long seats in the middUyfor men.
" I . The governor and the deputy governor.
" 2. Mr. Newman, magistrate.
3. Mr. Wakeman, Mr. Gibbard, John Gibbs, William Davis.
4. William Judson, Mr. Goodenhouse, Mr. Mullener, John
Nash.
"5. Henry Lindon, William Andrews, John Cooper, Roger
Ailing, William Thompson.
" 6. Thorn. Munson, Sam. Whitehead, William Potter, Math.
Moulthrop, Jno. Peakin, John Harriman, Christopher Todd.
"7. Jno. Benhaip, Jarvis Boykin, Nich. Elsey, Ro. Tal-
madge, Jer. How, Jno. Thompson, James Bishop.
546 APPENDIX IV.
a
8. Jno. Moss, Jno. Brockett, Thos. Morris, Andrew Low,
Thos. Wheeler, Rich. Miles, jun., Jno. Thompson, jiin.
"9. William Gibbons, William Paine, Jno. Winston, Eldw.
Parker, Edward Preston.
" 77i^ cross seats at upper end.
" I. Mr. Tuttle, Mr. Jno. Davenport, William Fowler, Mr.
Allerton, sen.
" 2. Mr. Caffinch, David Atwater, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Yale.
" 3. Thomas Jeffrey, Jno. Punderson, Mr. Augur, Mr. DanieL
" 4. William Peck, William Bradley, Thomas Mullener.
" 5. Jos. Nash, William Russell, Jer. Osborne, Geo. Con-
stable, Rich. Gregson, Francis Brown, Allen Ball, Thomas
Johnson.
" In the iittie seat.
" Mr. Bowers, Thom. Kimberley.
-" In the seats on the side^ on both sides of the door,
" I. Thomas Powell, James Russell, John Hodson, Joseph.
Alsop.
" 2. Richard Beckley, Henry Glover, John Chidsey, Thom.
Mix.
" 3. Abraham Doolittle, Matthias Hitchcock, John Jones,
Thom. Lamson.
" 4. Geo. Smith, John Thomas, James Qarke, Geo. Pardee.
" 5. Benj. Wilmot, Edwa. Hitchcock, Edwa. Patteson, Robert
Hill.
"6. John Hall, Jno. Wakefield, Timothy Ford, Matthew
Rowe.
" 7. Nathaniel Merriman, John Tuttle, Thom. Barnes, Peter
Mallory.
" 8. William Bassett, John Benham, Martin Tichener, Philip
Leeke.
" 9. Edward Camp, John Johnson, William Holt, Isaac White-
head.
APPENDIX IV. 547
u
Against the soldiers^ seats.
" I. Jno. Sacket, James Eaton, Ralph Lines, Isaac Beecher,
Abra. Kimberley.
"2. John Ailing, Edward Perkins, Sam. Marsh, Joseph
Benham.
" 3, Henry Morrell, Sam. Hodskins, William 61ayden«
" On the bench before the little seat^
" Henry Gibbons, Jno. Vincent.
" Before the governor^ s seat.
" Rob. Seeley, Rob. Johnson, Tho. Mitchell, Thomas Wheeler,
senior.
''Before Mr. Gilbert's seat
"Jer. Whitnell, Rich. Johnson, Ephraim Pennington, Rich.
Hull.
''Before Mr. Tuttle's seat.
" Rob. Pigg, William TTiorp, Henry Bristow, Thom. Beamont.
" Before the pillar.
" Edward Watson.
"THE WOMEN'S SEATS.
" The long seats.
" The first as it was.
" In the second, Mrs. Newman added.
" 3. Mrs. Goodenhouse, Mrs. Gilbert, Mrs, Miles, Mrs. Wake-
man.
" 4. Mrs. Gibbard, Mrs. Tuttle, Goodwife Gibbs, Goodwife
Davis.
" 5. Jno. Nash's wife, Mrs. Caffinch, Mrs. Rutherford, Good-
wife Lindon, Da. Atwater's wife.
548 APPENDIX IV,
"6. Goodwife Punderson, Mrs. Yale, Rob. Johnson's wife,
Goodwife Seeley, Goodwife Todd, Goody Bradley.
" 7. Goodwife Camp, Goo. Osborne, Goo. Thompson, Goo.
Moulthrop, Goo. Potter, Will. Russell's wfe.
" 8. Goodw. Talmadge, Goodw. Parker, Goodw. Bishop,
Goodw. WTieeler, Goodw. Hitchcock, Goodw. Clarke.
"9. Goodw. Wilmot, sen., Goodw. Wilmot, jun., Goodve.
Brockett, Goodw. HaU, Goodw. Paine.
" Cross seats.
" I. Mrs. Allerton the elder, Mr. Goodyear's daughters.
" 2. Mrs. Bowers, Goodw. Fowler, Goodw. Jefl&^y.
" 3. Goodwife Preston, senior, William Peck's wife, Goodw.
Kimberley the elder.
" 4. Sam. Whithead's wife, Goodw. Benham the elder, Jer.
Howe's wife.
" 5. Widow Peck, Tho. Johnson's wife, Goodw. Ball, Goodw.
Mitchell, Goody Hull, Goodw. Thorp, Goodw. Wakefield.
" In the short seat.
" Goodw. Nash the elder, Roger Alling's wife.
" In the seat before them,
" Goodw. Pigg, Goodw. Browne.
"/« the side seats all along,
" I. Mrs. Daniell, Mrs. Mullener, Mrs. Powell, Goodw.
Chidsey.
" 2. Goodw. Mix, Mrs. Hodson, Goodw. Patteson, Goodw.
Beckley.
" 3. Goodw. Moss, Goodw. Thomas. Goodw. Doolittle,
Goodw. Alsop.
" 4. Goodw. Bassett, Goodw. Smith, Goodw. Gibbons, Goodw.
Morris.
APPENDIX IV. 549
" 5. Goodw. Ford, Goodw. Rowe, Goodw. Winston, Goodw.
HUl.
" 5. Goodw. Tichener, Goodw. Leeke, Goodw. Pennington,
Goodw. Pardee.
" 6. Goodw. Barnes, Goodw. Merriman, Jno. Benham's wife,
Edwa. Camp's wife.
" 8. Goodw. Mallory, Goodw. Atkinson, Goodw. Marsh,
Goodw. Hodskins.
" Before Mrs, Eaton's seat,
" Goodw. Harriman, Goodw. Glover, Goodw. Andrews, James
Russell's wife.
" Before the piUar.
" Goodw. Low, Goodw. Elsey.
" Before Dea, Miles* seat,
" Goodw. Whitnell, Goodw. Watson, Goodw. Halbidge.
" Before Mrs, Ailertoh's seat,
" Goodw. Judson, Goodw. Mansfield, Goodw. Cooper.
" Permitted to sit in the alley {upon their desire) for conven-
ience of hearing,
" Goodw. Beecher the elder, Goodw. Munson, Goodw. Boy-
kin, Goodw. Beamont, old Goodw. Johnson."
Another seating of the meeting-house is recorded Feb. 20, fCOl^
i66f
" In the long seats for men,
" I. Mr. Gilbert, with such other as may be called to ma-
gistracy.
" 2. Mr. Jones, Mr. John Davenport, Jr., Mr. Yale, Mr.
William Gibbard.
5 so APPENDIX IV,
**3. Mr. Goodenhouse, Mr. Tuttle, William Judson, John
GibbSy Lieut Nash.
"4. Mr. Hodson, William Andrews, John Cooper, Rc^r
Ailing, James Bishop.
'' 5. William Thompson, William Potter, Matthew Moulthrop,
Christopher Todd, William Bradley, John Harriman.
" 6. Henry Glover, Nicholas Elsey, John Moss, John Thomp-
son, John Brockett, John Winston, Thomas Mix.
" 7. Jeremy Howe, Nathaniel Merriman, Thomas Barnes,
George Smith, Timothy Ford, Ralph Lines, William Gibbons.
" 8. Robert Hill, William Meeker, Ephraim Howe, Thomas
Harrison, Matthew Rowe, John Johnson, Joseph Mansfield.
" 9. Edward Parker, Thomas Lamson, William Trowbridge
John AUing, Edward Preston.
" In the short seats at the upper end,
" I. Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Mullener, John Punderson, David
Atwater.
" 2. Mr. Field, Mr. Augur, Mr. Nathanael Street, Ensign
Munson.
"3. Sergt Whitehead, Sergt. Russell, Joseph Alsop, John
Chidsey.
"4. Thomas Trowbridge, Thomas Johnson, Jeremiah Os-
borne, Allen Ball.
" In the long seat next the wall.
" John Gilbert, Geo. Pardee, Wm. Holt
" In the little seat.
" Thomas Kimberley, James RusselL
" Before this seat.
" Hen. Gibbons, Wm. Bassett
AFPEITDIX IV, 551
" In the side seats above fhe door,
"Thos. Powell, William Paine, James Clarke, Abraham
Doolittle.
" 2. Matthias Hitchcock, Andrew Low, Benj. Wilmot, John
Thomas, Humph. Spinage.
" 3. Edward Patteson, John Tuttle, Richard Sperry.
"4. John Sacket, Sam. Marsh, Peter Mallery, Robert Foot.
*' Below the door.
" I. John Potter, Abraham Dickerman, Isaac Beecher, Thos.
Kimberley, Jr.
" 2. Jonathan Tuttle, James Eaton, John Clark, Isaac Turner.
" 3. John Benham, Geo. Ross, Martin Tichener, Philip
Leeke.
"4. Anthony Elcot, Joseph Benham, Richard Newman,
Joseph Potter.
"5. Henry Morrell, Samuel Hodskins, John Brown, Wm.
Pringle.
^^ Against the soldiers' seats,
"i. Sam. Blackley, Will. Wooden, Hen. Humiston, Wm,
Wilmot.
" 2. Ellis Mew, James Brooks, John Osbill, James Dennison.
" 3. Wm. Chatterton, John Ware.
" Before the governor^ s seat,
" Thos. Wheeler, Wm. Thorp, Richard Hull, Francis Brown.
" Before Deacon Miles his seat,
"Jeremiah Whitnell, Thos. Morris, Richard Johnson.
''On the steps,
"John Jackson.
552 APPENDIX IV.
"Before Mr. Rutherford ^s seat.
" Hen. Bristow, John HaU, Thos. Beamont, Hen. Lines.
"Before the pillar.
"Jeremiah Hull, Edward Perkins.
it
In the long seats for women.
" I. Mrs. Goodyear, Mrs. GObert.
" 2. Mrs. Gregson, Mrs. Davenport, Mrs. Street, Mrs. Jones.
" 3. Sister Miles, Sister Peck, Sister Lindon, Sister Tuttle,
Sister Gibbard.
" 4. Sister Davis, Sister Gibbs, Sister Rutherford, Sister Hod-
son, Sister Nash.
"5. Sister Atwater, Sister Johnson, sen.. Sister Judson, Sister
Bishop, Sister Mix.
" 6. Sister Bradley, Sister Todd, Sister Moss, Sister Moul-
throp, Goodwife Potter, Wm. Russell's wife.
" 7. Sister Osborne, Sister Thompson, Sister Talmadge, Sister
Brockett, Sister Smith, Sister Doolittle.
" 8. Goodwife Mansfield, Good wife Hitchcock, Goodwife
Harrison, Sister Merriman, Sister Barnes, John Johnson's wife.
" 9. Ephraim Howe's wife, Ralph Lines's wife, John Potter's
wife, Goodwife Spinage, Benj. Wilmot's wife, John Alling's wife.
" In the short seats at the upper end.
" I. Mrs. Allerton, Mrs. Mullener, Mrs. Yale, Hannah Lam-
berton.
" 2. Sistei Punderson, Sister Kimberly, Sister Elsey.
"3. Thomas Trowbridge's wife, Wm. Trowbridge's wife,
Sister Thorp, Sister Daniel.
" 4. Sister Howe, Thos. Johnson's wife. Sister Brown, Good-
wife Paine.
APPENDIX IV, 553
"/« the long seat next the wall,
" Sister Mitchell, Sister Low, Sister Holt, Sister Hall, Sister
Morris, Goodwife Ford, Sister Jackson.
" In the little short seat.
" Sister Ailing, Sister Parmelee.
" Before this seat,
" Sister Pennington, Sister Bristow.
" In the side seats above the door,
" I. Sister Powell, Sister Jones, Sister Chidsey, Goodwife
Alsop.
" 2. Sister Whitehead, Sister Humiston, Sister Bassett.
"3. Goodwife Pardee, Sister Thomas, Goodwife Gibbons,
Goodwife Rowe.
"4. Goodwife Meeker, Sister Marsh, John Tattle's wife,
Thos. Tuttle's wife.
" Below the door,
" Sister Tichener, Sister Leeke, Goodwife Dickerman, Good-
wife Foot.
" 2. John Benham's wife, Joseph Benham's wife, Edward
Preston's wife, Goodwife Hodskins.
" 3. Goodwife Mallery, Hen. Lines*s wife, John Brown's wife,
Goodwife Beecher.
" 4. Goodwife Newman, Goodwife Humiston, Joseph Pot-
ter's wife, Goodwife Wooden.
" Before Deacon Peck's seat.
" Sister Parker, Sister Beamont, Goodwife Ball.
^* Before Mrs. Goodyear^ s seat.
"Sister Harriman, Sister Glover, Sister Munson, James
Russell's wife.
554 APPENDIX IV.
" Before Mrs. AUertotCs seat.
*' Sister Field, Sister Clark, Goodwife Speny.
'' Before the pillar.
" Sister Cooper.
" Sister Andrews and Sister Boykin had liberty, for conven-
ience of hearing, to sit in the alley."
APPENDIX V.
HOPKINS GRAMMAR SCHOOL.
[The full text of Mr. DaTcnport's Deed of Tnut mentioned oo p. 39X.]
To all Christian people to whom these presents shall come, I
John Davenport, sen., pastor of the Church of Christ at New
Haven in New England, send greeting :
Whereas Edward Hopkins, Esquire, sometime of Hartford in
the colony of Connecticut in New England aforesaid, governor,
and since in Old England deceased, by his last will and testament
in writing, bearing date the 7th of March, 1657, did give and
bequeath to his father-in-law Theophilus Eaton, Esquire, then
governor of New Haven colony, the said John Davenport, Mr.
John CuUick and Mr. William Goodwin sometime of Hartford
aforesaid, all the residue and remainder of his estate in New
England (his due.debts being first paid and legacies discharged),
and also the sum of ^^500 out of his estate in Old England
within six months after the decease of his wife, Mrs. Anne
Hopkins, by the advice of Mr. Robert Thompson and Mr.
Francis Willoughby to be made over and conveyed into the
hands of the said trustees in New England, in full assurance of
their trust and faithfulness in dispose of the said remainder
of his estate in New England and of the said ^^500 in Old
England, according to the true intent and purpose of him, the
said Edward Hopkins, declared in his said will, viz., for the en-
couragement and breeding up of hopeful youths, both at the
grammar school and college, for the public service of the coun-
55S
5S6 APPENDIX V,
try in these foreign plantations, as in and by the will doth and
may more fully and at large appear.
And whereas the said Mr. William Goodwin and the said
John Davenport, the only surviving trustees of the above-named
Edward Hopkins, by an instrument or writing under our hands
and seals bearing 'date the 27th of April, 1664, have agreed
upon an equitable division, settlement, and dispose of the said
remainder of estate above mentioned, received or secured by
us severally, or our attomies, and of the said ;;^500, to the use
or uses aforesaid ; whereby the sum of ^^412, piart of the said
remainder besides the full moiety or half part of the said ^500,
when it shall become due and received as aforesaid, is by me,
the said John Davenport, to be disposed of according to the true
intent and meaning of the said testator, as in the said instrument
or writing agreed upon : Know ye therefore that I, the said
John Davenport, in pursuance of the said trust in me reposed,
and that the grammar school or college at New Haven already
founded and begun may be provided for, maintained, and con-
tinued for the encouragement and bringing up of hopeful
youths in the languages and other good literature, for the public
use and senice of the country, according to the sincere and
true intent of the donor as above mentioned, and to no other
use, intent, or purpose whatsoever, do give, grant, infeofT, and
confirm, and have by these presents given, granted, infeoffed,
and confirmed unto Mr. William Jones, assistant of the colony
of Connecticut, the reverend Mr. Nicholas Street, teacher of the
Church of Christ at New Haven, Mr. Matthew Gilbert, Mr.
John Davenport, jun. and James Bishop, commissioned magis-
trates, Deacon William Peck, and Roger Ailing, and to their
successors to be nominated, appointed, and chosen as hereafter
in these presents is ordered and directed, the said sum of ^41 2,
and the said moiety or half-part of the said ^500, and all and
ever)' other sum or sums of money, or other estate which is or
may be due by virtue of the aforesaid grant or agreement for-
APPENDIX V. 557
ever, under the name or title of the Committee of Trustees for
the said trust, invested hereby with full power and authority to
improve and dispose of the said sums or estate as before ex-
pressed, and to oversee, regulate, order, and direct the said
grammar or collegiate school according to their best skill, under-
standing, and ability, in pursuance of the said trust and ends,
in full assurance that they, the said committee and their suc-
cessors regularly chosen and appointed, shall so manage and
dispose of the said sums or other estate herein mentioned, to the
true ends, purposes, and intents of the said donor, in his last will
and testament declared and expressed, and to the true meaning
and intent of me, the said John Davenport, in these presents
before declared and directed, or to be hereby further declared
and directed, and not otherwise : that is to say, for the pur-
chasing a farm or farms for a yearly revenue for the school-
master, or building such dwelling-house for the schoolmaster
as the said committee, their successors, or the major part of
them, shall judge necessary and convenient ; and the said house
and present school-house (being granted and confirmed by the
said town of New Haven for the use of the said school) to
uphold, maintain, and keep in good and sufficient repair from
time to time, out of the rents, issues, and profits of the said
money or estate so given and granted as aforesaid. And the
said committee, or the major part of them, or of their suc-
cessors, meeting together from time to time, in some convenient
place and agreeing, are hereby fully empowered and authorized
to consult, determine, and conclude, act, and do in the prem-
ises as is above ordained, appointed, and directed, and to
conclude, act, and do, all other thing or things thereabouts in
pursuance of the said trust and the true meaning and intent
of the foresaid donor, as fully and amply as I, the said John Dav-
enport, by virtue of the trust to me committed in and by the
said will, or by any other way or means whatsoever might law-
fully do in the dispose of the said estate, all, or any part of it,
5S8 APPENDIX V.
to the ends aforesaid ; and do further invest them^ the said
committee and their successors, and the major part of them,
with full power, authority, and trust, to order, regulate, and
direct the said collegiate school, by such laws and rules as are
by me provided, or shall be further as additional by them, or
the major part of them, judged necessary and expedient for the
better ordering, regulating, and directing of the said school for
the advancement of learning and good government therein ;
and to make choice of such schoolmaster (and usher, if need
be) as they shall approve of to be sufficiently qualified to
undertake such a charge, and able to instruct and teach the
three learned languages, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, so far as
shall be necessary to piepare and fit youth for the college ; and
to state and allow out of the said rents and profits such yearly
stipend and salary toward his or their encouragement and main-
tenance as they, the said committee, or the major part of them,
or of their successors, shall judge meet and convenient ; and
also upon just grounds, either insufficiency, wilful neglect of
trust, scandal, or the like causes, to exclude or remove him or
them upon due proof and conviction of such offences, and to
provide, to nominate, and choose some other fit person or per-
sons in his or their room and place. And that there may be a
certain and orderly succession of able and fit persons to manage
the several trusts herein before mentioned in the room and place
of any of the said committee or trustees before named, that
shall die or remove his or their dwelling from New Haven afore-
said, the said committee, or the major part of them surviving,
shall immediately, or at furthest within three months after, choose
such other person or persons of known integrity and faithful-
ness, to succeed in the room and place of any such person or
persons so d>ing or removing as aforesaid, that the work may
be carried on (in the said grammar or collegiate school) hereby
committed to them, that so learning may be duly encouraged
and furthered therein, in the training up of such hopeful youth
APPENDIX y. 559
as, in time, by the blessing of God jipon good endeavors, may
be fitted for public service in church and commonwealth, for
the upholding and promoting of the kingdom of our Lord
Jesus Christ in these parts of the earth, according to the true
and sincere desire and ends of the aforesaid Worthy Donor in
his said last will and testament mentioned and expressed. And
because I stand under an engagement to attend the will of the
said donor deceased, that his ends may be attained in the
dispose of his said legacy, if the said committee or their suc-
cessors shall find the said ends by this ^grant not attained at
New Haven, and that the said grammar or collegiate school
hereby endowed and provided for, should be dissolved and
wholly cease, I do obtest them by the will of the dead, which
no man may alter, and by the trust committed to me and
them, whereof we must give our account to the great Judge
of all, that this gift of the said Edward Hopkins, Esquire, de-
ceased, be by them the said committee wholly transferred and
disposed of elsewhere, where the said ends may be attained.
But if the true ends of the testator and of this settlement be
attained at New Haven, I stand firm to the place in this my
grant, reserving nevertheless to myself in all cases, matters, and
things respecting the hying out or improvement of the said
estate, as aforesaid, for the said school, full power of a negative
voice whilst it shall please God to continue my living and
abiding in this country, or any part of it, to hinder and prevent
any act or acts, thing or things, to be acted or done in or about
the premises, to the detriment of the said estate, or contrary
to the said trust to me committed and hereby transferred to the
said committee and their successors aforesaid, upon this further
condition, that the rent, profit, and improvement of the Oyster-
shell Field, containing by estimation forty acres, more or less,
formerly separated and reserved for the use and benefit of a
college at New Haven, and also one other field commonly
called Mrs. Eldred's lot, containing by estimation three acres
560 APPENDIX V,
more or less, be to the use of the said school at New Haven
forever settled, ratified, and confirmed by the said town accord-
ingly. And to prevent any further re-interruption which this
settlement by me made may meet with by reason of a former
grant of the abovesaid sum or sums of money and estate for
encouragement of a colony school at New Haven, made by a
memorandum in writing under my hand, containing sundry
particulars to that purpose, and bearing date the fourth day
of the fourth month, 1660, the same being registered in the
records of the then General Court, and by the said Court at
the time approved and accepted, as by the said records, page
260, doth appear, I therefore, the said John Davenport, in
regard that the said Court by their act bearing date the 5 th
of November, 1662, for sundry reasons therein alleged, did lay
down and discharge the said school, and withdraw the yearly
exhibition by them formerly allowed, whereby (the said school
being so dissolved) the said grant by me made became null
and void : I do therefore hereby declare the same to be
null and void accordingly, any thing in the said writing or
memorandum to the contrary notwithstanding. And the grant
herein made of the premises to be good against the same, and
against all or any other pretences whatsoever, according to my
true intent and meaning herein before declared and expressed.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal the
eighteenth day of the second month, commonly called April,
one thousand six hundred, sixty and eight.
John Davenport, Senior.
Signed, sealed, and delivered by the Reverend Mr. John
Davenport, senior, as his act and deed, in the presence of
BENjA>riN Ling,
John Hodson.
This is a true record of the original examined by me.
James Bishop, Recorder.
APPENDIX VL
NEW HAVEN'S REMONSTRANCE.
THE Remonstrance or Declaration sent to the General
Assembly of Connecticut Colony from this Court is as
follows : —
Gentlemen, — The professed grounds and ends of your and
our coming into these parts are not unknown, being plainly ex-
. pressed in the prologue to that solemn confederation entered
into by the four colonies of New England, printed and published
to the world, namely: to advance the kingdom of our Lord
Jesus Christ, and to enjoy the liberties of the gospel in purity
with peace, for which we left our dear native country and were
willing to undergo the difficulties we have since met with in this
wilderness, yet fresh in our remembrance ; being the only ends
we still pursue, having hitherto found by experience so much of
the presence of God ^vith us, and of his goodness and compas-
sion towards us in so doing for these many years. Yet, consid-
ering how unanswerable our returns have been to God, how
unfruitful, unthankful, and unholy under so much means of
grace and such liberties, we cannot but lament the same, judge
ourselves and justify God, should he now at last (after so long
patience towards us) bring desolating judgments upon us, and
make us drink of the dregs of that cup of indignation he hath
put into the hands of his people in other parts of the world, or
suffer such contentions (in just displeasure) to arise among us
as may hasten our calamity and increase our woe, which we
pray the Lord in mercy to prevent. And, whereas, in the
561
S62 APPENDIX VI.
pursuance of said ends, and upon other religious and ci\-il
considerations, as the security of the interest of each colony
within its self in ways of righteousness and peace, and all and
every of the said colonies from the Indians and other enemies,
they did judge it to be their bounden duty for mutual strength
and helpfulness for the future in all their said concernments,
to enter into a consociation among themselves, thereupon fully
agreed and concluded by and between the parties or jurisdic-
tions in divers and sundry articles, and at last ratified as a j>er-
petual confederation by their several subscriptions, whereunto
we conceive ourselves bound to adhere, until with satisfaction
to our judgments and consciences we see our duty, with like
unanimous consent of the confederates, orderly to recede, leav-
ing the issue unto the most wise and righteous God.
As for the Patent upon your petition granted to you by his
Majesty, as Connecticut Colony, so far, and in that sense, we
object not against it, much less against his Majesty's act in so
doing, the same being a real encouragement to other of his
subjects to obtain the like favour upon their humble petition to
his Royal Highness in the protection of their persons and pur-
chased rights and interests, is also a ground of hope to us.
But, if the line of your Patent doth circumscribe this Colony
by your contrivement, without our cognizance or consent, or
regard to the said confederation on your parts, we have and
must still testify against it, as not consistent (in our judgment)
with brotherly love, righteousness and peace. And that this Col-
ony (for so long time a confederate jurisdiction, distinct from
yours and the other colonies) is taken in under the administra-
tion of the said Patent in your hands, and so its form being
dissolved, and distinction ceasing, there being no one line or
letter in the Patent expressing his Majest}'*s pleasure that way,
although it is your sense of it, yet we cannot so apprehend, of
which we having already given our grounds at large in writing,
we shall not need to say much more, nor have we met with
APPENDIX VI. 563
any argumentative or rational convictions from you, nor do we
yet see cause to be of another mind. As for your proceedings
upon pretence of the Patent towards us, or rather against us, in
taking sundry inhabitants of this Colony under your protection
and government, who (as you say) offered themselves, from
which a good conscience and the obligation under which most of
them stood to this Colony should have restrained them, without
the consent of the body of this Colony first had, and in concur-
rence with them, upon mature deliberation and conviction of duty
yet wanting, we cannot but again testify against as disorderly in
them, and which admission on your parts we conceive your
Christian prudence might have easily suspended, for prevention
of that great offence to the consciences of your confederate breth-
ren and those sad consequences which have followed, disturbing
the peace of our towns, destroying our comforts, and hazard of
our lives and liberties by their frequent threats and unsufferable
provocations, hath been and is with us a matter of complaint
both to God and man ; especially when we consider that thus
you admitted them, and put power into their hands, before you
had made any overture to us or had any treaty with us about so
weighty a business, as if you were in haste to make us misera-
ble, as indeed in these things we are at this day.
And seeing upon the answer returned to your propositions
made by you afterwards of joining with you in your govern-
ments, finding ourselves so already dismembered, and the
weighty grounds and reasons we then presented to you, we
could not prevail so far with you as to procure a respite of your
further proceedings until Mr. Winthrop's return from England,
or the grant of any time that way, which was thought but rea-
sonable by some of yourselves, and the like seldom denied in
war to very enemies, we saw it then high time and necessary
(fearing these beginnings) to appeal unto his Majesty, and so
we did, concluding according to the law of appeals in all cases
and among all nations, that the same (upon your allegiance to
564 APPENDIX VL
his Majesty) would have obliged you to forbear all further pro-
cess in this business, for our own parts resolving (notwithstand-
ing all that we had formerly suffered) to sit down patient undei
the same, waiting upon God for the issue of our said app>eal.
But seeing that notwithstanding all that we had presented to
you by word and writing, notwithstanding our appeal to his
Majesty, notwithstanding all that we have suffered (by means
of that power you had set up, viz., a constable at Stamford), of
which informations have been given you, yet you have gone
further to place a constable at Guilford, in like manner, over a
party tfiere, to the further disturbance of our peace and quiet,
a narrative whereof, and of the provocations and wrongs we
have met with at Stamford, we have received, attested to us by
divers witnesses, honest men, we cannot but on behalf of our
appeal to his Majesty, whose honor is highly concerned therein,
and of our just rights, but (as men exceedingly afflicted and
grieved) testify in the sight of God, angels, and men, against
these things ; our end therein being not to provoke or further
any offence, but rather, as a discharge of duty on our parts as
brethren and Christian confederates, to call upon you to take
some effectual course to ease and right us in a due redress of
the grievances you have caused by these proceedings, such,
and that after you had complimented us with large offers of
patent privileges, with desire of a treaty with us for union of our
colonies. And you know as your good words were kindly
accepted, so your motion was fairly answered by our commit-
tee, that in regard we were under an appeal to his Majesty,
that being limited by our freemen not to conclude any thing
for altering our distinct colony state and government without
their consent and without the approbation of the other con-
federate colonies, they were not in present capacity so to treat ;
but did little suspect such a design on foot against us, the effect
whereof quickly appeared at Guilford before mentioned. But
we shall say no more at this time, only to tell you, whatever we
APPENDIX VL 565
suffer by your means, we pray the Lord would help us to choose
it rather than to sin against our consciences, hoping the right-
eous God will in due time look upon our afHiction, and incline
his Majesty's heart to favor our righteous cause.
Subscribed in the name and by order of the General Court
of New Haven Colony. V James Bishop,
Secretary.
New Haven, May 6, i665.
APPENDIX VII.
NEW HAVEN'S CASE STATED.
[ To tht honored John IVinihrop, Esq^ Governor^ or to the honored
Major Mason^ Deputy Governor of Connecticut Colony ^ to be
communicated to the honored the General Assembly for the said
Colony^
Honored and Beloved in the Lord, — We, the General
Court of New Haven Colony, being sensible of the wrongs
which this Colony hath lately suffered by your unjust pretences
and encroachments upon our just and proper rights, have
unanimously consented, though with grief of heart, being com-
pelled thereunto, to declare unto you and unto all whom the
knowledge thereof may concern, what yourselves do or may
know to be true, as followeth,
I. That the first beginners of these plantations by the sea-
side in these western parts of New England, being engaged to
sundry friends in London and in other places about London,
(who purposed to plant, some with them in the same town, and
others as near to them as they might,) to provide for themselves
some convenient places by the sea-side, arrived at Boston in the
Massachusetts (having a special right in their Patent, two of
them being joint purchasers of it with others, and one of them
a patentee and one of the assistants chosen for the New Elng-
land Company in London,) where they abode all the winter
following, but not finding there a place suitable for their pur-
pose, were persuaded to view these parts, which those that
\iewed approved, and before their removal, finding that no
566
APPENDIX VII. 567
English were planted in any place from the fort (called Say-
brook) to the Dutch, purposed to purchase of the Indians, the
natural proprietors of those lands, that whole tract of land by
the sea-coast for themselves and those that should come to
them, which they also signified to their friends at Hartford in
Connecticut Colony, and desired that some fit men firom thence
might be employed in that business, at their proper cost and
charges who wrote to them. Unto which letter having received
a satisfying answer, they acquainted the court of magistrates of
Massachusetts Colony with their purpose to remove and the
grounds of it, and with their consent began a plantation in a
place situated by the sea, called by the Indians Quillipiac,
which they did purchase of the Indians the true proprietors
thereof, for themselves and their posterity, and have quietly
possessed the same about six and twenty years, and have buried
great estates in buildings, fencings, clearing the ground, and in
all sorts of husbandry, without any help from Connecticut or
dependence upon them. And by voluntary consent among
themselves they settled a civil court and government among
themselves, upon such fundamentals as were established in
Massachusetts by allowance of their patent, whereof the then
governor of the Bay, the Right Worshipful Mr. Winthrop sent
us a copy to improve for our best advantage. These funda-
mentals all the inhabitants of the said Quillipiac approved, and
bound themselves to submit unto and maintain, and chose
Theophilus Eaton, Esq. ; to be their governor, with as good
right as Connecticut settled their government among them-
selves and continued it above twenty years without any patent.
2. That when the help of Mr. Eaton our governor and some
others from Quillipiac was desired for ending of a contro-
versy at VV^ethersfield, a town in Connecticut Colony ; it being
judged necessary for peace that one party should remove their
[371] dwellings, upon equal satisfying terms proposed, the
governor, magistrates, etc., of Connecticut offered for their part
APPENDIX VIL 569
sea-side, to vindicate the right of the English, without consult-
ing Connecticut, or seeking their concurrence therein.
5. That in the year 1643, upon weighty considerations, an
union of four distinct colonies was agreed upon by all New
England (except Rhode Island) in their several general courts,
and was established by a most solemn confederation, whereby
they bound themselves mutually to preserve unto each colony
its entire jurisdiction within itself respectively, and to avoid the
putting of two into one by any act of their own without consent
of the commissioners from the four united colonies, which were
from that time and still are called and known by the title of the
four United Colonies of New England ; of these colonies New
Haven was and is one. And in this solemn confederation
Connecticut joined with the rest and with us.
6. That in the year 1644, the General Court for New Haven
Colony, then sitting in the town of New Haven, agreed unani-
mously to send to England for a Patent, and in the year 1645,
committed the procuring of it to Mr. Gregson*, one of our ma-
gistrjltes, who entered upon his voyage in January that year from
New Haven, furnished with some beaver in order thereunto as
we suppose, but by the providence of God, the ship and all the
passengers and goods were lost at sea in their passage toward
England, to our great [loss] and the frustration of that design
for that time ; after which the troubles in England put a stop
to our proceedings therein. This was done with the consent
and desire of Connecticut to concur with New Haven therein ;
whereby the difference of times and of men's spirits in them
may be discovered, for then the magistrates of Connecticut
with consent of their General Court knowing our purposes,
desired to join with New Haven in procuring that patent
for common privileges to both in their distinct jurisdictions,
and left it to Mr Eaton's wisdom to have the patent framed
accordingly. But now they seek to procure a patent without
the concurrence of New Haven, and contrary to our minds
570 APPEA'D/X VII.
expressed before this patent was sent for, and to their *
promise, and to the terms of the confederation ; and with
sufficient warrant from their patent they have invaded
right, and seek to involve New Haven under Connecticut jii
diction.
7. That in the year 1646, when the commissionei^ firet ]
at New Haven, Kieft, the then Dutch governor, by letters
postulated with the commissioners, by what warrant they me
New Haven without hb consent, seeing it and all by the :
coast belonged to his principals in Holland, and to the Lc
the States General, 'fhe answer to that letter was framed
Mr. Eaton, governor of New Haven and then president of
commission, approved by all the commissioners, and sent
their names, with their consent, to the then Dutch goven
who never replied thereunto.
8. That this colony in the reign of the late King Charles
first, received a letter from the committee of Lords and C<
mons for foreign plantations, then sitting at Westminster, wh
letter was delivered to our governor Mr. Eaton, for freeing
several distinct colonies of New Elngland from molestations
the appealing of troublesome spirits unto England, wher
they declared that they had dismissed all causes depend
before them from New England, and that they advised
inhabitants to submit to their respective governments th
established, and lo acquiesce when their causes shall be th
lieard and determined ; as it is to be seen more largely
pressed in the original, which we have subscribed.
Your assured friends,
Pem BROOK, Manchester, Warwick,
W. Say & Seal, Fr. Dacre, etc, Denbigh.
In this order they subscribed their names with their own hai
which we have to show, and they itiscribed or directed
letter.
APPENDIX VII, 571
To our worthy friends ^ the governor and assistants of the
plantations of New Haven, in New England,
Whereby you may clearly see that the right honorable the
earl of Warwick and the lord viscount Say and Seal (lately one
of his majesty's that now is, King Charles the second his most
honorable privy council, as also the right honorable earl of
Manchester still is,) had no purpose, after New Haven Colony
situated by the sea-side was settled to be a distinct government,
that it should be put under the patent for Connecticut, whereof
they had only framed a copy, before any house was erected by
the sea-side from the fort to the Dutch, which yet was not
signed and sealed by the last king for a patent, nor had you
any patent till your agent Mr. Winthrop procured it about two
years since.
9. That in the year 1650, when the commissioners for the
four United Colonies of New England met at Hartford, the
now Dutch governor being then and there present, Mr. Eaton,
the then governor of New Haven Colony, complained of the
Dutch governor's encroaching upon our colony of New Haven,
by taking under his jurisdiction a township beyond Stamford,
called Greenwich. All the commissioners (as well for Con-
necticut as for the other colonies) concluded that Greenwich
and four miles beyond it belongs to New Haven jurisdiction,
whereunto the Dutch governor then yielded, and restored it to
New Haven Colony. Thus were our bounds westward settled
by consent of all.
10. That when the honored governor of Connecticut, John
Winthrop, Esq., had consented to undertake a voyage for Eng-
land to procure a patent for Connecticut, in the [year] 1661, a
friend warned him by letter not to have his hand in so un-
righteous an act, as so far to extend the line of their patent
that the colony of New Haven should be involved within it.
For answer thereunto, he was pleased to certify that friend in
572 APPENDIX VII.
two letters which he wrote from two several places before his
departure, that no such thing wjis intended, but rather the con-
trary, and that the magistrates had agreed and expressed in the
presence of some ministers, that if their line should reach us,
(which they knew not, the copy being in Englartd,) yet New
Haven Colony should be fU TuU Uberty to join with them or
not This agreement, so attested, made us secure, who else
could have procm«d a patent for ourselves, within our own
known bounds, according to purchase, without doing any wrong
to Connecticut in their just bounds and hmits.
1 1. That notwithstanding all the premises, in the year r66i,
when you had received your patent tmder his majesty's hand
and seal, contrary to your promise and solemn confederation
and to common equity, at your first general assembly (which
yet could not be called general without us, if we were under
your patent, seeing none of us were by you called thereunto,)
you agreed among yourselves to treat with New Haven Colony
about union, by your commissioners chosen for that end, within
two or three days after that assembly was dissolved, but before
the ending of that session you made an unrighteous breach in
our colony, by taking under your patent some of ours from
Stamford, and from Guilford, and from Southhold, contrary to
your engagements to New Haven Colony, and without our con-
sent or knowledge. This being thus done, some sent from you
to treat with us showed some of ours your patent, which being
read, they declared to yours that New Haven Colony is not at
all mentioned in your patent, and gave you some reasons why
they believed that the king did not intend to put this colony
under Connecticut without our desire or knowledge ; and they
added that you took a preposterous course in first dismembering
this colony, and after that treating with it about union, which is
as if one man purposing to treat with another about union first
cut off from him an arm and a leg and an ear, then to treat
with him about union. Re\'erend Mr. Stone also, the teacher
APPENDIX VII, 573
of the church at Hartford, was one of the committee, who
being asked what he thought of this action, answered that he
would not justify it.
12. After that conference, our committee sent, by order of
the General Court, by two of our magistrates and two of our
elders, a writing containing sundry other reasons for our not
joining with you, who also finding that you persisted in your
own will and way, declared to you our own resolution to appeal
to his majesty to explain his true intendment and meaning in
your patent, whether it was to subject this colony under it or
not ; being persuaded, as we still are, that it neither was or is
his royal will and pleasure to confound this colony with yours,
which would destroy the so long continued, and so strongly
settled distinction of the four United Colonies of New Eng-
land, without our desire or knowledge.
13. That accordingly we forthwith sent our appeals to be
humbly presented to his majesty by some friends in London,
yet out of our dear and tender respect to Mr. Winthrop's peace
and honor, some of us advised those friends to communicate
our papers first to honored Mr. Winthrop himself, to the end
that we might find out some effectual expedient to put a good
end to this uncomfortable difference between you and us ; else
to present our humble address to his majesty. Accordingly it
was done, and Mr. Winthrop stopped the proceeding of our
appeal by undertaking to our friends that matters should be
issued to our satisfaction, and in order thereunto he was
pleased to write a letter to Major Mason your deputy governor,
and the rest of the court of Connecticut Colony, from London,
dated March 3d, 1662, in these words : —
Gentlemen, — I am informed by some gentlemen who are authorized
to seek remedy here, that since you had a late patent there hath been
injury done to the government of Newhaven, and in particular at Guilford
and Stamford in admitting several of the inhabitants there unto freedom
with you, and appointing of&cers, which hath caused division in the said
574 APPENDIX VI L
towns, which may prove of dangerous consequence if not timely prevented,
though I do hope the rise of it is from misunderstanding and not in design
of prejudice to that colony, for whom I gave assurance to their friends
that their rights and interests should not be disquieted or prejudiced b\' the
patent. But if both governments would with unanimous agreement unite
in one, their friends judged it would be for advantage to both ; and farther,
I must let you know that testimony here doth affirm that I gave assurance
before authority here, that it was not intended to meddle with any town or
plantation that was settled under any other government Had it been any
otherwise intended or declared, it had been injurious in taking out the
patent not to have inserted a proportionable number of their names in it.
Now upon the whole, having had serious conference with their friends
authorized by them, and with others who are friends to both, to prevent
a tedious and chargeable trial and uncertain event here, I promised them
to give you speedily this representation, how far you are engaged, if any
injury hath been done by admitting of freemen, or appointing officers, or
any other intermeddling with New Haven Colony in one kind or other with-
out approbation of the governments, that it be forthwith recalled, and that
for the future there will be no imposing upon them nor admitting of any
members without mutual consent, but that all things be acted as lov-
ing, neighbouring colonies, as before such patent granted. And unto this
I judge you are obliged, I haveing engaged to their agents here that this
will be by you performed, and they have thereupon forborne to give you or
me any further trouble. But they do not doubt but upon future consider-
ation there may be such a right understanding between both governments
that a union and friendly joining may be established to the satisfaction of
all, which at my arrival I shall endeavor (God willing) to promote. Not
having more at present in this case, I rest.
Your humble servant
John Winthrop.
The copy of this letter was sent to Mr. Leete unsealed, with
Mr. Winthrop's consent, and was written by his own hand, and
the substance of this agreement between some of our friends in
London is fully attested by them in their letters to some of us.
Say not that Mr. Winthrop's acting in this agreement is nothing
to you, for he acted therein as your public and common
agent and plenipotentiary, and therefore his acting in that
capacity and relation are yours in him.
APPENDIX VI L 575
14. That after Mr Winthrop's return, when some from you
treated again with our committee about union, it was answered
by our committee that we could not admit any treaty with you
about this matter till we might treat as an entire colony, our
members being restored to us whom you have unrighteously
withheld from us, whereby also those parties have been many
ways injurious to this government, and disturbers of our peace ;
which is and will be a bar to any such treaty till it be removed,
for till then we cannot join with you in one government without
our fellowship in your sin.
15. That after this, nothing being done by you for our just sat-
isfaction, at the last meeting of the commissioners from the four
United Colonies of New England, at Boston on the day
of September, 1663, the commissioners from New Haven Colony
exhibited to the other commissioners their confederates, a com-
plaint of the great injuries done to this colony by Connecticut,
in the presence of your commissioners, who for answer there-
unto showed what treaties they had made with New Haven, but
that plea was inconsiderable through your persisting in un-
righteously withholding our members from us, whereby our
wounds remain unhealed, being kept open and continually
bleeding. The result of the commissioner's debates about
that complaint was in these words, "The commissioners of
Massachusetts and Plymouth having considered the complaints
exhibited by New Haven against Connecticut, for infringing
their power of jurisdiction, as in the complaint is more particu-
larly expressed, together with the answer returned thereto by
Connecticut commissioners, with some other debates and con-
ferences that have passed between them, do judge meet to
declare, that the said Colony of New Haven being owned in the
Articles of Confederation as distinct from Connecticut, and
having been so owned by the colonies in this present meeting,
in all their actings, may not by any act of violence have their
liberty of jurisdiction infringed by any other of the United
5/6 APPENDIX VI L
Colonies without breach of the Articles of Confederation, and
that where any act of power hath been exerted against their
authority that the same ought to be recalled, and their power
reserved to them entire, until such time as in an orderly way it
shall be otherwise disposed. And for particular grievances
mentioned in their complaint, that they be referred to the next
meeting at Hartford," etc.
We suppose that when they speak of disposing it otherwise
in an orderly way, they mean with our free consent, there being
no other orderly way by any act or power of the United Colo-
nies for disposing the colony of New Haven otherwise than as it
is a distinct colony, having entire jurisdiction within itself,
which our confederates are bound by their solemn confedera-
tion to pursue inviolate.
1 6. That before your general assembly in October last, 1663,
our committee sent a letter unto the said assembly, whereby
they did request that our members by you unjustly rent from us
should be by you restored unto us, according to our former
frequent desires, and according to Mr. Winthrop*s letter and
promise to authority in England, and according to justice and
according to the conclusion of the commissioners in their last
session at Boston, whereunto you returned a real negative
answer contrary to all the promises, by making one Brown your
constable at Stamford ; who hath been sundry ways injurious to
us and hath scandalously acted in the highest degree of con-
tempt, not only against the authority of this jurisdiction but
also of the king himself, pulling down with contumelies the
declaration which was sent thither, by the Court of magistrates
for this colony, in the king's name, and commanded to be set
up in a public place that it might be read and obeyed by all
his majesty's subjects inhabiting our town of Stamford.
1 7. That thereupon at a general court held at New Haven for
the jurisdiction, the 2 2d of October, 1663, the deputies for this
general court signified the mind of our freemen as not at all
APPENDIX VII. 577
satisfied with the proposal of the committee from Connecticut,
but thought there should be .no more treaty with them unless
they first restore us to our right state again. The matter was
largely debated, and this general court considering how they of
Connecticut do cast off our motion in the forementioned letter
and give us no answer, but that contrary thereunto, as is
reported, they have further encouraged those at Guilford and
Stamford, therefore this court did then order that no treaty be
made by this colony with Connecticut before such acts of
power exerted upon any of our towns be revoked and recalled,
according to honored Mr. Winthrop*s letter engaging the same,
the commissioners' advice, and our frequent desires.
1 8. That in this juncture of time we received two letters
from England, mentioned in the following declaration pub-
lished by the court of magistrates upon that occasion, in these
words ; Whereas this colony hath received one letter under his
majesty's royal hand and seal (manual in red wax) annexed,
bearing date the 21st of June, 1663, from his royal court at
Whitehall, directed To his trusty and well beloved subjects the
governors and assistants of the Massachusetts, Plymouth, New
Haven and Connecticut colonies in New England ; and one
other letter from the lords of his majesty's most honorable
privy council, from his majesty's court aforesaid, bearing date
the 24th of June in the year aforesaid, superscribed. For his
majesty's special service, and directed To our very loving
friend John Endicott, Esquire, governor of his majesty's planta-
tions in New England, and to the governor and council of the
colony of the Massachusetts, with the rest of the governors of
the English plantations in New England respectively, and by
order of the general court at Boston recorded in the court it is
particularly directed to the governor of the colony of New-
Haven ; in which letters his majesty hath commanded this
colony many matters of weight, very much respecting his majes-
ty's service and the good of this country in general, expecting
5/8 APPENDIX VII.
upon displeasure the strict obsen'ance thereof, which this Court
(this colony being situated by the sea-side, and so fitly accom-
modated to fulfil his majesty's commands) are resolved to
their utmost to obey and fulfil But in their consultation
thereabout, they find through the disloyal and seditious princi-
ples and practices of some men of inconsiderable interests,
some of his majesty's good subjects in this colony have been
seduced to rend themselves firom this colony, by which divis-
ion his majesty's affairs in these parts are like to suffer, the
peace of this country to be endangered, and the heathen
among us scandalized, in case some speedy course be not taken
for the prevention thereof, the which if we should connive at,
especially at this time his majesty having so particularly di-
rected his royal commands to this colony aforesaid, we might
justly incur his displeasure against us. This court therefore
doth in his majesty's name require all the members and inhabit-
ants of this colony heartily to close with the endeavors of the
governor and assistants thereof for fulfilling his majesty's com-
mands in the said letter expressed, and in order thereunto to
return to their due obedience and paying their arrears of rates
for defra)'ing the necessary charges of the colony, and other
dues, within six days after the publication hereof, unto such
person or persons as are or shall be appointed to collect the
same, in attendance to the laws and orders of this colony. All
which being done this court shall forever pass by all former
disobedience to this government ; but if any shall presume to
stand out against his majesty's pleasure so declared as afore-
said concerning this colony, at their peril be it. This Court
shall not fail to call the said persons to a strict account and
proceed against them as disloyal to his majesty and disturbers
of the peace of this colony, according to law.
19. This declaration being grounded in general upon his
majesty's commands expressed in these letters, and in special
in order to the preser\'ation of his majesty's customs in that
APPENDIX VI L 579
case provided for by act of this present parliament, which act was
sent inclosed with the letter to our governor, requiring his strict
observance of the same under the penalty of displacing and a
thousand pounds fine, and therefore in case any difference
should arise to his majesty upon these accounts, we must be
inforced to lay the cause of it at your door, because when it
was sent to the several towns of this colony, and set up in
public places to be seen and read of all, that all might obey it,
it was at Stamford violently plucked down by Brown your con-
stable, and with reproachful speeches rejected, though sent in
his majesty's name, and by the authority of our court of magis-
trates. And after it was published at Guilford, Bray Rosseter
and his son hastened to Connecticut to require your aid against
this government, which accordingly you too hastily performed,
for on the 30th of December, 1663, two of your magistrates
with sundry young men and your marshal came speedily to
Guilford accompanying Rosseter and his son, and countenan-
cing them and their party against the authority of this general
Court, though you know how obnoxious they were formerly to
this jurisdiction, for contempt of authority and seditious prac-
tices, and that they have been the ringleaders of this rent, and
that Bray Rosseter the father hath been long and still is a man
of a turbulent, restless, factious spirit, and whose design you
have cause to suspect to be to cause a war between these two
colonies, or to ruin New Haven colony ; yet him you accom-
panied in opposition to this colony, without sending or writing
before to our governor to be informed concerning the truth in
this matter. Sundry horses, as we are informed, accompanied
them to Guilford, whither they came at unseasonable hour,
about ten o'clock in the night these short days, when you might
rationally think that all the people were gone to bed, and by
shooting of sundry gims, some of yours or of their party in Guil-
ford alarmed the town, which when the governor took notice
of, and of the unsatisf}nng answer given to such as inquired the
58o APPE.VDJX VII.
reason of that disturbance, he suspected, and that not withoi
cause, that hostile attempts were intended by their compan;
whereupon he sent a letter to New Haven to infonn the magii
trates there concerning matters at Guilford, that many wei
affrighted, and he desired that the magistrates of New Have
would presently come to their succor and as many troopers z
could be got, alleging for a reason his apprehension of their dei
perate resolutions. The governor's messengers also excited t
haste, as apprehending danger and reporting to them that Brat
ford went up in arms hastening to their relief at Guilford, whic
the governor required with speed. Hereupon New Haven wa
also alarmed that night by beating the drum, etc., to warn th
town militia to be ready, etc. This fear was not causeless, fc
what else could be gathered from the preparations of pistol
bullets, swords, etc., which they brought with them, and by th
threatening speeches given out by some of them, as is alteste
by the depositions of some and subscriptions of others, which w
have by us to show when need require ; and your two magi;
trates themselves, who ought to have kept the king's peac
among their own party and in their own speeches, threatened ol
governor that if any thing was done against those men, i. e., Roi
seler and his party, Connecticut would lake it as done againi
themselves, for they were bound to protect them ; and they ro?
high in threatenings, yet they joined therewnth their desii
of another conference with New Haven, pretending their pui
[xjse of granting to us what we would desire, so far as the
could, if we would unite with them; but still they held oi
members frotn us and upheld them in their animosities again:
us. Is this the way to union? and what can you grant \
which we have not in our own right within ourselves withoi
you? Yea, it is the birthright of our posterity which we nia
not barter away from them by treaties with you. It is oi
purchased inheritance, which no wise man would part with upo
a treaty to receive in lieu thereof a lease of the same, upo
APPENDIX VI L 581
your terms who have no right thereunto. And why is our union
with you by our coming under your patent urged now as neces-
sary for peace ? seeing we have enjoyed peace mutually while
we have been distinct colonies for about twenty years past.
And why do you separate the things which God hath joined
together, viz. righteousness and peace, seeing you persist in
your unrighteous dealing with us, and persuade us to peace.
It is true we all came to New England with the same ends, and
that we all agree in some main things, but it doth not follow
from thence we ought therefore to unite with you in the same
jurisdiction, for the same may be said of all the united colonies,
which nevertheless are distinct colonies.
20. That upon a more diligent search of your patent, we find
that New Haven colony is not included within the line of your
patent, for we suppose that your bounds, according to the
expression of your patent may be in a just grammatical con-
struction so cleared, as that this colony, in every part of it may
be mathematically demonstrated to be exempted from it.
21. That the premises being duly weighed, it will be your
wisdom and way to desist wholly, and forever from endeavoring
to draw us into a union under your patent by any treaty for
the future, and to apply yourselves to your duty towards God,
the king, and us. ist, Towards God, that you fear him, and
therefore repent of your unrighteous dealing with us, and re-
foim what you have done amiss, by restoring our members
without delay unto us again, that you may escape the wrath
of God which is revealed from heaven against all unrighteous-
ness and against all that dishonor his holy name, especially
among the heathen, which you have done thereby. 2. Toward
the king, that you honor him by looking at us as a distinct col-
ony within ourselves, as you see by the premises his majesty
doth, and by restorin[g] us to our former entire state, and our
members to us in obedience to his majesty who hath com-
manded us, as a distinct colony^ to serve him in weighty aflairs,
582 APPENDIX VI l.
and wherein if you hinder us, (as you will if you still withhold
our members firom us, as much as in you lyeth,) you will incur
his majesty's just and high displeasure, who hath not given you
in your patent the least appearance of a just ground for your
laying any claim to us. 3. Towards us, your neighbors, your
brethren, your confederates, by virtue whereof it is your duty
to preserve unto us our colony state, power, and privileges,
against all others that would oppose us therein or encroach
upon us. Is Rosseter of such value with you that what this
jurisdiction doth against them your colony will take it as done
to themselves? But if it be said, as one of your committee is
reported to express it, that you must perform your promise to
them, as Joshua and elders of Israel did to the Gibeonites,
do you not see the sundry disparities between that vow and
yours? or do you indeed make conscience of your vow to
Gibeonites, if you term them so, and without regard to your
consciences break your promise and most solemn confedera-
tion to Israelites ? Doubtless it will not be safe for this colony
to join in one government with p)ersons of such principles and
practices ; no treaty will be able to bring us to it. We believe
that our righteous God, to whom we have solemnly and pub-
licly commended and committed our righteous cause, will pro-
tect us against all that shall any way wrong and oppress us ;
neither will we at all doubt the justice of his majesty, our king
as well as yours, and of his most honorable council, but that
upon hearing the business opened before them they will effectu-
ally relieve us against your unjust encroachments, as the matter
shall require. We desire peace and love between us, and that
we may for the future live in love and peace together as dis-
tinct neighbor colonies, as we did above twenty years together
before you received and misunderstood and so abused your
patent, and in hope that our uncomfortable and afflictive exer-
cises, by your encroachments upon our rights would issue
therein, we have so long borne what we have suffered for i>eace*
APPENDIX VI L 583
sake ; now it is high time that we bring these unbrotherly con-
tests, wherewith you have troubled us, to a peaceable issue. In
order thereunto, we do offer you this choice, eithei to return
our members unto us voluntarily, which will be your honor and
a confirmation of our mutual love, or to remove them to some
other plantation within your own bounds, and free us wholly
from them ; for we may not bear it that such foedifragous, disor-
derly persons shall continue within the towns belonging to this
colony, to disturb our peace, despise our government, and dis-
quiet our members, and disable us to obey the king's com-
mands. But if they stay where they now are, we shall take our
time to proceed according to justice ; especially with Brown, for
his contempt of the declaration, and therein of the king's com-
mands and of the authority of this jurisdiction, and with Bray
Rosseter and his son for all their seditious practices.
Lastly for prevention of any misapprehension, we crave leave
to explain our meaning in any passages in this writing, which
may seem to reflect censure of unrighteous dealing with us,
upon your colony or general assembly, that we mean only such
as have been active instruments therein.
From the committee, by order of the General Court of New
Haven Colony,
James Bishop, Secretary^
New Havsn, March 9, i6{}.
[/« these papers is a copy of the answer of the New Haven Case
Stated^ and New Haven Plea, March, 166}.
Honored Gentlemen and Neighbors, — We have, according
to our promise in our last to you (sent by your messengers) ,
considered what you sent to us, and, by way of answer, we re-
turn as foUoweth.
You are pleased to term our claims and our claiming our in-
terest, an unjust pretence and encroachment upon your just and
584 APPENDIX VIL
proper rights. To untie this knot and pretence of yours, in all
the particulars of it, states the whole case you have presented
in your large schedule and multiloquous pennings ; therefore as
methodically as we can, and curt, as the little time we have
allowed and our other weighty concernments will permit, in few
words we have addressed ourselves for resolution and your con-
viction.
It is not a pretence, but a reality that we do and have acted
upon ; we are a delegated power and act under a superior head,
yours and ours, if we both know our standing, upon whose in-
terest we do and must act ; and our acting so shows our loyalty
to our sovereign and is no way dissonant to a religious rule, and
therefore our consciences not to be charged with deHnquency
therein ; (we forbear to gird, though we have your copy for it
before us) ; and if with a single, not self-willed eye, you be
pleased to peruse and weigh what we have already promised,
the next particular in order is resolved ; we will set to it a seal,
a broad seal, which we doubt not will confirm the justice of all
our actings towards yourselves, if our great forbearance prove
not prejudicial to us, we being trustees in charge ; and then if
what we claim be just and really just, what you assume to your-
selves belongs to us ; what you have aspersed us withal, apply
it to yourselves; if you can disprove what we have rightly
affirmed, then you must countermand our allegation with as
eminent a delegation and sealed with as broad a se!iil also, yet
then it would not be so eminently evident, but doubtful and
admit a trial, because the plea of priority would be ours and
not yours, and you well know that is a good plea in the law.
As for your consultations with friends in England, intentions
and ends propounded to yourselves, we see no more argument
of force in such precedaneous discourses than in a dream of rich
revenues to an awaking poor man ; of the ^same nature it is to
be one joining in the purchase of the Massachusetts patent and
a patentee, because the privileges thereof extend not beyond
APPENDIX VII, 585
the limits of the same, for our purchasing of one piece of land
gives us no right to our neighbor's field ; and it is a difficult
undertaking to maintain your Indian purchase from the right
owner thereof, or to plead a better right than Connecticut who
had the right of conquest, and as added to conquest a deed of
gift from the great sachem Sowheag, and under both those
rights possessing ; and by the court of Connecticut allowing you
a plantation right in that place, and then calling whom their
agent that possessed the same, we may well question the founda-
tion of your government, unless you can find and show a Con-
necticut court record allowing the same.
And as for Stamford's being joined to New Haven govern-
ment by consent of Connecticut, there is no record extant that
we can find ; but provided it be true as you say, they are but
words of course, as the case now stands, because the conclu-
sion follows not upon the premises, but rather all your many
instances are but so many flourishes as blinding mists, to darken
the truth as now it is.
Your high prizing of Mr. Eaton, that worthy man deceased,
who we own was wise, grave and godly, and we could also say
that we have had governors not much inferior, who now with
him lie in the dust, but such applauses little promote our state
concernments in this present contest ; wherefore we shall pass
them over as not so pertinent.
But you say from the first you maintained your Quilipiage
against the claim of the Dutch, by hewing out the King's Arms
in wood, and advancing them (marble and brass are the more
lasting)"; but we of Connecticut maintain our rights and claim
now, by the king's arms in wax, which is a confirming seal to
his royal pleasure in express words and directions for our settle-
ment for ever hereafter.
You say all New England consented that New Haven should
be and were a distinct government, except Rhode Island. It is
likely that is a mistake, for Piscataway was then a government,
586 APPENDIX VIL
and Agamenticus, and several other planted places more east-
ward, whose consent and approbation was never sought for as
we suppose, but if it were as is said, there is no danger to peki
to it or argument in it to advantage.
The main argument as follows is the combination and solemn
confederation, unto which we answer.
1. The combination did not constitute a government with
power and privileges, only amicable compliance and mutual
helpfulness in common concernments, as bordering firiends and
neighbors in a distracted wilderness.
2. The casual inducement of the combination was a former
exigence felt (as in the Pequot War) and for future feared, as
vis unita fortior, to deter a common enemy Sxom. future attempts
in Hke kind, and to promote mutual welfare.
3. As a vow is disannulled by the contradiction of a suj>erior,
so where the word of a king is there is power ; and we having
the word of a king, with a religious loyalty we are to observe it
when we may do so, without sin in doing so.
4. It is our duty (when without sin we may so do it) to obey
our king in his lawful commands, when every year we take our
solemn oaths exactly to attend all his and our lawful appoint-
ments.
These particular arguments also answer the common title of
the four united colonies, for by the combination came in that
union.
And for a title of a Colony, it is not a tide of honour properly,
neither doth it imply government ; the basis of oiu* government
is not that empty title, but as subjects of his royal majesty by
his abundant grace we are created and made a body poHtic and
corporate with power and privileges, and the extent of our
corporation ordered to be all that part of his majesty's domin-
ions in New England, bounded as our charter expresseth, and
entrusting us with the care of all the plantations therein and the
government of all the people thereof; and because it is a duty
APPENDIX VIL 587
incumbent on us to be faithful to our trust, we do declare and
claim (not with a flourish of empty words) as under our gov-
ernment, all those plantations which you possess and have
formerly governed as peculiarly belonging to our corporation,
requiring your subjection to our order and laws in observance
to the order and appointment of our royal sovereign and yours.
Then you improve as another argument that Mr. Gregson
intended to procure a patent, and was employed therein by
yourselves, with the consent of Connecticut, for the procuring
of p)ower and privileges, for both are implied by your mention
of a patent, though there be no enforcing argument for what
you intend it in these presents, yet we must take notice of what
may appear as contradiction and our advantage, for this en-
deavor succeeded the combination, and therefore it was then
the conclusion both of yourselves and us (as you say) that
our combination was not sufficient, patent right was requisite,
yet perusing the preface to the combination, we question the
truth of it, it being neither upon record and that preface in
plain and full words expressing that by reason of sad distrac-
tions in England by which we were hindered both from seeking
and reaping the comfortable fruits of protection, &c., which is
the great privilege conferred by letters patents, and if then
patent right was requisite, now we have obtained it and you are
included within it, wherefore ready submission would better be-
come you than bold insultings and charges. We pass particu-
lars briefly, knowing that a word to the wise is sufficient.
You say Connecticut sought a patent without your consent,
when you had formerly taken in their consent to Mr. Gregson*s
intention as before : we say as before we have said, we can find
no record witnessing the same ; but to take off your causeless
offence herein, we doubt not but you well know that we paid
hundreds of pounds to Mr. Fenwick and his agents for patent
rights several years together, and we will now inform you we
had a full promise and engagement for the sending and deliver-
5 88 APPENDIX VI L
ing into our possession that patent which we had paid so dear
for, the date of the grant of which patent did precede the com-
bination, or your knowledge of a place called Quilipiage in New
England, and this patent which now we have is but that which
fonnerly we should have had, with some small addition and in-
considerable alteration, and neither that addition or alteration
reflecting upon yourselves in any measure. Our owning of you
in a tacit way we doubt not but will be judged a favour in the
true sense, rf such as have eyes to see and hearts to under-
stand.
As for your letter from the Lords of the Council, persons
whom we highly honour as yourselves do, yet we suppose it was
sent in the time of the great distractions in England, when the
king was separate from his parliament, but now we have re-
ceived letters patent confirmed by broad seal and writ of privy
seal, king, council, and parliament all consenting, and not only
owning of, but establishing us with corporation power and
privileges, upon which we may act more boldly than on a pre-
sumption only, and are bound to act so, and that under oath
and by royal appointment.
Your affirming Connecticut had no patent but within these
two years last past we have fully answered it before ; a patent
formally confirmed and possessed we had not till of late,
though we had payed a considerable sum, and had the same
firmly engaged. Had we had it before, we should have acted
upon it as now we do, and probably more vigorously.
Greenwich settled by the commissioners was in the time of
ignorance which doth not alienate a true proper right forever.
As for that friend's warning letters to our honored governor,
&c., we know not what they were, but it is attested that your
then governor desired our honored governor to include New
Haven within our charter, and by a letter and improving his
interest in some friends he further endeavored the same.
You affirm, if New Haven were within the patent they should
APPENDIX VII. 589
have been warned to the first general assembly, for we could
not constitute a general assembly without them ; this is hardly
worth an answer, but to prevent a cavil, the power and privilege
was not conferred on New Haven but on Connecticut, and this
evidently appears, because the favour extended is unto those
that formerly had purchased, conquered, and now petitioned ;
and we should have acted imprudently, disorderly and justly
offensive to our associates so to have done, before we had dis-
covered his majesty's favour towards them in his gracious grant,
and preferring others less obliged.
The next particular presented is the rent and disturbance
thereby to your government and orderly constitution (as you
say) by our admission of some of your members under our pro-
tection. Those of your members (as you term them) clearly
perceiving themselves included, and advisedly considering their
duty for willing and ready observance of his majesty's pleasure
and appointment, and for obedience unto our corporation power
as ready subjects to both, owning us as we are truly delegated,
we could not without some danger but accept of them, con-
firming security and protection, and do conclude the like ready
obedience from yourselves would have been more regular and
comfortable to yourselves at last ; the event will discover.
Now to give you a short answer to our honored governor's
letter to Major Mason, which as yet never came to our honored
Major or our hands ; if it be with you, you had done well if you
had sent it us.
2. As for his engagement, it was after we had received your
members (as you term them), it evidently appears, the com-
plaint being upon that account.
3. We had then received our letters patent, and acted ac-
cording to our instructions and directions in them from his
majesty ; our true loyalty to his gracious appointments and our
proceedings therein his majesty hath determined and warranted
pleadable in law against himself and his successors, and so we
stand free.
S90 APPENDIX VII.
But in respect of the honor of our worshipful governor, as
we are able we shall answer.
1. Our governor knew the extent of the patent, the desire of
your then governor, as by letter and persuasion of friends ap-
pears, and therefore in the order of the patent acted innocently
and blamelessly, espressing his great courtesy and tender re-
spect towards you, and this bluster of yours is a very ungrateful
return for all his love, favour and tenderness.
2. Yourselves could not but be well acquainted with what we
expressed, before you sent into England unto our honored gov-
ernor by way of complaint, for you had received a copy of the
patent by our first committee sent firom Connecticut unto you.
3. You know that the absolute power was now in the hands
of the corporation of Connecticut to do according to the tenor
thereof, and not in our governors power to alter the same.
4. Our honored governor receiving your complaint (and
from a tender affection and favour towards yoiuselves) endeav-
ored to do his utmost to promote your desires ; and what a
reward he hath for his labour of love from you, the world may
judge.
5. Lastly, this cannot advantage your cause nor be an evi-
dence in your plea, for he passeth no engaging promise to you
therein, but as a friend persuading those whom it altogether
concerns to do what possibly and fairly may be done, with the
highest engaging expressions adventuring as far as may be to
do you a kindness, which you should have accepted if you had
known yourselves.
For the commissioners* last act in relation to those our con-
cernments, their caution introduced in relation to the Dutch,
is a wary answer, saving our allegiance to his majesty and
interest by patent, which you may accept of as our present
answer to your allegation, for there is a stronger argument in
it than yours alleged.
And for your mathematical measures and discovery, it might
APPENDIX VI L 59 1
do us some service in the line betwixt us and the Massachu-
setts, if you have an able artist, when he is desired by them
and us to attend that service ; but our charter is the true astro-
lobe for our south bounds.
Gentlemen, these shadows being flush and fled, in the next
place we shall make some short return to your sharp reproofs,
and answer your arguments briefly.
Our return to the narrative gives you a full answer to all your
arguments, yet to silence cavils full of empty adored conceits,
to each argument we shall take the pains to give a short answer,
only premising to prevent tautology.
1. Yourselves have proclaimed our king, owned him your
sovereign and yourselves his subjects, and the places you possess
part of his majesty's dominions abroad, and in your present
writing declaring that you intend (if not already attempted)
to improve means for obtaining a patent.
2. You well know a king in his own dominions is by all men
termed pater patria, and in Scripture record he is said to be a
nursing father, and then all his subjects or his children bound
to obey. (Eccles. viii. 2 ; i Pet. ii. 13, 14.)
I. Argument : That Connecticut in entertaining some inhabit-
ants of Stamford, Guilford, and Southhold, they did it by a
pretended power against the just right of New Haven Colony
and without their knowledge or consent.
This assumption is false, both in the pretended power men-
tioned, and the just right as you apply it. For, i. Our power is
real, not pretended ; it is formally legal, as by our letters patent
doth undeniably appear, being ratified by broad seal. 2. For
your just right, that appears to be your pretence and presump-
tion only, and it cannot be maintained unless you can show a
deed of gift sealed as ours and precedent also. And 3dly,
Whereas you say what we did was without your knowledge and
consent, we answer: i. Your consent was not absolutely requi-
site, the places possessed by them being within our charter
592 APPEXDIX VII.
limits and the government of the people committed to our care,
and they claiming it as their privilege, and ourselves clearly
perceiving it to be so, could not deny them without unfaithful-
ness in our trust.
Hence your prolix discourses (by way of explication of this
argument) respecting the 5th and 8th commandment, reflect
upon yourselves as the transgressors, withstanding your ready
obedience to the order and appointment of your nursing father,
and attempting to intrude, and actually disturbing of us in our
just rights. As for your purchase of the Indians, it is very
questionable whether you purchased of the right owners ; but if
you did, as yourselves say, yet you purchased but land of them
and not jurisdiction power, about which is our only contest.
2. Argument : Connecticut have assumed to themselves
power of jurisdiction over part of our members without just
right thereunto.
This assumption is altogether false, for, i. We assumed not
this power to ourselves ; our letters patent are our witness,
which declare that his royal majesty, of his abundant grace,
certain knowledge and mere motion, hath created and made us
a body politic and corporate, to exercise our government over
all, yourselves not excepted, which is sufficient to discover our
just right beyond exception, and to cavil against it is only to
bid battle to a shadow.
As for your mathematical demonstration, we judge it not
worthy to be weighed in the balance of reason, it is so unrea-
sonable. I. If we exceed our line and limits it is a trespass
against the king : when his attorney general appears, then we
will plead our patent, for his royal majesty of his abundant
grace hath made it pleadable against himself and for the best
behoof of the governor and company. 2. If you had a patent
and there were to be a line settled for peace between us, we
should readily attend you therein, but we cannot understand
that his majesty hath yet given you distinct from us a mathe-
matical line.
APPENDIX VIL 593
3. Argument : Connecticut have acted contrary to promise
and confederation.
Ans. — In nonage the contradiction of a superior makes
void : a father disannuls the child's act, that is powerless ; for
the dispose or gift of government is only the Tgift of the
nursing father within his own territories and dominions; if
otherwise, it was blamable folly to be at such large expense to
procure a patent, when the commissioners might have granted
it for an inconsiderable sum, and it will be the like folly in your-
selves, especially being minded and forewarned of it ; the true
question here is whether his majesty's appointment or the
commissioners* is of most force and valid.
. 4. Argument : Connecticut have done contrary to the general
rule of love and righteousness.
Ans. — I. In every argument we find the question begged.
2. Hence the assumption is false. But 3dly, to apologize for
our love and righteousness : i. For love : by your then chief in
government our governor was solicited to include New Haven
within our patent, both by speech and letter, and friends in
England were improved by some of you to persuade to and
promote the same, and according to your desires attended the
best expedient to express sincerity of love, your case and
condition at that time duly considered ; and since by our many
loving insinuations, solicitings, and loving treaties, both for
your own good and ours, and large offers of immunities and
liberties as great as our own, and as far as we could possibly
extend our charter ; what could we have done more. 2. For
righteousness : the extremity of justice we have not used, but
the moderation of justice ; we might have immediately declared
you under our government, required your subjection, upon
refusal severely censured, and have justified what we had done ;
yet we have used much patience, forbearance, waiting, and
expense of much time and charges, if possibly we might have
gained you without much extremity, and we doubt not but
594 APPENDIX VII.
understanding judges will interpret it an extreme condescend-
ency and chargeable labor of love ; besides for righteousness,
you were included in our former patent grant, which was before
your being or your plantation, and at chargeable purchase to
ourselves, and this our patent expresses it a valuable considera-
tion of our present confirmation. And now having so fully
expressed ourselves and informed yourselves, we can appeal to
all the Christian world for judges.
5. Argument : If the general assembly upon the receipt of
your patent agreed to treat with New Haven about union, and
in the interim accept of some of your members without your
consent, they dealt unrighteously, but so Connecticut did.
Ans. — This argument looks like a chaos, there is so much
jumble in it ; it is hypothetical with a sequel in the first propo-
sition, which is to be denied as a non sequitur^ for both may
be without any unrighteousness, for it is the king that hath
united you and us ; to have refused the ready submission of
any, had become unrighteousness towards the persons tender-
ing that obedience, and a negligent retarding of the king's
appointment ; the vote for a treaty for union only respected the
modus, for a more placid entertainment of what in duty and
loyalty was to be attended. If authority entertains one that
voluntarily offers himself, persuades another, commands a third,
he sins in neither, nor though he had determined to treat with
them together before that ; and truly the greatest danger of
dismembering, and loosing an ear, is in refiising submission to
m
his majesty's lawful appointment.
Argument 6th : Connecticut pleads a power over New Ha-
ven by virtue of a patent, and it gives them no such power,
whereby they abuse that patent and deal unrighteously.
Ans. — This answered before, and it is too favorable to say
it is like two sentences in one sense, rather six sentences and
no sense ; like men spoken of in the prophet, that have eyes
and see not, hearts and understand not.
APPENDIX VIL 595
To the remaining arguments we say, and sufficient is said to
maintain it : i. That our entertainment of those members was
righteous, our promise of protection lawful ; therefore that we
may avoid unrighteousness, and it perform we must. 2. Their
submission was righteous and commendable : we dare not call
good evil. 3. Then if Joshua took himself boimd to keep
promise with the Gibeonites who acted wilily, and were of that
people which were appointed to destruction, much more must
we, when people of our own language, nation, profession, and
friends, are appointed and ordered under our care and protec-
tion, keep our promise with them, allowing them an interest
in all our privileges which are common to them as well as
ourselves.]
i !
INDEX.
A.
Abbot, George, Archbishop of Canterburyi
19, ao, a6, 35, 4». «6o.
Abbot, Sir Maurice, 35.
Ahaddon, alias Joshua, 333.
Akerly, Robert, 173.
AUerton, Itmzc, 135, «h, 435, 543, 546.
Allerton, Isaac, Mrs., 435, 544, 548, 55a.
Allerton, Isaac, jun., 370.
Ailing, John, 547, 550.
Alling's. John, wife, 55a.
Ailing, Roger, 109, 133, 990, a9i, 543, 545,
550. 556.
Ailing, Sister, 544, 548, 553.
Allyn, John, 477. 478, 485, 486, 491, 500,
5<M. 503. 506, 507. 5«3. 5«4. 5«5i 5«8, 521,
5". 5*3. 5*4.
Allyn, Matthew, 465, 467, 477, 478.
Alsop, Joseph, 419, 546, 55a
Alaop, Goodwife, 548, 553,
Andrews, Nathan, 14a.
Andrews, Samuel, 381.
Andrews, William, 100, loa, iii, 147, ai8,
»97. 446, 54a. 545. 550-
Andrews, Goodwife, 549, 554.
Anuuitaway, 91, 318.
Arhclla, Eaton owned one-sixteenth of, 51.
Armor, defensive, 398.
Arms, persons subject to military duty must
furnish themselves with, a94, a97. In-
spection of, 295, 396, a97, 303.
Arrival at Quinnipiac of its first planters.
Artillery Q>mpany, 396, 304.
Ashfind in Kent, 4a, 43.
Astwood, John, 156, 157, 389.
Athletic games, 306.
Atkinson, Luke, no, 148, 543.
Atkinson, Goodwife, 549.
Atwater, David, 43, 47, in, 144, ai3, 390,
543. 546, 550.
Atwater's, David, wife, 544, 547, 55a.
Atwater, Joshua, 43, 47, 63, in, 141, ao8,
aii,aao, 265, 54a.
Atwater, Sister, 544.
Atwater, Thomas, 47.
Augur, Nicholas, ia8, 190, ao4, 390, 311,
3M, 367. 369. 546, 550.
Austin, Francis, 167.
Average time of voyages from London to
Boston in the seventeenth century, 54.
Axtell, Nathanael, 109, 136.
Aylmer, John, 53, 54.
B.
Bacon, Francis, 10.
Bacon, Leonard, 60, 101, 9o6, ao8, aia, 939,
428, 435.
Bailey, Samuel, 109, 135.
Baker, Thomas, 159.
Baldwin, John, 155.
Baldwin, Joseph, 155.
Baldwin, Nathanael, 155.
Baldwin, Richard, 155.
Baldwin, llmothy, 137, 155.
Baldwin, Widow, no, 137, 155, 939.
Ball, Allen, 14a, 150, 546, 5J0.
Ball, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Bannister, Edward, 97, no, 148, $49.
Bannister, Goody, 544.
597
ixi, X4fiy. aif, jrz,
'< 544, 5I9» £3-
>S3-
54a.
544.
r$4«, 55»-
's»S4r»53i-
BeL AVirtam. zzc. i^o* 543,
BrHini'tanu WoQaiB, §4, 443; S3S>
BoKckz, TV»as, Z73.
Bcaaaa. > An. 109, 125, 439, jfa, 545, 546,
551- _
Bc=2iam, 5«aEr, 544, 54^
Beslsaat's, Jofcn, wife, 549, 533.
Eeaiaai, J:»eph, 547, 551.
EmVam't, Joseph, wife, 553.
Beajaitm, RkJard, 173.
BenscB, Edward, 166.
Besthap, Mr., j23.
B«tts, Thomas, 166, 167.
Bishop, James. xi8, 291, 47a, 496, 500, 513,
570, 5M, 525, 545, 550, 556, 560, 565, 585.
Bishop, Goodwife, 548, 55a.
Bishop, John (of Guilibrd)p 161 , 164, 167,
168, 500.
Bixhop, John, Rev. (of Stamford), 34a.
Bishop, Stephen, 167.
Blacklcy, Samuel, 167, 551.
Blaydcn, William, 547.
Blinman, Richard, 275, 346.
Booth, John, 173.
Ik)rcman, William, 167.
Botsford, Henry, 311.
Bowen, John, 966, 067, 546.
385; «
3*5.
to
yecng o^
4«.4a3.
'» F«a«3», tix, X45, «3.
V Mia^ FnKis, ajs, »S3. 544-
.547.55a.
.553-
\ KMimo, 100.
>*^ 77. 97. 109. «33. axS. 3",
3*4.447.543. 546. 550-
Bnckett, Staa, 544, 548, 55a.
Biook, Lofd, 445-
Bioola, Janes, S5X-
BiovB, CoBStafaK, 579*
Biovii, Fiandft, 63, 15a, 1S3. 543. 54^, 551.?
Biovii, Staa, 545. 54*, 55*.
Brown, John, 551.
Brown's, John, wife, 553.
Brown, Peier, xxo, 149, 54a.
Brawn's, Peier, wife, 545.
Brawn, Ridiard, 173.
Browning, Hemy, iix, 143, 54s.
Bryan, Akzander, 304.
Bnckingfaam, THoinas, 109, 136, 155, X56.
Bndd, John, 109, 133, 173, aa6.
Bull, Lieut., 5x0.
Busbeage, 330.
Bushndl, Francis, x6x, 167.
c
Caffinch, John, xxx, 144, 264, 167, 168, 54a,
546.
Caffinch, Mrs., 544, 547.
Camp, Edward, 339, 546.
Camp, Goodwife, 548, 549.
Camp, Nicholas, 1st, 159, 433.
INDEX.
599
Canary Islands, commerce with, axo.
C^field, Matthew, 156, 54a.
Canficld, Goody, 544.
Card-playing, 381.
Carman, Mr., aio.
Carpentery at New Haren, ai8.
Carr, Robert, 509.
Carroughood, 84, 88, 328.
Cartwright, George, 509.
Caryl, Mr., 207.
Case, Henry, 173.
Cellars as temporary habitations, 71.
Chais, Dr., 368.
Chalker, Alexander, 166.
Chambers, Richard, 24.
Chapin, John, 424.
Chapman, John, 102, 109, 125.
Charles, John, no, 149.
Charles the First, 6, 15, 17, ao, 2Z, 22, 127,
445-
Charles the Second, 386, 418, 421, 442, 571.
Chatfield, Francis, 161.
Chatfield, George, 167.
Chatfield, Thomas, 167.
Chatterton, William, 551.
Chauncey, Charle;, 23a.
Cheever, Ezekiel, 41, 100, xoa, 109, xao, 121,
122, 146, 26a, 263, 532.
Cheever, Sister, 544.
Chidsey, John, 546, 550.
Chidscy, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Chittenden, William, 161, 164, 166,168 304.
Church, the, is not established by the State:
but itself institutes civil authority, 227.
Church gathered in New Haven, loi.
Churches, were Congregational, 228, 237.
Church-members, only, shall be free bur*
gesses, 99, 157, 170.
Church, oflficers of a, 238.
Clapboards for the Canary Islands, aio.
Clark, Capt., 225.
Clark, Daniel, 485, 486, 491.
Clark, Goodwife, 548.
Clark, James, no, 151, 152, 546, 551.
Clark's, James, wife, 545.
Clark, John, 97, 102, no, 148, 297, 543, 551.
Clarke, Sister, 544, 545, 554.
Cloth, manufacture of, 364.
Coats quilted %»rith cotton-wool for defensive
armor, 298.
Cockerill, John, 141, 142.
Codman, Goodman, 271.
Coe, Robert, 173, 175, 179.
Cogswell, Robert, no, 151.
College at New Haven projected from the
beginning, 271; Mr. Hopkins's bequests
in aid of, 275.
Colonial government. Constitution of, 185.
Confederation of the four cokmies, 169, 176,
179, 181.
Conklyne, John, 173.
Connecticut lays claim to the territory of
New Haven, 447 ; sends Winthrop to pro-
cure a charter, 448: receives the charter,
462; begins to treat with New Haven for
a comfortable and happy union, 466.
Constable, George, 546.
Constable, Mrs., no.
Constable, Sir William, 141.
Contributions for the maintenance of the
elders, 242.
Conway, Sir Richard, 28, 29, 30.
Cook, Thomas, 161, 166.
Cooking-utensils, 357.
Cooper, John, nx, 147, 198, 284, 3XX, 446,
54a, 545. 550-
Cooper. Sister, 544, 549, 554.
Cooper, Thomas, 173.
Corey, John, 173.
Corwin, Matthias, 173.
Cotton, John, 34, 411, 539.
Crampton, Dennis, 425.
Crane, Jasper, zo8, Z09, 128, ao8, 220, 285,
3", 377» 4ax, 427. 43a. 433, 466, 468, 490»
506. 5»3. 54a.
Crane, Sister, 544.
Crittenden, Isaac, 500.
Cromwell, Oliver, 200, 202, 3x0, 377.
Cruttenden, Abraham, z6i, x66.
Cruttenden, Abraham, jun., X67.
Cullick, John, 278, 555.
Curtis, Caleb, 173.
D.
Dana, Rev. James, 63.
Danforth, Thomas, 494.
Daniel, Stephen, 546.
Daniel, Mrs., 548, 552.
Darley, Sir Richard, X38.
6oo
INDEX.
Davenport, A. B., 356.
DaTcnport, John, a8, 99, 30, 3a, 33, 34, 35,
36, 39. 40, 4», 43. 44, 45. 46. 47. 5*, 53. 54,
58, 59, 60, 63, 67. 68, 69, 70, 7a, 73, 76. 8f ,
83, 84, 85, 90, 91, 93, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100,
109, 1x3, 123. 127, ia8, 139, «35. »40, t4>.
148, 160, 163, 163, 171, 173, 196, 308, «I4,
»33, 338, 339, 340, a4i, »70. »7«. »72, a73,
375, 376, 377," 380, 281, 383, 383, 384. 385,
387, 888, 389, 390, 391, 394, 317, 318, 344,
35a. 354, 355, 356. 365. 367, 368, 369, 370,
37», 37a, 374. 415, 417, 419, 423, 424, 4*5,
4^9, 430, 433, 434. 440, 44*, 449. 468, 469,
473, 474, 481, 483, 485, 494, 5^4, 507, 526,
5*8, 535, 539, 540, 541, 555, 55^, 557. 560.
DaTcnport, Mrs., 31, 354, 369, 544, 553.
Davenport, John, jun., 391, 546, 549, 556.
Davenport, Rev. John, of Stamford, 314.
Davids, James, 146.
Davis, John, 435.
Davis, WiUiam, 136, x S3, »96, a66, 54a, 545.
Davis, Sbter, 544, 547, 55*-
Day, Horace, 531.
Day of extraordinary htmiiliation, 74.
Dayton, Ralph, 153, 543.
Dearmer, Mr., xix, X45.
De Forest, John W., 318, 33r, 336.
Delaware Bay, purchase of land at, 193: at-
tempts to settle a plantation at, X93, X95,
196.
Detmison, James, 551.
Denton, Richard, 175.
Desborough, Samuel, 166, 169.
Dexter, Franklin B., X38.
Dickerman, Abraham, 55X.
Dickcrman, Goodwife, 553.
Dickcrson, Philemon, X73.
I>>ct. 357. 353, 359-
Dillingham. John, an.
Dimon, Thomas, 173.
Divbion of land at New Haven, 103.
Dixon, Jeremiah, 100, loi, ill, 145.
Dixwcll, John, 146.
Doolittic, Abraham, 546, 550.
DooUtile, Goodwife, 548, 553.
l>owd, Henry, 161, 167.
Dudley, William, 161, 166.
Dunk, Thomas, 167.
Dunstcr, Henry, 231, 273, 536.
Dutch, the, trade with, 191 ; sdze a vessd
in Ncv-HavcB bafbor, X9»; ask aid in 1
war with the liwHaiw, 306; a qiuuicl \
309-
Eatoo or Heatoo, James, 381, 38a, 547, <
Eaton, Mrs. Richard, X09, xao, 250, 544.
Eaton, Nathanael, 127, 535.
Eaton (Rev.), Samud, 37, 38, 39, 54, 90,
99, «oa, «»9, "7, "8, xao, 1x7, 143, 30
Eaton, Sanrael, 197.
Eaton, Theophilos, 39, 40, 46, 47, 51, 6x,
63. 65, 67, 73, 76, 8t, 82, 84, 8s, 98, 1
xox, X02, 104, X09, XX4, 1x5, 1x9, xao, 1
xa7, X3X, 13s, 136, 138, X4«, «43, X54. ^
x8o, X83, X93, 195, X97. 308, 9\t, ax3, s
378, 394, 303, 3x7, 3x8, 336, 327, 334, -.
348, 354, 355, 356, 360, 370, 377. 3Sa, :
386, 398, 4XX, 4x4, 4x5, 416, 4M, 433, .
555, 567, 568, 569, 570, 57^, 585-
Eaton, Mrs. Tbeophilus, 1x5, xzy, 933, %
aso, 356. 383.
Eaton, Theophilus, jnn., 38a.
Edwards, Timothy, xso.
Egerton in Kent, 4a, 43.
Elooct, Anthony, 3xx, S5X.
Eldrcd, Mr., X40, X4s.
Eldred, Mrs., xix, X45, 379, 39X.
Election days, 379.
Elective franchise limited tochurcb-flaembi
99-
Eliot, John, 34 s.
Elizabeth, Queen, 3, 4, 5, 7, as, 344,
Elizabeth the washer, xs3.
Ellis, Henry, 200.
Elsey, Nicholas, 109, X34, 542, 545, 550.
Elsey, Sister, 545, 549, 552.
Elton, John, X73.
Elmigration to New England occasioned
trouUes in England, x ; restrained by ro
proclamation, 51.
Endicott and his company emigrate, aa.
Endicott, John, 293, 428, 498, 597.
England, contest between arbitrary and c
sdtutional government in, 3: condition
when the founders of New Haven resol'
to emigrate, 23.
English people, contest between the, and
Stuarts, 6.
INDEX,
6oi
English Puritans, how they received- James
the First, 7.
Evance, John, 40, 76, 110, 199, 140, 193, 199,
at I, asi, 54a.
Evance, Mrs., 544.
Evarts, John, 166.
Eyers, Simon, 435.
Eyers, Mrs. Simon, 434, 43s.
F.
Fairbanks, Richard, 191.
Family worship, 360.
Feaks, Robert, 330, 413.
Fences, cost of, at Quinnipiac, 77.
Fenn, Benjamin, 109, 131, i55>334»490,443,
466, 468, 490, 49a, 493, 506, 513.
Fenner and Turner, 4a.
Fcnwick, George, x6a, 333, 334, 341, 34a,
446, 448, 449. 587-
Femes, William, 47, 49.
Field, Mr., 550.
Field, Sister, 554.
Fiennes, Charles, 445.
Finch, Abraham, 3a8, 339.
Fitch, James, 337, 338, 346.
Fitch, Joseph, 467.
Fletcher, John, 159.
Foot, Robert, 551. .
Foot, Goodwife, 553.
Footway across fields in Milford, 159.
Ford, Timothy, no, 149, 150, 543, 546, 550.
Ford, Goody, 545, 549, 553.
Fowler, John, 155, x66, 167.
Fowler, William, 76, 109, 137, 155, 156, 157,
158, 543. 546.
Fowler, Sister, 544, 548.
Foxon, 333, 337.
French, Thomas, 167.
Fugill, John, X4a, 363.
Fugill, Thomas, 100, loi, zoa, no, xii, laa,
138. 139. »4o. 142, i47«
Fuller, Thomas, 35, 54.
Fundamental law, 386, 408, 409, 410.
G.
Gardiner, Lion, 69.
Garret, Mr., 41a.
Gibbard, William, 3aa, 430, 54a, 545. 549-
Gibbard, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.
Gibbons, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Gibbons, Henry, 543, 547, 550.
Gibboiis, William, 159, 153, ax8, 543, 546,
550.
Gibbs, John, 54a, 545, 550.
Gibbs, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.
Gilbert, John, 550.
Gilbert, Jonathan, 503.
Gilbert, Matthew, xoo, xox, xoa, X09, xa6,
xa7, xa8, X79, 339, 348, 384, 385, 991, 491,
425. 426, 427. 433. 434. 437. 44©, 44«, 468,
473. 490. 494. 506. 513. 549. 556.
Gilbert, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.*
Gildersleeve, Richard, 175.
Glover, Charles, 173.
Gtover, Henry, 390, 543, 546, 550.
Glover, Goodwife, 549, 553.
GofTe, Stephen, 35.
GofTe, William, xa6, 137, 365, 4x8, 4ax, 4aa,
423, 424, 428, 430, 43«. 432, 433, 435. 43^.
440, 443. 444.
Goldsmith, Ralph, 173.
Goodenhouse, Samuel, X46, 193, 545, 550.
Goodenhouse, Mrs., 547.
Goodwin, William, 378, 555, 556.
Goodyear, Stephen, 41, 109, 135, X36, X9a,
X98, 905, ao6, ao8, 309, aii, axa, ai4, aa4,
250, 264, a73, 344, 377, 403, 415, 416, 537.
Goodyear, Mrs., 55a.
Goodyear's, Mr., daughters, 548.
Gookin, Daniel, aoi, aoa, 337, 338, 491.
Government at New Haven instituted, xox.
Government at Milford instituted, 156.
Government provisional at Guilford, x68;
institution of, at Guilford, X69.
Greene, widow, 110, 138.
Greenwich, 41a, 4x3, 414, 465.
Gregory, Henry, aao, aai, aaa.
Gregory, John, 549.
Gregory, Sister, 544.
Gregson, Richard, 546.
Gregaon, Thomas, 41, 76, X05, X09, xxa, X35,
X79, x8o, ao8, 909, 914, 334, 537, 539, 569,
587.
Gregson, Mrs., 544, 559.
Grover, Simon, 173.
Guilford, covenant of its planters not to
forsake one aiK>ther, x6i ; proprietors of,
in X659, list of, z66; church instituted,
602
IXDEX.
169; limits soffrage to churdMnanbers,
170; enlarges its territory, 453; disaflected
persons at, received by Conoecticut, 465.
Gunn, Ja:^)er, 069.
Gulridge, Richard, 161, 166.
H.
Haines, James, 173.
Halbidge, Arthur, 97, no, 149, 54s.
Halbridge, Goodwife, 549.
Hall, Francis, no, 151.
Hall, Job, 140.
Hall, John, 153, 546, 55a.
Hall, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Hall, William, 161, 166.
Hallock, Peter, 173.
Halstead, Mr., 481.
Hames, Goodman, 153.
Hampden, John, 23, 445.
Hampton G>urt Gmferenoe, 8.
Handicrafts, variety of at New Haven, ai6.
Hanford, John, 265, 366, 367.
Harding, Will, 358.
Harriman, John, 543, 545, 550.
Harriman, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Harris<Hi, Thomas, 550.
Harrison, Goodwife, 552.
Hawkins, William, 109, 136.
Hayncs, John, 179.
Health of New Haven cok>ny as compared
with Old England, 365.
Hector, the, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53, 53,
54, 55.
Henry the Seventh, 3, 6.
Henry the Eighth, 33.
Herbert, John, 173.
Hereford, emigration from, to New Ha-
ven, 43.
Heresy, law against, 331.
Hickock, Mr., 108, 109, 133.
Higginson, Francis, 23, 46, 54, 56, 143.
Higginson, Mrs. Francis, in, 143, 544.
Higginson, John, 165, 166, 167, 169, 241,
269, 363.
Higginson, Theophilus, 143, 542.
High Commission, 25.
Highland, George, 167.
Hill, Robert, 97, ni, 145, 543, 546, 550.
HiU, Sister, 545, 549.
Hitchcock, Edward, 546.
Hitchcock, Goodwife, 548.
Hitchcock, Matthias, no, 151, 543, 546, 551.
Hitchcock's, Matthias, wife, 544, 55a.
Hoadley, John, 161, z66, 169.
Hodskins, Samod, 547, 551.
Hodsldns, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Hodson, John, 149, 290, 546, 550, 560.
HodsoQ, Mrs., 548, 553.
Hogg, Thomas, 63.
Hollister, Gideon H., 504.
Holt, \lillliam, 546, 550.
Holt, Sister, 553.
Hood, Timothy, 31, 33.
Hooke. William, 196, 307, 239, 340, »73, 375,
377. 440, 441-
Hooke, Mrs. WHliam, 423, 433, ^44.
Hooker, Samuel, 465, 467.
Hooker, Thomas, 179, 355, 539.
Hopkins, Edward, 40, 53, 1x4, 118, 1x9, zao,
«7i. 275. »76, 277. 279. *8o, 381, 383, 389,
290» 334, 4". 555. 55^. 559-
Hopkins, Mrs., 1x4, xxs, 555.
Horton, Barnabas, 163.
House, interior of Gov. Eaton's, zx6.
Houses, four in New Haven which ^xcWkd
in stateliness, 135: a general descripdon
of the in New Haven cokmy, 353, 353.
Household furniture, 354, 355.
Householders at New Haven who in 1641
were not (rce-planters, 153.
Howe, Ephraim, 190, 550.
Howe's, Ephraim, wife, 55a.
Howe, Jeremy, 545, 550.
Howe's, Jeremy, wife, 548.
Howe, Sister, 552.
Hubbard, George, 166, X67.
Hubbard, William, 172, 321, 366, 370, 373,
387. 414, 538, 540.
Hughes, John, 161, 162.
Hughes, Richard, 167.
Hull, Andrew, no, X5X, 153.
Hull, Jeremiah, 553.
Hull, Goody, 545, 548.
Hull, John, 527.
Hull, Richard, 102, 109, 134, 547, S5t.
Humiliation, days of extraordinary, 377.
Humiston, Henry, 551.
Humiston, Goodwife, 553.
Humiston, Sister, 553.
INDEX.
603
Humphrey, John, 445.
Hutchinson, Ann, 59.
Hutchinson, Richard, 48.
Hutchinson, Samuel, 48.
Hutchinson, Thomas, aoo, 355, 435.
I.
Indian conspiracy, 334, 344, 388.
Indians, Mohegan, 331, 333 ; Quinnipiac,
73. 74f 3*7. 318, 328,399; Wepowaug.
318, 319.
Indians, treated with justice and kindness,
331, 32a, 323, 324, 325; endeavors to
Christianize, 345, 346, 347.
Iron-ore brought from North Haven, 224.
Iron- works, 224.
Ives, William, no, 112, 150, 543.
Ives, Sister, 544.
J.
Jackson, John, 551.
Jackson, Sister, 553.
James the First, 6, 7, 9, 10, 29, 41, 244, 445.
James, Thomas, no, 137, 138, 263, 302, 542.
James, Mrs., 545.
James, Thomas, jun., 543.
Jeanes, William, 109, 134, 263, 264, 266, 268.
Jeffrey, Thomas, 102, 109, 130, 131, 196, 198,
220, 284, 297, 314, 324, 543, 546.
Jeffrey, Sister, 544, 548.
Jenningson, William, 293.
John, King, 3.
Johnson, Old Goodwife, 549, 552.
Johnson, John, 97, no, 167, 546, 550.
Johnson's, John, wife, 552.
Johnson, Richard, 547, 551.
Johnson, Robert, 353, 543, 547.
Johnson, Goody, 544, 548.
Johnson, lliomas, 546, 550.
Johnson's, Thomas, wife, 548, 552.
Jones, John, 322, 546.
Jones. Sister, 553.
Jones, Thomas, 161, 166.
Jones, WUliam, 291, 422, 425, 428, 4*9. 430.
466, 468, 478, 485, 486, 490, 502, 506, 510,
5". 5»3. 5M. 5»5. 549. SS^.
Jones, Mrs. William, 422, 423, 552.
Jordan, John, x6i, 167.
Jordan, Thomas, 166, 390, 396, 397, 399.
Judson, William, 143, 545. 55o-
Judson, Goodwife, 549, 552.
Juries, no, in New Haven, 386.
K.
KeUond, Thomas, 424, 427, 438, 430, 434,
443-
Kent, Surrey, and Sussex, a company fnnn,
settle at Guilford, x6o.
Kieft, Governor, 570.
Kimberley, Abraham, 547.
Kimberley, Eleazar, 126.
Kimberley, Thomas, 109, 123, 135, za6, 153,
a67, 997, 435, 543, 546, 550.
Kimberley, Sister, 544, 548, 553.
Kimberley, John, jun., 551.
Kimberley, Zuriel, 134.
King, Samuel, 173.
Kingsley, Professor, 380.
Kingsworth, Henry, z6i, x66.
Kirk, Thomas, 424, 427, 428, 430, 434, 443.
Kitchel, Robert, 161, 164, x66, x68, 386.
Knightly, Richard, 445.
Knowles, Thomas, 543.
Knowles, Goody, 545.
L.
Lambert, Edward R., 63, 73, 159, 369.
Lamberton, George, 76, 83, 84, X05, X09, 139,
«3». «33, 13s. «94, »09. 537. 54©.
Lamberton, Mrs., 254, 544.
Lamberton, Hannah, 553.
Lamberton's ship, 3o8, 537.
Lamson, Jonathan, 1x2.
Lamson, Thomas, 543, 546, 550.
Land at New Haven, purchased from the
Indians, 84: first division of, X03, aecoad
division of, 107.
Larrymore, George, 153, 319.
Lathrop, John, 37, 38.
Laud, Archbishop, 19, ao, 36, 30, 32, 39, 33,
34, 36, 4«. 42, 43. 160. m6.
Law, Richard, 470, 473, 5»3. 5M»
Lawrencson, John, 193.
Laws of the colony, 4x1, 4x3.
Leather to be sealed, 333.
Leaver, Thomas, 253.
6o4
INDEX,
Lediford, Hioinas, 35a.
Leeke, Phflip, mo, 322, 543, 546, 551.
Leeke, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Leete, William, 150, 161, 164, x66, 168, 169,
a34, 237, 338, 276, 285, 3x3, 389, 390, 396,
397, 399. 403, 409» 4«5» 4^6, 421, 424, 425,
426, 427, 433, 434, 435, 439, 440, 441, 443,
468, 476, 479, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 487,
490, 492. 49i. 500. 50a, 503, 506, 507, 510,
5". 5«3. 574-
Leigh, Lord, 52.
Leighton, Aleacander, 24.
Letter, of Davenport and Eaton to the gov-
ernor and councO of Massachusetts, 65;
of Davenport to Lady Vere, 162; of
Davenport to John Winthrop, jun., 4x5:
ditto, 4x7: of the Councfl of Massachu-
setts to Gov. Leete, 436: of the General
GMirt of New Haveo to the Council of
Massachusetts, 438: of John Norton to
Richard Baxter, 443; of Coimecticut to
New Haven, 447; of Lord Say and Seal
to John Winthrop, jun., 450; of George
Fenwick to WiUiaxn Leete, 452: of Wil-
liam Leete to John Winthrop, Jan., 457;
ditto, 458; of Connecticut Committee to
their much honored and reverend friends
at New Haven, Milford, &c., 467 ; of New
Haven Committee in reply to the fore-
going, 467 ; of the freemen of New Haven
to the General Assembly of Connecticut,
470; of John Winthrop, jun., to Major
Mason, Deputy-Governor of Connecticut
Colony, and the rest of the Court there at
Hartford, 475; of Davenport to John
Wmthrop, jun,, 481; of William Leete to
John Winthrop, jun., 484; of New Haven
Committee to Connecticut Committee, 486;
of Connecticut Committee in reply to the
foregoing, 488: of New Haven Committee
to the General Assembly of Connecticut,
495; of Connecticut Committee to Gov.
Leete, 502; of Gov. Leete to Connecticut
Committee, 503; of New Haven Commit-
tee to Connecticut Committee, 505; of
Connecticut Committee in reply to the
foregoing, 506; of New Haven Committee
to Connecticut Committee, 507; of Con-
necticut Committee in reply to the fore-
going, 507; of New Haven Committee to
the Councfl of Connecticut, 519: of die
Councfl of Connecticut in rep^ co the fore>
going, 522: of New Haven Ccmunittee to
the Councfl of Connecticut, 523 : of Na-
thanid Rowe to John Winthrop, 535; of
James Pierpont to Cotton Mather, 540:
of remonstrance from New Haven to the
General Assembly of GMinecticut Cokwy,
56X ; entitled " New Haven's Case Stated,"
from the New Haven Conxmitxee to the
General Assembly of Conoecticut Colony,
566.
Leveret, Capt, 438.
Liberty, rdigious, die planters of New
Haven not advocates of, 226.
Liodon, Henry, 542, 545.
Lindon, Goody, 545, 547, ssa.
Lines, Henry, 559.
Lines', Henry, wife, 553.
Lines, Ralph, 547, 550.
Lines', Ralph, wife, 552.
Ling, Benjamin, xix, X46, 147, 482, 54a, 56a.
Ling, Sister, 544.
Linsley, John, 167.
Livermore, John, xxo, 149, 543.
Livermore, Sister, 544.
Lord, Robert, 322.
Lord's day, the, began at sunset, 361.
Low, Andrew, 97, xxo, 145, 543, 546, 551.
Low, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Lucas, Mr., iii, 145.
Ludlow, Roger, 344, 404, 405.
Lumber, price of, at QuinnifHac, 79.
M.
Malaria at New Haven, 366.
Malbon, Mary. 122.
Malbon, Richard, 4X, xoo, 109, 122, 123, ia4,
129, 130, 135, X79, 208, 29s, 369, 542.
Malbon, Mrs., 544.
Mallory, Peter, 546, 551.
Mallory, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Manchester, Earl of, 571.
Mansfield, Joseph, 550.
Mansfield, Richard, 109, X29, X30, X44, 145,
213. 543.
Mansfield, Sister, 544, 549, 553.
Mapes, Thomas, 173.
Alarket-place at New Haven, 105.
INDEX.
605
Mairiages, how solemniied, 363.
Marshall, Mr., 11 x, xag, 130, 145, X47.
Marsh, Jonathan, 319.
Marsh, Samuel, 547, 551.
Marsh, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Martin, Capt., ao3.
Martin, Robert, 543.
Martin, Sister, 544.
Mary, Queen of Scots, 5.
Mason, John, 133, 995, 313, 333, 338, 339,
475. 476, 480, 48*. 482, 496. 566, 573» 589.
Massachusetts, desirous to retain Davenport
and his company, 58 ; reasons why Daven-
port and his company were not content to
settle in, 6x; requires Mr. Eaton to pay
taxes, 65; refuses to join in a war against
the Dutch, 389.
Massachusetts Bay Company, transfier the
govenunent of their plantations to New
England, 33; Davenport a director of, 36;
Eaton a patentee of, 39.
Mather, Cotton, 99, xox, xx6, Z3i, 141, 155,
aoo, 540.
Mather, Richard, 333.
Maverick, Samuel, 509.
Mayer or Mayres, Mr., no, 140.
Medal, commemorating the settlement of
New Haven, 74.
Meeker, William, 550.
Meeker, Goodwife, 553.
Meeting-house at Guilford, 346; at Milibrd,
346; at New Haven, 347; seating the, at
New Haven, 350.
Meigs, John, 134, sao, 23x, 333, 436, 501, 543.
Meigs, Goody, 544.
Mepham, John, 161, 167, 169.
Merriman, Nathanael, X53, 153, 447, 546, 550.
Merriman, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Metcalf, Stephen, 153, 376.
Mew, Ellis, 551.
Mewhebato, 338.
Miantinomoh, 333, 334, 335, 336, 344-
Miles, Richard, 109, X36, X4X, 155, 157, aoa,
303, 3o8, 348, 419, 543.
Miles, Mrs., 544, 547» 3Sa.
Miles, Richard, jun., 546.
Milibrd, land bought for a scttlleroent at, 9X ;
church at, organized, 155; first general
court at, 156: town seal of, 157; limits suf>
(rage to church-memben, X57; name given
to, X59; original name of, 159; first divis-
ion of land at, x6o: obstacle which delayed
the reception of, into the colony of New
Haven, 183.
Military duty, exemption from, 303.
Military officer, chief at Quiimipiac, 994;
only a church-member could be a, 3x1.
Mill, the first in N^w Haven colony, 158.
Miller, Thomas, 47.
Mills, Thomas, 167.
Mitchel, Matthew, 175.
Mitchel, Thomas, 153, 547.
Mitchel, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Mix, lliomas, 390, 546, 550.
Mix, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Mohawks, 3x6, 317, 331.
Momaugin, 84, 88, 89, 3x8, 339.
Montauk Indians, 313, 330.
Montowese, 89, 3x8, 337, 339, 447.
Moore, Thomas, X73.
Morality in New Haven colony, 355.
Morrell, Henry, 547, 551.
Morris, Thomas, 153, X53, 319, 546, 551.
Morris, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Moss, John, xxo, 148, 149, 397, 543, 546, 55a
Moss, Goody, 545, 548, 553.
Moss, Joseph, 148.
Mould, Isaac, 3x1.
Moulthrop, Matthew, xxo, X5X, 545, 550.
Moulthrop, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Mullener, Mr., 545, 550.
MuUener, Mrs., 548, 553.
Mullener, Thomas, 546.
Mimson, Thomas, 130, 153, 196, 3x8, 984,
997. 298. 3««, 543, 545, 550.
Munson, Sister, 545, 549, 553.
N.
Nash, John, X53, ao3, 384, 397, 3XX, 474, 543,
545, 550.
Nash's, John, wife, 544, 547.
Nash, Joseph, 543. 546.
Nash's, Joseph, wife, 545.
Na&h, Thomas, X09, X34, X35, 196, x6i, x69,
167, 315, 543.
Nash, Sister, 544, 548, 559.
Naylor, James, 336.
Neighborhood meetings, xoo, 355, 378.
Neighborly heli^ulneu, 374.
6o6
INDEX,
Ndghboriy interooune, 379.
Nepaupuck, xoa, 327, 338, 339, 330.
New Engtand, occasion of the Puritan emi-
gration to, I ; connection between the his-
tory of, and the history of the mother
country, a.
New Haven, iu planters leave Boston for
Quinnipiac, 68 ; its planters who were not
proprietors supplied with house-lots, 103;
the name of, when given to that plantation,
X13; iu planters endeavored to make it a
commercial town, 189; receives a proposal
to remove to Ireland, aoo; receives a pro-
posal to remove to Jamaica, aoi ; town on
Sunday morning, 376.
Newman, Francis, 41, iix, 118,144, 197, an,
a85, 397, 32a, 397, 398, 403, 4xa, 415, 416,
4i7f 424, 54a. 545-
Newman's, Francis, wife, 544, 547.
Newman, Richard, 153, 551.
Newman, Goodwife, 553.
Newman, Robert, 41, 76, 95,99, 100, loi, loa,
104, HI, 147. >6a, 163, 164, 165, ao7, 339,
441.
Newman's bam, 95, 99, 147, 163, 164.
Newman's Elder, wife, 544.
Newton, Roger, 341, 468.
NicoUs, Adam, 153, 543.
NicoUs, Sister, 545.
Nioolls, Richard, 509, 517.
Ninigret, 310, 313, 315, 331, 338, 400, 403,
404, 406, 408.
Norton, Humphrey, 334, 335.
Norton, John, 233, 443.
Norton, Thomas, i6x, 167.
o.
Obechiquod, 337.
Osbill, John, 551.
Osborne, Goodman, 178.
Osborne, Jeremiah, 546, 550.
Osborne, Richard, no, 151, 153, 543
Osborne, Goody, 545, 548.
Osborne, lliomas, no, 137, 153, 54a
Osborne, Sister, 544, 55a.
Ourance, 322, 323.
Overton, 341.
Oyster Point, 75.
Oyster-shell Field, 106.
P.
Paine, Peter, 173.
Paine, William, 546, 551.
Paine, Goodwife, 548, 55a.
Palfrey, John G., 376, 345, 349, 350, 509.
Pardee, George, 389, 546, 550.
Pardee, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Parker, Edward, 546, 550.
Parker, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Parmelee, Sister, 553.
Parmelin, John, 161, 166.
Parmelin, John, jun., z66.
Parrot, Francis, 137.
Patrick, Daniel, 330, 4x3.
Patteaon, Edward, ixo, 151, xsa, 543, 546,
55».
•Patteaon, Sister, 545, 548. *
Paul, Daniel, xxo, X49, 3x9, 543.
Paulding, Benjamin, 153.
Payne, Mr., 335.
Pfeakin, John, 545.
Pearce, Mark, xxi, X46, 3x4, a68, 998, 543.
Peck, Goodman, 153.
Peck, Jeremiah, 369, 370, 385, 286, 287, 378.
Peck, Widow, 548.
Peck, William, 4X, xxo, X49, 291, 359, 54a,
546, 556.
Peck, Sister, 545, 548, 55a.
Pelham, Herbert, 445.
Pell, Thomas, 146, 367, 543.
Peimington, Ephraim, 547.
Pennington, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Perkins, Edward, 547, 553.
Perry, Richard, 109, lao, xaa, 377, 543.
Perry, Mrs., 544.
Peters, Hugh, 69.
Philip of Spain, 5.
Pierce, Capt., 417, 419.
Pierpont, James, 319, 540, 54X.
Pierson, Abraham, 342, 375, 385, 287, 311,
325. 346, 347. 38s. 468, 484. 5»5.
Pigg, Robert. 63, 153, X53, 547.
Pigg, Goodwife, 548.
Pikes to be provided at the town's charge,
298,305.
Plane, William, 161, X67.
Plastowe, Josias, 375.
Piatt, Richard, iio, 137, 155, axo.
Pocock, John, 145, 155.
INDEX.
607
Poous, 319, 390, 331.
Population of New Haven in 1641, 153.
Portrait of Davenport, 123.
Portrait which belonged to the £laton family,
115.
Post-office, germ of, 191.
Potter, Goody, 548, 552.
Potter, John, 97, xxo, 150, 551.
Potter's, John, wife, 55a.
Potter, Joseph, 551.
Potter's, Joseph, wife, 553.
Potter, Sister, the midwife, 544.
Potter, Widow, 110, xsa
Potter, William, no, 144, 2x3, 543, 545, 550.
Potter's, William, wife, 544.
Powell, Thomas,! II, 142, 474, 543, 546, 551.
Powell, Sister, 545, 548, 553.
i^Prwton, EUlward, 546, 550.
I Preston's, Edward, wife, 553.
I Preston, Robert, 543.
\ Preston, William, 109, 129, 134, 15X, 152,543.
\Preston, Sister, 178, 544, 548.
FrTces at New Haven, 77, 79, 21 x, 9x7.
Prince, Thomas, 494.
Pringle, William, 55X.
Privy Council, notes of its proceedings in
January, 1637, 42.
Proprietors of Guilford in 1652, 166.
Proprietors of Milford in 1646, map opposite
p. 155.
Proprietors of New Haven in 1641, a list of,
109.
Prudden, James, 109, 137, 155.
Prudden, Peter, 44, 53, 68, 73.90f 93. 99. »o9.
>37. 155. «56, 241.
Prynne, William, 24.
Punderson, Ebeneser, 140.
Punderson, John, too, xox, 1x0, 140, 543,
546, 550.
Punderson, Sister, 544, 548, 55a.
Purchase of lands from the Indiaiu, 84, 89,
91, 164, 172, 174, 3x9, 390, 321.
Puritan emigration commences in the time
of the third parliament of Charles the First,
22.
Puritans and Separatists at New Haven, 93.
Puritans, English, reasons why they emi-
grated to New England, x.
Purrier, William, 173.
Pym, John, 445.
Quakers, 234.
Quarters in the town-plot at New Haven, 76.
Qtnrters, outland, at New Haven, bounda-
ries of, 104.
Quesaquash, 84, 88.
Quinnipiac, the Pcquot war made the English
acquainted with, 61 ; seven men spend the
winter at, 63 ; arrival at, of its first plant-
ers, 69; name of, changed to New Haven,
1x2.
Quizmipiac Indians, 73, 74, 3x7, 318.
R.
Rates, Theophilus Eaton pays, in Massa-
chusetts, 65.
Rawson, Edward, 434, 436, 449.
Raynor, Thurston, 175.
Reeder, John, 1x0, 151.
Reekes, Stephen, 905.
Reeve, James, 173.
Regicides, the, Whalley aiul Gofle, arrive at
Boston, 418; at New Haven, 423: are
concealed in the mill, 428: at Judges' cave,
431, 434; at Milford, 435: at Hadley, 444.
Relf, Thomas, 167.
Restraint which the Puritans put upon their
feelings, 370.
Rich, Lord, 445.
Rich, Sir Nathanael, 445.
Richards, James, 501, 502, 503, 506, 5x4.
Richardson, Edward, 421.
Robinson, John, 125.
Robinson, Thomas, 211.
Rogers, Ezekiel, 81, 82, 83, 84, X31, 137, 141,
364.
Ross, George, 551.
Rossiter, Bray, 500, 501, 503, 504, 579, 580,
582.
Rossiter, John, 500.
Rowe, Matthew, 546, 550.
Rowe, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Rowe, Nathanael, 127, 535, 536.
Rowe, Owen, 109, 127, X28, 377.
Rowlandson, Mr., 266.
Ruggles, Thomas, 241.
Russell, James, iix, 129, 219, 543, 546, 550.
Russell, Sister, 545, 549, 553.
6o8
INDEX.
Russell, John, 444.
Russell, Sir WQluun, 49.
Russell, William, 15a, 153, 219, ago, 546, 550.
Russell's, Willbm, wife, 548, 552.
Rutherford, Henry, ito, 150, 4x9, 54a, 546,
550-
Rutherford, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.
s.
Sabbath worship, at Quinnipiac under an
oak-tree, 7a; in the meeting-houses, 35a,
375-
Sacket, John, 547, 551.
Saltonstall, Sir Richard, 445.
Sanford, Thomas, 433.
Sassacus, 338, 33a.
Saul, Thomas, ai8.
Savage, James, ia7.
Sawing lumber, 79, 317.
Sawsennck, 89.
Say and Seal, Lord, 445, 449, 571.
Schedule for taxation at New Haven, 109.
School, colony grammar, 375; Mr. Peck,
master of, 285; Mr. Peck's propositions
concerning, a86.
School, town, at (ruilford, Mr. Htgginaon,
master of, 269; Mr. Peck, master of, 369.
School, town, at Milford, Mr. Gunn, master
of, 270.
School, town, at New Haven, Mr. Cheever,
m.tster of, 262; Mr. Jeanes, master of,
264; Mr. Hanford, master of, 265: Mr.
Bowers, master of, 266; Mr. Pardee, mas-
ter of, 289.
SchooU early established, 261.
Scott. John, 481, 484, 485.
Scranton, Dennis, 425.
Scranton, John, 166.
Scarl, Mr., 528.
Sebequanash, 332.
Secretary Fugill put out of office, 139.
Scdgu-jv.k. Robert, 201, 202.
Scclcy, Robert, 102, 109, 126, 130, 132, 196,
211, 2;5, 311, 313, 314, 542, 547.
S<reley, Sister, 544, 548.
Scllcv.int, I)avid, 322.
Separatists and Puritans at New Haven, 93.
S^vcn men, chosen for the foundation-work
of a church and a government, xox.
Seward, Edward, 167.
Shaumpishuh, 85, 88, 164, 3x8.
Sheader, John, X67.
Sbeafe, Jacob, 169.
Shearman, Samud, 5x3, 5x4, 5x5, 5x8, 5tx«
535.
Shepard, Thomas, X38, 355, 349.
Sherman, John, a4X.
Sherman, Old Father, 150.
Sherman, Widow, xxo, xxa, 150.
Ship<arpenters, at New Haven, 8x9.
Ship-money, 33.
Shoe-making, unworkmanlike, aao.
Sickness at New Haren in 1658 and 1659,
366.
Signature of Davenport, 67: of Eaton, 67;
of Momaugin, and other Quixmiptacs, 88;
of Montowese, 89; of Sawvennck, 89.
Skidmore, Richard, 173.
Smart, Pfcter, 25.
Smith, George, ixo, xxa, xso, 543, 546, 550.
Smith, Sister, 545, 548, 55a.
Smith, Judge, 380.
Smith, Ralph D., x6a, 376, 350.
Smith, Thomas, 3x4.
Smyth, Robert, X73.
Social compact at Quinnipiac, 74.
5)ocial life, influenced by religion, 37a; amd
by residence in a new country, 373.
Social inequality, manifestations of, 374.
Soldiers sent to defend Uncas, 307; sent
against the Dutch, 310: rations for, 3x3,
314; sent against Ninigret, 314.
Somers, William, X67.
Southold, selded, X71 ; church of, gathered,
171; purchased in the name of New HaTcn,
172: under one jurisdiction with New
Haven, 17a: some of its planters, X73: se«
dition at, 406; revolts from New Haven
to Connecticut, 463.
Sowheag, 325, 326, 327, 585.
Sperry, Richard, 430, 431, 434, 55X.
Sperry, Good wife, 554.
Spinage, Humphrey, 55X.
Spinage, Goodwife, 381, 55a.
Spinning. 364.
Stamford, purchased, 174; settled, X75; ad-
mitted to membership in the colony, X75;
named, 175 ; in favor of war, 309, 404. 405;
sedition at, 405, 406; some of its inhab-
INDEX.
609
itants received under the protectkm of G>n-
necticut, 465.
Standish, Miles, 393.
Stanton, Thomas, 84, 89, 347.
Star Chamber, 23, 34.
Stephenson, William, 421.
Stevens, Thomas, 167, 31X.
Stiles, Ezra, 81, lax, 136, 135, 34X, 348, 434,
447.
Stillwell, Jasper, x66.
Stolyon, Mrs., axo, axx.
Stone, John, x6x, x66.
Stone, Samuel, 337, 465, 467, 483, 57a.
Stone, William, x6i, X67.
Stonehill, Henry, X36, X55.
Stoughton, Israel, 6x, 343.
Stoughton, William, 37.
Street, Nathanael, 550.
Street, Nicholas, 339, 375, 385, 387, a9x,4X9,
440, 441, 468, 474, 504, 556.
Street, Mrs., 553.
Street, Samuel, 389, 390.
Stuyvesant, Petei, 195, 305.
Sugcogisin. 84, 88.
Sumptuary laws, none in New Haven, 383.
Sunday evening, spent in social intercourse,
550.
Swain, William, 339, 385.
Swazey, John, X73.
Swmerton, Mrs., X53.
T.
Table furniture, 356.
Talcott, John, 477, 493*
Talmadge, Robert, 334, 545.
Tahnadgc, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Taphanse, 331.
Tapp, Edmund, xio, X37, X55, X56, X57.
Tappan, Capt., 408.
Tapping, James, 433.
Target-shooting, 397.
Taynter, Michael, 333.
Temple, .'^ir lliomas, 430, 433, 443.
Tench, Edward, 76, X04, X05, xxi, X40, X45.
Terry, Richard, 173.
Thanksgiving, the annual, 360; postponed,
416.
Thomas, John, 543, 546, 55 x.
Thomas's, John, wife, 545, 548, 553.
Thompson, Anthony, xxo, xso, 151, 54a.
Thompson, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.
Thompson, John, 149, 153, 545, 550.
Thompson, John, jun., 546.
Thompson, Major Robert, 48X, 484, 485, 555.
Thompson, William, 542, 545, 550.
Thorpe, Nathanael, 333, 333, 334.
Thorp, William, xix, 145, 543, 547, 551.
Thorp, Goodwife, 548, 553.
Tibbals, Thomas, 155, xo8.
Tichener, Martin, 546, 55X.
Tichener, Goodwife, 549, 553.
Todd, John, 143.
Todd, Christopher, X43, X53, 543, 545, 550.
Todd, Sister, 544, 548, 553.
Toquatoes, 331.
Town plot at New Haven laid out, 75.
Trade of New Haven-with Boston, X90; with
Manhattan, X9X ; with Delaware Bay, 903;
with Virginia, 304; with Barbadoes, 905;
with England, 907.
Trainings, military, 396, 378.
Treat, Robert, 385, 43X, 433, 466, 468, 490,
506, 513.
Troopers, a company of, 304.
Trowbridge, Thomas, xxo, X50, 990, 550.
Trowbridge's, Thomas, wife, S53.
Trowbridge, William, 550.
Trowbridge's, William, wife, 553.
Trumbull, Benjamin, 59, 64, 68, 73, 90, 165,
«7i. «73. »74. «75. «94, i9St «", 3«6, 3x8,
336, 346, 388, 404, 535.
Tucker, Francis, 37.
Tucker, John, X73.
Turkish pirate, 3x0.
Turner and Fenner, 43.
Turner, Isaac, 551.
Turner, Nathanael, xoo, xo3, X09, xax, xaa,*
134, X38, X44, X46, X74, 909, axo, 313, »93.
394, 395, 396, 998, 319, 537.
Turner, Mrs., 544.
Tuthill, John, 173, 176.
Tuttle, John, 546, 551.
Tuttle's, John, wife, 553.
Tuttle, Elizabeth, X30.
Tuttle, Jonathan, 550.
Tuttle's, Thomas, wife, 553.
Tuttle, William, 109, XX9, 324, 474, 543, 546,
550.
Tuttle, Sister, 544, 547, 55a.
6io
INDEX.
U.
Uncas, 307, 331, 339, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337,
338. 339. 343. 344.
Uoderhill, John, 62, 178, 993, 308, 330, 330.
V.
Vail, Jeremiah, 173.
Vane, Harry, 5a.
Vere, Lady Maiy, 39. 31, 1x3, 179.
Vincent, John, 153, 543, 547.
w.
Wakefield, John, 151, 543, 546.
Wakefield, Sister, 545, 548.
Wakeman, J6hn, 179, 908, 9ao, 999, 930, 490,
545.
Wakeman, Sister, 544, 547.
Walker, John, 153.
Wampum, 9x2, 959.
Ward, Andrew, 174, 175, 176, 179.
Ward, George, xix, X99, 9x9.
Ward, Goodman, 3x4.
Ward, Lawrence, xxx, 199, 9x9, 433.
Ware, John, 55X.
Warwick, Earl of, 445, 44^, 448, 449. 57*-
Wascussue, 3x9
Wash, 322.
Watch-house, 30X.
Watch, night, 399.
Watch to be kept on days of worship, 302.
Waters, Joseph, 514.
Watson, EUlward, 547.
Watson, Goodwife, 549.
Wattoone, 328, 329.
Wawcqua, 335, 336, 337.
Weaving, 364.
Welch, Thomas, X36, X55, X56.
Wells, William, 173.
Wepowaug, land at, bought by Prudden and
his company, 91.
Wepowaug Induns, 318, 319.
Weciua:,h, 332, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343,
3M, 345.
Wcsaucunck, 84, 88.
Wcstcrhousc, William. X49, 192, X93, 367.
Westminster confession of faith, 243.
Whalley, Edward, 142, 365, 431 , 439, 423, 434,
4*8, 430. 43*. 43a, 433, 435. 436, 440, 443,
Wheeler, Thomas, 543, 546, 547, 551.
\l'heeler. Goody, 545, 548.
Wheeler, Moses, xxx, X29.
Whitaker, Ephraim, x 73, 173.
White, Henry, xis, X34.
Whitehead, Isaac, 546.
Whitehead, Samuel, xxo, X48, 397, 3x1, 543,
545. 550-
Whitehead, Sister, 545, 548, 553.
Whitfield, Henry, 43, 125, X44, x6o, x6x, 163,
X64, X65, 166, X67, x68, X69, 340, a4X, 269,
a75. 3x8, 423. 481.
Whitfield's bouse, 349, 350, 351, 353.
Whiting, Mr., 5x0.
Whitman, Zachariah, X37, X55, 156, X57, 241,
377.
Whitmore, John, X75, 331.
Whitnell, Jeremiah, X09, X36, 543, 547, 551.
Whitnell, Sister, 544, 549.
Whitway, Thomas, 333.
^K^gglesworth, Edward, xxx, X43, 376, 377,
54a.
Wigglesworth, Sister, 544.
Wigglesworth, Michael, 7a, X43, 263, 531.
Wilford, John, 543.
Wilkes, William, X3X.
Willard, Major, 314, 404.
Williams, Roger, 64, 343.
Williams, Widow, xii, 145.
Willis, Mr., 535, 536.
\^!Tlloughby, Francis, 555.
Wdmot, Benjamin, 153, 54a, 546, 551.
Wilmot, Goodwife, 544, 548, 55a.
Wilmot, Goodwife, jun., 548.
Wilmot, Wifliara, 551.
Wines, Barnabas, X73.
Winslow, Edward, 46.
Winslow, Josiah, 494.
Winston, John, 290, 546, 550.
Winston, Goodwife, 549.
Winthrop, John, 52, 54, 56, 60, 6x, 63, 63, 78,
83. 9^ "4. "7, 131. 190,208,210, 219, 231,
32». 330. 34^ 358, 3S2, 3S3, 535, 537, 540,
567.
Winihrop, John, jun., 53, 224, 23;, 354, 3O3,
369. 415. 417. 419. 4". 423. 424, 448, 44^
464, 467, 469, 47t, 473. 475. 47^, 477, 481,
INDEX.
6u
48a, 483, 484, 485, 493. 494, 496, 497» 505.
So6» 517. 536, 5*7. 563. 566, 57«» 573» 574,
575. 576, 577-
Winthrop, Mrs. John, jun., 354.
Winthrop, Waitstill, 500, 50a, 503.
Wolcott, Henry, 506.
Wooden, Will, 551.
Wooden, Goodwife, 553.
Woodgreen, Mr., 437.
Worship, public, on the Lord's day, 252.
Wyllys, Samuel, 463, 465, 467, 477, 478,
485, 486, 491, 495, 500, 502, 503, 506, 5x0,
5>3.
Y.
Yale, David, 40, 109, xao, 138.
Yale, Elihu, 130, 138.
Yale, Thomas, 40, ixo, 138, 2x3, 446, 543,
546, 549-
Yale, Mrs., 544, 548, 55a-
Yorkshire company of emigrants at Quiimi-
piac, 81.
Young, Aime, 40.
Youngs, John, X7X, xja, X73, X74, 234.
Youngs, John, jun., 3x5, 406, 407, 408, 409,
463,464.
i